Revision to Policy Statement on Consultation With Indian Tribes in Commission Proceedings, 56940-56942 [2019-23099]
Download as PDF
56940
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 206 / Thursday, October 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. PL20–1–000]
Revision to Policy Statement on
Consultation With Indian Tribes in
Commission Proceedings
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission is revising
its Policy Statement on Consultation
with Indian Tribes in Commission
Proceedings by adding a specific
reference to treaty rights; a statement
that the Commission addresses tribal
input in its NEPA documents and
orders, and consultation with Alaska
Native Corporations.
DATES: Effective November 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Molloy, Office of the General
Counsel, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426; 202–502–8771;
elizabeth.molloy@ferc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. By this order, the Commission is
amending its Policy Statement on
Consultation with Indian Tribes in
Commission Proceedings (policy
statement) 1 by adding a specific
reference to treaty rights and noting that
the Commission addresses tribal input
in its National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) documents and orders. In
addition, the Commission is adding
consultation with Alaska Native
Corporations to the policy statement
consistent with Congress’ requirement
that all Federal agencies consult with
Alaska Native corporations on the same
basis as Indian tribes under Executive
Order No. 13175.
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Background and Discussion
2. In 2003, the Commission issued its
Policy Statement on Consultation with
Indian Tribes in Commission
Proceedings. The 2003 policy statement
recognizes the unique relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes as defined by treaties,
statutes, and judicial decisions and
acknowledges the Commission’s trust
responsibilities. It states that the
Commission will endeavor to work with
the tribes on a government-togovernment basis and will seek to
1 Policy Statement on Consultation with Indian
Tribes in Commission Proceedings, Order No. 635,
104 FERC ¶ 61,108 (2003). The policy statement is
codified at 18 CFR 2.1c (2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
address the effects of proposed projects
on tribal rights and resources through
consultation pursuant to trust
responsibilities, the statutes governing
the Commission’s authority,2 and in the
Commission’s environmental and
decisional documents. Noting that the
Commission functions as a neutral,
quasi-judicial body and as such is
bound by the Administrative Procedure
Act and Commission rules regarding offthe-record communications,3 it states
that the Commission will assure tribal
issues and interests are considered in
making decisions. For the hydroelectric
program, it also states that the
Commission will notify tribes before or
at the time the licensee files its notice
of intent, and will consider
comprehensive plans prepared by tribes
or intertribal organizations.
3. In March 2017, the U.S.
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) commenced an engagement on
tribal consultation practices, in which it
sought to review tribal consultation
practices of 21 federal agencies involved
in permitting, review, or funding of
infrastructure projects.4 The engagement
was focused on federal agencies’
compliance with government to
government consultation and
coordination responsibilities under
Executive Order 13175; tribal
consultation practices used by federal
agencies during permitting and
developmental processes; definition and
consistent application of ‘‘meaningful
tribal consultations’’ by federal
agencies; opportunities for tribal input
2 The policy statement notes that the statutes
governing the Commission’s authority primarily
consist of the Federal Power Act, the Natural Gas
Act, the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, the Interstate Commerce Act, the Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act, National
Environmental Policy Act, and Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
3 18 CFR 385.2201 (2019).
4 The 21 federal agencies (which included 3
independent regulatory agencies, 3 departments,
and 15 component agencies) were: The Department
of Agriculture’s Forest Service and Rural
Development; Department of Commerce’s National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NMFS);
Department of Defense’s Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps); Department of Energy (DOE);
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Federal
Communications Commission (FCC); Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission); Department of Homeland Security’s
Coast Guard (Coast Guard) and Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA); Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD);
Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management (BOEM), Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS),
and National Park Service (NPS); Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC); and Department of
Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Federal Highway Administration (FHA),
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and Federal
Transit Administration (FTA).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
into contiguous, off-reservation
developments that may result in
pollution or other impacts on their land;
and appeal options, if any, available to
tribes.
4. In March 2019, GAO issued its final
report entitled, ‘‘Tribal Consultation:
Additional Federal Actions Needed for
Infrastructure Projects (GAO–19–22).’’ 5
GAO directed one of the 22
recommendations made in the report to
the Commission.6 Specifically, the GAO
recommendation stated that ‘‘[t]he
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
should document in its tribal
consultation policy how agency officials
are to communicate with tribes about
how their input from consultation was
considered in agency decisions on
infrastructure projects.’’ 7
A. Communication
5. As noted above, the Commission
functions as a neutral, quasi-judicial
body and as such is bound by the
Administrative Procedure Act and
Commission rules regarding off-therecord communications. In order to
comply with the requirements that
decisions be on the record, it has been
the Commission’s practice to address
tribal input and concerns in its
environmental documents and
decisions. However, the Commission’s
policy statement does not expressly
include language to that effect.
