Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico; Suspension of Anti-Dumping Investigation, 54639-54640 [2019-22214]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2019 / Notices
individual were recovered from the
White Farm in southwest AR. The
individual is an adult male of
indeterminate sex. No associated
funerary objects are present. Diagnostic
artifacts found in southwest Arkansas
indicate that these human remains were
probably buried sometime during the
Prehistoric Period (11,650 B.C.–A.D.
1541).
This notice includes a variety of terms
commonly used in discussions of
Arkansas archeology and the historical
trajectories that gave rise to specific
Native American communities
identified in the historical record. Based
on the archeological context for these
sites and current expert opinion, the
earlier groups who occupied the sites
listed in this notice are culturally
affiliated with the Caddo Nation of
Oklahoma.
Determinations Made by the Arkansas
Archeological Survey
Officials of the Arkansas
Archeological Survey have determined
that:
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described in this notice
represent the physical remains of 52
individuals of Native American
ancestry.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A),
the 112 objects described in this notice
are reasonably believed to have been
placed with or near individual human
remains at the time of death or later as
part of the death rite or ceremony.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there
is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the Native American human
remains and associated funerary objects
and the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma.
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Lineal descendants or representatives
of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization not identified in this notice
that wish to request transfer of control
of these human remains and associated
funerary objects should submit a written
request with information in support of
the request to Dr. George Sabo, Arkansas
Archeological Survey, 2475 N Hatch
Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704,
telephone (479) 575–3556, email gsabo@
uark.edu, by November 12, 2019. After
that date, if no additional requestors
have come forward, transfer of control
of the human remains and associated
funerary objects to the Caddo Nation of
Oklahoma may proceed.
The Arkansas Archeological Survey is
responsible for notifying the Caddo
Nation of Oklahoma that this notice has
been published.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Oct 09, 2019
Jkt 250001
Dated: September 13, 2019.
Melanie O’Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2019–22169 Filed 10–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–747 (Final)]
Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico;
Suspension of Anti-Dumping
Investigation
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that the final phase of its
antidumping investigation of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico is suspended.
The subject investigation was resumed
on May 7, 2019, to determine whether
an industry in the United States is
materially injured or threatened with
material injury, or the establishment of
an industry in the United States is
materially retarded, by reason of
imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico
preliminarily determined by the
Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’)
to be sold at less than fair value
(‘‘LTFV’’) (84 FR 27805, June 14, 2019).
On September 24, 2019, Commerce
published notice in the Federal Register
of the suspension of its antidumping
investigation on fresh tomatoes from
Mexico (84 FR 49987). The basis for the
suspension is an agreement between
Commerce and representatives of
Mexican producers/exporters
accounting for substantially all fresh
tomatoes imported from Mexico into the
United States.
DATES: September 24, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher W. Robinson (202–205–
2542), Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54639
On April
1, 1996, the Commission instituted a
preliminary antidumping investigation
in response to a petition filed by the
Florida Tomato Growers Exchange,
Orlando, FL; Florida Fruit and
Vegetable Association, Orlando, FL;
Florida Farm Bureau Federation,
Gainesville, FL; South Carolina Tomato
Association, Inc., Charleston, SC;
Gadsden County Tomato Growers
Association, Inc., Quincy, FL;
Accomack County Farm Bureau,
Accomack, VA; Florida Tomato
Exchange, Orlando, FL; Bob Crawford,
Commissioner of Agriculture, Florida
Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services, Tallahassee, FL;
and the Ad Hoc Group of Florida,
California, Georgia, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia
Tomato Growers (61 FR 15968, April 10,
1996). On May 16, 1996, the
Commission notified Commerce of its
affirmative preliminary injury
determination (61 FR 28891, June 6,
1996). On October 28, 1996, Commerce
preliminarily determined that imports
of fresh tomatoes from Mexico were
being sold at LTFV in the United States
(61 FR 56608, November 1, 1996). Also
on October 28, 1996, Commerce and
certain growers/exporters of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico signed a final
suspension agreement (61 FR 56618,
November 1, 1996). Accordingly,
effective November 1, 1996, the
Commission suspended its antidumping
investigation (61 FR 58217, November
13, 1996).
