Safety Zone; Hurricanes, Tropical Storms and Other Disasters in South Florida, 52835-52838 [2019-21510]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 192 / Thursday, October 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
effect in excess of 5 percent of total
annual salaries and benefits per
institution, or 2.5 percent of total
noninterest expenses. The FDIC believes
that effects in excess of these thresholds
typically represent significant effects for
FDIC-supervised institutions. For the
reasons provided below, the FDIC
certifies that the proposed rule, if
adopted in final form, would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small banking
organizations. Accordingly, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
As of March 31, 2019, the FDIC
supervised 3,465 insured depository
institutions, of which 2,705 are
considered small banking organizations
for purposes of the RFA. The proposed
rule primarily affects regulations that
govern State savings associations. There
are 36 State savings associations
considered to be small banking
organizations for purposes of the RFA.3
The proposed rule would remove
§§ 390.230 and 390.231, part 390,
subpart M, because these sections are
unnecessary, redundant of, or otherwise
duplicative of other statutes and
regulations, including safety and
soundness standards. Therefore,
rescinding subpart M would not have
any substantive effects on small FDICsupervised institutions.
Based on the information above, the
FDIC certifies that the proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The FDIC invites comments on
all aspects of the supporting information
provided in this RFA section. In
particular, would this rule have any
significant effects on small entities that
the FDIC has not identified?
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Dated at Washington, DC, on September
26, 2019.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–21323 Filed 10–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
3 Based on data from the March 31, 2019, Call
Report and Report of Assets and Liabilities of U.S.
Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Oct 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–105474–18]
RIN 1545–BO59, 1545–BM69
Guidance on Passive Foreign
Investment Companies; Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of hearing.
AGENCY:
This document provides a
notice of public hearing on proposed
regulations under sections 1291, 1297,
and 1298 of the Internal Revenue Code
(‘‘Code’’) regarding the determination of
ownership in a passive foreign
investment company within the
meaning of section 1297(a) (‘‘PFIC’’) and
the treatment of certain income received
or accrued by a foreign corporation and
assets held by a foreign corporation for
purposes of section 1297.
DATES: The public hearing is being held
on Monday, December 9, 2019, at 10:00
a.m. The IRS must receive speakers’
outlines of the topics to be discussed at
the public hearing by Friday, November
22, 2019. If no outlines are received by
November 22, 2019, the public hearing
will be cancelled.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing is being
held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20224. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the
Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present a
valid photo identification to enter the
building. Send Submissions to
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–105474–18), Room
5205, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–105474–
18), Couriers Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20224 or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–105474–
18).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Josephine Firehock at (202) 317–4932
(for the PFIC Insurance Exception) or
Jorge M. Oben at (202) 317–6934 (for
general rules, including indirect
ownership and look-through rules);
concerning submissions of comments,
the hearing and/or to be placed on the
building access list to attend the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52835
hearing, Regina Johnson at (202) 317–
6901 (not toll-free numbers),
fdms.database@irscounsel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject of the public hearing is the
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
105474–18) that was published in the
Federal Register on Thursday, July 11,
2019 (84 FR 33120).
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
that submitted written comments by
September 9, 2019, must submit an
outline of the topics to be addressed and
the amount of time to be devoted to
each topic by Friday, November 22,
2019.
A period of 10 minutes is allotted to
each person for presenting oral
comments. After the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed, the IRS
will prepare an agenda containing the
schedule of speakers. Copies of the
agenda will be made available, free of
charge, at the hearing or by contacting
the Publications and Regulations Branch
at (202) 317–6901(not a toll-free
number).
Because of access restrictions, the IRS
will not admit visitors beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
Crystal Pemberton,
Senior Federal Liaison, Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure
and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2019–21476 Filed 10–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–1067]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Hurricanes, Tropical
Storms and Other Disasters in South
Florida
Coast Guard, DHS.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On June 5, 2017, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to establish a
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
52836
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 192 / Thursday, October 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
temporary safety zone over certain
navigable waters within the Sector
Miami Captain of the Port (COTP) zone.
