Auction of Toll Free Numbers in the 833 Code; Notice and Filing Requirements, Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for the 833 Auction; Bidding Scheduled To Occur on December 17, 2019, 50767-50785 [2019-20526]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
C. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
This final authorization revises Ohio’s
authorized hazardous waste
management program pursuant to
Section 3006 of RCRA and imposes no
requirements other than those currently
imposed by State law. For further
information on how this authorization
complies with applicable executive
orders and statutory provisions, please
see the proposed rule published in the
June 11, 2019, Federal Register at 84 FR
27057. The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
final action will be effective September
26, 2019.
47 CFR Parts 1 and 52
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and
6974(b).
Dated: September 4, 2019.
Cheryl L. Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2019–20553 Filed 9–25–19; 8:45 am]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
[AU Docket No. 19–101; WC Docket No. 17–
192; CC Docket No. 95–155; FCC 19–75]
Auction of Toll Free Numbers in the
833 Code; Notice and Filing
Requirements, Upfront Payments, and
Other Procedures for the 833 Auction;
Bidding Scheduled To Occur on
December 17, 2019
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final action; requirements and
procedures.
AGENCY:
This document summarizes
procedures for the upcoming auction of
certain toll free numbers in the 833 code
(833 Auction). The 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice summarized
here is intended to familiarize
applicants with the procedures and
other requirements governing
participation in the 833 Auction and
provides overview of the post-auction
payment and toll free number
reservation processes and secondary
market transaction disclosures.
DATES: Application to participate in the
833 Auction must be submitted prior to
6:00 p.m. ET on October 18, 2019.
Upfront payments for the 833 Auction
must be received by 6:00 p.m. ET on
November 27, 2019. Bidding in Auction
103 is scheduled to occur on December
17, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
auction legal questions, Scott Mackoul
in the Auctions Division of the Office of
Economics and Analytics at (202) 418–
0660. For toll free number questions,
Matthew Collins in the Wireline
Competition Bureau’s Competition
Policy Division at (202) 418–7141.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Public Notice (833
Auction Procedures Public Notice), AU
Docket No. 19–101; WC Docket No. 17–
192; CC Docket No. 95–155, FCC 19–75,
adopted on August 1, 2019 and released
on August 2, 2019. The complete text of
the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice is available for public inspection
and copying from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET) Monday through
Thursday or from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference
Information Center, 445 12th Street SW,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
The complete text is also available on
the Commission’s website at https://
www.fcc.gov/wireline-competition/
competition-policy-division/numberingresources/833-toll-free-number-auction
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50767
or by using the search function for AU
Docket No. 19–101, WC Docket No. 17–
192, or CC Docket No. 95–155 on the
Commission’s ECFS web page at
www.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Alternative formats
are available to persons with disabilities
by sending an email to FCC504@fcc.gov
or by calling the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
I. General Information
A. Introduction
1. With the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice, the Commission
establishes procedures for the upcoming
auction of certain toll free numbers in
the 833 code (833 Auction). The 833
Auction, which will serve as an
experiment in using competitive
bidding as a way to assign toll free
numbers, will make available 17,638
numbers in the 833 code. Bidding in the
833 Auction will occur on December 17,
2019. The 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice provides details regarding
the procedures, terms, and conditions,
as well as dates and deadlines,
governing participation in the 833
Auction, and an overview of postauction payments and requirements,
including disclosure requirements for
post-auction secondary market
transactions.
B. Background and Relevant Authority
2. In 2018, the Commission modified
its toll free assignment rule in the Toll
Free Assignment Modernization Order,
83 FR 53377, October 23, 2018, to
provide greater flexibility and permit
alternative approaches to assigning
numbers. Specifically, the Commission
added competitive bidding as a method
to assign toll free numbers and, as an
experiment in using this approach,
established the 833 Auction to assign
numbers that were requested by two or
more Responsible Organizations
(‘‘RespOrgs’’) during the 833 pre-code
opening process.
3. The Commission set out the general
framework for the 833 Auction in the
Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order and designated Somos, Inc., the
Toll Free Numbering Administrator, as
the auctioneer. The Commission opened
participation in the 833 Auction to not
only RespOrgs but also potential
subscribers who may wish to participate
directly. The Commission also called for
a pre-bidding process during which it
would seek comment on detailed
auction procedures, as is typical in
Commission auctions.
4. In May 2019, the Commission
initiated the pre-bidding process by
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
50768
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
releasing a public notice seeking
comment on auction procedures to be
used in the 833 Auction. Seven parties
submitted filings in response to the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice, 84 FR
24424, May 28, 2019.
5. Section 251(e)(1) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (the Act), empowers the
Commission to ensure that toll free
numbers are allocated in an equitable
and orderly manner that serves the
public interest. Pursuant to this
statutory mandate, the Commission has
the authority to set policy with respect
to all facets of numbering
administration in the United States, and
must do so in an efficient, fair, and
orderly manner. As in the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order, the
actions the Commission takes in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice are
designed to meet the statutory
requirement that numbers be made
‘‘available on an equitable basis,’’ by
establishing auction and secondary
market procedures that are efficient,
orderly, and fair.
6. In addition to the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order, other
Commission decisions and rules
provide additional information useful to
any party interested in participating in
the 833 Auction. For example, many of
the application and bidding
requirements set forth in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice are
based on the Commission’s general
competitive bidding rules. Thus,
prospective applicants should
familiarize themselves with those rules,
including recent amendments and
clarifications, as well as Commission
decisions in proceedings regarding
competitive bidding procedures and
application requirements.
7. Moreover, as part of their due
diligence responsibilities, applicants
must be thoroughly familiar with the
procedures, terms, and conditions
contained in 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice and any future public
notices that may be released in the 833
Auction proceeding (AU Docket No. 19–
101, WC Docket No. 17–192, CC Docket
No. 95–155). The terms contained in the
Commission’s rules, relevant orders,
and public notices are not negotiable.
The Commission may amend or
supplement the information contained
in its public notices at any time and will
issue public notices to convey new or
supplemental information to applicants.
It is the responsibility of all applicants
to remain current with all Commission
rules and with all public notices
pertaining to the 833 Auction. Copies of
most auctions-related Commission
documents, including public notices,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
can be retrieved at www.fcc.gov/
auctions, and copies of documents
related to the 833 Auction can be
retrieved at https://www.fcc.gov/
wireline-competition/competitionpolicy-division/numbering-resources/
833-auction. Additionally, documents
are available through Somos at https://
auction.somos.com/ and at the
Commission’s headquarters, located at
445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC
20554, during normal business hours.
C. Toll Free Numbers Offered in 833
Auction
8. In the 833 pre-code opening
process, the Commission’s Wireline
Competition Bureau authorized
RespOrgs to identify up to 2,000 desired
numbers in the 833 code and submit a
request for those numbers to Somos.
Somos identified 17,638 toll free
numbers as requested by two or more
RespOrgs and placed those numbers in
unavailable status. In the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order, the
Commission announced that the rights
to use these 17,638 toll free numbers in
the 833 code would be offered in the
833 Auction.
9. The Commission, in the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order,
provided one exception to making these
numbers available in the 833 Auction by
allowing government entities and nonprofit health and safety organizations to
file petitions to set aside numbers from
the auction for use for public health and
safety purposes. On April 16, 2019, the
Wireline Competition Bureau released a
Public Notice seeking petitions to set
aside toll free numbers pursuant to this
exception. No petitions were submitted.
Consequently, all 17,638 numbers
previously identified as having multiple
requests will be offered in the 833
Auction. 833 Auction applicants must
select the toll free numbers (from the
available list) for which they may bid on
their auction applications. If a particular
available toll free number is not selected
on any auction application, it will not
be available in the auction. A complete
list of these 17,638 numbers is available
in electronic format only at https://
auction.somos.com/.
D. Auction Specifics
1. Auctioneer
10. In the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, the Commission
designated Somos as the auctioneer for
the 833 Auction. As such, Somos will be
required to implement the procedures
established in the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice to conduct the
auction, including: Accepting
applications to participate in the
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
bidding (auction applications);
reviewing the applications for
sufficiency; accepting upfront
payments; announcing which applicants
are qualified to bid (qualified bidders);
accepting and processing the bids;
announcing the winning bidders; and
accepting final payments. To
accomplish these tasks, Somos must
provide an online system(s) for the 833
Auction that will accept auction
applications and bids (collectively
Somos Auction System) and Somos
must provide procedures to accept both
upfront and final payments.
2. Auction Dates and Deadlines
11. The following dates and deadlines
apply to the 833 Auction:
Auction Registration, Application, and
Bidding Tutorials Available (via
internet)–No later than September 11,
2019
Auction Application (FCC Form 833)
Filing Window Opens—October 7,
2019; 12:00 noon Eastern Time (ET)
Auction Application (FCC Form 833)
Filing Window Deadline—October 18,
2019; 6:00 p.m. ET
Upfront Payments—November 27, 2019;
6:00 p.m. ET
Mock Auction—December 13, 2019
Bidding in the 833 Auction—December
17, 2019
3. Requirements for Participation
12. Those wishing to participate in
the 833 Auction must:
• Register for an Auction ID online
through the Somos Auction System;
• Submit an auction application (FCC
Form 833) electronically through the
Somos Auction System prior to 6:00
p.m. ET on October 18, 2019, following
filing procedures set forth in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice and
any FCC Form 833 instructions
provided by Somos;
• Submit a sufficient upfront
payment to Somos by 6:00 p.m. ET on
November 27, 2019, following the
procedures set forth in the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice; and
• Comply with all provisions
outlined in the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice and applicable
Commission rules and orders.
II. Implementation of 833 Auction
Principles
13. In the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, the Commission
established certain principles to
promote the transparency and efficiency
of the 833 Auction, and reduce the
potential for conflicts of interest and
anticompetitive strategic behavior by
participants. The Commission sought
comment in the 833 Auction Comment
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Public Notice on specific procedures to
implement these principles, and in the
833 Auction Procedures Public Notice,
the Commission describes how these
principles will be implemented for the
833 Auction.
A. Participation Through Single
Applicant and Application
14. The Commission adopts the
proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to allow a potential
subscriber to participate in the 833
Auction either (1) through a RespOrg
that will bid on all the numbers in
which the subscriber is interested in
acquiring, or (2) by submitting its own
application and bidding for all the
numbers in which it is interested. Thus,
a potential subscriber cannot selectively
choose to be represented by a RespOrg
to bid on its behalf for some numbers
and submit an application on its own to
bid for other numbers.
15. In the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, the Commission
required that potential subscribers
participate in the 833 Auction through
only a single auction applicant. In the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice,
the Commission proposed to implement
this principle by requiring that a
potential subscriber may participate
either through a RespOrg that will bid
on all the numbers that the subscriber
is interested in acquiring, or by
submitting its own application and
bidding for all of the numbers in which
it is interested. The Commission
received one comment on this issue.
CenturyLink agrees with the
Commission’s proposal, asserting that
this ‘‘bright line on participation’’ will
help parties clarify their roles and
promote the integrity of the auction
process. The Commission agrees with
CenturyLink’s assessment and also
believes the proposed application
procedure is consistent with the
requirement that a potential subscriber
may participate through only a single
auction applicant, which is necessary to
implement the prohibition on certain
communications, and with the decision
to prohibit certain agreements among
auction applicants. Thus, the
Commission adopts the application
procedure as proposed. If a potential
subscriber is represented on
applications submitted by multiple
RespOrgs, or files its own application
and is also represented on a RespOrg
application, only one of the applications
on which it is represented may become
qualified to bid (i.e., any additional
subscriber application(s) will be
dismissed and/or any additional
RespOrg applications will not be found
qualified to bid for the potential
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
subscriber’s selected toll free
number(s)).
16. In the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission
proposed two certifications in the
auction application related to the single
applicant/application mandate. First, it
proposed that the auction application
require that each applicant certify that
(i) if it is bidding on its own behalf, it
is also not participating in the auction
through another entity, and/or (ii) if it
is bidding on behalf of potential
subscriber(s), it is not aware that the
potential subscriber(s) are participating
through another applicant. Second, the
Commission proposed requiring each
applicant to certify that it, or any
commonly-controlled entity, is not
submitting multiple applications in the
833 Auction. The Commission received
no comments on the proposed
certifications, and concludes that the
certifications should aid in enforcing
the single applicant/application
mandate. Thus, every applicant must
certify in its auction application that: (1)
It is not participating in the auction
through another entity; (2) it is not
aware that any entity on whose behalf
it is bidding is participating through
another applicant; and (3) it, or any
commonly-controlled entity, is not
submitting multiple applications in the
833 Auction. This language clarifies
language proposed in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice in order to
emphasize that the requirement to bid
only through a single applicant applies
to every applicant, regardless of whether
it is bidding on its own behalf, or on
behalf of another entity. Moreover, by
‘‘commonly-controlled entity,’’ the
Commission means an entity that
controls or is controlled by another
party.
17. To identify commonly controlled
entities in the 833 Auction, the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice
proposed to define a ‘‘controlling
interest’’ as an individual or entity with
positive or negative de jure or de facto
control of the applicant. As noted in the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice,
the Commission’s part 1 rules state that
de jure control includes holding 50
percent or more of the voting stock of
a corporation or holding a general
partnership interest in a partnership.
Ownership interests that are held
indirectly by any party through one or
more intervening corporations may be
determined by successive multiplication
of the ownership percentages for each
link in the vertical ownership chain and
application of the relevant attribution
benchmark to the resulting product,
except that if the ownership percentage
for an interest in any link in the chain
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50769
meets or exceeds 50 percent or
represents actual control, it may be
treated as if it were a 100 percent
interest. De facto control is determined
on a case-by-case basis. Examples of de
facto control include constituting or
appointing 50 percent or more of the
board of directors or management
committee; having authority to appoint,
promote, demote, and fire senior
executives that control the day-to-day
activities of the entity; or playing an
integral role in management decisions.
18. The 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice also sought comment on a
presumption of control by spouses and
immediate family members. In this
context ‘‘immediate family member’’
would mean father, mother, husband,
wife, son, daughter, brother, sister,
father- or mother-in-law, son- or
daughter-in-law, brother- or sister-inlaw, step-father or -mother, step-brother
or -sister, step-son or -daughter, half
brother or sister. The Commission
proposed to place the burden on
applicants to sufficiently demonstrate
that spouses or family members should
not be treated as having an identity of
interest such that it creates common
control, and that where the presumption
has not been adequately rebutted, such
spouses and family members will be
subject to the prohibition on submission
of multiple auction applications by
commonly controlled entities.
19. One commenter, 1–800 Contacts,
opposes the Commission’s proposal for
defining the controlling interests of
auction applicants, arguing that many
toll free number subscribers are
commonly owned ‘‘through large
investment funds or corporate
conglomerates,’’ but ‘‘have no day-today involvement with each other’’ and
therefore, should be allowed to bid
separately without having to develop a
coordinated bidding strategy. 1–800
Contacts advocates a more lenient
approach to controlling interests that
would allow commonly owned (but not
commonly controlled) entities to
participate separately in the auction,
specifically suggesting limiting control
to ‘‘de jure control combined with
actual day-to-day involvement in the
operational activities of the company.’’
20. In the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, the Commission
stated that, while it would seek
comment and decide how to define
parties with common controlling
interests in the pre-auction process, it
anticipated using the Commission’s
definitions adopted for similar purposes
in its spectrum auctions (e.g.,
§ 1.2105(a)(4)(i) of the Commission’s
rules). The Commission is unconvinced
by the arguments of 1–800 Contacts, and
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
50770
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
it adopts the controlling interest
standard as proposed in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice—i.e., an
individual or entity with positive or
negative de jure or de facto control.
Because entities that have control
(either legal control or actual control)
can behave in a coordinated fashion,
entities with common controlling
interests should not be able to
participate through separate entities in
the auction. Moreover, such an
approach is simpler and is consistent
with the Commission’s approach for its
spectrum auctions. As 1–800 Contacts
itself notes, requiring a determination of
actual day-to-day involvement (in
addition to de jure control) would be
subjective and may be difficult for other
auction participants and Somos to
definitively make. Further, unlike 1–800
Contacts, the Commission believes that
the experimental nature of this auction
supports consistency with the same
standard that it uses in Commission
auctions. If it uses the same standard
applied in Commission auctions,
participants in the 833 Auction can rely
on any prior experience in Commission
auctions and on Commission precedent
for guidance. Thus, the Commission
concludes that the controlling interest
standard as proposed in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice is preferable
and therefore adopts the proposal.
21. The Commission received no
comments on the presumption of
control by spouses and immediate
family members proposed in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice.
Therefore, it adopts the presumptions
(and definitions) set forth therein, and
notes that if an applicant wishes to
rebut a presumption of control by a
spouse or family member, it should do
so in a narrative explanation to its
auction application.
22. Additionally, the Commission
reiterates that any 833 Auction
applicants that have overlapping noncontrolling interests must take steps to
prevent communicating bid information
with each other. Specifically, applicants
with overlapping non-controlling
interests must certify they have
established internal controls to preclude
any person acting on behalf of an
applicant from possessing information
about the bids or bidding strategies of
more than one applicant or
communicating such information to
another person acting on behalf of and
possessing such information regarding
another applicant. The Commission will
include such a certification in the
auction application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
B. Prohibition on Certain
Communications and Compliance With
Antitrust Laws
23. Each applicant in the 833 Auction
is prohibited from cooperating or
collaborating with any other applicant
with respect to its own, or one
another’s, or any other competing
applicant’s bids or bidding strategies.
Each applicant will be prohibited from
communicating, with any other
applicant in any manner, the substance
of its own, or one another’s, or any other
competing applicant’s bids or bidding
strategies (including with respect to the
post-auction market for toll free
numbers). The Commission proposed
this prohibition in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice to reinforce
existing antitrust laws, facilitate
detection of collusive conduct, and
deter anticompetitive behavior. The
Commission received no comments on
this proposal and therefore, for the
reasons stated in proposing it, the
Commission adopts the prohibition on
certain communications for the 833
Auction.
1. Entities Subject to the Prohibition on
Certain Communications
24. For purposes of the prohibition on
certain communications, an ‘‘applicant’’
in the 833 Auction includes: (i) All
controlling interests in the entity
submitting the auction application; (ii)
all holders of partnership and other
ownership interests and any stock
interest amounting to 10 percent or
more of the entity, or outstanding stock,
or outstanding voting stock of the entity
submitting the auction application; (iii)
all officers and directors of that entity;
and (iv) any entity listed as a potential
subscriber on whose behalf the entity
submitting the auction application will
be bidding. As in the Commission’s
spectrum auctions, in the case of a
consortium, each member of the
consortium shall be considered to have
a controlling interest in the consortium.
The Commission proposed in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice to
define ‘‘applicant’’ broadly for the
purposes of the prohibition on certain
communications, consistent with its
spectrum license and universal service
support auctions. One commenter, 1–
800 Contacts, supports the proposal,
stating that applying the prohibition
broadly ‘‘will help ensure the integrity
of the auction process.’’ The
Commission agrees with this assessment
and adopts the definition of applicant
for purposes of the prohibition as
proposed.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Prohibition Applies Until Final
Payment With Late Fee Deadline
25. The prohibition on certain
communications for the 833 Auction
will begin at the deadline for submitting
auction applications (i.e., 6:00 p.m. on
October 18, 2019) and will end at the
deadline for winning bidders to submit
their final payments with a late fee (i.e.,
15 business days after the winning
bidders are announced).
26. In the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission stated
that the prohibition on certain
communications will begin at the
auction application deadline and will
end ‘‘at the post-auction deadline for
winning bidders to submit their final
payments (which will be announced by
Somos after bidding concludes).’’ The
Commission clarifies that, for ‘‘final
payment deadline,’’ it will use the
deadline for winning bidders to submit
their final payments with a late fee. In
the Commission’s spectrum auctions,
the prohibition on certain
communications runs until the down
payment deadline, and in its auctions
for universal service support, the
prohibition runs until the post-auction
deadline for winning bidders to submit
applications for support. For the 833
Auction, because winning bidders have
neither a down payment nor a postauction application requirement, the
most analogous point is the final
payment. However, the final payment in
this auction can be made up to an
additional five business days after the
final payment deadline so long as it is
submitted with a late fee. Since the
rationale to extend the prohibited
communications period until after
bidding applies equally during the
period in which an applicant can
submit the final payment with a late fee,
the Commission clarifies that the
prohibition will run until that last
deadline (i.e., 15 business days after
Somos announces the winning bidders).
3. Scope of the Prohibition on Certain
Communications
27. As proposed in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice, an applicant
will be prohibited from communicating,
with any other applicant in any manner,
the substance of its own, or one
another’s, or any other competing
applicant’s bids or bidding strategies
(including with respect to the postauction market for toll free numbers). In
addition to express statements of bids
and bidding strategies, the prohibition
against communicating ‘‘in any
manner’’ includes public disclosures as
well as private communications and
indirect or implicit communications.
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Consequently, an applicant must take
care to determine whether its auctionrelated communications may reach
another applicant. The Commission
reminds applicants that they must
determine whether their
communications with other parties are
permissible once the prohibition begins
at the deadline for submitting auction
applications, even before the public
notice identifying applicants is released.
28. Applicants should take special
care in circumstances where their
officers, directors, and employees may
receive information directly or
indirectly relating to any applicant’s
bids or bidding strategies. Such
information may be deemed to have
been received by the applicant under
certain circumstances. For example,
Commission staff have found that where
an individual serves as an officer and
director for two or more applicants, the
bids and bidding strategies of one
applicant are presumed conveyed to the
other applicant through the shared
officer, which creates an apparent
violation of the rule.
29. As noted in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice, the prohibition
will not apply to all communications
between or among applicants; it will
apply only to any communications
conveying, in whole or part, directly or
indirectly, the applicant’s or a
competing applicant’s bids or bidding
strategy (including with respect to the
post-auction market for toll free
numbers). Thus, communications,
including business discussions and
negotiations, unrelated to the toll free
numbers being offered in the 833
Auction and that do not convey
information about the numbers being
auctioned or bidding strategies are not
prohibited. Moreover, not all auctionrelated information is necessarily
covered by the prohibition. For
example, communicating merely
whether a party has or has not applied
to participate in the 833 Auction should
not violate the prohibition. In contrast,
communicating how a party will
participate, including specific numbers
or bid amounts, and/or whether or not
a party will place bids, would convey
bid or bidding strategies and therefore is
prohibited.
30. Although the restriction does not
prohibit business discussions and
negotiations among auction applicants
that are not auction related, each
applicant must remain vigilant not to
communicate, directly or indirectly,
information that affects, or could affect,
bids or bidding strategies. Certain
discussions might touch upon subject
matters that could convey price or
geographic information related to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
bidding strategies. Such subject areas
include, but are not limited to,
management, sales, local marketing
agreements, and other transactional
agreements.
31. The Commission also cautions
applicants that bids or bidding strategies
may be communicated outside of
situations that involve one party subject
to the prohibition communicating
privately and directly with another such
party. For example, the Commission has
warned that prohibited
‘‘communications concerning bids and
bidding strategies may include
communications regarding capital calls
or requests for additional funds in
support of bids or bidding strategies to
the extent such communications convey
information concerning the bids and
bidding strategies directly or
indirectly.’’ Moreover, the Commission
previously found a violation of the rule
against prohibited communications
when an applicant used the
Commission’s bidding system to
disclose ‘‘its bidding strategy in a
manner that explicitly invited other
auction participants to cooperate and
collaborate . . . in specific markets’’
and has placed auction participants on
notice that the use of its bidding system
‘‘to disclose market information to
competitors will not be tolerated and
will subject bidders to sanctions.’’
32. Likewise, when completing an
auction application, each applicant
should avoid any statements or
disclosures that may violate the
prohibition on certain communications,
particularly in light of the limited
information procedures in effect for the
833 Auction. Specifically, an applicant
should avoid including any information
in its auction application that might
convey information regarding its toll
free number selections, as applicable,
such as referring to certain toll free
numbers in describing agreements,
including any information in
application attachments that will be
publicly available that may otherwise
disclose the applicant’s toll free number
selections, or using applicant names
that refer to numbers being offered.
33. Applicants also should be mindful
that communicating non-public
application or bidding information
publicly or privately to another
applicant may violate the prohibition on
certain communications even though
that information subsequently may be
made public during later periods of the
application or bidding processes.