Therefore, the Commission is adding
language stating that the Commission
will set forth in its environmental
documents and orders how tribe’s input
from consultation was considered in
agency decisions on infrastructure
projects.
B. Treaty Rights
6. The Commission, in its final rule
on Hydroelectric Licensing under the
Federal Power Act issued
contemporaneously with the policy
statement, stated that, ‘‘tribal
consultation pursuant to our trust
responsibility encompasses more than
implementation of [National Historic
Preservation Act] Section 106. It
includes every issue of concern to an
Indian tribe related to a treaty, statute,
or executive order where the
Commission can, through the exercise of
its authorities under the FPA, fulfill its
5 Tribal Consultation: Additional Federal Actions
Needed for Infrastructure Projects (GAO–19–22),
March 2019 (GAO Report).
6 The report made a similar recommendation
regarding 13 of the other 21 agencies: the
Department of Agriculture’s Rural Development;
Corps; DOE; FCC; DHS; FEMA; HUD; BOEM,
Reclamation, FWS and NPS; NRC; and DOT.
7 GAO Report at 58.
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 206 / Thursday, October 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
trust responsibility.’’ 8 The policy
statement states that the ‘‘Commission,
in keeping with its trust responsibility,
will assure that tribal concerns and
interests are considered whenever the
Commission’s actions or decisions have
the potential to adversely affect Indian
tribes or Indian trust resources.’’ 9
7. While the Commission already
considers the effect of actions on treaty
rights in its NEPA and decision
documents,10 the Commission is taking
this opportunity to clarify that point by
adding specific mention of treaty rights
in the policy statement.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
C. Consultation With Alaska Native
Corporations
8. The policy statement addresses
consultation with federally-recognized
Indian tribes (including Alaska Native
tribes, villages, and communities) that
the Secretary of the Interior
acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe
pursuant to the Federally Recognized
Indian Tribe List Act of 1994.11 It does
not, however, address consultation with
Corporations established pursuant to the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
(ANCSA Corporations).12
9. After the Commission issued its
policy statement, Congress directed that
‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Management and Budget [and all
Federal agencies] shall hereafter consult
with Alaska Native corporations on the
same basis as Indian tribes under
Executive Order No. 13175.’’ 13
10. To be consistent with Congress’
directive, the Commission is updating
its policy to include ANCSA
Corporations. The Commission
recognizes and respects the distinct,
unique, and individual cultural
traditions and values of Alaska Native
peoples and the statutory relationship
between ANCSA Corporations and the
Federal Government.
11. The Commission distinguishes the
Federal relationship to ANCSA
8 Hydroelectric Licensing under the Federal Power
Act, Order No. 2002, 104 FERC ¶ 61,109, at P 279
(2003), order on reh’g, 106 FERC ¶ 61,037 (2004).
9 18 CFR 2.1c(e).
10 See e.g. Public Utility District No. 1 of
Snohomish County, Washington, 146 FERC
¶ 61,197, reh’g denied, 149 FERC ¶ 61,206 (2014);
PacifiCorp, 133 FERC ¶ 61,232 (2010), order on
reh’g, 135 FERC ¶ 61,064 (2011); and Bradwood
Landing LLC, 124 FERC ¶ 61,257 (2008), order on
reh’g, 129 FERC ¶ 61,245 (2009).
11 25 U.S.C. 479a.
12 43 U.S.C. 1601, et seq. An ANCSA Corporation
is defined as any Alaska Native village corporation,
urban corporation, or regional corporation as
defined in, or established pursuant to, the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act. 43 U.S.C. 1602.
13 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, Pub. L.
108–199, Div. II. Sec. 161, 118 Stat. 3, 452 (2004)
as amended by Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2005, Pub. L. 108–447, Div. H., Title V. Sec. 518,
118 Stat. 2809, 3267 (2004).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
Corporations from the government-togovernment relationship between the
Federal Government and federally
recognized Indian Tribes in Alaska and
elsewhere, and the update to the policy
will not diminish in any way that
relationship and the consultation
obligations towards federally recognized
Indian Tribes.
