Elemental Mercury Storage Fees, 53066-53070 [2019-21536]
Download as PDF
53066
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 193
Friday, October 4, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 955
RIN 1903–AA11
Elemental Mercury Storage Fees
Office of Environmental
Management, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
publishes a proposed rule to establish a
fee for long-term management and
storage of elemental mercury in
accordance with the Mercury Export
Ban Act.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested and will be
accepted on or before October 25, 2019.
See section IV, ‘‘Public Participation,’’
for details.
ADDRESSES: Please direct comments to:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Send comments to David
Haught at mercury.mgt.fee@em.doe.gov.
Please submit comments in MicrosoftTM
Word, or PDF file format, and avoid the
use of encryption.
Mail: Send to the following address:
David Haught, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Environmental
Management, Office of Waste Disposal
(EM–4.22), 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Haught, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Environmental
Management, Office of Waste Disposal
(EM–4.22), 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585, Telephone:
(202) 586–5000, Email:
mercury.mgt.fee@em.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Fee Basis
III. Regulatory Review
IV. Public Participation
V. Approval of the Secretary of Energy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
I. Background
Section 5(a)(1) of the Mercury Export
Ban Act, as amended (MEBA), 42 U.S.C.
6939f(a)(1), provides that the
Department of Energy (DOE) shall
designate a facility for the purpose of
long-term management and storage of
elemental mercury generated within the
United States.1 MEBA section 5(b)(1), 42
U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1), further provides that
DOE shall assess and collect a fee at the
time of delivery for providing such
management and storage based on the
pro rata cost of long-term management
and storage of elemental mercury
delivered to the facility. MEBA provides
that the fee shall be made publicly
available by October 1, 2018. MEBA
section 5(b)(1)(B)(i), 42 U.S.C.
6939f(b)(1)(B)(i). The fee may be
adjusted annually, and shall be set in an
amount sufficient to cover costs
described in MEBA section 5(b)(2), 42
U.S.C. 6939f(b)(2), subject to certain
adjustments. MEBA section
5(b)(1)(B)(ii)-(iv), 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1)
(B)(ii)-(iv).
In accordance with MEBA section
5(b), 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b), DOE proposes
to establish this fee after consultation
with persons who are likely to deliver
elemental mercury to a designated
facility, and with other interested
persons. DOE convened teleconferences
during the summer of 2018 and held a
meeting on August 1–2, 2018, in
Washington, DC to discuss
considerations for the basis of the fee for
long-term management and storage of
elemental mercury including length of
time in storage, the cost of eventual
treatment and disposal technology and
different operational scenarios.
Participants included representatives of
generators producing elemental mercury
incidentally from the beneficiation or
processing of ore, or related pollution
1 Elemental mercury stored at the facility will be
classified as a hazardous waste under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act and its
implementing regulations. MEBA Section 3
prohibits the sale, distribution or transfer of
elemental mercury stored by DOE, and MEBA
Sections 5(d)(1) and 5(g)(2)(B) require that the
elemental mercury be stored at facilities having
permits to manage RCRA hazardous waste (with the
exception of waste elemental mercury generated by
certain generators, and which is destined for the
long-term storage facility as allowed by 42 U.S.C.
6939f(g)(2)(D)). Based on the description of
elemental mercury that is destined for and stored
at the DOE long-term storage facility, the RCRA
hazardous waste code U151 applies (see 40 CFR
261.33(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
control activities. DOE also consulted
with members of the Environmental
Technology Council, a private
organization whose members include
persons likely to deliver elemental
mercury to the designated DOE storage
facility, on January 23, 2019. Through
this proposed rule and request for
comments, DOE requests further input
in support of the requirement that DOE
consult with persons who are likely to
deliver elemental mercury to a
designated facility, and with other
interested persons.
This proposed rule would establish
the fee for long-term management and
storage of elemental mercury at the
designated DOE storage facility as
$55,100 per metric ton (MT) 2 plus a
$3,250 fixed fee per shipment. In
accordance with MEBA section
5(b)(1)(B)(ii), 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1)(b)(ii),
this fee may be adjusted annually
according to the factors described in
Section II, Discussion of Fee Basis.
II. Discussion of Fee Basis
The proposed fee is based on the
present value of (1) elementary mercury
storage for a finite period of time; (2) the
cost of transporting elemental mercury
from the storage facility to a treatment
and disposal facility; and (3) the cost of
treatment and disposal. While there is
no current regulatory framework to treat
and dispose of elemental mercury in the
U.S., DOE is assuming a scenario in
which there is treatment and disposal
capacity for high-concentration
elemental mercury waste in the future.
The proposed fee for long-term
management and storage of elemental
mercury is based on a scenario in which
the elemental mercury is assumed to be
stored for fifteen years and then
transported in year sixteen to a
treatment and disposal operation for
disposal. The annual storage cost per
metric ton-year is $810 3/MT. This
annual storage cost is increased by 3.5%
each fiscal year for fifteen years to give
a total cost per metric ton of $15,600.
