Special Local Regulation; Battle of the Bridges, Intracoastal Waterway; Venice, FL, 51028-51030 [2019-20806]
Download as PDF
51028
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
any direct compliance requirements on
Indian Tribal governments. Therefore, a
Tribal summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
We have analyzed this action under
E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
The FHWA has determined that this is
not a significant energy action under
that order since it is not a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in the spring and
fall of each year. The RIN number
contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross-reference
this action with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects
23 CFR Part 630
Grant programs, transportation,
highways and roads.
23 CFR Part 635
Construction materials, Design-build,
Grant programs, transportation,
highways and roads.
Issued on September 23, 2019.
Nicole R. Nason,
Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
In consideration of the foregoing,
FHWA amends 23 CFR part 635 as
follows:
PART 635—CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE
[FR Doc. 2019–20933 Filed 9–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0508]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Battle of the
Bridges, Intracoastal Waterway;
Venice, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary special local
regulation for certain waters of the
Intracoastal Waterway. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on these navigable waters in Venice, FL,
during the Battle of the Bridges event.
This rulemaking would prohibit persons
and vessels from being in the race area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg (COTP) or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30
a.m. until 4 p.m. on September 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0508 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Marine Science Technician First
Class Michael Shackleford, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 813–228–2191, email
Michael.D.Shackleford@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 635
continues to read as follows:
I. Table of Abbreviations
Authority: Sections 1525 and 1303 of Pub.
L. 112–141, Sec. 1503 of Pub. L. 109–59, 119
Stat. 1144; 23 U.S.C. 101 (note), 109, 112,
113, 114, 116, 119, 128, and 315; 31 U.S.C.
6505; 42 U.S.C. 3334, 4601 et seq.; Sec.
1041(a), Pub. L. 102–240, 105 Stat. 1914; 23
CFR 1.32; 49 CFR 1.85(a)(1).
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
ICW Intracoastal Waterway
■
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
material types to be included in the
construction of a project on a Federalaid highway.
■
2. Revise § 635.411 to read as follows:
§ 635.411 Culvert and Storm Sewer
Material Types.
State Departments of Transportation
(State DOTs) shall have the autonomy to
determine culvert and storm sewer
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Sep 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On February 2, 2019, the Sarasota
Scullers Youth Rowing Program notified
the Coast Guard that it would be
conducting the Battle of the Bridges
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sculler race from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on
September 28, 2019. The race will take
place on portions of the Intracoastal
Waterway (ICW) in Venice, FL. In
response, on August 2, 2019, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled, ‘‘Special
Local Regulation; Battle of the Bridges,
Intracoastal Waterway; Venice, FL’’ (84
FR 37808). There we stated why we
issued the NPRM, and invited
comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to this fireworks display.
During the comment period that ended
September 3, 2019, we received eightyfive comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for the
Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the rowing
event on September 28, 2019 will be a
safety concern for anyone within the
special local regulation area. The
purpose of this rule is to ensure safety
of vessels and the navigable waters in
the safety zone before, during, and after
the scheduled event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with the rowing event.
IV. Discussion of Comments and
Changes to the Rule
A. Discussion of Comments
The Coast Guard received eighty-five
submissions from private citizens in
response to the proposed rule. Forty-two
commenters endorsed the Coast Guard’s
proposal. Forty-three commenters were
opposed to the proposed rule for various
reasons, discussed below.
Twenty-two comments expressed
concerns about the monetary loss of
several businesses and their employees
that fall within the boundaries of this
temporary special local regulation. The
commenters stated businesses would
lose customers due to the 12 hours the
ICW would be closed as proposed in the
regulatory text.
Twenty comments expressed
concerns about not having access to the
ICW during this event. The commenters
stated that the ICW, and the public boat
ramps along the ICW, would be closed
for the duration of the event and the
proposed regulatory text would not
E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM
27SER1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
allow for any other boating traffic in the
ICW while the event was underway.
Seven comments expressed concerns
about not being able to access the
Marine Max Marina located along the
ICW during this event. The commenters
stated that the marina would be
inaccessible while the ICW was closed
for the event.