On October 1, 2001, Commerce
initiated and the Commission instituted
their first five-year reviews to determine
whether termination of the suspended
investigation on fresh tomatoes from
Mexico would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of material
injury (66 FR 49926, 66 FR 49975). On
July 30, 2002, Commerce terminated the
suspension agreement and its first
review and resumed its antidumping
investigation (67 FR 50858, August 6,
2002). Accordingly, the Commission
terminated its first review on July 30,
2002 (67 FR 53361, August 15, 2002)
and resumed its antidumping
investigation (67 FR 56854, September
5, 2002). On December 16, 2002,
Commerce and the Commission
suspended their resumed antidumping
investigations when Commerce signed a
new suspension agreement with certain
growers/exporters of fresh tomatoes
from Mexico (67 FR 77044; 67 FR
78815, December 26, 2002).
On November 1, 2007, Commerce
initiated and the Commission instituted
their second five-year reviews of the
suspended investigation (72 FR 61861,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
54640
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2019 / Notices
72 FR 61905). Commerce terminated the
suspension agreement and its second
review and resumed its antidumping
investigation, effective January 18, 2008
(73 FR 2887, January 16, 2008). The
Commission consequently terminated
its second review of the suspended
investigation and resumed its
antidumping investigation, effective
January 18, 2008 (73 FR 5869, January
31, 2008). The antidumping
investigation was suspended effective
January 22, 2008, when Commerce
signed a new suspension agreement
with certain growers/exporters of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico (73 FR 4831,
January 28, 2008; 73 FR 7762, February
11, 2008).
On December 3, 2012, Commerce
initiated and the Commission instituted
their third five-year reviews of the
suspended investigation (77 FR 71684,
77 FR 71629). On March 1, 2013,
Commerce terminated the suspension
agreement and its third review and
resumed its antidumping investigation
(78 FR 14771, March 7, 2013). On March
4, 2013, the Commission terminated its
third review and resumed its
antidumping investigation (78 FR
16529, March 15, 2013). Also on March
4, 2013, Commerce signed a new
suspension agreement with certain
grower/exporters of fresh tomatoes from
Mexico and suspended its antidumping
investigation (78 FR 14967, March 8,
2013). Effective March 4, 2013, the
Commission suspended its antidumping
investigation (78 FR 16529, March 15,
2013).
On February 1, 2018, Commerce
initiated and the Commission instituted
their fourth five-year reviews of the
suspended investigation (83 FR 4641, 83
FR 4676). On May 7, 2019, Commerce
terminated the suspension agreement
and resumed its antidumping
investigation (84 FR 20858, May 13,
2019). Effective May 7, 2019, the
Commission terminated its fourth
review (84 FR 21360, May 14, 2019) and
resumed its antidumping investigation
(84 FR 27805, June 14, 2019). On
September 24, 2019, Commerce
published notice in the Federal Register
suspending its antidumping
investigation on the basis of an
agreement between Commerce and
signatory producers/exporters
accounting for substantially all imports
of fresh tomatoes from Mexico that
eliminates completely the injurious
effects of exports of the subject
merchandise to the United States (84 FR
49987). Accordingly, the Commission
now provides notice of the suspension
of its antidumping investigation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Oct 09, 2019
Jkt 250001
Authority: This investigation is being
suspended under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to section
207.40(b) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.40(b)).
This notice is published pursuant to section
201.10 of the Commission’s rules (19 CFR
201.10).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 7, 2019.
Jessica Mullan,
Attorney Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2019–22214 Filed 10–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1111]
Certain Portable Gaming Console
Systems With Attachable Handheld
Controllers and Components Thereof;
Notice of a Commission Determination
Finding No Violation of Section 337;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to affirm
the conclusion of the presiding
administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’)
initial determination (‘‘ID’’) that no
violation of section 337 has occurred.
