Cyclaniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances, 50761-50763 [2019-20525]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0194; FRL–9998–87]
Cyclaniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of cyclaniliprole
in or on multiple commodities that are
identified and discussed later in this
document. ISK Biosciences Corporation
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
SUMMARY:
This regulation is effective
September 26, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before November 25, 2019 and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0194, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goodis, Director, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number (703) 305–7090;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test
guidelines referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines.’’
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2018–0194 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
November 25, 2019. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2018–0194, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50761
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of Tuesday,
July 24, 2018 (83 FR 34968) (FRL–9980–
31), EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 7F8651) by ISK
Biosciences Corporation, 7470 Auburn
Rd, Suite A, Concord, OH 44077. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.694
be amended by establishing tolerances
for residues of the insecticide
cyclaniliprole, 3-bromo-N-[2-bromo-4chloro-6-[[(1-cyclopropylethyl)amino]
carbonyl]phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide,
in or on the following commodities:
Citrus fruit (crop group 10–10) at 0.5
parts per million (ppm); tuberous &
corm vegetables (crop group 1C) at 0.01
ppm; and berry & small fruit (crop
subgroup 13–07A, 13–07B, 13–07E
except grape, and 13–07G) at 1.5 ppm.
That document referenced a summary of
the petition prepared by ISK
Biosciences Corporation, the registrant,
which is available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing tolerances that vary from
the levels requested as allowed by
section 408(d)(4)(A)(i) of FFDCA. The
reason for these changes are explained
in Unit IV.D.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
50762
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue.’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for cyclaniliprole
including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with cyclaniliprole is
summarized as follows.
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability as well as
the relationship of the results of the
studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
No single or repeated dose study
performed by any route of exposure
produced an adverse effect following
cyclaniliprole exposure at dose levels
below, at, or above the limit dose (1,000
milligrams/kilogram/day (mg/kg/day)).
Although the oral toxicity studies in
dogs were conducted at approximately a
third of the limit dose, no adverse
effects were seen. It is unlikely that
cyclaniliprole would produce adverse
liver effects, if tested at higher doses in
dogs as a structurally related chemical,
chlorantraniliprole, was tested up to the
limit dose in dogs and did not
demonstrate liver effects. There is no
evidence that cyclaniliprole produces
increased susceptibility with prenatal or
postnatal exposures. Cyclaniliprole is
considered not likely to be carcinogenic
based on no increase in treatmentrelated tumor incidence in
carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice
and no genotoxicity.
Specific information on the studies
received for cyclaniliprole as well as the
no-observed-adverse-effect-level
(NOAEL) from the toxicity studies can
be found at https://www.regulations.gov
in document, ‘‘Cyclaniliprole: Human
Health Risk Assessment for the
Proposed New Uses on Bushberry
Subgroup 13–07B; Caneberry Subgroup
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
13–07A; Citrus Fruit Crop Group 10–10;
Low Growing Berry Subgroup 13–07G;
Small Fruit Vine Climbing (except
Grape) Subgroup 13–07E; and Tuberous
and Corm Vegetables Crop Subgroup
1C.’’, dated October 17, 2018 in docket
ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0194.
Based on the review of the available
cyclaniliprole toxicological studies, no
toxicity endpoints or points of departure
were selected for risk assessment. Based
on the toxicological profile of
cyclaniliprole, EPA has concluded that
the FFDCA requirements to retain an
additional safety factor for protection of
infants and children and to consider
cumulative effects do not apply. Section
408(b)(2)(C) requires an additional
tenfold margin of safety in the case of
threshold risks, which cyclaniliprole
does not present. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v)
requires consideration of information
concerning cumulative effects of
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity, which
cyclaniliprole does not have.
There is a potential for exposure to
cyclaniliprole residues via food and
drinking water based on existing uses
and the proposed uses for cyclaniliprole
application directly to growing crops.
These applications can also result in
cyclaniliprole reaching surface and
ground water, both of which can serve
as sources of drinking water. Moreover,
there are no proposed uses in residential
settings; therefore, there are no
anticipated residential exposures.
