Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2020 Atlantic Shark Commercial Fishing Year, 49236-49244 [2019-20249]
Download as PDF
49236
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 190913–0027]
RIN 0648–XT004
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
2020 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Year
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
adjust quotas and retention limits, and
establish opening dates for the 2020
fishing year for the Atlantic commercial
shark fisheries. Quotas would be
adjusted as required or allowable based
on any overharvests and/or
underharvests experienced during the
2019 fishing year. In addition, NMFS
proposes opening dates and commercial
retention limits based on adaptive
management measures to provide, to the
extent practicable, fishing opportunities
for commercial shark fishermen in all
regions and areas. The proposed
measures could affect fishing
opportunities for commercial shark
fishermen in the northwestern Atlantic
Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico, and the
Caribbean Sea.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by October 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2019–0091, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20190091, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Guy DuBeck, NMFS/SF1, 1315 EastWest Highway, National Marine
Fisheries Service, SSMC3, Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Copies of this proposed rule and
supporting documents are available
from the HMS Management Division
website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantichighly-migratory-species or by
contacting Guy DuBeck by phone at
301–427–8503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guy
DuBeck or Karyl Brewster-Geisz at 301–
427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark
fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species (HMS) Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) and its amendments are
implemented by regulations at 50 CFR
part 635. For the Atlantic commercial
shark fisheries, the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments
established commercial shark retention
limits, commercial quotas for species
and management groups, and
accounting measures for underharvests
and overharvests for the shark fisheries.
The FMP also includes adaptive
management measures, such as flexible
opening dates for the fishing year and
inseason adjustments to shark trip
limits, which provide management
flexibility in furtherance of equitable
fishing opportunities, to the extent
practicable, for commercial shark
fishermen in all regions and areas.
2020 Proposed Commercial Shark
Quotas
This proposed rule would adjust the
quota levels for the different shark
stocks and management groups for the
2019 Atlantic commercial shark fishing
year based on overharvests and
underharvests that occurred during the
2019 fishing year, consistent with
existing regulations at 50 CFR 635.27(b).
Overharvests and underharvests are
accounted for in the same region, subregion, and/or fishery in which they
occurred the following year, except that
large overharvests may be spread over a
number of subsequent fishing years up
to a maximum of five years. Shark
stocks that are overfished, have
overfishing occurring, or have an
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
unknown status, as well as management
groups that contain one or more stocks
that are overfished, have overfishing
occurring, or have an unknown stock
status, will not have underharvest
carried over in the following year.
Stocks or management groups that are
not overfished and have no overfishing
occurring may have any underharvest
carried over in the following year, up to
50 percent of the base annual quota.
Based on 2019 harvests to date, and
after considering catch rates and
landings from previous years, NMFS
proposes to adjust the 2020 quotas for
certain management groups as shown in
Table 1. In the final rule, any
adjustments to the quotas will be based
on how the quotas are affected by new
data from dealer reports received by late
October to mid-November 2019. Thus,
all of the 2020 proposed quotas for the
respective stocks and management
groups will be subject to further
adjustment after NMFS considers the
dealer reports through late October to
mid-November. NMFS anticipates that
all dealer reports that are received after
the late October to mid-November date
will be used to adjust 2021 quotas, as
appropriate.
Because the Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark management group and
smoothhound shark management groups
in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
regions are not overfished, and
overfishing is not occurring, available
underharvest (up to 50 percent of the
base annual quota) from the 2019
fishing year for these management
groups may be applied to the respective
2020 quotas. NMFS proposes to account
for any underharvest of Gulf of Mexico
blacktip sharks by dividing
underharvest between the eastern and
western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional
quotas based on the sub-regional quota
split percentage implemented in
Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR 50073;
August 18, 2015).
For the sandbar shark, aggregated
large coastal shark (LCS), hammerhead
shark, non-blacknose small coastal
shark (SCS), blacknose shark, blue
shark, porbeagle shark, and pelagic
shark (other than porbeagle or blue
sharks) management groups, the 2019
underharvests cannot be carried over to
the 2020 fishing year because those
stocks or management groups are
overfished, are experiencing
overfishing, or have an unknown status.
There also were no overharvests in these
management groups. Thus, NMFS
proposes that quotas for these
management groups be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment,
although the final quotas will be based
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
on current data at the time the final rule
is prepared.
The proposed 2020 quotas by species
and management group are summarized
in Table 1; the description of the
49237
calculations for each stock and
management group can be found below.
TABLE 1—2020 PROPOSED QUOTAS AND OPENING DATES FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUPS
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. Table includes landings data as of September
13, 2019; final quotas are subject to change based on landings as of late October to mid-November 2019. 1 mt = 2,204.6 lb]
Region or
sub-region
Management group
2019 annual quota
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(D + C)
Western Gulf of Mexico
Blacktip Sharks 3 .......
250.8 mt dw (552,919
lb dw)5.
22.0 mt dw (48,501 lb
dw) 5.
3.9 mt dw (8,598 lb
dw) 5.
32.7 mt dw (72,091 lb
dw) 5.
135.5 mt dw (298,726
lb dw) 5.
21.4 mt dw (47,178 lb
dw) 5.
112.6 mt dw (248,215
lb dw).
504.6 mt dw
(1,112,441 lb dw).
168.9 mt dw (372,552
lb dw).
27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb
dw).
264.1 mt dw (582,333
lb dw).
17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb
dw).
62.2 mt dw (137,118
lb dw).
11.7 mt dw (25,805 lb
dw).
<0.5 mt dw (<1,300 lb
dw).
7.2 mt dw (15,778 lb
dw).
61.3 mt dw (135,227
lb dw).
9.2 mt dw (20,353 lb
dw).
34.5 mt dw (76,027 lb
dw).
<5.0 mt dw (<11,000
lb dw).
34.5 mt dw (76,011 lb
dw).
9.3 mt dw (20,479 lb
dw).
83.8 mt dw (184,735
lb dw).
7.9 mt dw 17,431 lb
dw.
127.9 mt dw
(281,899.8 lb dw).
...................................
231 mt dw (510,261
lb dw).
72.0 mt dw (158,724
lb dw).
11.9 mt dw (26,301 lb
dw).
25.1 mt dw (55,439 lb
dw).
85.5 mt dw (188,593
lb dw).
13.4 mt dw (29,421 lb
dw).
112.6 mt dw (248,215
lb dw).
336.4 mt dw (741,627
lb dw).
168.9 mt dw (372,552
lb dw).
27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb
dw).
264.1 mt dw (582,333
lb dw).
17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb
dw).
358.9 mt dw (792,161
lb dw).
72.0 mt dw (158,724
lb dw).
11.9 mt dw (26,301 lb
dw).
39.0 mt dw (86,066.7
lb dw).
85.5 mt dw (188,593
lb dw).
13.4 mt dw (29,421 lb
dw).
112.6 mt dw (248,215
lb dw).
504.6 mt dw
(1,112,441 lb dw).
168.9 mt dw (372,552
lb dw).
27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb
dw).
264.1 mt dw (582,333
lb dw).
17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb
dw).
1,802.6 mt dw
(3,973,902 lb dw).
50.0 mt dw (110,230
lb dw).
90.7 mt dw (199,943
lb dw).
273.0 mt dw (601,856
lb dw).
1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb
dw).
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb dw).
279.6 mt dw (616,326
lb dw).
10.1 mt dw (22,195 lb
dw).
50.6 mt dw (111,542
lb dw).
0 mt dw (0 lb dw) ......
600.9 mt dw
(1,324,634 lb dw).
...................................
<0.5 mt dw (<1,000 lb
dw).
28.6 mt dw (63,006 lb
dw).
...................................
1,201.7 mt dw
(2,649,268 lb dw).
50.0 mt dw (110,230
lb dw).
90.7 mt dw (199,943
lb dw).
273.0 mt dw (601,856
lb dw).
1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb
dw).
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb dw).
1,802.6 mt dw
(3,971,587 lb dw).
50.0 mt dw (110,230
lb dw).
90.7 mt dw (199,943
lb dw).
273.0 mt dw (601,856
lb dw).
1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb
dw).
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb dw).
Aggregated 4 Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Eastern Gulf of Mexico
Blacktip Sharks 3 .......
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Gulf of Mexico .............
Atlantic .........................
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Smoothhound Sharks
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks .....
(South of 34° N lat.
only).
Smoothhound Sharks
No regional quotas ......
Non-Sandbar LCS
Research.
Sandbar Shark Research.
Blue Sharks ..............
Porbeagle Sharks .....
Pelagic Sharks Other
Than Porbeagle or
Blue.
Preliminary 2019
landings 1
Adjustments 2
...................................
13.9 mt dw (30,627.7
lb dw).
...................................
...................................
...................................
168.2 mt dw (370,814
lb dw).
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
2020 base annual
quota
2020 proposed
annual quota
Season opening
dates
January 1, 2020.
January 1, 2020.
January 1, 2020.
January 1, 2020.
1 Landings
are from January 1, 2019, through September 13, 2019, and are subject to change.
2 Underharvest adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring. Also, the underharvest adjustments cannot exceed
50 percent of the base annual quota.
3 This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2019. This proposed rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 141.8 mt dw (281,899.8 lb dw). Since any underharvest would be divided based on the sub-regional quota percentage split, the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota would be increased by 127 mt dw, or 90.2 percent of the underharvest,
while the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota would be increased by 13.9 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the underharvest.
4 While the western Gulf of Mexico Aggregated LCS quota was still under the limit when the 2019 final rule was released, the quota was exceeded by the end of the year. However, current
landings are at 11 percent of the available 2019 quota and current catch rates do not indicate the quota will be fully landed. This underharvest (62.3 mt dw) is much greater than the 2018 overharvest (8.0 mt dw; 17,548 lb dw lb dw). Therefore, NMFS is proposing that the 2019 quota be adjusted to account for the 2018 overharvest, and the 2020 quota be equal to the annual base
quota without adjustment.
5 NMFS transferred 5 mt dw of the blacktip shark quota, 50 mt dw of the aggregated LCS quota, and 8 mt dw of the hammerhead shark quota from the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region to
the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region on September 12, 2019.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Proposed 2020 Quotas for the Gulf of
Mexico Region Shark Management
Groups
In a recent action, NMFS transferred
5 mt dw of the blacktip shark quota, 50
mt dw of the aggregated LCS quota, and
8 mt dw of the hammerhead shark quota
from the western Gulf of Mexico subregion to the eastern Gulf of Mexico subregion on September 12, 2019. This
quota transfer would not impact the
proposed actions in this rulemaking.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for blacktip sharks in the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region is 358.9 mt dw
(792,161lb dw) and the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region is 39.0 mt dw
(86,066.7 lb dw; Table 1). As of
September 13, 2019, preliminary
reported landings for blacktip sharks in
the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
were at 25 percent (62.2 mt dw) of their
2019 quota levels (250.8 mt dw), and
blacktip sharks in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region were at 22 percent
(7.2 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels
(32.7 mt dw). Reported landings in both
sub-regions have not exceeded the 2019
quota to date, and blacktip shark
landings in both sub-regions are lower
than usual. Gulf of Mexico blacktip
sharks have not been declared to be
overfished, to have overfishing
occurring, or to have an unknown
status. Pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2)(ii),
underharvests for blacktip sharks within
the Gulf of Mexico region therefore may
be applied to the 2019 quotas, up to 50
percent of the base annual quota.
