Notice of Neighborhood Stabilization Program; Changes to Closeout Requirements Related to Program Income Amendment, 48165-48168 [2019-19708]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2019 / Notices
more than one component maintains
Privacy Act records concerning him or
her, the individual may submit the
request to the Senior Agency Official for
Privacy, HUD, 451 Seventh Street SW,
Room 10139, Washington, DC 20410.
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
HISTORY:
EDM SORN was originally published
in: DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No.
FR–6009–N–02] Privacy Act of 1974:
Enterprise Data Management (EDM)
System of Records.
Dated: August 26, 2019.
John G. Bravacos,
Senior Agency Official for Privacy.
[FR Doc. 2019–19713 Filed 9–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–6170–N–01]
Notice of Neighborhood Stabilization
Program; Changes to Closeout
Requirements Related to Program
Income Amendment
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice describes changes
to closeout requirements applied to, and
additional regulations waived for,
grantees receiving grants in the three
rounds of funding under the
Neighborhood Stabilization Program,
who are also grantees in the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
program.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable Date: September 12,
2019.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessie Handforth Kome, Acting Director,
Office of Block Grant Assistance, Office
of Community Planning and
Development, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW, Room 7282, Washington, DC
20410; telephone number 202–708–3587
(this is not a toll-free number). Persons
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number via TTY by
calling the Federal Relay at 800–877–
8339 (this is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Neighborhood Stabilization
Program (NSP) was established by
Division B, Title III of the Housing and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA)
(Pub. L. 110–289, approved July 30,
2008), for the stabilization of
communities that have suffered from
residential foreclosures and
abandonment. As established by HERA,
NSP provided grants to all states and
selected local governments on a formula
basis. The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act) (division A, title XII of Pub. L. 111–
5, approved February 17, 2009)
authorized additional NSP grants to be
awarded to states, local governments,
nonprofits and a consortium of
nonprofit entities, but on a competitive
basis. The Recovery Act also authorized
funding for national and local technical
assistance providers to support NSP
grantees. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank Act) (Pub. L. 111–203,
approved July 21, 2010) authorized a
third round of NSP grants to all states
and select units of general local
governments (UGLG) on a formula basis.
The purpose of the funds awarded
under the three rounds of NSP is to
target the stabilization of neighborhoods
negatively affected by residential
properties that have been foreclosed
upon or abandoned. The Notice of
Formula Allocations and Program
Requirements for Neighborhood
Stabilization Program Formula Grants,
published October 19, 2010 (75 FR
64322) (‘‘Unified NSP Notice’’), as
amended, provides further background
for these programs, the program
principles, and the objectives and
outcomes of the NSP program. The
Notice of Neighborhood Stabilization
Program; Closeout Requirements and
Recapture (Closeout Notice), published
November 27, 2012 (77 FR 70799), as
amended, amended the Unified NSP
Notice by adding grant closeout and
related provisions. In addition, the
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
for the Neighborhood Stabilization
Program 2 Under the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009,
74 FR 21377 (May 7, 2009), as amended
by subsequent notices (‘‘NSP2 NOFA’’),
includes requirements specific to the
competitive round of funding under the
Recovery Act.
II. This Notice
The primary purpose of this Notice is
to hasten the expenditure of remaining
grant funds to facilitate closeout of all
open NSP grants, given that most
originally planned program activities
are at or near completion. To facilitate
that purpose, this notice eliminates the
requirement that NSP2 and NSP3
grantees must use the HUD Foreclosure
Need website to identify new target
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48165
areas before using NSP funds. It also
provides additional guidance related to
NSP program income, as well as
encourages the use of existing
Community Development Block Grant
formula funds to leverage investments
in targeted areas.
Targeting New Areas of Need
For all three rounds of NSP, HERA
required that grantees give priority
emphasis to geographic areas of greatest
need. To implement this requirement,
HUD developed a Foreclosure Need
website and mapping tools and required
NSP2 and NSP3 grantees to use the
HUD data to identify target areas with
an individual or average combined
index score of not less than lesser of 17
or the 20th percentile most needy score
in an individual state. NSP1 grantees
were encouraged, but not required, to
use the HUD data. Because the program
has expended 98% of the $8.639 billion
in grant funds and program income,
HUD is no longer updating the
Foreclosure Need websites and mapping
tools. Moreover, HUD has observed that
grantees have largely served their
identified areas of greatest need.
In identifying new target areas, HUD
supports the ability of NSP grantees to
use these funds in Opportunity Zones.
Created by the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs
Act, the Opportunity Zone tax
incentives are designed to stimulate
private investment in designated, lowincome census tracts and allows
individuals and companies to invest
equity in real estate projects or in
businesses in these communities. It does
so by enabling them to temporarily defer
and reduce their tax liability on
investments in privately- or publicly
managed Qualified Opportunity Funds.
These Qualified Opportunity Funds
must invest funds in real estate projects
or businesses located in designated
Opportunity Zones. Moreover, if
investors leave their investments in
these funds long-term, the profits they
make on their Qualified Opportunity
Fund investments will not be taxed.
