SES Performance Review Board; Appointment of Members, 49297-49298 [2019-20204]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
F. Alternative Approaches to
Disaggregation
Generally, TMDL load allocations are
identified very broadly, covering entire
sectors, or even having a single load
allocation for all nonpoint sources in
the watershed. The EPA recommends
that states, tribes, and territories
consider whether it is appropriate to
apply these broad load allocations
uniformly across the watershed or,
instead, apply it differentially to
nonpoint sources on a geographic basis
or some other basis within the
watershed to maximize water quality
improvements. Examples of options that
policy makers and permitting
authorities may consider include:
• Reductions of nonpoint source
pollution at certain locations within the
watershed will result in reductions
sufficient to meet the TMDL load
allocation (e.g., at the headwaters of
streams or along the shoreline of the
impaired waterbody). Under this
scenario, because the entire load
allocation would be met by reductions
in a certain segment of the watershed,
nonpoint sources in other areas of the
watershed could be free to generate
credits immediately because reductions
from those sources are not needed to
meet the load allocation.
• A group of nonpoint source
pollutant reduction practices will meet
the load allocation and any pollutant
reduction activities beyond those
practices are eligible to generate credits.
This option addresses equity concerns
that might prevent early actors from
making early reductions.
• Specific nonpoint source sectors
(e.g. agriculture, silviculture, rangeland)
may need different levels of reductions
to meet the overall load allocation.
• A treatment facility installed on a
polluted waterway segment (as was
done in Idaho on the Dixie Drain) may
make sufficient reductions through
wastewater treatment to achieve the
load allocation.
The EPA recommends that any
alternate approaches that states decide
to adopt should be clear, transparent,
and demonstrate that the overall
planned reductions in the watershed are
sufficient to meet the overall TMDL
allocations for the watershed. The EPA
solicits comment on whether these are
viable and appropriate options and
whether additional or alternate
approaches may also be appropriate.
G. In-Lieu Fee Program
An in-lieu fee program might allow
NPDES permitted facilities to meet their
WQBELs by paying into a state,
territorial, or tribal fund specifically
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Sep 18, 2019
Jkt 247001
allocated for nonpoint source pollutant
loading reductions. The state, territory,
or tribe might use this funding, possibly
combined with other state, territorial,
tribal, or federal funds, to implement
nonpoint source BMPs in the relevant
geographic area. In-lieu fee programs
might be based on a payment of a
uniform fee, or payment of varying fees
(established in increasing tiers) to:
• Incentivize onsite as well as offsite
reductions;
• Provide equity for early actors;
• Address affordability;
• Address geographic disparities; or
• Address any relevant
environmental justice concerns.
The in-lieu fee could be set at a level
slightly higher than necessary for the
state, territory, or tribe to fund the BMPs
needed to generate the required credits
to cover the administrative costs of
running the program, insure against
risk, and enhance overall environmental
benefit.
To ensure water quality protection
and progress towards meeting TMDL
goals, the state, territory, or tribe could
use these funds to pay nonpoint sources
to implement pollutant reductions or to
support other activities that would
reduce overall nutrient loading in the
TMDL watershed. A reverse auction
model could maximize reductions per
dollar. In a reverse auction, the buyer
(the state, territory, or tribe) could offer
a price it would pay for a specified
pollutant reduction, and whomever is
willing to produce that reduction (the
credit) accepts the offer. If the offer is
not sufficient to cover credit generation
costs, generally no one would make a
bid, and the buyer would offer a higher
bid until it has found a willing generator
of a sufficient amount of credits. This
approach could keep costs down and
offer flexibility if the true cost of credit
generation rises.
The EPA solicits comment on the
concept of an in-lieu fee program and
whether it could be a useful tool for
policy makers and permitting
authorities to implement market-based
programs, including water quality
trading. The EPA also solicits comment
on examples of existing in-lieu fee
programs that are used to achieve
environmental improvements and if
there are specific programmatic
components that may enhance water
quality improvements.
IV. Request for Comment
The EPA is considering modifying or
clarifying existing EPA policy and
guidance on water quality trading to
remove unnecessary barriers and better
support market-based mechanisms,
including water quality trading,
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49297
consistent with the 2019 Memorandum.
The EPA is requesting comment from
states, tribes, stakeholders and other
members of the public on all aspects of
this document. In particular, the Agency
is requesting comment on:
• The proposed approaches described
in Section III of this document,
including preferences between the
approaches and the recommended
mechanisms to implement those
approaches;
• Other policy ideas or enhancements
that could help promote or facilitate
market-based programs to improve
water quality; and
• Other aspects of the 2003 Policy
and the 2019 Memorandum (including
potential conflicting or ambiguous
policy advice) that may benefit from
additional policy or clarification from
the EPA.
Dated: September 4, 2019.
David P. Ross,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2019–20324 Filed 9–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
SES Performance Review Board;
Appointment of Members
U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given of the
appointment of members to the
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin L. Richardson, Chief Human
Capital Officer, U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street
NE, Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663–
4306.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Publication of the PRB membership is
required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The
PRB reviews and evaluates the initial
appraisal of a Senior Executive’s
performance by the supervisor, and
makes recommendations to the Chair,
EEOC, with respect to performance
ratings, pay level adjustments, and
performance awards.
The following are the names and titles
of executives appointed to serve as
members of the SES PRB. Designated
members will serve a 12-month term,
which begins on November 1, 2019.
