Notice of Availability of the Draft Resource Management Plan and Associated Environmental Impact Statement for the Browns Canyon National Monument, CO, 53168-53169 [2019-21560]
Download as PDF
53168
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Notices
B. May I review comments submitted by
others?
You may view and comment on
others’ public comments at https://
www.regulations.gov, unless our
allowing so would violate the Privacy
Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) or Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
C. Who will see my comments?
If you submit a comment at https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment, including any personal
identifying information, will be posted
on the website. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, such
as your address, phone number, or
email address, you may request at the
top of your document that we withhold
this information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. Moreover, all
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in
their entirety.
II. Background
To help us carry out our conservation
responsibilities for affected species, and
in consideration of section 10(c) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
we invite public comments on permit
applications before final action is taken.
With some exceptions, the ESA
prohibits certain activities with listed
species unless Federal authorization is
issued that allows such activities.
Permits issued under section 10(a)(1)(A)
of the ESA allow otherwise prohibited
activities for scientific purposes or to
enhance the propagation or survival of
the affected species. Service regulations
regarding prohibited activities with
endangered species, captive-bred
wildlife registrations, and permits for
any activity otherwise prohibited by the
ESA with respect to any endangered
species are available in title 50 of the
Code of Federal Regulations in part 17.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
III. Permit Applications
We invite comments on the following
applications.
Applicant: Wildlife Conservation
Society, New York, NY; Permit No.
40902D
The applicant requests a permit to
export one male and two female captivebred red-ruffed lemurs (Varecia rubra)
to Bermuda Aquarium, Museum and
Zoo, Bermuda, for the purpose of
enhancing the propagation or survival of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
the species. The notification is for a
single export.
Applicant: Lawrence Lerner, Staten
Island, NY; Permit No. 43911D
The applicant requests a captive-bred
wildlife registration under 50 CFR
17.21(g) for red siskin (Carduelis
cucullata) to enhance the propagation or
survival of the species. This notification
covers activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
Applicant: University of Kansas
Biodiversity Institute, Lawrence, KS;
Permit No. 677648
The applicant requests authorization
to export and reimport nonliving
museum specimens of endangered
species previously accessioned into the
applicant’s collection for scientific
research. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
Applicant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Mexican Wolf Recovery
Program, Albuquerque, NM; Permit No.
104074
The applicant requests renewal of
their permit to export and re-export live
Mexican wolves (Canis lupus baileyi)
for breeding and re-introduction, as well
as the export and re-export of biological
samples for genetic studies, for the
purpose of enhancement of the species
and scientific research. This notification
covers activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
IV. Next Steps
After the comment period closes, we
will make decisions regarding permit
issuance. If we issue permits to any of
the applicants listed in this notice, we
will publish a notice in the Federal
Register. You may locate the notice
announcing the permit issuance by
searching https://www.regulations.gov
for the permit number listed above in
this document. For example, to find
information about the potential issuance
of Permit No. 12345A, you would go to
regulations.gov and search for
‘‘12345A’’.
V. Authority
We issue this notice under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), and its implementing regulations.
Monica Thomas,
Management Analyst, Branch of Permits,
Division of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 2019–21571 Filed 10–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCOF02400.L16100000.
LXSSC0100000.DO0000.19X]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Resource Management Plan and
Associated Environmental Impact
Statement for the Browns Canyon
National Monument, CO
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended; the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended; and the National Forest
Management Act of 1976, as amended;
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Royal Gorge Field Office (RGFO), Can˜on
City, Colorado, and U.S. Forest Service
(USFS), Pike-San Isabel National Forests
and Comanche-Cimarron National
Grasslands (PSICC), Pueblo, Colorado,
have prepared a joint Resource
Management Plan (RMP) and Forest
Plan (FP) amendment, supported by an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
for the Browns Canyon National
Monument (BCNM) and by this notice
are announcing the opening of the
comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP–FP
amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days
following the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its Notice
of Availability of the Draft RMP–FP
amendment/Draft EIS in the Federal
Register. The BLM will announce future
meetings or hearings and any other
public participation activities at least 15
days in advance through public notices,
media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: Comments related to the
Draft BCNM RMP–FP amendment/Draft
EIS must be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic comments must be
submitted via the BLM ePlanning
website at https://go.usa.gov/xn2eC.