Additionally, any underharvest would
be divided between the two sub-regions,
based on the percentages that are
allocated to each sub-region, which are
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
set forth in § 635.27(b)(1)(ii)(C). To date,
the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark management group is
underharvested by 214.1 mt dw
(472,114 lb dw). Accordingly, NMFS
proposed to increase the western Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark quota by 127.9 mt
dw or 90.2 percent of the underharvest,
while the eastern Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark sub-regional quota would
increase by 13.9 mt dw, or 9.8 percent
of the underharvest (Table 1). Thus, the
proposed western sub-regional Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark commercial quota
is 358.9 mt dw (792,161 lb dw), and the
proposed eastern sub-regional Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark commercial quota
is 39.0 mt dw (86,066.7 lb dw).
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for aggregated LCS in the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region is 72.0 mt dw
(141,176 lb dw), and the eastern Gulf of
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
49238
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Mexico sub-region is 85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb dw; Table 1). As of
September 13, 2019, preliminary
reported landings for aggregated LCS in
the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region
were at 53 percent (11.7 mt dw) of the
2019 quota (22.0 mt dw), while the
aggregated LCS in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region were at 45 percent
(61.3 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels
(135.5 mt dw). NMFS is proposing to
adjust the 2019 aggregated LCS quota in
the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region
to account for an 8 mt dw overharvest
that occurred in 2018. While the quota
was still under the limit when the 2019
Atlantic Shark Commercial Fishing Year
final rule was released (83 FR 60777;
November 27, 2018), the quota was
exceeded by the end of the 2019
calendar year, as later revealed by
updated data received in 2019.
Although NMFS generally accounts for
later-reported overages in the
subsequent year (here, 2020), NMFS
has, under certain circumstances, readjusted the subject year quota if
appropriate. Given that 2019 landings
are low, current catch rates indicate that
the 2019 quota will not be fully landed,
and that there is time to further adjust
this approach, if needed, in the final
rule in response to any updated
landings information. NMFS is
proposing that the 2019 sub-regional
quota be adjusted to account for the
2018 overharvest, and is proposing that
the 2020 quota for the aggregated LCS in
the western Gulf of Mexico be equal to
the annual base quota without
adjustment. NMFS proposes to re-adjust
the western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional
quota by 8 mt dw (17,548 lb dw) from
the 2019 quota. If catch rates do
increase, and the revised 2019 subregional quota is exceeded, then NMFS
would, in the final rule, reduce the 2020
quota by that overharvest. Based on
preliminary estimates and catch rates
from previous years, and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2020 quota for aggregated LCS in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region be
equal to the annual base quota without
adjustment, because the overall regional
quota has not been overharvested and
because underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.
The 2020 proposed commercial
quotas for hammerhead sharks in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region and
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region are
11.9 mt dw (26,301 lb dw) and 13.4 mt
dw (29,421 lb dw), respectively (Table
1). As of September 13, 2019,
preliminary reported landings for
hammerhead sharks in the western Gulf
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
of Mexico sub-region were less than 12
percent (<0.5 mt dw) of their 2019 quota
levels (3.9 mt dw), while landings of
hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf
of Mexico sub-region were at 43 percent
(9.2 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels
(21.4 mt dw). Reported landings from
both Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
regions have not exceeded the 2019
overall hammerhead quota to date.
Given the overfished status of the
scalloped hammerhead shark, the
hammerhead shark quota cannot be
adjusted for any underharvests.
Therefore, based on both preliminary
estimates and catch rates from previous
years and the fact that the 2019 overall
hammerhead shark quota has not been
overharvested to date, and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), NMFS proposes that
the 2020 quotas for hammerhead sharks
in the western Gulf of Mexico and
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-regions be
equal to their annual base quotas
without adjustment.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for non-blacknose SCS in the Gulf of
Mexico region is 112.6 mt dw (248,215
lb dw). As of September 13, 2019,
preliminary reported landings of nonblacknose SCS were at 31 percent (34.5
mt dw) of their 2019 quota level (112.6
mt dw) in the Gulf of Mexico region.
Reported landings have not exceeded
the 2019 quota to date. Given the
unknown status of bonnethead sharks
within the Gulf of Mexico nonblacknose SCS management group,
underharvests cannot be carried
forward, pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2)(ii).
Under current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), underharvests cannot be
carried over due to stock status. Based
on both preliminary estimates and catch
rates from previous years, and because
there have not been any overharvests,
NMFS proposes that the 2020 quota for
non-blacknose SCS in the Gulf of
Mexico region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment. There is
no allowable harvest of blacknose
sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441
lb dw). As of September 13, 2019,
preliminary reported landings of
smoothhound sharks were less than 5
percent (<4.9 mt dw) in the Gulf of
Mexico region. Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound sharks have not been
declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an
unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico region therefore could be
applied to the 2020 quotas up to 50
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
percent of the base annual quota.
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to
increase the 2020 Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound shark quota to adjust for
anticipated underharvests in 2019 as
allowed. The proposed 2020 adjusted
base annual quota for Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound sharks is 504.6 mt dw
(336.4 mt dw) annual base quota + 168.2
mt dw 2019 underharvest = 504.6 mt dw
2020 adjusted annual quota).
2. Proposed 2020 Quotas for the Atlantic
Region Shark Management Groups
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for aggregated LCS in the Atlantic region
is 168.9 mt dw (372,552 lb dw). As of
September 13, 2019, the aggregated LCS
fishery in the Atlantic region is still
open, and preliminary landings indicate
that only 20 percent of the quota, or 34.5
mt dw, has been harvested. Given the
unknown status of some of the shark
species within the Atlantic aggregated
LCS management group, underharvests
cannot be carried over pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
both preliminary estimates and catch
rates from previous years, and
consistent with current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2020 quota for aggregated LCS in the
Atlantic region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests,
and underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.ey End:?≤
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for hammerhead sharks in the Atlantic
region is 27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb dw).
Currently, the hammerhead shark
fishery in the Atlantic region is still
open and preliminary landings as of
September 13, 2019, indicate that 34
percent of the Atlantic regional quota, or
9.3 mt dw, has been harvested. Reported
landings from both Gulf of Mexico and
Atlantic regions have not exceeded the
2019 overall hammerhead quota to date.
Given the overfished status of
hammerhead sharks, underharvests
cannot be carried forward pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
both preliminary estimates and catch
rates from previous years, and
consistent with the current regulations
at § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that
the 2020 quota for hammerhead sharks
in the Atlantic region be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment,
because the overall hammerhead shark
quota has not been overharvested, and
because underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for non-blacknose SCS in the Atlantic
region is 264.1 mt dw (582,333 lb dw).
As of September 13, 2019, preliminary
reported landings of non-blacknose SCS
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
were at 32 percent (83.8 mt dw) of their
2019 quota level in the Atlantic region.
Reported landings have not exceeded
the 2019 quota to date. Given the
unknown status of bonnethead sharks
within the Atlantic non-blacknose SCS
management group, underharvests
cannot be carried forward pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates of catch rates
from previous years, and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2020 quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Atlantic region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests,
and because underharvests cannot be
carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota
for blacknose sharks in the Atlantic
region is 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw).
This quota is available in the Atlantic
region only for those vessels operating
south of 34° N latitude. North of 34° N
latitude, retention, landing, or sale of
blacknose sharks is prohibited. As of
September 13, 2019, preliminary
reported landings of blacknose sharks
were at 46 percent (7.9 mt dw) of their
2019 quota levels in the Atlantic region.
Reported landings have not exceeded
the 2019 quota to date. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2), because blacknose sharks
have been declared to be overfished
with overfishing occurring in the
Atlantic region, NMFS could not carry
forward the remaining underharvest.
Therefore, NMFS proposes that the 2020
Atlantic blacknose shark quota be equal
to the annual base quota without
adjustment.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota
for smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic
region is 1,802.6 mt dw (3,973,902 lb
dw). As of September 13, 2019,
preliminary reported landings of
smoothhound sharks were at 16 percent
(279.6 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels
in the Atlantic region. Atlantic
smoothhound sharks have not been
declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an
unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Atlantic
region therefore could be applied to the
2020 quotas up to 50 percent of the base
annual quota. Accordingly, NMFS
proposes to increase the 2020 Atlantic
smoothhound shark quota to adjust for
anticipated underharvests in 2019 as
allowed. The proposed 2020 adjusted
base annual quota for Atlantic
smoothhound sharks is 1,802.6 mt dw
(1,201.7 mt dw annual base quota +
600.9 mt dw 2019 underharvest =
1,802.6 mt dw 2020 adjusted annual
quota).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
3. Proposed 2020 Quotas for Shark
Management Groups With No Regional
Quotas
The 2020 proposed commercial
quotas within the shark research fishery
are 50 mt dw (110,230 lb dw) for
research LCS and 90.7 mt dw (199,943
lb dw) for sandbar sharks. Within the
shark research fishery, as of September
13, 2019, preliminary reported landings
of research LCS were at 20 percent (10.1
mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels, and
sandbar shark reported landings were at
56 percent (50.6 mt dw) of their 2019
quota levels. Reported landings have not
exceeded the 2019 quotas to date. Under
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), because sandbar
sharks and scalloped hammerhead
sharks within the research LCS
management group are either not
overfished or overfishing is not
occurring, underharvests for these
management groups cannot be carried
forward to the 2020 quotas. Therefore,
based on preliminary estimates, and
consistent with the current regulations
at § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that
the 2020 quota in the shark research
fishery be equal to the annual base
quota without adjustment because there
have not been any overharvests, and
because underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.
The 2020 proposed commercial
quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle sharks,
and pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle
or blue sharks) are 273.0 mt dw (601,856
lb dw), 1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb dw), and
488.0 mt dw (1,075,856 lb dw),
respectively. As of September 13, 2019,
there were no preliminary reported
landings of blue sharks, porbeagle shark
reported landings were at <33 percent
(<0.5 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels,
and landings of pelagic sharks (other
than porbeagle and blue sharks) were at
6 percent (28.6 mt dw) of their 2019
quota level (488.0 mt dw). Given that
these pelagic species are overfished,
have overfishing occurring, or have an
unknown status, underharvests cannot
be carried forward pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2020 quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle
sharks, and pelagic sharks (other than
porbeagle and blue sharks) be equal to
their annual base quotas without
adjustment, because there have not been
any overharvests and because
underharvests cannot be carried over
due to stock status.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49239
4. Proposed Opening Dates and
Retention Limits for the 2020 Atlantic
Commercial Shark Fishing Year
For each fishery, NMFS considered
the seven ‘‘Opening Commercial Fishing
Season Criteria’’ listed at § 635.27(b)(3).
The criteria includes factors such as the
available annual quotas for the current
fishing season, estimated season length
and average weekly catch rates from
previous years, length of the season and
fishery participation in past years,
impacts to accomplishing objectives of
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments, temporal
variation in behavior or biology of target
species (e.g., seasonal distribution or
abundance), impact of catch rates in one
region on another, and effects of delayed
openings.
NMFS applied the Opening
Commercial Fishing Season Criteria by
examining the overharvests and
underharvests of the different
management groups in the 2019 fishing
year to determine the likely effects of
the proposed commercial quotas for
2020 on shark stocks and fishermen
across regional and sub-regional fishing
areas. NMFS also examined the
potential season length and previous
catch rates to ensure, to the extent
practicable, that equitable fishing
opportunities be provided to fishermen
in all areas. Lastly, NMFS examined the
seasonal variation of the different
species/management groups and the
effects on fishing opportunities.
