Air Plan Approval; Arkansas; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2010 1-Hour SO2, 55864-55865 [2019-22545]
Download as PDF
55864
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 202 / Friday, October 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0833 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0833 Safety Zone; Allegheny
River, Mile 14.7 to Mile 15, Cheswick, PA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all waters of the Allegheny
River from mile 14.7 to mile 15.
(b) Effective period. This section is
effective from 7:30 p.m. through 9:30
p.m. on October 19, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
of persons and vessels into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The COTP’s
representative may be contacted at 412–
221–0807.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or a designated representative.
Designated COTP representatives
include United States Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officer.
(d) Information broadcasts. The
Captain COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public
through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as
appropriate.
A.W. Demo,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2019–22751 Filed 10–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2019–0438; FRL–10000–
92–Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; Arkansas; Interstate
Transport Requirements for the 2010 1Hour SO2 NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:43 Oct 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
ACTION:
Final rule.
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is approving the portion of Arkansas’s
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittal addressing two of the CAA
interstate transport requirements for the
2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). EPA is determining the
Arkansas SIP contains adequate
provisions to ensure that the air
emissions in the state will not
significantly contribute to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS in
any other state.
DATES: This rule is effective on
November 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2019–0438. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201
Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas
75270.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nevine Salem, EPA Region 6 Office,
Ozone and Infrastructure Section, 1201
Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, TX 75270,
214–665–7222, salem.nevine@epa.gov.
To inspect the hard copy materials,
please schedule an appointment with
Ms. Salem or Mr. Bill Deese at 214–665–
7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On March 24, 2017, Arkansas
submitted, through the Arkansas
Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ), a revision to its SIP to satisfy
the infrastructure requirements of
section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, including the
interstate transport requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On February
14, 2018 (83 FR 6470), EPA approved
Arkansas’s infrastructure SIP submittal
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS for all
applicable elements of section 110(a)(2)
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with the exception of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
and the portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) that
pertains to visibility protection. On
August 8, 2019, the EPA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to approve the portions of the March 24,
2017 submittal from the state of
Arkansas as meeting the interstate
transport requirement of the CAA
requirements that the Arkansas SIP
includes adequate provisions
prohibiting any emissions activity in the
state that will contribute significantly to
nonattainment, or interferes with
maintenance, of the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS in any downwind state. A
detailed analysis of the State’s
submittals analysis and rationale for
approval of the submittal were provided
in the NPRM and will not be restated
here. The public comment period for
this proposed rulemaking ended on
September 9, 2019. The EPA received
one anonymous comment in favor/
support of our proposed action. A copy
of the comment is included in the
docket of this rulemaking. We did not
receive any adverse comments regarding
our proposal. No response to comment
is required.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the portions of
the Arkansas’s March 24, 2017 SIP that
address two of the interstate transport
requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS as these portions meet the
requirements in CAA section 110 and
specifically in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). EPA
determines that the Arkansas SIP
contains adequate provisions to ensure
that the air emissions in the State will
not significantly contribute to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS in
any other state. This action is being
taken under section 110 of the Act.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM
18OCR1
55865
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 202 / Friday, October 18, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 17,
2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Interstate transport of
pollution, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: October 9, 2019.
Kenley McQueen,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
Title 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E—Arkansas
2. In § 52.170(e), the table titled ‘‘EPAApproved Non-Regulatory Provisions
and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the
Arkansas SIP’’ is amended by revising
the entry for ‘‘Infrastructure for the 2010
SO2 NAAQS’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.170
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE ARKANSAS SIP
Name of SIP
provision
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
*
*
Infrastructure for the Statewide ...............
2010 SO2 NAAQS.
*
*
State
submittal/
effective
date
*
3/24/2017
EPA approval date
*
2/14/2018, 83 FR
6470.
*
*
Explanation
*
*
*
Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i) (portion pertaining
to PSD), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M).
Approval for 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) on 10/18/2019.
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–22545 Filed 10–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:43 Oct 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM
18OCR1
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55864-55865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22545]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2019-0438; FRL-10000-92-Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; Arkansas; Interstate Transport Requirements
for the 2010 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the portion of
Arkansas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal addressing two of
the CAA interstate transport requirements for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). EPA is
determining the Arkansas SIP contains adequate provisions to ensure
that the air emissions in the state will not significantly contribute
to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2010
SO2 NAAQS in any other state.
DATES: This rule is effective on November 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2019-0438. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500,
Dallas, Texas 75270.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nevine Salem, EPA Region 6 Office,
Ozone and Infrastructure Section, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas,
TX 75270, 214-665-7222, [email protected]. To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment with Ms. Salem or Mr. Bill
Deese at 214-665-7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.
I. Background
On March 24, 2017, Arkansas submitted, through the Arkansas
Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), a revision to its SIP to
satisfy the infrastructure requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, including the interstate
transport requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On February 14,
2018 (83 FR 6470), EPA approved Arkansas's infrastructure SIP submittal
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS for all applicable elements of
section 110(a)(2) with the exception of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and the
portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) that pertains to visibility protection.
On August 8, 2019, the EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) to approve the portions of the March 24, 2017 submittal from the
state of Arkansas as meeting the interstate transport requirement of
the CAA requirements that the Arkansas SIP includes adequate provisions
prohibiting any emissions activity in the state that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment, or interferes with maintenance, of the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS in any downwind state. A detailed
analysis of the State's submittals analysis and rationale for approval
of the submittal were provided in the NPRM and will not be restated
here. The public comment period for this proposed rulemaking ended on
September 9, 2019. The EPA received one anonymous comment in favor/
support of our proposed action. A copy of the comment is included in
the docket of this rulemaking. We did not receive any adverse comments
regarding our proposal. No response to comment is required.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the portions of the Arkansas's March 24, 2017
SIP that address two of the interstate transport requirements for the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS as these portions meet the
requirements in CAA section 110 and specifically in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
EPA determines that the Arkansas SIP contains adequate provisions to
ensure that the air emissions in the State will not significantly
contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2010
SO2 NAAQS in any other state. This action is being taken
under section 110 of the Act.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735,
[[Page 55865]]
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 17, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Interstate transport of pollution, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: October 9, 2019.
Kenley McQueen,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
Title 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E--Arkansas
0
2. In Sec. 52.170(e), the table titled ``EPA-Approved Non-Regulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Arkansas SIP'' is
amended by revising the entry for ``Infrastructure for the 2010
SO2 NAAQS'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.170 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Non-Regulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Arkansas Sip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
geographic or State EPA approval
Name of SIP provision nonattainment submittal/ date Explanation
area effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Infrastructure for the 2010 Statewide....... 3/24/2017 2/14/2018, 83 Approval for 110(a)(2)(A),
SO2 NAAQS. FR 6470. (B), (C), (D)(i) (portion
pertaining to PSD), (D)(ii),
(E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K),
(L) and (M). Approval for
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) on 10/18/
2019.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-22545 Filed 10-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P