There is also a receiving charge of
$3,250 per shipment charged by the
storage facility upon receipt. There is a
removal charge of $376/MT. This covers
the administrative cost of removing
2 One
metric ton is 2,204.62 lbs.
annual cost is comprised of the following
cost elements: storage/management cost, dedicated
storage area lease cost, state taxes, and periodic
audits by DOE.
3 This
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
elemental mercury from the storage
facility, which is calculated based on
the receiving charge, increased by 3.5%
each fiscal year for sixteen years. The
removal charge is then allocated on a
pro rata basis using a 15 MT shipment
capacity. These costs are all based on
pricing from U.S. commercial vendors.
The 3.5% escalation each fiscal year is
based on pricing from a solicited offer
to DOE by a U.S. commercial vendor.
The proposed fee also includes the cost
of transportation from the storage
facility to a yet to be determined
treatment and disposal operation
($1,230/MT) and eventual treatment and
disposal ($37,900/MT). The cost of
transportation is based on information
received from entities responsible for
the transportation of elemental mercury
to long-term storage facilities and is
representative of cost DOE could expect
to incur for transportation of elemental
mercury to a treatment facility. This cost
is also escalated at 3.5% each fiscal year
for sixteen years. The transportation
cost is based on the current
transportation cost of elemental mercury
from generators’ sites in Nevada to longterm RCRA-permitted storage facilities.
DOE is using this information as a basis
for developing its cost estimate
assuming a transportation scenario that
uses a similar number of miles traveled.
The cost of treatment and disposal of
elemental mercury is based on
preliminary pricing from a U.S.
commercial vendor and includes all
DOE costs associated with treatment
and disposal. This pricing includes
DOE’s cost for treatment, DOE’s cost for
transportation to a disposal site and
DOE’s cost for disposal. The
transportation, treatment and disposal
costs are escalated using the OMB
Circular A–94 5 year real rate (1.3%).
The cost of transportation, treatment
and disposal are subject to adjustment
using actual pricing when such pricing
becomes available. The resulting cost
per metric ton is $55,100/MT, plus the
aforementioned $3,250 per shipment
receiving charge.
In accordance with 42 U.S.C.
6939f(b)(1)(B), because the designated
facility was not operational on January
1, 2019, the fee ultimately adopted by
DOE after consideration of public
comment shall be adjusted to subtract
the cost of the temporary accumulation
for those generators accumulating
elemental mercury in a facility pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 6939f(g)(2)(B) and (D)(iv)
during the period in which the
designated facility is not operational.
The subtraction will occur after receipt
and approval of invoices outlining
acceptable costs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
In accordance with 42 U.S.C.
6939f(b)(1)(B)(ii), the fee ultimately
adopted by DOE after consideration of
public comment may be adjusted
annually. DOE will adjust the fee by
adjusting the parameters used in
calculating the fee. The parameters
subject to adjustment are as follows:
• Annual cost to store 1 MT of
elemental mercury.
• Number of years that elemental
mercury will reside in storage at the
DOE designated facility.
• Receiving charge.
• Removal charge.
• Cost of shipment from the
elemental mercury storage facility to a
treatment facility, and cost of shipment
from a treatment facility to a disposal
facility.
• Cost of treatment of elemental
mercury, and disposal of the treated
waste form.
III. Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993),
as amended by Executive Order 13258,
67 FR 9385 (February 26, 2002).
Accordingly, this action was subject to
review under that Executive Order by
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of
Management and Budget.
B. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations and the DOE regulations
implementing NEPA, DOE prepared the
following documents analyzing the
potential environmental impacts of
long-term management and storage of
elemental mercury: Long-Term
Management and Storage of Elemental
Mercury Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS–0423, January
2011); Long-Term Management and
Storage of Elemental Mercury
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS–0423–S1,
September 2013); and Supplement
Analysis of the Final Long-Term
Management and Storage of Elemental
Mercury Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS–423–SA–01). The
environmental impact statement (and
the supplemental environmental impact
statement) noted the relevant statutory
provision regarding assessment and
collection of a fee. The assessment and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53067
collection of the fee is part of the
implementation of the proposed action.
C. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that by law must
be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As required by
Executive Order 13272, ‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process (68 FR 7990). DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of General
Counsel’s website: https://
www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/gcprod/
documents/eo13272.pdf.