Since the passage of the law,
Opportunity Zones (OZ) have been
designated in all 50 states, the District
of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and in Insular
Areas. The number of census tracts in a
State that were eligible for designation
as Opportunity Zones could not have
exceeded 25 percent of the number of
census tracts in the State that are ‘‘lowincome communities’’ (LIC).
Census tracts were eligible for
designation as Opportunity Zones if
they satisfied the definition of a ‘‘lowincome community’’ per § 45D(e) of the
Internal Revenue Code. The term ‘‘lowincome community’’ means any
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
48166
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2019 / Notices
population census tract where: (a) The
poverty rate for such tract is at least 20
percent, or (b)(i) in the case of a tract not
located within a metropolitan area, the
median family income for such tract
does not exceed 80 percent of statewide
median family income, or (b)(ii) in the
case of a tract located within a
metropolitan area, the median family
income for such tract does not exceed
80 percent of the greater of statewide
median family income or the
metropolitan area median family
income. For grantees who are familiar
with using New Market Tax Credits
(NMTC) as a source for community
development finance, these eligibility
criteria are the same as the requirements
necessary to qualify for NMTC. It is
worth noting that some non-LIC tracts
were also eligible for Opportunity Zone
designation if certain additional criteria
were met.
HUD notes that, with the target area
changes allowed by this Notice, grantees
have a unique chance to leverage
Qualified Opportunity Zone Fund
capital with NSP funds, along with
other HUD funding including CDBG
formula funds and Section 108 Loan
Guarantees, to accelerate activities in
Opportunity Zones. HUD will publish
further guidance which will provide
additional information related to how
program funds can be combined to
reinforce these strategies.
In the interim, when considering
strategies to facilitate the use of NSP
and CDBG funds in Opportunity Zones,
HUD encourages grantees to explore
whether these zones would also qualify
as Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy
Areas (NRSAs) under CPD Notice 16–
16. Through the designation of NRSAs,
compliance with certain HUD
requirements can be streamlined to
make it more feasible for grantees and
their partners to leverage CDBG and
Section 108 funds more quickly in
Opportunity Zones.
To effectuate these changes, HUD is
amending the Unified NSP Notice and
the NSP2 NOFA to eliminate the
requirement that NSP2 and NSP3
grantees use the HUD Foreclosure Need
website. Instead, HUD is requiring that
grantees meet the statutory requirement
to give priority emphasis and
consideration to areas with the greatest
need when distributing NSP funds.
Given that HERA only requires priority
emphasis and consideration and HUD’s
observation that grantees have largely
served their areas of greatest need, HUD
presumes that most, if not all, grantees
will now be able to serve other areas
within their jurisdiction.
NSP1 and NSP3 grantees amending
their NSP Action Plan substantial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
amendments or abbreviated plans or
NSP2 grantees amending their NSP2
applications to serve areas other than
those that were previously identified as
areas of greatest need must describe the
nature and extent of the need for
neighborhood stabilization in the
amendment, as set forth in the
requirements below. NSP grantees may
identify new target areas using local
data such as vacancies, home sales,
employment, assessments of single and
multi-family housing needs, realtor
information, etc. The amendment
should identify the factors used to select
the new target area and the grantee
should retain in its files all the raw data
used to identify the new target area.
NSP1 and NSP3 grantees must amend
their plans in accordance with 24 CFR
part 91. NSP2 grantees must submit any
amendments to the field office to
forward to HUD Headquarters for review
and approval.
NSP Program Income Transfers
This Notice also informs grantees of
HUD’s authority to cancel unexpended
grant balances and permits NSP grantees
to transfer streams of program income,
including future streams of program
income, from NSP to the CDBG program
with a single written HUD-approved
request.
There are 195 NSP1 grantees and 152
NSP3 grantees that have unexpended
grant funds totaling over $150 million in
their lines of credit. This occurred
because program income must be spent
prior to using grant funds, and many
communities earned significant
amounts of program income. With few
exceptions, grantees met their
expenditure deadlines and have
expended an additional $1.8B in
program income. An additional
$240,000,000 in program income has
not yet been expended. These
communities do not wish to return the
NSP funds because needs still remain,
often outside the areas identified as
areas of greatest need using HUD data.
HUD urges grantees to complete eligible
NSP activities and close out the
remainder of their grants but recognizes
that grantees have few or no properties
that are eligible to be assisted with NSP
funds in their identified target areas.
On June 14, 2016, HUD amended the
Closeout Notice to allow the transfer of
NSP program income to an open CDBG
formula entitlement grant or a unit of
general local government recipient of a
grant from a state. HUD made this
allowance to enable grantees to expend
remaining grant funds by moving
program income out of the NSP
program. The June 14, 2016 Notice
permitted transfers of program income
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on hand. This Notice expands that
flexibility to include transfers of a future
stream of program income from an
activity, eliminating the need for
multiple written requests to transfer
program income that is anticipated but
has not yet been received.
