Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 54587-54589 [2019-22204]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2019 / Notices
www.regulations.gov. All comments
received are part of the public record.
No comments will be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov for public viewing
until after the comment period has
closed. Comments will generally be
posted without change. All Personally
Identifiable Information (for example,
name and address) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to William Abriatis, U.S.
Census Bureau, EID, CENHQ, Room
7K181, 4600 Silver Hill Road,
Washington, DC 20233, telephone (301)
763–3686 (or via the internet at
William.M.Abriatis@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The U.S. Census Bureau plans to
request a three-year extension of the
current Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) clearance of the
Questionnaire for Building Permit
Official (SOC–QBPO). The Census
Bureau uses the Computer-Assisted
Personal Interviewing (CAPI) electronic
questionnaire SOC–QBPO to collect
information from state and local
building permit officials on: (1) The
types of residential permits they issue,
(2) the length of time a permit is valid,
(3) how they store permits, and (4) the
geographic coverage of the permit
system. We need this information to
carry out the sampling for the Survey of
Housing Starts, Sales, and Completions
(OMB number 0607–0110), also known
as Survey of Construction (SOC). The
SOC provides widely used measures of
construction activity, including the
Principal Economic Indicators New
Residential Construction and New
Residential Sales.
The current OMB clearance is
scheduled to expire on May 31, 2020.
We will continue to use the current
CAPI questionnaire. The overall length
of the interview and the sample size
will not change.
conducts the interview with office staff,
and completes this electronic form.
III. Data
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2019–22124 Filed 10–9–19; 8:45 am]
The Census Bureau uses its field
representatives to obtain information on
the operating procedures of a permit
office using the SOC–QBPO. The field
representative visits the permit office,
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
19:50 Oct 09, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–807]
OMB Control Number: 0607–0125.
Form Number(s): SOC–QBPO.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: State and local
Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,017.
Estimated Time per Response: 15
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 254 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0 (This is not the cost of
respondents’ time, but the indirect costs
respondents may incur for such things
as purchases of specialized software or
hardware needed to report, or
expenditures for accounting or records
maintenance services required
specifically by the collection.)
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.
Section 131 and 182.
II. Method of Collection
VerDate Sep<11>2014
54587
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
Pipe From the United Arab Emirates:
Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is amending the final
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty (AD) order on
circular welded carbon-quality steel
pipe (CWP) from the United Arab
Emirates (UAE) to correct a ministerial
error.
DATES: Applicable October 10, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manuel Rey or Whitley Herndon, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5518 or (202) 482–6274,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 27, 2019, Commerce
published the Final Results of the 2016–
2017 administrative review of CWP
from the UAE in the Federal Register.1
On August 28, 2019, Ajmal Steel Tubes
& Pipes Ind. L.L.C./Noble Steel
Industries L.L.C. (collectively, Ajmal
Steel), one of two companies selected
for individual examination in this
administrative review, alleged the
existence of a ministerial error in
Commerce’s Final Results.2
Legal Framework
A ministerial error, as defined in
section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), includes ‘‘errors
in addition, subtraction, or other
arithmetic function, clerical errors
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any other
type of unintentional error which the
administering authority considers
1 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
2017, 84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019) (Final
Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (IDM).
2 See Ajmal Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Review of Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
Pipe from the United Arab Emirates; Correction of
Clerical or Ministerial Errors,’’ dated August 28,
2019.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
54588
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2019 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
Exporter/producer
requirements will be effective
retroactively for all shipments of the
subject merchandise entered, or
Abu Dhabi Metal Pipes and Prowithdrawn from warehouse, for
files Industries Complex ..........
1.74 consumption on or after August 27,
Ferrolab LLC ...............................
1.74 2019, the date of publication date of the
Ministerial Errors
Global Steel Industries ...............
1.74
Final Results of this administrative
Lamprell ......................................
1.74
Commerce committed an inadvertent
review, as provided by section
Link
Middle
East
Ltd
...................