DOE has reviewed this proposed rule
under the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and
policies published on February 19,
2003. DOE has determined that this
proposed rule, if adopted, will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. In
2019, DOE published Supplement
Analysis of the Final Long-Term
Management and Storage of Elemental
Mercury Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS–423–SA–01) that
updated the expected inventory during
the next 40 years to 6,800 MT. DOE
expects approximately 35—50 entities
to pay the fee. DOE expects that the
majority of the fees paid will be paid by
less than 10 of these entities. The
Nevada Mining Association (NMA)
membership includes the generators of
elemental mercury that are expected to
deliver the majority of elemental
mercury to the DOE facility. DOE
contacted NMA for information to help
determine how many of its membership
qualify as small entities under NAICS
codes 212221, 212222, 212234 and
212299. The information received
showed that there are 31 entities that
fall below the small business standards
versus 2 entities that exceeded the
standard. DOE has determined,
however, that the rule will not result in
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of these small
entities. DOE estimates that the largest
impact would be to entities engaged in
mining that do not qualify as small
entities under NAICS codes. This
impact will vary based on ore grade and
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
53068
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
price fluctuations in the precious metals
market. Another impact would be to
entities that have accepted elemental
mercury for long-term storage awaiting
the start of operations at the DOE
facility. The largest of these impacts are
likely be a one-time expense shortly
after the start of operations at the DOE
facility. DOE estimates that the impact
would range from $55,100 up to as high
as $4.7 million for two to three entities.
A mining entity shipping approximately
15 MT per year would experience an
impact of approximately $830,000
annually. As a result of MEBA,
generators of elemental mercury have
limited disposition options. Generators
can either send elemental mercury that
is being discarded to the DOE
designated facility for long term
management and storage or export for
environmentally sound disposal those
mercury compounds identified in or by
15 U.S.C. 2611(c)(7)(A)–(B) consistent
with 15 U.S.C. 2611(c)(7)(D). However,
export of mercury compounds for
environmentally sound disposal in
another country may also be subject to
that country’s obligations under the
Basel Convention, if applicable, and that
country’s applicable domestic laws and
regulations. Nonfederal generators may
also consider domestic sales of
elemental mercury; 4 however,
international sales are prohibited by
MEBA’s export ban, 42 U.S.C.
2611(c)(1). Although domestic sale of
elemental mercury is an alternative
without a negative economic impact, it
is likely that the supply would exceed
demand and thus that option may not be
viable for some nonfederal generators.
As stated above, for those nonfederal
generators for whom sale is not a viable
option, the available options are sending
the elemental mercury to the DOE
designated facility or environmentally
sound disposal of certain mercury
compounds in accordance with 15
U.S.C. 2611(c)(7)(D). Since the cost of
treatment and disposal in member
countries of the OECD is comparable to
the fee in this proposed rule, and
generators choose this option if it is
more cost effective for them, DOE has
determined that this proposed rule does
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
4 MEBA provides that ‘‘no Federal agency shall
convey, sell, or distribute . . . any elemental
mercury under the control or jurisdiction of the
Federal agency.’’ 15 U.S.C. 2605(f). MEBA provides
an exception for ‘‘a transfer between Federal
agencies of elemental mercury under the control or
jurisdiction of the Federal agency.’’ Id. at
2605(f)(2)(A).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
D. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act
This rulemaking would impose no
new information or recordkeeping
requirements. Accordingly, OMB
clearance is not required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
E. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written assessment of the effects of
any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency regulation that may result
in the expenditure by States, tribal or
local governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million in
any one year. The Act also requires
Federal agencies to develop an effective
process to permit timely input by
elected officials of State, tribal, or local
governments on a proposed significant
intergovernmental mandate, and
requires an agency plan for giving notice
and opportunity to provide timely input
to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. DOE
has determined that this proposed rule
does not contain any Federal mandates
exceeding $100 million in any one year
affecting States, tribal, or local
governments, or the private sector, and,
thus, no assessment or analysis is
required under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform’’ 61 FR 4779 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. With regard to
the review required by section 3(a),
section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988,
specifically requires that Federal
agencies make every reasonable effort to
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly
specifies the preemptive effect, if any;
(2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4)
specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5)
adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues
affecting the clarity and general
draftsmanship under guidelines issued
by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of
Executive Order 12988 requires
executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in
section 3(a) and section 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this proposed
rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The
Executive Order also requires agencies
to have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications. On March
14, 2000, DOE published a statement of
policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR
13735. DOE has examined this proposed
rule and has determined that it would
not preempt State law and would not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibility among the various levels
of government. No further action is
required by Executive Order 13132.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any
proposed rule that may affect family
well-being. This proposed rule would
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
have no impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy, Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001) requires preparation and
submission to OMB of a Statement of
Energy Effects for any significant energy
action. A ‘‘significant energy action’’ is
defined as any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1)(i) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (ii) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy; or
(2) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any significant energy action, the agency
must give a detailed statement of any
adverse effects on energy supply,
distribution, or use should the proposal
be implemented, and of reasonable
alternatives to the action and their
expected benefits on energy supply,
distribution, and use. DOE has
determined that this proposed rule
would not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of OIRA
has also not determined that this
proposed rule is a significant energy
action. Thus, the requirement to prepare
a Statement of Energy Effects does not
apply.
J. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
(44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for
agencies to review most dissemination
of information to the public under
guidelines established by each agency
pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB guidelines were published
at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed
this proposed rule under the OMB and
DOE guidelines, and has concluded that
it is consistent with applicable policies
in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Orders
13771
This proposed rule is not subject to
the requirements of E.O. 13771 (82 FR
9339, February 3, 2017) because this
proposed rule is considered to be a
‘‘transfer rule.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
IV. Public Participation
Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested partied to
submit in writing by October 25, 2019
comments and information regarding
this proposed rule.
Submitting comments via https://
www.regulations.gov. The https://
www.regulations.gov web page will
require you to provide your name and
contact information prior to submitting
comments. Your contact information
will be viewable to DOE Building
Technologies staff only. Your contact
information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment is not processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment.
Persons viewing comments will see only
first and last names, organization
names, correspondence containing
comments, and any documents
submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to https://
www.regulations.gov information for
which disclosure is restricted by statute,
such as trade secrets and commercial or
financial information (hereinafter
referred to as Confidential Business
Information (CBI)). Comments
submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed
as CBI. Comments received through the
website will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments
will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large
volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your
comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment
tracking number that https://
www.regulations.gov provides after you
have successfully uploaded your
comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53069
Submitting comments via email, hand
delivery, or mail. Comments and
documents submitted via email, hand
delivery, or mail also will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov. If you do
not want your personal contact
information to be publicly viewable, do
not include it in your comment or any
accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information on a
cover letter. Include your first and last
names, email address, telephone
number, and optional mailing address.
The cover letter will not be publicly
viewable as long as it does not include
any comments.
Include contact information in your
cover letter each time you submit
comments, data, documents, and other
information to DOE. If you submit via
mail or hand delivery, please provide all
items on a CD, if feasible. It is not
necessary to submit printed copies. No
facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
secured, written in English and free of
any defects or viruses. Documents
should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible,
they should carry the electronic
signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit via email, postal mail, or
hand delivery two well-marked copies:
one copy of the document marked
confidential including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked
non-confidential with the information
believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email or on
a CD, if feasible. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it
according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when
evaluating requests to treat submitted
information as confidential include (1) a
description of the items, (2) whether
and why such items are customarily
treated as confidential within the
industry, (3) whether the information is
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
53070
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
generally known by or available from
other sources, (4) whether the
information has previously been made
available to others without obligation
concerning its confidentiality, (5) an
explanation of the competitive injury to
the submitting person which would
result from public disclosure, (6) when
such information might lose its
confidential character due to the
passage of time, and (7) why disclosure
of the information would be contrary to
the public interest.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
§ 955.3
V. Approval of the Secretary of Energy
§ 955.4
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this proposed rule.
Fees are payable upon delivery of
elemental mercury to the DOE facility.
All fee payments are to be made payable
to the U.S. Department of Energy. The
payments are to be made in U.S. funds
by electronic funds transfer such as
ACH (Automated Clearing House) using
E.D.I. (Electronic Data Interchange),
check, draft, money order, or credit
card.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 955
Elemental mercury, Hazardous waste
treatment, storage, and disposal,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Signed in Washington, DC, on September
26, 2019.
Dan Brouillette,
Deputy Secretary of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Energy
proposes to add part 955 to title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations to read
as follows:
■
PART 955—FEE FOR LONG-TERM
MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF
ELEMENTAL MERCURY UNDER THE
MERCURY EXPORT BAN ACT OF 2008,
AS AMENDED
Sec.
955.1
955.2
955.3
955.4
955.5
Purpose.
Scope and applicability.
Definitions.
Payment of fees.
Schedule of fees.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 955.1
Purpose.
This part establishes a fee for longterm management and storage of
elemental mercury in accordance with
the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008, as
amended, section 5(b), (42 U.S.C.
6939f(b)).
§ 955.2
Scope and applicability.
This part applies to persons who
deliver elemental mercury to the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) designated
facility for long-term management and
storage.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Oct 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
Definitions.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The following definitions are
provided for purposes of this part:
DOE means the U.S. Department of
Energy.
Elemental mercury means the element
with the chemical symbol Hg and
atomic number 80 in its liquid form.
The form acceptable to DOE is at least
99.5% elemental mercury by volume.
DOE will not accept elemental mercury
in environmental media or consumer
products (fluorescent lamps, batteries,
etc.) or elemental mercury in
manufactured items (manometers,
thermometers, switches, etc.).
Metric ton means 1,000 kilograms
(approximately 2,204 lbs.).
§ 955.5
Payment of fees.
Schedule of fees.
