Program Fraud Civil Remedies: Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment, 51937-51938 [2019-21132]
Download as PDF
51937
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 190
Tuesday, October 1, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 185
RIN 3206–AN39
Program Fraud Civil Remedies: Civil
Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule adjusts the level of
civil monetary penalties contained in
U.S. Office of Personnel Management
regulations implementing the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986.
DATES: Effective: October 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R.
Alan Miller, Office of the General
Counsel, Office of Personnel
Management, 1900 E St. NW,
Washington, DC 20415, RAlan.Miller@
opm.gov, (202) 606–1700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 2, 2015, the President
signed into law the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Office of Personnel
Management (OPM).
AGENCY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
ACTION:
Improvements Act of 2015 (Sec. 701 of
Pub. L. 114–74)(‘‘the Act’’). The Act
required agencies to: (1) Adjust the level
of civil monetary penalties with an
initial ‘‘catch-up’’ adjustment through
an interim final rulemaking, and (2)
make subsequent annual adjustments
for inflation. The purpose of these
adjustments is to maintain the deterrent
effect of civil penalties.
OPM has updated the agency’s
monetary penalties annually since the
passage of the 2015 Act.
This rule takes into account
adjustments for the year 2018 based on
inflation for that year. These
calculations were made based on
guidance contained in Office of
Management and Budget Memorandum
M–17–11:
Current
penalty
CFR citation
Description of the penalty
5 CFR 185.103(a) .......................................
5 CFR 185.103(f)(2) ....................................
Civil Penalty for False Claims .......................................................
Civil Penalty for False Statements ................................................
This rule makes additional
adjustments for the year 2018 based on
inflation for that year. These
calculations were made based on
guidance contained in Office of
Management and Budget Memorandum
M–19–04.
This final rule is being issued without
prior public notice or opportunity for
public comments. The 2015 Act’s
amendments to the Inflation Adjustment
Act required the agency to adjust
penalties initially through an interim
final rulemaking, which did not require
the agency to complete a notice and
comment process prior to promulgating
the interim final rule. The amendments
also explicitly required the agency to
make subsequent annual adjustments
notwithstanding 5 U.S.C. 553 (the
section of the Administrative Procedure
Act that normally requires agencies to
engage in notice and comment). The
formula used for adjusting the amount
of civil penalties is given by statute,
with no discretion provided to OPM
regarding the computation of the
adjustments. OPM is charged only with
performing ministerial computations to
determine the amount of adjustment to
the civil penalties due to increases in
the Consumer Price Index for all Urban
Consumers (CPI–U).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Sep 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
II. Calculation of Adjustment
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) issues guidance annually on
calculating adjustments. Under this
guidance, OPM has identified
applicable civil monetary penalties and
calculated the catch-up adjustment. A
civil monetary penalty is any
assessment with a dollar amount that is
levied for a violation of a Federal civil
statute or regulation, and is assessed or
enforceable through a civil action in
Federal court or an administrative
proceeding. A civil monetary penalty
does not include a penalty levied for
violation of a criminal statute, or fees for
services, licenses, permits, or other
regulatory review. The calculated catchup adjustment is based on the percent
change between the Consumer Price
Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI–U)
for the month of October in the year of
the previous adjustment (or in the year
of establishment, if no adjustment has
been made) and the October 2015
CPI–U.
The Office of Management and Budget
published guidance on adjusting
penalties based on the increase in the
CPI–U between October of 2017 and
October of 2018. See December 14,
2018, Memorandum for the Heads of
Executive Departments and Agencies,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2018 inflation
adjustment
$11,181
11,181
$11,463
11,463
from Mick Mulvaney, Director, Office of
Management and Budget, re:
Implementation of Penalty Inflation
Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015. This guidance provided OPM
with the level to which civil penalties
should be adjusted as annual inflation
adjustments following the initial
necessary update to comply with the
2015 Act.
Office of Management and Budget
Memorandum M–19–04 stated that the
cost of living multiplier for calculating
adjustments in 2018 was 1.02522. This
multiplier is to be applied to the current
level of civil monetary penalties for
agencies. When OPM’s current penalties
of $11,181 are multiplied by 1.02522,
the resulting penalty amount is $11,463.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Impact Analysis:
Executive Order 12866, as
Supplemented by Executive Order
13563
OPM has examined the impact of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 and Executive Order 13563,
which directs agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
51938
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public, health, and
safety effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). A regulatory impact analysis
must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects of $100
million or more in any one year. This
rule is not ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
B. Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires an agency to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for rules
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The RFA applies only to rules
for which an agency is required to first
publish a proposed rule. See 5 U.S.C.