1.74
error within the meaning of section
PSL FZE .....................................
1.74 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f)
Three Star Metal Ind LLC ...........
1.74 deposit rate for each specific company
by failing to correct an alignment error
listed above will be that established in
in certain data fields in Ajmal Steel’s
the amended final results; (2) for
Disclosure
Excel database that should have been
previously reviewed or investigated
We intend to disclose the calculations companies, including those for which
apparent in our review, prior to
performed for these amended final
converting this database to SAS.
Commerce may have determined had no
results in accordance with 19 CFR
Accordingly, we determine, in
shipments during the POR, the cash
351.224(b).
accordance with section 751(h) of the
deposit will continue to be the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), that we
company-specific rate published for the
Antidumping Duty Assessment
made a ministerial error in the Final
most recently completed segment of this
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Results. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e),
proceeding in which the company
Act,
and
19
CFR
351.212(b)(1),
we are amending the Final Results to
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
correct this error. This correction results Commerce has determined, and U.S.
firm covered in this or an earlier review,
Customs
and
Border
Protection
(CBP)
in a change to Ajmal Steel’s weightedor the original less-than-fair-value
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
average dumping margin, and also
(LTFV) investigation, but the
appropriate entries of subject
changes the rate calculated for the nonmanufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
individually-examined companies. For a merchandise in accordance with the
will be the rate established for the most
amended final results of this review.
detailed discussion of the ministerial
recently-completed segment of this
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
error allegation, as well as Commerce’s
proceeding for the manufacturer of the
because Ajmal Steel and Universal
analysis, see Ministerial Error
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
reported the entered value of their U.S.
Memorandum.4
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
sales, we calculated importer-specific
covered in this or any previously
Amended Final Results of the Review
ad valorem duty assessment rates based completed segment of this proceeding,
on the ratio of the total amount of
We are assigning the following
then the cash deposit rate will be the
dumping calculated for the examined
weighted-average dumping margins to
all-others rate of 5.95 percent
sales to the total entered value of the
the firms listed below for the period
established in the LTFV investigation.8
sales for which entered value was
June 8, 2016 through November 30,
These deposit requirements, when
reported. Where an importer-specific
2017:
imposed, shall remain in effect until
rate is zero or de minimis within the
further notice.
Weighted- meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), we
average
Notification to Importers
will instruct CBP to liquidate the
Exporter/producer
dumping
appropriate
entries
without
regard
to
This notice serves as a final reminder
margin
antidumping duties. We intend to
to importers of their responsibility
(percent)
instruct CBP to take into account the
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
Ajmal Steel .................................
1.83 ‘‘provisional measures deposit cap,’’ in
certificate regarding the reimbursement
Universal Tube and Plastic Inaccordance with 19 CFR 351.212(d).
of antidumping duties prior to
dustries, Ltd./THL Tube and
For the companies which were not
liquidation of the relevant entries
Pipe Industries LLC (TTP)/
selected for individual review, we will
during this review period. Failure to
KHK Scaffolding and
assign
an
assessment
rate
based
on
the
comply with this requirement could
Formwork LLC (collectively,
6
result in the Secretary’s presumption
Universal) ................................
1.65 average of the cash deposit rates
calculated for Ajmal Steel and
that reimbursement of antidumping
Universal. The amended final results of
duties occurred and the subsequent
Review-Specific Average Rate
this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of doubled antidumping
Applicable to the Following
assessment of antidumping duties on
duties.
Companies: 5
entries of merchandise covered by the
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
amended final results of this review and
3 See 19 CFR 351.224(f).
This notice serves as the only
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbonfor future deposits of estimated duties,
reminder to parties subject to APO of
Quality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates;
where applicable.7
2016–2017 Antidumping Duty Administrative
their responsibility concerning the
We intend to issue liquidation
Review—Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ dated
disposition of proprietary information
instructions
for
Ajmal
Steel
and
the
concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error
companies covered by the non-reviewed disclosed under APO in accordance
Memorandum).