Determination of safety. Based on the
available data indicating a lack of
adverse effects from exposure to
cyclaniliprole, EPA concludes that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result to the general population, or
to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to cyclaniliprole.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methods have
been proposed for plants (Method
JSM0269) and livestock commodities
(Method JSM0277). For plants and
livestock, cyclaniliprole residues are
extracted using acetonitrile, cleaned up
and analyzed by liquid chromatography
with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–
MS/MS). The validated limit of
quantitation (LOQ) was 0.01 ppm for
plants and livestock commodities. All
concurrent recoveries of cyclaniliprole
at the fortification level of 0.01 ppm in
the field trials and processing studies
were within the acceptable range of 70–
120%. The method is considered
suitable for enforcement purposes.
Adequate independent laboratory
validation (ILV) and adequate radio-
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
validation studies were conducted for
the methods.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established MRLs
for cyclaniliprole.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
Tolerances were requested for citrus
fruit (crop group 10–10) at 0.5 ppm;
tuberous & corm vegetables (crop group
1C) at 0.01 ppm; and berry & small fruit
(crop subgroup 13–07A, 13–07B, 13–
07E except grape, and 13–07G) at 1.5
ppm.
EPA considered commodity
definitions and additional information
provided by ISK Biosciences
Corporation, including field trial
residues that were adjusted by
proportionality to reflect the proposed
used pattern and used the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) statistical
calculation procedures to determine the
appropriate tolerance value which
resulted in a different tolerance value
for each of these subgroups than what
the petitioner requested.
EPA is establishing separate subgroup
tolerances for fruit, citrus, group 10–10,
in anticipation of the establishment of
subgroup MRLs by Codex, rather than a
single group MRL. For citrus fruit crop
group 10–10, EPA is establishing
tolerances for orange subgroup 10–10A
at 0.4 ppm, lemon/lime subgroup 10–
10B at 0.3 ppm, and grapefruit subgroup
10–10C at 0.2 ppm. Based on processing
studies, EPA is further establishing
tolerances for fruit, citrus, group 10–10,
oil at 30 ppm in accordance with its
regulatory requirement to establish
tolerances for processed commodities
made necessary by the use of the
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
pesticide on the commodities in the
underlying crop group.
For tuberous & corm vegetables (crop
group 1C), EPA is establishing the
tolerance at 0.01 ppm. Based on
processing information and in
accordance with 40 CFR 180.40(f), EPA
is further establishing a tolerance for
potato (wet peel) at 0.06 ppm.
For the berries, the registrant
proposed tolerances as berry and small
fruit (Crop Subgroups 13–07A, 13–07B,
13–07E (except grape), and 13–07G at
1.5 ppm. HED is recommending for
individual crop subgroup tolerances,
with the tolerance level based on the
representative commodities for the
specific subgroups. For the berry and
small fruit subgroups, EPA is
establishing the tolerance for caneberry
subgroup 13–07A at 0.8 ppm; bushberry
subgroup 13–07B at 1.5 ppm; fruit,
small vine climbing (except grape)
subgroup 13–07E at 1 ppm; and berry,
low growing, subgroup 13–07G at 0.4
ppm.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
V. Conclusion
Although the lack of toxicity supports
a safety finding for an exemption from
the requirement of tolerance for all
crops, EPA is establishing tolerances for
residues resulting from direct
applications to certain commodities
because the petitioner requested them
for international trade purposes.
Tolerances are established for residues
of cyclaniliprole, 3-bromo-N-[2-bromo4-chloro-6-[[(1cyclopropylethyl)amino]carbonyl]
phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)1Hpyrazole-5-carboxamide in or on
orange subgroup 10–10A at 0.4 ppm;
lemon/lime subgroup 10–10B at 0.3
ppm; grapefruit subgroup 10–10C at 0.2
ppm; and fruit, citrus, group 10–10, oil
at 30 ppm; vegetable, tuberous and
corm, subgroup 1C at 0.01 ppm; and
potato, wet peel at 0.06 ppm; caneberry
subgroup 13–07A at 0.8 ppm; bushberry
subgroup 13–07B at 1.5 ppm; fruit,
small, vine climbing, except grape,
subgroup 13–07E at 1 ppm; and berry,
low growing, subgroup 13–07G at 0.4
ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.). This action does not
involve any technical standards that
would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50763
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: September 10, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.694, add alphabetically the
following commodities to the table in
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 180.694 Cyclaniliprole; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
Parts
per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Berry, low growing, subgroup
13–07G ...................................
Bushberry subgroup 13–07B ......
Caneberry subgroup 13–07A .....
*
*
*
*
*
Fruit, citrus, group 10–10, oil ......