Information Collection Statement
12. The Paperwork Reduction Act and
implementing regulations of the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
require OMB to approve certain
information collection requirements
imposed by agency rule.14 However,
this Revised Policy Statement does not
contain or modify any information
collection requirements, and is therefore
not subject to OMB approval.
Environmental Analysis
13. The Commission is required to
prepare an Environmental Assessment
or an Environmental Impact Statement
for any action that may have a
significant adverse effect on the human
environment.15 Part 380 of the
Commission’s regulations lists
exemptions to the requirement to draft
an Environmental Assessment or
Environmental Impact Statement, and
this revised policy statement qualifies
under the exemption for procedural,
ministerial or internal administrative
actions.16
Regulatory Flexibility Act
14. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980 (RFA) 17 generally requires a
description and analysis of final rules
that will have significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Rules that are exempt from the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act are exempt from the RFA
requirements. This revised policy
statement concerns matters of internal
agency procedure and, therefore, an
analysis under the RFA is not required.
Document Availability
15. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the internet through the
Commission’s Home Page (https://
14 5
CFR 1320.12 (2019).
Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Order No. 486,
52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs.
¶ 30,783 (1987).) (cross-referenced at 41 FERC
¶ 61,284).
16 18 CFR 380.4(a)(1) (2019).
17 5 U.S.C. 601–612 (2018).
15 Regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56941
www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s
Public Reference Room during normal
business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
16. From the Commission’s Home
Page on the internet, this information is
available on eLibrary. The full text of
this document is available on eLibrary
in PDF and Microsoft Word format for
viewing, printing, and/or downloading.
To access this document in eLibrary,
type the docket number excluding the
last three digits of this document in the
docket number field.
17. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the Commission’s website
during normal business hours from
FERC Online Support at (202) 502–6652
(toll free at 1–866–208–3676) or email at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the
Public Reference Room at (202) 502–
8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email the
Public Reference Room at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
Effective Date and Congressional
Notification
18. This revised policy statement is
effective November 25, 2019 without a
period for public comment. Under 5
U.S.C. 533(b), notice and comment
procedures are unnecessary where a
rulemaking concerns only agency
procedure or practice, or where the
agency finds that notice and comment is
unnecessary. This revised policy
statement concerns only matters of
agency procedure, and will not
significantly affect regulated entities or
the general public.
19. The Revised Policy Statement will
be provided to the Congress and
Government Accountability Office.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 2
General policy and interpretations.
By the Commission.
Issued: October 17, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Commission is amending part 2, chapter
I, title 18, Code of Federal Regulations,
as follows.
PART 2—GENERAL POLICY AND
INTERPRETATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 601; 15 U.S.C. 717–
717z, 3301–3432; 16 U.S.C. 792–828c, 2601–
2645; 42 U.S.C. 4321–4370h, 7101–7352.
2. In § 2.1c:
a. In paragraph (a), add ‘‘and Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
■
■
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
56942
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 206 / Thursday, October 24, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
RIN 1205–AB96
Heidi M. Casta, Deputy Administrator,
Office of Policy Development and
Research, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW, Room N–
5641, Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202) 693–3700 (this is not a toll-free
number).
Individuals with hearing or speech
impairments may access the telephone
number above via TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
DFR, the Department stated that if a
significant adverse comment was
submitted by September 30, 2019, the
agency would publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that this DFR will
not take effect. The Department received
two significant adverse comments prior
to the close of the comment period and,
therefore, is withdrawing the direct final
rule. The Department will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based upon the proposed action also
published in the Federal Register on
August 29, 2019 (84 FR 45449).
Accordingly, effective October 24,
2019, the amendment to 20 CFR part
686 published in the Federal Register
on August 29, 2019 (84 FR 45449) is
withdrawn.
Procurement Roles and
Responsibilities for Job Corps
Contracts
John P. Pallasch,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training, Labor.
remanded to EPA by the Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. This
action is exempt from notice-andcomment rulemaking because it is
ministerial in nature.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0382. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Calcinore, Planning & Implementation
Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The
telephone number is (215) 814–2043.
Ms. Calcinore can also be reached via
electronic mail at calcinore.sara@
epa.gov.
[FR Doc. 2019–23238 Filed 10–23–19; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Corporations’’ after ‘‘Indian tribes’’ in
the first sentence.
■ b. In paragraph (c), add ‘‘and with
ANCSA Corporations in a similar
manner,’’ after ‘‘government-togovernment basis,’’ in the first sentence.
