Review and Approval of Projects, 48312-48314 [2019-19814]
Download as PDF
48312
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(b) Affected ADs
(1) This AD replaces AD 2014–16–27,
Amendment 39–17951 (79 FR 51071, August
27, 2014) (‘‘AD 2014–16–27’’); and AD 2017–
19–14, Amendment 39–19044 (82 FR 43674,
September 19, 2017) (‘‘AD 2017–19–14’’).
(2) This AD affects AD 2010–26–05,
Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952,
December 21, 2010) (‘‘AD 2010–26–05’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Dassault Aviation
Model FALCON 900EX airplanes, serial
number (S/N) 97 and S/N 120 and higher,
certificated in any category, with an original
airworthiness certificate or original export
certificate of airworthiness issued on or
before September 1, 2018.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 05, Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination
that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Retained Revision of Maintenance or
Inspection Program, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2017–19–14, with no
changes. Within 90 days after October 24,
2017 (the effective date of AD 2017–19–14),
revise the maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate the
information specified in Chapter 5–40,
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 9, dated
November 2015, of the Dassault Falcon
900EX EASy, Falcon 900LX, and Falcon
900DX Maintenance Manual. The initial
compliance time for accomplishing the
actions specified in Chapter 5–40,
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 9, dated
November 2015, of the Dassault Falcon
900EX EASy, Falcon 900LX, and Falcon
900DX Maintenance Manual, is within the
applicable times specified in the
maintenance manual or 90 days after October
24, 2017, whichever occurs later, except as
provided by paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4)
of this AD.
(1) The term ‘‘LDG’’ in the ‘‘First
Inspection’’ column of any table in the
service information means total airplane
landings.
(2) The term ‘‘FH’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’
column of any table in the service
information means total flight hours.
(3) The term ‘‘FC’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’
column of any table in the service
information means total flight cycles.
(4) The term ‘‘M’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’
column of any table in the service
information means months.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Sep 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
(h) Retained No Alternative Actions and
Intervals, With New Exception
This paragraph restates the requirements
specified in paragraph (h) of AD 2017–19–14,
with a new exception. Except as required by
paragraph (i) of this AD, after accomplishing
the revision required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, no alternative actions (inspections) or
intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
(i) New Requirement of This AD:
Maintenance or Inspection Program
Revision
Within 90 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the information specified in
Chapter 5–40, Airworthiness Limitations,
Revision 11, dated September 2018, of the
Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy, Falcon 900LX,
and Falcon 900DX Maintenance Manual. The
initial compliance time for accomplishing the
actions specified in Chapter 5–40,
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 11,
dated September 2018, of the Dassault Falcon
900EX EASy, Falcon 900LX, and Falcon
900DX Maintenance Manual, is within the
applicable times specified in the
maintenance manual, or 90 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, except as provided by paragraphs (i)(1)
through (i)(4) of this AD.
(1) The term ‘‘LDG’’ in the ‘‘First
Inspection’’ column of any table in the
service information means total airplane
landings.
(2) The term ‘‘FH’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’
column of any table in the service
information means total flight hours.
(3) The term ‘‘FC’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’
column of any table in the service
information means total flight cycles.
(4) The term ‘‘M’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’
column of any table in the service
information means months since the date of
issuance of the original airworthiness
certificate or the date of issuance of the
original export certificate of airworthiness.
(j) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the existing maintenance or
inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or
intervals may be used unless the actions and
intervals are approved as an AMOC in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
(k) Terminating Actions for Certain Actions
in AD 2010–26–05
Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) or (i) of this AD terminates the
requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of AD 2010–
26–05, for Dassault Aviation Model 900EX
airplanes, S/N 97 and S/N 120 and higher.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (m)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA; or the European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Dassault Aviation’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2019–0134, dated June 11, 2019, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0697.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3226.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet
Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606;
telephone 201–440–6700; internet https://
www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
September 6, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–19772 Filed 9–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN
COMMISSION
18 CFR Parts 806
Review and Approval of Projects
Susquehanna River Basin
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules
This document contains
proposed rules that would amend the
regulations of the Susquehanna River
Basin Commission (Commission)
dealing with the mitigation of
consumptive uses. These rules are
designed to enhance and improve the
Commission’s existing authorities to
manage the water resources of the basin.
