The Emergency Food Assistance Program: Implementation of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, 52997-53002 [2019-21665]
Download as PDF
Title 7
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Chapter IV—Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 251
PART 400—GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
[FNS–2019–0013]
Subpart R—Administrative Remedies
for Non-compliance
6. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 400, subpart R, continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o), and
7 U.S.C. 1515(h).
§ 400.454
[Amended]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Stephen L. Censky,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–20865 Filed 10–3–19; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3410–KS–P
16:14 Oct 03, 2019
The Emergency Food Assistance
Program: Implementation of the
Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Through this rulemaking, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (the
Department or USDA) Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) is codifying
new statutory requirements included in
the Agriculture Improvement Act of
2018 (2018 Farm Bill). First, the 2018
Farm Bill requires The Emergency Food
Assistance Program (TEFAP) State
Plans, at the option of the State agency,
to describe a plan of operation for
projects to harvest, process, package, or
transport donated commodities for use
by TEFAP emergency feeding
SUMMARY:
7. In § 400.454(e)(3), remove the
phrase ‘‘Excluded Parties List System
(EPLS) in accordance with 7 CFR part
3017, subpart E’’ and add in its place
‘‘System for Award Management (SAM)
in accordance with 2 CFR part 417’’.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
RIN 0584–AE73
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52997
organizations (EFOs), also known as
Farm to Food Bank Projects. Second, the
Department is requiring TEFAP State
agencies to amend their State Plans to
describe a plan that provides EFOs or
eligible recipient agencies (ERAs)
within the State an opportunity to
provide input on their commodity
preferences and needs. Last, the
Department is establishing the
requirements for the projects to harvest,
process, package, or transport donated
commodities as authorized in the 2018
Farm Bill.
DATES:
Effective Date: This rule is effective
October 4, 2019.
Comment Date: Written comments on
this rule must be received on or before
December 3, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition
Service, USDA, invites interested
persons to submit written comments on
this final rule. Comments may be
submitted in writing by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
ER04OC19.006
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
52998
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
• Mail: Send comments to Polly
Fairfield, Program Analyst, Food
Distribution Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Room 506, Alexandria, Virginia 22302–
1592, (703) 305–2680.
• Email: Send comments to
TEFAPRuleComments@usda.gov.
Include Docket ID Number [FNS–2019–
0013], ‘‘The Emergency Food Assistance
Program: Implementation of the
Agriculture Act of 2018’’ in the subject
line of the message.
• All written comments submitted in
response to this Final Rule with Request
for Comments will be included in the
record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the
substance of the comments and the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be subject
to public disclosure. FNS will make the
written comments publicly available on
the internet via https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Polly Fairfield, Program Analyst, Food
Distribution Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Room 506, Alexandria, Virginia 22302–
1592, or by email at Polly.Fairfield@
usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background and Discussion of Final Rule
With Request for Comments
A. Revisions to TEFAP State Plan
Requirements
B. Farm to Food Bank Project Definition
C. Farm to Food Bank Project Allocation of
Funds
D. Purpose and Use of Farm to Food Bank
Project Funds
E. Federal Share of Farm to Food Bank
Projects
F. Farm to Food Bank Project Reallocation
of Funds
G. Farm to Food Bank Project Reporting
Requirements
H. Cooperative Agreements
III. Procedural Matters
I. Public Comment Procedures
Your written comments on this rule
should be specific, should be confined
to issues pertinent to the rule, and
should explain the reason(s) for any
change you recommend or oppose.
Where possible, you should reference
the specific section or paragraph of the
rule you are addressing. This rule is
effective upon publication. If the
Department determines that comments
received change any provisions of this
rule, the Department will publish a new
final rule in the Federal Register.
Comments received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES) will not be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
included in the Administrative Record
for this rule.
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are
simple and easy to understand. We
invite your comments on how to make
these regulations easier to understand,
including answers to questions such as
the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the
regulation clearly stated?
(2) Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that interferes with
its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the rule (e.g.,
grouping and order of sections, use of
heading, and paragraphing) make it
clearer or less clear?
(4) Would the rule be easier to
understand if it was divided into more
(but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the rule in the
preamble section entitled ‘‘Background
and Discussion of Final Rule with
Request for Comments’’ helpful in
understanding the rule? How could this
description be more helpful in making
the rule easier to understand?
II. Background and Discussion of Final
Rule With Request for Comments
The Farm Bill was signed into law on
December 20, 2018 (Pub. L. 115–334).
Section 4018 of the 2018 Farm Bill
included TEFAP-specific provisions and
modified the Emergency Food
Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 7501–
7516) (EFAA). This rule codifies new
statutory requirements included in the
2018 Farm Bill by amending TEFAP
regulations at 7 CFR part 251. Upon
publication, this rulemaking makes the
following changes: (1) Revises TEFAP
State Plan requirements; and (2)
establishes the requirements for projects
to harvest, process, package, or transport
donated commodities for use by TEFAP
EFOs, also known as Farm to Food Bank
Projects. The amendments are discussed
in detail below.
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) at 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) specifically
exempts rules involving grants and
benefits from notice-and-comment
requirements, giving FNS the authority
to issue final rules in grants and benefits
programs, like TEFAP.1 FNS does,
however, retain the discretion to issue a
final rule with a request for comments,
and FNS welcomes comments on the
specified sections below. The
Department is issuing this final rule
with request for comments to ensure
1 Previous USDA practice pursuant to the
Statement of Policy published on July 24, 1971 (36
FR 13804) was to utilize APA notice-and-comment
rulemaking procedures regardless of the APA’s
stated exceptions, but that memo was rescinded in
2013. 78 FR 64194.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that the provisions in this rulemaking
are implemented as timely as possible to
distribute funds to TEFAP State
agencies for fiscal year (FY) 2020. The
Department determined that prolonging
the implementation of these provisions
would negatively impact State agencies
that administer TEFAP by delaying their
ability to access the funds provided by
the 2018 Farm Bill. As previously
stated, if the Department, upon
consideration of the comments received,
decides to amend any provisions of the
rule, the Department will publish a new
final rule in the Federal Register with
an explanation of the changes.
A. Revisions to TEFAP State Plan
Requirements
Section 4018(a) of the 2018 Farm Bill
modified section 202A(b) of the EFAA
to require that TEFAP State Plans
describe, at the option of the State
agency, a plan of operation for one or
more projects in partnership with one or
more EFOs located in the State to
harvest, process, package, or transport
donated commodities received under
section 203D(d) of the EFAA.