NMFS also considered the six
‘‘inseason trip limit adjustment criteria’’
listed at § 635.24(a)(8) for directed shark
limited access permit holders intending
to land LCS other than sandbar sharks.
Those criteria are: The amount of
remaining shark quota in the relevant
area or region, to date, based on dealer
reports; the catch rates of the relevant
shark species/complexes, to date, based
on dealer reports; the estimated date of
fishery closure based on when the
landings are projected to reach 80percent of the available overall,
regional, and/or sub-regional quota, if
the fishery’s landings are not projected
to reach 100 percent of the applicable
quota before the end of the season, or
when the season of a quota-linked
management group is closed; effects of
the adjustment on accomplishing the
objectives of the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments;
variations in seasonal distribution,
abundance, or migratory patterns of the
relevant shark species based on
scientific and fishery-based knowledge;
and/or effects of catch rates in one part
of a region precluding vessels in another
part of that region from having a
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
49240
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
reasonable opportunity to harvest a
portion of the relevant quota.
After considering all these criteria,
NMFS is proposing to open the 2020
Atlantic commercial shark fishing
season for all shark management groups
in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean,
including the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean Sea, on or about January 1,
2020, after the publication of the final
rule for this action (Table 2). NMFS is
also proposing to start the 2020
commercial shark fishing season with
the commercial retention limit of 45
LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip in both the eastern and
western Gulf of Mexico sub-regions, and
a commercial retention limit of 25 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip in the Atlantic region (Table 2).
NMFS will consider public comments
received during the current year and
catch rates from this year. Any retention
limits that are proposed could change as
a result of public comments as well as
catch rates and landings information
based on updated data available when
drafting the final rule.
TABLE 2—QUOTA LINKAGES, SEASON OPENING DATES, AND COMMERCIAL RETENTION LIMIT BY REGIONAL OR SUBREGIONAL SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP
Commercial retention limits for directed
shark limited access permit holders
(inseason adjustments are possible)
Region or sub-region
Management group
Quota linkages
Season opening dates
Western Gulf of Mexico.
Blacktip Sharks ..........
Not Linked ..................
January 1, 2020 .........
45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip.
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks.
Blacktip Sharks ..........
Linked.
January 1, 2020 .........
45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. 1
Not Linked ..................
January 1, 2020 .........
N/A.
Not Linked ..................
Linked ........................
January 1, 2020 .........
January 1, 2020 .........
N/A.
25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip.
If quota is landed quickly (e.g., if approximately 20 percent of quota is caught at
the beginning of the year), NMFS anticipates an inseason reduction (e.g., to 3 or
fewer LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip), then an inseason increase
to 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip around July 15, 2020. 2
N/A.
Eastern Gulf of Mexico.
Gulf of Mexico ............
Atlantic .......................
No regional quotas ....
Not Linked ..................
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks.
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Smoothhound Sharks
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Linked.
....................................
....................................
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks
(South of 34° N lat.
only).
Smoothhound Sharks
Non-Sandbar LCS Research.
Sandbar Shark Research.
Blue Sharks ...............
Porbeagle Sharks.
Pelagic Sharks Other
Than Porbeagle or
Blue.
Linked (South of 34°
N lat. only).
....................................
January 1, 2020 .........
Not Linked ..................
Linked ........................
January 1, 2020 .........
January 1, 2020 .........
8 Blacknose sharks per vessel per trip (applies to directed and incidental permit
holders).
N/A.
N/A.
Not Linked ..................
January 1, 2020 .........
N/A.
....................................
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
1 NMFS may consider a higher starting retention limit for the entire region of 55 sharks per trip to increase the harvest level and ensure the
management group can maximize its quota. NMFS is asking for comments specifically on this potential increase in retention limits.
2 NMFS is proposing changing the percent of quota harvested at which it considers adjusting the retention limit. Rather than 20 percent, NMFS
would consider adjustment at a higher percentage to allow fishermen in the Atlantic region to more fully utilize the quota. NMFS is asking for
comment specifically on this potential change in the benchmark (percent of quota harvested) at which NMFS considers an inseason adjustment.
Additionally, NMFS is also considering an increase from the initial 25 sharks per trip in the beginning of the fishing year to a higher number of
landings per trip, within the 55 sharks per trip limit. NMFS is specifically asking for comments on these potential changes.
In the Gulf of Mexico region, NMFS
proposes opening the fishing season on
or about January 1, 2020, for the
aggregated LCS, blacktip sharks, and
hammerhead shark management groups
with the commercial retention limits of
45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip for directed shark permit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
holders in the eastern and western subregion. This opening date and retention
limit combination would provide, to the
extent practicable, equitable
opportunities across the fisheries
management sub-regions. This opening
date takes into account all the season
opening criteria listed in § 635.27(b)(3),
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and particularly the criteria that
requires NMFS to consider the length of
the season for the different species and/
or management group in the previous
years (§ 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)) and
whether fishermen were able to
participate in the fishery in those years
(§ 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The proposed
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
commercial retention limits take into
account the criteria listed in
§ 635.24(a)(8), and particularly the
criterion that requires NMFS to consider
the catch rates of the relevant shark
species/complexes based on dealer
reports to date (§ 635.24(a)(8)(ii)). NMFS
may also adjust the retention limit in
the Gulf of Mexico region throughout
the season to ensure fishermen in all
parts of the region have an opportunity
to harvest aggregated LCS, blacktip
sharks, and hammerhead sharks (see the
criteria listed at § 635.27(b)(3)(v) and
§ 635.24(a)(8)(ii), (v), and (vi)). For both
the eastern and western Gulf of Mexico
sub-regions combined, dealer reports
received through September 13, 2019,
indicate that 24 percent (69.4 mt dw), 46
percent (73.0 mt dw), and less than 40
percent (<10.0 mt dw) of the available
blacktip, aggregated LCS, and
hammerhead shark quotas, respectively,
has been harvested. Therefore, for 2020,
NMFS is considering opening the both
the western and eastern Gulf of Mexico
sub-regions at 45 sharks per trip, but
may also consider a higher starting
retention limit for the entire region of 55
sharks per trip to increase the harvest
level and ensure the management group
can maximize its quota. NMFS is asking
for comments specifically on this
potential increase in retention limits.
In the Atlantic region, NMFS
proposes opening the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management
groups on or about January 1, 2020. This
opening date is the same date that these
management groups opened in 2019. As
described below, this opening date also
takes into account all the criteria listed
in § 635.27(b)(3), and particularly the
criterion that NMFS consider the effects
of catch rates in one part of a region
precluding vessels in another part of
that region from having a reasonable
opportunity to harvest a portion of the
different species and/or management
quotas (§ 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The 2019 data
indicates that an opening date of
January 1, coupled with inseason
adjustments to the retention limit,
provided a reasonable opportunity for
fishermen in every part of each region
to harvest a portion of the available
quotas (§ 635.27(b)(3)(i)) while
accounting for variations in seasonal
distribution of the different species in
the management groups
(§ 635.27(b)(3)(iv)). In 2019, when the
aggregated LCS quota was harvested too
quickly, NMFS reduced the retention
limit to three sharks per trip (April 2,
2019; 84 FR 12524) to allow fishermen
in the North Atlantic an opportunity to
fish later in the year when sharks are
available in the North Atlantic area (see
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
the criteria at § 635.24(a)(3)(i), (ii), (v),
and (vi)). NMFS then increased the
retention limit to 36 sharks per trip on
June 25, 2019 (84 FR 29808), to increase
fishing opportunities for all fishermen
across the Atlantic region. Because the
quotas we propose for 2020 are the same
as the quotas in 2019, NMFS proposes
that the season lengths and therefore the
participation of various fishermen
throughout the region, would be similar
in 2020 (§ 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)).
Based on the recent performance of the
fishery, the January 1 opening date
appears to meet the objectives of the
2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments (§ 635.27(b)(3)(vi)).
However, after reviewing landings data
from 2016 to the present, NMFS has
seen a decrease in landings over time in
the aggregated LCS management group.
Because of the decrease in landings,
NMFS is also proposing changing the
percent of quotas harvested at which it
considers adjusting the retention limit.
Rather than 20 percent, NMFS would
consider adjustments at a higher
percentage to allow fishermen in the
Atlantic region to more fully utilize the
quota. While this is not a regulatory
provision, it is a management
benchmark NMFS has used (and
announced as part of the rulemaking
process) in previous seasons to help
determine at which point it will
consider an inseason action to adjust the
retention limits. NMFS is asking for
comment specifically on this potential
change in the benchmark (percent of
quota harvested) at which NMFS
considers an inseason adjustment.
In addition, for the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management
groups in the Atlantic region, NMFS
proposes opening the fishing year with
the commercial retention limit for
directed shark limited access permit
holders of 25 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip. This retention
limit should allow fishermen to harvest
some of the 2020 quota at the beginning
of the year when sharks are more
prevalent in the South Atlantic area (see
the criteria at § 635.24(a)(3)(i), (ii), (v),
and (vi)). As was done in 2019, if it
appears that the quota is being
harvested too quickly to allow directed
fishermen throughout the entire region
an opportunity to fish and ensure
enough quota remains until later in the
year, NMFS would reduce the
commercial retention limits to
incidental levels (3 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip) or
another level calculated to reduce the
harvest of LCS taking into account
§ 635.27(b)(3) and the inseason trip limit
adjustment criteria listed in
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49241
§ 635.24(a)(8). If the quota continues to
be harvested quickly, NMFS could
reduce the retention limit to 0 LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip
to ensure enough quota remains until
later in the year. If either situation
occurs, NMFS would publish in the
Federal Register notification of any
inseason adjustments of the retention
limit to an appropriate limit of sharks
per trip. NMFS will consider increasing
the commercial retention limits per trip
at a later date, if necessary, to provide
fishermen in the northern portion of the
Atlantic region an opportunity to retain
aggregated LCS and hammerhead sharks
after considering the appropriate
inseason adjustment criteria. Similarly,
at some point later in the year, NMFS
may consider increasing the retention
limit to 36 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip or another
amount, as deemed appropriate, after
considering the inseason trip limit
adjustment criteria. If the quota is being
harvested too quickly or too slowly,
NMFS could adjust the retention limit
appropriately to ensure the fishery
remains open most of the rest of the
year. However, as stated above, NMFS
has noticed a decrease in annual
landings from 2016 to present. As such,
in addition to the proposed change to
the percent of quota harvested, NMFS is
also considering an increase from the
initial 25 sharks per trip in the
beginning of the fishing year to a higher
number of landings per trip, within the
55 sharks per trip limit. Changes to
either the percent of quota harvested or
the initial retention limit (or both) could
allow fishermen in the Atlantic region
to more fully utilize the quota. NMFS is
specifically asking for comments on
these potential changes.
