Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Second Maintenance Plan for 1997 Ozone NAAQS; Dayton-Springfield, 52001-52003 [2019-20850]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Name of source
*
Bruce Mansfield Generating Station.
Jewel Acquisition, LLC,
Midland Facility.
*
*
*
(e) * * *
*
Permit No.
County
*
FirstEnergy Redacted
Consent Order and
Agreement.
Jewel Acquisition Redacted Consent Order
and Agreement.
*
Beaver ...............
Beaver ...............
*
EPA approval date
Additional explanation/§ 52.2063 citation
*
10/1/18
*
10/1/19, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
9/21/17
10/1/19, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
Sulfur dioxide emission limits and related parameters in unredacted portions of the Consent
Order and Agreement dated 9/21/17.
Operational restrictions and related parameters in
unredacted portions of the Consent Order and
Agreement.
(1) * * *
State
submittal
date
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
Applicable geographic area
*
*
Attainment Plan for the Beaver, Pennsylvania Nonattainment Area for the 2010
Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient
Air Quality Standard.
*
*
Industry Borough, Shippingport Borough,
Midland Borough, Brighton Township,
Potter Township and Vanport Township.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 52.2033 is amended by
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2033
Control strategy: Sulfur oxides.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) EPA approves the attainment
demonstration State Implementation
Plan for the Beaver, PA Nonattainment
Area submitted by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection
on September 29, 2017.
[FR Doc. 2019–20848 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2019–0216; FRL–10000–
38-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Second
Maintenance Plan for 1997 Ozone
NAAQS; Dayton-Springfield
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
State
effective
date
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving, under the
Clean Air Act (CAA), Ohio’s plan for
maintaining the 1997 ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS
or standard) through 2028 in the
Dayton-Springfield area. The DaytonSpringfield area consists of Clark,
Greene, Miami and Montgomery
Counties. The Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency submitted this state
implementation plan (SIP) revision to
EPA on April 12, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Sep 30, 2019
52001
Jkt 250001
*
9/29/17
EPA approval date
*
*
10/1/19, [Insert Federal Register citation]
This final rule is effective
October 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2019–0216. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen D’Agostino, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–1767,
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
DATES:
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
This rule approves Ohio’s April 23,
2019 submission of a plan to provide for
maintenance of the 1997 ozone standard
in the Dayton-Springfield area through
2028. The Dayton-Springfield area was
designated as nonattainment for the
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Additional
explanation
52.2033(d)
1997 ozone NAAQS on April 15, 2004
(69 FR 23857) and subsequently
redesignated to attainment on August
13, 2007 (72 FR 45169). As a
prerequisite to redesignation, Ohio
developed a maintenance plan for the
Dayton-Springfield area as required by
CAA section 175A. The maintenance
plan demonstrated that the area would
continue to maintain the 1997 ozone
standard through 2018 (more than 10
years after redesignation) and contained
contingency provisions to assure that
violations of the standard would be
promptly corrected.
Under CAA section 175A(b), states
must submit a revision to the first
maintenance plan eight years after
redesignation to provide for
maintenance of the NAAQS for ten
additional years following the end of the
first 10-year period. On April 12, 2019,
Ohio submitted a second maintenance
plan for the Dayton-Springfield area
demonstrating continued maintenance
of the 1997 ozone NAAQS through
2028, i.e., through the end of the full 20year maintenance period.
On July 9, 2019 (84 FR 32678), EPA
proposed to approve Ohio’s April 12,
2019 submittal. The specific details of
Ohio’s second 1997 ozone NAAQS
maintenance plan for the DaytonSpringfield area and the rationale for
EPA’s approval are discussed in the
notice of proposed rulemaking and will
not be restated here.
II. What comments did we receive on
the proposed rule?
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period for the July 9, 2019,
proposed rule. The comment period
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
52002
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
ended on August 8, 2019. We received
no comments on the proposed rule.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving, as a revision to the
Ohio SIP, the State’s plan for
maintaining the 1997 ozone NAAQS
through 2028 in the Dayton-Springfield
area.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by December 2, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 11, 2019.