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
5 This rate is based on the simple-average of the
companies’ rate to CBP 15 days after
margins calculated for those companies selected for
publication of these amended final
8 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
individual review. See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation
results of this administrative review.
ministerial.’’ 3 With respect to final
results of administrative reviews, 19
CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce
‘‘will analyze any comments received
and, if appropriate, correct any
ministerial error by amending . . . the
final results of review. . . .’’
of the Non-Reviewed Companies’ Rate for the
Amended Final Results in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Administrative Review of Circular Welded CarbonQuality Steel Pipe from the UAE,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Oct 09, 2019
Jkt 250001
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
6 This rate was calculated as discussed in a
footnote, above.
7 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the
United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906 (December
19, 2016).
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2019 / Notices
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These amended final results and
notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(h) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: September 30, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–22204 Filed 10–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
description of the events that followed
the initiation of this administrative
review, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum which is hereby adopted
by this notice.2
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Scope of the Order
International Trade Administration
The product covered by the order is
wooden bedroom furniture, subject to
certain exceptions.3 Imports of subject
merchandise are classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045,
9403.50.9080, 9403.90.7005,
9403.90.7080, 9403.50.9041,
9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018,
9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or
7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written product description in the order
remains dispositive. For a complete
description of the scope of the Order,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
[A–570–890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, Partial
Rescission of Review, and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is rescinding reviews for all
but four companies and preliminarily
determines that these four companies
had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the period of
review (POR) January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable October 10, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0835.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our preliminary results of
review, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. A list of topics discussed
in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is provided in Appendix
I to this notice.
Background
After initiating this review with
respect to multiple companies or
company groupings,1 interested parties
timely withdrew review requests for all
but four companies. For a complete
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
12200 (April 1, 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Oct 09, 2019
Jkt 250001
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom
Furniture from the People’s Republic of China,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4,
2005) (Order).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54589
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative, in whole or in part, if
the party that requested the review
withdraws its request within 90 days of
the publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review.
Certain interested parties withdrew
their review requests with respect to all
but four companies or company
groupings for which Commerce initiated
this review 4 by the 90-day deadline,
and no other party requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order for these
companies. Therefore, Commerce is
rescinding this review, in part, with
respect to the companies listed in
Appendix II to this notice. The review
will continue with respect to the
following four companies: (1) Eurosa
(Kunshan) Co., Ltd. and Eurosa
Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (2) Shenyang
Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.;
(3) Sunforce Furniture (Hui -Yang) Co.,
Ltd., Sun Fung Wooden Factory, Sun
Fung Co., Shin Feng Furniture Co., Ltd.,
Stupendous International Co., Ltd.; and
(4) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP)
information, and the no shipment
certifications submitted by the four
companies under review, Commerce
preliminarily determines that the
following four companies did not have
any shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR: (1) Eurosa (Kunshan)
Co., Ltd. and Eurosa Furniture Co.,
(PTE) Ltd.; (2) Shenyang Shining
Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3)
Sunforce Furniture (Hui -Yang) Co.,
Ltd., Sun Fung Wooden Factory, Sun
Fung Co., Shin Feng Furniture Co., Ltd.,
Stupendous International Co., Ltd.; and
(4) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
For additional information regarding
this determination, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. Consistent with
Commerce’s practice in non-market
economy (NME) cases, Commerce is not
rescinding this review with respect to
4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom
Furniture From The People’s Republic of China:
Partial Withdrawal Of Request For Administrative
Review, dated June 27, 2019; see also Kimball
International, Inc.’s, Kimball Furniture Group,
Inc.’s, and Kimball Hospitality Inc.’s Letter,
‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from The People’s
Republic of China: Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review,’’ dated June 27, 2019; and
Guangzhou Maria Yee Furnishings Ltd.’s, PYLA HK
LIMITED’s, and MARIA YEE, INC.’s Letter,
‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s
Republic of China: Maria Yee’s Withdrawal of
Request for Review,’’ dated June 28, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54587-54589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-520-807]
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab
Emirates: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order
on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe (CWP) from the United Arab
Emirates (UAE) to correct a ministerial error.
