Virginia Regulatory Program, 56696-56698 [2019-22946]
Download as PDF
56696
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Original amendment
submission date
Date of final
publication
Citation/description
*
August 20, 2013 ............
*
*
October 23, 2019 ...........
*
*
*
*
ARM 17.24.1001(1)(b), (1)(c), (2), (2)(h)(iii)(F), (2)(q), and (7), Permit Requirement; ARM
17.24.1002(3), Information and Monthly Reports; ARM 17.24.1003(1), Renewal and
Transfer of Permits; ARM 17.24.1005(2)(d), Drill holes; ARM 17.24.1016(3), Bond Requirements for Drilling Operations; ARM 17.24.1018(1)(b), (2), (4), (5)(a), (6), (7), (8),
and (9), Notice of Intent to Prospect; ARM 17.24.1019, Permit requirement—short form;
MCA 82–4–222(1)(k), (1)(l), (2), (2)(l), (2)(m), and (8), Permit application—application
revisions; MCA 82–4–226(1), (2), (7)(a), (7)(b)(i), (7)(b)(ii), and (8), Prospecting permit;
MCA 82–4–227 (8), Refusal of permit—applicant violator system; MCA 82–4–237(1),
(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(c), (2), and (3), Operator to file annual reports; MCA 82–4–253(3)(d),
Suit for damage to water supply.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE’s Decision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
[FR Doc. 2019–22945 Filed 10–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
I. Background on the Virginia Program
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[SATS No. VA–128–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2016–0007; S1D1S SS08011000 SX066A000
201S180110; S2D2S SS08011000
SX066A000 20XS501520]
Virginia Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment
to the Virginia regulatory program (the
Virginia program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). The
amendment revises the Virginia Coal
Surface Mining Reclamation
Regulations (the State regulations). The
changes involve adding a provision to
Virginia Administrative Code (VAC) to
require Virginia to enter permit
information into the Federal Applicant
Violator System (AVS) and add a
provision to the Virginia program to
specify that the final compliance review
conducted prior to permit issuance must
occur no more than five business days
before issuance.
DATES: The effective date is November
22, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Roger Calhoun, Field Office Director,
Charleston Field Office. Telephone:
(304) 347–7158. Email: rcalhoun@
osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE’s Findings
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Oct 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, State laws
and regulations that govern surface coal
mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of
this Act and consistent with the Federal
regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1)
and (7). On the basis of these criteria,
the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Virginia
program on December 15, 1981. You can
find background information on the
Virginia program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval,
in the December 15, 1981, Federal
Register (46 FR 61088). You can also
find later actions concerning the
Virginia program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 946.12, 946.13,
and 946.15.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated April 29, 2016
(Administrative Record No. VA 2033)
Virginia sent an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.).
We announced receipt of the
proposed amendment in the March 31,
2017, Federal Register (82 FR 16010). In
the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an
opportunity for a public hearing or
meeting on the adequacy of the
amendment. We did not hold a public
hearing or meeting because no one
requested one. The public comment
period ended on May 1, 2017. No public
comments were received.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
III. OSMRE’s Findings
Virginia submitted this program
amendment to ensure consistency of
Virginia and Federal regulations with
respect to the AVS. The submission
included changes to Title 4 of the VAC
that includes the entry of permit
information into the AVS upon receipt
and review of an administratively
complete application and to conduct a
final compliance review prior to permit
issuance no more than five business
days before permit issuance.
(Administrative Record No. VA 2033).
We are approving the amendment.
Our specific findings concerning
Virginia’s amendment under SMCRA
and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
773.8 and 773.12 and the substantive
changes to Virginia’s Review of Permit
Applications are described below.
4 VAC 25–130–773.15. Review of
Permit Applications: Virginia seeks to
revise subsection (a)(3) of this
regulation, which addresses review of
the information submitted under 4 VAC
25–130–778.13 and 4 VAC 25–130–
778.14 about the applicant’s or
operator’s permit histories, business
structure, and ownership and control
relationships. The division must also
enter permit information into AVS upon
receipt and review of an
administratively complete application.
Additionally, in relationship to 4 VAC
25–130–773.15. Review of Permit
Applications: Virginia seeks to revise
subsection (e) to provide that the final
compliance review of a permit
application, required under 4 VAC 25–
130–773.15(b)(1), must be conducted no
more than five business days before
permit issuance under 773.19 of this
part.
The amendment to subsection (a)(3) of
4 VAC–25–130–773.15 adds the
requirement that all permit information
that must be reviewed by the regulatory
authority must also be entered into the
AVS. The addition of this requirement
renders the Virginia program no less
effective than its Federal counterpart at
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
30 CFR 773.8. Therefore, we approve
the amendment to subsection (a)(3).