All of the shark management groups
would remain open until December 31,
2020, or until NMFS determines that the
landings for any shark management
group have reached, or are projected to
reach, 80-percent of the available
overall, regional, and/or sub-regional
quota, if the fishery’s landings are not
projected to reach 100 percent of the
applicable quota before the end of the
season, or when the quota-linked
management group is closed. If NMFS
determines that a non-linked shark
species or management group must be
closed, then, consistent with
§ 635.28(b)(2) for non-linked quotas
(e.g., eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip,
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip, Gulf of
Mexico non-blacknose SCS, pelagic
sharks, or the Atlantic or Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound sharks), NMFS will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of closure for that shark species, shark
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
49242
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
management group, region, and/or subregion that will be effective no fewer
than four days from the date of filing (83
FR 31677; July 9, 2018). For the blacktip
shark management group, regulations at
§ 635.28(b)(5)(i) through (v) authorize
NMFS to close the management group
before landings reach, or are expected to
reach, 80-percent of the available
overall, regional, and/or sub-regional
quota, after considering the following
criteria and other relevant factors:
Season length based on available subregional quota and average sub-regional
catch rates; variability in regional and/
or sub-regional seasonal distribution,
abundance, and migratory patterns;
effects on accomplishing the objectives
of the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments; amount of
remaining shark quotas in the relevant
sub-region; and regional and/or subregional catch rates of the relevant shark
species or management groups. From
the effective date and time of the closure
until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal
Register, that additional quota is
available and the season is reopened,
the fisheries for the shark species or
management group are closed, even
across fishing years.
If NMFS determines that a linked
shark species or management group
must be closed, then, consistent with
§ 635.28(b)(3) for linked quotas and the
Final Rule to Revise Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species Shark Fishery
Closure Regulations (83 FR 31677; July
9, 2018), NMFS will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of closure for
all of the species and/or management
groups in a linked group that will be
effective no fewer than four days from
date of filing. In that event, from the
effective date and time of the closure
until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal
Register, that additional quota is
available and the season is reopened,
the fisheries for all linked species and/
or management groups will be closed,
even across fishing years. The linked
quotas of the species and/or
management groups are Atlantic
hammerhead sharks and Atlantic
aggregated LCS; eastern Gulf of Mexico
hammerhead sharks and eastern Gulf of
Mexico aggregated LCS; western Gulf of
Mexico hammerhead sharks and
western Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS;
and Atlantic blacknose and Atlantic
non-blacknose SCS south of 34° N
latitude.
Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may
be submitted via www.regulations.gov or
by mail. NMFS solicits comments on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
this proposed rule by October 10, 2019
(see DATES and ADDRESSES). As noted
above, NMFS is specifically asking for
comments on three distinct issues—the
initial LCS retention limit in the Gulf of
Mexico region, the level of landings at
which NMFS considers adjusting the
retention limit for the Atlantic region,
and the initial LCS retention limit in the
Atlantic region.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that the proposed rule is
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments,
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
NMFS determined that the final rules
to implement Amendment 2 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (June
24, 2008, 73 FR 35778; corrected on July
15, 2008, 73 FR 40658), Amendment 5a
to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP (78 FR 40318; July 3, 2013),
Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR 50073;
August 18, 2015), and Amendment 9 to
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP (80 FR 73128; November 24, 2015)
are consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies
of the approved coastal management
program of coastal states on the Atlantic
including the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean Sea as required under the
Coastal Zone Management Act. Pursuant
to 15 CFR 930.41(a), NMFS provided the
Coastal Zone Management Program of
each coastal state a 60-day period to
review the consistency determination
and to advise NMFS of their
concurrence. NMFS received
concurrence with the consistency
determinations from several states and
inferred consistency from those states
that did not respond within the 60-day
time period. This proposed action to
establish opening dates and adjust
quotas for the 2020 fishing year for the
Atlantic commercial shark fisheries
does not change the framework
previously consulted upon. Therefore,
no additional consultation is required.
An initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would
have on small entities. The IRFA
analysis follows.
Section 603(b)(1) of the RFA requires
agencies to explain the purpose of the
rule. This rule, consistent with the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments, is being proposed to
establish the 2020 commercial shark
fishing quotas, retention limits, and
fishing seasons. Without this rule, the
commercial shark fisheries would close
on December 31, 2019, and would not
open until another action was taken.
This proposed rule would be
implemented according to the
regulations implementing the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments. Thus, NMFS proposes
few, if any, economic impacts to
fishermen other than those already
analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments,
based on the quota adjustments.
Section 603(b)(2) of the RFA requires
agencies to explain the rule’s objectives.
The objectives of this rule are to: Adjust
the base quotas for all shark
management groups based on any
overharvests and/or underharvests from
the previous fishing year(s); establish
the opening dates of the various
management groups; and establish the
retention limits for the blacktip shark,
aggregated large coastal shark, and
hammerhead shark management groups
in order to provide, to the extent
practicable, equitable opportunities
across the fishing management regions
and/or sub-regions while also
considering the ecological needs of the
different shark species.
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires
agencies to provide an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the
rule would apply. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the United States, including
fish harvesters. Provision is made under
SBA’s regulations for an agency to
develop its own industry-specific size
standards after consultation with
Advocacy and an opportunity for public
comment (see 13 CFR 121.903(c)).
Under this provision, NMFS may
establish size standards that differ from
those established by the SBA Office of
Size Standards, but only for use by
NMFS and only for the purpose of
conducting an analysis of economic
effects in fulfillment of the agency’s
obligations under the RFA. To utilize
this provision, NMFS must publish such
size standards in the Federal Register,
which NMFS did on December 29, 2015
(80 FR 81194; 50 CFR 200.2). In this
final rule effective on July 1, 2016,
NMFS established a small business size
standard of $11 million in annual gross
receipts for all businesses in the
commercial fishing industry (NAICS
11411) for RFA compliance purposes.
NMFS considers all HMS permit
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
49243
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
holders to be small entities because they
had average annual receipts of less than
$11 million for commercial fishing.
As of September 2019, the proposed
rule would apply to the approximately
219 directed commercial shark permit
holders, 262 incidental commercial
shark permit holders, 162 smoothhound
shark permit holders, and 106
commercial shark dealers. Not all
permit holders are active in the fishery
in any given year. Active directed
commercial shark permit holders are
defined as those with valid permits that
landed one shark based on HMS
electronic dealer reports. Of the 481
directed and incidental commercial
shark permit holders, only 12 permit
holders landed sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region and only 69 landed
sharks in the Atlantic region. Of the 154
smoothhound shark permit holders,
only 61 permit holders landed
smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic
region and none landed smoothhound
sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region.
NMFS has determined that the proposed
rule would not likely affect any small
governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule does not contain
any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements (5 U.S.C.
603(b)(4)). Similarly, this proposed rule
would not conflict, duplicate, or overlap
with other relevant Federal rules (5
U.S.C. 603(b)(5)). Fishermen, dealers,
and managers in these fisheries must
comply with a number of international
agreements as domestically
implemented, domestic laws, and FMPs.
These include, but are not limited to,
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Atlantic
Tunas Convention Act, the High Seas
Fishing Compliance Act, the Marine
Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered
Species Act, the National
Environmental Policy Act, the
Paperwork Reduction Act, and the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Section 603(c) of the RFA requires
each IRFA to contain a description of
any significant alternatives to the
proposed rule, which would accomplish
the stated objectives of applicable
statutes and minimize any significant
economic impact of the proposed rule
on small entities. Additionally, the RFA
(5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)–(4)) lists four general
categories of significant alternatives that
would assist an agency in the
development of significant alternatives.
These categories of alternatives are: (1)
Establishment of differing compliance
or reporting requirements or timetables
that take into account the resources
available to small entities; (2)
clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance and
reporting requirements under the rule
for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design
standards; and (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule for small entities. In
order to meet the objectives of this
proposed rule, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS cannot
exempt small entities or change the
reporting requirements only for small
entities, because all of the entities
affected are considered small entities. In
addition, there are no alternatives
discussed that fall under the first,
second, and fourth categories described
above. NMFS does not know of any
performance or design standards that
would satisfy the aforementioned
objectives of this rulemaking while,
concurrently, complying with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act; therefore, there
are no alternatives considered under the
third category.
This rulemaking does not establish
management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements
previously adopted and analyzed
measures with adjustments, as specified
in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments and the
Environmental Assessment (EA) that
accompanied the 2011 shark quota
specifications rule (75 FR 76302;
December 8, 2010). Thus, NMFS
proposes to adjust quotas established
and analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments
by subtracting the underharvest or
adding the overharvest as allowable.
Thus, NMFS has limited flexibility to
modify the quotas in this rule, the
impacts of which were analyzed in
previous regulatory flexibility analyses.
Based on the 2018 ex-vessel price
(Table 3), fully harvesting the
unadjusted 2020 Atlantic shark
commercial base quotas could result in
total fleet revenues of $8,775,599. For
the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group, NMFS is proposing
to increase the base sub-regional quotas
due to the underharvests in 2019. The
increase for the western Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark management group could
result in a $232,674 gain in total
revenues for fishermen in that subregion, while the increase for the eastern
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group could result in a
$41,513 gain in total revenues for
fishermen in that sub-region. For the
Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
smoothhound shark management
groups, NMFS is proposing to increase
the base quotas due to the underharvest
in 2019. This would cause a potential
gain in revenue of $262,788 for the fleet
in the Gulf of Mexico region and a
potential gain in revenue of $1,057,482
for the fleet in the Atlantic region.
All of these changes in gross revenues
are similar to the changes in gross
revenues analyzed in the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments. The final regulatory
flexibility analyses for those
amendments concluded that the
economic impacts on these small
entities are expected to be minimal. In
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS
FMP and its amendments and the EA for
the 2011 shark quota specifications rule,
NMFS stated it would be conducting
annual rulemakings and considering the
potential economic impacts of adjusting
the quotas for underharvests and
overharvests at that time.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 3—AVERAGE EX-VESSEL PRICES PER LB DW FOR EACH SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2018
Average
ex-vessel
meat price
Region
Species
Western Gulf of Mexico ...............................
Blacktip Shark ................................................................................
Aggregated LCS ............................................................................
Hammerhead Shark .......................................................................
Blacktip Shark ................................................................................
Aggregated LCS ............................................................................
Hammerhead Shark .......................................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS ......................................................................
Smoothhound Shark ......................................................................
Aggregated LCS ............................................................................
Hammerhead Shark .......................................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS ......................................................................
Eastern Gulf of Mexico ...............................
Gulf of Mexico .............................................
Atlantic .........................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
$0.53
0.67
0.51
1.06
0.59
0.40
0.54
0.65
0.98
0.42
0.99
Average
ex-vessel
fin price
$10.94
11.61
11.12
9.54
11.93
13.20
7.00
........................
11.06
6.66
7.67
49244
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3—AVERAGE EX-VESSEL PRICES PER LB DW FOR EACH SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2018—Continued
Region
No Region ...................................................
Blacknose Shark ............................................................................
Smoothhound Shark ......................................................................
Shark Research Fishery (Aggregated LCS) ..................................
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar only) .......................................
Blue shark ......................................................................................
Porbeagle shark .............................................................................
Other Pelagic sharks .....................................................................
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
For this rule, NMFS also reviewed the
criteria at § 635.27(b)(3) to determine
when opening each fishery would
provide equitable opportunities for
fishermen, to the extent practicable,
while also considering the ecological
needs of the different species. The
opening dates of the fishing season(s)
could vary depending upon the
available annual quota, catch rates, and
number of fishing participants during
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 18, 2019
Average
ex-vessel
meat price
Species
Jkt 247001
the year. For the 2020 fishing year,
NMFS is proposing to open all of the
shark management groups on the
effective date of the final rule for this
action (expected to be on or about
January 1). The direct and indirect
economic impacts would be neutral on
a short- and long-term basis because
NMFS is not proposing to change the
opening dates of these fisheries from the
status quo.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
1.21
0.74
0.81
0.61
0.45
1.18
1.46
Average
ex-vessel
fin price
........................