4. Communicating With Third Parties
34. The 833 Auction’s prohibition on
certain communications does not
prohibit an applicant from
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50771
communicating bids or bidding
strategies to a third-party, such as a
consultant or consulting firm, counsel,
or lender. The applicant should take
appropriate steps, however, to ensure
that any third party it employs for
advice pertaining to its bids or bidding
strategies does not become a conduit for
prohibited communications to other
specified parties, as that would violate
the prohibition. For example, an
applicant might require a third party,
such as a lender, to sign a nondisclosure agreement before the
applicant communicates any
information regarding bids or bidding
strategy to the third party. Within thirdparty firms, separate individual
employees, such as attorneys or auction
consultants, may advise individual
applicants on bids or bidding strategies,
as long as such firms implement
firewalls and other compliance
procedures that prevent such
individuals from communicating the
bids or bidding strategies of one
applicant to other individuals
representing separate applicants.
Although firewalls and/or other
procedures should be used, their
existence is not an absolute defense to
liability if a violation has occurred.
35. As Commission staff have
explained in the context of the
Broadcast Incentive Auction, in the case
of an individual, the objective
precautionary measure of a firewall is
not available. As a result, an individual
that is privy to bids or bidding
information of more than one applicant
presents a greater risk of becoming a
conduit for a prohibited
communication. The Commission will
take the same approach to interpreting
the prohibited communications rule in
the 833 Auction. Moreover, the
Commission emphasizes that whether a
prohibited communication has taken
place in a given case will depend on all
the facts pertaining to the case,
including who possessed what
information, what information was
conveyed to whom, and the course of
bidding in the auction.
36. For purposes of the 833 Auction,
the Commission prohibits separate
applicants from designating the same
individual on their auction applications
to serve as an authorized bidder. This
prevents a single individual with
knowledge of the bidding strategies of
more than one applicant from conveying
(even unintentionally) advice to any of
those applicants that is influenced by
his or her knowledge about another
applicant’s bids or bidding strategies in
violation of the prohibition on certain
communications among auction
applicants. A violation of the
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
50772
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
prohibition could also occur if the
authorized bidders are different
individuals employed by the same
organization (e.g., a law firm,
engineering firm, or consulting firm). In
the latter case, at a minimum, applicants
should certify on their applications that
precautionary steps have been taken to
prevent communications between
authorized bidders and that the
applicant and its bidders will comply
with the prohibition on certain
communications.
37. The Commission reminds
potential applicants that they may
discuss the auction application or bids
for specific toll free numbers with the
counsel, consultant, or expert of their
choice before the auction application
deadline. Furthermore, the same thirdparty individual could continue to give
advice regarding the application after
the deadline, provided that no
information pertaining to bids or
bidding strategies, including toll free
numbers selected on the auction
application, is conveyed to that
individual. To the extent potential
applicants can develop bidding
instructions prior to the application
deadline that a third-party could
implement without changes during
bidding, the third-party could follow
such instructions for multiple
applicants provided that those
applicants do not communicate with the
third-party during the prohibition
period.
38. Applicants also should use
caution in their dealings with other
parties, such as members of the press,
financial analysts, or others who might
become conduits for the communication
of prohibited bidding information. For
example, even though communicating
that it has applied to participate in the
auction will not violate the prohibition,
an applicant’s statement to the press of
its intent not to place bids in the auction
could give rise to a finding of a
prohibited communications violation.
5. Certifications Related to the
Prohibition on Certain Communications
39. When submitting its auction
application, each applicant for the 833
Auction must certify its compliance
with the prohibition on certain
communications. One commenter
supports this certification. As in the
Commission’s spectrum and universal
service support auctions, the mere filing
of a certifying statement as part of an
application will not outweigh specific
evidence that a prohibited
communication has occurred, nor will it
preclude the initiation of an
investigation when warranted. Any
applicant found to have violated the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
prohibition on certain communications
may be subject to sanctions, including
among other things, forfeiture and a
prohibition from participating further in
the 833 Auction and in any future
Commission auctions.
6. Duty To Report Prohibited
Communications
40. Any applicant that makes or
receives a communication that appears
to violate the prohibition on certain
communications must report such
communication in writing to the
Commission and Somos staff
immediately, and in no case later than
five business days after the
communication occurs. The
Commission proposed this requirement
in the 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice and received no comments on
the proposal. Each applicant’s
obligation to report any such
communication continues beyond the
five-day period after the communication
is made, even if the report is not made
within the five-day period.
7. Procedures for Reporting Prohibited
Communications
41. A party reporting any information
or communication that appears to
violate the prohibition on certain
communications must take care to
ensure that any report does not itself
violate the prohibition. To minimize the
risk of inadvertent dissemination of
information in such reports, parties
reporting a potential prohibited
communication must submit a report
directly to the following individuals: (1)
Margaret W. Wiener, Chief, Auctions
Division, Office of Economics and
Analytics, by email to 833auction@
fcc.gov; and (2) Joel Bernstein, Vice
President, Regulatory and Public Policy,
Somos, by email to auctionhelp@
somos.com.
42. Given the potential competitive
sensitivity of public disclosure of
information in such a report, a party
seeking to report such a prohibited
communication should consider
submitting its report with a request that
the report or portions of the submission
be withheld from public inspection by
following the procedures specified in
§ 0.459 of the Commission’s rules. Such
parties should use the contact
information provided in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice to
consult with Somos and Commission
staff about the procedures for submitting
such reports.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8. Additional FCC Auction Information
Concerning the Prohibition on Certain
Communications
43. The Commission adopts its
proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to rely on past precedent
and guidance regarding its rules on
prohibited communications in
connection with Commission spectrum
auctions. The Commission received no
comments on this proposal. A summary
listing of documents addressing the
application of § 1.2105(c) of the
Commission’s rules (the rule on
prohibited communications for
Commission spectrum auctions) is
available on the Commission’s auction
web page at https://www.fcc.gov/
summary-listing-documents-addressingapplication-rule-prohibiting-certaincommunications/.
9. Antitrust Laws
44. Regardless of compliance with the
Commission’s rules, applicants remain
subject to the antitrust laws, which are
designed to prevent anticompetitive
behavior in the marketplace.
Compliance with the duty to report
prohibited communications will not
insulate a party from enforcement of the
antitrust laws. For instance, a violation
of the antitrust laws could arise out of
actions taking place well before any
party submits an auction application.
The Commission has cited a number of
examples of potentially anticompetitive
actions that would be prohibited under
antitrust laws: for example, actual or
potential competitors may not agree to
divide territories in order to minimize
competition, regardless of whether they
split a market in which they both do
business, or whether they merely
reserve one market for one and another
market for the other.
45. To the extent the Commission
becomes aware of specific allegations
that suggest that violations of the
Federal antitrust laws may have
occurred, the Commission may refer
such allegations to the United States
Department of Justice for investigation.
If an applicant is found to have violated
the antitrust laws or the Commission’s
rules in connection with its
participation in the competitive bidding
process, it may be subject to a forfeiture
and may be prohibited from
participating further in the 833 Auction
and in future auctions, among other
sanctions.
C. Restrictions on Agreements
46. To ensure the competitiveness of
the 833 Auction, the Commission
proposed certain restrictions on
agreements related to the toll free
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
numbers being auctioned. The 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice
addresses the proposals raised in the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice to
restrict agreements among auction
applicants and agreements among
RespOrgs and to disclose agreements
between RespOrgs and potential
subscribers.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
1. Agreements Among Applicants
47. The Commission adopts its
proposal in the Auction 833 Comment
Public Notice to prohibit certain
agreements among applicants in the 833
Auction (regardless of whether the
applicants are RespOrgs or potential
subscribers). The Commission received
no comments on this proposal. The
prohibition applies to any agreements,
arrangements, or understandings of any
kind to which the applicant (including
any party that controls or is controlled
by the applicant) is a party relating to
the toll free numbers being auctioned
that address or communicate directly or
indirectly bids (including specific
prices), bidding strategies (including the
specific numbers on which to bid or not
to bid), or the post-auction market for
toll free numbers.
48. The Commission also adopts its
proposal to define ‘‘applicant’’ for these
purposes broadly to include: All
controlling interests in the entity
submitting the auction application; all
holders of partnership and other
ownership interests and any stock
interest amounting to 10 percent or
more of the entity, or outstanding stock,
or outstanding voting stock of the entity
submitting the auction application; all
officers and directors of that entity; and
any entity listed as a potential
subscriber on whose behalf the entity
submitting the auction application will
be bidding. Although the definition of
‘‘applicant’’ for these purposes includes
any entity listed as a potential
subscriber on whose behalf the entity
submitting the auction application will
be bidding, the restriction does not
prohibit the agreement necessary to
provide authorization to the RespOrg
applicant.
49. This prohibition will not apply to
agreements unrelated to the toll free
numbers being offered in the 833
Auction. Business discussions and
negotiations that are unrelated to
bidding in the 833 Auction and that do
not convey information about the
numbers being auctioned or bidding
strategies are not prohibited, and thus,
agreements reached by such
communications unrelated to the toll
free numbers being auctioned will not
be prohibited.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
50773
3. Agreements Between RespOrgs and
Potential Subscribers
applicant RespOrg and a potential
subscriber for which it is applying to
bid should be formally authorized and
transparent so that it can be easily
verified. To that end, the Commission
proposed to require any applicant
RespOrg that bids for a potential
subscriber to acquire a letter of
authorization from the potential
subscriber. No comments were received
on the proposal. Based on the need to
verify the relationship, the Commission
will require a letter of authorization that
clearly identifies the parties (both the
potential subscriber and RespOrg) and
toll free number(s) in which the
RespOrg will bid for the potential
subscriber. That letter must be dated
and signed by the potential subscriber.
Moreover, because an applicant
RespOrg bidding on behalf of a potential
subscriber is ultimately responsible for
complying with all post-auction
requirements, it is the responsibility of
the applicant RespOrg to ensure the
authorization by the potential subscriber
is adequate (e.g., has been signed by a
person with authority to bind the
entity).
54. The 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice also sought comment on whether
to require any applicant RespOrg
bidding on behalf of a potential
subscriber to provide the letter of
authorization as part of its auction
application (e.g., by uploading it as an
attachment) or to allow the applicant
RespOrg to certify that it is in
possession of the letter and be able to
produce it to the Commission if
requested. The Commission received no
comments on either option. Since the
upload process should not be
burdensome and uploading the
document should help Somos verify the
relationship, the Commission will
require any applicant RespOrg that is
bidding on behalf of a potential
subscriber to upload the letter of
authorization as part of its auction
application. The Commission directs
Somos to withhold the public disclosure
of these attachments until after the
bidding, since the letters of
authorization will contain specific
information on toll free numbers being
sought by the potential subscriber.
53. Any applicant RespOrg that bids
for a potential subscriber must acquire
a letter of authorization from the
potential subscriber. In the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice, the
Commission recognized the unique
position of RespOrgs, in that they can
participate in the auction both on their
own behalf and on behalf of other
entities. Thus, the Commission believes
that the relationship between an
D. Limited Information Procedures
During the Auction Process
55. Consistent with the procedures in
many recent Commission auctions, the
Commission adopts its proposal that
Somos conduct the 833 Auction using
procedures for limited information
disclosure (sometimes also referred to as
anonymous bidding). The Commission
received no comments on its proposal to
use limited information procedures.
2. Agreements Among RespOrgs
50. The Commission prohibits
auction-related agreements among
RespOrgs even where only one of the
RespOrgs is an applicant in the 833
Auction. The Commission received no
comments on the restriction proposed in
the 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice. Given RespOrgs’ position in the
toll free number market, the
Commission adopts its proposal to
prohibit any applicant RespOrg from
having an agreement related to the toll
free numbers being offered in the 833
Auction with a non-applicant RespOrg.
Thus, any RespOrg interested in
acquiring the rights to any of the toll
free numbers being auctioned must
participate in the auction directly.
51. Similar to the prohibition on
agreements among applicants, the
prohibition among RespOrgs will not
apply to agreements unrelated to the toll
free numbers being offered in the 833
Auction. Because business discussions
and negotiations that are unrelated to
bidding in the 833 Auction and that do
not convey information about the
numbers being auctioned or bidding
strategies are not prohibited, agreements
reached by such communications
unrelated to the toll free numbers being
auctioned will not be prohibited.
52. In addition, the prohibition on
agreements among RespOrgs would not
apply to RespOrgs that are commonly
controlled. Commonly-controlled
entities are those in which the same
individual or entity either directly or
indirectly holds a controlling interest
(as determined by positive or negative
de jure or de facto control). When
RespOrgs share a common officer or
director or control, the Commission
presumes that bids and bid strategies
will be communicated. Moreover, the
Commission reiterates, since commonly
controlled RespOrgs cannot submit
multiple applications, if they wish to
apply for the 833 Auction, they will
need to choose one of the entities to be
the applicant and disclose the existence
of the other commonly-controlled
RespOrgs in the application.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
50774
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Thus, the Commission directs Somos to
withhold, until after the close of bidding
and announcement of auction results,
the public release of bidders’ particular
833 number selections and any
information that may reveal the
identities of bidders placing bids and
taking other bidding-related actions.
More specifically, the following
information will not be made public
until after bidding has closed: (1) The
numbers that an applicant selects for
bidding in its auction application, (2)
the amount of any upfront payment
made by or on behalf of an applicant for
the 833 Auction, (3) any applicant’s
bidding eligibility, and (4) any other
bidding-related information that might
reveal the identity of the bidder placing
a bid or the amount of the bid.
56. Because the 833 Auction will be
conducted using a single round of
bidding, the Commission does not
anticipate that there will be the same
need for release of bidding-related
actions during the auction that there
would be in a multiple-round auction.
If such circumstances were to arise prior
to the release of non-public information
and auction results, however, the
Commission directs Somos to avoid
releasing any information that may
indicate the identity of any bidders
taking such actions.
57. Moreover, after receiving no
comments on the proposal in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice to
make public bidders’ number selections,
upfront payment amounts, bids, and any
other bidding-related actions and
information after the close of bidding,
the Commission adopts the proposal.
The Commission believes making this
information available to the public, after
bidding is complete, will increase
auction transparency and allow the
public generally to evaluate the
experiment in using competitive
bidding as a toll free number assignment
method.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
E. Responsibility for Winning Bid
Payment
58. Any 833 Auction applicant,
including a RespOrg participating on
behalf of one or more potential
subscribers, assumes a binding
obligation to pay its full winning bid
amount, and is responsible for
complying with all post-auction
requirements, regardless of whether a
potential subscriber on whose behalf the
RespOrg bid fulfills its financial or
contractual obligation to the RespOrg.
While an applicant RespOrg may seek
reimbursement from the potential
subscriber for which it bid, the
RespOrg—as the bidder in the auction—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
is ultimately responsible for full
payment of any winning bid.
III. Applying To Participate in the 833
Auction
A. General Information Regarding the
Auction Application
59. Any party interested in obtaining
an 833 number available through the
auction must submit an application
(FCC Form 833) to become qualified to
bid in the 833 Auction. An application
to participate in the 833 Auction,
referred to in the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice as an ‘‘auction
application,’’ provides information that
Somos, as the auctioneer, will use to
determine whether the applicant is
qualified to participate in the auction.
Eligibility to participate in the 833
Auction is based on an applicant’s
auction application, including its
certifications made under penalty of
perjury, and on the applicant’s
submission of a sufficient upfront
payment for the auction.
60. A party seeking to participate in
the 833 Auction must file an FCC Form
833 electronically via the Somos
Auction System prior to 6:00 p.m. ET on
October 18, 2019, following the
procedures prescribed in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice and
any FCC Form 833 instructions
provided by Somos. The 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice describes
more fully the information disclosures
and certifications required in the
auction application. An applicant that
files an application to participate in the
833 Auction will be subject to the
prohibition on certain communications,
beginning at the deadline for filing
auction applications—6:00 p.m. ET on
October 18, 2019. The prohibition will
end for applicants on the post-auction
final payment (with late fee) deadline.
Each applicant remains subject to the
prohibition until the end of the
prohibition period, regardless of
whether or not it becomes qualified to
bid or actually submits any bids.
61. An applicant bears full
responsibility for submitting an
accurate, complete, and timely auction
application. Each applicant must make
a series of certifications under penalty
of perjury on its FCC Form 833 related
to the information provided in its
application and its participation in the
auction. If an applicant fails to make the
required certifications in its FCC Form
833 by the filing deadline, its
application will be deemed
unacceptable for filing and cannot be
corrected after the filing deadline.
62. An applicant should note that
submitting an FCC Form 833 (and any
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
amendments thereto) constitutes a
representation by the certifying official
that he or she is an authorized
representative of the applicant with
authority to bind the applicant, that he
or she has read the form’s instructions
and certifications, and that the contents
of the application, its certifications, and
any attachments are true and correct.
Submitting a false certification in an
application may result in penalties,
including monetary forfeitures, license
forfeitures, ineligibility to participate in
future auctions, and/or criminal
prosecution.
63. Applicants are cautioned that
because the required information
submitted in an FCC Form 833 bears on
each applicant’s qualifications, requests
for confidential treatment will not be
routinely granted. The Commission has
held generally that it may publicly
release confidential business
information where the party has put that
information at issue in a Commission
proceeding or where the Commission
has identified a compelling public
interest in disclosing the information.
64. A party may not submit more than
one auction application for the 833
Auction. Similarly, a party can
participate in the 833 Auction only
through a single bidding entity; either it
can participate indirectly through a
RespOrg or directly by submitting its
own application. As in Commission
spectrum auctions, if a party submits
multiple auction applications, only one
application may be the basis for that
party to become qualified to bid in the
auction.
65. After the initial auction
application filing deadline, Somos staff
will review all timely submitted
applications for the 833 Auction to
determine whether each application
complies with the application
requirements and whether it has
provided all required information
concerning the applicant’s
qualifications for bidding. After this
review is completed, Somos, in its
capacity as auctioneer, will release a
public notice identifying the
applications as complete or incomplete,
and will establish an application
resubmission filing window, during
which an applicant may make
permissible minor modifications to its
application to address identified
deficiencies. The public notice will
include the deadline for resubmitting
modified applications. To become a
qualified bidder, an applicant must have
a complete application (i.e., have timely
corrected any identified deficiencies)
and make a timely and sufficient
upfront payment. After review of
resubmitted applications is complete,
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Somos will issue a public notice
identifying the applicants that are
qualified to bid. Somos should release
this notice at least five business days
before the bidding (i.e., by December 10,
2019).
66. The 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice provides additional
details regarding certain information
required to be submitted in the FCC
Form 833. In addition, an applicant
should consult the Commission’s rules,
the Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order, and any additional releases
specific to the 833 Auction (including
instructions on submitting a FCC Form
833 provided by Somos) to ensure that,
in addition to the materials described in
the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice, all required information is
included in its auction application. To
the extent the information in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice does
not address a potential applicant’s
specific operating structure, or if the
applicant needs additional information
or guidance concerning the following
disclosure requirements, the applicant
should review the educational materials
for the 833 Auction and/or use the
contact information provided in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice to
consult with Somos and Commission
staff to better understand the
information it must submit in its
auction application.
B. 833 Auction Number Selection
67. Each 833 Auction applicant must
identify in its auction application any
toll free number (from the list of
available 833 numbers) on which it may
wish to place a bid during the auction.
Moreover, for each number it selects,
the applicant must identify the party
(either itself or another party) for which
it is bidding.
68. The 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice proposed requiring applicants to
select the toll free numbers for which
they are interested in bidding and, for
each number, identify the party for
which it is bidding to allow Somos to
verify that a potential subscriber is
seeking to bid based on only one
application and make it clear to
applicants that they can represent only
one entity per number, including itself.
The Commission received no comments
on this proposal. Therefore, based for
the reasons set forth in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice, the
Commission adopts this application
requirement.
69. The Commission also adopts its
proposal to consider any change made
to the numbers selected on an
application or the party for which an
applicant is bidding to be a major
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
modification of the application, which
will result in a dismissal of the
application. Finalizing the list of
potential toll free numbers and parties
for which applicants may be bidding
provides certainty in the application
review and auction qualification
process. Therefore, the Commission
requires applicants to select the toll free
numbers and identify the party for
which it is bidding on its application by
the application deadline. If qualified to
bid in the auction, the entity will not be
obligated to place a bid on each of the
numbers selected in its application, but
an entity will not be able to bid on any
numbers that it does not select in its
application. If a particular available toll
free number is not selected on any
auction application, it will not be
available in the auction.
70. Moreover, the Commission directs
Somos to withhold from public
disclosure the 833 toll free numbers
selected by an applicant on its auction
application until after the bidding is
complete. The Commission received no
comments on its proposal in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice to
make public the name of party (or
parties) for which an applicant is
bidding once Somos announces which
applications are complete or
incomplete. The Commission adopts the
proposal because, consistent with the
practice in Commission spectrum
auctions, it finds that competition will
be enhanced by withholding certain
information, such as toll free number
selections, from other applicants, while
still providing bidders with information
that will allow them to accurately assess
the legitimacy of their auction
opponents.
C. Ownership Disclosure Requirements
71. Any party interested in
participating in the 833 Auction must
provide, in its auction application, the
same level of ownership disclosure
required in Commission spectrum
auctions under § 1.2112(a) of the
Commission’s rules. Thus, each
applicant must disclose: (1) The real
party or parties in interest of the
applicant or of the application; (2) any
direct interest holder of 10 percent or
greater; (3) any indirect interest holder
of 10 percent or greater; and (4) any
FCC-regulated entity or applicant for an
FCC license in which the applicant, any
real party in interest, or any direct
interest holder of 10 percent or greater,
owns 10 percent or more stock, whether
voting or non-voting. An applicant must
list all parties holding indirect
ownership interests in the applicant as
determined by successive multiplication
of the ownership percentages for each
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50775
link in the vertical ownership chain that
equals 10 percent or more of the
applicant, except that if the ownership
percentage for an interest in any link in
the chain exceeds 50 percent or
represents actual control, it shall be
treated and reported as if it were a 100
percent interest.
72. The 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice proposed using the ownership
disclosure rule used in Commission
spectrum auctions. One commenter
argued that the disclosure requirements
of § 1.2112(a) are unnecessary for the
833 Auction. Specifically, 1–800
Contacts argues that the 10 percent
disclosure threshold for direct and
indirect interest holders may be relevant
to commercial wireless service auctions
(because of spectrum aggregation limits)
or broadcast auctions (because of
multiple ownership, cross ownership
and foreign ownership), but not toll free
number auctions because toll free
numbers have no such limits. 1–800
Contacts therefore argues that the
proposed disclosure requirement is
‘‘exceedingly burdensome, particularly
on prospective auction participants that
may be held through complex private
investment funds.’’ In lieu of such
disclosure, 1–800 Contacts proposes
that auction applicants certify that they
and their attributable interest holders
are in compliance with the
Commission’s auction rules, including
the prohibition on certain
communications.
73. While 1–800 Contacts is correct
that the ownership disclosure
requirements of § 1.2112 aid in the
Commission’s enforcement of certain
restrictions, such as ownership limits,
1–800 Contacts fails to account for the
fact that the 10 percent reporting
requirements provide other benefits to
the other auction participants.
Responding to similar arguments against
ownership disclosure made in the Part
1 competitive bidding proceeding, the
Commission stated that the 10 percent
reporting requirement ‘‘helps competing
bidders accurately assess the legitimacy
of their auction opponents and . . . aids
bidders by providing them with
information about their auction
competitors and alerting them to entities
subject to [the Commission’s] anticollusion rules.’’ Such reasoning applies
in the 833 Auction as well. As 1–800
Contacts itself supports the broad
application of the prohibition on certain
communications, other auction
participants rely on the ownership
disclosure in auction applications to
know with which parties they are
prohibited from communicating.
Moreover, the Commission disagrees
that such disclosure is overly
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
50776
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
burdensome. Auction applicants have
provided such information in a variety
of Commission auctions for over 20
years, and such information provides
transparency regarding the identity of
auction participants—not only to the
Commission, but also to other auction
participants and the public generally.
Thus, the Commission adopts its
proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to require the same level
of ownership disclosure required in
§ 1.2112(a) of the Commission’s rules.
D. Disclosure of Agreements and
Bidding Arrangements
74. To the extent that an applicant
may be a party to an auction-related
agreement, it must disclose the
agreement on its auction application.
Specifically, the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice proposed to require an
applicant to provide in its auction
application a brief description of, and
identify each party to, any partnerships,
joint ventures, consortia or agreements,
arrangements, or understandings of any
kind relating to the toll free numbers
being auctioned, including any
agreements that address or
communicate directly or indirectly bids
(including specific prices), bidding
strategies (including the specific
licenses on which to bid or not to bid),
or the post-auction market structure, to
which the applicant, or any party that
controls or is controlled by the
applicant, is a party. For purposes of
this disclosure, a controlling interest
includes all individuals or entities with
positive or negative de jure or de facto
control of the applicant. The
Commission received no comments on
this proposal. Because disclosure of
these arrangements provides
transparency about the auction
applicants and any parties with whom
they have entered into agreements
regarding the toll free numbers being
offered in the auction, the Commission
adopts this disclosure requirement.