The addition of the requirement that
the final compliance review take place
no more than five business days before
permit issuance renders subsection (e)
of 4 VAC–25–130–773.15 no less
effective than its Federal counterpart at
30 CFR 773.12(c). The amendment to
subsection (e) is therefore approved.
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the
amendment and did not receive any.
Federal Agency Comments
On May 9, 2016, pursuant to 30 CFR
732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b) of
SMCRA, we requested comments on the
amendments from various Federal
agencies with an actual or potential
interest in the Virginia program
(Administrative Record No. 2034). No
Federal agency comments were
received.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we
are required to get concurrence from
EPA for those provisions of the program
amendment that relate to air or water
quality standards issued under the
authority of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the
revisions that Virginia proposed to make
in this amendment pertains to air or
water quality standards. Therefore, we
did not ask EPA to concur on the
amendment. However, on May 9, 2016,
under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we
requested comments from the EPA on
the amendment. The EPA did not
provide any comments.
V. OSMRE’s Decision
Based on the above findings, we are
approving Virginia’s amendment that
was submitted on April 29, 2016
(Administrative Record No. VA 2033).
To implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations, at 30
CFR part 946, which codify decisions
concerning the Virginia program. In
accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 500 et seq.), this
rule will take effect 30 days after the
date of publication. Section 503(a) of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253) requires that
the State’s program demonstrate that it
has the capability of carrying out the
provisions of the Act and meeting its
purposes. SMCRA requires consistency
between State and Federal standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Oct 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Executive Order 12630—Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
This rule would not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications that would result in
public property being taken for
government use without just
compensation under the law. Therefore,
a takings implication assessment is not
required. This determination is based on
the analysis of the corresponding
Federal regulations.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review and 13563—
Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) will review all significant
rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance, dated
October 12, 1993, the approval of state
program amendments is exempted from
OMB review under Executive Order
12866. Executive Order 13563, which
reaffirms and supplements Executive
Order 12866, retains this exemption.
Executive Order 13771—Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
State program amendments are not
regulatory actions under Executive
Order 13771 because they are exempt
from review under Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
reviewed this rule as required by
Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988.
The Department has determined that
this Federal Register notice meets the
criteria of Section 3 of Executive Order
12988, which is intended to ensure that
the agency review its legislation and
proposed regulations to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity; that the
agency writes its legislation and
regulations to minimize litigation, and
that the agency’s legislation and
regulations provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather
than a general standard, and promote
simplification and burden reduction.
Because Section 3 focuses on the quality
of Federal legislation and regulations,
the Department limited its review under
this Executive Order to the quality of
this Federal Register document and to
changes to the Federal regulations. The
review under this Executive Order did
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56697
not extend to the language of the State
regulatory program or to the program
amendment that the Commonwealth of
Virginia drafted.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule is not a ‘‘[p]olicy that [has]
Federalism implications’’ as defined by
Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132
because it does not have ‘‘substantial
direct effects on the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ Instead, this rule
approves an amendment to the Virginia
program submitted and drafted by that
State. OSMRE reviewed the submission
with fundamental federalism principles
in mind as set forth in Section 2 and 3
of the Executive Order and with the
principles of cooperative federalism, as
set forth in SMCRA. See, e.g., 30 U.S.C.
1201(f). Specifically, pursuant to
Section 503(a)(1) and (7)(30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7)), OSMRE reviewed
the program amendment to ensure that
it is ‘‘in accordance with’’ the
requirements of SMCRA and ‘‘consistent
with’’ the regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Tribes
through a commitment to consultation
with Tribes and recognitions of their
right to self-governance and tribal
sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule
under the Department’s consultation
policy and under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have
determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized
Tribes or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Tribes. Therefore,
consultation under the Department’s
tribal consultation policy is not
required. The basis for this
determination is that our decision is on
the Virginia program, which does not
include Tribal lands or regulation of
activities on Tribal lands. Tribal lands
are regulated independently under the
applicable, approved Federal program.
Executive Order 13211—Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Executive Order 13211 requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is
(1) considered significant under
Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
56698
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
a significant energy action under the
definition in Executive Order 13211, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Executive Order 13045—Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13405 because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866; and this action does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consistent with sections 501(a) and
702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1251(a) and
1292(d) respectively) and the U.S.