■ c. In paragraph (e), remove ‘‘or Indian
trust resources’’ and add in its place
‘‘Indian trust resources, or treaty rights’’.
■ d. Add a sentence to the end of
paragraph (e).
The addition reads as follows:
§ 2.1c Policy statement on consultation
with Indian tribes in Commission
proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * The Commission will use
the agency’s environmental and
decisional documents to communicate
how tribal input has been considered.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–23099 Filed 10–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
20 CFR Part 686
[DOL Docket No. ETA–2019–0006]
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Due to the receipt of two
significant adverse comments, the
Department of Labor (Department) is
withdrawing the August 29, 2019, direct
final rule (DFR) that would have made
two procedural changes to its Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act
(WIOA) Job Corps regulations. The
changes would have enabled the
Secretary of Labor to delegate
procurement authority as it relates to
the development and issuance of
requests for proposals for the operation
of Job Corps centers, outreach and
admissions, career transitional services,
and other operational support services.
This action would have aligned
regulatory provisions with the relevant
WIOA statutory language to provide
greater flexibility for internal operations
and management of the Job Corps
program.
DATES: Effective October 24, 2019, the
direct final rule published at 84 FR
45403 on August 29, 2019, is
withdrawn.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
I. Background and Rationale for This
Action
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0382; FRL–10001–
45–Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Correction Due to Vacatur of Revisions
To Implement the Revocation of the
1997 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards Final Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is correcting the state
implementation plan (SIP) for the
Commonwealth of Virginia to remove
from the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) revisions to the Virginia SIP that
were initially incorporated into the SIP
in a February 22, 2018 final action that
was subsequently vacated and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act), EPA establishes National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
criteria pollutants 1 in order to protect
human health and the environment. In
response to scientific evidence linking
ozone exposure to adverse health
effects, EPA promulgated the first ozone
NAAQS, the 0.12 part per million (ppm)
1-hour ozone NAAQS, in 1979. See 44
FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). The CAA
requires EPA to review and reevaluate
the NAAQS every five years in order to
consider updated information regarding
the effects of the criteria pollutants on
human health and the environment. On
July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a
revised ozone NAAQS, referred to as the
1997 ozone NAAQS, of 0.08 ppm
averaged over eight hours. 62 FR 38855.
This 8-hour ozone NAAQS was
determined to be more protective of
1 The ‘‘criteria pollutants’’ include ozone (O ),
3
particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2),
nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and
lead (Pb).
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56940-56942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23099]
[[Page 56940]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
18 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. PL20-1-000]
Revision to Policy Statement on Consultation With Indian Tribes
in Commission Proceedings
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is revising its Policy Statement on
Consultation with Indian Tribes in Commission Proceedings by adding a
specific reference to treaty rights; a statement that the Commission
addresses tribal input in its NEPA documents and orders, and
consultation with Alaska Native Corporations.
DATES: Effective November 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Molloy, Office of the
General Counsel, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426; 202-502-
8771; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. By this order, the Commission is amending its Policy Statement
on Consultation with Indian Tribes in Commission Proceedings (policy
statement) \1\ by adding a specific reference to treaty rights and
noting that the Commission addresses tribal input in its National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents and orders. In addition, the
Commission is adding consultation with Alaska Native Corporations to
the policy statement consistent with Congress' requirement that all
Federal agencies consult with Alaska Native corporations on the same
basis as Indian tribes under Executive Order No. 13175.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Policy Statement on Consultation with Indian Tribes in
Commission Proceedings, Order No. 635, 104 FERC ] 61,108 (2003). The
policy statement is codified at 18 CFR 2.1c (2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background and Discussion
2. In 2003, the Commission issued its Policy Statement on
Consultation with Indian Tribes in Commission Proceedings. The 2003
policy statement recognizes the unique relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes as defined by treaties, statutes, and
judicial decisions and acknowledges the Commission's trust
responsibilities. It states that the Commission will endeavor to work
with the tribes on a government-to-government basis and will seek to
address the effects of proposed projects on tribal rights and resources
through consultation pursuant to trust responsibilities, the statutes
governing the Commission's authority,\2\ and in the Commission's
environmental and decisional documents. Noting that the Commission
functions as a neutral, quasi-judicial body and as such is bound by the
Administrative Procedure Act and Commission rules regarding off-the-
record communications,\3\ it states that the Commission will assure
tribal issues and interests are considered in making decisions. For the
hydroelectric program, it also states that the Commission will notify
tribes before or at the time the licensee files its notice of intent,
and will consider comprehensive plans prepared by tribes or intertribal
organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The policy statement notes that the statutes governing the
Commission's authority primarily consist of the Federal Power Act,
the Natural Gas Act, the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, the Interstate Commerce Act, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands
Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
\3\ 18 CFR 385.2201 (2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. In March 2017, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
commenced an engagement on tribal consultation practices, in which it
sought to review tribal consultation practices of 21 federal agencies
involved in permitting, review, or funding of infrastructure
projects.\4\ The engagement was focused on federal agencies' compliance
with government to government consultation and coordination
responsibilities under Executive Order 13175; tribal consultation
practices used by federal agencies during permitting and developmental
processes; definition and consistent application of ``meaningful tribal
consultations'' by federal agencies; opportunities for tribal input
into contiguous, off-reservation developments that may result in
pollution or other impacts on their land; and appeal options, if any,
available to tribes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The 21 federal agencies (which included 3 independent
regulatory agencies, 3 departments, and 15 component agencies) were:
The Department of Agriculture's Forest Service and Rural
Development; Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NMFS); Department of Defense's Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps); Department of Energy (DOE);
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Federal Communications
Commission (FCC); Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission); Department of Homeland Security's Coast Guard (Coast
Guard) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD); Department of the Interior's
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
(BOEM), Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS); Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC); and Department of Transportation's Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Highway Administration (FHA),
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and Federal Transit
Administration (FTA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. In March 2019, GAO issued its final report entitled, ``Tribal
Consultation: Additional Federal Actions Needed for Infrastructure
Projects (GAO-19-22).'' \5\ GAO directed one of the 22 recommendations
made in the report to the Commission.\6\ Specifically, the GAO
recommendation stated that ``[t]he Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
should document in its tribal consultation policy how agency officials
are to communicate with tribes about how their input from consultation
was considered in agency decisions on infrastructure projects.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Tribal Consultation: Additional Federal Actions Needed for
Infrastructure Projects (GAO-19-22), March 2019 (GAO Report).
\6\ The report made a similar recommendation regarding 13 of the
other 21 agencies: the Department of Agriculture's Rural
Development; Corps; DOE; FCC; DHS; FEMA; HUD; BOEM, Reclamation, FWS
and NPS; NRC; and DOT.
\7\ GAO Report at 58.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Communication
5. As noted above, the Commission functions as a neutral, quasi-
judicial body and as such is bound by the Administrative Procedure Act
and Commission rules regarding off-the-record communications. In order
to comply with the requirements that decisions be on the record, it has
been the Commission's practice to address tribal input and concerns in
its environmental documents and decisions. However, the Commission's
policy statement does not expressly include language to that effect.
Therefore, the Commission is adding language stating that the
Commission will set forth in its environmental documents and orders how
tribe's input from consultation was considered in agency decisions on
infrastructure projects.
B. Treaty Rights
6. The Commission, in its final rule on Hydroelectric Licensing
under the Federal Power Act issued contemporaneously with the policy
statement, stated that, ``tribal consultation pursuant to our trust
responsibility encompasses more than implementation of [National
Historic Preservation Act] Section 106. It includes every issue of
concern to an Indian tribe related to a treaty, statute, or executive
order where the Commission can, through the exercise of its authorities
under the FPA, fulfill its
[[Page 56941]]
trust responsibility.'' \8\ The policy statement states that the
``Commission, in keeping with its trust responsibility, will assure
that tribal concerns and interests are considered whenever the
Commission's actions or decisions have the potential to adversely
affect Indian tribes or Indian trust resources.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Hydroelectric Licensing under the Federal Power Act, Order
No. 2002, 104 FERC ] 61,109, at P 279 (2003), order on reh'g, 106
FERC ] 61,037 (2004).
\9\ 18 CFR 2.1c(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. While the Commission already considers the effect of actions on
treaty rights in its NEPA and decision documents,\10\ the Commission is
taking this opportunity to clarify that point by adding specific
mention of treaty rights in the policy statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See e.g. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County,
Washington, 146 FERC ] 61,197, reh'g denied, 149 FERC ] 61,206
(2014); PacifiCorp, 133 FERC ] 61,232 (2010), order on reh'g, 135
FERC ] 61,064 (2011); and Bradwood Landing LLC, 124 FERC ] 61,257
(2008), order on reh'g, 129 FERC ] 61,245 (2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Consultation With Alaska Native Corporations
8. The policy statement addresses consultation with federally-
recognized Indian tribes (including Alaska Native tribes, villages, and
communities) that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist
as an Indian tribe pursuant to the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe
List Act of 1994.\11\ It does not, however, address consultation with
Corporations established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA Corporations).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 25 U.S.C. 479a.