Additionally, if an applicant in the 833
Auction is a potential subscriber but is
also bidding on behalf of another
potential subscriber, it would need to
disclose the existence of such an
agreement. In such circumstances, the
applicant would need to briefly describe
the agreement, but must not disclose the
toll free number(s) for which it is
bidding on behalf of the other potential
subscriber(s).
75. In connection with the agreement
disclosure requirement, the applicant
must certify under penalty of perjury in
its auction application that it has
described, and identified each party to,
any such agreements, arrangements, or
understandings into which it has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
entered. An applicant that enters into
any agreement relating to the toll free
numbers being auctioned after the
auction application deadline is subject
to the same disclosure obligations it
would be for agreements existing at the
application deadline, and it must
maintain the accuracy and completeness
of the information in its pending
auction application.
76. For purposes of making the
required agreement disclosures on the
auction application, if parties agree in
principle on all material terms prior to
the application filing deadline, the
applicant must provide a brief
description of, and identify the other
party or parties to, the agreement, even
if the agreement has not been reduced
to writing. However, if the parties have
not agreed in principle by the
application filing deadline, the
applicant should not describe, or
include the names of parties to, the
discussions on its application.
77. Finally, the Commission sought
comment in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice on the level of disclosure
for auction-related agreements, noting
that in its spectrum auctions, an
applicant must disclose certain limited
information about the agreements in
their pre-auction short-form
applications (e.g., the parties to the
agreement and a brief summary of the
agreements), while winning bidders
often may be required to provide more
detailed information about the
agreements in their post-auction longform applications. The Commission
received no comments on this issue. It
concludes that, for the 833 Auction, it
is sufficient to require applicants to
identify the parties and provide a brief
description of the agreement because it
will provide enough detail to
understand the arrangement without
being overly burdensome on auction
applicants. When identifying the parties
to any agreement, and providing a brief
description of such, applicants should
take care to avoid providing any details
that would indicate specific toll free
numbers.
E. Authorized Bidders
78. An applicant must designate at
least one individual as an authorized
bidder, and no more than three, in its
auction application. In the
Commission’s spectrum auctions, the
rules prohibit an individual from
serving as an authorized bidder for more
than one auction applicant. This
restriction ensures that a single
individual with knowledge of the
bidding strategies of more than one
applicant cannot become even an
unwitting conduit of bidding
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
information between those applicants in
violation of the Commission’s
prohibition on certain communications
among auction applicants. The
Commission finds that a similar
restriction would be serve the integrity
of the 833 Auction, and accordingly, it
prohibits an individual from serving as
an authorized bidder for more than one
auction applicant in the 833 Auction.
F. Provisions Regarding Current
Defaulters
79. The Commission adopts its
proposal in the Auction 833 Comment
Public Notice to adhere to its practice in
Commission spectrum auctions
regarding current defaults and
delinquencies and to require each
applicant in the 833 Auction to certify
that it is not currently in default or
delinquent on a non-tax debt to the
Federal Government. The Commission
received no comments on the proposal
and takes this step to preserve the
integrity of the auction process and to
ensure that bidders are capable of
meeting their financial commitments.
As is the Commission’s practice in
spectrum auctions, an applicant will be
considered a ‘‘current defaulter’’ or
‘‘current delinquent’’ when it, any of its
affiliates, any of its controlling interests,
or any of the affiliates of its controlling
interests, is in default on any payment
for any Commission construction permit
or license (including a down payment)
or is delinquent on any non-tax debt
owed to any Federal agency.
80. Also consistent with Commission
spectrum auctions, the applicant’s
status as a current defaulter will be
determined as of the auction application
deadline. After the deadline, an
applicant can dispute the status of the
debt, but as noted in the 833 Auction
Comment Pubic Notice and consistent
with the Commission’s practice in
spectrum auctions, applicants will not
be able to cure the default or
delinquency after the auction
application deadline to participate in
the auction. Thus, prospective
applicants should pay any delinquent
debts prior to the auction application
deadline.
81. In addition to the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice, applicants are
encouraged to review previous guidance
on default and delinquency disclosure
requirements in the context of the
auction application process. Parties are
also encouraged to consult with the
Somos staff if they have any questions
about default and delinquency
disclosure requirements.
82. Applicants are encouraged to
check the Commission’s Red Light
Display System for information
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
regarding debts currently owed to the
Commission. To access the
Commission’s Red Light Display
System, go to: https://apps.fcc.gov/
redlight/login.cfm. The Commission
reminds each applicant, however, that
its Red Light Display System may not be
determinative of an auction applicant’s
ability to comply with the default and
delinquency disclosure requirements
(e.g., an applicant may be delinquent on
a non-tax debt to another Federal
agency). Thus, an auction applicant’s
lack of current ‘‘red light’’ status is not
necessarily determinative of its
eligibility to participate in the auction.
The Commission strongly encourages
each applicant to carefully review all
records and other available Federal
agency databases and information
sources to determine whether the
applicant, or any of its affiliates, or any
of its controlling interests, or any of the
affiliates of its controlling interests,
owes or was ever delinquent in the
payment of non-tax debt owed to any
Federal agency.
G. Additional Disclosures and
Certifications
83. In the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission sought
comment on whether there are other
certifications that it should consider
requiring auction applicants to make in
order to become qualified to bid in the
833 Auction or any legal restrictions
that may be relevant. The Commission
received no comments and therefore
concludes no further certifications are
necessary.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
H. Modifications to Auction Application
1. Only Minor Modifications Allowed
84. After the initial application filing
deadline, an applicant will be permitted
to make only minor changes to its
application consistent with the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order.
Examples of minor changes include the
deletion or addition of authorized
bidders (to a maximum of three), and
the revision of addresses and telephone
numbers of the applicant, its
responsible party, and its contact
person. Major modification to an
auction application (e.g., change in toll
free number selections, change in the
party on whose behalf the applicant will
be bidding, certain changes in
ownership that would constitute an
assignment or transfer of control of the
applicant, change in applicant’s legal
classification that results in a change in
control, or change in the required
certifications) will not be permitted after
the initial auction application filing
deadline. If an amendment reporting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
changes is a ‘‘major amendment,’’ the
major amendment will not be accepted
and may result in the dismissal of the
application.
2. Duty To Maintain Accuracy and
Completeness of Auction Application
85. The Commission adopts a
procedure, consistent with its spectrum
auctions, requiring each applicant in the
833 Auction to maintain the accuracy
and completeness of information
furnished in its pending auction
application. For purposes maintaining
the accuracy of the information in an
auction application and associated
attachments, the application remains
pending until the release of a public
notice announcing the winning bidders.
833 Auction applicants remain subject
to the prohibition on certain
communications until the post-auction
deadline for making final payments
(with a late fee) on winning bids. Also,
consistent with the requirements for
Commission spectrum auctions, an
applicant for the 833 Auction must
furnish additional or corrected
information to Somos within five
business days after a significant
occurrence, or amend its auction
application no more than five business
days after the applicant becomes aware
of the need for the amendment. An
applicant is obligated to amend its
pending application(s) even if a
reported change may result in the
dismissal of the application because it is
subsequently determined to be a major
modification.
86. An applicant’s ability to modify
its auction application in the Somos
Auction System may be limited at
certain times—e.g., between the closing
of the initial filing window and the
opening of the application resubmission
filing window and between the closing
of the resubmission filing window and
the release of the public notice
announcing the qualified bidders.
During these periods, an applicant may
be able to view its submitted
application, but will be unable to make
changes. If an applicant needs to make
other permissible minor changes to its
auction application at any time other
than during the resubmission filing
window, it must submit a letter briefly
summarizing the changes to its auction
application via email to auctionhelp@
somos.com. The email summarizing the
changes must include a subject line
referring to the 833 Auction and the
name of the applicant, for example, ‘‘Re:
Changes to 833 Auction Application of
XYZ Corp.’’ Any attachments to the
email must be formatted as Adobe®
Acrobat® (PDF) or Microsoft® Word
documents. An applicant that submits
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50777
its changes in this manner must
subsequently modify, certify, and
submit its auction application(s)
electronically in the Somos Auction
System once it is available to applicants.
87. As with filing the auction
application, any amendment(s) to the
application and related statements of
fact must be certified by an authorized
representative of the applicant with
authority to bind the applicant.
Applicants should note that submission
of any such amendment or related
statement of fact constitutes a
representation by the person certifying
that he or she is an authorized
representative with such authority and
that the contents of the amendment or
statement of fact are true and correct.
88. Questions about amendments to
the auction application should be
directed to Somos at auctionhelp@
somos.com or (844) 439–7666.
IV. Preparing for Bidding in the 833
Auction
A. Due Diligence
89. Each applicant has the sole
responsibility for investigating and
evaluating all technical and marketplace
factors that may have a bearing on the
value of the toll free numbers that it is
seeking in the 833 Auction. The
Commission makes no representations
or warranties about the use of the toll
free numbers. Each applicant should be
aware that the 833 Auction represents
an opportunity to receive the right to
use certain toll free numbers and that
the Commission’s statutory authority to
add, modify, and eliminate rules
governing numbering applies equally to
all toll free numbers, whether acquired
through the competitive bidding process
or otherwise. In addition, the 833
Auction does not constitute an
endorsement by the Commission of any
particular service, technology, or
product, nor does a right to use the toll
free numbers constitute a guarantee of
business success.
90. An applicant should perform its
due diligence research and analysis
before proceeding, as it would with any
new business venture. In particular, the
Commission strongly encourages each
potential applicant to review all
underlying Commission orders,
including the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order. Each potential
applicant should perform due diligence
to assure itself that, should it become a
winning bidder for the right to use one
or more 833 numbers offered in the
auction, it will be able to comply with
all financial, technical, and legal
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
50778
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
91. The Commission also strongly
encourages each applicant for the 833
Auction to continue to conduct its own
research throughout the auction in order
to determine the existence of pending or
future administrative or judicial
proceedings that might affect its
participation in the auction. Each
applicant is responsible for assessing
the likelihood of the various possible
outcomes and for considering the
potential impact on toll free numbers
available in the 833 Auction. The due
diligence considerations mentioned in
the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice do not constitute an exhaustive
list of steps that should be undertaken
prior to participating in the 833
Auction. The burden is on the potential
applicant to determine how much
research to undertake, depending upon
the specific facts and circumstances
related to its interests.
92. The Commission makes no
representations or guarantees regarding
the accuracy or completeness of
information in its databases or any
third-party databases, including, for
example, court docketing systems. To
the extent the databases may not
include all information deemed
necessary or desirable by an applicant,
it must obtain or verify such
information from independent sources
or assume the risk of any
incompleteness or inaccuracy in said
database.
93. Applicants are solely responsible
for identifying associated risks and for
investigating and evaluating the degree
to which such matters may affect their
ability to bid on, otherwise acquire, or
make use of toll free numbers available
in the 833 Auction. Each potential
applicant is responsible for undertaking
research to ensure that any rights to use
toll free numbers won in this auction
will be suitable for its business plans
and needs. Each potential applicant
must undertake its own assessment of
the relevance and importance of
information gathered as part of its due
diligence efforts.
B. Bidder Education
94. The Commission directs Somos to
provide detailed educational
information to would-be participants
before the opening of the auction
application filing window on October 7,
2019. Specifically, Somos must provide
educational materials on the pre-auction
processes in advance of the opening of
the application window, beginning with
the release of step-by-step instructions
for completing the auction application.
In addition, the Commission directs
Somos to provide an online tutorial
covering information on application
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
procedures (including pre-auction
preparation, completing auction
applications, and the application review
process) and bidding procedures. The
Commission further directs Somos to
provide educational materials on the
bidding process and an opportunity to
practice the bid upload process in
advance of the bidding.
C. Registration for Auction ID
95. As a first step in the 833 Auction
application process, an interested party
must acquire an ‘‘Auction ID’’ from
Somos, which will verify the potential
applicant’s identity. Any entity that
cannot be verified through the Somos
verification process, or is otherwise
unable to participate in the auction
directly, will have the option to
participate in the auction through a
RespOrg (i.e., the RespOrg will bid on
its behalf and will be responsible for
making final payment on any winning
bids). The Commission proposed this
registration process in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice and received no
comments on it. This registration
procedure is consistent with the need to
obtain an FCC Registration Number
(FRN) to apply for Commission
auctions. Therefore, the Commission
adopts the proposal and urges interested
parties to allow sufficient time prior to
the application deadline to register so
that, should any party encounter
difficulties in the registration process, it
would have time to make arrangements
to alternatively participate in the
auction through a RespOrg.
D. Auction Application
96. Once Somos verifies an interested
party’s identity and issues an ‘‘Auction
ID’’ to it, the entity must then submit an
auction application (FCC Form 833)
electronically via the Somos Auction
System. Applicants must follow the FCC
Form 833 instructions that Somos will
release before the application window
opens. While no application fee will be
required, the applicant must submit a
sufficient upfront payment to become a
qualified bidder.
97. The auction application will
become available with the opening of
the initial filing window at 12:00 noon
ET on October 7, 2019 and must be
submitted prior to 6:00 p.m. ET on
October 18, 2019. Late applications will
not be accepted. Applicants are strongly
encouraged to file early and are
responsible for allowing adequate time
for filing their applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E. Application Processing and Minor
Modifications
1. Public Notice of Applicant’s Initial
Application Status and Opportunity for
Minor Modifications
98. After the deadline for filing
auction applications, Somos will
process all timely submitted
applications to determine whether each
applicant has complied with the
application requirements and provided
all information concerning its
qualifications for bidding. After review
of all the auction applications, Somos
will issue a public notice with
applicants’ initial application status as
either complete or incomplete. The
public notice will include the deadline
for resubmitting corrected applications
and a paper copy will be sent to the
contact address listed in the auction
application for each applicant by
overnight delivery. In addition, each
applicant with an incomplete
application will be sent information on
the nature of the deficiencies in its
application, along with the name and
phone number of a Somos staff member
who can answer questions specific to
the application.
99. After the initial application filing
deadline on October 18, 2019,
applicants can make only minor
modifications to their applications.
Major modifications (e.g., change toll
free number selections, change in the
party on whose behalf the applicant will
be bidding, certain changes in
ownership that would constitute an
assignment or transfer of control of the
applicant, change in applicant’s legal
classification that results in a change in
control, or change in the required
certifications) will not be permitted.
After the deadline for resubmitting
corrected applications, an applicant will
have no further opportunity to cure any
deficiencies in its application or provide
any additional information that may
affect the ultimate determination of
whether and to what extent the
applicant is qualified to participate in
the 833 Auction.
100. Somos staff will communicate
only with an applicant’s contact person
or certifying official, as designated on
the auction application, unless the
applicant’s certifying official or contact
person notifies Somos staff in writing
that another representative is authorized
to speak on the applicant’s behalf.
Authorizations may be sent by email to
auctionhelp@somos.com.
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
2. Public Notice of Applicant’s Final
Application Status After Upfront
Payment Deadline
101. After Somos staff review
resubmitted applications, Somos will
release a public notice identifying
applicants that have become qualified
bidders for that auction. Qualified
bidders are those applicants with
submitted auctions applications that are
deemed timely filed and complete and
who provided a sufficient upfront
payment.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
F. Upfront Payments
1. Amount of Upfront Payment and
Bidding Eligibility
102. Each potential bidder must
provide an upfront payment in a
specified amount for the maximum
number of toll free numbers on which
it may wish to submit a bid in the 833
Auction. An upfront payment is a
refundable deposit made by each
auction applicant to establish its
eligibility to bid in the auction. Upfront
payments protect against frivolous or
insincere bidding and provide a source
of funds from which to collect payments
owed at the close of bidding.
103. In the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission
proposed that potential bidders provide
an upfront payment of $100 per number
because it wanted to encourage only
serious, qualified bidders, while at the
same time, not discourage participation
in the auction. The Commission
received no comments on the upfront
payment proposal. It concludes that the
proposed upfront payment requirement
and the proposed amount per toll free
number will achieve the Commission’s
stated goals, and therefore, adopts the
proposal. Moreover, since the 833
Auction will serve as an experiment in
using competitive bidding for assigning
toll free numbers, the values of the
auctioned numbers can help inform the
Commission’s decisions regarding
upfront payment amounts in any future
toll free number auctions.
104. The Commission reiterates that,
if a bidder’s winning bids total less than
its upfront payment, any remaining
amount will be refunded to the bidder,
minus any default payments that the
bidder may owe. Similarly, if a bidder
does not have any winning bids, it will
be reimbursed the entirety of its upfront
payment. Moreover, to become a
qualified bidder in the 833 Auction, in
addition to having a complete auction
application, an interested party must
submit a sufficient upfront payment.
Thus, at a minimum, an applicant must
submit $100 (i.e., enough to establish
eligibility to bid on at least one toll free
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
number). Failure to deliver a sufficient
upfront payment as instructed by the
applicable upfront payment deadline
will result in dismissal of the auction
application and disqualification from
participation in the auction.
2. Submitting an Upfront Payment
105. In order to be eligible to bid in
the 833 Auction, an applicant must
submit a sufficient upfront payment to
Somos before 6:00 p.m. ET on
November 27, 2019. Each applicant is
responsible for ensuring timely
submission of its upfront payment.
106. All payments must be made in
U.S. dollars.
107. The 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice proposed to require
upfront payments of more than $300 be
made via wire transfer. Specifically, the
Commission proposed that any upfront
payment in excess of $300 must be
made through a wire transfer to Somos
(or its payment designee), and any
amounts under this threshold (i.e., $300
or less) can be made using an alternative
payment collection process, such as
Automated Clearing House (ACH). The
Commission received no comments on
this proposal or the threshold amount.
It finds that the proposed approach will
ensure prompt and assured transfer of
funds for those who plan to bid on more
than three toll free numbers, while the
alternative payment process should
make it easier for individuals or small
entities that are interested in only a few
toll free numbers, and therefore adopts
its proposals. It also adopts the proposal
to exclude payments via check or credit
card, as such payment processes have
increased risks associated with them,
which would not be conducive to a
timely auction. Thus, the Commission
will require payment by wire transfer
for any amount in excess of $300 and
allow payment by ACH for $300 or less.
Regardless of its payment method, each
applicant is responsible for obtaining
confirmation from its financial
institution that its payment to Somos
was successful.
108. Wire Transfer Payment
Information. If an applicant is providing
its upfront payment by wire transfer, it
should coordinate with its financial
institution well ahead of the due date
and allow sufficient time for the transfer
to be initiated and completed prior to
the deadline. The Commission has
repeatedly cautioned auction
participants about the importance of
planning ahead to prepare for
unforeseen last-minute difficulties in
making payments by wire transfer. The
following information will be needed
for wire transfers:
ABA Routing Number: 021000021
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50779
Receiving Bank: JP Morgan Chase Bank,
270 Park Avenue, New York, NY
10017
Beneficiary: Somos, Inc., Two Tower
Center Boulevard, 20th Floor, East
Brunswick, NJ 08816
Account Number: 511665892
Originating Bank Information (OBI
field): (skip one space between each
information item)
‘‘833 AUCTIONPAY’’
Applicant Auction ID Number: (same as
FCC Form 833)
Payer Name: (use exact same entity or
individual name as used in FCC Form
833)
109. ACH Payment Information. If an
applicant is providing its upfront
payment by ACH, the following
information will be needed:
ABA Routing Number: 021000021
Receiving Bank: JP Morgan Chase Bank,
270 Park Avenue, New York, NY
10017
Beneficiary: Somos, Inc., Two Tower
Center Boulevard, 20th Floor, East
Brunswick, NJ 08816
Account Number: 511665892
G. Bidding via Somos Auction System
110. Bidders will be able to
participate in the 833 Auction over the
internet using the Somos Auction
System. Only qualified bidders are
permitted to bid.
111. The Commission and Somos
make no warranties whatsoever, and
shall not be deemed to have made any
warranties, with respect to the Somos
Auction System, including any implied
warranties of merchantability or fitness
for a particular purpose. In no event
shall the Commission, Somos, or any of
their officers, employees, or agents, be
liable for any damages whatsoever
(including, but not limited to, loss of
business profits, business interruption,
loss of use, revenue, or business
information, or any other direct,
indirect, or consequential damages)
arising out of or relating to the
existence, furnishing, functioning, or
use of the Somos Auction System.
Moreover, no obligation or liability will
arise out of the technical, programming,
or other advice or service provided by
Somos or the Commission in connection
with the Somos Auction System.
112. To the extent an issue arises with
the Somos Auction System itself, the
Commission directs Somos to take all
appropriate measures to resolve such
issues quickly and equitably. Should an
issue arise that is outside the Somos
Auction System or attributable to a
bidder, including, but not limited to, a
bidder’s hardware, software, or internet
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
50780
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
access problem that prevents the bidder
from submitting a bid prior to the end
of the bidding round, Somos (and the
Commission) shall have no obligation to
resolve or remediate such an issue on
behalf of the bidder. Similarly, if an
issue arises due to bidder error using the
Somos Auction System, Somos (and the
Commission) shall have no obligation to
resolve or remediate such an issue on
behalf of the bidder. Accordingly, after
the close of the bidding round, the
results of bid processing will not be
altered absent evidence of any failure in
the Somos Auction System.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
H. Fraud Alert
113. As is the case with many
business investment opportunities,
some unscrupulous entrepreneurs may
attempt to use the 833 Auction to
deceive and defraud unsuspecting
investors. Common warning signals of
fraud include the following:
• The first contact is a ‘‘cold call’’
from a telemarketer or is made in
response to an inquiry prompted by a
radio or television infomercial.
• The offering materials used to
invest in the venture appear to be
targeted at IRA funds, for example, by
including all documents and papers
needed for the transfer of funds
maintained in IRA accounts.
• The amount of investment is less
than $25,000.
• The sales representative makes
verbal representations that (a) the
Internal Revenue Service, Federal Trade
Commission (FTC), Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), FCC, or
other government agency has approved
the investment; (b) the investment is not
subject to state or Federal securities
laws; or (c) the investment will yield
unrealistically high short-term profits.
In addition, the offering materials often
include copies of actual FCC releases, or
quotes from FCC personnel, giving the
appearance of FCC knowledge or
approval of the solicitation.
114. Information about deceptive
telemarketing investment schemes is
available from the FCC as well as the
FTC and SEC. Additional sources of
information for potential bidders and
investors may be obtained from the
following sources:
• The FCC’s Consumer Call Center at
(888) 225–5322 or by visiting https://
www.fcc.gov/general/frauds-scamsand-alerts-guides
• the FTC at (877) FTC–HELP ((877)
382–4357) or by visiting https://
ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/
invest/inv03.shtm
• the SEC at (202) 942–7040 or by
visiting https://www.sec.gov/investor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
115. Complaints about specific
deceptive telemarketing investment
schemes should be directed to the FTC,
the SEC, or the National Fraud
Information Center at (202) 835–0618.
V. Bidding in the 833 Auction
A. Auction Design
116. The Commission decided in the
Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order that the 833 Auction will be
conducted as a single round, sealed-bid
auction. All numbers will be available
simultaneously for bidding during the
round, with the winning bid for each
number determined solely by bids for
that number, independent of the bids for
any other number. Moreover, the
Commission also chose to use a Vickrey
auction, in which the amount paid by
the winning bidder is determined by the
second-highest bid. Therefore, in the
833 Auction, the winning bidder for
each 833 number will be the bidder that
submits the highest bid and it will pay
the second-highest bid amount for that
number.
117. In the event that a toll free
number receives only one bid, the right
to use the toll free number will be
awarded to the bidder submitting the
sole bid and the bidder will not be
required to pay anything to acquire the
rights to the toll free number because
there was no second-highest bid. The
Commission proposed this procedure in
the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice
and received no comments on it.
Because it is consistent with using a
Vickrey auction, the Commission adopts
the proposed procedure for any number
in the 833 Auction that receives only
one bid. The fact that the winning
bidder in this scenario will not be
required to pay anything to acquire the
rights to the toll free number does not
relieve the obligation to pay any other
fees, including regulatory fees to the
Commission.
118. To provide for the possibility of
tied bids, the Commission directs
Somos to assign a pseudo-random
number to each bid for each toll free
number submitted to the 833 Auction.