DATES: The Commission will hold an
informational webinar explaining the
proposed rulemaking on October 1,
2019. Instructions for registration for the
webinars will be posted on the
Commission’s website.
Comments on the proposed
rulemaking may be submitted to the
Commission on or before November 12,
2019. The Commission has scheduled a
public hearing on the proposed
rulemaking to be held on October 31,
2019 in Harrisburg, PA. The location of
the public hearing is listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed
to: Jason E. Oyler, Esq., General
Counsel, Susquehanna River Basin
Commission, 4423 N Front Street,
Harrisburg, PA 17110–1788, or by email
to regcomments@srbc.net. The public
hearing location is at the Commission
Headquarters at the above address.
Those wishing to testify are asked to
notify the Commission in advance, if
possible, at the regular address listed
above or electronic address given below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason E. Oyler, Esq., General Counsel,
telephone: 717–238–0423, ext. 1312;
fax: 717–238–2436; email: joyler@
srbc.net. Also, for further information
on the proposed rulemaking, visit the
Commission’s website at https://
www.srbc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission undertook a more
comprehensive overhaul of its
regulations that were proposed in
September of 2016 and adopted as final
in June of 2017. As a part of that final
rulemaking, the Commission reserved
the changes it had proposed pertaining
to its regulation of the consumptive use
of water. It had also proposed a draft
Consumptive Use Mitigation Policy as a
companion to that rulemaking, which
was also reserved. The Commission has
performed a more comprehensive
analysis of the comments received on
that rulemaking and policy, and changes
to the consumptive use regulation are
proposed herein as a follow up to that
effort. In addition, as a companion to
this rulemaking, the Commission is also
releasing a revised draft policy for
Consumptive Use Mitigation to be open
for public comment simultaneously
with this proposed rulemaking.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Sep 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
48313
Standards for Consumptive Uses of
Water—18 CFR 806.22
PART 806—REVIEW AND APPROVAL
OF PROJECTS
Section 806.22 (regarding standards
for consumptive uses of water) will be
revised. The proposed revisions in
§ 806.22(b)(1) and (2) lower the 90-day
standard for consumptive use mitigation
to 45 days and require that any
alternative water source or storage will
not likely impact nearby surface waters.
The purpose of these changes is to
reduce the barriers to project sponsors
providing their own mitigation.
Analysis of the past 100 plus years of
river flow records show that the
overwhelming majority of low flow
events in the Basin are adequately
covered by a continuous 45-day
consumptive use mitigation standard.
Further, the prior standard that
alternative supplies or storage have no
impact was too rigid for projects to find
suitable alternative supplies.
Section 806.22(b) is also revised to
clarify that discontinuance includes
reduction of water consumption to less
than 20,000 gallons per day (gpd). This
was the Commission’s policy from 1992
until 2006 when the present rule was
adopted. In practice, complete
discontinuance was found to be
impractical and unrealistic for many
projects; however, some projects have
demonstrated the ability to reduce usage
to 20,000 gallons per day when
necessary. This practice allows
continued operations at a locally de
minimis consumptive use level while
reducing mitigation demand on either
the project or the Commission.
Accordingly, this change is designed to
increase the feasibility of projects being
able to select discontinuance as a
mitigation option. Discontinuance of
use is the most effective method of
mitigation because it reduces and/or
eliminates the water use during
Commission designated low flows
periods and does not depend on any
further action by the Commission or
project sponsor to be effectuated.
Section 806.22(e) is amended to allow
a project sourced by reuse of
stormwater, wastewater or other reused
or recycled water to be eligible for an
Approval by Rule for consumptive use.