This safety zone would allow the Coast
Guard to restrict certain vessels from
entering or transiting through certain
navigable waters in the Miami River and
Ports of Miami, Everglades, Palm Beach
and Fort Pierce during periods of
reduced or restricted visibility due to
tropical storm force winds (39–73 mph/
34–63 knots), hurricanes and/or other
disasters. The Coast Guard proposes to
publish this supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) since
considerable time has passed from the
time when the initial NPRM was
published, and because minor
modifications have been made to the
proposed rule. This SNPRM requests
comments on the revised proposal.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before November 4, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–1067 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking contact Mr. Omar Beceiro,
Sector Miami Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard at (305) 535–
4317, or by email at Omar.Beceiro@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
A. Regulatory History and Information
The purpose of the proposed
regulation is to ensure the safety of life
on navigable waters of the United States
by restricting movement of certain
vessels in the event of severe weather
conditions or disasters, including
tropical storms and hurricanes. The
COTP has determined reduced or
restricted visibility and tropical storm
force winds, which may occur during
tropical storms, hurricanes and other
disasters, constitute a safety concern for
anyone within the proposed safety zone.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Oct 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
B. Discussion of Comments on NPRM
and Changes to the Proposed Rule
On May 10, 2017, the Coast Guard
published a NPRM titled ‘‘Safety Zone;
Hurricanes and Other Disasters in South
Florida’’ (see 82 FR 21742). The purpose
of the proposed regulation was to ensure
the safety of life on navigable waters of
the United States within the Sector
Miami COTP zone by restricting
movement of certain vessels in the event
of severe weather conditions or
disasters, including tropical storms and
hurricanes. During the comment period,
the Coast Guard received two
comments, both in favor of the proposed
regulations. One comment; however,
also expressed several concerns. The
commenter expressed a concern that the
proposed rule did not clearly indicate
that the COTP has the discretion to
implement only those measures
necessary given the specific
circumstances of the emergency, rather
than all measures being required. In
addition, the commenter indicated the
proposed rule should clearly state the
application of restrictive measures
would be applied only to those areas
within the Sector Miami COTP zone
affected by the hazardous condition.
The commenter indicated that the
proposed rule should not restrict
operations in other areas of the COTP
zones which are minimally or not at all
affected. Finally, the commenter
suggested that language in the section
heading and text be modified to clearly
indicate the regulation would be
applicable when tropical storm-force
winds are expected. To address these
concerns, the Coast Guard made
changes to the title and text of the
proposed rule to include the use of
‘‘tropical storm’’ when referencing
severe weather and clarified the COTP
may restrict vessel movement only in
ports affected by impending tropical
storm force winds.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
temporary safety zone on certain
navigable waters within the Sector
Miami COTP zone in response to
disasters and/or specified severe
weather conditions (e.g. tropical storms
and hurricanes) that would restrict
movement of certain vessels when the
COTP sets specific Port Conditions. The
movement of certain vessel traffic
within navigable waters of the Miami
River and Ports of Miami, Everglades,
Palm Beach and Fort Pierce would be
affected by this rule. Vessel movement
restrictions would only apply to those
ports within the Sector Miami COTP
zone forecast to experience tropical
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
storm force winds within a specific
timeframe. The proposed rule would
give the COTP flexibility in controlling
and reconstituting vessel traffic during
periods of heavy weather and expedite
resumption of the Marine
Transportation System following
disasters and severe weather.
Port Conditions (WHISKEY, X–RAY,
YANKEE, and ZULU) are standardized
states of operation instituted by the
COTP and shared with all major ports,
facilities, and members of the Marine
Transportation System. The intermodal
and dynamic nature of the Marine
Transportation System requires all
parties to comply with safety and
security procedures when faced with
the challenges of tropical storms,
hurricanes and other disasters.
Notice of Port Conditions and their
requirements will be given via Marine
Safety Information Bulletins, online at
https://homeport.uscg.mil/miami,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and
Severe Weather Advisory Team
meetings.
The revised regulatory text we are
proposing appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This SNPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the SNPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone. Port
facilities and vessel traffic will be
affected by this rule only during limited
times when heavy weather is expected
to make imminent landfall within the
Sector Miami COTP zone. In addition,
vessel traffic would be secured only
during port conditions Yankee and
Zulu, and only in ports potentially
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 192 / Thursday, October 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
affected by tropical storm force winds.
The Coast Guard would issue updates
on homeport.uscg.mil/miami, via
broadcasts on VHF–FM marine channel
16, and during Severe Weather Advisory
Team meetings.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the states, on the relationship
between the national government and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Oct 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
federal government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a safety zone of limited
duration implemented during tropical
storms, hurricanes or other heavy
weather events. Normally such actions
are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) in Table
3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures
5090.1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52837
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments received
during the comment period. Your
comment can help shape the outcome of
this rulemaking. If you submit a
comment, please include the docket
number for this rulemaking, indicate the
specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and
provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this SNPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
52838
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 192 / Thursday, October 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS
AREAS.
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 165.785 to read as follows:
§ 165.785 Safety Zone; Hurricanes,
Tropical Storms and Other Disasters in
South Florida.