1.62
11.61
11.00
3.01
3.01
3.01
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
Dated: September 16, 2019.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–20249 Filed 9–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\19SEP1.SGM
19SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49236-49244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20249]
[[Page 49236]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 190913-0027]
RIN 0648-XT004
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2020 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Year
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would adjust quotas and retention limits,
and establish opening dates for the 2020 fishing year for the Atlantic
commercial shark fisheries. Quotas would be adjusted as required or
allowable based on any overharvests and/or underharvests experienced
during the 2019 fishing year. In addition, NMFS proposes opening dates
and commercial retention limits based on adaptive management measures
to provide, to the extent practicable, fishing opportunities for
commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas. The proposed
measures could affect fishing opportunities for commercial shark
fishermen in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico, and
the Caribbean Sea.
DATES: Written comments must be received by October 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2019-0091, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2019-0091, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Guy DuBeck, NMFS/SF1,
1315 East-West Highway, National Marine Fisheries Service, SSMC3,
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Copies of this proposed rule and supporting documents are available
from the HMS Management Division website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/atlantic-highly-migratory-species or by
contacting Guy DuBeck by phone at 301-427-8503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guy DuBeck or Karyl Brewster-Geisz at
301-427-8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and its
amendments are implemented by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For the
Atlantic commercial shark fisheries, the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments established commercial shark retention limits,
commercial quotas for species and management groups, and accounting
measures for underharvests and overharvests for the shark fisheries.
The FMP also includes adaptive management measures, such as flexible
opening dates for the fishing year and inseason adjustments to shark
trip limits, which provide management flexibility in furtherance of
equitable fishing opportunities, to the extent practicable, for
commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas.
2020 Proposed Commercial Shark Quotas
This proposed rule would adjust the quota levels for the different
shark stocks and management groups for the 2019 Atlantic commercial
shark fishing year based on overharvests and underharvests that
occurred during the 2019 fishing year, consistent with existing
regulations at 50 CFR 635.27(b). Overharvests and underharvests are
accounted for in the same region, sub-region, and/or fishery in which
they occurred the following year, except that large overharvests may be
spread over a number of subsequent fishing years up to a maximum of
five years. Shark stocks that are overfished, have overfishing
occurring, or have an unknown status, as well as management groups that
contain one or more stocks that are overfished, have overfishing
occurring, or have an unknown stock status, will not have underharvest
carried over in the following year. Stocks or management groups that
are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring may have any
underharvest carried over in the following year, up to 50 percent of
the base annual quota.
Based on 2019 harvests to date, and after considering catch rates
and landings from previous years, NMFS proposes to adjust the 2020
quotas for certain management groups as shown in Table 1. In the final
rule, any adjustments to the quotas will be based on how the quotas are
affected by new data from dealer reports received by late October to
mid-November 2019. Thus, all of the 2020 proposed quotas for the
respective stocks and management groups will be subject to further
adjustment after NMFS considers the dealer reports through late October
to mid-November. NMFS anticipates that all dealer reports that are
received after the late October to mid-November date will be used to
adjust 2021 quotas, as appropriate.
Because the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group and
smoothhound shark management groups in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
regions are not overfished, and overfishing is not occurring, available
underharvest (up to 50 percent of the base annual quota) from the 2019
fishing year for these management groups may be applied to the
respective 2020 quotas. NMFS proposes to account for any underharvest
of Gulf of Mexico blacktip sharks by dividing underharvest between the
eastern and western Gulf of Mexico sub-regional quotas based on the
sub-regional quota split percentage implemented in Amendment 6 to the
2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR 50073; August 18, 2015).
For the sandbar shark, aggregated large coastal shark (LCS),
hammerhead shark, non-blacknose small coastal shark (SCS), blacknose
shark, blue shark, porbeagle shark, and pelagic shark (other than
porbeagle or blue sharks) management groups, the 2019 underharvests
cannot be carried over to the 2020 fishing year because those stocks or
management groups are overfished, are experiencing overfishing, or have
an unknown status. There also were no overharvests in these management
groups. Thus, NMFS proposes that quotas for these management groups be
equal to the annual base quota without adjustment, although the final
quotas will be based
[[Page 49237]]
on current data at the time the final rule is prepared.
The proposed 2020 quotas by species and management group are
summarized in Table 1; the description of the calculations for each
stock and management group can be found below.
Table 1--2020 Proposed Quotas and Opening Dates for the Atlantic Shark Management Groups
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. Table includes landings data as of September 13,
2019; final quotas are subject to change based on landings as of late October to mid-November 2019. 1 mt = 2,204.6 lb]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary
Region or sub-region Management group 2019 annual 2019 landings Adjustments \2\ 2020 base 2020 proposed Season opening
quota \1\ annual quota annual quota dates
(A)............ (B)............ (C)............ (D)............ (D + C)........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Gulf of Mexico....... Blacktip Sharks 250.8 mt dw 62.2 mt dw 127.9 mt dw 231 mt dw 358.9 mt dw January 1, 2020.
\3\. (552,919 lb (137,118 lb (281,899.8 lb (510,261 lb (792,161 lb
dw)\5\. dw). dw). dw). dw).
Aggregated \4\ 22.0 mt dw 11.7 mt dw ............... 72.0 mt dw 72.0 mt dw
Large Coastal (48,501 lb dw) (25,805 lb dw). (158,724 lb (158,724 lb
Sharks. \5\. dw). dw).
Hammerhead 3.9 mt dw <0.5 mt dw ............... 11.9 mt dw 11.9 mt dw
Sharks. (8,598 lb dw) (<1,300 lb dw). (26,301 lb dw). (26,301 lb dw).
\5\.
Eastern Gulf of Mexico....... Blacktip Sharks 32.7 mt dw 7.2 mt dw 13.9 mt dw 25.1 mt dw 39.0 mt dw January 1, 2020.
\3\. (72,091 lb dw) (15,778 lb dw). (30,627.7 lb (55,439 lb dw). (86,066.7 lb
\5\. dw). dw).
Aggregated Large 135.5 mt dw 61.3 mt dw ............... 85.5 mt dw 85.5 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (298,726 lb (135,227 lb (188,593 lb (188,593 lb
dw) \5\. dw). dw). dw).
Hammerhead 21.4 mt dw 9.2 mt dw ............... 13.4 mt dw 13.4 mt dw
Sharks. (47,178 lb dw) (20,353 lb dw). (29,421 lb dw). (29,421 lb dw).
\5\.
Gulf of Mexico............... Non-Blacknose 112.6 mt dw 34.5 mt dw ............... 112.6 mt dw 112.6 mt dw
Small Coastal (248,215 lb (76,027 lb dw). (248,215 lb (248,215 lb
Sharks. dw). dw). dw).
Smoothhound 504.6 mt dw <5.0 mt dw 168.2 mt dw 336.4 mt dw 504.6 mt dw
Sharks. (1,112,441 lb (<11,000 lb (370,814 lb (741,627 lb (1,112,441 lb
dw). dw). dw). dw). dw).
Atlantic..................... Aggregated Large 168.9 mt dw 34.5 mt dw ............... 168.9 mt dw 168.9 mt dw January 1, 2020.
Coastal Sharks. (372,552 lb (76,011 lb dw). (372,552 lb (372,552 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Hammerhead 27.1 mt dw 9.3 mt dw ............... 27.1 mt dw 27.1 mt dw
Sharks. (59,736 lb dw). (20,479 lb dw). (59,736 lb dw). (59,736 lb dw).
Non-Blacknose 264.1 mt dw 83.8 mt dw ............... 264.1 mt dw 264.1 mt dw
Small Coastal (582,333 lb (184,735 lb (582,333 lb (582,333 lb
Sharks. dw). dw). dw). dw).
Blacknose Sharks 17.2 mt dw 7.9 mt dw ............... 17.2 mt dw 17.2 mt dw
(South of (37,921 lb dw). 17,431 lb dw. (37,921 lb dw). (37,921 lb dw).
34[deg] N lat.
only).
Smoothhound 1,802.6 mt dw 279.6 mt dw 600.9 mt dw 1,201.7 mt dw 1,802.6 mt dw
Sharks. (3,973,902 lb (616,326 lb (1,324,634 lb (2,649,268 lb (3,971,587 lb
dw). dw). dw). dw). dw).
No regional quotas........... Non-Sandbar LCS 50.0 mt dw 10.1 mt dw ............... 50.0 mt dw 50.0 mt dw January 1, 2020.
Research. (110,230 lb (22,195 lb dw). (110,230 lb (110,230 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Sandbar Shark 90.7 mt dw 50.6 mt dw ............... 90.7 mt dw 90.7 mt dw
Research. (199,943 lb (111,542 lb (199,943 lb (199,943 lb
dw). dw). dw). dw).
Blue Sharks..... 273.0 mt dw 0 mt dw (0 lb ............... 273.0 mt dw 273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb dw). (601,856 lb (601,856 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Porbeagle Sharks 1.7 mt dw <0.5 mt dw ............... 1.7 mt dw 1.7 mt dw
(3,748 lb dw). (<1,000 lb dw). (3,748 lb dw). (3,748 lb dw).
Pelagic Sharks 488.0 mt dw 28.6 mt dw ............... 488.0 mt dw 488.0 mt dw
Other Than (1,075,856 lb (63,006 lb dw). (1,075,856 lb (1,075,856 lb
Porbeagle or dw). dw). dw).
Blue.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Landings are from January 1, 2019, through September 13, 2019, and are subject to change.
\2\ Underharvest adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring. Also, the
underharvest adjustments cannot exceed 50 percent of the base annual quota.
\3\ This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2019. This proposed rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 141.8 mt dw
(281,899.8 lb dw). Since any underharvest would be divided based on the sub-regional quota percentage split, the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
quota would be increased by 127 mt dw, or 90.2 percent of the underharvest, while the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota would be increased
by 13.9 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the underharvest.
\4\ While the western Gulf of Mexico Aggregated LCS quota was still under the limit when the 2019 final rule was released, the quota was exceeded by the
end of the year. However, current landings are at 11 percent of the available 2019 quota and current catch rates do not indicate the quota will be
fully landed. This underharvest (62.3 mt dw) is much greater than the 2018 overharvest (8.0 mt dw; 17,548 lb dw lb dw). Therefore, NMFS is proposing
that the 2019 quota be adjusted to account for the 2018 overharvest, and the 2020 quota be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment.
\5\ NMFS transferred 5 mt dw of the blacktip shark quota, 50 mt dw of the aggregated LCS quota, and 8 mt dw of the hammerhead shark quota from the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region to the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region on September 12, 2019.