In the event that a toll free number
receives two or more tied bids for the
highest amount, the winning bidder will
be the one with the highest pseudorandom number among the bidders that
submitted the tied highest bids. The
Commission proposed in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice using
the pseudo-random number to break
tied bids and received no comments on
it. It also received no comments on the
proposal that, in the case of tied bids,
the second highest bid amount to be
paid by the winning bidder would be
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the same amount as the winning’s
placed bid (i.e., the tied bid amount).
The Commission finds these adopted
procedures consistent with the Vickrey
auction design and therefore adopts
them as proposed.
B. Auction Structure
1. Bidding Format and Period
119. The format for the 833 Auction
will consist of one bidding round. As
noted in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the single round will
occur on one day and the Commission
anticipates that the round will be open
for several hours. The Commission
received no comments on the bidding
format or bidding period. It directs
Somos, in consultation with the
Commission, to announce the actual
start and finish time of the bidding
round at least one week before the start
of the auction (i.e., by December 10,
2019). This approach should provide
certainty to the bidders, while providing
Somos with flexibility to adjust the
bidding depending on the number of
qualified bidders.
120. In the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission
recognized that, because this auction
could involve large numbers of bids and
the round will be open for several
hours, it does not expect that telephone
bidding will available in the 833
Auction. The Commission received no
comments on this procedure. In the
absence of objection and for ease of
auction efficiency, the Commission
directs Somos to conduct bidding via
the internet. While Somos should have
telephonic support available to help
bidders, the bids must be submitted
online. Therefore, bidders are strongly
encouraged to formulate back-up
contingencies to make sure they can
submit their bids online during the
bidding round.
2. Information Relating to Auction
Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
121. The Commission adopts the
proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice that, by public notice or
by announcement during the auction,
the Commission, or Somos in
consultation with the Commission, may
delay or suspend the auction in the
event of a natural disaster, technical
failures, administrative or weather
necessity, evidence of an auction
security breach or unlawful bidding
activity, or for any other reason that
affects the fair and efficient conduct of
competitive bidding. In such cases, the
Commission directs Somos to consult
with Commission staff about resuming,
rescheduling, or canceling the auction
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
in its entirety. If the bidding is delayed
or suspended, the Commission may
direct Somos to resume the auction
starting from the beginning of the
scheduled bidding round or for a shorter
period, or cancel the auction in its
entirety. The Commission will exercise
this authority solely at its discretion.
C. Bidding Procedures
1. Bidding Eligibility
122. To be eligible to bid in the 833
Auction, an applicant must submit a
sufficient and timely upfront payment.
The amount of the applicant’s upfront
payment will determine its bidding
eligibility—i.e., a qualified bidder may
submit only the number of bids
reflected in its upfront payment. To
help illustrate this point: If an applicant
were to select 50 numbers on its
application but submits an upfront
payment of only $1,000, it would be
able to place bids on only 10 numbers
(based on an upfront payment of $100
per number).
123. If a qualified bidder attempts to
place more bids than its bidding
eligibility allows, its entire bid
submission will be rejected and the
bidder will be given a warning and an
opportunity to fix its bids and resubmit. Neither Somos nor the
Commission, however, are responsible
for bids submitted in which the bidder
has exceeded its bidding eligibility.
Thus, bidders are strongly encouraged
submit their bids well before the end of
the single round to account for any
issues that may arise.
2. Bid Amounts
124. The Commission adopts the
proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to allow bids only in
whole dollar amounts. The Commission
directs Somos to provide more detailed
instructions on how qualified bidders
should submit bids and an opportunity
to practice the bid upload process.
Bidders are encouraged to become
familiar with the process well in
advance of the bidding round.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
3. Bid Removal
125. A bidder will have the ability to
remove any bid(s) that it has placed
before the end of the round. The
Commission directs Somos to provide
specific instructions on how a bidder
may do this. If a bidder removes any bid
that it has placed before the end of the
round, it will not be considered. Once
the single round of bidding closes, a
bidder may no longer remove, or
otherwise withdraw, any of its bids.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
VI. Post-Auction Procedures
A. Public Notice Announcing Winning
Bidders
126. In the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, the Commission
stated that, once the bidding concluded,
it would release a public notice
identifying the winning bidders and
establishing the deadline for making
final payment for winning bids. The
Commission also stated in the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order that
the public notice would also explain
how unsold inventory will be assigned
after the 833 Auction.
127. In the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission
included, among the various duties that
Somos, as the auctioneer, will perform,
the task of announcing the winning
bidders. Because Somos will be the
entity that will accept and process the
bids for the 833 Auction, the
Commission reiterates that Somos will
announce the winning bids.
128. As for any toll free number
offered in the 833 Auction that (i) was
not selected on any auction application,
(ii) did not receive a bid, or (iii) received
one or more bids but the winning bidder
defaulted, the Commission will issue a
decision on how it will assign such
numbers once it reviews the complete
results of the 833 Auction. Two
commenters advocate, in the case of
defaulted bids, that the Commission
offer the toll free number to the second
highest bidder. The Commission defers
until after the auction any decision on
how to handle any numbers offered in
the 833 Auction with no bid or where
the winning bidder defaulted. Once the
Commission has all the information
available on the 833 Auction
experiment, it can better assess how to
handle these numbers.
B. Final Payments
129. Each winning bidder must
submit the full payment for its winning
bid(s) within 10 business days following
release of the public notice announcing
the winning bidders. Similar to the final
payment procedures in Commission
spectrum auctions, the Commission will
allow a winning bidder to make its final
payment within five additional business
days after the applicable deadline,
provided it also pays a late fee of 5
percent of the winning bid. The
Commission also adopts the proposal in
the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice
that a winning bidder will declared in
default and subject to the applicable
default payment if it misses the final
payment deadline and also fails to remit
the required payment (plus the
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50781
applicable late fee) by the end of the late
payment period.
130. Like upfront payments, final
payments must be made in U.S. dollars
and will be submitted to Somos.
Moreover, the Commission adopts the
proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to require final payments
in excess of $300 to be made through a
wire transfer to Somos (or its payment
designee) and any amounts under this
threshold (i.e., $300 or less) can be made
using ACH. Winning bidders can also
use a wire transfer to submit final
payments of $300 or less, but also have
the option to use ACH. As with allowing
ACH for upfront payments below a
certain threshold, this alternative
payment process should make it easier
for individuals or small entities that are
the winning bidders for only a few toll
free numbers, while ensuring prompt
and assured payment of funds for those
who had winning bids that exceed the
$300 threshold. Moreover, as noted in
the 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice, the Commission proposed to
specifically exclude payments via check
or credit card, as such payment
processes have increased risks
associated with them, which may not be
conducive to a timely post-auction
process. For these reasons, the
Commission adopts the proposal and
only allows winning bidders to use ACH
as an alternative to wire transfers for
their final payments.
C. Refunds
131. The Commission directs Somos
to return any refunds of upfront
payments (minus any final payments
and any default payments) within 10
business days after the late final
payment deadline (i.e., within 25
business days of the public notice
announcing winning bidders). All
refunds of upfront payment balances
will be returned to the payer of record
unless the payer submits written
authorization to Somos instructing
otherwise.
D. Auction Default Payments
132. If a winning bidder fails to make
full payment on its bid or otherwise
defaults for any reason, it will be subject
to a default payment of 35 percent of the
defaulted bid. In the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order, the
Commission stated that it expected that
the procedures for handling defaults be
modeled on those used in the
Commission’s spectrum auctions, but
would defer the decision until the preauction process. In the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice, the
Commission proposed basing the
default payment for the 833 Auction
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
50782
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
only on a percentage of the defaulted
amount, since the Commission has not
yet decided if there will be a subsequent
auction of toll free numbers.
Specifically, the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice proposed a default
payment of 35 percent of the defaulted
bid, noting that the default percentage is
higher than in most of Commission
spectrum auctions to compensate for the
absence of a deficiency portion of the
default payment. The Commission
received no comments on the proposed
default procedures or percentage.
Because the proposed procedure should
sufficiently discourage insincere
bidding and default, the Commission
adopts both the proposed default
procedure and default percentage.
Moreover, if a default involves gross
misconduct, misrepresentation, or bad
faith by an applicant, the Commission
may declare the applicant and its
principals ineligible to bid in future
auctions and may take any other action
that it deems necessary, including
forfeiture of their upfront payment and
institution of proceedings to revoke any
existing FCC authorizations held by the
applicant.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
E. Reserving Toll Free Numbers/
Declaring a RespOrg
133. Any potential subscriber that
directly participates in the 833 Auction
and is a winning bidder must work with
a RespOrg after the auction to reserve a
number in the Toll Free Database in
accordance with § 52.101 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission
adopts the proposal in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice to require such
declaration within 15 business days
after the public notice announcing the
winning bidders. If a winning bidder
experiences problems working with
RespOrgs such that it would be unable
through no fault of its own to meet this
deadline, it could report the problems to
Somos, which will hold the number
while these issues are resolved, and
request waiver of the 15 business day
deadline, consistent with the
Commission’s existing waiver standard.
F. Secondary Market Considerations
134. The secondary market, allowing
the sale of numbers assigned during the
833 Auction, is a key component of the
auction and the Commission’s overall
toll free assignment modernization
efforts. As the Commission explained in
the Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order, a secondary market ‘‘promotes
the efficient operation of an auction’’
and, consistent with its goal of
promoting a market-based approach to
toll free number assignment, helps
ensure that numbers are assigned to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
those parties who can most efficiently
use them. The Commission thus adopts
procedures to allow for a secondary
market for those 833 toll free numbers
assigned via competitive bidding.
135. To evaluate the operation of this
new secondary market, and consistent
with the requirement established in the
Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order, the Commission directs Somos to
collect and maintain information on the
parties involved in the secondary
market transactions and make that
information available to the
Commission. Based on the proposal in
the 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice, and the comments filed in the
record, the Commission determines that
RespOrgs must submit the information
specified below about the parties
involved in post-auction secondary
market transactions involving their
subscribers to Somos within 60 days of
the RespOrg’s actual knowledge of the
transaction. This requirement will be
included in Somos’s tariff.
136. As an initial matter, the
Commission permits parties to acquire
and transfer the rights to use all
numbers that were assigned via the 833
Auction. Two commenters argue that
only 833 numbers that receive multiple
bids at auction should be able to be
bought and sold in the secondary
market. Only one commenter explains
the rationale for this argument:
CenturyLink claims that the
Commission should limit the secondary
market in this way because, by allowing
every auctioned number to be
transferred on the secondary market, the
Commission would ‘‘afford[ ] a special
status and related reporting
requirements to numbers based on
competitive interest that was fleeting
and not demonstrated at the auction.’’
But CenturyLink misunderstands why
the Commission chose to liberalize its
secondary market rules for numbers
assigned at auction in the first place.
The Commission created an exception
to the secondary market rules for
numbers assigned via competitive
bidding to ‘‘promote[ ] the efficient
operation of an auction’’ because it
‘‘allows subscribers to purchase or sell
numbers in response to the outcome of
the auction, and limits pre-auction costs
associated with estimating which—and
how many—numbers a bidder may
win.’’ The proposed limitation would
create uncertainty for prospective
bidders about whether they will be able
to transfer in the secondary market a
given number on which they wish to bid
and therefore it would frustrate this
purpose. The Commission finds no
reason to limit the ability of parties to
buy and sell numbers in the secondary
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
market beyond what was set forth in the
Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order.
137. Consistent with the proposal in
the 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice, the Commission directs Somos
to collect information regarding
secondary market transactions.
Specifically, the Commission directs
Somos to collect contact information of
both parties to a transaction including
(i) name, (ii) address, (iii) email address,
and (iv) phone number. This
information will allow the Commission
to fully evaluate the operation of the
secondary market and will promote
certainty and combat fraud in the
marketplace by keeping track of change
of title, both of which are important
components to this toll free number
auction experiment. The Commission
does not, however, require Somos to
collect information on the sale date and
price. After reviewing the record, the
Commission is persuaded by
commenters who argue that subscribers
may be hesitant to share sensitive
business information such as the sale
price, and it is not the Commission’s
intent with the reporting requirement to
impede the robust operation of the
secondary market. One commenter
contends that the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, as it relates to the data
collection and reporting obligation,
‘‘leaves some basic definitional
problems unresolved.’’ This obligation
extends to transactions which would
violate the Commission’s brokering rule
but are allowed by the exception for
numbers assigned via competitive
bidding. Put differently, covered
transactions are those which result in
the reassignment of an 833 number from
one subscriber to another, bypassing the
spare pool, which would have violated
the Commission’s prior first-come, firstserved rule.
138. The Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order established a
requirement that RespOrgs report the
required secondary market transaction
information to Somos. To implement
this requirement and incentivize
RespOrgs to provide this information
promptly, the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice proposed that RespOrgs
must submit this information to Somos
within 60 days of a transaction, against
the penalty of denying access to the Toll
Free Database until the information is
reported, which would be included in
the Somos tariff. The Commission
adopts this proposal, with the
modification based on the record that a
RespOrg has 60 days from the time it
has actual knowledge of the transaction
within which to report the required
information. The Commission further
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
adopts the proposal to allow a RespOrg
to withhold service from a subscriber
until it receives the necessary
information. Finally, the Commission
clarifies that, in the case of a transfer of
a number that is also accompanied by a
change of RespOrg, this obligation only
applies to the RespOrg providing service
to the purchasing subscriber.
139. The Commission is convinced by
RespOrg commenters that they may not
have reason to know of a secondary
market transaction by one of their
subscribers in all instances. To address
this concern, the Commission provides
RespOrgs 60 days from the date of
actual knowledge of a transaction to
report the information noted above
about the secondary market transaction,
rather than 60 days from the date of the
transaction itself. This change in when
the reporting obligation is triggered will
avoid a situation in which a RespOrg is
denied access to the Toll Free Database
for a transaction of which it is unaware.
The Commission nonetheless expects
RespOrgs to exercise due diligence in
monitoring secondary market
transactions involving their subscribers.
140. RespOrg commenters argue that
this requirement places too large of a
burden on RespOrgs because the penalty
for non-reporting is too harsh. The
Commission disagrees. The Commission
believes that the actual knowledge
standard adopted reasonably moderates
the penalty; the penalty is not triggered
until a RespOrg has actual knowledge of
a secondary market transaction for 60
days yet nonetheless fails to meet its
obligation to report the transaction. In
such a situation, the Commission finds
the penalty appropriate, given its
interest in tracking and analyzing the
secondary market in toll free numbers
during this experiment. The
Commission also concludes that the
actual knowledge standard negates the
need for Somos to provide RespOrgs a
30-day cure period prior to imposing the
penalty; the cure period was a response
to the concern that RespOrgs may not
know that a secondary market
transaction occurred, which is obviated
by the adoption of an actual knowledge
standard. Further, the penalty for nonreporting is removed when a RespOrg
provides Somos with the necessary
transaction information. The
Commission declines to go further and
place an affirmative obligation on
subscribers to report secondary market
transaction information to Somos, as
some commenters suggest, because such
an obligation was not contemplated in
the Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order. And because the Commission
does not find this obligation to be overly
burdensome for RespOrgs, it declines to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
adopt alternative approaches suggested
in the record.
VII. Procedural Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
141. This document implements the
information collections adopted in the
Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order and contains additional
information collection(s) subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13. The
Commission is currently seeking PRA
approval for information collections
related to the auction application
process and the secondary market. In
the present document, and its related
information collection, the Commission
requires the following information from
potential bidders: (1) Applicant contact
and other details; (2) direct ownership
interests; (3) indirect ownership
interests; (4) real parties in interests; (5)
FCC-regulated entities or applicants for
a FCC license in which the applicant,
any real party in interest, or any direct
interest holder of 10 percent or greater
owns 10 percent or more stock; (7)
whether the applicant is bidding on
behalf of other entities; (8) disclosure of
any allowable bidding arrangements; (9)
the toll free numbers on which the
applicant wishes to bid; and (10) any
other exhibits or documentation the
applicant deems necessary to apply to
bid in the auction. Without this
collected information, neither the
Commission nor Somos (on the
Commission’s behalf) can hold the 833
Auction, nor can potential bidders
participate in it.
142. In addition, with respect to post
auction secondary market transactions,
Somos will collect contact information
on the Commission’s behalf from parties
to secondary market transactions. This
information will allow the Commission
to fully evaluate the operation of the
secondary market, which is an
important component to this toll free
number auction experiment.
B. Congressional Review Act
143. The Commission will send a
copy of the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice, including the
Supplemental Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, in a report to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act.
C. Supplemental Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis
144. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was
incorporated in the Notice of Proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50783
Rulemaking in the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, 82 FR 47669, Oct.
13, 2017, pursuant to which the 833
Auction will be conducted. A
Supplemental Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (Supplemental
IRFA) was incorporated in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice. The
Commission sought written public
comments on the Supplemental IRFA.
No comments were filed addressing the
Supplemental IRFA. A Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) was also
incorporated in the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order. The
Supplemental Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (Supplemental
FRFA) in the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice supplements the FRFA to
reflect the actions taken in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice and
conforms to the RFA.
145. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Public Notice. The 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice implements
the auction procedures to be used by the
Commission and Somos for competitive
bidding in the 833 Auction for certain
toll free numbers in the 833 code. The
procedures adopted for the 833 Auction
seek to balance three goals: (1)
Promoting competition in the auction;
(2) avoiding undue burdens on the
applicants; and (3) assigning the 833 toll
free numbers as expeditiously as
possible. Moreover, the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice provides an
overview of the procedures, auction
dates and deadlines, requirements for
participants, terms and conditions
governing the 833 Auction and the postauction requirements and payment
processes.
146. To promote an efficient and fair
administration of the competitive
bidding process that will benefit all 833
Auction participants, including small
entities, the Commission adopts the
following procedures:
• Allow potential subscribers to
participate in the 833 Auction either
through a RespOrg that will bid on all
the numbers in which the subscriber is
interested in acquiring, or by submitting
its own application and bidding for all
the numbers in which it is interested;
• require each applicant in the 833
Auction to certify that (1) if it is bidding
on its own behalf, it is also not
participating in the auction through
another entity and/or, if it is bidding on
behalf of potential subscribers that it is
not aware that the potential
subscriber(s) are participating through
another applicant; and (2) it, or any
commonly-controlled entity, is not
submitting multiple applications in the
833 Auction, utilizing the Commission’s
definitions for control adopted for
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
50784
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
similar purposes in its spectrum
auctions;
• prohibit each applicant in the 833
Auction from cooperating or
collaborating with any other applicant
with respect to its own, or one
another’s, or any other competing
applicant’s bids or bidding strategies,
and will be prohibited from
communicating with any other
applicant in any manner the substance
of its own, or one another’s, or any other
competing applicant’s bids or bidding
strategies (including the post-auction
market for toll free numbers);
• prohibit certain agreements
between applicants (whether the
applicants are RespOrgs or potential
subscribers) in the 833 Auction, and
certain auction-related agreements
among RespOrgs even where only one of
the RespOrgs is an applicant in the 833
Auction;
• require any applicant RespOrg that
bids for a potential subscriber to acquire
a letter of authorization from the
potential subscriber;
• require applicants to first acquire an
‘‘Auction ID’’ from Somos, which will
verify the potential applicant’s identity,
and if any entity cannot be verified
through the Somos verification process,
it must then participate through a
RespOrg;
• require each applicant, on its
auction application, (1) identify each
number on which it wishes to be able
to bid and, for each number, the party
(either itself or another entity) for which
it is bidding, (2) provide the same level
of ownership disclosure required in
Commission auctions, (3) disclose any
auction-related agreement, and (4)
certify that it is not currently in default
or delinquent on a non-tax debt to the
Federal Government;
• for determining the winning bidder
on tied bids for a toll free number, use
a pseudorandom number assigned to
each bid, and for only one bid received
for a toll free number, assign the sole
bidder the number and require no
payment;
• conduct the 833 Auction using
procedures for limited information
disclosure;
• require potential bidders provide an
upfront payment of $100 per number,
and treat all funds that a RespOrg
submits as an upfront payment in the
auction (regardless of whether the funds
came from the RespOrg or a potential
subscriber for which the RespOrg is
bidding) as the upfront payment of the
RespOrg that will be used to offset the
final payment obligation for any
winning bids of the RespOrg;
• establish a default payment of 35
percent of the defaulted bid;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
• require full payment within 10
business days following release of the
public notice of the winning bids, or full
payment plus a 5 percent late fee,
within five additional business days;
• require any potential subscriber that
directly participates in the 833 Auction
and is a winning bidder to declare its
intent to work with a specific RespOrg
within 15 business days following
release of the public notice of winning
bids; and
• require Somos to collect additional
information on secondary markets and
require RespOrgs submit all required
data about post-auction secondary
market transactions within 60 days of
the RespOrg’s knowledge of a
transaction.
147. Summary of Significant Issues
Raised by Public Comments in Response
to Supplemental IRFA. There were no
comments filed that addressed the
procedures and policies proposed in the
Supplemental IRFA.
148. Response to Comments by the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. Pursuant to
the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010,
which amended the RFA, the
Commission is required to respond to
any comment filed by the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) and to provide a
detailed statement of any change made
to the proposed procedures as a result
of those comments. The Chief Counsel
did not file any comments in response
to the proposed procedures in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice.
149. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Procedures Will Apply. The RFA directs
agencies to provide a description of,
and, where feasible, an estimate of the
number of small entities that may be
affected by the procedures adopted
herein. The RFA generally defines the
term ‘‘small entity’’ as having the same
meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’
‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction.’’ In addition,
the term ‘‘small business’’ has the same
meaning as the term ‘‘small business
concern’’ under the Small Business Act.
A ‘‘small business concern’’ is one
which: (1) Is independently owned and
operated; (2) is not dominant in its field
of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the
SBA.’’
150. As noted above, FRFA was
incorporated in the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order. In
that analysis, the Commission described
in detail the small entities that might be
significantly affected. In the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice, the
Commission incorporates by reference
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the descriptions and estimates of the
number of small entities from the
previous FRFA in the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order in WC
Docket No. 17–192.
151. Description of Projected
Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small
Entities. The Commission designed the
auction application process itself to
minimize reporting and compliance
requirements for applicants, including
small business applicants. Parties
desiring to participate in the 833
Auction must file an application in
which they certify under penalty of
perjury as to their qualifications.
Eligibility to participate in bidding is
based on an applicant’s auction
application and certifications, as well as
its upfront payment. The Commission
decided in the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order that it will not
require applicants to submit a long-form
application after the conclusion of the
833 Auction, given the lack of need to
verify winning bidders’ qualifications in
this context and to limit the
administrative burden on bidders,
including small business entities.
152. The 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice provides instructions for
each 833 Auction applicant to maintain
the accuracy of its respective auction
application electronically using the
Somos Auction System and/or by direct
communication with Somos. More
specifically, small entities and other 833
Auction applicants will be qualified to
bid in the auction only if they comply
with the following: (1) Submission of an
auction application (FCC Form 833) that
is timely and is found to be
substantially complete; and (2) timely
submission of a sufficient upfront
payment. An applicant whose
application is found to contain
deficiencies will have a limited
opportunity during a resubmission
window to bring its application into
compliance with procedures set forth in
the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice.
153. In the second phase of the
process, there are additional compliance
requirements for winning bidders. As
with other winning bidders, any small
entity that is a winning bidder will be
required to submit the full payment for
its winning bid(s) within 10 business
days following release of the public
notice announcing the winning bidders,
or within 15 business days following
release of the public notice announcing
the winning bidders provided it also
pays a late fee of 5 percent of the
winning bid.
154. Steps Taken to Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Entities, and Significant Alternatives
Considered. The RFA requires an
agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business, alternatives
that it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): ‘‘(1) the establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements
under the rule for such small entities;
(3) the use of performance rather than
design standards; and (4) an exemption
from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for such small entities.’’
155. The Commission believes that
the steps described below to facilitate
participation in 833 Auction will result
in both operational and administrative
cost savings for small entities and other
auction participants. For example,
assigning toll free numbers through
competitive bidding will benefit smaller
entities rather than the prior first-come
first-served basis which favored larger,
more sophisticated entities that had
invested in obtaining enhanced
connectivity to the Toll Free Database.
Moreover, the Commission also elected
to allow potential subscribers, many of
which are smaller entities, the choice
between participating directly in the
auction or indirectly through a RespOrg.
In addition, the Commission created an
alternative payment mechanism that
will be available for both upfront and
final payments, in which applicants can
submit payments via ACH instead of
wire transfer if the payments are below
a $300 threshold. The Commission
believes such measures will benefit
small entities, who may be interested in
only acquiring one or perhaps a few toll
free numbers.