• Hard-copy comments must be
submitted via mail or hand-delivered to
BCNM RMP/EIS, 5575 Cleora Road,
Salida, CO 81201.
Copies of the Draft BCNM RMP–FP
amendment and Draft EIS are available
at the RGFO, 3028 E. Main St., Can˜on
City, CO 81212, at the PSICC Salida
Ranger District, 5575 Cleora Road,
Salida, CO 81201, or on the BLM
ePlanning website at https://go.usa.gov/
xn2eC. Click the Documents & Reports
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Notices
link on the left side of the screen to find
the electronic version of these materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Vieira, Project Manager,
telephone 719–246–9966; address 5575
Cleora Road, Salida, CO 81201; email
blm_co_brownscanyon@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339 to contact Mr. Vieira during
normal business hours. The FRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question. You will
receive a reply during normal business
hours.
The BLM
and USFS have prepared the Draft
BCNM RMP–FP amendment and Draft
EIS to evaluate the management strategy
for resources, resource uses, and special
designations within the BCNM. The
planning area is located in Chaffee
County, Colorado, and encompasses
approximately 21,600 acres. The BCNM
RMP/FP amendment will determine
management for approximately 9,790
acres of BLM-administered surface land
and approximately 11,810 acres of
national forest.
The formal public scoping process for
the BCNM Draft RMP–FP amendment/
Draft EIS began May 14, 2019, with the
publication of a Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register (84 FR 21352). The
BLM and USFS held three open-house
scoping meetings in June 2019. The
BLM and USFS used public scoping
comments to help identify planning
issues and frame the scope of analysis
in the Draft EIS. The BLM and USFS
also used the scoping process to
introduce the public to the preliminary
alternatives and the Draft Basis for
Analysis to obtain feedback on the
alternatives and the analysis strategy.
Major planning issues considered in
the Draft RMP–FP amendment/Draft EIS
are conserving and protecting
monument resources and objects or
values including bighorn sheep,
peregrine falcon, terrestrial and avian
wildlife habitat, cultural and historical
resources, geological features and
riparian values; maintaining monument
values and settings; understanding and
addressing tribal values including
religious and other significant sites;
addressing existing uses such as
livestock grazing; managing for
sustainable outdoor recreation, visitor
growth and visitor enjoyment. The Draft
RMP–FP amendment also considers
decisions regarding wild and scenic
rivers, areas of critical environmental
concern (ACECs), and management of
lands with wilderness characteristics.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
The Draft RMP–FP amendment/Draft
EIS evaluates in detail the No Action
Alternative (Alternative A) and two
action alternatives (Alternatives B and
C). The BLM identified Alternative C as
the Preferred Alternative. This
alternative, however, does not represent
the final agency direction. After the
public comment period closes, the BLM
and USFS will prepare a Proposed RMP
and Proposed FP amendment, which
may reflect changes or adjustments
based on information received during
public comment on the Draft RMP–FP
amendment/Draft EIS, new information,
or changes in BLM or USFS policies or
priorities. The Proposed RMP–FP
amendment may include objectives and
actions described in any of the
alternatives analyzed in the Draft.
Alternative A continues existing
management in the Planning Area, as
reflected in decisions from the Royal
Gorge Resource Area Management Plan
(BLM 1996) and Pike and San Isabel
National Forests; Cimarron and
Comanche National Grasslands Land
and Resource Management Plan (USFS
1984), as amended. In addition,
Alternative A reflects management
direction in Presidential Proclamation
9232. Alternative B focuses on
protecting monument resources, objects,
and values while providing primarily
non-motorized recreation activities,
such as hiking and boating, in a
predominantly primitive and backcountry setting. Alternative B limits
future recreational infrastructure
development while still allowing varied
river-based and upland outdoor
recreation experiences and outcomes.
