Safety Zone; Naval Training Operations, U.S. Naval Magazine Indian Island, WA, 57818-57819 [2019-23401]
Download as PDF
57818
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: October 23, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–23471 Filed 10–28–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0857]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Naval Training
Operations, U.S. Naval Magazine
Indian Island, WA
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 500-yard
radius of Walan Point, Indian Island,
WA. This safety zone is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from potential
hazards due to naval training
operations. Entry of vessels or persons
into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Puget Sound.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
on October 30, 2019, to 4 p.m. on
October 31, 2019, and will be subject to
enforcement each of these days from 8
a.m. to 4 p.m.
DATES:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0857 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Ellie Wu, Sector Puget
Sound Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
(206) 217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
17:42 Oct 28, 2019
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because issuing
an NPRM is impracticable. The Coast
Guard received notification of these
naval training operations from the U.S.
Navy on October 7, 2019, and we must
take action by October 30, 2019, to
protect the public from potential
hazards implicated by these training
operations. Delaying issuance of this
temporary final rule to publish an
NPRM and consider comments in
response to the NPRM is impracticable,
because the safety zone must be in place
for the operation, which begins on
October 30, 2019.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because of the danger associated with
these training operations, which may
include but is not limited to high-speed
maneuvers, simulated attacks, and the
firing of blank ammunition. This rule
must be effective starting October 30,
2019, to protect vessels, personnel, and
the marine environment from potential
hazards associated with these training
operations.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(formerly 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain
of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards exist
with this naval training operation. This
rule is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in
the navigable waters within the safety
zone from potential hazards posed by
the naval training operation.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
VerDate Sep<11>2014
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Jkt 250001
This rule establishes a safety zone
regulation from 10 a.m. on October 30,
2019, to 4 p.m. on October 31, 2019.
This regulation will only be subject to
enforcement for the following 8-hour
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
period each of these 2 days: 8 a.m. to 4
p.m.
The safety zone will cover navigable
waters within a 500-yard radius of
Walan Point, Indian Island.
The duration of this regulation is
intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while naval training
operations are taking place. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration
of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be
able to safely transit around this safety
zone which would impact a small
designated area of the waterway on the
western side of U.S. Naval Magazine
Indian Island. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone, and the rule will
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Oct 28, 2019
Jkt 250001
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Environmental
Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting only 16 hours in total,
which will prohibit entry within
designated zone during naval training
operations. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L60(a) in Table 3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures 5090.1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57819
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–0857 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–0857 Safety Zone; Naval
Training Operations, U.S. Naval Magazine
Indian Island, Washington.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters within
a 500 yards radius of Walan Point,
Indian Island, WA.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Puget Sound in the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in Part 165,
Subpart C, no persons or vessels may
enter or remain in the safety zone
created in this unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or their designated
representative. For permission to enter
the safety zone, contact the on-scene
designated representative or Joint
Harbor Operations Center via VHF CH16
or at 206–217–6002. Those in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port or their designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
daily, on October 30, 2019, and October
31, 2019.
Dated: October 21, 2019.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2019–23401 Filed 10–28–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57818-57819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23401]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0857]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Naval Training Operations, U.S. Naval Magazine
Indian Island, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of Walan Point, Indian
Island, WA. This safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from potential hazards due to naval training
operations. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. on October 30, 2019, to 4
p.m. on October 31, 2019, and will be subject to enforcement each of
these days from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0857 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Ellie Wu, Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (206) 217-6051, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because issuing an NPRM is impracticable. The
Coast Guard received notification of these naval training operations
from the U.S. Navy on October 7, 2019, and we must take action by
October 30, 2019, to protect the public from potential hazards
implicated by these training operations. Delaying issuance of this
temporary final rule to publish an NPRM and consider comments in
response to the NPRM is impracticable, because the safety zone must be
in place for the operation, which begins on October 30, 2019.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because of the danger associated with
these training operations, which may include but is not limited to
high-speed maneuvers, simulated attacks, and the firing of blank
ammunition. This rule must be effective starting October 30, 2019, to
protect vessels, personnel, and the marine environment from potential
hazards associated with these training operations.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (formerly 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Puget Sound
(COTP) has determined that potential hazards exist with this naval
training operation. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety
zone from potential hazards posed by the naval training operation.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone regulation from 10 a.m. on
October 30, 2019, to 4 p.m. on October 31, 2019. This regulation will
only be subject to enforcement for the following 8-hour period each of
these 2 days: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
The safety zone will cover navigable waters within a 500-yard
radius of Walan Point, Indian Island.
The duration of this regulation is intended to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters while
naval training operations are taking place. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit around this safety zone which would impact a small
designated area of the waterway on the western side of U.S. Naval
Magazine Indian Island. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule will allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
[[Page 57819]]
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting only 16 hours in
total, which will prohibit entry within designated zone during naval
training operations. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L60(a) in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0857 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0857 Safety Zone; Naval Training Operations, U.S. Naval
Magazine Indian Island, Washington.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters within a 500 yards radius of Walan Point, Indian Island, WA.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound in the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in Part
165, Subpart C, no persons or vessels may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in this unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or
their designated representative. For permission to enter the safety
zone, contact the on-scene designated representative or Joint Harbor
Operations Center via VHF CH16 or at 206-217-6002. Those in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by
the Captain of the Port or their designated representative.
(d) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m.
to 4 p.m. daily, on October 30, 2019, and October 31, 2019.
Dated: October 21, 2019.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2019-23401 Filed 10-28-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P