(a) Regulated Areas. All navigable
waters, as defined in 33 CFR 2.36,
within Sector Miami COTP zone,
Miami, Florida, as described in 33 CFR
3.35–10, during specified conditions.
(b) Definitions. (1) The term
‘‘designated representative’’ means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders,
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the COTP Miami, in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(2) Port Condition WHISKEY means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained
tropical storm force winds from a
tropical or hurricane force storm are
predicted to make landfall at the port
within 72 hours.
(3) Port Condition X–RAY means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained
tropical storm force winds from a
tropical or hurricane force storm are
predicted to make landfall at the port
within 48 hours.
(4) Port Condition YANKEE means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that
sustained tropical storm force winds
from a tropical or hurricane force storm
are predicted to make landfall at the
port within 24 hours.
(5) Port Condition ZULU means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that
sustained tropical storm force winds
from a tropical or hurricane force storm
are predicted to make landfall at the
port within 12 hours.
(c) Regulations. (1) Port Condition
WHISKEY. All vessel and port facilities
must exercise due diligence in
preparation for potential storm impacts.
Slow-moving vessels may be ordered to
depart to ensure safe avoidance of the
incoming storm upon the anticipation of
the setting of Port Condition X–RAY.
Ports and waterfront facilities shall
begin removing all debris and securing
potential flying hazards. Container
stacking plans shall be implemented.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Oct 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
Waterfront facilities that are unable to
reduce container-stacking height to no
more than four high must submit a
container stacking protocol to the COTP.
(2) Port Condition X–RAY. All vessels
and port facilities shall ensure that
potential flying debris is removed or
secured. Hazardous materials/pollution
hazards must be secured in a safe
manner and away from waterfront areas.
Facilities shall continue to implement
container-stacking protocol. Containers
must not exceed four tiers, unless
previously approved by the COTP.
Containers carrying hazardous materials
may not be stacked above the second
tier. All oceangoing commercial vessels
greater than 500-gross tons must prepare
to depart ports and anchorages within
the affected regulated area. These
vessels shall depart immediately upon
the setting of Port Condition YANKEE.
During this condition, slow-moving
vessels may be ordered to depart to
ensure safe avoidance of the incoming
storm. Vessels that are unable to depart
the port must contact the COTP to
request and receive permission to
remain in port. Vessels with COTP’s
permission to remain in port must
implement their pre-approved mooring
arrangement. Terminal operators shall
prepare to terminate all cargo
operations. The COTP may require
additional precautions to ensure the
safety of the ports and waterways.
(3) Port Condition YANKEE. Affected
ports would be closed to inbound vessel
traffic. All oceangoing commercial
vessels greater than 500-gross tons must
have departed designated ports within
the Sector Miami COTP zone.
Appropriate container stacking protocol
must be completed. Terminal operators
must terminate all cargo operations not
associated with storm preparations.
Cargo operations associated with storm
preparations include moving cargo
within or off the port for securing
purposes, crane and other port/facility
equipment preparations, and similar
activities, but do not include moving
cargo onto the port or vessel loading/
discharging operations unless
specifically authorized by the COTP. All
facilities shall continue to operate in
accordance with approved Facility
Security Plans and comply with the
requirements of the Maritime
Transportation Security Act (MTSA).
(4) Port Condition ZULU. All port
waterfront operations are suspended,
except final preparations that are
expressly permitted by the COTP as
necessary to ensure the safety of the
ports and facilities. Coast Guard Port
Assessment Teams will conduct final
port assessments.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(5) Emergency Restrictions for Other
Disasters. Any natural or other disasters
that are anticipated to affect the Sector
Miami COTP zone will result in the
prohibition of facility operations and
commercial vessel traffic transiting or
remaining in the affected port.
Dated: September 23, 2019.
J.F. Burdian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Miami.
[FR Doc. 2019–21510 Filed 10–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0541; FRL–10000–
65–Region 9]
Clean Air Plans; 2008 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area Requirements;
Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing action on a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Arizona on
behalf of the Maricopa Association of
Governments (MAG) to meet Clean Air
Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’) requirements for
the 2008 ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS or
‘‘standards’’) in the Phoenix-Mesa
(‘‘Phoenix’’) ozone nonattainment area.
The EPA is proposing to approve the
portions of the ‘‘MAG 2017 8-Hour
Ozone Moderate Area Plan’’ (‘‘MAG
2017 Ozone Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’) that
address the requirements for emissions
inventories, a demonstration of
attainment by the applicable attainment
date, reasonably available control
measures, reasonable further progress
(RFP), motor vehicle emission budgets
for transportation conformity, vehicle
inspection and maintenance programs,
new source review rules, and offsets.