Accordingly, this rule amends TEFAP
regulations at 7 CFR 251.6(a) to include
this new State Plan requirement and to
outline what must be included in the
State Plan amendment for the plan of
operation for such projects. The
Department requests comments on the
regulatory proposal regarding the plan
of operation for a Farm to Food Bank
Project.
The 2018 Farm Bill also modified
section 202A(b) of the EFAA to require
that TEFAP State Plans describe a plan,
which may include the use of a State
advisory board established under
section 202A(c) of the EFAA, that
provides EFOs or ERAs within the State
an opportunity to provide input on the
commodity preferences and needs of the
EFO or ERA. The Department does not
request comments on the regulatory
proposal related to providing input on
commodity preferences, as it is a nondiscretionary change required by the
2018 Farm Bill.
B. Farm to Food Bank Project Definition
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill
amended section 203D of the EFAA and
provides a new section 203D(d) that
establishes a fund for projects to
harvest, process, package, or transport
donated commodities for use by TEFAP
EFOs. This rule adopts the definition of
‘‘project’’ in section 203D(d)(1) of the
EFAA as the harvesting, processing,
packaging, or transportation of
unharvested, unprocessed, or
unpackaged commodities donated by
agricultural producers, processors, or
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
distributors for use by EFOs. This rule
also codifies the common name for
these projects as ‘‘Farm to Food Bank
Projects’’ by adding a new paragraph at
7 CFR 251.10(j)(1). The Department
requests comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
C. Farm to Food Bank Project Allocation
of Funds
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill
amended section 203D of the EFAA to
include a new section 203D(d)(5) that
provides $4 million for each of fiscal
years 2019 through 2023, to remain
available until the end of the subsequent
fiscal year, that the Department must
allocate to TEFAP State agencies that
have submitted a State plan describing
a plan of operation for a Farm to Food
Bank Project. Section 4018(b) also
amended section 203D of the EFAA to
include a new section 203D(d)(2)(C)(i)
which directs the Department to
determine a formula to allocate these
funds each fiscal year.
Thus, the Department is establishing
that the Farm to Food Bank Project
funds will be allocated to States with an
approved State Plan describing a project
by using the current TEFAP funding
formula found at 7 CFR 251.3(h). The
formula in 7 CFR 251.3(h) provides that
the amount of funds to be provided to
each State will be based on each State’s
population of low-income and
unemployed persons, as compared to
national statistics. Each State’s share of
funds will be based 60 percent on the
number of persons in households within
the State having incomes below the
poverty level and 40 percent on the
number of unemployed persons within
the State. The Department is also
establishing a one-year period of
performance for these funds. This
rulemaking adds a new paragraph at 7
CFR 251.10(j)(2) to include this
allocation formula and period of
performance for Farm to Food Bank
Project funds. The Department requests
comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
D. Purpose and Use of Farm to Food
Bank Project Funds
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill
amended section 203D of the EFAA to
include a new section 203D(d)(3) that
describes the purpose of Farm to Food
Bank Projects as (1) reducing food waste
at the agricultural production,
processing, or distribution level through
the donation of food; (2) providing food
to individuals in need; and (3) building
relationships between agricultural
producers, processors, and distributors
and EFOs through the donation of food.
This rulemaking adopts this language. It
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
also provides that Farm to Food Bank
Project funds may only be used for costs
associated with carrying out a Farm to
Food Bank Project for the above purpose
and cannot be used to purchase foods or
for agricultural production activities
such as purchasing seeds or planting
crops. Thus, this rulemaking adds a new
paragraph at 7 CFR 251.10(j)(3) that
includes the purpose and use of Farm to
Food Bank Project funds. The
Department requests comments on this
section of the rulemaking.
E. Federal Share of Farm to Food Bank
Projects
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill
amended section 203D of the EFAA to
include a new section 203D(d)(2)(B) that
requires that the Federal share of the
cost of a Farm to Food Bank Project not
exceed 50% of the total cost of the
project. Therefore, the Department is
requiring that TEFAP State agencies that
receive funding for Farm to Food Bank
Projects under this Part provide a cash
or in-kind contribution equal to the
amount of Federal funding received.
Allowable contributions for the match
must be used for the Farm to Food Bank
Project purpose described in
§ 251.10(j)(3) and meet the requirements
in § 251.9(c). These contributions may
include, but are not limited to, cash or
in-kind contributions from EFOs that
partner with the State agency in
administering the Farm to Food Bank
Project. This rule also codifies that food
donations, including foods donated
under a Farm to Food Bank Project,
cannot count toward the match
requirement. Thus, this rulemaking
establishes a new paragraph at 7 CFR
251.10(j)(4) to include the match
requirement for Farm to Food Bank
Projects. The Department requests
comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
F. Farm to Food Bank Project
Reallocation of Funds
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill
amended section 203D of the EFAA to
include a new section 203D(d)(2)(C)(ii)
that requires the Department to
reallocate Farm to Food Bank Project
funds if the Secretary determines that a
State will not expend all of the funds
allocated to it for a fiscal year. The
Department is further directed to
reallocate the unexpended funds to
other States that have submitted a State
Plan with a Farm to Food Bank Project
plan of operation for a project during
that fiscal year or the subsequent fiscal
year as the Secretary deems appropriate.
This rulemaking establishes a new
paragraph at 7 CFR 251.10(j)(5) to
include reallocation of unexpended
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52999
Farm to Food Bank Project funds to
States with an approved State Plan with
a Farm to Food Bank Project plan of
operation. The Department requests
comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
G. Farm to Food Bank Project Reporting
Requirements
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill
amends section 203D of the EFAA to
include a new section 203D(d)(2)(C)(iii)
that requires that each State receiving
Farm to Food Bank Project funds for a
fiscal year submit financial reports to
the Department on a regular basis which
describe the use of the funds. The
Department is requiring that Farm to
Food Bank Project financial reports be
submitted on a semiannual basis using
the SF–425 form. This rulemaking
therefore establishes a new paragraph at
7 CFR 251.10(j)(6) to include these
reporting requirements. The Department
requests comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
H. Cooperative Agreements
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill
amended section 203D of the EFAA to
include a new section 203D(d)(4) which
allows the Department to encourage a
State agency that carries out a Farm to
Food Bank Project to enter into
cooperative agreements with State
agencies of other States to maximize the
use of commodities donated under the
project. This rulemaking therefore
establishes a new paragraph at 7 CFR
251.10(j)(7) to include this provision.
The Department requests comments on
this section of the rulemaking.
Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This final
rule with request for comments has been
determined to be not significant and
was not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
53000
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
more in any one year. Thus, the rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
This rule has been designated as not
significant by the Office of Management
and Budget; therefore, no Regulatory
Impact Analysis is required.
Executive Order 12372
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612) requires Agencies to
analyze the impact of rulemaking on
small entities and consider alternatives
that would minimize any significant
impacts on a substantial number of
small entities. Pursuant to that review,
it has been certified that this rule would
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule adds additional requirements
for TEFAP State agencies but does not
have a significant impact on TEFAP
ERAs.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13771
Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs and provides
that the cost of planned regulations be
prudently managed and controlled
through a budgeting process.
This rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because it is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
the Department generally must prepare
a written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
the private sector, of $146 million or
more (when adjusted for inflation; GDP
deflator source: Table 1.1.9 at https://
www.bea.gov/iTable) in any one year.
When such a statement is needed for a
rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires the Department to identify and
consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
most cost effective or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule.
This final rule with request for
comments does not contain Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, and tribal governments or
the private sector of $146 million or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
The program addressed in this section
is listed in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance under Number
10.568 and is subject to Executive Order
12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 2 CFR
chapter IV.)
Federalism Summary Impact Statement
Executive Order 13132 requires
Federal agencies to consider the impact
of their regulatory actions on State and
local governments. Where such actions
have federalism implications, agencies
are directed to provide a statement for
inclusion in the preamble to the
regulations describing the agency’s
considerations in terms of the three
categories called for under section
(6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13132.
The Department has determined that
this rule does not have federalism
implications. This rule does not impose
substantial or direct compliance costs
on State and local governments.
Therefore, under Section 6(b) of the
Executive Order, a federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This final rule with request for
comments has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have preemptive effect with respect to
any State or local laws, regulations or
policies which conflict with its
provisions or which would otherwise
impede its full and timely
implementation. This rule is not
intended to have retroactive effect
unless so specified in the Effective Dates
section of the final rule. Prior to any
judicial challenge to the provisions of
the final rule, all applicable
administrative procedures must be
exhausted.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
FNS has reviewed this final rule with
request for comments in accordance
with USDA Regulation 4300–4, ‘‘Civil
Rights Impact Analysis,’’ to identify any
major civil rights impacts the rule might
have on program participants on the
basis of age, race, color, national origin,
sex or disability. After a careful review
of the rule’s intent and provisions, FNS
has determined that this rule is not
expected to affect the participation of
protected individuals in TEFAP.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 requires
Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with Tribes on a
government-to-government basis on
policies that have Tribal implications,
including regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and
other policy statements or actions that
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
USDA is unaware of any current Tribal
laws that could be in conflict with this
rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; 5 CFR part 1320)
requires the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to approve all collections
of information by a Federal agency
before they can be implemented.
Respondents are not required to respond
to any collection of information unless
it displays a current valid OMB control
number.
This rule contains information
collections that have been approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
under OMB# 0584–0293, Food
Distribution Programs, expiration date
November 30, 2019. In addition, this
rule imposes a new requirement to
submit a financial report using a form
that is approved under OMB# 0584–
0594 Food Programs Reporting System
(FPRS), expiration date September 30,
2019. FNS has determined that this rule
impacts these requirements under
OMB# 0584–0293 and OMB# 0584–
0594. Due to the timing of this rule and
revisions that are being made to the
other collections, FNS is including the
information requirements that are being
impacted by this rule as part of this new
information collection. Once this
collection has been reviewed and
approved by OMB and the revisions to
the other collections have been
concluded, FNS will merge the
requirements into OMB#s 0584–0293
and 0584–0594.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, this final rule
with request for comments contains
information collections that are subject
to review and approval by the Office of
Management and Budget; therefore, FNS
is submitting for public comment the
changes in the information collection
burden that would result from this final
rule with request for comments.
Comments on this final rule with
request for comments must be received
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
by December 3, 2019. Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
All responses to this notification will
be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All
comments will also become a matter of
public record.
Title: The Emergency Food Assistance
Program Farm to Food Bank Project
Forms.
OMB Number: 0584–NEW.
Expiration Date: N/A.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: On December 20, 2018, the
President signed the Agriculture
Improvement Act of 2018 (the 2018
Farm Bill) into law. Section 4018 of the
2018 Farm Bill amends section 202A(b)
of the EFAA and adds new requirements
to the TEFAP State Plan. State plans
must now include a plan to provide
emergency feeding organizations or
eligible recipient agencies within the
State an opportunity to provide input on
the commodity preferences and needs of
the emergency feeding organization or
eligible recipient agency. The reporting
burden associated with TEFAP State
plans is currently approved under
OMB# 0584–0293, Food Distribution
Programs, expiration date November 30,
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Sec. of
Regs/Authority
Title
2019. This new requirement would
require all 54 TEFAP State agencies to
submit a revision to their State plan in
the first year of the new requirement. In
subsequent years, the burden associated
with this requirement will be captured
under the existing burden approved
under OMB# 0584–0293.
Additionally, at the option of the
State agency, State plans may also now
include a plan of operation for one or
more projects in partnership with one or
more emergency feeding organizations
located in the State to harvest, process,
package, or transport donated
commodities received under section
203D(d) of the Emergency Food
Assistance Act of 1983. We estimate that
the same number of revisions will be
made to TEFAP State plans as a result
of this requirement and the revisions
will take the same amount of time as
accounted for in OMB# 0584–0293.
There will be no change in burden as a
result of this requirement.
FNS currently estimates a total of 112
burden hours for completing TEFAP
State Plans, with 14 States, each taking
8 hours, to submit such plans. As a
result of this rule, FNS estimates that all
54 States will need to submit a TEFAP
State Plan containing the additional
requirements. FNS estimates that it will
take all of the States an additional 4
hours to incorporate the necessary
information into these plans. Therefore,
FNS estimates a total of 216 burden
hours for these State Plans in the first
year of the requirement. In subsequent
years, FNS estimates that the burden
will remain at 112 burden hours.
Section 4018 of the 2018 Farm Bill
also amends section 203D of the EFAA
to include a new section
203D(d)(2)(C)(iii) that requires that each
State receiving Farm to Food Bank
Project funds for a fiscal year submit
financial reports to the Department on a
regular basis which describe the use of
Form No.