Alternative C focuses on a wider variety
of river and upland recreation
opportunities in backcountry, middle
and front country settings to enhance
the local economy and quality of life for
residents and visitors. Alternative C
includes protections for monument
resources, objects, and values though
emphasizes more proactive management
of natural resources to address stressors
and drivers, and a wider range of
recreation opportunities and access as
compared with management under
Alternative B. Pursuant to 43 CFR
1610.7–2(b), this notice announces a
concurrent public comment period on
the proposed designation of ACECs. The
BLM analyzed one potential ACEC
meeting the relevance and importance
criteria within the range of action
alternatives:
Alternative B would retain the BCNM
portion of the Browns Canyon ACEC in
its current size (9,755 acres). The
following management would apply:
Avoid rights-of-way, restrict vehicles
and bicycles to existing designated
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53169
roads and trails and prohibit new route
construction, and allow seasonal
wildlife closures.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses, and email addresses of
persons who submit comments will be
available for public review and
disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2)
Gregory P. Shoop,
Acting Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2019–21560 Filed 10–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCAD08000.L16100000.DT0000.
19XL1109AF.LXSSB0010000
(MO#4500137107)]
Notice of Availability of the Record of
Decision for the Approved Land Use
Plan Amendment to the California
Desert Conservation Area Plan for the
West Mojave Route Network Project,
California
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) announces the
availability of the Record of Decision
(ROD) for the West Mojave Route
Network Project (WMRNP) Approved
Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) for
public lands located in Inyo, Kern, Los
Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino
counties, California.
DATES: The California State Director
signed the ROD on October 3, 2019,
which constitutes the final decision of
the BLM, and the Approved LUPA takes
effect immediately.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53168-53169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21560]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCOF02400.L16100000. LXSSC0100000.DO0000.19X]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Resource Management Plan and
Associated Environmental Impact Statement for the Browns Canyon
National Monument, CO
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended; the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976,
as amended; and the National Forest Management Act of 1976, as amended;
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Royal Gorge Field Office (RGFO),
Ca[ntilde]on City, Colorado, and U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Pike-San
Isabel National Forests and Comanche-Cimarron National Grasslands
(PSICC), Pueblo, Colorado, have prepared a joint Resource Management
Plan (RMP) and Forest Plan (FP) amendment, supported by an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), for the Browns Canyon National
Monument (BCNM) and by this notice are announcing the opening of the
comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP-FP amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days
following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its
Notice of Availability of the Draft RMP-FP amendment/Draft EIS in the
Federal Register. The BLM will announce future meetings or hearings and
any other public participation activities at least 15 days in advance
through public notices, media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: Comments related to the Draft BCNM RMP-FP amendment/Draft
EIS must be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic comments must be submitted via the BLM
ePlanning website at https://go.usa.gov/xn2eC.
Hard-copy comments must be submitted via mail or hand-
delivered to BCNM RMP/EIS, 5575 Cleora Road, Salida, CO 81201.
Copies of the Draft BCNM RMP-FP amendment and Draft EIS are
available at the RGFO, 3028 E. Main St., Ca[ntilde]on City, CO 81212,
at the PSICC Salida Ranger District, 5575 Cleora Road, Salida, CO
81201, or on the BLM ePlanning website at https://go.usa.gov/xn2eC.
Click the Documents & Reports
[[Page 53169]]
link on the left side of the screen to find the electronic version of
these materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Vieira, Project Manager,
telephone 719-246-9966; address 5575 Cleora Road, Salida, CO 81201;
email [email protected]. Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at
1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Vieira during normal business hours. The
FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or
question. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM and USFS have prepared the Draft
BCNM RMP-FP amendment and Draft EIS to evaluate the management strategy
for resources, resource uses, and special designations within the BCNM.