603(a) and 604(a). The Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 requires
agencies to adjust civil penalties
annually. No discretion is allowed.
Thus, the RFA does not apply to this
final rule.
D. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2))
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
This rule does not involve a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Jkt 250001
This rule does not have federalism
implications. The rule does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
This rule complies with the
requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Does not unduly burden the
judicial system.
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
I. E.O. 13175, Consultation With Indian
Tribes
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, OPM has evaluated this rule and
determined that it has no tribal
implications.
This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 185
Program Fraud Civil Remedies,
Claims, Penalties, Basis for Civil
Penalties and Assessments.
Office of Personnel Management.
Stephen Hickman,
Regulatory Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 185 of title 5 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 185—PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL
REMEDIES: CIVIL MONETARY
PENALTY INFLATION ADJUSTMENT
E. Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532)
1. The authority citation for part 185
continues to read:
■
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
§ 185.103
[Amended]
2. Section 185.103 is amended in
paragraphs (a) introductory text and
■
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(f)(2) by revising ‘‘$11,181’’ to read as
‘‘$11,463’’.
[FR Doc. 2019–21132 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–48–P
G. E.O. 13132, Federalism
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule is not a major rule under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises.
16:58 Sep 30, 2019
This rule does not have takings
implications.
H. E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because it is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
F. E.O. 12630, Takings
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary of Agriculture
7 CFR Part 1
Rules of Practice and Procedure
Governing Formal Rulemaking
Proceedings Instituted by the
Secretary
Office of the Secretary of
Agriculture, USDA.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA or Department) is
amending the regulations on the rules of
practice and procedure governing
formal rulemaking proceedings
instituted by the Secretary. This final
rule amends the definition of judge so
that the term is consistently applied to
all USDA formal rulemaking
proceedings.
This final rule is effective
October 1, 2019.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rupa Chilukuri, Trial Attorney, Office
of the General Counsel, telephone: 202–
720–4982, email: Rupa.Chilukuri@
usda.gov.
USDA is
issuing this final rule to amend the
definition of judge in the rules of
practice and procedure governing
formal rulemaking proceedings
instituted by the Secretary. The current
definition of judge in the rules of
practice at 7 CFR 1.802 only includes
administrative law judges. To provide
the agency with more flexibility in
overseeing formal rulemaking
proceedings, and to better allocate
resources within the Department, we are
expanding the definition of judge to be
consistent with how that term is defined
in the Department’s other rules of
practice and procedure applicable to
formal rulemaking proceedings (i.e., 7
CFR part 900 (General Regulations) and
7 CFR part 1200 (Rules of Practice and
Procedure Governing Proceedings
Under Research, Promotion, and
Information Programs)). Judge will now
be defined as any administrative law
judge appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
3105 or any presiding official appointed
by the Secretary, and assigned to
conduct the proceeding.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51937-51938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21132]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 51937]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 185
RIN 3206-AN39
Program Fraud Civil Remedies: Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adjusts the level of civil monetary penalties
contained in U.S. Office of Personnel Management regulations
implementing the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986.
DATES: Effective: October 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Alan Miller, Office of the General
Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E St. NW, Washington, DC
20415, [email protected], (202) 606-1700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 2, 2015, the President signed into law the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Sec.
701 of Pub. L. 114-74)(``the Act''). The Act required agencies to: (1)
Adjust the level of civil monetary penalties with an initial ``catch-
up'' adjustment through an interim final rulemaking, and (2) make
subsequent annual adjustments for inflation. The purpose of these
adjustments is to maintain the deterrent effect of civil penalties.
OPM has updated the agency's monetary penalties annually since the
passage of the 2015 Act.