Estimated
number of
responses per
respondent
Estimated
number of
respondents
Total annual
responses
[(d) × (e)]
the funds. While States participating in
the Emergency Food Assistance Program
are required to submit financial reports,
this Final Rule is imposing a new
requirement for states to file financial
reports when they participate in the
Farm to Food Bank Project. The
Department is requiring that the Farm to
Food Bank Project financial reports be
submitted on a semiannual basis using
SF–425 Federal Financial Report. This
form, and its associated reporting
burden, is currently approved under
OMB# 0584–0594 Food Programs
Reporting System (FPRS), expiration
date September 30, 2019. Currently, the
SF–425 Federal Financial Form is
approved with 10,355 responses and
15,533 burden hours. FNS estimates that
14 States will need to file a SF–425 to
report on their Farm to Food Bank
Project funds. As a result of this Final
Rule, FNS estimates a total of 15,575
hours for the SF–425.
Section 203D of the EFAA has been
amended to allow the Department to
encourage a State agency that carries out
a new Farm to Food Bank Project to
enter into cooperative agreements with
State agencies of other States to
maximize the use of commodities
donated under the project. FNS
estimates that 2 State agencies will enter
into cooperative agreements. FNS
further estimates that it will take 1 hour
for each State agency to complete these
agreements, for a total of 2 burden
hours.
Respondents: State Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
54.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.56.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
84.
Estimated Time per Response: 3.10.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 260.
Estimated
total hours
per
response
Estimated total
burden
[(f) × (g)]
Currently approved
burden
....................
54
1.00
54.00
4.00
216.00
OMB#
0584–0293
112.00
Reporting Requirements .......
FNS–425
14
2.00
28.00
1.50
42.00
OMB#
0584–0594
15,533
251.10(j)(7) ................
Cooperative Agreements ......
....................
2
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
Total Reporting ...
...............................................
....................
54
1.56
84.00
3.10
260.00
251.6(b)(6) .................
State Agency Distribution
Plan.
251.10(j)(6) ................
53001
Program
change
due to
rulemaking
0
15,645.00
* 104.00
42
(15,575)
2
148.00
* additional burden for first year only.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Department is committed to
complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the internet and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 251
Food assistance programs, Grant
programs-social programs, Reporting
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
53002
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
and recordkeeping requirements,
Surplus agricultural commodities.
Accordingly, 7 CFR part 251 is
amended as follows:
PART 251—THE EMERGENCY FOOD
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 251
is revised to read as follows:
■
§ 251.10
2. In § 251.6, revise paragraphs (a)(3)
and (4) and add paragraphs (a)(5) and
(6) to read as follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Distribution plan.
(a) * * *
(3) A description of the standards of
eligibility for recipient agencies,
including any subpriorities within the
two-tier priority system;
(4) A description of the criteria
established in accordance with
§ 251.5(b) which must be used by
eligible recipient agencies in
determining the eligibility of
households to receive the Emergency
Food Assistance Program (TEFAP)
commodities for home consumption;
(5) At the option of the State agency,
a plan of operation for one or more
projects in partnership with one or more
emergency feeding organizations located
in the State to harvest, process, package,
or transport donated commodities
received under section 203D(d) of the
Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983.
The plan must include all items listed
in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) through (iv) of
this section:
(i) A list of emergency feeding
organizations within the State that will
operate the project in partnership with
the State agency.
(ii) A list of any State agencies that
will operate the project as a part of a
cooperative agreement.
(iii) A description of the purpose of
the Farm to Food Bank Project that
includes how the Project will:
(A) Reduce food waste at the
agricultural production, processing, or
distribution level through the donation
of food;
(B) Provide food to individuals in
need; and
(C) Build relationships between
agricultural producers, processors, and
distributors and emergency feeding
organizations through the donation of
food.
(iv) The fiscal year in which the
Project will begin operating; and
(6) A plan, which may include the use
of a State advisory board established
under § 251.4(h)(4), that provides
emergency feeding organizations or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
Miscellaneous provisions.
*
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7501–7516; 7 U.S.C.
2011–2036.
§ 251.6
eligible recipient agencies within the
State an opportunity to provide input on
the commodity preferences and needs of
the emergency feeding organization or
eligible recipient agency.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 251.10, add paragraph (j) to
read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(j) Projects to harvest, process,
package, or transport donated
commodities—(1) Definition of project.
These projects, also known as Farm to
Food Bank Projects, are defined as the
harvesting, processing, packaging, or
transportation of unharvested,
unprocessed, or unpackaged
commodities donated by agricultural
producers, processors, or distributors for
use by emergency feeding organizations
under section 203D of the Emergency
Food Assistance Act of 1983.
(2) Availability and allocation of
funds. Funds for the costs of carrying
out a Farm to Food Bank Project will be
allocated to States as follows:
(i) Funds made available to the
Department for Farm to Food Bank
Projects will be distributed to States that
have submitted an approved State plan
describing a plan of operation for a
Farm to Food Bank Project.
(ii) Funds for Farm to Food Bank
Projects will be distributed each fiscal
year to State agencies with an approved
State plan for a project in that fiscal year
using the funding formula defined in
§ 251.3(h).
(iii) Funds will be available to State
agencies for one year from the date of
allocation.
(3) Purpose and use of funds. State
agencies may only use funds made
available under this paragraph (j) for the
costs of carrying out a Farm to Food
Bank Project.
(i) Farm to Food Bank Projects must
have a purpose of:
(A) Reducing food waste at the
agricultural production, processing, or
distribution level through the donation
of food;
(B) Providing food to individuals in
need; and
(C) Building relationships between
agricultural producers, processors, and
distributors and emergency feeding
organizations through the donation of
food.
(ii) Project funds may only be used for
costs associated with harvesting,
processing, packaging, or transportation
of unharvested, unprocessed, or
unpackaged commodities donated by
agricultural producers, processors, or
distributors for use by emergency
feeding organizations.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(iii) Project funds cannot be used to
purchase foods or for agricultural
production activities such as purchasing
seeds or planting crops.
(4) Matching of funds—(i) State
matching requirement. The State must
provide a cash or in-kind contribution at
least equal to the amount of funding
received under this paragrpah (j) for a
Farm to Food Bank Project.
(ii) Allowable contributions. States
shall meet the match requirement in
paragraph (a)(4) of this section by
providing allowable contributions as
described at § 251.9(c); contributions
must only be for costs which would
otherwise be allowable as a Farm to
Food Bank Project cost.
(iii) Emergency feeding organization
contributions. Cash or in-kind
contributions from emergency feeding
organizations that partner with the State
agency to administer the Farm to Food
Bank Project are allowable.
(iv) Food donations. Donations of
foods, including the value of foods
donated as a part of a Farm to Food
Bank Project, cannot count toward the
match requirement in paragraph (j)(4) of
this section.