The EPA is proposing to disapprove the
portion of the MAG 2017 Ozone Plan
that addresses the requirements for
contingency measures for failure to
attain or to make RFP. However, based
on a separate proposed action finding
that the Phoenix nonattainment area
attained the 2008 ozone standard by the
applicable attainment date, we are also
proposing to determine that the
requirement for contingency measures
will no longer apply to the Phoenix
nonattainment area. Finally, we are
proposing to approve the portions of a
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52835-52838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21510]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-1067]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Hurricanes, Tropical Storms and Other Disasters in
South Florida
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 5, 2017, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish a
[[Page 52836]]
temporary safety zone over certain navigable waters within the Sector
Miami Captain of the Port (COTP) zone. This safety zone would allow the
Coast Guard to restrict certain vessels from entering or transiting
through certain navigable waters in the Miami River and Ports of Miami,
Everglades, Palm Beach and Fort Pierce during periods of reduced or
restricted visibility due to tropical storm force winds (39-73 mph/34-
63 knots), hurricanes and/or other disasters. The Coast Guard proposes
to publish this supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
since considerable time has passed from the time when the initial NPRM
was published, and because minor modifications have been made to the
proposed rule. This SNPRM requests comments on the revised proposal.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before November 4, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-1067 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking contact Mr. Omar Beceiro, Sector Miami Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard at (305) 535-4317, or by email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
A. Regulatory History and Information
The purpose of the proposed regulation is to ensure the safety of
life on navigable waters of the United States by restricting movement
of certain vessels in the event of severe weather conditions or
disasters, including tropical storms and hurricanes. The COTP has
determined reduced or restricted visibility and tropical storm force
winds, which may occur during tropical storms, hurricanes and other
disasters, constitute a safety concern for anyone within the proposed
safety zone.
B. Discussion of Comments on NPRM and Changes to the Proposed Rule
On May 10, 2017, the Coast Guard published a NPRM titled ``Safety
Zone; Hurricanes and Other Disasters in South Florida'' (see 82 FR
21742). The purpose of the proposed regulation was to ensure the safety
of life on navigable waters of the United States within the Sector
Miami COTP zone by restricting movement of certain vessels in the event
of severe weather conditions or disasters, including tropical storms
and hurricanes. During the comment period, the Coast Guard received two
comments, both in favor of the proposed regulations. One comment;
however, also expressed several concerns. The commenter expressed a
concern that the proposed rule did not clearly indicate that the COTP
has the discretion to implement only those measures necessary given the
specific circumstances of the emergency, rather than all measures being
required. In addition, the commenter indicated the proposed rule should
clearly state the application of restrictive measures would be applied
only to those areas within the Sector Miami COTP zone affected by the
hazardous condition. The commenter indicated that the proposed rule
should not restrict operations in other areas of the COTP zones which
are minimally or not at all affected. Finally, the commenter suggested
that language in the section heading and text be modified to clearly
indicate the regulation would be applicable when tropical storm-force
winds are expected. To address these concerns, the Coast Guard made
changes to the title and text of the proposed rule to include the use
of ``tropical storm'' when referencing severe weather and clarified the
COTP may restrict vessel movement only in ports affected by impending
tropical storm force winds.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a temporary safety zone on
certain navigable waters within the Sector Miami COTP zone in response
to disasters and/or specified severe weather conditions (e.g. tropical
storms and hurricanes) that would restrict movement of certain vessels
when the COTP sets specific Port Conditions. The movement of certain
vessel traffic within navigable waters of the Miami River and Ports of
Miami, Everglades, Palm Beach and Fort Pierce would be affected by this
rule. Vessel movement restrictions would only apply to those ports
within the Sector Miami COTP zone forecast to experience tropical storm
force winds within a specific timeframe. The proposed rule would give
the COTP flexibility in controlling and reconstituting vessel traffic
during periods of heavy weather and expedite resumption of the Marine
Transportation System following disasters and severe weather.
Port Conditions (WHISKEY, X-RAY, YANKEE, and ZULU) are standardized
states of operation instituted by the COTP and shared with all major
ports, facilities, and members of the Marine Transportation System. The
intermodal and dynamic nature of the Marine Transportation System
requires all parties to comply with safety and security procedures when
faced with the challenges of tropical storms, hurricanes and other
disasters.
Notice of Port Conditions and their requirements will be given via
Marine Safety Information Bulletins, online at https://
https://homeport.uscg.mil/miami">homeport.uscg.mil/miami, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and Severe
Weather Advisory Team meetings.