156. The procedures adopted in the
833 Auction Procedures Public Notice to
facilitate participation in the 833
Auction will result in both operational
and administrative cost savings for
small entities and other auction
participants. In light of the numerous
resources that will be available from the
Commission and Somos at no cost, the
processes and procedures adopted in
the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice should result in minimal
economic impact on small entities. For
example, prior to the auction, small
entities and other auction participants
may seek clarification of or guidance on
complying with application procedures,
reporting requirements, and the bidding
system. Small entities as well as other
auction participants will be able to avail
themselves of (1) a web-based,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
interactive online tutorial to familiarize
themselves with auction procedures,
filing requirements, bidding procedures,
and other matters related to the 833
Auction and (2) a telephone hotline to
assist with issues such as access to or
navigation within the auction
application system. The Commission
and Somos also make copies of
Commission decisions available to the
public without charge, providing a lowcost mechanism for small businesses to
conduct research prior to and
throughout the auction. In addition,
Somos will post public notices on its
website, making this information easily
accessible and without charge to benefit
all 833 Auction applicants, including
small businesses. These steps are made
available to facilitate participation in
the 833 Auction by all eligible bidders
and may result in significant cost
savings for small business entities who
utilize these alternatives. Moreover, the
adoption of bidding procedures in
advance of the auctions is designed to
ensure that the 833 Auction will be
administered predictably and fairly for
all participants, including small
businesses.
157. The Commission will send a
copy of the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice, including the
Supplemental FRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA. A
copy of the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice (or summary thereof) will
also be published in the Federal
Register.
50785
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement sections of the
National Defense Authorization Acts for
Fiscal Years 2017 and 2018 that
establish limitations and prohibitions
on the use of the lowest price
technically acceptable source selection
process.
DATES: Effective October 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 83 FR 62550 on
December 4, 2018, to implement the
limitations and prohibitions on use of
the lowest price technically acceptable
(LPTA) source selection process
provided in sections 813, 814, and 892
of the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017
(Pub. L. 114–328) and sections 822, 832,
882, and 1002 of the NDAA for FY 2018
(Pub. L. 115–91). Sixteen respondents
submitted public comments in response
to the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DoD reviewed the public comments in
the development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments is provided
as follows:
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
A. Significant Changes as a Result of
Public Comments
No changes from the proposed rule
are made in the final rule as a result of
the public comments received.
[FR Doc. 2019–20526 Filed 9–25–19; 8:45 am]
B. Analysis of Public Comments
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
1. Support for the Rule
Comment: Several respondents
express support for the rule.
Response: DoD acknowledges support
for the rule.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 208, 212, 213, 215, 216,
217, 234, and 237
[Docket DARS–2018–0055]
RIN 0750–AJ74
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Restrictions
on Use of Lowest Price Technically
Acceptable Source Selection Process
(DFARS Case 2018–D010)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. General Comments
Comment: A respondent expresses
concern that the rule will be interpreted
as a complete prohibition on the use of
the LPTA source selection process. The
respondent recommends revising the
rule to clarify that use of the process is
acceptable and expand on the
circumstances in which it is or is not
appropriate for use in acquisitions.
Response: It is not the intent of the
rule to prohibit the use of the LPTA
source selection process. The LPTA
source selection process is a valuable
part of the best value continuum and an
acceptable and appropriate source
selection approach for many
acquisitions. Instead, the intent of the
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50767-50785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20526]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 52
[AU Docket No. 19-101; WC Docket No. 17-192; CC Docket No. 95-155; FCC
19-75]
Auction of Toll Free Numbers in the 833 Code; Notice and Filing
Requirements, Upfront Payments, and Other Procedures for the 833
Auction; Bidding Scheduled To Occur on December 17, 2019
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final action; requirements and procedures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document summarizes procedures for the upcoming auction
of certain toll free numbers in the 833 code (833 Auction). The 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice summarized here is intended to
familiarize applicants with the procedures and other requirements
governing participation in the 833 Auction and provides overview of the
post-auction payment and toll free number reservation processes and
secondary market transaction disclosures.
DATES: Application to participate in the 833 Auction must be submitted
prior to 6:00 p.m. ET on October 18, 2019. Upfront payments for the 833
Auction must be received by 6:00 p.m. ET on November 27, 2019. Bidding
in Auction 103 is scheduled to occur on December 17, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For auction legal questions, Scott
Mackoul in the Auctions Division of the Office of Economics and
Analytics at (202) 418-0660. For toll free number questions, Matthew
Collins in the Wireline Competition Bureau's Competition Policy
Division at (202) 418-7141.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Public Notice (833
Auction Procedures Public Notice), AU Docket No. 19-101; WC Docket No.
17-192; CC Docket No. 95-155, FCC 19-75, adopted on August 1, 2019 and
released on August 2, 2019. The complete text of the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice is available for public inspection and copying
from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) Monday through Thursday
or from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference
Information Center, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC
20554. The complete text is also available on the Commission's website
at https://www.fcc.gov/wireline-competition/competition-policy-division/numbering-resources/833-toll-free-number-auction or by using
the search function for AU Docket No. 19-101, WC Docket No. 17-192, or
CC Docket No. 95-155 on the Commission's ECFS web page at www.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Alternative formats are available to persons with disabilities
by sending an email to [email protected] or by calling the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432
(TTY).
I. General Information
A. Introduction
1. With the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice, the Commission
establishes procedures for the upcoming auction of certain toll free
numbers in the 833 code (833 Auction). The 833 Auction, which will
serve as an experiment in using competitive bidding as a way to assign
toll free numbers, will make available 17,638 numbers in the 833 code.
Bidding in the 833 Auction will occur on December 17, 2019. The 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice provides details regarding the
procedures, terms, and conditions, as well as dates and deadlines,
governing participation in the 833 Auction, and an overview of post-
auction payments and requirements, including disclosure requirements
for post-auction secondary market transactions.
B. Background and Relevant Authority
2. In 2018, the Commission modified its toll free assignment rule
in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, 83 FR 53377, October
23, 2018, to provide greater flexibility and permit alternative
approaches to assigning numbers. Specifically, the Commission added
competitive bidding as a method to assign toll free numbers and, as an
experiment in using this approach, established the 833 Auction to
assign numbers that were requested by two or more Responsible
Organizations (``RespOrgs'') during the 833 pre-code opening process.
3. The Commission set out the general framework for the 833 Auction
in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order and designated Somos,
Inc., the Toll Free Numbering Administrator, as the auctioneer. The
Commission opened participation in the 833 Auction to not only RespOrgs
but also potential subscribers who may wish to participate directly.
The Commission also called for a pre-bidding process during which it
would seek comment on detailed auction procedures, as is typical in
Commission auctions.
4. In May 2019, the Commission initiated the pre-bidding process by
[[Page 50768]]
releasing a public notice seeking comment on auction procedures to be
used in the 833 Auction. Seven parties submitted filings in response to
the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, 84 FR 24424, May 28, 2019.
5. Section 251(e)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
(the Act), empowers the Commission to ensure that toll free numbers are
allocated in an equitable and orderly manner that serves the public
interest. Pursuant to this statutory mandate, the Commission has the
authority to set policy with respect to all facets of numbering
administration in the United States, and must do so in an efficient,
fair, and orderly manner. As in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order, the actions the Commission takes in the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice are designed to meet the statutory requirement that
numbers be made ``available on an equitable basis,'' by establishing
auction and secondary market procedures that are efficient, orderly,
and fair.
6. In addition to the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order,
other Commission decisions and rules provide additional information
useful to any party interested in participating in the 833 Auction. For
example, many of the application and bidding requirements set forth in
the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice are based on the Commission's
general competitive bidding rules. Thus, prospective applicants should
familiarize themselves with those rules, including recent amendments
and clarifications, as well as Commission decisions in proceedings
regarding competitive bidding procedures and application requirements.
7. Moreover, as part of their due diligence responsibilities,
applicants must be thoroughly familiar with the procedures, terms, and
conditions contained in 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice and any
future public notices that may be released in the 833 Auction
proceeding (AU Docket No. 19-101, WC Docket No. 17-192, CC Docket No.
95-155). The terms contained in the Commission's rules, relevant
orders, and public notices are not negotiable. The Commission may amend
or supplement the information contained in its public notices at any
time and will issue public notices to convey new or supplemental
information to applicants. It is the responsibility of all applicants
to remain current with all Commission rules and with all public notices
pertaining to the 833 Auction. Copies of most auctions-related
Commission documents, including public notices, can be retrieved at
www.fcc.gov/auctions, and copies of documents related to the 833
Auction can be retrieved at https://www.fcc.gov/wireline-competition/competition-policy-division/numbering-resources/833-auction.
Additionally, documents are available through Somos at https://auction.somos.com/ and at the Commission's headquarters, located at 445
12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554, during normal business hours.
C. Toll Free Numbers Offered in 833 Auction
8. In the 833 pre-code opening process, the Commission's Wireline
Competition Bureau authorized RespOrgs to identify up to 2,000 desired
numbers in the 833 code and submit a request for those numbers to
Somos. Somos identified 17,638 toll free numbers as requested by two or
more RespOrgs and placed those numbers in unavailable status. In the
Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, the Commission announced that
the rights to use these 17,638 toll free numbers in the 833 code would
be offered in the 833 Auction.
9. The Commission, in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order,
provided one exception to making these numbers available in the 833
Auction by allowing government entities and non-profit health and
safety organizations to file petitions to set aside numbers from the
auction for use for public health and safety purposes. On April 16,
2019, the Wireline Competition Bureau released a Public Notice seeking
petitions to set aside toll free numbers pursuant to this exception. No
petitions were submitted. Consequently, all 17,638 numbers previously
identified as having multiple requests will be offered in the 833
Auction. 833 Auction applicants must select the toll free numbers (from
the available list) for which they may bid on their auction
applications. If a particular available toll free number is not
selected on any auction application, it will not be available in the
auction. A complete list of these 17,638 numbers is available in
electronic format only at https://auction.somos.com/.
D. Auction Specifics
1. Auctioneer
10. In the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, the Commission
designated Somos as the auctioneer for the 833 Auction. As such, Somos
will be required to implement the procedures established in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice to conduct the auction, including:
Accepting applications to participate in the bidding (auction
applications); reviewing the applications for sufficiency; accepting
upfront payments; announcing which applicants are qualified to bid
(qualified bidders); accepting and processing the bids; announcing the
winning bidders; and accepting final payments. To accomplish these
tasks, Somos must provide an online system(s) for the 833 Auction that
will accept auction applications and bids (collectively Somos Auction
System) and Somos must provide procedures to accept both upfront and
final payments.
2. Auction Dates and Deadlines
11. The following dates and deadlines apply to the 833 Auction:
Auction Registration, Application, and Bidding Tutorials Available (via
internet)-No later than September 11, 2019
Auction Application (FCC Form 833) Filing Window Opens--October 7,
2019; 12:00 noon Eastern Time (ET)
Auction Application (FCC Form 833) Filing Window Deadline--October 18,
2019; 6:00 p.m. ET
Upfront Payments--November 27, 2019; 6:00 p.m. ET
Mock Auction--December 13, 2019
Bidding in the 833 Auction--December 17, 2019
3. Requirements for Participation
12. Those wishing to participate in the 833 Auction must:
Register for an Auction ID online through the Somos
Auction System;
Submit an auction application (FCC Form 833)
electronically through the Somos Auction System prior to 6:00 p.m. ET
on October 18, 2019, following filing procedures set forth in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice and any FCC Form 833 instructions
provided by Somos;
Submit a sufficient upfront payment to Somos by 6:00 p.m.
ET on November 27, 2019, following the procedures set forth in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice; and
Comply with all provisions outlined in the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice and applicable Commission rules and orders.
II. Implementation of 833 Auction Principles
13. In the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, the Commission
established certain principles to promote the transparency and
efficiency of the 833 Auction, and reduce the potential for conflicts
of interest and anticompetitive strategic behavior by participants. The
Commission sought comment in the 833 Auction Comment
[[Page 50769]]
Public Notice on specific procedures to implement these principles, and
in the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice, the Commission describes
how these principles will be implemented for the 833 Auction.
A. Participation Through Single Applicant and Application
14. The Commission adopts the proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to allow a potential subscriber to participate in the 833
Auction either (1) through a RespOrg that will bid on all the numbers
in which the subscriber is interested in acquiring, or (2) by
submitting its own application and bidding for all the numbers in which
it is interested. Thus, a potential subscriber cannot selectively
choose to be represented by a RespOrg to bid on its behalf for some
numbers and submit an application on its own to bid for other numbers.
15. In the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, the Commission
required that potential subscribers participate in the 833 Auction
through only a single auction applicant. In the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission proposed to implement this principle by
requiring that a potential subscriber may participate either through a
RespOrg that will bid on all the numbers that the subscriber is
interested in acquiring, or by submitting its own application and
bidding for all of the numbers in which it is interested. The
Commission received one comment on this issue. CenturyLink agrees with
the Commission's proposal, asserting that this ``bright line on
participation'' will help parties clarify their roles and promote the
integrity of the auction process. The Commission agrees with
CenturyLink's assessment and also believes the proposed application
procedure is consistent with the requirement that a potential
subscriber may participate through only a single auction applicant,
which is necessary to implement the prohibition on certain
communications, and with the decision to prohibit certain agreements
among auction applicants. Thus, the Commission adopts the application
procedure as proposed. If a potential subscriber is represented on
applications submitted by multiple RespOrgs, or files its own
application and is also represented on a RespOrg application, only one
of the applications on which it is represented may become qualified to
bid (i.e., any additional subscriber application(s) will be dismissed
and/or any additional RespOrg applications will not be found qualified
to bid for the potential subscriber's selected toll free number(s)).
16. In the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission
proposed two certifications in the auction application related to the
single applicant/application mandate. First, it proposed that the
auction application require that each applicant certify that (i) if it
is bidding on its own behalf, it is also not participating in the
auction through another entity, and/or (ii) if it is bidding on behalf
of potential subscriber(s), it is not aware that the potential
subscriber(s) are participating through another applicant. Second, the
Commission proposed requiring each applicant to certify that it, or any
commonly-controlled entity, is not submitting multiple applications in
the 833 Auction. The Commission received no comments on the proposed
certifications, and concludes that the certifications should aid in
enforcing the single applicant/application mandate. Thus, every
applicant must certify in its auction application that: (1) It is not
participating in the auction through another entity; (2) it is not
aware that any entity on whose behalf it is bidding is participating
through another applicant; and (3) it, or any commonly-controlled
entity, is not submitting multiple applications in the 833 Auction.
This language clarifies language proposed in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice in order to emphasize that the requirement to bid only
through a single applicant applies to every applicant, regardless of
whether it is bidding on its own behalf, or on behalf of another
entity. Moreover, by ``commonly-controlled entity,'' the Commission
means an entity that controls or is controlled by another party.
17. To identify commonly controlled entities in the 833 Auction,
the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice proposed to define a
``controlling interest'' as an individual or entity with positive or
negative de jure or de facto control of the applicant. As noted in the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission's part 1 rules state
that de jure control includes holding 50 percent or more of the voting
stock of a corporation or holding a general partnership interest in a
partnership. Ownership interests that are held indirectly by any party
through one or more intervening corporations may be determined by
successive multiplication of the ownership percentages for each link in
the vertical ownership chain and application of the relevant
attribution benchmark to the resulting product, except that if the
ownership percentage for an interest in any link in the chain meets or
exceeds 50 percent or represents actual control, it may be treated as
if it were a 100 percent interest. De facto control is determined on a
case-by-case basis. Examples of de facto control include constituting
or appointing 50 percent or more of the board of directors or
management committee; having authority to appoint, promote, demote, and
fire senior executives that control the day-to-day activities of the
entity; or playing an integral role in management decisions.
18. The 833 Auction Comment Public Notice also sought comment on a
presumption of control by spouses and immediate family members. In this
context ``immediate family member'' would mean father, mother, husband,
wife, son, daughter, brother, sister, father- or mother-in-law, son- or
daughter-in-law, brother- or sister-in-law, step-father or -mother,
step-brother or -sister, step-son or -daughter, half brother or sister.
The Commission proposed to place the burden on applicants to
sufficiently demonstrate that spouses or family members should not be
treated as having an identity of interest such that it creates common
control, and that where the presumption has not been adequately
rebutted, such spouses and family members will be subject to the
prohibition on submission of multiple auction applications by commonly
controlled entities.
19. One commenter, 1-800 Contacts, opposes the Commission's
proposal for defining the controlling interests of auction applicants,
arguing that many toll free number subscribers are commonly owned
``through large investment funds or corporate conglomerates,'' but
``have no day-to-day involvement with each other'' and therefore,
should be allowed to bid separately without having to develop a
coordinated bidding strategy. 1-800 Contacts advocates a more lenient
approach to controlling interests that would allow commonly owned (but
not commonly controlled) entities to participate separately in the
auction, specifically suggesting limiting control to ``de jure control
combined with actual day-to-day involvement in the operational
activities of the company.''
20. In the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, the Commission
stated that, while it would seek comment and decide how to define
parties with common controlling interests in the pre-auction process,
it anticipated using the Commission's definitions adopted for similar
purposes in its spectrum auctions (e.g., Sec. 1.2105(a)(4)(i) of the
Commission's rules). The Commission is unconvinced by the arguments of
1-800 Contacts, and
[[Page 50770]]
it adopts the controlling interest standard as proposed in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice--i.e., an individual or entity with
positive or negative de jure or de facto control. Because entities that
have control (either legal control or actual control) can behave in a
coordinated fashion, entities with common controlling interests should
not be able to participate through separate entities in the auction.
Moreover, such an approach is simpler and is consistent with the
Commission's approach for its spectrum auctions. As 1-800 Contacts
itself notes, requiring a determination of actual day-to-day
involvement (in addition to de jure control) would be subjective and
may be difficult for other auction participants and Somos to
definitively make. Further, unlike 1-800 Contacts, the Commission
believes that the experimental nature of this auction supports
consistency with the same standard that it uses in Commission auctions.
If it uses the same standard applied in Commission auctions,
participants in the 833 Auction can rely on any prior experience in
Commission auctions and on Commission precedent for guidance. Thus, the
Commission concludes that the controlling interest standard as proposed
in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice is preferable and therefore
adopts the proposal.
21. The Commission received no comments on the presumption of
control by spouses and immediate family members proposed in the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice. Therefore, it adopts the presumptions
(and definitions) set forth therein, and notes that if an applicant
wishes to rebut a presumption of control by a spouse or family member,
it should do so in a narrative explanation to its auction application.
22. Additionally, the Commission reiterates that any 833 Auction
applicants that have overlapping non-controlling interests must take
steps to prevent communicating bid information with each other.
Specifically, applicants with overlapping non-controlling interests
must certify they have established internal controls to preclude any
person acting on behalf of an applicant from possessing information
about the bids or bidding strategies of more than one applicant or
communicating such information to another person acting on behalf of
and possessing such information regarding another applicant. The
Commission will include such a certification in the auction
application.
B. Prohibition on Certain Communications and Compliance With Antitrust
Laws
23. Each applicant in the 833 Auction is prohibited from
cooperating or collaborating with any other applicant with respect to
its own, or one another's, or any other competing applicant's bids or
bidding strategies. Each applicant will be prohibited from
communicating, with any other applicant in any manner, the substance of
its own, or one another's, or any other competing applicant's bids or
bidding strategies (including with respect to the post-auction market
for toll free numbers). The Commission proposed this prohibition in the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice to reinforce existing antitrust laws,
facilitate detection of collusive conduct, and deter anticompetitive
behavior. The Commission received no comments on this proposal and
therefore, for the reasons stated in proposing it, the Commission
adopts the prohibition on certain communications for the 833 Auction.
1. Entities Subject to the Prohibition on Certain Communications
24. For purposes of the prohibition on certain communications, an
``applicant'' in the 833 Auction includes: (i) All controlling
interests in the entity submitting the auction application; (ii) all
holders of partnership and other ownership interests and any stock
interest amounting to 10 percent or more of the entity, or outstanding
stock, or outstanding voting stock of the entity submitting the auction
application; (iii) all officers and directors of that entity; and (iv)
any entity listed as a potential subscriber on whose behalf the entity
submitting the auction application will be bidding. As in the
Commission's spectrum auctions, in the case of a consortium, each
member of the consortium shall be considered to have a controlling
interest in the consortium. The Commission proposed in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice to define ``applicant'' broadly for the purposes
of the prohibition on certain communications, consistent with its
spectrum license and universal service support auctions. One commenter,
1-800 Contacts, supports the proposal, stating that applying the
prohibition broadly ``will help ensure the integrity of the auction
process.'' The Commission agrees with this assessment and adopts the
definition of applicant for purposes of the prohibition as proposed.
2. Prohibition Applies Until Final Payment With Late Fee Deadline
25. The prohibition on certain communications for the 833 Auction
will begin at the deadline for submitting auction applications (i.e.,
6:00 p.m. on October 18, 2019) and will end at the deadline for winning
bidders to submit their final payments with a late fee (i.e., 15
business days after the winning bidders are announced).
26. In the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission stated
that the prohibition on certain communications will begin at the
auction application deadline and will end ``at the post-auction
deadline for winning bidders to submit their final payments (which will
be announced by Somos after bidding concludes).'' The Commission
clarifies that, for ``final payment deadline,'' it will use the
deadline for winning bidders to submit their final payments with a late
fee. In the Commission's spectrum auctions, the prohibition on certain
communications runs until the down payment deadline, and in its
auctions for universal service support, the prohibition runs until the
post-auction deadline for winning bidders to submit applications for
support. For the 833 Auction, because winning bidders have neither a
down payment nor a post-auction application requirement, the most
analogous point is the final payment. However, the final payment in
this auction can be made up to an additional five business days after
the final payment deadline so long as it is submitted with a late fee.
Since the rationale to extend the prohibited communications period
until after bidding applies equally during the period in which an
applicant can submit the final payment with a late fee, the Commission
clarifies that the prohibition will run until that last deadline (i.e.,
15 business days after Somos announces the winning bidders).
3. Scope of the Prohibition on Certain Communications
27. As proposed in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, an
applicant will be prohibited from communicating, with any other
applicant in any manner, the substance of its own, or one another's, or
any other competing applicant's bids or bidding strategies (including
with respect to the post-auction market for toll free numbers). In
addition to express statements of bids and bidding strategies, the
prohibition against communicating ``in any manner'' includes public
disclosures as well as private communications and indirect or implicit
communications.
[[Page 50771]]
Consequently, an applicant must take care to determine whether its
auction-related communications may reach another applicant. The
Commission reminds applicants that they must determine whether their
communications with other parties are permissible once the prohibition
begins at the deadline for submitting auction applications, even before
the public notice identifying applicants is released.
28. Applicants should take special care in circumstances where
their officers, directors, and employees may receive information
directly or indirectly relating to any applicant's bids or bidding
strategies. Such information may be deemed to have been received by the
applicant under certain circumstances. For example, Commission staff
have found that where an individual serves as an officer and director
for two or more applicants, the bids and bidding strategies of one
applicant are presumed conveyed to the other applicant through the
shared officer, which creates an apparent violation of the rule.
29. As noted in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the
prohibition will not apply to all communications between or among
applicants; it will apply only to any communications conveying, in
whole or part, directly or indirectly, the applicant's or a competing
applicant's bids or bidding strategy (including with respect to the
post-auction market for toll free numbers). Thus, communications,
including business discussions and negotiations, unrelated to the toll
free numbers being offered in the 833 Auction and that do not convey
information about the numbers being auctioned or bidding strategies are
not prohibited. Moreover, not all auction-related information is
necessarily covered by the prohibition. For example, communicating
merely whether a party has or has not applied to participate in the 833
Auction should not violate the prohibition. In contrast, communicating
how a party will participate, including specific numbers or bid
amounts, and/or whether or not a party will place bids, would convey
bid or bidding strategies and therefore is prohibited.
30. Although the restriction does not prohibit business discussions
and negotiations among auction applicants that are not auction related,
each applicant must remain vigilant not to communicate, directly or
indirectly, information that affects, or could affect, bids or bidding
strategies. Certain discussions might touch upon subject matters that
could convey price or geographic information related to bidding
strategies. Such subject areas include, but are not limited to,
management, sales, local marketing agreements, and other transactional
agreements.