DATES: Applicable October 10, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Manuel Rey or Whitley Herndon, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5518 or (202) 482-6274,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 27, 2019, Commerce published the Final Results of the
2016-2017 administrative review of CWP from the UAE in the Federal
Register.\1\ On August 28, 2019, Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C./
Noble Steel Industries L.L.C. (collectively, Ajmal Steel), one of two
companies selected for individual examination in this administrative
review, alleged the existence of a ministerial error in Commerce's
Final Results.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the
United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019)
(Final Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
(IDM).
\2\ See Ajmal Steel's Letter, ``Antidumping Duty Review of
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United Arab
Emirates; Correction of Clerical or Ministerial Errors,'' dated
August 28, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal Framework
A ministerial error, as defined in section 751(h) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), includes ``errors in addition,
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type
of unintentional error which the administering authority considers
[[Page 54588]]
ministerial.'' \3\ With respect to final results of administrative
reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ``will analyze any
comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by
amending . . . the final results of review. . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.224(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ministerial Errors
Commerce committed an inadvertent error within the meaning of
section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) by failing to correct
an alignment error in certain data fields in Ajmal Steel's Excel
database that should have been apparent in our review, prior to
converting this database to SAS. Accordingly, we determine, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), that
we made a ministerial error in the Final Results. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.224(e), we are amending the Final Results to correct this error.
This correction results in a change to Ajmal Steel's weighted-average
dumping margin, and also changes the rate calculated for the non-
individually-examined companies. For a detailed discussion of the
ministerial error allegation, as well as Commerce's analysis, see
Ministerial Error Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the United Arab Emirates; 2016-2017 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review--Ministerial Error Allegation,'' dated
concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to
the firms listed below for the period June 8, 2016 through November 30,
2017:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajmal Steel................................................. 1.83
Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd./THL Tube and 1.65
Pipe Industries LLC (TTP)/KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC
(collectively, Universal)..................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies:
\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This rate is based on the simple-average of the margins
calculated for those companies selected for individual review. See
Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Non-Reviewed Companies' Rate for
the Amended Final Results in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Administrative
Review of Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the UAE,''
dated concurrently with this notice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abu Dhabi Metal Pipes and Profiles Industries Complex....... 1.74
Ferrolab LLC................................................ 1.74
Global Steel Industries..................................... 1.74
Lamprell.................................................... 1.74
Link Middle East Ltd........................................ 1.74
PSL FZE..................................................... 1.74
Three Star Metal Ind LLC.................................... 1.74
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these amended
final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Antidumping Duty Assessment
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the amended final
results of this review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because Ajmal Steel and Universal
reported the entered value of their U.S. sales, we calculated importer-
specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the
total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total
entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where
an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis within the meaning of
19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping duties. We intend to instruct CBP
to take into account the ``provisional measures deposit cap,'' in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(d).
For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we
will assign an assessment rate based on the average \6\ of the cash
deposit rates calculated for Ajmal Steel and Universal. The amended
final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the amended
final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This rate was calculated as discussed in a footnote, above.
\7\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue liquidation instructions for Ajmal Steel and the
companies covered by the non-reviewed companies' rate to CBP 15 days
after publication of these amended final results of this administrative
review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective
retroactively for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after August 27, 2019,
the date of publication date of the Final Results of this
administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act:
(1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will
be that established in the amended final results; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies, including those for which Commerce
may have determined had no shipments during the POR, the cash deposit
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this or an
earlier review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently-completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any
previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit
rate will be the all-others rate of 5.95 percent established in the
LTFV investigation.\8\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the
Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping
Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906 (December 19, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO
of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), which
[[Page 54589]]
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These amended final results and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(e).
Dated: September 30, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-22204 Filed 10-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