Cheryl L Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.1870, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended under the subheading
‘‘Summary of Criteria Pollutant
Maintenance Plan’’ by revising the entry
for ‘‘Ozone 8-Hour’’ for DaytonSpringfield (Miami, Montgomery, Clark,
and Greene Counties) with a State date
of 11/6/2006 to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1870
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED OHIO NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable geographical
or non-attainment area
Title
*
*
*
State date
*
EPA approval
*
*
Comments
*
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan
*
*
*
*
Ozone (8-Hour, 1997) ............................ Dayton-Springfield
(Miami,
Montgomery, Clark, and Greene Counties).
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Sep 30, 2019
*
Jkt 250001
*
PO 00000
Frm 00066
4/12/2019
*
Fmt 4700
*
*
10/1/2019, [insert Federal Register citation].
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
*
01OCR1
*
2nd maintenance plan.
*
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Mr. Akers can be reached via electronic
mail at akers.brad@epa.gov or via
telephone at (404) 562–9089.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2019–20850 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0278; FRL–10000–
49–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; KY; Existing
Indirect Heat Exchangers for Jefferson
County
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or Agency) is approving
changes to the Jefferson County portion
of the Kentucky State Implementation
Plan (SIP), submitted by the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, through
the Energy and Environment Cabinet
(Cabinet), through a letter dated March
15, 2018. The changes were submitted
by the Cabinet on behalf of the
Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control
District (District, also referred to herein
as Jefferson County). The SIP revision
includes changes to Jefferson County
Regulations regarding existing indirect
heat exchangers.
DATES: This rule will be effective
October 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2019–0278. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air and Radiation Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Sep 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
I. Background
EPA is approving changes to the
Jefferson County portion of the
Kentucky SIP that were provided to EPA
through Kentucky’s Division of Air
Quality via a letter dated March 15,
2018.1 2 EPA is approving the portions
of this SIP revision that make changes
to the District’s Regulation 6.07,
Standards of Performance for Existing
Indirect Heat Exchangers.3 The March
15, 2018, SIP revision makes minor and
ministerial changes to Regulation 6.07
that do not alter the meaning of the
regulation or the emissions levels for
sources regulated under the Jefferson
County Regulations, such as clarifying
changes to its applicability. In addition,
other changes in the submittal
strengthen the SIP by adding specific
test methods and procedures for
determining compliance with applicable
emissions limits for affected facilities.
Accordingly, these rule changes do not
relax the emissions reductions to
applicable sources, nor do they change
any applicable emissions limitations.
The SIP revision updates the current
SIP-approved version of Regulation 6.07
(version 3) to version 4.
See EPA’s July 22, 2019 (84 FR
35052), notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) for further detail on these
changes and EPA’s rationale for
approving them. EPA received adverse
comments on the NPRM. EPA received
one additional comment, available in
1 EPA received the SIP revision on March 23,
2018.
2 In 2003, the City of Louisville and Jefferson
County governments merged and the ‘‘Jefferson
County Air Pollution Control District’’ was renamed
the ‘‘Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control
District.’’ See The History of Air Pollution Control
in Louisville, available at https://louisvilleky.gov/
government/air-pollution-control-district/historyair-pollution-control-louisville. However, each of
the regulations in the Jefferson County portion of
the Kentucky SIP still has the subheading ‘‘Air
Pollution Control District of Jefferson County.’’
Thus, to be consistent with the terminology used in
the SIP, we refer throughout this notice to
regulations contained in the Jefferson County
portion of the Kentucky SIP as the ‘‘Jefferson
County’’ regulations.
3 EPA received several submittals revising the
Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP
transmitted with the same March 15, 2018, cover
letter. EPA will consider action on these other SIP
revisions in separate rulemakings.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52003
the docket for this action, which is not
relevant to this rulemaking. EPA has
summarized and responded to the
adverse comments in Section II of this
action.
II. Response to Comments
Comment: One commenter states that
EPA should disapprove Regulation 6.07
because ‘‘it is inconsistent with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and it violates the Kentucky
Clean Air Act.’’
Response: EPA disagrees with this
comment. The Agency is taking action
pursuant to the Federal CAA, and
actions under the CAA are exempt from
NEPA. See 15 U.S.C. 793(c)(1). To the
extent the commenter intended to
reference Kentucky’s Air Pollution
Control District Act (codified at
Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS),
Chapter 77, Air Pollution Control) in its
comment regarding the ‘‘Kentucky
Clean Air Act,’’ EPA notes that the
District approved the revisions under
KRS Chapter 77, stating in the SIP
submittal that KRS 77.180 provides for
the control of emissions from indirect
heat exchangers.4 Further, EPA notes
that the commenter does not provide
any rationale or information supporting
its assertions.
