30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Disclosure of Violations of the Arms Export Control Act, 57801-57802 [2019-23442]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2019 / Notices
U.S. District Court—South Dakota: Office of
the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas
(Region VI).
Wyoming
U.S. District Court—Wyoming: Office of the
Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region
VIII).
Tennessee
Addresses of OGC Offices
U.S. District Court—Eastern District of
Tennessee: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII).
U.S. District Court—Middle District of
Tennessee: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII).
U.S. District Court—Western District of
Tennessee: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII).
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
I, Social Security Administration, JFK
Federal Building, Room 625, 15 New
Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203–0002
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
II, Social Security Administration, 26
Federal Plaza, Room 3904, New York,
NY 10278–0004
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
III, Social Security Administration, 300
Spring Garden Street, 6th Floor,
Philadelphia, PA 19123–2932
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
IV, Social Security Administration, Sam
Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Suite 20T45, Atlanta, GA
30303–8910
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
V, Social Security Administration, 200
West Adams Street, 30th Floor, Chicago,
IL 60606–5208
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
VI, Social Security Administration, 1301
Young Street, Ste. 340, Mailroom 104,
Dallas, TX 75202–5433
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
VII, Social Security Administration,
Richard Bolling Federal Building, 601 E.
12th Street, Room 965, Kansas City, MO
64106–2898
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
VIII, Social Security Administration,
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169, Denver,
CO 80294–4003
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
IX, Social Security Administration, 160
Spear Street, Suite 800, San Francisco,
CA 94105–1545
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region
X, Social Security Administration, 701
Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900, M/S 221A,
Seattle, WA 98104–7075
Office of Program Law, Office of the General
Counsel, Social Security Administration,
6401 Security Boulevard, Altmeyer
Building, Room 617, Baltimore, MD
21235–6401
South Dakota
Texas
U.S District Court—Eastern District of Texas:
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel,
Dallas (Region VI).
U.S. District Court—Northern District of
Texas: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Dallas (Region VI).
U.S. District Court—Southern District of
Texas: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Dallas (Region VI).
U.S. District Court—Western District of
Texas: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Dallas (Region VI).
Utah
U.S. District Court—Utah: Office of the
Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region
VIII).
Vermont
U.S. District Court—Vermont: Office of the
Regional Chief Counsel, New York
(Region II).
Virgin Islands
U.S. District Court—Virgin Islands: Office of
the Regional Chief Counsel, New York
(Region II).
Virginia
U.S. District Court—Eastern District of
Virginia: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III).
U.S. District Court—Western District of
Virginia: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Washington
U.S. District Court—Eastern District of
Washington: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Seattle (Region X).
U.S. District Court—Western District of
Washington: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Seattle (Region X).
Andrew Saul,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 2019–23478 Filed 10–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
West Virginia
U.S. District Court—Northern District of West
Virginia: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III).
U.S. District Court—Southern District of
West Virginia: Office of the Regional
Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III).
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Wisconsin
U.S. District Court—Eastern District of
Wisconsin: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Chicago (Region V).
U.S. District Court—Western District of
Wisconsin: Office of the Regional Chief
Counsel, Chicago (Region V).
ACTION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Oct 25, 2019
Jkt 250001
[Public Notice: 10871]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Disclosure of Violations of
the Arms Export Control Act
Notice of request for public
comment and submission to OMB of
proposed collection of information.
The Department of State has
submitted the information collection
described below to the Office of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57801
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 we
are requesting comments on this
collection from all interested
individuals and organizations. The
purpose of this Notice is to allow 30
days for public comment.
DATES: Submit comments directly to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) up to November 27, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the
Department of State Desk Officer in the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs at the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). You may submit
comments by the following methods:
• Email: oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov. You must include the DS
form number, information collection
title, and the OMB control number in
the subject line of your message.
• Fax: 202–395–5806. Attention: Desk
Officer for Department of State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection
listed in this notice, including requests
for copies of the proposed collection
instrument and supporting documents,
to Andrea Battista, Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls, Department of
State, who may be reached at
battistaAL@state.gov or 202–663–3136.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• Title of Information Collection:
Disclosure of Violations of the Arms
Export Control Act.
• OMB Control Number: 1405–0179.
• Type of Request: Revision of a
Currently Approved Collection.
• Originating Office: T/PM/DDTC.
• Form Number: DS–7787.
• Respondents: Individuals and
companies engaged in the business of
exporting or temporarily importing
defense hardware of defense technology
data who have committed an ITAR
violation.