(a) Persons delivering elemental
mercury to the DOE facility for longterm management and storage of
elemental mercury shall pay fees in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section.
(b) The sum of the receiving charge,
the cost of storage per metric ton for the
number of years escalating costs
according to the published escalation
rate in storage, the cost per metric ton
to transport elemental mercury to a
treatment facility in the year following
the number of years stored and cost per
metric ton to treat and dispose of
elemental mercury in the year following
the number of years stored. These
values may be updated annually. These
values are posted to the DOE Long-Term
Management and Storage of Elemental
Mercury website (https://
www.energy.gov/em/services/wastemanagement/waste-and-materialsdisposition-information/long-termmanagement-and). DOE will publish
notice in the Federal Register when the
values are updated to inform the public
of the updates.
[FR Doc. 2019–21536 Filed 10–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0702; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–118–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc., Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC–
8–400 series airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a report of a
quality escape in the manufacturing of
the advanced pneumatic detector (APD)
switches, and the presence of
contamination on the switch contact
pin. This proposed AD would require
identification and testing, and
reidentification or replacement if
necessary, of affected APDs. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by November 18,
2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Ltd., Q-Series
Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5,
Canada; telephone 416–375–4000; fax
416–375–4539; email thd@
dehavilland.com; internet: https://
dehavilland.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04OCP1.SGM
04OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53066-53070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21536]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 53066]]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 955
RIN 1903-AA11
Elemental Mercury Storage Fees
AGENCY: Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy publishes a proposed rule to
establish a fee for long-term management and storage of elemental
mercury in accordance with the Mercury Export Ban Act.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested and will be
accepted on or before October 25, 2019. See section IV, ``Public
Participation,'' for details.
ADDRESSES: Please direct comments to: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Send comments to David Haught at [email protected].
Please submit comments in MicrosoftTM Word, or PDF file
format, and avoid the use of encryption.
Mail: Send to the following address: David Haught, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Office of Waste Disposal
(EM-4.22), 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Haught, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Office of Waste Disposal
(EM-4.22), 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585,
Telephone: (202) 586-5000, Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Fee Basis
III. Regulatory Review
IV. Public Participation
V. Approval of the Secretary of Energy
I. Background
Section 5(a)(1) of the Mercury Export Ban Act, as amended (MEBA),
42 U.S.C. 6939f(a)(1), provides that the Department of Energy (DOE)
shall designate a facility for the purpose of long-term management and
storage of elemental mercury generated within the United States.\1\
MEBA section 5(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1), further provides that DOE
shall assess and collect a fee at the time of delivery for providing
such management and storage based on the pro rata cost of long-term
management and storage of elemental mercury delivered to the facility.
MEBA provides that the fee shall be made publicly available by October
1, 2018. MEBA section 5(b)(1)(B)(i), 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1)(B)(i). The
fee may be adjusted annually, and shall be set in an amount sufficient
to cover costs described in MEBA section 5(b)(2), 42 U.S.C.
6939f(b)(2), subject to certain adjustments. MEBA section
5(b)(1)(B)(ii)-(iv), 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1) (B)(ii)-(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Elemental mercury stored at the facility will be classified
as a hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act and its implementing regulations. MEBA Section 3 prohibits the
sale, distribution or transfer of elemental mercury stored by DOE,
and MEBA Sections 5(d)(1) and 5(g)(2)(B) require that the elemental
mercury be stored at facilities having permits to manage RCRA
hazardous waste (with the exception of waste elemental mercury
generated by certain generators, and which is destined for the long-
term storage facility as allowed by 42 U.S.C. 6939f(g)(2)(D)). Based
on the description of elemental mercury that is destined for and
stored at the DOE long-term storage facility, the RCRA hazardous
waste code U151 applies (see 40 CFR 261.33(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with MEBA section 5(b), 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b), DOE
proposes to establish this fee after consultation with persons who are
likely to deliver elemental mercury to a designated facility, and with
other interested persons. DOE convened teleconferences during the
summer of 2018 and held a meeting on August 1-2, 2018, in Washington,
DC to discuss considerations for the basis of the fee for long-term
management and storage of elemental mercury including length of time in
storage, the cost of eventual treatment and disposal technology and
different operational scenarios. Participants included representatives
of generators producing elemental mercury incidentally from the
beneficiation or processing of ore, or related pollution control
activities. DOE also consulted with members of the Environmental
Technology Council, a private organization whose members include
persons likely to deliver elemental mercury to the designated DOE
storage facility, on January 23, 2019. Through this proposed rule and
request for comments, DOE requests further input in support of the
requirement that DOE consult with persons who are likely to deliver
elemental mercury to a designated facility, and with other interested
persons.
This proposed rule would establish the fee for long-term management
and storage of elemental mercury at the designated DOE storage facility
as $55,100 per metric ton (MT) \2\ plus a $3,250 fixed fee per
shipment. In accordance with MEBA section 5(b)(1)(B)(ii), 42 U.S.C.