Department of the Interior Departmental
Manual, part 516, section 13.5 (A), state
program amendments are not major
Federal actions within the meaning of
section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act. (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.)
directs OSMRE to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. (OMB Circular
A–119 at p. 14). This action is not
subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application
of those requirements would be
inconsistent with SMCRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not include requests
and requirements of an individual,
partnership, or corporation to obtain
information and report it to a Federal
agency. As this rule does not contain
information collection requirements, a
submission to OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.) is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). The State submittal, which is
the subject of this rule, is based upon
the corresponding Federal regulations
for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
corresponding Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S. based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based on an analysis of
the corresponding Federal regulations,
which were determined not to
constitute a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments, or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector. This
determination is based on an analysis of
the corresponding Federal regulations,
which were determined not to impose
an unfunded mandate. Therefore, a
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 946
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: September 13, 2019
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic—
Appalachian Region.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 946 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 946—VIRGINIA
1. The authority citation for part 946
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. Section 946.15 is amended in the
table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ‘‘date of Final
publication’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 946.15 Approval of Virginia regulatory
program amendments.
*
*
*
*
*
Original amendment
submission date
Date of final
publication
Citation/description
*
April 29, 2016 ................
*
*
October 23, 2019 ...........
*
*
*
*
Amend the following sections of the Virginia Administrative Code: Section 4 VAC 25–130–
773.15(a)(3). Review of Permit Applications, General; Section 4 VAC 25–130–
773.15(e). Review of Permit Applications, Final compliance review.
[FR Doc. 2019–22946 Filed 10–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Oct 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 23, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56696-56698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22946]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[SATS No. VA-128-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2016-0007; S1D1S SS08011000
SX066A000 201S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX066A000 20XS501520]
Virginia Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Virginia regulatory program
(the Virginia program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation
Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). The amendment revises the Virginia Coal
Surface Mining Reclamation Regulations (the State regulations). The
changes involve adding a provision to Virginia Administrative Code
(VAC) to require Virginia to enter permit information into the Federal
Applicant Violator System (AVS) and add a provision to the Virginia
program to specify that the final compliance review conducted prior to
permit issuance must occur no more than five business days before
issuance.
DATES: The effective date is November 22, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roger Calhoun, Field Office
Director, Charleston Field Office. Telephone: (304) 347-7158. Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, State laws and regulations
that govern surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act and consistent with the
Federal regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of
these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Virginia program on December 15, 1981. You can find background
information on the Virginia program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval, in
the December 15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 61088). You can also
find later actions concerning the Virginia program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 946.12, 946.13, and 946.15.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated April 29, 2016 (Administrative Record No. VA 2033)
Virginia sent an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.).
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the March 31,
2017, Federal Register (82 FR 16010). In the same document, we opened
the public comment period and provided an opportunity for a public
hearing or meeting on the adequacy of the amendment. We did not hold a
public hearing or meeting because no one requested one. The public
comment period ended on May 1, 2017. No public comments were received.
III. OSMRE's Findings
Virginia submitted this program amendment to ensure consistency of
Virginia and Federal regulations with respect to the AVS. The
submission included changes to Title 4 of the VAC that includes the
entry of permit information into the AVS upon receipt and review of an
administratively complete application and to conduct a final compliance
review prior to permit issuance no more than five business days before
permit issuance. (Administrative Record No. VA 2033).
We are approving the amendment. Our specific findings concerning
Virginia's amendment under SMCRA and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
773.8 and 773.12 and the substantive changes to Virginia's Review of
Permit Applications are described below.
4 VAC 25-130-773.15. Review of Permit Applications: Virginia seeks
to revise subsection (a)(3) of this regulation, which addresses review
of the information submitted under 4 VAC 25-130-778.13 and 4 VAC 25-
130-778.14 about the applicant's or operator's permit histories,
business structure, and ownership and control relationships. The
division must also enter permit information into AVS upon receipt and
review of an administratively complete application.
Additionally, in relationship to 4 VAC 25-130-773.15. Review of
Permit Applications: Virginia seeks to revise subsection (e) to provide
that the final compliance review of a permit application, required
under 4 VAC 25-130-773.15(b)(1), must be conducted no more than five
business days before permit issuance under 773.19 of this part.
The amendment to subsection (a)(3) of 4 VAC-25-130-773.15 adds the
requirement that all permit information that must be reviewed by the
regulatory authority must also be entered into the AVS. The addition of
this requirement renders the Virginia program no less effective than
its Federal counterpart at
[[Page 56697]]
30 CFR 773.8. Therefore, we approve the amendment to subsection (a)(3).
The addition of the requirement that the final compliance review
take place no more than five business days before permit issuance
renders subsection (e) of 4 VAC-25-130-773.15 no less effective than
its Federal counterpart at 30 CFR 773.12(c). The amendment to
subsection (e) is therefore approved.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment and did not receive
any.
Federal Agency Comments
On May 9, 2016, pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section
503(b) of SMCRA, we requested comments on the amendments from various
Federal agencies with an actual or potential interest in the Virginia
program (Administrative Record No. 2034). No Federal agency comments
were received.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get concurrence
from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that relate to
air or water quality standards issued under the authority of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401
et seq.). None of the revisions that Virginia proposed to make in this
amendment pertains to air or water quality standards. Therefore, we did
not ask EPA to concur on the amendment. However, on May 9, 2016, under
30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments from the EPA on the
amendment. The EPA did not provide any comments.