(5) Reallocation of funds. If, during
the course of the fiscal year, the
Department determines that a State will
not expend all of the funds allocated to
the State for a fiscal year under this
paragraph (j), the Department shall
reallocate the unexpended funds to
other States that have an approved State
Plan describing a plan of operation for
a Farm to Food Bank Project during that
fiscal year or the subsequent fiscal year.
(6) Reporting requirements. Each State
agency to which Farm to Food Bank
Project funds are allocated for a fiscal
year must submit a report describing use
of the funds. The data must be
identified on Form SF–425, Federal
Financial Report, and submitted to the
appropriate FNS Regional Office on a
semiannual basis. The report must be
submitted no later than 30 calendar
days after the end of the period to which
it pertains. The final report must be
submitted no later than 90 calendar
days after the end of the fiscal year to
which it pertains.
(7) Cooperative agreements. State
agencies that carry out a Farm to Food
Bank Project may enter into cooperative
agreements with State agencies of other
States to maximize the use of
commodities donated under the project.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 17, 2019.
Pamilyn Miller,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–21665 Filed 10–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52997-53002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21665]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 251
[FNS-2019-0013]
RIN 0584-AE73
The Emergency Food Assistance Program: Implementation of the
Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Through this rulemaking, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
(the Department or USDA) Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) is codifying
new statutory requirements included in the Agriculture Improvement Act
of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill). First, the 2018 Farm Bill requires The
Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) State Plans, at the option of
the State agency, to describe a plan of operation for projects to
harvest, process, package, or transport donated commodities for use by
TEFAP emergency feeding organizations (EFOs), also known as Farm to
Food Bank Projects. Second, the Department is requiring TEFAP State
agencies to amend their State Plans to describe a plan that provides
EFOs or eligible recipient agencies (ERAs) within the State an
opportunity to provide input on their commodity preferences and needs.
Last, the Department is establishing the requirements for the projects
to harvest, process, package, or transport donated commodities as
authorized in the 2018 Farm Bill.
DATES:
Effective Date: This rule is effective October 4, 2019.
Comment Date: Written comments on this rule must be received on or
before December 3, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, invites interested
persons to submit written comments on this final rule. Comments may be
submitted in writing by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
[[Page 52998]]
Mail: Send comments to Polly Fairfield, Program Analyst,
Food Distribution Division, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 506, Alexandria, Virginia
22302-1592, (703) 305-2680.
Email: Send comments to [email protected].
Include Docket ID Number [FNS-2019-0013], ``The Emergency Food
Assistance Program: Implementation of the Agriculture Act of 2018'' in
the subject line of the message.
All written comments submitted in response to this Final
Rule with Request for Comments will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please be advised that the substance
of the comments and the identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be subject to public disclosure. FNS will
make the written comments publicly available on the internet via https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Polly Fairfield, Program Analyst, Food
Distribution Division, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 506, Alexandria, Virginia
22302-1592, or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
II. Background and Discussion of Final Rule With Request for
Comments
A. Revisions to TEFAP State Plan Requirements
B. Farm to Food Bank Project Definition
C. Farm to Food Bank Project Allocation of Funds
D. Purpose and Use of Farm to Food Bank Project Funds
E. Federal Share of Farm to Food Bank Projects
F. Farm to Food Bank Project Reallocation of Funds
G. Farm to Food Bank Project Reporting Requirements
H. Cooperative Agreements
III. Procedural Matters
I. Public Comment Procedures
Your written comments on this rule should be specific, should be
confined to issues pertinent to the rule, and should explain the
reason(s) for any change you recommend or oppose. Where possible, you
should reference the specific section or paragraph of the rule you are
addressing. This rule is effective upon publication. If the Department
determines that comments received change any provisions of this rule,
the Department will publish a new final rule in the Federal Register.
Comments received after the close of the comment period (see DATES)
will not be included in the Administrative Record for this rule.
Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write regulations
that are simple and easy to understand. We invite your comments on how
to make these regulations easier to understand, including answers to
questions such as the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the regulation clearly stated?
(2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the rule (e.g., grouping and order of
sections, use of heading, and paragraphing) make it clearer or less
clear?
(4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it was divided into
more (but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the rule in the preamble section entitled
``Background and Discussion of Final Rule with Request for Comments''
helpful in understanding the rule? How could this description be more
helpful in making the rule easier to understand?
II. Background and Discussion of Final Rule With Request for Comments
The Farm Bill was signed into law on December 20, 2018 (Pub. L.
115-334). Section 4018 of the 2018 Farm Bill included TEFAP-specific
provisions and modified the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7
U.S.C. 7501-7516) (EFAA). This rule codifies new statutory requirements
included in the 2018 Farm Bill by amending TEFAP regulations at 7 CFR
part 251. Upon publication, this rulemaking makes the following
changes: (1) Revises TEFAP State Plan requirements; and (2) establishes
the requirements for projects to harvest, process, package, or
transport donated commodities for use by TEFAP EFOs, also known as Farm
to Food Bank Projects. The amendments are discussed in detail below.
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) at 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)
specifically exempts rules involving grants and benefits from notice-
and-comment requirements, giving FNS the authority to issue final rules
in grants and benefits programs, like TEFAP.\1\ FNS does, however,
retain the discretion to issue a final rule with a request for
comments, and FNS welcomes comments on the specified sections below.
The Department is issuing this final rule with request for comments to
ensure that the provisions in this rulemaking are implemented as timely
as possible to distribute funds to TEFAP State agencies for fiscal year
(FY) 2020. The Department determined that prolonging the implementation
of these provisions would negatively impact State agencies that
administer TEFAP by delaying their ability to access the funds provided
by the 2018 Farm Bill. As previously stated, if the Department, upon
consideration of the comments received, decides to amend any provisions
of the rule, the Department will publish a new final rule in the
Federal Register with an explanation of the changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Previous USDA practice pursuant to the Statement of Policy
published on July 24, 1971 (36 FR 13804) was to utilize APA notice-
and-comment rulemaking procedures regardless of the APA's stated
exceptions, but that memo was rescinded in 2013. 78 FR 64194.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Revisions to TEFAP State Plan Requirements
Section 4018(a) of the 2018 Farm Bill modified section 202A(b) of
the EFAA to require that TEFAP State Plans describe, at the option of
the State agency, a plan of operation for one or more projects in
partnership with one or more EFOs located in the State to harvest,
process, package, or transport donated commodities received under
section 203D(d) of the EFAA. Accordingly, this rule amends TEFAP
regulations at 7 CFR 251.6(a) to include this new State Plan
requirement and to outline what must be included in the State Plan
amendment for the plan of operation for such projects. The Department
requests comments on the regulatory proposal regarding the plan of
operation for a Farm to Food Bank Project.