• Estimated Number of Respondents:
12,500.
• Estimated Number of Responses:
700.
• Average Time per Response: 10
hours.
• Total Estimated Burden Time: 7,000
hours.
• Frequency: On Occasion.
• Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department.
• Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the time and cost burden for
this proposed collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used.
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
57802
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2019 / Notices
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the reporting burden on
those who are to respond, including the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Please note that comments submitted
in response to this Notice are public
record. Before including any detailed
personal information, you should be
aware that your comments as submitted,
including your personal information,
will be available for public review.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Abstract of Proposed Collection
The Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls (DDTC), located in the
Political-Military Affairs Bureau of the
Department of State, encourages
voluntary disclosures of violations of
the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22
U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), its implementing
regulations, the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR 120–
130), and any regulation, order, license,
or other authorization issued
thereunder. The information disclosed
is analyzed by DDTC to ultimately
determine whether to take
administrative action concerning any
violation that may have occurred.
Voluntary disclosure may be considered
a mitigating factor in determining the
administrative penalties, if any, that
may be imposed. Failure to report a
violation may result in circumstances
detrimental to the U.S. national security
and foreign policy interests and will be
an adverse factor in determining the
appropriate disposition of such
violations. Also, the activity in question
might merit referral to the Department
of Justice for consideration of whether
criminal prosecution is warranted. In
such cases, DDTC will notify the
Department of Justice of the voluntary
nature of the disclosure, but the
Department of Justice is not required to
give that fact any weight.
ITAR § 127.12 enunciates the
information which should accompany a
voluntary disclosure. Historically,
respondents to this information
collection submitted their disclosures to
DDTC in writing via hard copy
documentation. However, as part of an
IT modernization project designed to
streamline the collection and use of
information by DDTC, a discrete form
has been developed for the submission
of voluntary disclosures. This will allow
both DDTC and respondents submitting
a disclosure to more easily track
submissions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Oct 25, 2019
Jkt 250001
Methodology
This information will be collected by
electronic submission.
Karen Wrege,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–23442 Filed 10–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36301]
Oakland Global Rail Enterprise, LLC—
Acquisition Exemption—Rail Line in
Alameda County, Cal.
Oakland Global Rail Enterprise, LLC
(OGRE), has filed a verified notice of
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 for
authority after-the-fact to acquire by
sublease from Oakland Bulk &
Oversized Terminal, LLC (OBOT),
approximately 15,000 lineal feet of rail
line (located within approximately 11.5
acres of rail right of way) at the former
Oakland Army Base (OAB) in Alameda
County, Cal. (the Line).1 OGRE states
that the length of the Line includes
parallel tracks running within the rail
right-of-way, and that the Line does not
have milepost designations.
According to OGRE, the City of
Oakland leased to OBOT, an affiliate of
OGRE, an existing railroad right-of-way
located at the OAB, a portion of which
includes the Line. OGRE subleased the
railroad right-of-way from OBOT on
June 26, 2018, with the intent to
rehabilitate the rail line within that
right-of-way in order to provide rail
service to the rail-to-ship bulk
commodity marine terminal OBOT
plans to build at the OAB. OGRE states
that it is not seeking authority to operate
the Line at this time but that in the near
future it plans to seek operating
authority for what will be its entire rail
line, which will encompass track in
addition to the Line.
OGRE certifies that the projected
annual revenues as a result of this
transaction will not exceed the amount
that would qualify OGRE as a Class III
railroad, and that the projected annual
revenue for the Line will not exceed $5
1 As explained more fully in previous decisions
in this docket, OGRE filed its verified notice in
response to the Board’s decision in Oakland Global
Rail Enterprise—Petition for Declaratory Order, FD
36168 (STB served Mar. 15, 2019), and thereafter,
the effective date of the exemption was postponed
pending further order of the Board. Concurrent with
the publication of this notice, the Board is serving
a decision denying a petition by the City of Oakland
to reject or revoke OGRE’s verified notice and
making the exemption effective on November 11,
2019. See Oakland Glob. Rail Enter.—Acquis.
Exemption—Rail Line in Alameda Cty., Cal., FD
36301 et al. (STB served October 28, 2019).
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
million. OGRE also states that its
agreement with OBOT does not contain
any provision that would prohibit,
restrict, or otherwise limit future
interchange with any third-party carrier.