31. The Commission also cautions applicants that bids or bidding
strategies may be communicated outside of situations that involve one
party subject to the prohibition communicating privately and directly
with another such party. For example, the Commission has warned that
prohibited ``communications concerning bids and bidding strategies may
include communications regarding capital calls or requests for
additional funds in support of bids or bidding strategies to the extent
such communications convey information concerning the bids and bidding
strategies directly or indirectly.'' Moreover, the Commission
previously found a violation of the rule against prohibited
communications when an applicant used the Commission's bidding system
to disclose ``its bidding strategy in a manner that explicitly invited
other auction participants to cooperate and collaborate . . . in
specific markets'' and has placed auction participants on notice that
the use of its bidding system ``to disclose market information to
competitors will not be tolerated and will subject bidders to
sanctions.''
32. Likewise, when completing an auction application, each
applicant should avoid any statements or disclosures that may violate
the prohibition on certain communications, particularly in light of the
limited information procedures in effect for the 833 Auction.
Specifically, an applicant should avoid including any information in
its auction application that might convey information regarding its
toll free number selections, as applicable, such as referring to
certain toll free numbers in describing agreements, including any
information in application attachments that will be publicly available
that may otherwise disclose the applicant's toll free number
selections, or using applicant names that refer to numbers being
offered.
33. Applicants also should be mindful that communicating non-public
application or bidding information publicly or privately to another
applicant may violate the prohibition on certain communications even
though that information subsequently may be made public during later
periods of the application or bidding processes.
4. Communicating With Third Parties
34. The 833 Auction's prohibition on certain communications does
not prohibit an applicant from communicating bids or bidding strategies
to a third-party, such as a consultant or consulting firm, counsel, or
lender. The applicant should take appropriate steps, however, to ensure
that any third party it employs for advice pertaining to its bids or
bidding strategies does not become a conduit for prohibited
communications to other specified parties, as that would violate the
prohibition. For example, an applicant might require a third party,
such as a lender, to sign a non-disclosure agreement before the
applicant communicates any information regarding bids or bidding
strategy to the third party. Within third-party firms, separate
individual employees, such as attorneys or auction consultants, may
advise individual applicants on bids or bidding strategies, as long as
such firms implement firewalls and other compliance procedures that
prevent such individuals from communicating the bids or bidding
strategies of one applicant to other individuals representing separate
applicants. Although firewalls and/or other procedures should be used,
their existence is not an absolute defense to liability if a violation
has occurred.
35. As Commission staff have explained in the context of the
Broadcast Incentive Auction, in the case of an individual, the
objective precautionary measure of a firewall is not available. As a
result, an individual that is privy to bids or bidding information of
more than one applicant presents a greater risk of becoming a conduit
for a prohibited communication. The Commission will take the same
approach to interpreting the prohibited communications rule in the 833
Auction. Moreover, the Commission emphasizes that whether a prohibited
communication has taken place in a given case will depend on all the
facts pertaining to the case, including who possessed what information,
what information was conveyed to whom, and the course of bidding in the
auction.
36. For purposes of the 833 Auction, the Commission prohibits
separate applicants from designating the same individual on their
auction applications to serve as an authorized bidder. This prevents a
single individual with knowledge of the bidding strategies of more than
one applicant from conveying (even unintentionally) advice to any of
those applicants that is influenced by his or her knowledge about
another applicant's bids or bidding strategies in violation of the
prohibition on certain communications among auction applicants. A
violation of the
[[Page 50772]]
prohibition could also occur if the authorized bidders are different
individuals employed by the same organization (e.g., a law firm,
engineering firm, or consulting firm). In the latter case, at a
minimum, applicants should certify on their applications that
precautionary steps have been taken to prevent communications between
authorized bidders and that the applicant and its bidders will comply
with the prohibition on certain communications.
37. The Commission reminds potential applicants that they may
discuss the auction application or bids for specific toll free numbers
with the counsel, consultant, or expert of their choice before the
auction application deadline. Furthermore, the same third-party
individual could continue to give advice regarding the application
after the deadline, provided that no information pertaining to bids or
bidding strategies, including toll free numbers selected on the auction
application, is conveyed to that individual. To the extent potential
applicants can develop bidding instructions prior to the application
deadline that a third-party could implement without changes during
bidding, the third-party could follow such instructions for multiple
applicants provided that those applicants do not communicate with the
third-party during the prohibition period.
38. Applicants also should use caution in their dealings with other
parties, such as members of the press, financial analysts, or others
who might become conduits for the communication of prohibited bidding
information. For example, even though communicating that it has applied
to participate in the auction will not violate the prohibition, an
applicant's statement to the press of its intent not to place bids in
the auction could give rise to a finding of a prohibited communications
violation.
5. Certifications Related to the Prohibition on Certain Communications
39. When submitting its auction application, each applicant for the
833 Auction must certify its compliance with the prohibition on certain
communications. One commenter supports this certification. As in the
Commission's spectrum and universal service support auctions, the mere
filing of a certifying statement as part of an application will not
outweigh specific evidence that a prohibited communication has
occurred, nor will it preclude the initiation of an investigation when
warranted. Any applicant found to have violated the prohibition on
certain communications may be subject to sanctions, including among
other things, forfeiture and a prohibition from participating further
in the 833 Auction and in any future Commission auctions.
6. Duty To Report Prohibited Communications
40. Any applicant that makes or receives a communication that
appears to violate the prohibition on certain communications must
report such communication in writing to the Commission and Somos staff
immediately, and in no case later than five business days after the
communication occurs. The Commission proposed this requirement in the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice and received no comments on the
proposal. Each applicant's obligation to report any such communication
continues beyond the five-day period after the communication is made,
even if the report is not made within the five-day period.
7. Procedures for Reporting Prohibited Communications
41. A party reporting any information or communication that appears
to violate the prohibition on certain communications must take care to
ensure that any report does not itself violate the prohibition. To
minimize the risk of inadvertent dissemination of information in such
reports, parties reporting a potential prohibited communication must
submit a report directly to the following individuals: (1) Margaret W.
Wiener, Chief, Auctions Division, Office of Economics and Analytics, by
email to [email protected]; and (2) Joel Bernstein, Vice President,
Regulatory and Public Policy, Somos, by email to [email protected].
42. Given the potential competitive sensitivity of public
disclosure of information in such a report, a party seeking to report
such a prohibited communication should consider submitting its report
with a request that the report or portions of the submission be
withheld from public inspection by following the procedures specified
in Sec. 0.459 of the Commission's rules. Such parties should use the
contact information provided in the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice to consult with Somos and Commission staff about the procedures
for submitting such reports.
8. Additional FCC Auction Information Concerning the Prohibition on
Certain Communications
43. The Commission adopts its proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to rely on past precedent and guidance regarding its
rules on prohibited communications in connection with Commission
spectrum auctions. The Commission received no comments on this
proposal. A summary listing of documents addressing the application of
Sec. 1.2105(c) of the Commission's rules (the rule on prohibited
communications for Commission spectrum auctions) is available on the
Commission's auction web page at https://www.fcc.gov/summary-listing-documents-addressing-application-rule-prohibiting-certain-communications/.
9. Antitrust Laws
44. Regardless of compliance with the Commission's rules,
applicants remain subject to the antitrust laws, which are designed to
prevent anticompetitive behavior in the marketplace. Compliance with
the duty to report prohibited communications will not insulate a party
from enforcement of the antitrust laws. For instance, a violation of
the antitrust laws could arise out of actions taking place well before
any party submits an auction application. The Commission has cited a
number of examples of potentially anticompetitive actions that would be
prohibited under antitrust laws: for example, actual or potential
competitors may not agree to divide territories in order to minimize
competition, regardless of whether they split a market in which they
both do business, or whether they merely reserve one market for one and
another market for the other.
45. To the extent the Commission becomes aware of specific
allegations that suggest that violations of the Federal antitrust laws
may have occurred, the Commission may refer such allegations to the
United States Department of Justice for investigation. If an applicant
is found to have violated the antitrust laws or the Commission's rules
in connection with its participation in the competitive bidding
process, it may be subject to a forfeiture and may be prohibited from
participating further in the 833 Auction and in future auctions, among
other sanctions.
C. Restrictions on Agreements
46. To ensure the competitiveness of the 833 Auction, the
Commission proposed certain restrictions on agreements related to the
toll free
[[Page 50773]]
numbers being auctioned. The 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice
addresses the proposals raised in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice
to restrict agreements among auction applicants and agreements among
RespOrgs and to disclose agreements between RespOrgs and potential
subscribers.
1. Agreements Among Applicants
47. The Commission adopts its proposal in the Auction 833 Comment
Public Notice to prohibit certain agreements among applicants in the
833 Auction (regardless of whether the applicants are RespOrgs or
potential subscribers). The Commission received no comments on this
proposal. The prohibition applies to any agreements, arrangements, or
understandings of any kind to which the applicant (including any party
that controls or is controlled by the applicant) is a party relating to
the toll free numbers being auctioned that address or communicate
directly or indirectly bids (including specific prices), bidding
strategies (including the specific numbers on which to bid or not to
bid), or the post-auction market for toll free numbers.
48. The Commission also adopts its proposal to define ``applicant''
for these purposes broadly to include: All controlling interests in the
entity submitting the auction application; all holders of partnership
and other ownership interests and any stock interest amounting to 10
percent or more of the entity, or outstanding stock, or outstanding
voting stock of the entity submitting the auction application; all
officers and directors of that entity; and any entity listed as a
potential subscriber on whose behalf the entity submitting the auction
application will be bidding. Although the definition of ``applicant''
for these purposes includes any entity listed as a potential subscriber
on whose behalf the entity submitting the auction application will be
bidding, the restriction does not prohibit the agreement necessary to
provide authorization to the RespOrg applicant.
49. This prohibition will not apply to agreements unrelated to the
toll free numbers being offered in the 833 Auction. Business
discussions and negotiations that are unrelated to bidding in the 833
Auction and that do not convey information about the numbers being
auctioned or bidding strategies are not prohibited, and thus,
agreements reached by such communications unrelated to the toll free
numbers being auctioned will not be prohibited.
2. Agreements Among RespOrgs
50. The Commission prohibits auction-related agreements among
RespOrgs even where only one of the RespOrgs is an applicant in the 833
Auction. The Commission received no comments on the restriction
proposed in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice. Given RespOrgs'
position in the toll free number market, the Commission adopts its
proposal to prohibit any applicant RespOrg from having an agreement
related to the toll free numbers being offered in the 833 Auction with
a non-applicant RespOrg. Thus, any RespOrg interested in acquiring the
rights to any of the toll free numbers being auctioned must participate
in the auction directly.
51. Similar to the prohibition on agreements among applicants, the
prohibition among RespOrgs will not apply to agreements unrelated to
the toll free numbers being offered in the 833 Auction. Because
business discussions and negotiations that are unrelated to bidding in
the 833 Auction and that do not convey information about the numbers
being auctioned or bidding strategies are not prohibited, agreements
reached by such communications unrelated to the toll free numbers being
auctioned will not be prohibited.
52. In addition, the prohibition on agreements among RespOrgs would
not apply to RespOrgs that are commonly controlled. Commonly-controlled
entities are those in which the same individual or entity either
directly or indirectly holds a controlling interest (as determined by
positive or negative de jure or de facto control). When RespOrgs share
a common officer or director or control, the Commission presumes that
bids and bid strategies will be communicated. Moreover, the Commission
reiterates, since commonly controlled RespOrgs cannot submit multiple
applications, if they wish to apply for the 833 Auction, they will need
to choose one of the entities to be the applicant and disclose the
existence of the other commonly-controlled RespOrgs in the application.
3. Agreements Between RespOrgs and Potential Subscribers
53. Any applicant RespOrg that bids for a potential subscriber must
acquire a letter of authorization from the potential subscriber. In the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission recognized the unique
position of RespOrgs, in that they can participate in the auction both
on their own behalf and on behalf of other entities. Thus, the
Commission believes that the relationship between an applicant RespOrg
and a potential subscriber for which it is applying to bid should be
formally authorized and transparent so that it can be easily verified.
To that end, the Commission proposed to require any applicant RespOrg
that bids for a potential subscriber to acquire a letter of
authorization from the potential subscriber. No comments were received
on the proposal. Based on the need to verify the relationship, the
Commission will require a letter of authorization that clearly
identifies the parties (both the potential subscriber and RespOrg) and
toll free number(s) in which the RespOrg will bid for the potential
subscriber. That letter must be dated and signed by the potential
subscriber. Moreover, because an applicant RespOrg bidding on behalf of
a potential subscriber is ultimately responsible for complying with all
post-auction requirements, it is the responsibility of the applicant
RespOrg to ensure the authorization by the potential subscriber is
adequate (e.g., has been signed by a person with authority to bind the
entity).
54. The 833 Auction Comment Public Notice also sought comment on
whether to require any applicant RespOrg bidding on behalf of a
potential subscriber to provide the letter of authorization as part of
its auction application (e.g., by uploading it as an attachment) or to
allow the applicant RespOrg to certify that it is in possession of the
letter and be able to produce it to the Commission if requested. The
Commission received no comments on either option. Since the upload
process should not be burdensome and uploading the document should help
Somos verify the relationship, the Commission will require any
applicant RespOrg that is bidding on behalf of a potential subscriber
to upload the letter of authorization as part of its auction
application. The Commission directs Somos to withhold the public
disclosure of these attachments until after the bidding, since the
letters of authorization will contain specific information on toll free
numbers being sought by the potential subscriber.
D. Limited Information Procedures During the Auction Process
55. Consistent with the procedures in many recent Commission
auctions, the Commission adopts its proposal that Somos conduct the 833
Auction using procedures for limited information disclosure (sometimes
also referred to as anonymous bidding). The Commission received no
comments on its proposal to use limited information procedures.
[[Page 50774]]
Thus, the Commission directs Somos to withhold, until after the close
of bidding and announcement of auction results, the public release of
bidders' particular 833 number selections and any information that may
reveal the identities of bidders placing bids and taking other bidding-
related actions. More specifically, the following information will not
be made public until after bidding has closed: (1) The numbers that an
applicant selects for bidding in its auction application, (2) the
amount of any upfront payment made by or on behalf of an applicant for
the 833 Auction, (3) any applicant's bidding eligibility, and (4) any
other bidding-related information that might reveal the identity of the
bidder placing a bid or the amount of the bid.
56. Because the 833 Auction will be conducted using a single round
of bidding, the Commission does not anticipate that there will be the
same need for release of bidding-related actions during the auction
that there would be in a multiple-round auction. If such circumstances
were to arise prior to the release of non-public information and
auction results, however, the Commission directs Somos to avoid
releasing any information that may indicate the identity of any bidders
taking such actions.
57. Moreover, after receiving no comments on the proposal in the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice to make public bidders' number
selections, upfront payment amounts, bids, and any other bidding-
related actions and information after the close of bidding, the
Commission adopts the proposal. The Commission believes making this
information available to the public, after bidding is complete, will
increase auction transparency and allow the public generally to
evaluate the experiment in using competitive bidding as a toll free
number assignment method.
E. Responsibility for Winning Bid Payment
58. Any 833 Auction applicant, including a RespOrg participating on
behalf of one or more potential subscribers, assumes a binding
obligation to pay its full winning bid amount, and is responsible for
complying with all post-auction requirements, regardless of whether a
potential subscriber on whose behalf the RespOrg bid fulfills its
financial or contractual obligation to the RespOrg. While an applicant
RespOrg may seek reimbursement from the potential subscriber for which
it bid, the RespOrg--as the bidder in the auction--is ultimately
responsible for full payment of any winning bid.
III. Applying To Participate in the 833 Auction
A. General Information Regarding the Auction Application
59. Any party interested in obtaining an 833 number available
through the auction must submit an application (FCC Form 833) to become
qualified to bid in the 833 Auction. An application to participate in
the 833 Auction, referred to in the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice as an ``auction application,'' provides information that Somos,
as the auctioneer, will use to determine whether the applicant is
qualified to participate in the auction. Eligibility to participate in
the 833 Auction is based on an applicant's auction application,
including its certifications made under penalty of perjury, and on the
applicant's submission of a sufficient upfront payment for the auction.
60. A party seeking to participate in the 833 Auction must file an
FCC Form 833 electronically via the Somos Auction System prior to 6:00
p.m. ET on October 18, 2019, following the procedures prescribed in the
833 Auction Procedures Public Notice and any FCC Form 833 instructions
provided by Somos. The 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice describes
more fully the information disclosures and certifications required in
the auction application. An applicant that files an application to
participate in the 833 Auction will be subject to the prohibition on
certain communications, beginning at the deadline for filing auction
applications--6:00 p.m. ET on October 18, 2019. The prohibition will
end for applicants on the post-auction final payment (with late fee)
deadline. Each applicant remains subject to the prohibition until the
end of the prohibition period, regardless of whether or not it becomes
qualified to bid or actually submits any bids.
61. An applicant bears full responsibility for submitting an
accurate, complete, and timely auction application. Each applicant must
make a series of certifications under penalty of perjury on its FCC
Form 833 related to the information provided in its application and its
participation in the auction. If an applicant fails to make the
required certifications in its FCC Form 833 by the filing deadline, its
application will be deemed unacceptable for filing and cannot be
corrected after the filing deadline.
62. An applicant should note that submitting an FCC Form 833 (and
any amendments thereto) constitutes a representation by the certifying
official that he or she is an authorized representative of the
applicant with authority to bind the applicant, that he or she has read
the form's instructions and certifications, and that the contents of
the application, its certifications, and any attachments are true and
correct. Submitting a false certification in an application may result
in penalties, including monetary forfeitures, license forfeitures,
ineligibility to participate in future auctions, and/or criminal
prosecution.
63. Applicants are cautioned that because the required information
submitted in an FCC Form 833 bears on each applicant's qualifications,
requests for confidential treatment will not be routinely granted. The
Commission has held generally that it may publicly release confidential
business information where the party has put that information at issue
in a Commission proceeding or where the Commission has identified a
compelling public interest in disclosing the information.
64. A party may not submit more than one auction application for
the 833 Auction. Similarly, a party can participate in the 833 Auction
only through a single bidding entity; either it can participate
indirectly through a RespOrg or directly by submitting its own
application. As in Commission spectrum auctions, if a party submits
multiple auction applications, only one application may be the basis
for that party to become qualified to bid in the auction.
65. After the initial auction application filing deadline, Somos
staff will review all timely submitted applications for the 833 Auction
to determine whether each application complies with the application
requirements and whether it has provided all required information
concerning the applicant's qualifications for bidding. After this
review is completed, Somos, in its capacity as auctioneer, will release
a public notice identifying the applications as complete or incomplete,
and will establish an application resubmission filing window, during
which an applicant may make permissible minor modifications to its
application to address identified deficiencies. The public notice will
include the deadline for resubmitting modified applications. To become
a qualified bidder, an applicant must have a complete application
(i.e., have timely corrected any identified deficiencies) and make a
timely and sufficient upfront payment. After review of resubmitted
applications is complete,
[[Page 50775]]
Somos will issue a public notice identifying the applicants that are
qualified to bid. Somos should release this notice at least five
business days before the bidding (i.e., by December 10, 2019).
66. The 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice provides additional
details regarding certain information required to be submitted in the
FCC Form 833. In addition, an applicant should consult the Commission's
rules, the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, and any additional
releases specific to the 833 Auction (including instructions on
submitting a FCC Form 833 provided by Somos) to ensure that, in
addition to the materials described in the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice, all required information is included in its auction
application. To the extent the information in the 833 Auction
Procedures Public Notice does not address a potential applicant's
specific operating structure, or if the applicant needs additional
information or guidance concerning the following disclosure
requirements, the applicant should review the educational materials for
the 833 Auction and/or use the contact information provided in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice to consult with Somos and Commission
staff to better understand the information it must submit in its
auction application.
B. 833 Auction Number Selection
67. Each 833 Auction applicant must identify in its auction
application any toll free number (from the list of available 833
numbers) on which it may wish to place a bid during the auction.
Moreover, for each number it selects, the applicant must identify the
party (either itself or another party) for which it is bidding.
68. The 833 Auction Comment Public Notice proposed requiring
applicants to select the toll free numbers for which they are
interested in bidding and, for each number, identify the party for
which it is bidding to allow Somos to verify that a potential
subscriber is seeking to bid based on only one application and make it
clear to applicants that they can represent only one entity per number,
including itself. The Commission received no comments on this proposal.
Therefore, based for the reasons set forth in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice, the Commission adopts this application requirement.
69. The Commission also adopts its proposal to consider any change
made to the numbers selected on an application or the party for which
an applicant is bidding to be a major modification of the application,
which will result in a dismissal of the application. Finalizing the
list of potential toll free numbers and parties for which applicants
may be bidding provides certainty in the application review and auction
qualification process. Therefore, the Commission requires applicants to
select the toll free numbers and identify the party for which it is
bidding on its application by the application deadline. If qualified to
bid in the auction, the entity will not be obligated to place a bid on
each of the numbers selected in its application, but an entity will not
be able to bid on any numbers that it does not select in its
application. If a particular available toll free number is not selected
on any auction application, it will not be available in the auction.
70. Moreover, the Commission directs Somos to withhold from public
disclosure the 833 toll free numbers selected by an applicant on its
auction application until after the bidding is complete. The Commission
received no comments on its proposal in the 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice to make public the name of party (or parties) for which an
applicant is bidding once Somos announces which applications are
complete or incomplete. The Commission adopts the proposal because,
consistent with the practice in Commission spectrum auctions, it finds
that competition will be enhanced by withholding certain information,
such as toll free number selections, from other applicants, while still
providing bidders with information that will allow them to accurately
assess the legitimacy of their auction opponents.
C. Ownership Disclosure Requirements
71. Any party interested in participating in the 833 Auction must
provide, in its auction application, the same level of ownership
disclosure required in Commission spectrum auctions under Sec.
1.2112(a) of the Commission's rules. Thus, each applicant must
disclose: (1) The real party or parties in interest of the applicant or
of the application; (2) any direct interest holder of 10 percent or
greater; (3) any indirect interest holder of 10 percent or greater; and
(4) any FCC-regulated entity or applicant for an FCC license in which
the applicant, any real party in interest, or any direct interest
holder of 10 percent or greater, owns 10 percent or more stock, whether
voting or non-voting. An applicant must list all parties holding
indirect ownership interests in the applicant as determined by
successive multiplication of the ownership percentages for each link in
the vertical ownership chain that equals 10 percent or more of the
applicant, except that if the ownership percentage for an interest in
any link in the chain exceeds 50 percent or represents actual control,
it shall be treated and reported as if it were a 100 percent interest.
72. The 833 Auction Comment Public Notice proposed using the
ownership disclosure rule used in Commission spectrum auctions. One
commenter argued that the disclosure requirements of Sec. 1.2112(a)
are unnecessary for the 833 Auction. Specifically, 1-800 Contacts
argues that the 10 percent disclosure threshold for direct and indirect
interest holders may be relevant to commercial wireless service
auctions (because of spectrum aggregation limits) or broadcast auctions
(because of multiple ownership, cross ownership and foreign ownership),
but not toll free number auctions because toll free numbers have no
such limits. 1-800 Contacts therefore argues that the proposed
disclosure requirement is ``exceedingly burdensome, particularly on
prospective auction participants that may be held through complex
private investment funds.'' In lieu of such disclosure, 1-800 Contacts
proposes that auction applicants certify that they and their
attributable interest holders are in compliance with the Commission's
auction rules, including the prohibition on certain communications.
73. While 1-800 Contacts is correct that the ownership disclosure
requirements of Sec. 1.2112 aid in the Commission's enforcement of
certain restrictions, such as ownership limits, 1-800 Contacts fails to
account for the fact that the 10 percent reporting requirements provide
other benefits to the other auction participants. Responding to similar
arguments against ownership disclosure made in the Part 1 competitive
bidding proceeding, the Commission stated that the 10 percent reporting
requirement ``helps competing bidders accurately assess the legitimacy
of their auction opponents and . . . aids bidders by providing them
with information about their auction competitors and alerting them to
entities subject to [the Commission's] anti-collusion rules.'' Such
reasoning applies in the 833 Auction as well. As 1-800 Contacts itself
supports the broad application of the prohibition on certain
communications, other auction participants rely on the ownership
disclosure in auction applications to know with which parties they are
prohibited from communicating. Moreover, the Commission disagrees that
such disclosure is overly
[[Page 50776]]
burdensome. Auction applicants have provided such information in a
variety of Commission auctions for over 20 years, and such information
provides transparency regarding the identity of auction participants--
not only to the Commission, but also to other auction participants and
the public generally. Thus, the Commission adopts its proposal in the
833 Auction Comment Public Notice to require the same level of
ownership disclosure required in Sec. 1.2112(a) of the Commission's
rules.