Nine comments expressed concern
regarding the event being too long. The
commenters stated that the proposed
twelve hour closure of the ICW for the
event was too long and that event
should be shortened.
Five comments expressed concern
regarding there being no alternative
routes around the closed section of the
ICW. The commenters stated that the
regulatory text did not provide another
route for vessel traffic to take around the
event.
Twelve comments expressed concern
regarding the safety of boaters who may
choose to transit into the Gulf of Mexico
in order to get around the closed section
of the ICW. These commenters
expressed concerns about general
boating and boating safety knowledge as
well as the potential for adverse weather
affecting the gulf waters. The Coast
Guard has taken these concerns into
consideration and has determined to
only close the ICW when the event is
actively taking place. The closure times
of the ICW are being modified to
accommodate the opening of the ICW to
allow for morning, midday, and
afternoon vessel transits. This
modification, while not providing an
alternate route, does allow for times
when vessels can transit the ICW. This
modification will reduce the effective
closure time of the ICW by
approximately 4 and a half hours, which
will allow businesses an opportunity to
remain open the day of the event. These
openings will allow for vessels to transit
to and from the marina while the ICW
remains open. This modification allows
for times when vessels can transit the
ICW instead of navigating into the Gulf
of Mexico. The Venice Police
Department confirmed that there are 4
other boats ramps in the area of the
event that can be used as alternate boat
ramps during this event. In the event of
inclement weather, a Coast Guard
designated representative reserves the
right to cancel the event, which would
open the ICW up to normal vessel
traffic.
Twenty-two comments expressed
concern regarding the ICW not being a
suitable location to hold this event. The
commenters stated that there was a
nearby rowing venue that was
constructed for such rowing events.
These comments are outside of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Sep 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
scope of this rulemaking as the Coast
Guard is not involved in the process of
selecting a venue for a sponsor’s
proposed event.
Seven comments expressed concern
regarding the event taking place on a
bad day of the week. The commenters
stated that a Saturday is not a suitable
day to host an event in the ICW and that
it should have been on a weekday
instead. These comments are outside of
the scope of this rulemaking as the
Coast Guard is not involved in the
process of selecting a day to hold a
sponsor’s proposed event.
One comment was expressed
regarding the event being hazardous to
the marine environment. The
commenter expressed concerns that a
proper environmental review was not
performed and that the use of mooring
balls and lane markers for the event
would endanger manatees and sea
turtles. The National Environmental
Policy Act requires federal agencies to
consider the impacts to the human
environment for events such as these. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
was completed for this event after the
Coast Guard consulted with numerous
environmental agencies, including U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida
Department of Environmental
Protection, Army Corps of Engineers,
and the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission. This is
addressed in section V. F.
‘‘Environment’’ below.
We received seventeen comments that
were generally negative towards the
event, and while noted, they are beyond
the scope of the rulemaking process.
B. Discussion of Changes
This rule contains one minor change
in the regulatory text from the NPRM. In
response to public comments, we have
revised the regulatory text to mitigate
the commenters concerns and to
provide for a shorter closing of the ICW
and also allow for a scheduled opening
of the ICW in the midday. This change
will allow boaters to transit the ICW at
designated times, under the direction of
a designated representative, instead of
transiting into the gulf. The change will
also allow for impacted businesses to
conduct operations as well. Details of
this change can be found in the
regulatory text at the end of this
document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51029
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the special local
regulation. This regulation would
impact approximately 3.5 miles of the
Intracoastal Waterway in Venice, FL for
approximately 4 and a half hours, on
one day. The Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
regulation, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to enter the
race area. Advance notice of the
regulation will be provide the local
community with ample time to plan
around the race event accordingly.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the special
local regulation area may be small
entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM
27SER1
51030
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please call
or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Sep 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Environmental
Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation, which
temporarily limits access to the portions
of the Intracoastal Waterway in Venice,
FL to race participants for
approximately 4 and a half hours on one
day. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L(61) in
Table 3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–
1.
2. Add § 100.35T07–0508 to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
§ 100.35T07–0508 Special Local
Regulation; Battle of the Bridges,
Intracoastal Waterway; Venice, FL.