1. Proposed 2020 Quotas for the Gulf of Mexico Region Shark Management
Groups
In a recent action, NMFS transferred 5 mt dw of the blacktip shark
quota, 50 mt dw of the aggregated LCS quota, and 8 mt dw of the
hammerhead shark quota from the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region to
the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region on September 12, 2019. This quota
transfer would not impact the proposed actions in this rulemaking. The
2020 proposed commercial quota for blacktip sharks in the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region is 358.9 mt dw (792,161lb dw) and the eastern Gulf
of Mexico sub-region is 39.0 mt dw (86,066.7 lb dw; Table 1). As of
September 13, 2019, preliminary reported landings for blacktip sharks
in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 25 percent (62.2 mt
dw) of their 2019 quota levels (250.8 mt dw), and blacktip sharks in
the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 22 percent (7.2 mt dw) of
their 2019 quota levels (32.7 mt dw). Reported landings in both sub-
regions have not exceeded the 2019 quota to date, and blacktip shark
landings in both sub-regions are lower than usual. Gulf of Mexico
blacktip sharks have not been declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an unknown status. Pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for blacktip sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico region therefore may be applied to the 2019 quotas, up to 50
percent of the base annual quota. Additionally, any underharvest would
be divided between the two sub-regions, based on the percentages that
are allocated to each sub-region, which are set forth in Sec.
635.27(b)(1)(ii)(C). To date, the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group is underharvested by 214.1 mt dw (472,114 lb dw).
Accordingly, NMFS proposed to increase the western Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark quota by 127.9 mt dw or 90.2 percent of the
underharvest, while the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark sub-
regional quota would increase by 13.9 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the
underharvest (Table 1). Thus, the proposed western sub-regional Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark commercial quota is 358.9 mt dw (792,161 lb dw),
and the proposed eastern sub-regional Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
commercial quota is 39.0 mt dw (86,066.7 lb dw).
The 2020 proposed commercial quota for aggregated LCS in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 72.0 mt dw (141,176 lb dw), and
the eastern Gulf of
[[Page 49238]]
Mexico sub-region is 85.5 mt dw (188,593 lb dw; Table 1). As of
September 13, 2019, preliminary reported landings for aggregated LCS in
the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 53 percent (11.7 mt dw)
of the 2019 quota (22.0 mt dw), while the aggregated LCS in the eastern
Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 45 percent (61.3 mt dw) of their 2019
quota levels (135.5 mt dw). NMFS is proposing to adjust the 2019
aggregated LCS quota in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region to
account for an 8 mt dw overharvest that occurred in 2018. While the
quota was still under the limit when the 2019 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Year final rule was released (83 FR 60777; November 27, 2018),
the quota was exceeded by the end of the 2019 calendar year, as later
revealed by updated data received in 2019. Although NMFS generally
accounts for later-reported overages in the subsequent year (here,
2020), NMFS has, under certain circumstances, re-adjusted the subject
year quota if appropriate. Given that 2019 landings are low, current
catch rates indicate that the 2019 quota will not be fully landed, and
that there is time to further adjust this approach, if needed, in the
final rule in response to any updated landings information. NMFS is
proposing that the 2019 sub-regional quota be adjusted to account for
the 2018 overharvest, and is proposing that the 2020 quota for the
aggregated LCS in the western Gulf of Mexico be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment. NMFS proposes to re-adjust the western
Gulf of Mexico sub-regional quota by 8 mt dw (17,548 lb dw) from the
2019 quota. If catch rates do increase, and the revised 2019 sub-
regional quota is exceeded, then NMFS would, in the final rule, reduce
the 2020 quota by that overharvest. Based on preliminary estimates and
catch rates from previous years, and consistent with the current
regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2020 quota
for aggregated LCS in the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region be equal to
the annual base quota without adjustment, because the overall regional
quota has not been overharvested and because underharvests cannot be
carried over due to stock status.
The 2020 proposed commercial quotas for hammerhead sharks in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region and western Gulf of Mexico sub-region
are 11.9 mt dw (26,301 lb dw) and 13.4 mt dw (29,421 lb dw),
respectively (Table 1). As of September 13, 2019, preliminary reported
landings for hammerhead sharks in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region
were less than 12 percent (<0.5 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels (3.9
mt dw), while landings of hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region were at 43 percent (9.2 mt dw) of their 2019 quota
levels (21.4 mt dw). Reported landings from both Gulf of Mexico and
Atlantic regions have not exceeded the 2019 overall hammerhead quota to
date. Given the overfished status of the scalloped hammerhead shark,
the hammerhead shark quota cannot be adjusted for any underharvests.
Therefore, based on both preliminary estimates and catch rates from
previous years and the fact that the 2019 overall hammerhead shark
quota has not been overharvested to date, and consistent with the
current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), NMFS proposes that the
2020 quotas for hammerhead sharks in the western Gulf of Mexico and
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-regions be equal to their annual base quotas
without adjustment.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Gulf of Mexico region is 112.6 mt dw (248,215 lb dw). As of September
13, 2019, preliminary reported landings of non-blacknose SCS were at 31
percent (34.5 mt dw) of their 2019 quota level (112.6 mt dw) in the
Gulf of Mexico region. Reported landings have not exceeded the 2019
quota to date. Given the unknown status of bonnethead sharks within the
Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS management group, underharvests cannot
be carried forward, pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Under current
regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), underharvests cannot be carried over
due to stock status. Based on both preliminary estimates and catch
rates from previous years, and because there have not been any
overharvests, NMFS proposes that the 2020 quota for non-blacknose SCS
in the Gulf of Mexico region be equal to the annual base quota without
adjustment. There is no allowable harvest of blacknose sharks in the
Gulf of Mexico region.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota for smoothhound sharks in the
Gulf of Mexico region is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441 lb dw). As of September
13, 2019, preliminary reported landings of smoothhound sharks were less
than 5 percent (<4.9 mt dw) in the Gulf of Mexico region. Gulf of
Mexico smoothhound sharks have not been declared to be overfished, to
have overfishing occurring, or to have an unknown status. Pursuant to
Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for smoothhound sharks within the
Gulf of Mexico region therefore could be applied to the 2020 quotas up
to 50 percent of the base annual quota. Accordingly, NMFS proposes to
increase the 2020 Gulf of Mexico smoothhound shark quota to adjust for
anticipated underharvests in 2019 as allowed. The proposed 2020
adjusted base annual quota for Gulf of Mexico smoothhound sharks is
504.6 mt dw (336.4 mt dw) annual base quota + 168.2 mt dw 2019
underharvest = 504.6 mt dw 2020 adjusted annual quota).
2. Proposed 2020 Quotas for the Atlantic Region Shark Management Groups
The 2020 proposed commercial quota for aggregated LCS in the
Atlantic region is 168.9 mt dw (372,552 lb dw). As of September 13,
2019, the aggregated LCS fishery in the Atlantic region is still open,
and preliminary landings indicate that only 20 percent of the quota, or
34.5 mt dw, has been harvested. Given the unknown status of some of the
shark species within the Atlantic aggregated LCS management group,
underharvests cannot be carried over pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on both preliminary estimates and
catch rates from previous years, and consistent with current
regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2020 quota
for aggregated LCS in the Atlantic region be equal to the annual base
quota without adjustment, because there have not been any overharvests,
and underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.ey End:?>
The 2020 proposed commercial quota for hammerhead sharks in the
Atlantic region is 27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb dw). Currently, the hammerhead
shark fishery in the Atlantic region is still open and preliminary
landings as of September 13, 2019, indicate that 34 percent of the
Atlantic regional quota, or 9.3 mt dw, has been harvested. Reported
landings from both Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic regions have not
exceeded the 2019 overall hammerhead quota to date. Given the
overfished status of hammerhead sharks, underharvests cannot be carried
forward pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on both
preliminary estimates and catch rates from previous years, and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2020 quota for hammerhead sharks in the Atlantic
region be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment, because
the overall hammerhead shark quota has not been overharvested, and
because underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Atlantic region is 264.1 mt dw (582,333 lb dw). As of September 13,
2019, preliminary reported landings of non-blacknose SCS
[[Page 49239]]
were at 32 percent (83.8 mt dw) of their 2019 quota level in the
Atlantic region. Reported landings have not exceeded the 2019 quota to
date. Given the unknown status of bonnethead sharks within the Atlantic
non-blacknose SCS management group, underharvests cannot be carried
forward pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates of catch rates from previous years, and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2020 quota for non-blacknose SCS in the Atlantic
region be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests, and because underharvests cannot
be carried over due to stock status.
The 2019 proposed commercial quota for blacknose sharks in the
Atlantic region is 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw). This quota is available
in the Atlantic region only for those vessels operating south of
34[deg] N latitude. North of 34[deg] N latitude, retention, landing, or
sale of blacknose sharks is prohibited. As of September 13, 2019,
preliminary reported landings of blacknose sharks were at 46 percent
(7.9 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels in the Atlantic region. Reported
landings have not exceeded the 2019 quota to date. Pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2), because blacknose sharks have been declared to be
overfished with overfishing occurring in the Atlantic region, NMFS
could not carry forward the remaining underharvest. Therefore, NMFS
proposes that the 2020 Atlantic blacknose shark quota be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment.
The 2020 proposed commercial quota for smoothhound sharks in the
Atlantic region is 1,802.6 mt dw (3,973,902 lb dw). As of September 13,
2019, preliminary reported landings of smoothhound sharks were at 16
percent (279.6 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels in the Atlantic
region. Atlantic smoothhound sharks have not been declared to be
overfished, to have overfishing occurring, or to have an unknown
status. Pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Atlantic region therefore could be
applied to the 2020 quotas up to 50 percent of the base annual quota.
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to increase the 2020 Atlantic smoothhound
shark quota to adjust for anticipated underharvests in 2019 as allowed.
The proposed 2020 adjusted base annual quota for Atlantic smoothhound
sharks is 1,802.6 mt dw (1,201.7 mt dw annual base quota + 600.9 mt dw
2019 underharvest = 1,802.6 mt dw 2020 adjusted annual quota).
3. Proposed 2020 Quotas for Shark Management Groups With No Regional
Quotas
The 2020 proposed commercial quotas within the shark research
fishery are 50 mt dw (110,230 lb dw) for research LCS and 90.7 mt dw
(199,943 lb dw) for sandbar sharks. Within the shark research fishery,
as of September 13, 2019, preliminary reported landings of research LCS
were at 20 percent (10.1 mt dw) of their 2019 quota levels, and sandbar
shark reported landings were at 56 percent (50.6 mt dw) of their 2019
quota levels. Reported landings have not exceeded the 2019 quotas to
date. Under Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), because sandbar sharks and
scalloped hammerhead sharks within the research LCS management group
are either not overfished or overfishing is not occurring,
underharvests for these management groups cannot be carried forward to
the 2020 quotas. Therefore, based on preliminary estimates, and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2020 quota in the shark research fishery be equal to
the annual base quota without adjustment because there have not been
any overharvests, and because underharvests cannot be carried over due
to stock status.
The 2020 proposed commercial quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle
sharks, and pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle or blue sharks) are
273.0 mt dw (601,856 lb dw), 1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb dw), and 488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb dw), respectively. As of September 13, 2019, there were
no preliminary reported landings of blue sharks, porbeagle shark
reported landings were at <33 percent (<0.5 mt dw) of their 2019 quota
levels, and landings of pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle and blue
sharks) were at 6 percent (28.6 mt dw) of their 2019 quota level (488.0
mt dw). Given that these pelagic species are overfished, have
overfishing occurring, or have an unknown status, underharvests cannot
be carried forward pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based
on preliminary estimates and consistent with the current regulations at
Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2020 quotas for blue sharks,
porbeagle sharks, and pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle and blue
sharks) be equal to their annual base quotas without adjustment,
because there have not been any overharvests and because underharvests
cannot be carried over due to stock status.