The planning area is located in Chaffee County, Colorado, and
encompasses approximately 21,600 acres. The BCNM RMP/FP amendment will
determine management for approximately 9,790 acres of BLM-administered
surface land and approximately 11,810 acres of national forest.
The formal public scoping process for the BCNM Draft RMP-FP
amendment/Draft EIS began May 14, 2019, with the publication of a
Notice of Intent in the Federal Register (84 FR 21352). The BLM and
USFS held three open-house scoping meetings in June 2019. The BLM and
USFS used public scoping comments to help identify planning issues and
frame the scope of analysis in the Draft EIS. The BLM and USFS also
used the scoping process to introduce the public to the preliminary
alternatives and the Draft Basis for Analysis to obtain feedback on the
alternatives and the analysis strategy.
Major planning issues considered in the Draft RMP-FP amendment/
Draft EIS are conserving and protecting monument resources and objects
or values including bighorn sheep, peregrine falcon, terrestrial and
avian wildlife habitat, cultural and historical resources, geological
features and riparian values; maintaining monument values and settings;
understanding and addressing tribal values including religious and
other significant sites; addressing existing uses such as livestock
grazing; managing for sustainable outdoor recreation, visitor growth
and visitor enjoyment. The Draft RMP-FP amendment also considers
decisions regarding wild and scenic rivers, areas of critical
environmental concern (ACECs), and management of lands with wilderness
characteristics.
The Draft RMP-FP amendment/Draft EIS evaluates in detail the No
Action Alternative (Alternative A) and two action alternatives
(Alternatives B and C). The BLM identified Alternative C as the
Preferred Alternative. This alternative, however, does not represent
the final agency direction. After the public comment period closes, the
BLM and USFS will prepare a Proposed RMP and Proposed FP amendment,
which may reflect changes or adjustments based on information received
during public comment on the Draft RMP-FP amendment/Draft EIS, new
information, or changes in BLM or USFS policies or priorities. The
Proposed RMP-FP amendment may include objectives and actions described
in any of the alternatives analyzed in the Draft.
Alternative A continues existing management in the Planning Area,
as reflected in decisions from the Royal Gorge Resource Area Management
Plan (BLM 1996) and Pike and San Isabel National Forests; Cimarron and
Comanche National Grasslands Land and Resource Management Plan (USFS
1984), as amended. In addition, Alternative A reflects management
direction in Presidential Proclamation 9232. Alternative B focuses on
protecting monument resources, objects, and values while providing
primarily non-motorized recreation activities, such as hiking and
boating, in a predominantly primitive and back-country setting.
Alternative B limits future recreational infrastructure development
while still allowing varied river-based and upland outdoor recreation
experiences and outcomes. Alternative C focuses on a wider variety of
river and upland recreation opportunities in backcountry, middle and
front country settings to enhance the local economy and quality of life
for residents and visitors. Alternative C includes protections for
monument resources, objects, and values though emphasizes more
proactive management of natural resources to address stressors and
drivers, and a wider range of recreation opportunities and access as
compared with management under Alternative B. Pursuant to 43 CFR
1610.7-2(b), this notice announces a concurrent public comment period
on the proposed designation of ACECs. The BLM analyzed one potential
ACEC meeting the relevance and importance criteria within the range of
action alternatives:
Alternative B would retain the BCNM portion of the Browns Canyon
ACEC in its current size (9,755 acres). The following management would
apply: Avoid rights-of-way, restrict vehicles and bicycles to existing
designated roads and trails and prohibit new route construction, and
allow seasonal wildlife closures.
Please note that public comments and information submitted
including names, street addresses, and email addresses of persons who
submit comments will be available for public review and disclosure at
the above address during regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2)
Gregory P. Shoop,
Acting Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2019-21560 Filed 10-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P