Comment: One commenter states that
the rule poses significant risks to public
health and the environment and that it
will negatively impact Kentucky’s
electricity market and increase energy
prices in Kentucky. Similarly, another
commenter suggests that EPA should
‘‘revisit’’ the rule because it does not
properly address the community’s needs
and that the ‘‘system in place to assist
our community in reducing energy costs
is not the ‘best’ fit today and is not fit
in the future for our community.’’
Response: EPA disagrees that the SIP
revision poses a significant risk to
public health and the environment. The
changes to Regulation 6.07 do not alter
any applicable emissions limitations
and are therefore not expected to
increase emissions. Rather, the revisions
clarify and strengthen the SIP by
providing specific testing requirements
for certain sources. In addition, sources
regulated pursuant to Regulation 6.07
are not otherwise required by Federal
regulations to achieve emissions
reductions; therefore, Regulation 6.07
benefits Jefferson County by requiring
specific emissions reductions for
particulate matter (PM) and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) from these sources.
4 The SIP revision also states that KRS 77.180
authorizes the District to adopt and enforce all
orders, rules, and regulations necessary or proper to
accomplish the purposes of KRS Chapter 77.
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52001-52003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20850]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2019-0216; FRL-10000-38-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Second Maintenance Plan for 1997 Ozone
NAAQS; Dayton-Springfield
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving, under
the Clean Air Act (CAA), Ohio's plan for maintaining the 1997 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS or standard) through 2028
in the Dayton-Springfield area. The Dayton-Springfield area consists of
Clark, Greene, Miami and Montgomery Counties. The Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency submitted this state implementation plan (SIP)
revision to EPA on April 12, 2019.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2019-0216. All documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-1767,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
I. What is being addressed in this document?
This rule approves Ohio's April 23, 2019 submission of a plan to
provide for maintenance of the 1997 ozone standard in the Dayton-
Springfield area through 2028. The Dayton-Springfield area was
designated as nonattainment for the 1997 ozone NAAQS on April 15, 2004
(69 FR 23857) and subsequently redesignated to attainment on August 13,
2007 (72 FR 45169). As a prerequisite to redesignation, Ohio developed
a maintenance plan for the Dayton-Springfield area as required by CAA
section 175A. The maintenance plan demonstrated that the area would
continue to maintain the 1997 ozone standard through 2018 (more than 10
years after redesignation) and contained contingency provisions to
assure that violations of the standard would be promptly corrected.
Under CAA section 175A(b), states must submit a revision to the
first maintenance plan eight years after redesignation to provide for
maintenance of the NAAQS for ten additional years following the end of
the first 10-year period. On April 12, 2019, Ohio submitted a second
maintenance plan for the Dayton-Springfield area demonstrating
continued maintenance of the 1997 ozone NAAQS through 2028, i.e.,
through the end of the full 20-year maintenance period.
On July 9, 2019 (84 FR 32678), EPA proposed to approve Ohio's April
12, 2019 submittal. The specific details of Ohio's second 1997 ozone
NAAQS maintenance plan for the Dayton-Springfield area and the
rationale for EPA's approval are discussed in the notice of proposed
rulemaking and will not be restated here.
II. What comments did we receive on the proposed rule?
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for the July 9,
2019, proposed rule. The comment period
[[Page 52002]]
ended on August 8, 2019. We received no comments on the proposed rule.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving, as a revision to the Ohio SIP, the State's plan
for maintaining the 1997 ozone NAAQS through 2028 in the Dayton-
Springfield area.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 2, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 11, 2019.
Cheryl L Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.1870, the table in paragraph (e) is amended under the
subheading ``Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan'' by
revising the entry for ``Ozone 8-Hour'' for Dayton-Springfield (Miami,
Montgomery, Clark, and Greene Counties) with a State date of 11/6/2006
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1870 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Ohio Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
geographical or
Title non-attainment State date EPA approval Comments
area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Ozone (8-Hour, 1997).......... Dayton- 4/12/2019 10/1/2019, 2nd maintenance plan.
Springfield [insert Federal
(Miami, Register
Montgomery, citation].
Clark, and
Greene Counties).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 52003]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-20850 Filed 9-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P