*
*
*
*
*
Fruit, small, vine climbing, except grape, subgroup 13–07E
*
*
*
*
*
Grapefruit subgroup 10–10C ......
*
*
*
*
*
Lemon/lime subgroup 10–10B ...
*
*
*
*
*
Orange subgroup 10–10A ..........
Potato, wet peel ..........................
*
*
*
*
*
Vegetable, tuberous and corm,
subgroup 1C ...........................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–20525 Filed 9–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
0.4
1.5
0.8
30
1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.06
*
0.01
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50761-50763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20525]
[[Page 50761]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0194; FRL-9998-87]
Cyclaniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
cyclaniliprole in or on multiple commodities that are identified and
discussed later in this document. ISK Biosciences Corporation requested
these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective September 26, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before November 25, 2019
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0194, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Director, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP
test guidelines referenced in this document electronically, please go
to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ``Test Methods and Guidelines.''
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0194 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
November 25, 2019. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0194, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of Tuesday, July 24, 2018 (83 FR 34968)
(FRL-9980-31), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 7F8651) by ISK Biosciences Corporation, 7470 Auburn Rd,
Suite A, Concord, OH 44077. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.694
be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide
cyclaniliprole, 3-bromo-N-[2-bromo-4-chloro-6-[[(1-
cyclopropylethyl)amino]carbonyl]phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-
pyrazole-5-carboxamide, in or on the following commodities: Citrus
fruit (crop group 10-10) at 0.5 parts per million (ppm); tuberous &
corm vegetables (crop group 1C) at 0.01 ppm; and berry & small fruit
(crop subgroup 13-07A, 13-07B, 13-07E except grape, and 13-07G) at 1.5
ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by ISK
Biosciences Corporation, the registrant, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing tolerances that vary from the levels requested as allowed
by section 408(d)(4)(A)(i) of FFDCA. The reason for these changes are
explained in Unit IV.D.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes
[[Page 50762]]
exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does
not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for cyclaniliprole including
exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action.
EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with cyclaniliprole
is summarized as follows.
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
No single or repeated dose study performed by any route of exposure
produced an adverse effect following cyclaniliprole exposure at dose
levels below, at, or above the limit dose (1,000 milligrams/kilogram/
day (mg/kg/day)). Although the oral toxicity studies in dogs were
conducted at approximately a third of the limit dose, no adverse
effects were seen. It is unlikely that cyclaniliprole would produce
adverse liver effects, if tested at higher doses in dogs as a
structurally related chemical, chlorantraniliprole, was tested up to
the limit dose in dogs and did not demonstrate liver effects. There is
no evidence that cyclaniliprole produces increased susceptibility with
prenatal or postnatal exposures. Cyclaniliprole is considered not
likely to be carcinogenic based on no increase in treatment-related
tumor incidence in carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice and no
genotoxicity.
Specific information on the studies received for cyclaniliprole as
well as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) from the toxicity
studies can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in document,
``Cyclaniliprole: Human Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed New
Uses on Bushberry Subgroup 13-07B; Caneberry Subgroup 13-07A; Citrus
Fruit Crop Group 10-10; Low Growing Berry Subgroup 13-07G; Small Fruit
Vine Climbing (except Grape) Subgroup 13-07E; and Tuberous and Corm
Vegetables Crop Subgroup 1C.'', dated October 17, 2018 in docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0194.
Based on the review of the available cyclaniliprole toxicological
studies, no toxicity endpoints or points of departure were selected for
risk assessment. Based on the toxicological profile of cyclaniliprole,
EPA has concluded that the FFDCA requirements to retain an additional
safety factor for protection of infants and children and to consider
cumulative effects do not apply. Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires an
additional tenfold margin of safety in the case of threshold risks,
which cyclaniliprole does not present. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) requires
consideration of information concerning cumulative effects of
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity, which
cyclaniliprole does not have.
There is a potential for exposure to cyclaniliprole residues via
food and drinking water based on existing uses and the proposed uses
for cyclaniliprole application directly to growing crops. These
applications can also result in cyclaniliprole reaching surface and
ground water, both of which can serve as sources of drinking water.
Moreover, there are no proposed uses in residential settings;
therefore, there are no anticipated residential exposures.