\12\ 43 U.S.C. 1601, et seq. An ANCSA Corporation is defined as
any Alaska Native village corporation, urban corporation, or
regional corporation as defined in, or established pursuant to, the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. 43 U.S.C. 1602.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. After the Commission issued its policy statement, Congress
directed that ``[t]he Director of the Office of Management and Budget
[and all Federal agencies] shall hereafter consult with Alaska Native
corporations on the same basis as Indian tribes under Executive Order
No. 13175.'' \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, Pub. L. 108-199,
Div. II. Sec. 161, 118 Stat. 3, 452 (2004) as amended by
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, Div. H.,
Title V. Sec. 518, 118 Stat. 2809, 3267 (2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. To be consistent with Congress' directive, the Commission is
updating its policy to include ANCSA Corporations. The Commission
recognizes and respects the distinct, unique, and individual cultural
traditions and values of Alaska Native peoples and the statutory
relationship between ANCSA Corporations and the Federal Government.
11. The Commission distinguishes the Federal relationship to ANCSA
Corporations from the government-to-government relationship between the
Federal Government and federally recognized Indian Tribes in Alaska and
elsewhere, and the update to the policy will not diminish in any way
that relationship and the consultation obligations towards federally
recognized Indian Tribes.
Information Collection Statement
12. The Paperwork Reduction Act and implementing regulations of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) require OMB to approve certain
information collection requirements imposed by agency rule.\14\
However, this Revised Policy Statement does not contain or modify any
information collection requirements, and is therefore not subject to
OMB approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 5 CFR 1320.12 (2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Environmental Analysis
13. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may
have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.\15\ Part
380 of the Commission's regulations lists exemptions to the requirement
to draft an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement,
and this revised policy statement qualifies under the exemption for
procedural, ministerial or internal administrative actions.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats.
& Regs. ] 30,783 (1987).) (cross-referenced at 41 FERC ] 61,284).
\16\ 18 CFR 380.4(a)(1) (2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Act
14. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \17\ generally
requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Rules that are exempt from the notice and comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act are exempt from the
RFA requirements. This revised policy statement concerns matters of
internal agency procedure and, therefore, an analysis under the RFA is
not required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Availability
15. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov) and
in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426.
16. From the Commission's Home Page on the internet, this
information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is
available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing,
printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type
the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in
the docket number field.
17. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's
website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at (202)
502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at
[email protected], or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at
[email protected].
Effective Date and Congressional Notification
18. This revised policy statement is effective November 25, 2019
without a period for public comment. Under 5 U.S.C. 533(b), notice and
comment procedures are unnecessary where a rulemaking concerns only
agency procedure or practice, or where the agency finds that notice and
comment is unnecessary. This revised policy statement concerns only
matters of agency procedure, and will not significantly affect
regulated entities or the general public.
19. The Revised Policy Statement will be provided to the Congress
and Government Accountability Office.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 2
General policy and interpretations.
By the Commission.
Issued: October 17, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission is amending part
2, chapter I, title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows.
PART 2--GENERAL POLICY AND INTERPRETATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 601; 15 U.S.C. 717-717z, 3301-3432; 16
U.S.C. 792-828c, 2601-2645; 42 U.S.C. 4321-4370h, 7101-7352.
0
2. In Sec. 2.1c:
0
a. In paragraph (a), add ``and Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
(ANCSA)
[[Page 56942]]
Corporations'' after ``Indian tribes'' in the first sentence.
0
b. In paragraph (c), add ``and with ANCSA Corporations in a similar
manner,'' after ``government-to-government basis,'' in the first
sentence.
0
c. In paragraph (e), remove ``or Indian trust resources'' and add in
its place ``Indian trust resources, or treaty rights''.
0
d. Add a sentence to the end of paragraph (e).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 2.1c Policy statement on consultation with Indian tribes in
Commission proceedings.
* * * * *
(e) * * * The Commission will use the agency's environmental and
decisional documents to communicate how tribal input has been
considered.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-23099 Filed 10-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P