(a) Regulated area. A regulated area is
established to include a race area
located on all waters of the Intracoastal
Waterway south of a line made
connecting the following points:
27°06′15″ N, 082°26′43″ W, to position
27°06′12″ N, 082°26′43″ W, and all
waters of the Intracoastal Waterway
north of a line made connecting the
following points: 27°03′21″ N,
082°26′17″ W, to position 27°03′19″ N,
082°26′15″ W. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definitions. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
COTP St. Petersburg in the enforcement
of the regulated areas.
‘‘Participant’’ means all persons and
vessels registered with the event
sponsor as a participant in the event.
(c) Regulations. (1) All nonparticipant persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the race area unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port (COTP) St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the race area may contact
the COTP St. Petersburg by telephone at
(727) 824–7506 or via VHF–FM radio
Channel 16 to request authorization.
(3) If authorization to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
race area is granted, all persons and
vessels receiving such authorization
shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or a designated
representative.
(4) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated areas by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, or by on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from 7:30 a.m. until 11:30
a.m., and from 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. on
September 28, 2019.
Dated: September 20, 2019.
Matthew A. Thompson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Saint Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2019–20806 Filed 9–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM
27SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51028-51030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20806]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0508]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Battle of the Bridges, Intracoastal
Waterway; Venice, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation for certain waters of the Intracoastal Waterway. This action
is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable
waters in Venice, FL, during the Battle of the Bridges event. This
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the race
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg (COTP)
or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30 a.m. until 4 p.m. on September
28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0508 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Michael
Shackleford, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 813-228-2191, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
ICW Intracoastal Waterway
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On February 2, 2019, the Sarasota Scullers Youth Rowing Program
notified the Coast Guard that it would be conducting the Battle of the
Bridges sculler race from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on September 28, 2019. The
race will take place on portions of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) in
Venice, FL. In response, on August 2, 2019, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled, ``Special Local
Regulation; Battle of the Bridges, Intracoastal Waterway; Venice, FL''
(84 FR 37808). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited
comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this fireworks
display. During the comment period that ended September 3, 2019, we
received eighty-five comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for the Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with
the rowing event on September 28, 2019 will be a safety concern for
anyone within the special local regulation area. The purpose of this
rule is to ensure safety of vessels and the navigable waters in the
safety zone before, during, and after the scheduled event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the rowing
event.
IV. Discussion of Comments and Changes to the Rule
A. Discussion of Comments
The Coast Guard received eighty-five submissions from private
citizens in response to the proposed rule. Forty-two commenters
endorsed the Coast Guard's proposal. Forty-three commenters were
opposed to the proposed rule for various reasons, discussed below.
Twenty-two comments expressed concerns about the monetary loss of
several businesses and their employees that fall within the boundaries
of this temporary special local regulation. The commenters stated
businesses would lose customers due to the 12 hours the ICW would be
closed as proposed in the regulatory text.
Twenty comments expressed concerns about not having access to the
ICW during this event. The commenters stated that the ICW, and the
public boat ramps along the ICW, would be closed for the duration of
the event and the proposed regulatory text would not
[[Page 51029]]
allow for any other boating traffic in the ICW while the event was
underway.
Seven comments expressed concerns about not being able to access
the Marine Max Marina located along the ICW during this event. The
commenters stated that the marina would be inaccessible while the ICW
was closed for the event.
Nine comments expressed concern regarding the event being too long.
The commenters stated that the proposed twelve hour closure of the ICW
for the event was too long and that event should be shortened.
Five comments expressed concern regarding there being no
alternative routes around the closed section of the ICW. The commenters
stated that the regulatory text did not provide another route for
vessel traffic to take around the event.
