Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Modification of DFARS Clause “Release of Past Infringement” (DFARS Case 2019-D012), 48499-48500 [2019-19559]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
b. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(4) and
(5) as paragraphs (a)(3) and (4),
respectively.
■
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
3. Revise section 252.239–7004 to
read as follows:
■
252.239–7004
Services.
Orders for Facilities and
As prescribed in 239.7411(a), use the
following clause:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES2
ORDERS FOR FACILITIES AND
SERVICES (SEP 2019)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
Governmental regulatory body means the
Federal Communications Commission, any
statewide regulatory body, or any body with
less than statewide jurisdiction when
operating under the state authority.
Regulatory bodies whose decisions are not
subject to judicial appeal and regulatory
bodies which regulate a company owned by
the same entity that creates the regulatory
body are not governmental regulatory bodies.
(b) The Contractor shall acknowledge a
communication service authorization or
other type order for supplies and facilities
by—
(1) Commencing performance after receipt
of an order; or
(2) Written acceptance by a duly
authorized representative.
(c) The Contractor shall furnish the
services and facilities under this agreement/
contract in accordance with all applicable
tariffs, rates, charges, regulations,
requirements, terms, and conditions of—
(1) Service and facilities furnished or
offered by the Contractor to the general
public or the Contractor’s subscribers; or
(2) Service as lawfully established by a
governmental regulatory body.
(d) The Government will not prepay for
services.
(e) For nontariffed services, the Contractor
shall charge the Government at the lowest
rate and under the most favorable terms and
conditions for similar service and facilities
offered to any other customer.
(f) Recurring charges for services and
facilities shall, in each case, start with the
satisfactory beginning of service or provision
of facilities or equipment and are payable
monthly in arrears.
(g) Expediting charges are costs necessary
to get services earlier than normal. Examples
are overtime pay or special shipment. When
authorized, expediting charges shall be the
additional costs incurred by the Contractor
and the subcontractor. The Government shall
pay expediting charges only when—
(1) They are provided for in the tariff
established by a governmental regulatory
body; or
(2) They are authorized in a
communication service authorization or
other contractual document.
(h) When services normally provided are
technically unacceptable and the
development, fabrication, or manufacture of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Sep 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
special equipment is required, the
Government may—
(1) Provide the equipment; or
(2) Direct the Contractor to acquire the
equipment or facilities. If the Contractor
acquires the equipment or facilities, the
acquisition shall be competitive, if
practicable.
(i) If at any time the Government defers or
changes its orders for any of the services but
does not cancel or terminate them, the
amount paid or payable to the Contractor for
the services deferred or modified shall be
equitably adjusted under applicable tariffs
filed by the Contractor with the regulatory
commission in effect at the time of deferral
or change. If no tariffs are in effect, the
Government and the Contractor shall
equitably adjust the rates by mutual
agreement. Failure to agree on any
adjustment shall be a dispute concerning a
question of fact within the meaning of the
Disputes clause of this contract.
(End of clause)
252.239–7005
[Removed and Reserved]
4. Remove and reserve section
252.239–7005.
■
[FR Doc. 2019–19558 Filed 9–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 252
[Docket DARS–2019–0049]
RIN 0750–AK49
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Modification
of DFARS Clause ‘‘Release of Past
Infringement’’ (DFARS Case 2019–
D012)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to update pronouns used in a
clause.
DATES: Effective September 13, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to
update the pronouns used in DFARS
clause 252.227.7001, Release of Past
Infringement. This clause is included,
when necessary, in contracts that
contain patent release and settlement
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
48499
agreements, license agreements, and
assignments. The clause addresses the
release of claims or demands of certain
inventions associated with the contract.
Within the clause text the contractor is
identified using the pronouns ‘‘he’’ or
‘‘him.’’ Current drafting convention
simplifies and clarifies clause language
by referring to a contractor as ‘‘the
contractor’’ in clause text. This rule
updates this clause to conform the text
to current drafting conventions.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The modification of this DFARS text
implements a recommendation from the
DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On
February 24, 2017, the President signed
Executive Order (E.O.) 13777,
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda,’’ which established a Federal
policy ‘‘to alleviate unnecessary
regulatory burdens’’ on the American
people. In accordance with E.O. 13777,
DoD established a Regulatory Reform
Task Force to review and validate DoD
regulations, including the DFARS. A
public notice of the establishment of the
DFARS Subgroup to the DoD Regulatory
Reform Task Force, for the purpose of
reviewing DFARS provisions and
clauses, was published in the Federal
Register at 82 FR 35741 on August 1,
2017, and requested public input. One
public comment was received on this
clause.