D. Disclosure of Agreements and Bidding Arrangements
74. To the extent that an applicant may be a party to an auction-
related agreement, it must disclose the agreement on its auction
application. Specifically, the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice
proposed to require an applicant to provide in its auction application
a brief description of, and identify each party to, any partnerships,
joint ventures, consortia or agreements, arrangements, or
understandings of any kind relating to the toll free numbers being
auctioned, including any agreements that address or communicate
directly or indirectly bids (including specific prices), bidding
strategies (including the specific licenses on which to bid or not to
bid), or the post-auction market structure, to which the applicant, or
any party that controls or is controlled by the applicant, is a party.
For purposes of this disclosure, a controlling interest includes all
individuals or entities with positive or negative de jure or de facto
control of the applicant. The Commission received no comments on this
proposal. Because disclosure of these arrangements provides
transparency about the auction applicants and any parties with whom
they have entered into agreements regarding the toll free numbers being
offered in the auction, the Commission adopts this disclosure
requirement. Additionally, if an applicant in the 833 Auction is a
potential subscriber but is also bidding on behalf of another potential
subscriber, it would need to disclose the existence of such an
agreement. In such circumstances, the applicant would need to briefly
describe the agreement, but must not disclose the toll free number(s)
for which it is bidding on behalf of the other potential subscriber(s).
75. In connection with the agreement disclosure requirement, the
applicant must certify under penalty of perjury in its auction
application that it has described, and identified each party to, any
such agreements, arrangements, or understandings into which it has
entered. An applicant that enters into any agreement relating to the
toll free numbers being auctioned after the auction application
deadline is subject to the same disclosure obligations it would be for
agreements existing at the application deadline, and it must maintain
the accuracy and completeness of the information in its pending auction
application.
76. For purposes of making the required agreement disclosures on
the auction application, if parties agree in principle on all material
terms prior to the application filing deadline, the applicant must
provide a brief description of, and identify the other party or parties
to, the agreement, even if the agreement has not been reduced to
writing. However, if the parties have not agreed in principle by the
application filing deadline, the applicant should not describe, or
include the names of parties to, the discussions on its application.
77. Finally, the Commission sought comment in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice on the level of disclosure for auction-related
agreements, noting that in its spectrum auctions, an applicant must
disclose certain limited information about the agreements in their pre-
auction short-form applications (e.g., the parties to the agreement and
a brief summary of the agreements), while winning bidders often may be
required to provide more detailed information about the agreements in
their post-auction long-form applications. The Commission received no
comments on this issue. It concludes that, for the 833 Auction, it is
sufficient to require applicants to identify the parties and provide a
brief description of the agreement because it will provide enough
detail to understand the arrangement without being overly burdensome on
auction applicants. When identifying the parties to any agreement, and
providing a brief description of such, applicants should take care to
avoid providing any details that would indicate specific toll free
numbers.
E. Authorized Bidders
78. An applicant must designate at least one individual as an
authorized bidder, and no more than three, in its auction application.
In the Commission's spectrum auctions, the rules prohibit an individual
from serving as an authorized bidder for more than one auction
applicant. This restriction ensures that a single individual with
knowledge of the bidding strategies of more than one applicant cannot
become even an unwitting conduit of bidding information between those
applicants in violation of the Commission's prohibition on certain
communications among auction applicants. The Commission finds that a
similar restriction would be serve the integrity of the 833 Auction,
and accordingly, it prohibits an individual from serving as an
authorized bidder for more than one auction applicant in the 833
Auction.
F. Provisions Regarding Current Defaulters
79. The Commission adopts its proposal in the Auction 833 Comment
Public Notice to adhere to its practice in Commission spectrum auctions
regarding current defaults and delinquencies and to require each
applicant in the 833 Auction to certify that it is not currently in
default or delinquent on a non-tax debt to the Federal Government. The
Commission received no comments on the proposal and takes this step to
preserve the integrity of the auction process and to ensure that
bidders are capable of meeting their financial commitments. As is the
Commission's practice in spectrum auctions, an applicant will be
considered a ``current defaulter'' or ``current delinquent'' when it,
any of its affiliates, any of its controlling interests, or any of the
affiliates of its controlling interests, is in default on any payment
for any Commission construction permit or license (including a down
payment) or is delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal
agency.
80. Also consistent with Commission spectrum auctions, the
applicant's status as a current defaulter will be determined as of the
auction application deadline. After the deadline, an applicant can
dispute the status of the debt, but as noted in the 833 Auction Comment
Pubic Notice and consistent with the Commission's practice in spectrum
auctions, applicants will not be able to cure the default or
delinquency after the auction application deadline to participate in
the auction. Thus, prospective applicants should pay any delinquent
debts prior to the auction application deadline.
81. In addition to the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice,
applicants are encouraged to review previous guidance on default and
delinquency disclosure requirements in the context of the auction
application process. Parties are also encouraged to consult with the
Somos staff if they have any questions about default and delinquency
disclosure requirements.
82. Applicants are encouraged to check the Commission's Red Light
Display System for information
[[Page 50777]]
regarding debts currently owed to the Commission. To access the
Commission's Red Light Display System, go to: https://apps.fcc.gov/redlight/login.cfm. The Commission reminds each applicant, however,
that its Red Light Display System may not be determinative of an
auction applicant's ability to comply with the default and delinquency
disclosure requirements (e.g., an applicant may be delinquent on a non-
tax debt to another Federal agency). Thus, an auction applicant's lack
of current ``red light'' status is not necessarily determinative of its
eligibility to participate in the auction. The Commission strongly
encourages each applicant to carefully review all records and other
available Federal agency databases and information sources to determine
whether the applicant, or any of its affiliates, or any of its
controlling interests, or any of the affiliates of its controlling
interests, owes or was ever delinquent in the payment of non-tax debt
owed to any Federal agency.
G. Additional Disclosures and Certifications
83. In the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission sought
comment on whether there are other certifications that it should
consider requiring auction applicants to make in order to become
qualified to bid in the 833 Auction or any legal restrictions that may
be relevant. The Commission received no comments and therefore
concludes no further certifications are necessary.
H. Modifications to Auction Application
1. Only Minor Modifications Allowed
84. After the initial application filing deadline, an applicant
will be permitted to make only minor changes to its application
consistent with the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order. Examples
of minor changes include the deletion or addition of authorized bidders
(to a maximum of three), and the revision of addresses and telephone
numbers of the applicant, its responsible party, and its contact
person. Major modification to an auction application (e.g., change in
toll free number selections, change in the party on whose behalf the
applicant will be bidding, certain changes in ownership that would
constitute an assignment or transfer of control of the applicant,
change in applicant's legal classification that results in a change in
control, or change in the required certifications) will not be
permitted after the initial auction application filing deadline. If an
amendment reporting changes is a ``major amendment,'' the major
amendment will not be accepted and may result in the dismissal of the
application.
2. Duty To Maintain Accuracy and Completeness of Auction Application
85. The Commission adopts a procedure, consistent with its spectrum
auctions, requiring each applicant in the 833 Auction to maintain the
accuracy and completeness of information furnished in its pending
auction application. For purposes maintaining the accuracy of the
information in an auction application and associated attachments, the
application remains pending until the release of a public notice
announcing the winning bidders. 833 Auction applicants remain subject
to the prohibition on certain communications until the post-auction
deadline for making final payments (with a late fee) on winning bids.
Also, consistent with the requirements for Commission spectrum
auctions, an applicant for the 833 Auction must furnish additional or
corrected information to Somos within five business days after a
significant occurrence, or amend its auction application no more than
five business days after the applicant becomes aware of the need for
the amendment. An applicant is obligated to amend its pending
application(s) even if a reported change may result in the dismissal of
the application because it is subsequently determined to be a major
modification.
86. An applicant's ability to modify its auction application in the
Somos Auction System may be limited at certain times--e.g., between the
closing of the initial filing window and the opening of the application
resubmission filing window and between the closing of the resubmission
filing window and the release of the public notice announcing the
qualified bidders. During these periods, an applicant may be able to
view its submitted application, but will be unable to make changes. If
an applicant needs to make other permissible minor changes to its
auction application at any time other than during the resubmission
filing window, it must submit a letter briefly summarizing the changes
to its auction application via email to [email protected]. The
email summarizing the changes must include a subject line referring to
the 833 Auction and the name of the applicant, for example, ``Re:
Changes to 833 Auction Application of XYZ Corp.'' Any attachments to
the email must be formatted as Adobe[supreg] Acrobat[supreg] (PDF) or
Microsoft[supreg] Word documents. An applicant that submits its changes
in this manner must subsequently modify, certify, and submit its
auction application(s) electronically in the Somos Auction System once
it is available to applicants.
87. As with filing the auction application, any amendment(s) to the
application and related statements of fact must be certified by an
authorized representative of the applicant with authority to bind the
applicant. Applicants should note that submission of any such amendment
or related statement of fact constitutes a representation by the person
certifying that he or she is an authorized representative with such
authority and that the contents of the amendment or statement of fact
are true and correct.
88. Questions about amendments to the auction application should be
directed to Somos at [email protected] or (844) 439-7666.
IV. Preparing for Bidding in the 833 Auction
A. Due Diligence
89. Each applicant has the sole responsibility for investigating
and evaluating all technical and marketplace factors that may have a
bearing on the value of the toll free numbers that it is seeking in the
833 Auction. The Commission makes no representations or warranties
about the use of the toll free numbers. Each applicant should be aware
that the 833 Auction represents an opportunity to receive the right to
use certain toll free numbers and that the Commission's statutory
authority to add, modify, and eliminate rules governing numbering
applies equally to all toll free numbers, whether acquired through the
competitive bidding process or otherwise. In addition, the 833 Auction
does not constitute an endorsement by the Commission of any particular
service, technology, or product, nor does a right to use the toll free
numbers constitute a guarantee of business success.
90. An applicant should perform its due diligence research and
analysis before proceeding, as it would with any new business venture.
In particular, the Commission strongly encourages each potential
applicant to review all underlying Commission orders, including the
Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order. Each potential applicant
should perform due diligence to assure itself that, should it become a
winning bidder for the right to use one or more 833 numbers offered in
the auction, it will be able to comply with all financial, technical,
and legal requirements.
[[Page 50778]]
91. The Commission also strongly encourages each applicant for the
833 Auction to continue to conduct its own research throughout the
auction in order to determine the existence of pending or future
administrative or judicial proceedings that might affect its
participation in the auction. Each applicant is responsible for
assessing the likelihood of the various possible outcomes and for
considering the potential impact on toll free numbers available in the
833 Auction. The due diligence considerations mentioned in the 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice do not constitute an exhaustive list
of steps that should be undertaken prior to participating in the 833
Auction. The burden is on the potential applicant to determine how much
research to undertake, depending upon the specific facts and
circumstances related to its interests.
92. The Commission makes no representations or guarantees regarding
the accuracy or completeness of information in its databases or any
third-party databases, including, for example, court docketing systems.
To the extent the databases may not include all information deemed
necessary or desirable by an applicant, it must obtain or verify such
information from independent sources or assume the risk of any
incompleteness or inaccuracy in said database.
93. Applicants are solely responsible for identifying associated
risks and for investigating and evaluating the degree to which such
matters may affect their ability to bid on, otherwise acquire, or make
use of toll free numbers available in the 833 Auction. Each potential
applicant is responsible for undertaking research to ensure that any
rights to use toll free numbers won in this auction will be suitable
for its business plans and needs. Each potential applicant must
undertake its own assessment of the relevance and importance of
information gathered as part of its due diligence efforts.
B. Bidder Education
94. The Commission directs Somos to provide detailed educational
information to would-be participants before the opening of the auction
application filing window on October 7, 2019. Specifically, Somos must
provide educational materials on the pre-auction processes in advance
of the opening of the application window, beginning with the release of
step-by-step instructions for completing the auction application. In
addition, the Commission directs Somos to provide an online tutorial
covering information on application procedures (including pre-auction
preparation, completing auction applications, and the application
review process) and bidding procedures. The Commission further directs
Somos to provide educational materials on the bidding process and an
opportunity to practice the bid upload process in advance of the
bidding.
C. Registration for Auction ID
95. As a first step in the 833 Auction application process, an
interested party must acquire an ``Auction ID'' from Somos, which will
verify the potential applicant's identity. Any entity that cannot be
verified through the Somos verification process, or is otherwise unable
to participate in the auction directly, will have the option to
participate in the auction through a RespOrg (i.e., the RespOrg will
bid on its behalf and will be responsible for making final payment on
any winning bids). The Commission proposed this registration process in
the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice and received no comments on it.
This registration procedure is consistent with the need to obtain an
FCC Registration Number (FRN) to apply for Commission auctions.
Therefore, the Commission adopts the proposal and urges interested
parties to allow sufficient time prior to the application deadline to
register so that, should any party encounter difficulties in the
registration process, it would have time to make arrangements to
alternatively participate in the auction through a RespOrg.
D. Auction Application
96. Once Somos verifies an interested party's identity and issues
an ``Auction ID'' to it, the entity must then submit an auction
application (FCC Form 833) electronically via the Somos Auction System.
Applicants must follow the FCC Form 833 instructions that Somos will
release before the application window opens. While no application fee
will be required, the applicant must submit a sufficient upfront
payment to become a qualified bidder.
97. The auction application will become available with the opening
of the initial filing window at 12:00 noon ET on October 7, 2019 and
must be submitted prior to 6:00 p.m. ET on October 18, 2019. Late
applications will not be accepted. Applicants are strongly encouraged
to file early and are responsible for allowing adequate time for filing
their applications.
E. Application Processing and Minor Modifications
1. Public Notice of Applicant's Initial Application Status and
Opportunity for Minor Modifications
98. After the deadline for filing auction applications, Somos will
process all timely submitted applications to determine whether each
applicant has complied with the application requirements and provided
all information concerning its qualifications for bidding. After review
of all the auction applications, Somos will issue a public notice with
applicants' initial application status as either complete or
incomplete. The public notice will include the deadline for
resubmitting corrected applications and a paper copy will be sent to
the contact address listed in the auction application for each
applicant by overnight delivery. In addition, each applicant with an
incomplete application will be sent information on the nature of the
deficiencies in its application, along with the name and phone number
of a Somos staff member who can answer questions specific to the
application.
99. After the initial application filing deadline on October 18,
2019, applicants can make only minor modifications to their
applications. Major modifications (e.g., change toll free number
selections, change in the party on whose behalf the applicant will be
bidding, certain changes in ownership that would constitute an
assignment or transfer of control of the applicant, change in
applicant's legal classification that results in a change in control,
or change in the required certifications) will not be permitted. After
the deadline for resubmitting corrected applications, an applicant will
have no further opportunity to cure any deficiencies in its application
or provide any additional information that may affect the ultimate
determination of whether and to what extent the applicant is qualified
to participate in the 833 Auction.
100. Somos staff will communicate only with an applicant's contact
person or certifying official, as designated on the auction
application, unless the applicant's certifying official or contact
person notifies Somos staff in writing that another representative is
authorized to speak on the applicant's behalf. Authorizations may be
sent by email to [email protected].
[[Page 50779]]
2. Public Notice of Applicant's Final Application Status After Upfront
Payment Deadline
101. After Somos staff review resubmitted applications, Somos will
release a public notice identifying applicants that have become
qualified bidders for that auction. Qualified bidders are those
applicants with submitted auctions applications that are deemed timely
filed and complete and who provided a sufficient upfront payment.
F. Upfront Payments
1. Amount of Upfront Payment and Bidding Eligibility
102. Each potential bidder must provide an upfront payment in a
specified amount for the maximum number of toll free numbers on which
it may wish to submit a bid in the 833 Auction. An upfront payment is a
refundable deposit made by each auction applicant to establish its
eligibility to bid in the auction. Upfront payments protect against
frivolous or insincere bidding and provide a source of funds from which
to collect payments owed at the close of bidding.
103. In the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission
proposed that potential bidders provide an upfront payment of $100 per
number because it wanted to encourage only serious, qualified bidders,
while at the same time, not discourage participation in the auction.
The Commission received no comments on the upfront payment proposal. It
concludes that the proposed upfront payment requirement and the
proposed amount per toll free number will achieve the Commission's
stated goals, and therefore, adopts the proposal. Moreover, since the
833 Auction will serve as an experiment in using competitive bidding
for assigning toll free numbers, the values of the auctioned numbers
can help inform the Commission's decisions regarding upfront payment
amounts in any future toll free number auctions.
104. The Commission reiterates that, if a bidder's winning bids
total less than its upfront payment, any remaining amount will be
refunded to the bidder, minus any default payments that the bidder may
owe. Similarly, if a bidder does not have any winning bids, it will be
reimbursed the entirety of its upfront payment. Moreover, to become a
qualified bidder in the 833 Auction, in addition to having a complete
auction application, an interested party must submit a sufficient
upfront payment. Thus, at a minimum, an applicant must submit $100
(i.e., enough to establish eligibility to bid on at least one toll free
number). Failure to deliver a sufficient upfront payment as instructed
by the applicable upfront payment deadline will result in dismissal of
the auction application and disqualification from participation in the
auction.
2. Submitting an Upfront Payment
105. In order to be eligible to bid in the 833 Auction, an
applicant must submit a sufficient upfront payment to Somos before 6:00
p.m. ET on November 27, 2019. Each applicant is responsible for
ensuring timely submission of its upfront payment.
106. All payments must be made in U.S. dollars.
107. The 833 Auction Comment Public Notice proposed to require
upfront payments of more than $300 be made via wire transfer.
Specifically, the Commission proposed that any upfront payment in
excess of $300 must be made through a wire transfer to Somos (or its
payment designee), and any amounts under this threshold (i.e., $300 or
less) can be made using an alternative payment collection process, such
as Automated Clearing House (ACH). The Commission received no comments
on this proposal or the threshold amount. It finds that the proposed
approach will ensure prompt and assured transfer of funds for those who
plan to bid on more than three toll free numbers, while the alternative
payment process should make it easier for individuals or small entities
that are interested in only a few toll free numbers, and therefore
adopts its proposals. It also adopts the proposal to exclude payments
via check or credit card, as such payment processes have increased
risks associated with them, which would not be conducive to a timely
auction. Thus, the Commission will require payment by wire transfer for
any amount in excess of $300 and allow payment by ACH for $300 or less.
Regardless of its payment method, each applicant is responsible for
obtaining confirmation from its financial institution that its payment
to Somos was successful.
108. Wire Transfer Payment Information. If an applicant is
providing its upfront payment by wire transfer, it should coordinate
with its financial institution well ahead of the due date and allow
sufficient time for the transfer to be initiated and completed prior to
the deadline. The Commission has repeatedly cautioned auction
participants about the importance of planning ahead to prepare for
unforeseen last-minute difficulties in making payments by wire
transfer. The following information will be needed for wire transfers:
ABA Routing Number: 021000021
Receiving Bank: JP Morgan Chase Bank, 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY
10017
Beneficiary: Somos, Inc., Two Tower Center Boulevard, 20th Floor, East
Brunswick, NJ 08816
Account Number: 511665892
Originating Bank Information (OBI field): (skip one space between each
information item)
``833 AUCTIONPAY''
Applicant Auction ID Number: (same as FCC Form 833)
Payer Name: (use exact same entity or individual name as used in FCC
Form 833)
109. ACH Payment Information. If an applicant is providing its
upfront payment by ACH, the following information will be needed:
ABA Routing Number: 021000021
Receiving Bank: JP Morgan Chase Bank, 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY
10017
Beneficiary: Somos, Inc., Two Tower Center Boulevard, 20th Floor, East
Brunswick, NJ 08816
Account Number: 511665892
G. Bidding via Somos Auction System
110. Bidders will be able to participate in the 833 Auction over
the internet using the Somos Auction System. Only qualified bidders are
permitted to bid.
111. The Commission and Somos make no warranties whatsoever, and
shall not be deemed to have made any warranties, with respect to the
Somos Auction System, including any implied warranties of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall
the Commission, Somos, or any of their officers, employees, or agents,
be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, but not limited to,
loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of use, revenue,
or business information, or any other direct, indirect, or
consequential damages) arising out of or relating to the existence,
furnishing, functioning, or use of the Somos Auction System. Moreover,
no obligation or liability will arise out of the technical,
programming, or other advice or service provided by Somos or the
Commission in connection with the Somos Auction System.
112. To the extent an issue arises with the Somos Auction System
itself, the Commission directs Somos to take all appropriate measures
to resolve such issues quickly and equitably. Should an issue arise
that is outside the Somos Auction System or attributable to a bidder,
including, but not limited to, a bidder's hardware, software, or
internet
[[Page 50780]]
access problem that prevents the bidder from submitting a bid prior to
the end of the bidding round, Somos (and the Commission) shall have no
obligation to resolve or remediate such an issue on behalf of the
bidder. Similarly, if an issue arises due to bidder error using the
Somos Auction System, Somos (and the Commission) shall have no
obligation to resolve or remediate such an issue on behalf of the
bidder. Accordingly, after the close of the bidding round, the results
of bid processing will not be altered absent evidence of any failure in
the Somos Auction System.
H. Fraud Alert
113. As is the case with many business investment opportunities,
some unscrupulous entrepreneurs may attempt to use the 833 Auction to
deceive and defraud unsuspecting investors. Common warning signals of
fraud include the following:
The first contact is a ``cold call'' from a telemarketer
or is made in response to an inquiry prompted by a radio or television
infomercial.
The offering materials used to invest in the venture
appear to be targeted at IRA funds, for example, by including all
documents and papers needed for the transfer of funds maintained in IRA
accounts.
The amount of investment is less than $25,000.
The sales representative makes verbal representations that
(a) the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), FCC, or other government
agency has approved the investment; (b) the investment is not subject
to state or Federal securities laws; or (c) the investment will yield
unrealistically high short-term profits. In addition, the offering
materials often include copies of actual FCC releases, or quotes from
FCC personnel, giving the appearance of FCC knowledge or approval of
the solicitation.
114. Information about deceptive telemarketing investment schemes
is available from the FCC as well as the FTC and SEC. Additional
sources of information for potential bidders and investors may be
obtained from the following sources:
The FCC's Consumer Call Center at (888) 225-5322 or by
visiting https://www.fcc.gov/general/frauds-scams-and-alerts-guides
the FTC at (877) FTC-HELP ((877) 382-4357) or by visiting
https://ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/invest/inv03.shtm
the SEC at (202) 942-7040 or by visiting https://www.sec.gov/investor
115. Complaints about specific deceptive telemarketing investment
schemes should be directed to the FTC, the SEC, or the National Fraud
Information Center at (202) 835-0618.
V. Bidding in the 833 Auction
A. Auction Design
116. The Commission decided in the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order that the 833 Auction will be conducted as a single
round, sealed-bid auction. All numbers will be available simultaneously
for bidding during the round, with the winning bid for each number
determined solely by bids for that number, independent of the bids for
any other number. Moreover, the Commission also chose to use a Vickrey
auction, in which the amount paid by the winning bidder is determined
by the second-highest bid. Therefore, in the 833 Auction, the winning
bidder for each 833 number will be the bidder that submits the highest
bid and it will pay the second-highest bid amount for that number.
117. In the event that a toll free number receives only one bid,
the right to use the toll free number will be awarded to the bidder
submitting the sole bid and the bidder will not be required to pay
anything to acquire the rights to the toll free number because there
was no second-highest bid. The Commission proposed this procedure in
the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice and received no comments on it.
Because it is consistent with using a Vickrey auction, the Commission
adopts the proposed procedure for any number in the 833 Auction that
receives only one bid. The fact that the winning bidder in this
scenario will not be required to pay anything to acquire the rights to
the toll free number does not relieve the obligation to pay any other
fees, including regulatory fees to the Commission.
118. To provide for the possibility of tied bids, the Commission
directs Somos to assign a pseudo-random number to each bid for each
toll free number submitted to the 833 Auction. In the event that a toll
free number receives two or more tied bids for the highest amount, the
winning bidder will be the one with the highest pseudo-random number
among the bidders that submitted the tied highest bids. The Commission
proposed in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice using the pseudo-
random number to break tied bids and received no comments on it. It
also received no comments on the proposal that, in the case of tied
bids, the second highest bid amount to be paid by the winning bidder
would be the same amount as the winning's placed bid (i.e., the tied
bid amount). The Commission finds these adopted procedures consistent
with the Vickrey auction design and therefore adopts them as proposed.