■
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 806
Administrative practice and
procedure, Water resources.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, the Susquehanna River
Basin Commission proposes to amend
18 CFR part 806 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. The authority citation for part 806
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 3.4, 3.5 (5), 3.8, 3.10 and
15.2, Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq.
2. Amend § 806.22 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1) and (e)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 806.22
water.
Standards for consumptive use of
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) During low flow periods as may be
designated by the Commission for
consumptive use mitigation.
(i) Reduce withdrawal from the
approved source(s), in an amount equal
to the project’s consumptive use, and
withdraw water from alternative surface
water storage or aquifers or other
underground storage chambers or
facilities approved by the Commission,
from which water can be withdrawn for
a period of 45 continuous days such that
impacts to nearby surface waters will
not likely be at a magnitude or in a
timeframe that would exacerbate
present low flow conditions.
(ii) Release water for flow
augmentation, in an amount equal to the
project’s consumptive use, from surface
water storage or aquifers, or other
underground storage chambers or
facilities approved by the Commission,
from which water can be withdrawn for
a period of 45 continuous days such that
impacts to nearby surface waters will
not likely be at a magnitude or in a
timeframe that would exacerbate
present low flow conditions.
(iii) Discontinue the project’s
consumptive use, which may include
reduction of the project sponsor’s
consumptive use to less than 20,000 gpd
during periods of low flow. In any case
of failure to provide the specified
discontinuance, such project shall
provide mitigation in accordance with
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, for the
calendar year in which such failure
occurs, after which the Commission will
reevaluate the continued acceptability
of the discontinuance.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) General rule. Except with respect
to projects involving hydrocarbon
development subject to the provisions of
paragraph (f) of this section, any project
that is solely supplied water for
consumptive use by public water
supply, stormwater, wastewater, or
other reused or recycled water, or any
combination thereof, may be approved
by the Executive Director under this
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
48314
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2019 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (e) in accordance with the
following, unless the Executive Director
determines that the project cannot be
adequately regulated under this
approval by rule.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 9, 2019.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–19814 Filed 9–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA–497]
Designation of Benzylfentanyl and 4Anilinopiperidine, Precursor
Chemicals Used in the Illicit
Manufacture of Fentanyl, as List I
Chemicals
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) is proposing the
control of N-(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)-Nphenylpropionamide (also known as
benzylfentanyl), including its salts, and
N-phenylpiperidin-4-amine (also known
as 4-anilinopiperidine; N-phenyl-4piperidinamine; 4–AP) (hereinafter
referred to as 4-anilinopiperidine),
including its amides, its carbamates,
and its salts, as list I chemicals under
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
Benzylfentanyl and 4anilinopiperidine are used in, and are
important to, the illicit manufacture of
the schedule II controlled substance
fentanyl. If finalized, this action would
subject handlers of benzylfentanyl and
4-anilinopiperidine to the chemical
regulatory provisions of the CSA and its
implementing regulations. This
rulemaking does not establish a
threshold for domestic and international
transactions of benzylfentanyl or 4anilinopiperidine. As such, all
transactions of chemical mixtures
containing benzylfentanyl or 4anilinopiperidine will be regulated at
any concentration and will be subject to
control under the CSA.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
electronically or postmarked on or
before November 12, 2019. Commenters
should be aware that the electronic
Federal Docket Management System
will not accept any comments after
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Sep 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the last day
of the comment period.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–497’’ on all electronic and
written correspondence, including any
attachments.
• Electronic comments: The DEA
encourages that all comments be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal which
provides the ability to type short
comments directly into the comment
field on the web page or attach a file for
lengthier comments. Please go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions at that site for
submitting comments. Upon completion
of your submission, you will receive a
Comment Tracking Number for your
comment. Please be aware that
submitted comments are not
instantaneously available for public
view on Regulations.gov. If you have
received a Comment Tracking Number,
your comment has been successfully
submitted and there is no need to
resubmit the same comment.