4. Proposed Opening Dates and Retention Limits for the 2020 Atlantic
Commercial Shark Fishing Year
For each fishery, NMFS considered the seven ``Opening Commercial
Fishing Season Criteria'' listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3). The criteria
includes factors such as the available annual quotas for the current
fishing season, estimated season length and average weekly catch rates
from previous years, length of the season and fishery participation in
past years, impacts to accomplishing objectives of the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments, temporal variation in
behavior or biology of target species (e.g., seasonal distribution or
abundance), impact of catch rates in one region on another, and effects
of delayed openings.
NMFS applied the Opening Commercial Fishing Season Criteria by
examining the overharvests and underharvests of the different
management groups in the 2019 fishing year to determine the likely
effects of the proposed commercial quotas for 2020 on shark stocks and
fishermen across regional and sub-regional fishing areas. NMFS also
examined the potential season length and previous catch rates to
ensure, to the extent practicable, that equitable fishing opportunities
be provided to fishermen in all areas. Lastly, NMFS examined the
seasonal variation of the different species/management groups and the
effects on fishing opportunities.
NMFS also considered the six ``inseason trip limit adjustment
criteria'' listed at Sec. 635.24(a)(8) for directed shark limited
access permit holders intending to land LCS other than sandbar sharks.
Those criteria are: The amount of remaining shark quota in the relevant
area or region, to date, based on dealer reports; the catch rates of
the relevant shark species/complexes, to date, based on dealer reports;
the estimated date of fishery closure based on when the landings are
projected to reach 80-percent of the available overall, regional, and/
or sub-regional quota, if the fishery's landings are not projected to
reach 100 percent of the applicable quota before the end of the season,
or when the season of a quota-linked management group is closed;
effects of the adjustment on accomplishing the objectives of the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments; variations in
seasonal distribution, abundance, or migratory patterns of the relevant
shark species based on scientific and fishery-based knowledge; and/or
effects of catch rates in one part of a region precluding vessels in
another part of that region from having a
[[Page 49240]]
reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the relevant quota.
After considering all these criteria, NMFS is proposing to open the
2020 Atlantic commercial shark fishing season for all shark management
groups in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico
and the Caribbean Sea, on or about January 1, 2020, after the
publication of the final rule for this action (Table 2). NMFS is also
proposing to start the 2020 commercial shark fishing season with the
commercial retention limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip in both the eastern and western Gulf of Mexico sub-
regions, and a commercial retention limit of 25 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip in the Atlantic region (Table 2). NMFS will
consider public comments received during the current year and catch
rates from this year. Any retention limits that are proposed could
change as a result of public comments as well as catch rates and
landings information based on updated data available when drafting the
final rule.
Table 2--Quota Linkages, Season Opening Dates, and Commercial Retention Limit by Regional or Sub-Regional Shark
Management Group
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial retention
limits for directed
Season opening shark limited access
Region or sub-region Management group Quota linkages dates permit holders
(inseason adjustments
are possible)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Gulf of Mexico......... Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... January 1, 2020.. 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip.
Aggregated Large Linked...........
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Eastern Gulf of Mexico......... Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... January 1, 2020.. 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip. \1\
Aggregated Large Linked...........
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Gulf of Mexico................. Non-Blacknose Not Linked....... January 1, 2020.. N/A.
Small Coastal
Sharks.
Smoothhound Not Linked....... January 1, 2020.. N/A.
Sharks.
Atlantic....................... Aggregated Large Linked........... January 1, 2020.. 25 LCS other than
Coastal Sharks. sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip.
Hammerhead Sharks ................. ................. If quota is landed
quickly (e.g., if
approximately 20
percent of quota is
caught at the
beginning of the
year), NMFS
anticipates an
inseason reduction
(e.g., to 3 or fewer
LCS other than
sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip),
then an inseason
increase to 36 LCS
other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per
trip around July 15,
2020. \2\
Non-Blacknose Linked (South of January 1, 2020.. N/A.
Small Coastal 34[deg] N lat.
Sharks. only).
Blacknose Sharks ................. ................. 8 Blacknose sharks per
(South of vessel per trip
34[deg] N lat. (applies to directed
only). and incidental permit
holders).
Smoothhound Not Linked....... January 1, 2020.. N/A.
Sharks.
No regional quotas............. Non-Sandbar LCS Linked........... January 1, 2020.. N/A.
Research.
Sandbar Shark
Research.
Blue Sharks...... Not Linked....... January 1, 2020.. N/A.
Porbeagle Sharks.
Pelagic Sharks
Other Than
Porbeagle or
Blue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NMFS may consider a higher starting retention limit for the entire region of 55 sharks per trip to increase
the harvest level and ensure the management group can maximize its quota. NMFS is asking for comments
specifically on this potential increase in retention limits.
\2\ NMFS is proposing changing the percent of quota harvested at which it considers adjusting the retention
limit. Rather than 20 percent, NMFS would consider adjustment at a higher percentage to allow fishermen in the
Atlantic region to more fully utilize the quota. NMFS is asking for comment specifically on this potential
change in the benchmark (percent of quota harvested) at which NMFS considers an inseason adjustment.
Additionally, NMFS is also considering an increase from the initial 25 sharks per trip in the beginning of the
fishing year to a higher number of landings per trip, within the 55 sharks per trip limit. NMFS is
specifically asking for comments on these potential changes.
In the Gulf of Mexico region, NMFS proposes opening the fishing
season on or about January 1, 2020, for the aggregated LCS, blacktip
sharks, and hammerhead shark management groups with the commercial
retention limits of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip for directed shark permit holders in the eastern and western sub-
region. This opening date and retention limit combination would
provide, to the extent practicable, equitable opportunities across the
fisheries management sub-regions. This opening date takes into account
all the season opening criteria listed in Sec. 635.27(b)(3), and
particularly the criteria that requires NMFS to consider the length of
the season for the different species and/or management group in the
previous years (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)) and whether fishermen
were able to participate in the fishery in those years (Sec.
635.27(b)(3)(v)). The proposed
[[Page 49241]]
commercial retention limits take into account the criteria listed in
Sec. 635.24(a)(8), and particularly the criterion that requires NMFS
to consider the catch rates of the relevant shark species/complexes
based on dealer reports to date (Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(ii)). NMFS may also
adjust the retention limit in the Gulf of Mexico region throughout the
season to ensure fishermen in all parts of the region have an
opportunity to harvest aggregated LCS, blacktip sharks, and hammerhead
sharks (see the criteria listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v) and Sec.
635.24(a)(8)(ii), (v), and (vi)). For both the eastern and western Gulf
of Mexico sub-regions combined, dealer reports received through
September 13, 2019, indicate that 24 percent (69.4 mt dw), 46 percent
(73.0 mt dw), and less than 40 percent (<10.0 mt dw) of the available
blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark quotas, respectively,
has been harvested. Therefore, for 2020, NMFS is considering opening
the both the western and eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-regions at 45
sharks per trip, but may also consider a higher starting retention
limit for the entire region of 55 sharks per trip to increase the
harvest level and ensure the management group can maximize its quota.
NMFS is asking for comments specifically on this potential increase in
retention limits.
In the Atlantic region, NMFS proposes opening the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management groups on or about January 1, 2020.
This opening date is the same date that these management groups opened
in 2019. As described below, this opening date also takes into account
all the criteria listed in Sec. 635.27(b)(3), and particularly the
criterion that NMFS consider the effects of catch rates in one part of
a region precluding vessels in another part of that region from having
a reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the different species
and/or management quotas (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The 2019 data
indicates that an opening date of January 1, coupled with inseason
adjustments to the retention limit, provided a reasonable opportunity
for fishermen in every part of each region to harvest a portion of the
available quotas (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(i)) while accounting for
variations in seasonal distribution of the different species in the
management groups (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(iv)). In 2019, when the
aggregated LCS quota was harvested too quickly, NMFS reduced the
retention limit to three sharks per trip (April 2, 2019; 84 FR 12524)
to allow fishermen in the North Atlantic an opportunity to fish later
in the year when sharks are available in the North Atlantic area (see
the criteria at Sec. 635.24(a)(3)(i), (ii), (v), and (vi)). NMFS then
increased the retention limit to 36 sharks per trip on June 25, 2019
(84 FR 29808), to increase fishing opportunities for all fishermen
across the Atlantic region. Because the quotas we propose for 2020 are
the same as the quotas in 2019, NMFS proposes that the season lengths
and therefore the participation of various fishermen throughout the
region, would be similar in 2020 (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)).
Based on the recent performance of the fishery, the January 1 opening
date appears to meet the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic
HMS FMP and its amendments (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(vi)). However, after
reviewing landings data from 2016 to the present, NMFS has seen a
decrease in landings over time in the aggregated LCS management group.
Because of the decrease in landings, NMFS is also proposing changing
the percent of quotas harvested at which it considers adjusting the
retention limit. Rather than 20 percent, NMFS would consider
adjustments at a higher percentage to allow fishermen in the Atlantic
region to more fully utilize the quota. While this is not a regulatory
provision, it is a management benchmark NMFS has used (and announced as
part of the rulemaking process) in previous seasons to help determine
at which point it will consider an inseason action to adjust the
retention limits. NMFS is asking for comment specifically on this
potential change in the benchmark (percent of quota harvested) at which
NMFS considers an inseason adjustment.
In addition, for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management
groups in the Atlantic region, NMFS proposes opening the fishing year
with the commercial retention limit for directed shark limited access
permit holders of 25 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip.
This retention limit should allow fishermen to harvest some of the 2020
quota at the beginning of the year when sharks are more prevalent in
the South Atlantic area (see the criteria at Sec. 635.24(a)(3)(i),
(ii), (v), and (vi)). As was done in 2019, if it appears that the quota
is being harvested too quickly to allow directed fishermen throughout
the entire region an opportunity to fish and ensure enough quota
remains until later in the year, NMFS would reduce the commercial
retention limits to incidental levels (3 LCS other than sandbar sharks
per vessel per trip) or another level calculated to reduce the harvest
of LCS taking into account Sec. 635.27(b)(3) and the inseason trip
limit adjustment criteria listed in Sec. 635.24(a)(8). If the quota
continues to be harvested quickly, NMFS could reduce the retention
limit to 0 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip to ensure
enough quota remains until later in the year. If either situation
occurs, NMFS would publish in the Federal Register notification of any
inseason adjustments of the retention limit to an appropriate limit of
sharks per trip. NMFS will consider increasing the commercial retention
limits per trip at a later date, if necessary, to provide fishermen in
the northern portion of the Atlantic region an opportunity to retain
aggregated LCS and hammerhead sharks after considering the appropriate
inseason adjustment criteria. Similarly, at some point later in the
year, NMFS may consider increasing the retention limit to 36 LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip or another amount, as deemed
appropriate, after considering the inseason trip limit adjustment
criteria. If the quota is being harvested too quickly or too slowly,
NMFS could adjust the retention limit appropriately to ensure the
fishery remains open most of the rest of the year. However, as stated
above, NMFS has noticed a decrease in annual landings from 2016 to
present. As such, in addition to the proposed change to the percent of
quota harvested, NMFS is also considering an increase from the initial
25 sharks per trip in the beginning of the fishing year to a higher
number of landings per trip, within the 55 sharks per trip limit.