The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation are or
will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15
p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 4,
2018, the Commission instituted this
investigation based on a complaint and
supplements thereto filed on behalf of
Gamevice, Inc. of Simi Valley,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
California (‘‘Gamevice’’). 83 FR 19821
(May 4, 2018). The complaint alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
(‘‘section 337’’), based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain portable gaming console systems
with attachable handheld controllers
and components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more claims of
U.S. Patent Nos. 9,855,498 (‘‘the ’498
patent’’) and 9,808,713 (‘‘the ’713
patent’’). The Commission’s notice of
investigation named Nintendo Co., Ltd.,
of Kyoto, Japan and Nintendo of
America, Inc., of Redmond, Washington
as respondents (collectively,
‘‘Nintendo’’). Id. The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations was not named as
a party in this investigation. Id.
On February 14, 2019, the ALJ issued
an ID in this investigation, finding no
violation of section 337 by Nintendo.
Specifically, the ID grants a motion for
summary determination that Nintendo
does not infringe claims 1, 10, 16, and
17 of the ’713 patent and claims 1 and
16 of the ’498 patent, that claim 10 of
the ’713 patent is invalid, and that the
technical prong of the domestic industry
has not been met for claim 10 of the ’713
patent. Order No. 21 was predicated
upon the ALJ’s earlier issued Markman
order, Order No. 20, setting forth claim
constructions of disputed terms,
including ‘‘retention member,’’ ‘‘pair of
modules,’’ and ‘‘fastening
mechanism[s].’’ Gamevice petitioned for
review of Order No. 21. Nintendo
contingently petitioned for review of the
claim term ‘‘retention member’’ and
additional claim constructions not at
issue in Order No. 21. The parties
responded to the respective petitions.
On April 25, 2019, the Commission
determined to review Order No. 21 in
the entirety. The Commission also
determined to review the three claim
constructions, discussed in Order No.
20, on which Order No. 21 is based.
Notice, Commission Determination to
Review Order No. 21 in its Entirety;
Request for Briefing (April 25, 2019).
The Commission also asked the parties
to brief two issues on review. Id. On
May 6, 2019, the parties submitted their
opening response to the Commission’s
notice of review. On May 13, 2019, the
parties submitted their responsive
submissions.
After considering Order Nos. 20 and
21, the parties’ written submissions, and
the record in this investigation, the
Commission has determined that the
terms ‘‘fastening mechanism[s],’’ ‘‘a pair
of modules,’’ and ‘‘retention member’’
are subject to means-plus-function
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54639-54640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22214]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-747 (Final)]
Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico; Suspension of Anti-Dumping
Investigation
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that the final phase of its
antidumping investigation of fresh tomatoes from Mexico is suspended.
The subject investigation was resumed on May 7, 2019, to determine
whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or
threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in
the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico preliminarily determined by the Department of
Commerce (``Commerce'') to be sold at less than fair value (``LTFV'')
(84 FR 27805, June 14, 2019). On September 24, 2019, Commerce published
notice in the Federal Register of the suspension of its antidumping
investigation on fresh tomatoes from Mexico (84 FR 49987). The basis
for the suspension is an agreement between Commerce and representatives
of Mexican producers/exporters accounting for substantially all fresh
tomatoes imported from Mexico into the United States.
DATES: September 24, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher W. Robinson (202-205-
2542), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 1, 1996, the Commission instituted
a preliminary antidumping investigation in response to a petition filed
by the Florida Tomato Growers Exchange, Orlando, FL; Florida Fruit and
Vegetable Association, Orlando, FL; Florida Farm Bureau Federation,
Gainesville, FL; South Carolina Tomato Association, Inc., Charleston,
SC; Gadsden County Tomato Growers Association, Inc., Quincy, FL;
Accomack County Farm Bureau, Accomack, VA; Florida Tomato Exchange,
Orlando, FL; Bob Crawford, Commissioner of Agriculture, Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, FL; and
the Ad Hoc Group of Florida, California, Georgia, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia Tomato Growers (61 FR 15968, April
10, 1996). On May 16, 1996, the Commission notified Commerce of its
affirmative preliminary injury determination (61 FR 28891, June 6,
1996). On October 28, 1996, Commerce preliminarily determined that
imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico were being sold at LTFV in the
United States (61 FR 56608, November 1, 1996). Also on October 28,
1996, Commerce and certain growers/exporters of fresh tomatoes from
Mexico signed a final suspension agreement (61 FR 56618, November 1,
1996). Accordingly, effective November 1, 1996, the Commission
suspended its antidumping investigation (61 FR 58217, November 13,
1996).