• Paper comments: Paper comments
that duplicate electronic submissions
are not necessary. Should you wish to
mail a paper comment, in lieu of an
electronic comment, it should be sent
via regular or express mail to: Drug
Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA
Federal Register Representative/DPW,
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield,
Virginia 22152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott A. Brinks, Regulatory Drafting and
Policy Support Section (DPW),
Diversion Control Division, Drug
Enforcement Administration; Mailing
Address: 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone:
(202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments
received in response to this docket are
considered part of the public record.
They will, unless reasonable cause is
given, be made available by the DEA for
public inspection online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter. The Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) applies to all
comments received. If you want to
submit personal identifying information
(such as your name, address, etc.) as
part of your comment, but do not want
it to be made publicly available, you
must include the phrase ‘‘PERSONAL
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION’’ in the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
first paragraph of your comment. You
must also place all of the personal
identifying information you do not want
made publicly available in the first
paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be made
publicly available, you must include the
phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify the confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment.
Comments containing personal
identifying information or confidential
business information identified as
directed above will be made publicly
available in redacted form. If a comment
has so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be made publicly available.
Comments posted to https://
www.regulations.gov may include any
personal identifying information (such
as name, address, and phone number)
included in the text of your electronic
submission that is not identified as
directed above as confidential.
An electronic copy of this proposed
rule is available at https://
www.regulations.gov for easy reference.
Legal Authority
The CSA gives the Attorney General
the authority to specify, by regulation,
chemicals as list I or list II chemicals.
21 U.S.C. 802(34) and (35). A ‘‘list I
chemical’’ is a chemical that is used in
manufacturing a controlled substance in
violation of title II of the CSA and is
important to the manufacture of the
controlled substance. 21 U.S.C. 802(34).
A ‘‘list II chemical’’ is a chemical (other
than a list I chemical) that is used in
manufacturing a controlled substance in
violation of title II of the CSA. 21 U.S.C.
802(35). The current list of all listed
chemicals is published at 21 CFR
1310.02. Pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100(b),
the Attorney General has delegated his
authority to designate list I and list II
chemicals to the Administrator of the
Drug Enforcement Administration.
Background
The DEA is extremely concerned with
the increase in the illicit manufacture
and distribution of fentanyl. Fentanyl is
a synthetic opioid and was first
synthesized in Belgium in the late
1950’s. Fentanyl is controlled in
schedule II of the CSA due to its high
potential for abuse and dependence, and
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States. Fentanyl was introduced
E:\FR\FM\13SEP1.SGM
13SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48312-48314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19814]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
18 CFR Parts 806
Review and Approval of Projects
AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 48313]]
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed rules that would amend the
regulations of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission (Commission)
dealing with the mitigation of consumptive uses. These rules are
designed to enhance and improve the Commission's existing authorities
to manage the water resources of the basin.
DATES: The Commission will hold an informational webinar explaining the
proposed rulemaking on October 1, 2019. Instructions for registration
for the webinars will be posted on the Commission's website.
Comments on the proposed rulemaking may be submitted to the
Commission on or before November 12, 2019. The Commission has scheduled
a public hearing on the proposed rulemaking to be held on October 31,
2019 in Harrisburg, PA. The location of the public hearing is listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Jason E. Oyler, Esq., General
Counsel, Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 N Front Street,
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788, or by email to [email protected]. The
public hearing location is at the Commission Headquarters at the above
address.
Those wishing to testify are asked to notify the Commission in
advance, if possible, at the regular address listed above or electronic
address given below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, Esq., General Counsel,
telephone: 717-238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: 717-238-2436; email:
[email protected]. Also, for further information on the proposed
rulemaking, visit the Commission's website at https://www.srbc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission undertook a more
comprehensive overhaul of its regulations that were proposed in
September of 2016 and adopted as final in June of 2017. As a part of
that final rulemaking, the Commission reserved the changes it had
proposed pertaining to its regulation of the consumptive use of water.