V. OSMRE's Decision
Based on the above findings, we are approving Virginia's amendment
that was submitted on April 29, 2016 (Administrative Record No. VA
2033). To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal
regulations, at 30 CFR part 946, which codify decisions concerning the
Virginia program. In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 500 et seq.), this rule will take effect 30 days after the
date of publication. Section 503(a) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253) requires
that the State's program demonstrate that it has the capability of
carrying out the provisions of the Act and meeting its purposes. SMCRA
requires consistency between State and Federal standards.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12630--Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
This rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications that would result in public property
being taken for government use without just compensation under the law.
Therefore, a takings implication assessment is not required. This
determination is based on the analysis of the corresponding Federal
regulations.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review and 13563--
Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance, dated October
12, 1993, the approval of state program amendments is exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13563, which
reaffirms and supplements Executive Order 12866, retains this
exemption.
Executive Order 13771--Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
State program amendments are not regulatory actions under Executive
Order 13771 because they are exempt from review under Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has reviewed this rule as required
by Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988. The Department has determined
that this Federal Register notice meets the criteria of Section 3 of
Executive Order 12988, which is intended to ensure that the agency
review its legislation and proposed regulations to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; that the agency writes its legislation and
regulations to minimize litigation, and that the agency's legislation
and regulations provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct
rather than a general standard, and promote simplification and burden
reduction. Because Section 3 focuses on the quality of Federal
legislation and regulations, the Department limited its review under
this Executive Order to the quality of this Federal Register document
and to changes to the Federal regulations. The review under this
Executive Order did not extend to the language of the State regulatory
program or to the program amendment that the Commonwealth of Virginia
drafted.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule is not a ``[p]olicy that [has] Federalism implications''
as defined by Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132 because it does not
have ``substantial direct effects on the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
Instead, this rule approves an amendment to the Virginia program
submitted and drafted by that State. OSMRE reviewed the submission with
fundamental federalism principles in mind as set forth in Section 2 and
3 of the Executive Order and with the principles of cooperative
federalism, as set forth in SMCRA. See, e.g., 30 U.S.C. 1201(f).
Specifically, pursuant to Section 503(a)(1) and (7)(30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7)), OSMRE reviewed the program amendment to ensure
that it is ``in accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA and
``consistent with'' the regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to
SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Tribes through a commitment
to consultation with Tribes and recognitions of their right to self-
governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule under
the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Tribes or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Tribes.
Therefore, consultation under the Department's tribal consultation
policy is not required. The basis for this determination is that our
decision is on the Virginia program, which does not include Tribal
lands or regulation of activities on Tribal lands. Tribal lands are
regulated independently under the applicable, approved Federal program.
Executive Order 13211--Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is (1) considered significant
under Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the
[[Page 56698]]
supply, distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt
from review under Executive Order 12866 and is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive Order 13211, a Statement of
Energy Effects is not required.
Executive Order 13045--Protection of Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13405 because this is
not an economically significant regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866; and this action does not address environmental
health or safety risks disproportionately affecting children.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consistent with sections 501(a) and 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1251(a) and 1292(d) respectively) and the U.S. Department of the
Interior Departmental Manual, part 516, section 13.5 (A), state program
amendments are not major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act. (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) directs OSMRE to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. (OMB
Circular A-119 at p. 14). This action is not subject to the
requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those
requirements would be inconsistent with SMCRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not include requests and requirements of an
individual, partnership, or corporation to obtain information and
report it to a Federal agency. As this rule does not contain
information collection requirements, a submission to OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.) is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal, which is the subject
of this rule, is based upon the corresponding Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In making the determination as to
whether this rule would have a significant economic impact, the
Department relied upon the data and assumptions for the corresponding
Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based on an analysis of the
corresponding Federal regulations, which were determined not to
constitute a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments, or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. This determination
is based on an analysis of the corresponding Federal regulations, which
were determined not to impose an unfunded mandate. Therefore, a
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 946
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: September 13, 2019
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic--Appalachian Region.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 946 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 946--VIRGINIA
0
1. The authority citation for part 946 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 946.15 is amended in the table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ``date of Final publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 946.15 Approval of Virginia regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission date Date of final publication Citation/description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
April 29, 2016.......................... October 23, 2019....................... Amend the following sections
of the Virginia
Administrative Code: Section
4 VAC 25-130-773.15(a)(3).
Review of Permit
Applications, General;
Section 4 VAC 25-130-
773.15(e). Review of Permit
Applications, Final
compliance review.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-22946 Filed 10-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P