This rule takes into account adjustments for the year 2018 based on
inflation for that year. These calculations were made based on guidance
contained in Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M-17-11:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current 2018 inflation
CFR citation Description of the penalty penalty adjustment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 CFR 185.103(a).............................. Civil Penalty for False Claims.. $11,181 $11,463
5 CFR 185.103(f)(2)........................... Civil Penalty for False 11,181 11,463
Statements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule makes additional adjustments for the year 2018 based on
inflation for that year. These calculations were made based on guidance
contained in Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M-19-04.
This final rule is being issued without prior public notice or
opportunity for public comments. The 2015 Act's amendments to the
Inflation Adjustment Act required the agency to adjust penalties
initially through an interim final rulemaking, which did not require
the agency to complete a notice and comment process prior to
promulgating the interim final rule. The amendments also explicitly
required the agency to make subsequent annual adjustments
notwithstanding 5 U.S.C. 553 (the section of the Administrative
Procedure Act that normally requires agencies to engage in notice and
comment). The formula used for adjusting the amount of civil penalties
is given by statute, with no discretion provided to OPM regarding the
computation of the adjustments. OPM is charged only with performing
ministerial computations to determine the amount of adjustment to the
civil penalties due to increases in the Consumer Price Index for all
Urban Consumers (CPI-U).
II. Calculation of Adjustment
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issues guidance annually
on calculating adjustments. Under this guidance, OPM has identified
applicable civil monetary penalties and calculated the catch-up
adjustment. A civil monetary penalty is any assessment with a dollar
amount that is levied for a violation of a Federal civil statute or
regulation, and is assessed or enforceable through a civil action in
Federal court or an administrative proceeding. A civil monetary penalty
does not include a penalty levied for violation of a criminal statute,
or fees for services, licenses, permits, or other regulatory review.
The calculated catch-up adjustment is based on the percent change
between the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for
the month of October in the year of the previous adjustment (or in the
year of establishment, if no adjustment has been made) and the October
2015 CPI-U.
The Office of Management and Budget published guidance on adjusting
penalties based on the increase in the CPI-U between October of 2017
and October of 2018. See December 14, 2018, Memorandum for the Heads of
Executive Departments and Agencies, from Mick Mulvaney, Director,
Office of Management and Budget, re: Implementation of Penalty
Inflation Adjustments for 2019, Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. This guidance
provided OPM with the level to which civil penalties should be adjusted
as annual inflation adjustments following the initial necessary update
to comply with the 2015 Act.
Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M-19-04 stated that the
cost of living multiplier for calculating adjustments in 2018 was
1.02522. This multiplier is to be applied to the current level of civil
monetary penalties for agencies. When OPM's current penalties of
$11,181 are multiplied by 1.02522, the resulting penalty amount is
$11,463.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Executive Order 12866, as Supplemented
by Executive Order 13563
OPM has examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563, which directs agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is
[[Page 51938]]
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public, health, and
safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis must be prepared for major rules with economically significant
effects of $100 million or more in any one year. This rule is not
``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
B. Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
This rule is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because it is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis for rules unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The RFA applies only to rules for
which an agency is required to first publish a proposed rule. See 5
U.S.C. 603(a) and 604(a). The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 requires agencies to adjust
civil penalties annually. No discretion is allowed. Thus, the RFA does
not apply to this final rule.
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2))
This rule is not a major rule under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
E. Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532)
This rule does not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such
rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
F. E.O. 12630, Takings
This rule does not have takings implications.
G. E.O. 13132, Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications. The rule does not
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
H. E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Does not unduly burden the judicial system.
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
I. E.O. 13175, Consultation With Indian Tribes
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, OPM has evaluated this
rule and determined that it has no tribal implications.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
104-13.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 185
Program Fraud Civil Remedies, Claims, Penalties, Basis for Civil
Penalties and Assessments.
Office of Personnel Management.
Stephen Hickman,
Regulatory Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 185 of title 5 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 185--PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES: CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY
INFLATION ADJUSTMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 185 continues to read:
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
Sec. 185.103 [Amended]
0
2. Section 185.103 is amended in paragraphs (a) introductory text and
(f)(2) by revising ``$11,181'' to read as ``$11,463''.
[FR Doc. 2019-21132 Filed 9-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-48-P