It had also proposed a draft Consumptive Use Mitigation Policy as a
companion to that rulemaking, which was also reserved. The Commission
has performed a more comprehensive analysis of the comments received on
that rulemaking and policy, and changes to the consumptive use
regulation are proposed herein as a follow up to that effort. In
addition, as a companion to this rulemaking, the Commission is also
releasing a revised draft policy for Consumptive Use Mitigation to be
open for public comment simultaneously with this proposed rulemaking.
Standards for Consumptive Uses of Water--18 CFR 806.22
Section 806.22 (regarding standards for consumptive uses of water)
will be revised. The proposed revisions in Sec. 806.22(b)(1) and (2)
lower the 90-day standard for consumptive use mitigation to 45 days and
require that any alternative water source or storage will not likely
impact nearby surface waters. The purpose of these changes is to reduce
the barriers to project sponsors providing their own mitigation.
Analysis of the past 100 plus years of river flow records show that the
overwhelming majority of low flow events in the Basin are adequately
covered by a continuous 45-day consumptive use mitigation standard.
Further, the prior standard that alternative supplies or storage have
no impact was too rigid for projects to find suitable alternative
supplies.
Section 806.22(b) is also revised to clarify that discontinuance
includes reduction of water consumption to less than 20,000 gallons per
day (gpd). This was the Commission's policy from 1992 until 2006 when
the present rule was adopted. In practice, complete discontinuance was
found to be impractical and unrealistic for many projects; however,
some projects have demonstrated the ability to reduce usage to 20,000
gallons per day when necessary. This practice allows continued
operations at a locally de minimis consumptive use level while reducing
mitigation demand on either the project or the Commission. Accordingly,
this change is designed to increase the feasibility of projects being
able to select discontinuance as a mitigation option. Discontinuance of
use is the most effective method of mitigation because it reduces and/
or eliminates the water use during Commission designated low flows
periods and does not depend on any further action by the Commission or
project sponsor to be effectuated.
Section 806.22(e) is amended to allow a project sourced by reuse of
stormwater, wastewater or other reused or recycled water to be eligible
for an Approval by Rule for consumptive use.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 806
Administrative practice and procedure, Water resources.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the
Susquehanna River Basin Commission proposes to amend 18 CFR part 806 as
follows:
PART 806--REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PROJECTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 806 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 3.4, 3.5 (5), 3.8, 3.10 and 15.2, Pub. L. 91-
575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 806.22 by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (e)(1) to read
as follows:
Sec. 806.22 Standards for consumptive use of water.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) During low flow periods as may be designated by the Commission
for consumptive use mitigation.
(i) Reduce withdrawal from the approved source(s), in an amount
equal to the project's consumptive use, and withdraw water from
alternative surface water storage or aquifers or other underground
storage chambers or facilities approved by the Commission, from which
water can be withdrawn for a period of 45 continuous days such that
impacts to nearby surface waters will not likely be at a magnitude or
in a timeframe that would exacerbate present low flow conditions.
(ii) Release water for flow augmentation, in an amount equal to the
project's consumptive use, from surface water storage or aquifers, or
other underground storage chambers or facilities approved by the
Commission, from which water can be withdrawn for a period of 45
continuous days such that impacts to nearby surface waters will not
likely be at a magnitude or in a timeframe that would exacerbate
present low flow conditions.
(iii) Discontinue the project's consumptive use, which may include
reduction of the project sponsor's consumptive use to less than 20,000
gpd during periods of low flow. In any case of failure to provide the
specified discontinuance, such project shall provide mitigation in
accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of this section, for the calendar year
in which such failure occurs, after which the Commission will
reevaluate the continued acceptability of the discontinuance.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) General rule. Except with respect to projects involving
hydrocarbon development subject to the provisions of paragraph (f) of
this section, any project that is solely supplied water for consumptive
use by public water supply, stormwater, wastewater, or other reused or
recycled water, or any combination thereof, may be approved by the
Executive Director under this
[[Page 48314]]
paragraph (e) in accordance with the following, unless the Executive
Director determines that the project cannot be adequately regulated
under this approval by rule.
* * * * *
Dated: September 9, 2019.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-19814 Filed 9-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P