Determination of safety. Based on the available data indicating a
lack of adverse effects from exposure to cyclaniliprole, EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure
to cyclaniliprole.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methods have been proposed for plants (Method
JSM0269) and livestock commodities (Method JSM0277). For plants and
livestock, cyclaniliprole residues are extracted using acetonitrile,
cleaned up and analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass
spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The validated limit of quantitation (LOQ) was
0.01 ppm for plants and livestock commodities. All concurrent
recoveries of cyclaniliprole at the fortification level of 0.01 ppm in
the field trials and processing studies were within the acceptable
range of 70-120%. The method is considered suitable for enforcement
purposes. Adequate independent laboratory validation (ILV) and adequate
radio-validation studies were conducted for the methods.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established MRLs for cyclaniliprole.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
Tolerances were requested for citrus fruit (crop group 10-10) at
0.5 ppm; tuberous & corm vegetables (crop group 1C) at 0.01 ppm; and
berry & small fruit (crop subgroup 13-07A, 13-07B, 13-07E except grape,
and 13-07G) at 1.5 ppm.
EPA considered commodity definitions and additional information
provided by ISK Biosciences Corporation, including field trial residues
that were adjusted by proportionality to reflect the proposed used
pattern and used the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) statistical calculation procedures to determine the
appropriate tolerance value which resulted in a different tolerance
value for each of these subgroups than what the petitioner requested.
EPA is establishing separate subgroup tolerances for fruit, citrus,
group 10-10, in anticipation of the establishment of subgroup MRLs by
Codex, rather than a single group MRL. For citrus fruit crop group 10-
10, EPA is establishing tolerances for orange subgroup 10-10A at 0.4
ppm, lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B at 0.3 ppm, and grapefruit subgroup 10-
10C at 0.2 ppm. Based on processing studies, EPA is further
establishing tolerances for fruit, citrus, group 10-10, oil at 30 ppm
in accordance with its regulatory requirement to establish tolerances
for processed commodities made necessary by the use of the
[[Page 50763]]
pesticide on the commodities in the underlying crop group.
For tuberous & corm vegetables (crop group 1C), EPA is establishing
the tolerance at 0.01 ppm. Based on processing information and in
accordance with 40 CFR 180.40(f), EPA is further establishing a
tolerance for potato (wet peel) at 0.06 ppm.
For the berries, the registrant proposed tolerances as berry and
small fruit (Crop Subgroups 13-07A, 13-07B, 13-07E (except grape), and
13-07G at 1.5 ppm. HED is recommending for individual crop subgroup
tolerances, with the tolerance level based on the representative
commodities for the specific subgroups. For the berry and small fruit
subgroups, EPA is establishing the tolerance for caneberry subgroup 13-
07A at 0.8 ppm; bushberry subgroup 13-07B at 1.5 ppm; fruit, small vine
climbing (except grape) subgroup 13-07E at 1 ppm; and berry, low
growing, subgroup 13-07G at 0.4 ppm.
V. Conclusion
Although the lack of toxicity supports a safety finding for an
exemption from the requirement of tolerance for all crops, EPA is
establishing tolerances for residues resulting from direct applications
to certain commodities because the petitioner requested them for
international trade purposes. Tolerances are established for residues
of cyclaniliprole, 3-bromo-N-[2-bromo-4-chloro-6-[[(1-
cyclopropylethyl)amino]carbonyl] phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-
1Hpyrazole-5-carboxamide in or on orange subgroup 10-10A at 0.4 ppm;
lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B at 0.3 ppm; grapefruit subgroup 10-10C at
0.2 ppm; and fruit, citrus, group 10-10, oil at 30 ppm; vegetable,
tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C at 0.01 ppm; and potato, wet peel at
0.06 ppm; caneberry subgroup 13-07A at 0.8 ppm; bushberry subgroup 13-
07B at 1.5 ppm; fruit, small, vine climbing, except grape, subgroup 13-
07E at 1 ppm; and berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G at 0.4 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 10, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.694, add alphabetically the following commodities to
the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.694 Cyclaniliprole; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G......................... 0.4
Bushberry subgroup 13-07B................................... 1.5
Caneberry subgroup 13-07A................................... 0.8
* * * * *
Fruit, citrus, group 10-10, oil............................. 30
* * * * *
Fruit, small, vine climbing, except grape, subgroup 13-07E.. 1
* * * * *
Grapefruit subgroup 10-10C.................................. 0.2
* * * * *
Lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B.................................. 0.3
* * * * *
Orange subgroup 10-10A...................................... 0.4
Potato, wet peel............................................ 0.06
* * * * *
Vegetable, tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C................... 0.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-20525 Filed 9-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P