Comment: The respondent advised
that the clause is never used and should
be deleted from the DFARS. The
respondent recommended that, instead
of the clause, a policy statement
permitting DoD to enter into settlement
agreements where patent and copyright
infringement is alleged by a third party
owner of a patent or copyright would
suffice.
Response: DFARS clause 252.227–
7001 serves as an agreement, through
incorporation in the contract, between
DoD and the contractor that, by
execution of the contract, the contractor
releases DoD from all claims and
demands the contractor has (or will
have) against DoD for the use or
manufacture by DoD of inventions
specifically covered by patents and
applications identified under the
contract. The clause applies to the
requirements and content of the
individual contract. As such, the clause
is necessary, when applicable, in the
contract to represent the agreement to
such terms by both parties, as they
relate to the specific contract. A general
statement of policy does not fulfill the
intent of this clause. Additionally, the
clause is available for use, when
applicable and necessary, and can be
modified to meet particular
E:\FR\FM\13SER2.SGM
13SER2
48500
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
circumstances for the specific
requirement, with consultation with
cognizant patent or legal counsel.
This clause is beneficial to DoD by
facilitating a standard and uniform
incorporation of more common terms
and conditions associated with patent
and license agreements and assignments
into applicable contracts, without
having to draft the language of these
more common terms and conditions
with each contract. This approach also
ensures the same language is
incorporated into each contract, which
helps DoD avoid miscommunications or
misunderstanding and maintain
consistency in negotiating such terms
and conditions DoD-wide.
The DoD Regulatory Reform Task
Force reviewed the requirements of
DFARS clause 252.227–7001 and
determined that the DFARS clause
should only be updated to conform to
current drafting standards.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES2
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
This rule only updates pronouns used
in DFARS clause 252.227–7001. The
rule does not impose any new
requirements on contracts at or below
the simplified acquisition threshold and
for commercial items, including
commercially available off-the-shelf
items
IV. Publication of This Final Rule for
Public Comment Is Not Required by
Statute
The statute that applies to the
publication of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation is Office of Federal
Procurement Policy statute (codified at
title 41 of the United States Code).
Specifically, 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1)
requires that a procurement policy,
regulation, procedure or form (including
an amendment or modification thereof)
must be published for public comment
if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a
significant effect beyond the internal
operating procedures of the agency
issuing the policy, regulation,
procedure, or form, or has a significant
cost or administrative impact on
contractors or offerors. This final rule is
not required to be published for public
comment, because DoD is not issuing a
new regulation; rather, this rule merely
updates the contact information already
provided for in existing clauses.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Sep 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
VI. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13771,
because this rule is not a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be
given for this rule under 41 U.S.C.
1707(a)(1) (see section IV. of this
preamble), the analytical requirements
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not applicable.
Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required, and none has been
prepared.
‘‘(description of subject matter)’’ and
adding ‘‘which the Contractor’’,
‘‘acquired by the Contractor’’, and
‘‘[description of subject matter]’’ in their
places, respectively.
[FR Doc. 2019–19559 Filed 9–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 252
[Docket DARS–2019–0055]
RIN 0750–AK53
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Modification
of DFARS Clause ‘‘Trade Agreements’’
(DFARS Case 2019–D016)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to update a paragraph citation
in DFARS clause 252.225–7021, Trade
Agreements.
SUMMARY:
Effective September 13, 2019.
Ms.
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
I. Background
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is
amended as follows:
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
1. The authority citation for part 252
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
252.227–7001
[Amended]
2. Amend section 252.227–7001 by—
a. Removing the clause date of ‘‘(AUG
1984)’’ and adding ‘‘(SEP 2019)’’ in its
place; and
■ b. In the clause text, removing ‘‘which
he’’, ‘‘acquired by him’’, and
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
This final rule amends DFARS clause
252.225–7021, Trade Agreements, to
update an outdated citation in
paragraph (e) of the basic clause and
paragraph (f) of the alternate II clause.
The DFARS clause is included in
solicitations and contracts for the
acquisition of supplies subject to the
World Trade Organization Government
Procurement Agreement. The clause:
Provides pertinent definitions and
country listings for designated and
qualifying countries; requires
contractors to deliver only U.S.-made,
qualifying country, or designated
country end items, unless otherwise
stated in the contract; prohibits the
contract price from including duty for
products for which the contractor will
claim duty-free entry; and provides
information on applicable sections of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS).