Changes to either the percent of quota harvested or the initial
retention limit (or both) could allow fishermen in the Atlantic region
to more fully utilize the quota. NMFS is specifically asking for
comments on these potential changes.
All of the shark management groups would remain open until December
31, 2020, or until NMFS determines that the landings for any shark
management group have reached, or are projected to reach, 80-percent of
the available overall, regional, and/or sub-regional quota, if the
fishery's landings are not projected to reach 100 percent of the
applicable quota before the end of the season, or when the quota-linked
management group is closed. If NMFS determines that a non-linked shark
species or management group must be closed, then, consistent with Sec.
635.28(b)(2) for non-linked quotas (e.g., eastern Gulf of Mexico
blacktip, western Gulf of Mexico blacktip, Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose
SCS, pelagic sharks, or the Atlantic or Gulf of Mexico smoothhound
sharks), NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a notice of closure
for that shark species, shark
[[Page 49242]]
management group, region, and/or sub-region that will be effective no
fewer than four days from the date of filing (83 FR 31677; July 9,
2018). For the blacktip shark management group, regulations at Sec.
635.28(b)(5)(i) through (v) authorize NMFS to close the management
group before landings reach, or are expected to reach, 80-percent of
the available overall, regional, and/or sub-regional quota, after
considering the following criteria and other relevant factors: Season
length based on available sub-regional quota and average sub-regional
catch rates; variability in regional and/or sub-regional seasonal
distribution, abundance, and migratory patterns; effects on
accomplishing the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments; amount of remaining shark quotas in the relevant
sub-region; and regional and/or sub-regional catch rates of the
relevant shark species or management groups. From the effective date
and time of the closure until NMFS announces, via the publication of a
notice in the Federal Register, that additional quota is available and
the season is reopened, the fisheries for the shark species or
management group are closed, even across fishing years.
If NMFS determines that a linked shark species or management group
must be closed, then, consistent with Sec. 635.28(b)(3) for linked
quotas and the Final Rule to Revise Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
Shark Fishery Closure Regulations (83 FR 31677; July 9, 2018), NMFS
will publish in the Federal Register a notice of closure for all of the
species and/or management groups in a linked group that will be
effective no fewer than four days from date of filing. In that event,
from the effective date and time of the closure until NMFS announces,
via the publication of a notice in the Federal Register, that
additional quota is available and the season is reopened, the fisheries
for all linked species and/or management groups will be closed, even
across fishing years. The linked quotas of the species and/or
management groups are Atlantic hammerhead sharks and Atlantic
aggregated LCS; eastern Gulf of Mexico hammerhead sharks and eastern
Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS; western Gulf of Mexico hammerhead sharks
and western Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS; and Atlantic blacknose and
Atlantic non-blacknose SCS south of 34[deg] N latitude.
Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may be submitted via
www.regulations.gov or by mail. NMFS solicits comments on this proposed
rule by October 10, 2019 (see DATES and ADDRESSES). As noted above,
NMFS is specifically asking for comments on three distinct issues--the
initial LCS retention limit in the Gulf of Mexico region, the level of
landings at which NMFS considers adjusting the retention limit for the
Atlantic region, and the initial LCS retention limit in the Atlantic
region.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that the proposed
rule is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its
amendments, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject
to further consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
NMFS determined that the final rules to implement Amendment 2 to
the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (June 24, 2008, 73 FR 35778;
corrected on July 15, 2008, 73 FR 40658), Amendment 5a to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (78 FR 40318; July 3, 2013), Amendment 6
to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR 50073; August 18,
2015), and Amendment 9 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (80 FR
73128; November 24, 2015) are consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies of the approved coastal
management program of coastal states on the Atlantic including the Gulf
of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea as required under the Coastal Zone
Management Act. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.41(a), NMFS provided the Coastal
Zone Management Program of each coastal state a 60-day period to review
the consistency determination and to advise NMFS of their concurrence.
NMFS received concurrence with the consistency determinations from
several states and inferred consistency from those states that did not
respond within the 60-day time period. This proposed action to
establish opening dates and adjust quotas for the 2020 fishing year for
the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries does not change the framework
previously consulted upon. Therefore, no additional consultation is
required.
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. The IRFA analysis follows.
Section 603(b)(1) of the RFA requires agencies to explain the
purpose of the rule. This rule, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments, is
being proposed to establish the 2020 commercial shark fishing quotas,
retention limits, and fishing seasons. Without this rule, the
commercial shark fisheries would close on December 31, 2019, and would
not open until another action was taken. This proposed rule would be
implemented according to the regulations implementing the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments. Thus, NMFS proposes
few, if any, economic impacts to fishermen other than those already
analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments,
based on the quota adjustments.
Section 603(b)(2) of the RFA requires agencies to explain the
rule's objectives. The objectives of this rule are to: Adjust the base
quotas for all shark management groups based on any overharvests and/or
underharvests from the previous fishing year(s); establish the opening
dates of the various management groups; and establish the retention
limits for the blacktip shark, aggregated large coastal shark, and
hammerhead shark management groups in order to provide, to the extent
practicable, equitable opportunities across the fishing management
regions and/or sub-regions while also considering the ecological needs
of the different shark species.
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires agencies to provide an
estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule would apply.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria
for all major industry sectors in the United States, including fish
harvesters. Provision is made under SBA's regulations for an agency to
develop its own industry-specific size standards after consultation
with Advocacy and an opportunity for public comment (see 13 CFR
121.903(c)). Under this provision, NMFS may establish size standards
that differ from those established by the SBA Office of Size Standards,
but only for use by NMFS and only for the purpose of conducting an
analysis of economic effects in fulfillment of the agency's obligations
under the RFA. To utilize this provision, NMFS must publish such size
standards in the Federal Register, which NMFS did on December 29, 2015
(80 FR 81194; 50 CFR 200.2). In this final rule effective on July 1,
2016, NMFS established a small business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts for all businesses in the commercial fishing
industry (NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance purposes. NMFS considers all
HMS permit
[[Page 49243]]
holders to be small entities because they had average annual receipts
of less than $11 million for commercial fishing.
As of September 2019, the proposed rule would apply to the
approximately 219 directed commercial shark permit holders, 262
incidental commercial shark permit holders, 162 smoothhound shark
permit holders, and 106 commercial shark dealers. Not all permit
holders are active in the fishery in any given year. Active directed
commercial shark permit holders are defined as those with valid permits
that landed one shark based on HMS electronic dealer reports. Of the
481 directed and incidental commercial shark permit holders, only 12
permit holders landed sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region and only 69
landed sharks in the Atlantic region. Of the 154 smoothhound shark
permit holders, only 61 permit holders landed smoothhound sharks in the
Atlantic region and none landed smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region. NMFS has determined that the proposed rule would not
likely affect any small governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule does not contain any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements (5 U.S.C. 603(b)(4)).
Similarly, this proposed rule would not conflict, duplicate, or overlap
with other relevant Federal rules (5 U.S.C. 603(b)(5)). Fishermen,
dealers, and managers in these fisheries must comply with a number of
international agreements as domestically implemented, domestic laws,
and FMPs. These include, but are not limited to, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act, the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered
Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and the Coastal Zone Management Act.
Section 603(c) of the RFA requires each IRFA to contain a
description of any significant alternatives to the proposed rule, which
would accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and
minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. Additionally, the RFA (5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)-(4)) lists four
general categories of significant alternatives that would assist an
agency in the development of significant alternatives. These categories
of alternatives are: (1) Establishment of differing compliance or
reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the
resources available to small entities; (2) clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting
requirements under the rule for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design standards; and (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule for small entities. In order to meet the
objectives of this proposed rule, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, NMFS cannot exempt small entities or change the reporting
requirements only for small entities, because all of the entities
affected are considered small entities. In addition, there are no
alternatives discussed that fall under the first, second, and fourth
categories described above. NMFS does not know of any performance or
design standards that would satisfy the aforementioned objectives of
this rulemaking while, concurrently, complying with the Magnuson-
Stevens Act; therefore, there are no alternatives considered under the
third category.
This rulemaking does not establish management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements previously adopted and analyzed
measures with adjustments, as specified in the 2006 Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP and its amendments and the Environmental Assessment
(EA) that accompanied the 2011 shark quota specifications rule (75 FR
76302; December 8, 2010). Thus, NMFS proposes to adjust quotas
established and analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP and
its amendments by subtracting the underharvest or adding the
overharvest as allowable. Thus, NMFS has limited flexibility to modify
the quotas in this rule, the impacts of which were analyzed in previous
regulatory flexibility analyses.
Based on the 2018 ex-vessel price (Table 3), fully harvesting the
unadjusted 2020 Atlantic shark commercial base quotas could result in
total fleet revenues of $8,775,599. For the Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark management group, NMFS is proposing to increase the base sub-
regional quotas due to the underharvests in 2019. The increase for the
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group could result in
a $232,674 gain in total revenues for fishermen in that sub-region,
while the increase for the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group could result in a $41,513 gain in total revenues for
fishermen in that sub-region. For the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
smoothhound shark management groups, NMFS is proposing to increase the
base quotas due to the underharvest in 2019. This would cause a
potential gain in revenue of $262,788 for the fleet in the Gulf of
Mexico region and a potential gain in revenue of $1,057,482 for the
fleet in the Atlantic region.
All of these changes in gross revenues are similar to the changes
in gross revenues analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments. The final regulatory flexibility analyses for those
amendments concluded that the economic impacts on these small entities
are expected to be minimal. In the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP
and its amendments and the EA for the 2011 shark quota specifications
rule, NMFS stated it would be conducting annual rulemakings and
considering the potential economic impacts of adjusting the quotas for
underharvests and overharvests at that time.
Table 3--Average Ex-Vessel Prices per lb dw for Each Shark Management Group, 2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average ex- Average ex-
Region Species vessel meat vessel fin
price price
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Gulf of Mexico........................ Blacktip Shark.................. $0.53 $10.94
Aggregated LCS.................. 0.67 11.61
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.51 11.12
Eastern Gulf of Mexico........................ Blacktip Shark.................. 1.06 9.54
Aggregated LCS.................. 0.59 11.93
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.40 13.20
Gulf of Mexico................................ Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.54 7.00
Smoothhound Shark............... 0.65 ..............
Atlantic...................................... Aggregated LCS.................. 0.98 11.06
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.42 6.66
Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.99 7.67
[[Page 49244]]
Blacknose Shark................. 1.21 ..............
Smoothhound Shark............... 0.74 1.62
No Region..................................... Shark Research Fishery 0.81 11.61
(Aggregated LCS).
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar 0.61 11.00
only).
Blue shark...................... 0.45 3.01
Porbeagle shark................. 1.18 3.01
Other Pelagic sharks............ 1.46 3.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this rule, NMFS also reviewed the criteria at Sec.
635.27(b)(3) to determine when opening each fishery would provide
equitable opportunities for fishermen, to the extent practicable, while
also considering the ecological needs of the different species. The
opening dates of the fishing season(s) could vary depending upon the
available annual quota, catch rates, and number of fishing participants
during the year. For the 2020 fishing year, NMFS is proposing to open
all of the shark management groups on the effective date of the final
rule for this action (expected to be on or about January 1). The direct
and indirect economic impacts would be neutral on a short- and long-
term basis because NMFS is not proposing to change the opening dates of
these fisheries from the status quo.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 16, 2019.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-20249 Filed 9-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P