The 2018 Farm Bill also modified section 202A(b) of the EFAA to
require that TEFAP State Plans describe a plan, which may include the
use of a State advisory board established under section 202A(c) of the
EFAA, that provides EFOs or ERAs within the State an opportunity to
provide input on the commodity preferences and needs of the EFO or ERA.
The Department does not request comments on the regulatory proposal
related to providing input on commodity preferences, as it is a non-
discretionary change required by the 2018 Farm Bill.
B. Farm to Food Bank Project Definition
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill amended section 203D of the
EFAA and provides a new section 203D(d) that establishes a fund for
projects to harvest, process, package, or transport donated commodities
for use by TEFAP EFOs. This rule adopts the definition of ``project''
in section 203D(d)(1) of the EFAA as the harvesting, processing,
packaging, or transportation of unharvested, unprocessed, or unpackaged
commodities donated by agricultural producers, processors, or
[[Page 52999]]
distributors for use by EFOs. This rule also codifies the common name
for these projects as ``Farm to Food Bank Projects'' by adding a new
paragraph at 7 CFR 251.10(j)(1). The Department requests comments on
this section of the rulemaking.
C. Farm to Food Bank Project Allocation of Funds
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill amended section 203D of the
EFAA to include a new section 203D(d)(5) that provides $4 million for
each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023, to remain available until the
end of the subsequent fiscal year, that the Department must allocate to
TEFAP State agencies that have submitted a State plan describing a plan
of operation for a Farm to Food Bank Project. Section 4018(b) also
amended section 203D of the EFAA to include a new section
203D(d)(2)(C)(i) which directs the Department to determine a formula to
allocate these funds each fiscal year.
Thus, the Department is establishing that the Farm to Food Bank
Project funds will be allocated to States with an approved State Plan
describing a project by using the current TEFAP funding formula found
at 7 CFR 251.3(h). The formula in 7 CFR 251.3(h) provides that the
amount of funds to be provided to each State will be based on each
State's population of low-income and unemployed persons, as compared to
national statistics. Each State's share of funds will be based 60
percent on the number of persons in households within the State having
incomes below the poverty level and 40 percent on the number of
unemployed persons within the State. The Department is also
establishing a one-year period of performance for these funds. This
rulemaking adds a new paragraph at 7 CFR 251.10(j)(2) to include this
allocation formula and period of performance for Farm to Food Bank
Project funds. The Department requests comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
D. Purpose and Use of Farm to Food Bank Project Funds
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill amended section 203D of the
EFAA to include a new section 203D(d)(3) that describes the purpose of
Farm to Food Bank Projects as (1) reducing food waste at the
agricultural production, processing, or distribution level through the
donation of food; (2) providing food to individuals in need; and (3)
building relationships between agricultural producers, processors, and
distributors and EFOs through the donation of food. This rulemaking
adopts this language. It also provides that Farm to Food Bank Project
funds may only be used for costs associated with carrying out a Farm to
Food Bank Project for the above purpose and cannot be used to purchase
foods or for agricultural production activities such as purchasing
seeds or planting crops. Thus, this rulemaking adds a new paragraph at
7 CFR 251.10(j)(3) that includes the purpose and use of Farm to Food
Bank Project funds. The Department requests comments on this section of
the rulemaking.
E. Federal Share of Farm to Food Bank Projects
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill amended section 203D of the
EFAA to include a new section 203D(d)(2)(B) that requires that the
Federal share of the cost of a Farm to Food Bank Project not exceed 50%
of the total cost of the project. Therefore, the Department is
requiring that TEFAP State agencies that receive funding for Farm to
Food Bank Projects under this Part provide a cash or in-kind
contribution equal to the amount of Federal funding received. Allowable
contributions for the match must be used for the Farm to Food Bank
Project purpose described in Sec. 251.10(j)(3) and meet the
requirements in Sec. 251.9(c). These contributions may include, but
are not limited to, cash or in-kind contributions from EFOs that
partner with the State agency in administering the Farm to Food Bank
Project. This rule also codifies that food donations, including foods
donated under a Farm to Food Bank Project, cannot count toward the
match requirement. Thus, this rulemaking establishes a new paragraph at
7 CFR 251.10(j)(4) to include the match requirement for Farm to Food
Bank Projects. The Department requests comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
F. Farm to Food Bank Project Reallocation of Funds
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill amended section 203D of the
EFAA to include a new section 203D(d)(2)(C)(ii) that requires the
Department to reallocate Farm to Food Bank Project funds if the
Secretary determines that a State will not expend all of the funds
allocated to it for a fiscal year. The Department is further directed
to reallocate the unexpended funds to other States that have submitted
a State Plan with a Farm to Food Bank Project plan of operation for a
project during that fiscal year or the subsequent fiscal year as the
Secretary deems appropriate. This rulemaking establishes a new
paragraph at 7 CFR 251.10(j)(5) to include reallocation of unexpended
Farm to Food Bank Project funds to States with an approved State Plan
with a Farm to Food Bank Project plan of operation. The Department
requests comments on this section of the rulemaking.
G. Farm to Food Bank Project Reporting Requirements
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 203D of the
EFAA to include a new section 203D(d)(2)(C)(iii) that requires that
each State receiving Farm to Food Bank Project funds for a fiscal year
submit financial reports to the Department on a regular basis which
describe the use of the funds. The Department is requiring that Farm to
Food Bank Project financial reports be submitted on a semiannual basis
using the SF-425 form. This rulemaking therefore establishes a new
paragraph at 7 CFR 251.10(j)(6) to include these reporting
requirements. The Department requests comments on this section of the
rulemaking.
H. Cooperative Agreements
Section 4018(b) of the 2018 Farm Bill amended section 203D of the
EFAA to include a new section 203D(d)(4) which allows the Department to
encourage a State agency that carries out a Farm to Food Bank Project
to enter into cooperative agreements with State agencies of other
States to maximize the use of commodities donated under the project.
This rulemaking therefore establishes a new paragraph at 7 CFR
251.10(j)(7) to include this provision. The Department requests
comments on this section of the rulemaking.
Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This final rule with request for comments has been
determined to be not significant and was not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in conformance with Executive Order 12866.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of
[[Page 53000]]
Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule as not a major
rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Regulatory Impact Analysis
This rule has been designated as not significant by the Office of
Management and Budget; therefore, no Regulatory Impact Analysis is
required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) requires Agencies
to analyze the impact of rulemaking on small entities and consider
alternatives that would minimize any significant impacts on a
substantial number of small entities. Pursuant to that review, it has
been certified that this rule would not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule adds additional
requirements for TEFAP State agencies but does not have a significant
impact on TEFAP ERAs.
Executive Order 13771
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs and provides that the cost of planned
regulations be prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting
process.
This rule is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because it is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, the
Department generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector, of $146 million
or more (when adjusted for inflation; GDP deflator source: Table 1.1.9
at https://www.bea.gov/iTable) in any one year. When such a statement is
needed for a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the
Department to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the most cost effective or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This final rule with request for comments does not contain Federal
mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector of $146
million or more in any one year. Thus, the rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372
The program addressed in this section is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under Number 10.568 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials. (See 2 CFR chapter IV.)
Federalism Summary Impact Statement
Executive Order 13132 requires Federal agencies to consider the
impact of their regulatory actions on State and local governments.
Where such actions have federalism implications, agencies are directed
to provide a statement for inclusion in the preamble to the regulations
describing the agency's considerations in terms of the three categories
called for under section (6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13132.
The Department has determined that this rule does not have
federalism implications. This rule does not impose substantial or
direct compliance costs on State and local governments. Therefore,
under Section 6(b) of the Executive Order, a federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This final rule with request for comments has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have preemptive effect with respect to any State or local laws,
regulations or policies which conflict with its provisions or which
would otherwise impede its full and timely implementation. This rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect unless so specified in the
Effective Dates section of the final rule. Prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of the final rule, all applicable
administrative procedures must be exhausted.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
FNS has reviewed this final rule with request for comments in
accordance with USDA Regulation 4300-4, ``Civil Rights Impact
Analysis,'' to identify any major civil rights impacts the rule might
have on program participants on the basis of age, race, color, national
origin, sex or disability. After a careful review of the rule's intent
and provisions, FNS has determined that this rule is not expected to
affect the participation of protected individuals in TEFAP.
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with Tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies
that have Tribal implications, including regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. USDA is unaware of any
current Tribal laws that could be in conflict with this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; 5 CFR part
1320) requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve all
collections of information by a Federal agency before they can be
implemented. Respondents are not required to respond to any collection
of information unless it displays a current valid OMB control number.
This rule contains information collections that have been approved
by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB# 0584-0293, Food
Distribution Programs, expiration date November 30, 2019. In addition,
this rule imposes a new requirement to submit a financial report using
a form that is approved under OMB# 0584-0594 Food Programs Reporting
System (FPRS), expiration date September 30, 2019. FNS has determined
that this rule impacts these requirements under OMB# 0584-0293 and OMB#
0584-0594. Due to the timing of this rule and revisions that are being
made to the other collections, FNS is including the information
requirements that are being impacted by this rule as part of this new
information collection. Once this collection has been reviewed and
approved by OMB and the revisions to the other collections have been
concluded, FNS will merge the requirements into OMB#s 0584-0293 and
0584-0594.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this final
rule with request for comments contains information collections that
are subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and
Budget; therefore, FNS is submitting for public comment the changes in
the information collection burden that would result from this final
rule with request for comments.
Comments on this final rule with request for comments must be
received
[[Page 53001]]
by December 3, 2019. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
All responses to this notification will be summarized and included
in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter
of public record.
Title: The Emergency Food Assistance Program Farm to Food Bank
Project Forms.
OMB Number: 0584-NEW.
Expiration Date: N/A.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: On December 20, 2018, the President signed the
Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (the 2018 Farm Bill) into law.
Section 4018 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 202A(b) of the EFAA
and adds new requirements to the TEFAP State Plan. State plans must now
include a plan to provide emergency feeding organizations or eligible
recipient agencies within the State an opportunity to provide input on
the commodity preferences and needs of the emergency feeding
organization or eligible recipient agency. The reporting burden
associated with TEFAP State plans is currently approved under OMB#
0584-0293, Food Distribution Programs, expiration date November 30,
2019. This new requirement would require all 54 TEFAP State agencies to
submit a revision to their State plan in the first year of the new
requirement. In subsequent years, the burden associated with this
requirement will be captured under the existing burden approved under
OMB# 0584-0293.
Additionally, at the option of the State agency, State plans may
also now include a plan of operation for one or more projects in
partnership with one or more emergency feeding organizations located in
the State to harvest, process, package, or transport donated
commodities received under section 203D(d) of the Emergency Food
Assistance Act of 1983. We estimate that the same number of revisions
will be made to TEFAP State plans as a result of this requirement and
the revisions will take the same amount of time as accounted for in
OMB# 0584-0293. There will be no change in burden as a result of this
requirement.
FNS currently estimates a total of 112 burden hours for completing
TEFAP State Plans, with 14 States, each taking 8 hours, to submit such
plans. As a result of this rule, FNS estimates that all 54 States will
need to submit a TEFAP State Plan containing the additional
requirements. FNS estimates that it will take all of the States an
additional 4 hours to incorporate the necessary information into these
plans. Therefore, FNS estimates a total of 216 burden hours for these
State Plans in the first year of the requirement. In subsequent years,
FNS estimates that the burden will remain at 112 burden hours.
Section 4018 of the 2018 Farm Bill also amends section 203D of the
EFAA to include a new section 203D(d)(2)(C)(iii) that requires that
each State receiving Farm to Food Bank Project funds for a fiscal year
submit financial reports to the Department on a regular basis which
describe the use of the funds. While States participating in the
Emergency Food Assistance Program are required to submit financial
reports, this Final Rule is imposing a new requirement for states to
file financial reports when they participate in the Farm to Food Bank
Project. The Department is requiring that the Farm to Food Bank Project
financial reports be submitted on a semiannual basis using SF-425
Federal Financial Report. This form, and its associated reporting
burden, is currently approved under OMB# 0584-0594 Food Programs
Reporting System (FPRS), expiration date September 30, 2019. Currently,
the SF-425 Federal Financial Form is approved with 10,355 responses and
15,533 burden hours. FNS estimates that 14 States will need to file a
SF-425 to report on their Farm to Food Bank Project funds. As a result
of this Final Rule, FNS estimates a total of 15,575 hours for the SF-
425.
Section 203D of the EFAA has been amended to allow the Department
to encourage a State agency that carries out a new Farm to Food Bank
Project to enter into cooperative agreements with State agencies of
other States to maximize the use of commodities donated under the
project. FNS estimates that 2 State agencies will enter into
cooperative agreements. FNS further estimates that it will take 1 hour
for each State agency to complete these agreements, for a total of 2
burden hours.