Paragraph (e) of the basic clause and
paragraph (f) of the alternate II clause
provide a link to the HTSUS and
identify specific sections of the
Schedule that provide more information
E:\FR\FM\13SER2.SGM
13SER2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48499-48500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19559]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 252
[Docket DARS-2019-0049]
RIN 0750-AK49
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Modification
of DFARS Clause ``Release of Past Infringement'' (DFARS Case 2019-D012)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update pronouns used in a
clause.
DATES: Effective September 13, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carrie Moore, telephone 571-372-
6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to update the pronouns used in DFARS
clause 252.227.7001, Release of Past Infringement. This clause is
included, when necessary, in contracts that contain patent release and
settlement agreements, license agreements, and assignments. The clause
addresses the release of claims or demands of certain inventions
associated with the contract. Within the clause text the contractor is
identified using the pronouns ``he'' or ``him.'' Current drafting
convention simplifies and clarifies clause language by referring to a
contractor as ``the contractor'' in clause text. This rule updates this
clause to conform the text to current drafting conventions.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The modification of this DFARS text implements a recommendation
from the DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On February 24, 2017, the
President signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13777, ``Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda,'' which established a Federal policy ``to
alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens'' on the American people. In
accordance with E.O. 13777, DoD established a Regulatory Reform Task
Force to review and validate DoD regulations, including the DFARS. A
public notice of the establishment of the DFARS Subgroup to the DoD
Regulatory Reform Task Force, for the purpose of reviewing DFARS
provisions and clauses, was published in the Federal Register at 82 FR
35741 on August 1, 2017, and requested public input. One public comment
was received on this clause.
Comment: The respondent advised that the clause is never used and
should be deleted from the DFARS. The respondent recommended that,
instead of the clause, a policy statement permitting DoD to enter into
settlement agreements where patent and copyright infringement is
alleged by a third party owner of a patent or copyright would suffice.
Response: DFARS clause 252.227-7001 serves as an agreement, through
incorporation in the contract, between DoD and the contractor that, by
execution of the contract, the contractor releases DoD from all claims
and demands the contractor has (or will have) against DoD for the use
or manufacture by DoD of inventions specifically covered by patents and
applications identified under the contract. The clause applies to the
requirements and content of the individual contract. As such, the
clause is necessary, when applicable, in the contract to represent the
agreement to such terms by both parties, as they relate to the specific
contract. A general statement of policy does not fulfill the intent of
this clause. Additionally, the clause is available for use, when
applicable and necessary, and can be modified to meet particular
[[Page 48500]]
circumstances for the specific requirement, with consultation with
cognizant patent or legal counsel.
This clause is beneficial to DoD by facilitating a standard and
uniform incorporation of more common terms and conditions associated
with patent and license agreements and assignments into applicable
contracts, without having to draft the language of these more common
terms and conditions with each contract. This approach also ensures the
same language is incorporated into each contract, which helps DoD avoid
miscommunications or misunderstanding and maintain consistency in
negotiating such terms and conditions DoD-wide.
The DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force reviewed the requirements of
DFARS clause 252.227-7001 and determined that the DFARS clause should
only be updated to conform to current drafting standards.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule only updates pronouns used in DFARS clause 252.227-7001.
The rule does not impose any new requirements on contracts at or below
the simplified acquisition threshold and for commercial items,
including commercially available off-the-shelf items
IV. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required
by Statute
The statute that applies to the publication of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation is Office of Federal Procurement Policy statute
(codified at title 41 of the United States Code). Specifically, 41
U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) requires that a procurement policy, regulation,
procedure or form (including an amendment or modification thereof) must
be published for public comment if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of the agency issuing the policy,
regulation, procedure, or form, or has a significant cost or
administrative impact on contractors or offerors. This final rule is
not required to be published for public comment, because DoD is not
issuing a new regulation; rather, this rule merely updates the contact
information already provided for in existing clauses.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs,
of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a
significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review
under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
VI. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13771, because this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule under 41
U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) (see section IV. of this preamble), the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required, and none has been prepared.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is amended as follows:
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
1. The authority citation for part 252 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
252.227-7001 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 252.227-7001 by--
0
a. Removing the clause date of ``(AUG 1984)'' and adding ``(SEP 2019)''
in its place; and
0
b. In the clause text, removing ``which he'', ``acquired by him'', and
``(description of subject matter)'' and adding ``which the
Contractor'', ``acquired by the Contractor'', and ``[description of
subject matter]'' in their places, respectively.
[FR Doc. 2019-19559 Filed 9-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P