On October 1, 2001, Commerce initiated and the Commission
instituted their first five-year reviews to determine whether
termination of the suspended investigation on fresh tomatoes from
Mexico would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material
injury (66 FR 49926, 66 FR 49975). On July 30, 2002, Commerce
terminated the suspension agreement and its first review and resumed
its antidumping investigation (67 FR 50858, August 6, 2002).
Accordingly, the Commission terminated its first review on July 30,
2002 (67 FR 53361, August 15, 2002) and resumed its antidumping
investigation (67 FR 56854, September 5, 2002). On December 16, 2002,
Commerce and the Commission suspended their resumed antidumping
investigations when Commerce signed a new suspension agreement with
certain growers/exporters of fresh tomatoes from Mexico (67 FR 77044;
67 FR 78815, December 26, 2002).
On November 1, 2007, Commerce initiated and the Commission
instituted their second five-year reviews of the suspended
investigation (72 FR 61861,
[[Page 54640]]
72 FR 61905). Commerce terminated the suspension agreement and its
second review and resumed its antidumping investigation, effective
January 18, 2008 (73 FR 2887, January 16, 2008). The Commission
consequently terminated its second review of the suspended
investigation and resumed its antidumping investigation, effective
January 18, 2008 (73 FR 5869, January 31, 2008). The antidumping
investigation was suspended effective January 22, 2008, when Commerce
signed a new suspension agreement with certain growers/exporters of
fresh tomatoes from Mexico (73 FR 4831, January 28, 2008; 73 FR 7762,
February 11, 2008).
On December 3, 2012, Commerce initiated and the Commission
instituted their third five-year reviews of the suspended investigation
(77 FR 71684, 77 FR 71629). On March 1, 2013, Commerce terminated the
suspension agreement and its third review and resumed its antidumping
investigation (78 FR 14771, March 7, 2013). On March 4, 2013, the
Commission terminated its third review and resumed its antidumping
investigation (78 FR 16529, March 15, 2013). Also on March 4, 2013,
Commerce signed a new suspension agreement with certain grower/
exporters of fresh tomatoes from Mexico and suspended its antidumping
investigation (78 FR 14967, March 8, 2013). Effective March 4, 2013,
the Commission suspended its antidumping investigation (78 FR 16529,
March 15, 2013).
On February 1, 2018, Commerce initiated and the Commission
instituted their fourth five-year reviews of the suspended
investigation (83 FR 4641, 83 FR 4676). On May 7, 2019, Commerce
terminated the suspension agreement and resumed its antidumping
investigation (84 FR 20858, May 13, 2019). Effective May 7, 2019, the
Commission terminated its fourth review (84 FR 21360, May 14, 2019) and
resumed its antidumping investigation (84 FR 27805, June 14, 2019). On
September 24, 2019, Commerce published notice in the Federal Register
suspending its antidumping investigation on the basis of an agreement
between Commerce and signatory producers/exporters accounting for
substantially all imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico that eliminates
completely the injurious effects of exports of the subject merchandise
to the United States (84 FR 49987). Accordingly, the Commission now
provides notice of the suspension of its antidumping investigation.
Authority: This investigation is being suspended under
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to
section 207.40(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 207.40(b)). This notice is published pursuant to
section 201.10 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 201.10).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 7, 2019.
Jessica Mullan,
Attorney Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2019-22214 Filed 10-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P