B. Auction Structure
1. Bidding Format and Period
119. The format for the 833 Auction will consist of one bidding
round. As noted in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the single
round will occur on one day and the Commission anticipates that the
round will be open for several hours. The Commission received no
comments on the bidding format or bidding period. It directs Somos, in
consultation with the Commission, to announce the actual start and
finish time of the bidding round at least one week before the start of
the auction (i.e., by December 10, 2019). This approach should provide
certainty to the bidders, while providing Somos with flexibility to
adjust the bidding depending on the number of qualified bidders.
120. In the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission
recognized that, because this auction could involve large numbers of
bids and the round will be open for several hours, it does not expect
that telephone bidding will available in the 833 Auction. The
Commission received no comments on this procedure. In the absence of
objection and for ease of auction efficiency, the Commission directs
Somos to conduct bidding via the internet. While Somos should have
telephonic support available to help bidders, the bids must be
submitted online. Therefore, bidders are strongly encouraged to
formulate back-up contingencies to make sure they can submit their bids
online during the bidding round.
2. Information Relating to Auction Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
121. The Commission adopts the proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice that, by public notice or by announcement during the
auction, the Commission, or Somos in consultation with the Commission,
may delay or suspend the auction in the event of a natural disaster,
technical failures, administrative or weather necessity, evidence of an
auction security breach or unlawful bidding activity, or for any other
reason that affects the fair and efficient conduct of competitive
bidding. In such cases, the Commission directs Somos to consult with
Commission staff about resuming, rescheduling, or canceling the auction
[[Page 50781]]
in its entirety. If the bidding is delayed or suspended, the Commission
may direct Somos to resume the auction starting from the beginning of
the scheduled bidding round or for a shorter period, or cancel the
auction in its entirety. The Commission will exercise this authority
solely at its discretion.
C. Bidding Procedures
1. Bidding Eligibility
122. To be eligible to bid in the 833 Auction, an applicant must
submit a sufficient and timely upfront payment. The amount of the
applicant's upfront payment will determine its bidding eligibility--
i.e., a qualified bidder may submit only the number of bids reflected
in its upfront payment. To help illustrate this point: If an applicant
were to select 50 numbers on its application but submits an upfront
payment of only $1,000, it would be able to place bids on only 10
numbers (based on an upfront payment of $100 per number).
123. If a qualified bidder attempts to place more bids than its
bidding eligibility allows, its entire bid submission will be rejected
and the bidder will be given a warning and an opportunity to fix its
bids and re-submit. Neither Somos nor the Commission, however, are
responsible for bids submitted in which the bidder has exceeded its
bidding eligibility. Thus, bidders are strongly encouraged submit their
bids well before the end of the single round to account for any issues
that may arise.
2. Bid Amounts
124. The Commission adopts the proposal in the 833 Auction Comment
Public Notice to allow bids only in whole dollar amounts. The
Commission directs Somos to provide more detailed instructions on how
qualified bidders should submit bids and an opportunity to practice the
bid upload process. Bidders are encouraged to become familiar with the
process well in advance of the bidding round.
3. Bid Removal
125. A bidder will have the ability to remove any bid(s) that it
has placed before the end of the round. The Commission directs Somos to
provide specific instructions on how a bidder may do this. If a bidder
removes any bid that it has placed before the end of the round, it will
not be considered. Once the single round of bidding closes, a bidder
may no longer remove, or otherwise withdraw, any of its bids.
VI. Post-Auction Procedures
A. Public Notice Announcing Winning Bidders
126. In the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, the
Commission stated that, once the bidding concluded, it would release a
public notice identifying the winning bidders and establishing the
deadline for making final payment for winning bids. The Commission also
stated in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order that the public
notice would also explain how unsold inventory will be assigned after
the 833 Auction.
127. In the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the Commission
included, among the various duties that Somos, as the auctioneer, will
perform, the task of announcing the winning bidders. Because Somos will
be the entity that will accept and process the bids for the 833
Auction, the Commission reiterates that Somos will announce the winning
bids.
128. As for any toll free number offered in the 833 Auction that
(i) was not selected on any auction application, (ii) did not receive a
bid, or (iii) received one or more bids but the winning bidder
defaulted, the Commission will issue a decision on how it will assign
such numbers once it reviews the complete results of the 833 Auction.
Two commenters advocate, in the case of defaulted bids, that the
Commission offer the toll free number to the second highest bidder. The
Commission defers until after the auction any decision on how to handle
any numbers offered in the 833 Auction with no bid or where the winning
bidder defaulted. Once the Commission has all the information available
on the 833 Auction experiment, it can better assess how to handle these
numbers.
B. Final Payments
129. Each winning bidder must submit the full payment for its
winning bid(s) within 10 business days following release of the public
notice announcing the winning bidders. Similar to the final payment
procedures in Commission spectrum auctions, the Commission will allow a
winning bidder to make its final payment within five additional
business days after the applicable deadline, provided it also pays a
late fee of 5 percent of the winning bid. The Commission also adopts
the proposal in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice that a winning
bidder will declared in default and subject to the applicable default
payment if it misses the final payment deadline and also fails to remit
the required payment (plus the applicable late fee) by the end of the
late payment period.
130. Like upfront payments, final payments must be made in U.S.
dollars and will be submitted to Somos. Moreover, the Commission adopts
the proposal in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice to require final
payments in excess of $300 to be made through a wire transfer to Somos
(or its payment designee) and any amounts under this threshold (i.e.,
$300 or less) can be made using ACH. Winning bidders can also use a
wire transfer to submit final payments of $300 or less, but also have
the option to use ACH. As with allowing ACH for upfront payments below
a certain threshold, this alternative payment process should make it
easier for individuals or small entities that are the winning bidders
for only a few toll free numbers, while ensuring prompt and assured
payment of funds for those who had winning bids that exceed the $300
threshold. Moreover, as noted in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice,
the Commission proposed to specifically exclude payments via check or
credit card, as such payment processes have increased risks associated
with them, which may not be conducive to a timely post-auction process.
For these reasons, the Commission adopts the proposal and only allows
winning bidders to use ACH as an alternative to wire transfers for
their final payments.
C. Refunds
131. The Commission directs Somos to return any refunds of upfront
payments (minus any final payments and any default payments) within 10
business days after the late final payment deadline (i.e., within 25
business days of the public notice announcing winning bidders). All
refunds of upfront payment balances will be returned to the payer of
record unless the payer submits written authorization to Somos
instructing otherwise.
D. Auction Default Payments
132. If a winning bidder fails to make full payment on its bid or
otherwise defaults for any reason, it will be subject to a default
payment of 35 percent of the defaulted bid. In the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, the Commission stated that it expected that the
procedures for handling defaults be modeled on those used in the
Commission's spectrum auctions, but would defer the decision until the
pre-auction process. In the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, the
Commission proposed basing the default payment for the 833 Auction
[[Page 50782]]
only on a percentage of the defaulted amount, since the Commission has
not yet decided if there will be a subsequent auction of toll free
numbers. Specifically, the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice proposed a
default payment of 35 percent of the defaulted bid, noting that the
default percentage is higher than in most of Commission spectrum
auctions to compensate for the absence of a deficiency portion of the
default payment. The Commission received no comments on the proposed
default procedures or percentage. Because the proposed procedure should
sufficiently discourage insincere bidding and default, the Commission
adopts both the proposed default procedure and default percentage.
Moreover, if a default involves gross misconduct, misrepresentation, or
bad faith by an applicant, the Commission may declare the applicant and
its principals ineligible to bid in future auctions and may take any
other action that it deems necessary, including forfeiture of their
upfront payment and institution of proceedings to revoke any existing
FCC authorizations held by the applicant.
E. Reserving Toll Free Numbers/Declaring a RespOrg
133. Any potential subscriber that directly participates in the 833
Auction and is a winning bidder must work with a RespOrg after the
auction to reserve a number in the Toll Free Database in accordance
with Sec. 52.101 of the Commission's rules. The Commission adopts the
proposal in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice to require such
declaration within 15 business days after the public notice announcing
the winning bidders. If a winning bidder experiences problems working
with RespOrgs such that it would be unable through no fault of its own
to meet this deadline, it could report the problems to Somos, which
will hold the number while these issues are resolved, and request
waiver of the 15 business day deadline, consistent with the
Commission's existing waiver standard.
F. Secondary Market Considerations
134. The secondary market, allowing the sale of numbers assigned
during the 833 Auction, is a key component of the auction and the
Commission's overall toll free assignment modernization efforts. As the
Commission explained in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order, a
secondary market ``promotes the efficient operation of an auction''
and, consistent with its goal of promoting a market-based approach to
toll free number assignment, helps ensure that numbers are assigned to
those parties who can most efficiently use them. The Commission thus
adopts procedures to allow for a secondary market for those 833 toll
free numbers assigned via competitive bidding.
135. To evaluate the operation of this new secondary market, and
consistent with the requirement established in the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order, the Commission directs Somos to collect and
maintain information on the parties involved in the secondary market
transactions and make that information available to the Commission.
Based on the proposal in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, and the
comments filed in the record, the Commission determines that RespOrgs
must submit the information specified below about the parties involved
in post-auction secondary market transactions involving their
subscribers to Somos within 60 days of the RespOrg's actual knowledge
of the transaction. This requirement will be included in Somos's
tariff.
136. As an initial matter, the Commission permits parties to
acquire and transfer the rights to use all numbers that were assigned
via the 833 Auction. Two commenters argue that only 833 numbers that
receive multiple bids at auction should be able to be bought and sold
in the secondary market. Only one commenter explains the rationale for
this argument: CenturyLink claims that the Commission should limit the
secondary market in this way because, by allowing every auctioned
number to be transferred on the secondary market, the Commission would
``afford[ ] a special status and related reporting requirements to
numbers based on competitive interest that was fleeting and not
demonstrated at the auction.'' But CenturyLink misunderstands why the
Commission chose to liberalize its secondary market rules for numbers
assigned at auction in the first place. The Commission created an
exception to the secondary market rules for numbers assigned via
competitive bidding to ``promote[ ] the efficient operation of an
auction'' because it ``allows subscribers to purchase or sell numbers
in response to the outcome of the auction, and limits pre-auction costs
associated with estimating which--and how many--numbers a bidder may
win.'' The proposed limitation would create uncertainty for prospective
bidders about whether they will be able to transfer in the secondary
market a given number on which they wish to bid and therefore it would
frustrate this purpose. The Commission finds no reason to limit the
ability of parties to buy and sell numbers in the secondary market
beyond what was set forth in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order.
137. Consistent with the proposal in the 833 Auction Comment Public
Notice, the Commission directs Somos to collect information regarding
secondary market transactions. Specifically, the Commission directs
Somos to collect contact information of both parties to a transaction
including (i) name, (ii) address, (iii) email address, and (iv) phone
number. This information will allow the Commission to fully evaluate
the operation of the secondary market and will promote certainty and
combat fraud in the marketplace by keeping track of change of title,
both of which are important components to this toll free number auction
experiment. The Commission does not, however, require Somos to collect
information on the sale date and price. After reviewing the record, the
Commission is persuaded by commenters who argue that subscribers may be
hesitant to share sensitive business information such as the sale
price, and it is not the Commission's intent with the reporting
requirement to impede the robust operation of the secondary market. One
commenter contends that the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice, as it
relates to the data collection and reporting obligation, ``leaves some
basic definitional problems unresolved.'' This obligation extends to
transactions which would violate the Commission's brokering rule but
are allowed by the exception for numbers assigned via competitive
bidding. Put differently, covered transactions are those which result
in the reassignment of an 833 number from one subscriber to another,
bypassing the spare pool, which would have violated the Commission's
prior first-come, first-served rule.
138. The Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order established a
requirement that RespOrgs report the required secondary market
transaction information to Somos. To implement this requirement and
incentivize RespOrgs to provide this information promptly, the 833
Auction Comment Public Notice proposed that RespOrgs must submit this
information to Somos within 60 days of a transaction, against the
penalty of denying access to the Toll Free Database until the
information is reported, which would be included in the Somos tariff.
The Commission adopts this proposal, with the modification based on the
record that a RespOrg has 60 days from the time it has actual knowledge
of the transaction within which to report the required information. The
Commission further
[[Page 50783]]
adopts the proposal to allow a RespOrg to withhold service from a
subscriber until it receives the necessary information. Finally, the
Commission clarifies that, in the case of a transfer of a number that
is also accompanied by a change of RespOrg, this obligation only
applies to the RespOrg providing service to the purchasing subscriber.
139. The Commission is convinced by RespOrg commenters that they
may not have reason to know of a secondary market transaction by one of
their subscribers in all instances. To address this concern, the
Commission provides RespOrgs 60 days from the date of actual knowledge
of a transaction to report the information noted above about the
secondary market transaction, rather than 60 days from the date of the
transaction itself. This change in when the reporting obligation is
triggered will avoid a situation in which a RespOrg is denied access to
the Toll Free Database for a transaction of which it is unaware. The
Commission nonetheless expects RespOrgs to exercise due diligence in
monitoring secondary market transactions involving their subscribers.
140. RespOrg commenters argue that this requirement places too
large of a burden on RespOrgs because the penalty for non-reporting is
too harsh. The Commission disagrees. The Commission believes that the
actual knowledge standard adopted reasonably moderates the penalty; the
penalty is not triggered until a RespOrg has actual knowledge of a
secondary market transaction for 60 days yet nonetheless fails to meet
its obligation to report the transaction. In such a situation, the
Commission finds the penalty appropriate, given its interest in
tracking and analyzing the secondary market in toll free numbers during
this experiment. The Commission also concludes that the actual
knowledge standard negates the need for Somos to provide RespOrgs a 30-
day cure period prior to imposing the penalty; the cure period was a
response to the concern that RespOrgs may not know that a secondary
market transaction occurred, which is obviated by the adoption of an
actual knowledge standard. Further, the penalty for non-reporting is
removed when a RespOrg provides Somos with the necessary transaction
information. The Commission declines to go further and place an
affirmative obligation on subscribers to report secondary market
transaction information to Somos, as some commenters suggest, because
such an obligation was not contemplated in the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order. And because the Commission does not find this
obligation to be overly burdensome for RespOrgs, it declines to adopt
alternative approaches suggested in the record.
VII. Procedural Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
141. This document implements the information collections adopted
in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order and contains additional
information collection(s) subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. The Commission is currently seeking PRA
approval for information collections related to the auction application
process and the secondary market. In the present document, and its
related information collection, the Commission requires the following
information from potential bidders: (1) Applicant contact and other
details; (2) direct ownership interests; (3) indirect ownership
interests; (4) real parties in interests; (5) FCC-regulated entities or
applicants for a FCC license in which the applicant, any real party in
interest, or any direct interest holder of 10 percent or greater owns
10 percent or more stock; (7) whether the applicant is bidding on
behalf of other entities; (8) disclosure of any allowable bidding
arrangements; (9) the toll free numbers on which the applicant wishes
to bid; and (10) any other exhibits or documentation the applicant
deems necessary to apply to bid in the auction. Without this collected
information, neither the Commission nor Somos (on the Commission's
behalf) can hold the 833 Auction, nor can potential bidders participate
in it.
142. In addition, with respect to post auction secondary market
transactions, Somos will collect contact information on the
Commission's behalf from parties to secondary market transactions. This
information will allow the Commission to fully evaluate the operation
of the secondary market, which is an important component to this toll
free number auction experiment.
B. Congressional Review Act
143. The Commission will send a copy of the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice, including the Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, in a report to Congress and the Government Accountability
Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.
C. Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
144. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA),
an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was incorporated in the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization
Order, 82 FR 47669, Oct. 13, 2017, pursuant to which the 833 Auction
will be conducted. A Supplemental Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (Supplemental IRFA) was incorporated in the 833 Auction
Comment Public Notice. The Commission sought written public comments on
the Supplemental IRFA. No comments were filed addressing the
Supplemental IRFA. A Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) was
also incorporated in the Toll Free Assignment Modernization Order. The
Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (Supplemental FRFA)
in the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice supplements the FRFA to
reflect the actions taken in the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice
and conforms to the RFA.
145. Need for, and Objectives of, the Public Notice. The 833
Auction Procedures Public Notice implements the auction procedures to
be used by the Commission and Somos for competitive bidding in the 833
Auction for certain toll free numbers in the 833 code. The procedures
adopted for the 833 Auction seek to balance three goals: (1) Promoting
competition in the auction; (2) avoiding undue burdens on the
applicants; and (3) assigning the 833 toll free numbers as
expeditiously as possible. Moreover, the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice provides an overview of the procedures, auction dates and
deadlines, requirements for participants, terms and conditions
governing the 833 Auction and the post-auction requirements and payment
processes.
146. To promote an efficient and fair administration of the
competitive bidding process that will benefit all 833 Auction
participants, including small entities, the Commission adopts the
following procedures:
Allow potential subscribers to participate in the 833
Auction either through a RespOrg that will bid on all the numbers in
which the subscriber is interested in acquiring, or by submitting its
own application and bidding for all the numbers in which it is
interested;
require each applicant in the 833 Auction to certify that
(1) if it is bidding on its own behalf, it is also not participating in
the auction through another entity and/or, if it is bidding on behalf
of potential subscribers that it is not aware that the potential
subscriber(s) are participating through another applicant; and (2) it,
or any commonly-controlled entity, is not submitting multiple
applications in the 833 Auction, utilizing the Commission's definitions
for control adopted for
[[Page 50784]]
similar purposes in its spectrum auctions;
prohibit each applicant in the 833 Auction from
cooperating or collaborating with any other applicant with respect to
its own, or one another's, or any other competing applicant's bids or
bidding strategies, and will be prohibited from communicating with any
other applicant in any manner the substance of its own, or one
another's, or any other competing applicant's bids or bidding
strategies (including the post-auction market for toll free numbers);
prohibit certain agreements between applicants (whether
the applicants are RespOrgs or potential subscribers) in the 833
Auction, and certain auction-related agreements among RespOrgs even
where only one of the RespOrgs is an applicant in the 833 Auction;
require any applicant RespOrg that bids for a potential
subscriber to acquire a letter of authorization from the potential
subscriber;
require applicants to first acquire an ``Auction ID'' from
Somos, which will verify the potential applicant's identity, and if any
entity cannot be verified through the Somos verification process, it
must then participate through a RespOrg;
require each applicant, on its auction application, (1)
identify each number on which it wishes to be able to bid and, for each
number, the party (either itself or another entity) for which it is
bidding, (2) provide the same level of ownership disclosure required in
Commission auctions, (3) disclose any auction-related agreement, and
(4) certify that it is not currently in default or delinquent on a non-
tax debt to the Federal Government;
for determining the winning bidder on tied bids for a toll
free number, use a pseudorandom number assigned to each bid, and for
only one bid received for a toll free number, assign the sole bidder
the number and require no payment;
conduct the 833 Auction using procedures for limited
information disclosure;
require potential bidders provide an upfront payment of
$100 per number, and treat all funds that a RespOrg submits as an
upfront payment in the auction (regardless of whether the funds came
from the RespOrg or a potential subscriber for which the RespOrg is
bidding) as the upfront payment of the RespOrg that will be used to
offset the final payment obligation for any winning bids of the
RespOrg;
establish a default payment of 35 percent of the defaulted
bid;
require full payment within 10 business days following
release of the public notice of the winning bids, or full payment plus
a 5 percent late fee, within five additional business days;
require any potential subscriber that directly
participates in the 833 Auction and is a winning bidder to declare its
intent to work with a specific RespOrg within 15 business days
following release of the public notice of winning bids; and
require Somos to collect additional information on
secondary markets and require RespOrgs submit all required data about
post-auction secondary market transactions within 60 days of the
RespOrg's knowledge of a transaction.
147. Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in
Response to Supplemental IRFA. There were no comments filed that
addressed the procedures and policies proposed in the Supplemental
IRFA.
148. Response to Comments by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. Pursuant to the Small Business Jobs Act
of 2010, which amended the RFA, the Commission is required to respond
to any comment filed by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA) and to provide a detailed statement of
any change made to the proposed procedures as a result of those
comments. The Chief Counsel did not file any comments in response to
the proposed procedures in the 833 Auction Comment Public Notice.
149. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to
Which the Procedures Will Apply. The RFA directs agencies to provide a
description of, and, where feasible, an estimate of the number of small
entities that may be affected by the procedures adopted herein. The RFA
generally defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning
as the terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small
governmental jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business''
has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the
Small Business Act. A ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of
operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the
SBA.''
150. As noted above, FRFA was incorporated in the Toll Free
Assignment Modernization Order. In that analysis, the Commission
described in detail the small entities that might be significantly
affected. In the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice, the Commission
incorporates by reference the descriptions and estimates of the number
of small entities from the previous FRFA in the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order in WC Docket No. 17-192.
151. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small Entities. The Commission designed the
auction application process itself to minimize reporting and compliance
requirements for applicants, including small business applicants.
Parties desiring to participate in the 833 Auction must file an
application in which they certify under penalty of perjury as to their
qualifications. Eligibility to participate in bidding is based on an
applicant's auction application and certifications, as well as its
upfront payment. The Commission decided in the Toll Free Assignment
Modernization Order that it will not require applicants to submit a
long-form application after the conclusion of the 833 Auction, given
the lack of need to verify winning bidders' qualifications in this
context and to limit the administrative burden on bidders, including
small business entities.
152. The 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice provides instructions
for each 833 Auction applicant to maintain the accuracy of its
respective auction application electronically using the Somos Auction
System and/or by direct communication with Somos. More specifically,
small entities and other 833 Auction applicants will be qualified to
bid in the auction only if they comply with the following: (1)
Submission of an auction application (FCC Form 833) that is timely and
is found to be substantially complete; and (2) timely submission of a
sufficient upfront payment. An applicant whose application is found to
contain deficiencies will have a limited opportunity during a
resubmission window to bring its application into compliance with
procedures set forth in the 833 Auction Procedures Public Notice.
153. In the second phase of the process, there are additional
compliance requirements for winning bidders. As with other winning
bidders, any small entity that is a winning bidder will be required to
submit the full payment for its winning bid(s) within 10 business days
following release of the public notice announcing the winning bidders,
or within 15 business days following release of the public notice
announcing the winning bidders provided it also pays a late fee of 5
percent of the winning bid.
154. Steps Taken to Minimize the Significant Economic Impact on
Small
[[Page 50785]]
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered. The RFA requires an
agency to describe any significant, specifically small business,
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): ``(1)
the establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements under the rule for such small
entities; (3) the use of performance rather than design standards; and
(4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for
such small entities.''
155. The Commission believes that the steps described below to
facilitate participation in 833 Auction will result in both operational
and administrative cost savings for small entities and other auction
participants. For example, assigning toll free numbers through
competitive bidding will benefit smaller entities rather than the prior
first-come first-served basis which favored larger, more sophisticated
entities that had invested in obtaining enhanced connectivity to the
Toll Free Database. Moreover, the Commission also elected to allow
potential subscribers, many of which are smaller entities, the choice
between participating directly in the auction or indirectly through a
RespOrg. In addition, the Commission created an alternative payment
mechanism that will be available for both upfront and final payments,
in which applicants can submit payments via ACH instead of wire
transfer if the payments are below a $300 threshold. The Commission
believes such measures will benefit small entities, who may be
interested in only acquiring one or perhaps a few toll free numbers.
156. The procedures adopted in the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice to facilitate participation in the 833 Auction will result in
both operational and administrative cost savings for small entities and
other auction participants. In light of the numerous resources that
will be available from the Commission and Somos at no cost, the
processes and procedures adopted in the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice should result in minimal economic impact on small entities. For
example, prior to the auction, small entities and other auction
participants may seek clarification of or guidance on complying with
application procedures, reporting requirements, and the bidding system.
Small entities as well as other auction participants will be able to
avail themselves of (1) a web-based, interactive online tutorial to
familiarize themselves with auction procedures, filing requirements,
bidding procedures, and other matters related to the 833 Auction and
(2) a telephone hotline to assist with issues such as access to or
navigation within the auction application system. The Commission and
Somos also make copies of Commission decisions available to the public
without charge, providing a low-cost mechanism for small businesses to
conduct research prior to and throughout the auction. In addition,
Somos will post public notices on its website, making this information
easily accessible and without charge to benefit all 833 Auction
applicants, including small businesses. These steps are made available
to facilitate participation in the 833 Auction by all eligible bidders
and may result in significant cost savings for small business entities
who utilize these alternatives. Moreover, the adoption of bidding
procedures in advance of the auctions is designed to ensure that the
833 Auction will be administered predictably and fairly for all
participants, including small businesses.
157. The Commission will send a copy of the 833 Auction Procedures
Public Notice, including the Supplemental FRFA, to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the SBA. A copy of the 833 Auction Procedures Public
Notice (or summary thereof) will also be published in the Federal
Register.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-20526 Filed 9-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P