6939f(b)(1)(b)(ii), this fee may be adjusted annually according to the
factors described in Section II, Discussion of Fee Basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ One metric ton is 2,204.62 lbs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Discussion of Fee Basis
The proposed fee is based on the present value of (1) elementary
mercury storage for a finite period of time; (2) the cost of
transporting elemental mercury from the storage facility to a treatment
and disposal facility; and (3) the cost of treatment and disposal.
While there is no current regulatory framework to treat and dispose of
elemental mercury in the U.S., DOE is assuming a scenario in which
there is treatment and disposal capacity for high-concentration
elemental mercury waste in the future.
The proposed fee for long-term management and storage of elemental
mercury is based on a scenario in which the elemental mercury is
assumed to be stored for fifteen years and then transported in year
sixteen to a treatment and disposal operation for disposal. The annual
storage cost per metric ton-year is $810 \3\/MT. This annual storage
cost is increased by 3.5% each fiscal year for fifteen years to give a
total cost per metric ton of $15,600. There is also a receiving charge
of $3,250 per shipment charged by the storage facility upon receipt.
There is a removal charge of $376/MT. This covers the administrative
cost of removing
[[Page 53067]]
elemental mercury from the storage facility, which is calculated based
on the receiving charge, increased by 3.5% each fiscal year for sixteen
years. The removal charge is then allocated on a pro rata basis using a
15 MT shipment capacity. These costs are all based on pricing from U.S.
commercial vendors. The 3.5% escalation each fiscal year is based on
pricing from a solicited offer to DOE by a U.S. commercial vendor. The
proposed fee also includes the cost of transportation from the storage
facility to a yet to be determined treatment and disposal operation
($1,230/MT) and eventual treatment and disposal ($37,900/MT). The cost
of transportation is based on information received from entities
responsible for the transportation of elemental mercury to long-term
storage facilities and is representative of cost DOE could expect to
incur for transportation of elemental mercury to a treatment facility.
This cost is also escalated at 3.5% each fiscal year for sixteen years.
The transportation cost is based on the current transportation cost of
elemental mercury from generators' sites in Nevada to long-term RCRA-
permitted storage facilities. DOE is using this information as a basis
for developing its cost estimate assuming a transportation scenario
that uses a similar number of miles traveled. The cost of treatment and
disposal of elemental mercury is based on preliminary pricing from a
U.S. commercial vendor and includes all DOE costs associated with
treatment and disposal. This pricing includes DOE's cost for treatment,
DOE's cost for transportation to a disposal site and DOE's cost for
disposal. The transportation, treatment and disposal costs are
escalated using the OMB Circular A-94 5 year real rate (1.3%). The cost
of transportation, treatment and disposal are subject to adjustment
using actual pricing when such pricing becomes available. The resulting
cost per metric ton is $55,100/MT, plus the aforementioned $3,250 per
shipment receiving charge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This annual cost is comprised of the following cost
elements: storage/management cost, dedicated storage area lease
cost, state taxes, and periodic audits by DOE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1)(B), because the designated
facility was not operational on January 1, 2019, the fee ultimately
adopted by DOE after consideration of public comment shall be adjusted
to subtract the cost of the temporary accumulation for those generators
accumulating elemental mercury in a facility pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
6939f(g)(2)(B) and (D)(iv) during the period in which the designated
facility is not operational. The subtraction will occur after receipt
and approval of invoices outlining acceptable costs.
In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)(1)(B)(ii), the fee ultimately
adopted by DOE after consideration of public comment may be adjusted
annually. DOE will adjust the fee by adjusting the parameters used in
calculating the fee. The parameters subject to adjustment are as
follows:
Annual cost to store 1 MT of elemental mercury.
Number of years that elemental mercury will reside in
storage at the DOE designated facility.
Receiving charge.
Removal charge.
Cost of shipment from the elemental mercury storage
facility to a treatment facility, and cost of shipment from a treatment
facility to a disposal facility.
Cost of treatment of elemental mercury, and disposal of
the treated waste form.
III. Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning
and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993), as amended by Executive
Order 13258, 67 FR 9385 (February 26, 2002). Accordingly, this action
was subject to review under that Executive Order by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management
and Budget.
B. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations and the DOE regulations implementing NEPA, DOE prepared the
following documents analyzing the potential environmental impacts of
long-term management and storage of elemental mercury: Long-Term
Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS-0423, January 2011); Long-Term Management and
Storage of Elemental Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS-0423-S1, September 2013); and Supplement Analysis of
the Final Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury
Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-423-SA-01). The environmental
impact statement (and the supplemental environmental impact statement)
noted the relevant statutory provision regarding assessment and
collection of a fee. The assessment and collection of the fee is part
of the implementation of the proposed action.
C. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the
potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the rulemaking process (68 FR 7990). DOE has made its
procedures and policies available on the Office of General Counsel's
website: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/gcprod/documents/eo13272.pdf.
DOE has reviewed this proposed rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. DOE has determined that this proposed rule, if
adopted, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. In 2019, DOE published Supplement Analysis of
the Final Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury
Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-423-SA-01) that updated the
expected inventory during the next 40 years to 6,800 MT. DOE expects
approximately 35--50 entities to pay the fee. DOE expects that the
majority of the fees paid will be paid by less than 10 of these
entities. The Nevada Mining Association (NMA) membership includes the
generators of elemental mercury that are expected to deliver the
majority of elemental mercury to the DOE facility. DOE contacted NMA
for information to help determine how many of its membership qualify as
small entities under NAICS codes 212221, 212222, 212234 and 212299. The
information received showed that there are 31 entities that fall below
the small business standards versus 2 entities that exceeded the
standard. DOE has determined, however, that the rule will not result in
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of these small
entities. DOE estimates that the largest impact would be to entities
engaged in mining that do not qualify as small entities under NAICS
codes. This impact will vary based on ore grade and
[[Page 53068]]
price fluctuations in the precious metals market. Another impact would
be to entities that have accepted elemental mercury for long-term
storage awaiting the start of operations at the DOE facility. The
largest of these impacts are likely be a one-time expense shortly after
the start of operations at the DOE facility. DOE estimates that the
impact would range from $55,100 up to as high as $4.7 million for two
to three entities. A mining entity shipping approximately 15 MT per
year would experience an impact of approximately $830,000 annually. As
a result of MEBA, generators of elemental mercury have limited
disposition options. Generators can either send elemental mercury that
is being discarded to the DOE designated facility for long term
management and storage or export for environmentally sound disposal
those mercury compounds identified in or by 15 U.S.C. 2611(c)(7)(A)-(B)
consistent with 15 U.S.C. 2611(c)(7)(D). However, export of mercury
compounds for environmentally sound disposal in another country may
also be subject to that country's obligations under the Basel
Convention, if applicable, and that country's applicable domestic laws
and regulations. Nonfederal generators may also consider domestic sales
of elemental mercury; \4\ however, international sales are prohibited
by MEBA's export ban, 42 U.S.C. 2611(c)(1). Although domestic sale of
elemental mercury is an alternative without a negative economic impact,
it is likely that the supply would exceed demand and thus that option
may not be viable for some nonfederal generators. As stated above, for
those nonfederal generators for whom sale is not a viable option, the
available options are sending the elemental mercury to the DOE
designated facility or environmentally sound disposal of certain
mercury compounds in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 2611(c)(7)(D). Since the
cost of treatment and disposal in member countries of the OECD is
comparable to the fee in this proposed rule, and generators choose this
option if it is more cost effective for them, DOE has determined that
this proposed rule does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ MEBA provides that ``no Federal agency shall convey, sell,
or distribute . . . any elemental mercury under the control or
jurisdiction of the Federal agency.'' 15 U.S.C. 2605(f). MEBA
provides an exception for ``a transfer between Federal agencies of
elemental mercury under the control or jurisdiction of the Federal
agency.'' Id. at 2605(f)(2)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking would impose no new information or recordkeeping
requirements. Accordingly, OMB clearance is not required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
E. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written assessment of the
effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final agency regulation
that may result in the expenditure by States, tribal or local
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million in any one year. The Act also requires Federal agencies to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected
officials of State, tribal, or local governments on a proposed
significant intergovernmental mandate, and requires an agency plan for
giving notice and opportunity to provide timely input to potentially
affected small governments before establishing any requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. DOE has
determined that this proposed rule does not contain any Federal
mandates exceeding $100 million in any one year affecting States,
tribal, or local governments, or the private sector, and, thus, no
assessment or analysis is required under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform'' 61 FR 4779 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
Federal agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. With regard to the review required
by section 3(a), section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988, specifically
requires that Federal agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure
that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if
any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues affecting the clarity and general
draftsmanship under guidelines issued by the Attorney General. Section
3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires executive agencies to review
regulations in light of applicable standards in section 3(a) and
section 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it is unreasonable to
meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the required review and
determined that, to the extent permitted by law, this proposed rule
meets the relevant standards of Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 10,
1999) imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have federalism implications. Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order also requires
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the development of such
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this proposed rule and has
determined that it would not preempt State law and would not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibility among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any proposed rule that may affect family
well-being. This proposed rule would
[[Page 53069]]
have no impact on the autonomy or integrity of the family as an
institution. Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it is not necessary to
prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy, Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR
28355 (May 22, 2001) requires preparation and submission to OMB of a
Statement of Energy Effects for any significant energy action. A
``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency
that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a final
rule, and that: (1)(i) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (ii) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (2) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any significant energy action, the
agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on energy
supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use. DOE has determined that this
proposed rule would not have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of OIRA has
also not determined that this proposed rule is a significant energy
action. Thus, the requirement to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects
does not apply.