The revised regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of
this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This SNPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the SNPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Port facilities
and vessel traffic will be affected by this rule only during limited
times when heavy weather is expected to make imminent landfall within
the Sector Miami COTP zone. In addition, vessel traffic would be
secured only during port conditions Yankee and Zulu, and only in ports
potentially
[[Page 52837]]
affected by tropical storm force winds. The Coast Guard would issue
updates on https://homeport.uscg.mil/miami">homeport.uscg.mil/miami, via broadcasts on VHF-FM marine
channel 16, and during Severe Weather Advisory Team meetings.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone of limited duration implemented during tropical
storms, hurricanes or other heavy weather events. Normally such actions
are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a)
in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures 5090.1. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration
is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments received during the comment period. Your
comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a
comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate
the specific section of this document to which each comment applies,
and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this SNPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[[Page 52838]]
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS.
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 165.785 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.785 Safety Zone; Hurricanes, Tropical Storms and Other
Disasters in South Florida.
(a) Regulated Areas. All navigable waters, as defined in 33 CFR
2.36, within Sector Miami COTP zone, Miami, Florida, as described in 33
CFR 3.35-10, during specified conditions.
(b) Definitions. (1) The term ``designated representative'' means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the COTP
Miami, in the enforcement of the regulated areas.
(2) Port Condition WHISKEY means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained tropical storm force winds from a
tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make landfall at the
port within 72 hours.
(3) Port Condition X-RAY means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained tropical storm force winds from a
tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make landfall at the
port within 48 hours.
(4) Port Condition YANKEE means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that sustained tropical storm force winds
from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make landfall
at the port within 24 hours.
(5) Port Condition ZULU means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that sustained tropical storm force winds
from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make landfall
at the port within 12 hours.
(c) Regulations. (1) Port Condition WHISKEY. All vessel and port
facilities must exercise due diligence in preparation for potential
storm impacts. Slow-moving vessels may be ordered to depart to ensure
safe avoidance of the incoming storm upon the anticipation of the
setting of Port Condition X-RAY. Ports and waterfront facilities shall
begin removing all debris and securing potential flying hazards.
Container stacking plans shall be implemented. Waterfront facilities
that are unable to reduce container-stacking height to no more than
four high must submit a container stacking protocol to the COTP.
(2) Port Condition X-RAY. All vessels and port facilities shall
ensure that potential flying debris is removed or secured. Hazardous
materials/pollution hazards must be secured in a safe manner and away
from waterfront areas. Facilities shall continue to implement
container-stacking protocol. Containers must not exceed four tiers,
unless previously approved by the COTP. Containers carrying hazardous
materials may not be stacked above the second tier. All oceangoing
commercial vessels greater than 500-gross tons must prepare to depart
ports and anchorages within the affected regulated area. These vessels
shall depart immediately upon the setting of Port Condition YANKEE.
During this condition, slow-moving vessels may be ordered to depart to
ensure safe avoidance of the incoming storm. Vessels that are unable to
depart the port must contact the COTP to request and receive permission
to remain in port. Vessels with COTP's permission to remain in port
must implement their pre-approved mooring arrangement. Terminal
operators shall prepare to terminate all cargo operations. The COTP may
require additional precautions to ensure the safety of the ports and
waterways.
(3) Port Condition YANKEE. Affected ports would be closed to
inbound vessel traffic. All oceangoing commercial vessels greater than
500-gross tons must have departed designated ports within the Sector
Miami COTP zone. Appropriate container stacking protocol must be
completed. Terminal operators must terminate all cargo operations not
associated with storm preparations. Cargo operations associated with
storm preparations include moving cargo within or off the port for
securing purposes, crane and other port/facility equipment
preparations, and similar activities, but do not include moving cargo
onto the port or vessel loading/discharging operations unless
specifically authorized by the COTP. All facilities shall continue to
operate in accordance with approved Facility Security Plans and comply
with the requirements of the Maritime Transportation Security Act
(MTSA).
(4) Port Condition ZULU. All port waterfront operations are
suspended, except final preparations that are expressly permitted by
the COTP as necessary to ensure the safety of the ports and facilities.
Coast Guard Port Assessment Teams will conduct final port assessments.
(5) Emergency Restrictions for Other Disasters. Any natural or
other disasters that are anticipated to affect the Sector Miami COTP
zone will result in the prohibition of facility operations and
commercial vessel traffic transiting or remaining in the affected port.
Dated: September 23, 2019.
J.F. Burdian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Miami.
[FR Doc. 2019-21510 Filed 10-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P