SUMMARY:
PRB Chair
Mr. Robbie Dix, Associate Director,
Appellate Review Programs, U.S.
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
49298
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2019 / Notices
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission
Members
Dr. Chris Haffer, Chief Data Officer, U.S.
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission
Ms. Carol Miaskoff, Associate Legal
Counsel, U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission
Ms. Rosa Viramontes, Program Manager,
U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission
Mr. Richard Toscano, Director, Equal
Employment Opportunity Staff,
U.S. Department of Justice
By the direction of the Commission.
Dated: September 13, 2019.
Reuben Daniels,
Acting Chief Operating Officer.
to the public; that no earlier notice of
the meeting was practicable; that the
public interest did not require
consideration of the matters in a
meeting open to public observation; and
that the matters could be considered in
a closed meeting by authority of
subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8),
(c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B) and (c)(10) of the
‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8),
(c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B) and (c)(10).
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Requests for further information
concerning the meeting may be directed
to Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202–
898–7043.
Dated at Washington, DC, on September
17, 2019.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–20204 Filed 9–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
[FR Doc. 2019–20453 Filed 9–17–19; 4:15 pm]
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
Sunshine Act Meeting
Pursuant to the
provisions of the ‘‘Government in the
Sunshine Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is
hereby given that at 1:49 p.m. on
Tuesday, September 17, 2019, the Board
of Directors of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation met in closed
session to consider matters related to
the Corporation’s supervision,
corporate, and resolution activities.
PLACE: The meeting was held in the
Board Room located on the sixth floor
of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC.
STATUS: The meeting was closed to the
public.
MATTERS CONSIDERED: In calling the
meeting, the Board determined, on
motion of Director Martin J. Gruenberg,
seconded by Director Joseph M. Otting
(Comptroller of the Currency), and
concurred in by Kathleen L. Kraninger
(Director, Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau) and Chairman Jelena
McWilliams, that Corporation business
required its consideration of the matters
which were to be the subject of this
meeting on less than seven days’ notice
TIME AND DATE:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request (OMB No.
3064–0046; –0113; –0169; –0174; and
–0191)
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Agency information collection
activities: Submission for OMB review;
comment request.
AGENCY:
The FDIC, as part of its
obligations under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the renewal of the existing
information collections described
below. On July 12, 2019, the FDIC
requested comment for 60 days on a
proposal to renew these information
collections. No comments were
received. The FDIC hereby gives notice
of its plan to submit to OMB a request
to approve the renewal of these
information collections, and again
invites comment on their renewal.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be submitted on
or before October 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to
the FDIC by any of the following
methods:
• https://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/
laws/federal.
• Email: comments@fdic.gov. Include
the name and number of the collection
in the subject line of the message.
• Mail: Manny Cabeza (202–898–
3767), Regulatory Counsel, MB–3128,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20429.
• Hand Delivery: Comments may be
hand-delivered to the guard station at
the rear of the 17th Street Building
(located on F Street), on business days
between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
All comments should refer to the
relevant OMB control number. A copy
of the comments may also be submitted
to the OMB desk officer for the FDIC:
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manny Cabeza, Regulatory Counsel,
202–898–3767, mcabeza@fdic.gov, MB–
3128, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, 550 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
12, 2019, the FDIC requested comment
for 60 days on a proposal to renew the
information collections described
below. No comments were received. The
FDIC hereby gives notice of its plan to
submit to OMB a request to approve the
renewal of these collection, and again
invites 1 comment on their renewal.
DATES:
Proposal To Renew the Following
Currently Approved Collections of
Information
1. Title: Home Mortgage Disclosure
(HMDA).
OMB Control Number: 3064–0046.
Form Number: None.
Affected Public: Insured state
nonmember banks.
Burden Estimate:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY OF ANNUAL BURDEN
Information collection (IC) description
Type of burden
Estimated
number of
respondents
Obligation to
respond
Estimated
number of
responses
Estimated
time per
response
(minutes)
Frequency of
response
Total
estimated
annual
burden
(hours)
Full Data Set
Home Mortgage Disclosure ...........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Sep 18, 2019
Reporting ............
Recordkeeping ...
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Mandatory ..........
Mandatory ..........
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
650
650
1,400
1,400
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
5
5
19SEN1
On Occasion ........
On Occasion ........
75,833
75,833
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49297-49298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20204]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
SES Performance Review Board; Appointment of Members
AGENCY: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin L. Richardson, Chief Human
Capital Officer, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M
Street NE, Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663-4306.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Publication of the PRB membership is
required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews and evaluates the
initial appraisal of a Senior Executive's performance by the
supervisor, and makes recommendations to the Chair, EEOC, with respect
to performance ratings, pay level adjustments, and performance awards.
The following are the names and titles of executives appointed to
serve as members of the SES PRB. Designated members will serve a 12-
month term, which begins on November 1, 2019.
PRB Chair
Mr. Robbie Dix, Associate Director, Appellate Review Programs, U.S.
[[Page 49298]]
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Members
Dr. Chris Haffer, Chief Data Officer, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission
Ms. Carol Miaskoff, Associate Legal Counsel, U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission
Ms. Rosa Viramontes, Program Manager, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission
Mr. Richard Toscano, Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Staff, U.S.
Department of Justice
By the direction of the Commission.
Dated: September 13, 2019.
Reuben Daniels,
Acting Chief Operating Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019-20204 Filed 9-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P