This exemption will become effective
on November 11, 2019.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions to stay must be
filed no later than November 4, 2019 (at
least seven days before the exemption
becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36301, must be filed with the
Surface Transportation Board either via
e-filing or in writing addressed to 395 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20423–0001.
In addition, a copy of each pleading
must be served on OGRE’s
representative, Kathryn Kusske Floyd,
Venable LLP, 600 Massachusetts
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20001.
According to OGRE, this action is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under 49 CFR.
1105.6(c) and from historic reporting
requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b).
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: October 23, 2019.
By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Director,
Office of Proceedings.
Raina Contee,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019–23511 Filed 10–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36302]
Oakland Bulk & Oversize Terminal,
LLC—Acquisition Exemption—Rail
Line in Alameda County, Cal.
Oakland Bulk & Oversize Terminal,
LLC (OBOT), has filed a verified notice
of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 for
authority after-the-fact to acquire by
lease from the City of Oakland (City)
approximately 15,000 lineal feet of rail
line (located within approximately 11.5
acres of rail right of way) at the former
Oakland Army Base (OAB) in Alameda
County, Cal. (the Line).1 The length of
1 As explained more fully in previous decisions
in this docket, OBOT filed its verified notice in
response to the Board’s decision in Oakland Global
Rail Enterprise—Petition for Declaratory Order, FD
36168 (STB served Mar. 15, 2019), and thereafter,
the effective date of the exemption was postponed
pending further order of the Board. Concurrent with
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57801-57802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23442]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 10871]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Disclosure of
Violations of the Arms Export Control Act
ACTION: Notice of request for public comment and submission to OMB of
proposed collection of information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State has submitted the information
collection described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for approval. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 we
are requesting comments on this collection from all interested
individuals and organizations. The purpose of this Notice is to allow
30 days for public comment.
DATES: Submit comments directly to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) up to November 27, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the Department of State Desk Officer in
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). You may submit comments by the following
methods:
Email: [email protected]. You must include the
DS form number, information collection title, and the OMB control
number in the subject line of your message.
Fax: 202-395-5806. Attention: Desk Officer for Department
of State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection listed in this notice, including
requests for copies of the proposed collection instrument and
supporting documents, to Andrea Battista, Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls, Department of State, who may be reached at
[email protected] or 202-663-3136.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Information Collection: Disclosure of Violations
of the Arms Export Control Act.
OMB Control Number: 1405-0179.
Type of Request: Revision of a Currently Approved
Collection.
Originating Office: T/PM/DDTC.
Form Number: DS-7787.
Respondents: Individuals and companies engaged in the
business of exporting or temporarily importing defense hardware of
defense technology data who have committed an ITAR violation.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 12,500.
Estimated Number of Responses: 700.
Average Time per Response: 10 hours.
Total Estimated Burden Time: 7,000 hours.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.
We are soliciting public comments to permit the Department to:
Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper functions of the Department.
Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the time and cost
burden for this proposed collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
[[Page 57802]]
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Please note that comments submitted in response to this Notice are
public record. Before including any detailed personal information, you
should be aware that your comments as submitted, including your
personal information, will be available for public review.
Abstract of Proposed Collection
The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), located in the
Political-Military Affairs Bureau of the Department of State,
encourages voluntary disclosures of violations of the Arms Export
Control Act (AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), its implementing
regulations, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22
CFR 120-130), and any regulation, order, license, or other
authorization issued thereunder. The information disclosed is analyzed
by DDTC to ultimately determine whether to take administrative action
concerning any violation that may have occurred. Voluntary disclosure
may be considered a mitigating factor in determining the administrative
penalties, if any, that may be imposed. Failure to report a violation
may result in circumstances detrimental to the U.S. national security
and foreign policy interests and will be an adverse factor in
determining the appropriate disposition of such violations. Also, the
activity in question might merit referral to the Department of Justice
for consideration of whether criminal prosecution is warranted. In such
cases, DDTC will notify the Department of Justice of the voluntary
nature of the disclosure, but the Department of Justice is not required
to give that fact any weight.
ITAR Sec. 127.12 enunciates the information which should accompany
a voluntary disclosure. Historically, respondents to this information
collection submitted their disclosures to DDTC in writing via hard copy
documentation. However, as part of an IT modernization project designed
to streamline the collection and use of information by DDTC, a discrete
form has been developed for the submission of voluntary disclosures.
This will allow both DDTC and respondents submitting a disclosure to
more easily track submissions.
Methodology
This information will be collected by electronic submission.
Karen Wrege,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019-23442 Filed 10-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P