Twelve comments expressed concern regarding the safety of boaters
who may choose to transit into the Gulf of Mexico in order to get
around the closed section of the ICW. These commenters expressed
concerns about general boating and boating safety knowledge as well as
the potential for adverse weather affecting the gulf waters. The Coast
Guard has taken these concerns into consideration and has determined to
only close the ICW when the event is actively taking place. The closure
times of the ICW are being modified to accommodate the opening of the
ICW to allow for morning, midday, and afternoon vessel transits. This
modification, while not providing an alternate route, does allow for
times when vessels can transit the ICW. This modification will reduce
the effective closure time of the ICW by approximately 4 and a half
hours, which will allow businesses an opportunity to remain open the
day of the event. These openings will allow for vessels to transit to
and from the marina while the ICW remains open. This modification
allows for times when vessels can transit the ICW instead of navigating
into the Gulf of Mexico. The Venice Police Department confirmed that
there are 4 other boats ramps in the area of the event that can be used
as alternate boat ramps during this event. In the event of inclement
weather, a Coast Guard designated representative reserves the right to
cancel the event, which would open the ICW up to normal vessel traffic.
Twenty-two comments expressed concern regarding the ICW not being a
suitable location to hold this event. The commenters stated that there
was a nearby rowing venue that was constructed for such rowing events.
These comments are outside of the scope of this rulemaking as the Coast
Guard is not involved in the process of selecting a venue for a
sponsor's proposed event.
Seven comments expressed concern regarding the event taking place
on a bad day of the week. The commenters stated that a Saturday is not
a suitable day to host an event in the ICW and that it should have been
on a weekday instead. These comments are outside of the scope of this
rulemaking as the Coast Guard is not involved in the process of
selecting a day to hold a sponsor's proposed event.
One comment was expressed regarding the event being hazardous to
the marine environment. The commenter expressed concerns that a proper
environmental review was not performed and that the use of mooring
balls and lane markers for the event would endanger manatees and sea
turtles. The National Environmental Policy Act requires federal
agencies to consider the impacts to the human environment for events
such as these. A Record of Environmental Consideration was completed
for this event after the Coast Guard consulted with numerous
environmental agencies, including U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Army Corps of
Engineers, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
This is addressed in section V. F. ``Environment'' below.
We received seventeen comments that were generally negative towards
the event, and while noted, they are beyond the scope of the rulemaking
process.
B. Discussion of Changes
This rule contains one minor change in the regulatory text from the
NPRM. In response to public comments, we have revised the regulatory
text to mitigate the commenters concerns and to provide for a shorter
closing of the ICW and also allow for a scheduled opening of the ICW in
the midday. This change will allow boaters to transit the ICW at
designated times, under the direction of a designated representative,
instead of transiting into the gulf. The change will also allow for
impacted businesses to conduct operations as well. Details of this
change can be found in the regulatory text at the end of this document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation.
This regulation would impact approximately 3.5 miles of the
Intracoastal Waterway in Venice, FL for approximately 4 and a half
hours, on one day. The Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the regulation, and the
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the race area.
Advance notice of the regulation will be provide the local community
with ample time to plan around the race event accordingly.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
special local regulation area may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule
[[Page 51030]]
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a special local regulation, which
temporarily limits access to the portions of the Intracoastal Waterway
in Venice, FL to race participants for approximately 4 and a half hours
on one day. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L(61) in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Implementing Procedures. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.35T07-0508 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35T07-0508 Special Local Regulation; Battle of the Bridges,
Intracoastal Waterway; Venice, FL.
(a) Regulated area. A regulated area is established to include a
race area located on all waters of the Intracoastal Waterway south of a
line made connecting the following points: 27[deg]06'15'' N,
082[deg]26'43'' W, to position 27[deg]06'12'' N, 082[deg]26'43'' W, and
all waters of the Intracoastal Waterway north of a line made connecting
the following points: 27[deg]03'21'' N, 082[deg]26'17'' W, to position
27[deg]03'19'' N, 082[deg]26'15'' W. All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
(b) Definitions. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the COTP
St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated areas.
``Participant'' means all persons and vessels registered with the
event sponsor as a participant in the event.
(c) Regulations. (1) All non-participant persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the race area unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the race area may contact the COTP St. Petersburg
by telephone at (727) 824-7506 or via VHF-FM radio Channel 16 to
request authorization.
(3) If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the race area is granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization shall comply with the instructions of the
COTP or a designated representative.
(4) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated areas by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 7:30 a.m.
until 11:30 a.m., and from 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. on September 28, 2019.
Dated: September 20, 2019.
Matthew A. Thompson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Saint Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2019-20806 Filed 9-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P