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (44
U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most dissemination of
information to the public under guidelines established by each agency
pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB guidelines were
published at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE guidelines were
published at 67 FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed this proposed
rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines, and has concluded that it is
consistent with applicable policies in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Orders 13771
This proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of E.O. 13771
(82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) because this proposed rule is considered
to be a ``transfer rule.''
IV. Public Participation
Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested partied to submit in writing by October
25, 2019 comments and information regarding this proposed rule.
Submitting comments via https://www.regulations.gov. The https://www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information prior to submitting comments. Your contact
information will be viewable to DOE Building Technologies staff only.
Your contact information will not be publicly viewable except for your
first and last names, organization name (if any), and submitter
representative name (if any). If your comment is not processed properly
because of technical difficulties, DOE will use this information to
contact you. If DOE cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. Persons viewing comments will see only first and last names,
organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to https://www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (CBI)). Comments submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received
through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that https://www.regulations.gov provides after you have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand delivery, or mail. Comments and
documents submitted via email, hand delivery, or mail also will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov. If you do not want your personal
contact information to be publicly viewable, do not include it in your
comment or any accompanying documents. Instead, provide your contact
information on a cover letter. Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information in your cover letter each time you
submit comments, data, documents, and other information to DOE. If you
submit via mail or hand delivery, please provide all items on a CD, if
feasible. It is not necessary to submit printed copies. No facsimiles
(faxes) will be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English and free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email, postal mail, or hand delivery two well-marked copies: one copy
of the document marked confidential including all the information
believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked non-
confidential with the information believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email or on a CD, if feasible. DOE will make
its own determination about the confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential include (1) a description of the
items, (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as
confidential within the industry, (3) whether the information is
[[Page 53070]]
generally known by or available from other sources, (4) whether the
information has previously been made available to others without
obligation concerning its confidentiality, (5) an explanation of the
competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from
public disclosure, (6) when such information might lose its
confidential character due to the passage of time, and (7) why
disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
V. Approval of the Secretary of Energy
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 955
Elemental mercury, Hazardous waste treatment, storage, and
disposal, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Signed in Washington, DC, on September 26, 2019.
Dan Brouillette,
Deputy Secretary of Energy.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Energy
proposes to add part 955 to title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
to read as follows:
PART 955--FEE FOR LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF ELEMENTAL
MERCURY UNDER THE MERCURY EXPORT BAN ACT OF 2008, AS AMENDED
Sec.
955.1 Purpose.
955.2 Scope and applicability.
955.3 Definitions.
955.4 Payment of fees.
955.5 Schedule of fees.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6939f(b).
Sec. 955.1 Purpose.
This part establishes a fee for long-term management and storage of
elemental mercury in accordance with the Mercury Export Ban Act of
2008, as amended, section 5(b), (42 U.S.C. 6939f(b)).
Sec. 955.2 Scope and applicability.
This part applies to persons who deliver elemental mercury to the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) designated facility for long-term
management and storage.
Sec. 955.3 Definitions.
The following definitions are provided for purposes of this part:
DOE means the U.S. Department of Energy.
Elemental mercury means the element with the chemical symbol Hg and
atomic number 80 in its liquid form. The form acceptable to DOE is at
least 99.5% elemental mercury by volume. DOE will not accept elemental
mercury in environmental media or consumer products (fluorescent lamps,
batteries, etc.) or elemental mercury in manufactured items
(manometers, thermometers, switches, etc.).
Metric ton means 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,204 lbs.).
Sec. 955.4 Payment of fees.
Fees are payable upon delivery of elemental mercury to the DOE
facility. All fee payments are to be made payable to the U.S.
Department of Energy. The payments are to be made in U.S. funds by
electronic funds transfer such as ACH (Automated Clearing House) using
E.D.I. (Electronic Data Interchange), check, draft, money order, or
credit card.
Sec. 955.5 Schedule of fees.
(a) Persons delivering elemental mercury to the DOE facility for
long-term management and storage of elemental mercury shall pay fees in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) The sum of the receiving charge, the cost of storage per metric
ton for the number of years escalating costs according to the published
escalation rate in storage, the cost per metric ton to transport
elemental mercury to a treatment facility in the year following the
number of years stored and cost per metric ton to treat and dispose of
elemental mercury in the year following the number of years stored.
These values may be updated annually. These values are posted to the
DOE Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury website
(https://www.energy.gov/em/services/waste-management/waste-and-materials-disposition-information/long-term-management-and). DOE will
publish notice in the Federal Register when the values are updated to
inform the public of the updates.
[FR Doc. 2019-21536 Filed 10-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P