Respondents: State Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 54.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.56.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 84.
Estimated Time per Response: 3.10.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 260.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated Program
Estimated number of Total annual total hours Estimated change due
Sec. of Regs/Authority Title Form No. number of responses per responses [(d) per total burden Currently approved burden to
respondents respondent x (e)] response [(f) x (g)] rulemaking
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB#
0584-0293
251.6(b)(6)................... State Agency Distribution ........... 54 1.00 54.00 4.00 216.00 112.00 * 104.00
Plan.
OMB#
0584-0594
251.10(j)(6).................. Reporting Requirements... FNS-425 14 2.00 28.00 1.50 42.00 15,533 42
(15,575)
251.10(j)(7).................. Cooperative Agreements... ........... 2 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Reporting........... ......................... ........... 54 1.56 84.00 3.10 260.00 15,645.00 148.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* additional burden for first year only.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Department is committed to complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 251
Food assistance programs, Grant programs-social programs, Reporting
[[Page 53002]]
and recordkeeping requirements, Surplus agricultural commodities.
Accordingly, 7 CFR part 251 is amended as follows:
PART 251--THE EMERGENCY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 251 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7501-7516; 7 U.S.C. 2011-2036.
0
2. In Sec. 251.6, revise paragraphs (a)(3) and (4) and add paragraphs
(a)(5) and (6) to read as follows:
Sec. 251.6 Distribution plan.
(a) * * *
(3) A description of the standards of eligibility for recipient
agencies, including any subpriorities within the two-tier priority
system;
(4) A description of the criteria established in accordance with
Sec. 251.5(b) which must be used by eligible recipient agencies in
determining the eligibility of households to receive the Emergency Food
Assistance Program (TEFAP) commodities for home consumption;
(5) At the option of the State agency, a plan of operation for one
or more projects in partnership with one or more emergency feeding
organizations located in the State to harvest, process, package, or
transport donated commodities received under section 203D(d) of the
Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983. The plan must include all items
listed in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) through (iv) of this section:
(i) A list of emergency feeding organizations within the State that
will operate the project in partnership with the State agency.
(ii) A list of any State agencies that will operate the project as
a part of a cooperative agreement.
(iii) A description of the purpose of the Farm to Food Bank Project
that includes how the Project will:
(A) Reduce food waste at the agricultural production, processing,
or distribution level through the donation of food;
(B) Provide food to individuals in need; and
(C) Build relationships between agricultural producers, processors,
and distributors and emergency feeding organizations through the
donation of food.
(iv) The fiscal year in which the Project will begin operating; and
(6) A plan, which may include the use of a State advisory board
established under Sec. 251.4(h)(4), that provides emergency feeding
organizations or eligible recipient agencies within the State an
opportunity to provide input on the commodity preferences and needs of
the emergency feeding organization or eligible recipient agency.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 251.10, add paragraph (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 251.10 Miscellaneous provisions.
* * * * *
(j) Projects to harvest, process, package, or transport donated
commodities--(1) Definition of project. These projects, also known as
Farm to Food Bank Projects, are defined as the harvesting, processing,
packaging, or transportation of unharvested, unprocessed, or unpackaged
commodities donated by agricultural producers, processors, or
distributors for use by emergency feeding organizations under section
203D of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983.
(2) Availability and allocation of funds. Funds for the costs of
carrying out a Farm to Food Bank Project will be allocated to States as
follows:
(i) Funds made available to the Department for Farm to Food Bank
Projects will be distributed to States that have submitted an approved
State plan describing a plan of operation for a Farm to Food Bank
Project.
(ii) Funds for Farm to Food Bank Projects will be distributed each
fiscal year to State agencies with an approved State plan for a project
in that fiscal year using the funding formula defined in Sec.
251.3(h).
(iii) Funds will be available to State agencies for one year from
the date of allocation.
(3) Purpose and use of funds. State agencies may only use funds
made available under this paragraph (j) for the costs of carrying out a
Farm to Food Bank Project.
(i) Farm to Food Bank Projects must have a purpose of:
(A) Reducing food waste at the agricultural production, processing,
or distribution level through the donation of food;
(B) Providing food to individuals in need; and
(C) Building relationships between agricultural producers,
processors, and distributors and emergency feeding organizations
through the donation of food.
(ii) Project funds may only be used for costs associated with
harvesting, processing, packaging, or transportation of unharvested,
unprocessed, or unpackaged commodities donated by agricultural
producers, processors, or distributors for use by emergency feeding
organizations.
(iii) Project funds cannot be used to purchase foods or for
agricultural production activities such as purchasing seeds or planting
crops.
(4) Matching of funds--(i) State matching requirement. The State
must provide a cash or in-kind contribution at least equal to the
amount of funding received under this paragrpah (j) for a Farm to Food
Bank Project.
(ii) Allowable contributions. States shall meet the match
requirement in paragraph (a)(4) of this section by providing allowable
contributions as described at Sec. 251.9(c); contributions must only
be for costs which would otherwise be allowable as a Farm to Food Bank
Project cost.
(iii) Emergency feeding organization contributions. Cash or in-kind
contributions from emergency feeding organizations that partner with
the State agency to administer the Farm to Food Bank Project are
allowable.
(iv) Food donations. Donations of foods, including the value of
foods donated as a part of a Farm to Food Bank Project, cannot count
toward the match requirement in paragraph (j)(4) of this section.
(5) Reallocation of funds. If, during the course of the fiscal
year, the Department determines that a State will not expend all of the
funds allocated to the State for a fiscal year under this paragraph
(j), the Department shall reallocate the unexpended funds to other
States that have an approved State Plan describing a plan of operation
for a Farm to Food Bank Project during that fiscal year or the
subsequent fiscal year.
(6) Reporting requirements. Each State agency to which Farm to Food
Bank Project funds are allocated for a fiscal year must submit a report
describing use of the funds. The data must be identified on Form SF-
425, Federal Financial Report, and submitted to the appropriate FNS
Regional Office on a semiannual basis. The report must be submitted no
later than 30 calendar days after the end of the period to which it
pertains. The final report must be submitted no later than 90 calendar
days after the end of the fiscal year to which it pertains.
(7) Cooperative agreements. State agencies that carry out a Farm to
Food Bank Project may enter into cooperative agreements with State
agencies of other States to maximize the use of commodities donated
under the project.
* * * * *
Dated: September 17, 2019.
Pamilyn Miller,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-21665 Filed 10-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P