Potential for Recapture of Unused Grant
Funds
In addition, to ensure that NSP
grantees expend their grant balances
expeditiously, HUD is reminding them
that failure to draw funds from the line
of credit (whether obligated or
unobligated) for two consecutive fiscal
years may result in HUD determining
that need for the funds no longer exists,
cancelling the line of credit, and
proceeding to grant closeout in
accordance with 31 U.S.C. 1555.
Except as described in this notice and
previous notices governing NSP,
statutory and regulatory provisions
governing the CDBG program, including
those at 24 CFR part 570 subpart I for
states or, for CDBG units of general local
government, including those at 24 CFR
part 570 subparts A, C, D, J, K, and 0,
as appropriate, apply to the use of these
funds. The State of Hawaii was
allocated funds and will be subject to
part 570, subpart I, as modified by this
notice and previous notices governing
NSP.
III. Alternative Requirement and
Regulatory Waivers
1. Section II of the Unified NSP
Notice is amended to eliminate
paragraphs II.B.2.a.i and II.B.2.a.ii,
including the undesignated paragraph
added to that section by Federal
Register Notice, at 78 FR 29771–29772,
and Paragraph II.B.2.b.iii is revised to
read:
‘‘b. Information by activity describing how
the grantee will use the funds, identifying:
i. The areas of greatest need addressed by
the activity or activities or if addressing other
areas, the nature and extent for neighborhood
stabilization, including the local housing
market, credit, and employment needs
contributing to the decline, in the other
areas;’’
Section II of the NSP2 NOFA is
amended to eliminate paragraph II.B.8
and all references that paragraph.
Paragraph IV.A.1.a. is revised to read:
‘‘You must identify the specific geography
in which you will carry out your NSP2
Program, giving priority emphasis and
consideration to areas of greatest need. If you
are carrying out NSP2 activities in other
areas, you must identify the nature and
extent of need for neighborhood stabilization
in the other areas. At a minimum, the
narrative for this factor must address local
housing market, credit, and employment
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2019 / Notices
needs that are contributing to decline of the
targeted geography.’’
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
2. Section N of the Unified NSP
Notice and section N of Appendix I of
the NSP2 NOFA are amended by
revising paragraph 4 of each to read as
follows:
‘‘4. Transfer of Program Income Before
Closeout. With the exception of a nonprofit
NSP grantee, an NSP grantee may transfer unobligated NSP program income at any time
before closeout to its annual CDBG program,
or, if it is an UGLG that is also a State CDBG
grant recipient with an open grant, to its
State CDBG program using a single written
request to HUD. In addition, a State grantee
may transfer un-obligated NSP program
income before closeout to any annual CDBGfunded activities carried out by a UGLG or
Indian tribe within the State using a single
written request to HUD.
Transferred NSP program income will
become CDBG program income upon receipt
in the Integrated Disbursement and
Information System (IDIS). Prior to carrying
out a transfer, the grantee must submit a
written request for approval to the local HUD
field office to transfer un-obligated NSP
funds to CDBG, as prescribed by HUD.
Grantees may transfer: (1) The amount of
unobligated program income on hand; (2)
amounts of any expected un-obligated NSP
program income to be received; (3) an
unknown amount of future program income
from a specific NSP activity or activities; or
(4) a combination of the above. The grantee
must also provide the grant number and
activity number associated with the NSP
activity(ies) that generated or will generate
the program income and the name(s) of the
CDBG program grantee (or UGLG recipient, if
appropriate) to which the funds will transfer.
The request must include: (a) Proof that the
grantee has reconciled its own financial
records with the Disaster Recovery Grant
Reporting system (DRGR) and (b) an analysis
documenting compliance or expected
compliance, as established by HUD, with the
requirement at subparagraph E.2.e of the
Unified NSP Notice, 75 FR 64331, for NSP1
and NSP3 grantees, and subparagraph E.2.e
of Appendix I of the NSP2 NOFA for NSP2
grantees, which requires not less than 25
percent of any NSP funds to be used to house
individuals or families with incomes at or
below 50 percent of area median income
(LH25).
HUD will review the request for approval
and documentation provided against the
records in DRGR to ensure that the grantee
is only transferring un-obligated (on-hand)
program income or program income expected
to be received from identified NSP activities,
and that the LH25 requirement has been or
will be met.
After HUD approval, if NSP program
income funds have already been receipted in
DRGR, the grantee must first revise the DRGR
submission to subtract the amounts receipted
there prior to receipting any transferred
amounts in IDIS.
Further, the grantee must print and
maintain a record of the transfer(s). Finally,
the grantee is to email its local HUD field
office notifying it that transfer has been
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
completed and provide the IDIS program
income receipt. The transferred NSP program
income funds are not considered to be CDBG
funds until they have been documented in
IDIS.
Upon transfer, all program income must be
used and reported on in accordance with
CDBG program requirements. In addition, the
grantee must note in its current NSP
quarterly or annual (if grant has been closed
out) performance report the following
information:
• HUD approval of the transfer;
• Date of the approval;
• Amount of program income on hand and
amount of any expected program income to
be received that will be transferred; and
• Activity number that generated or will
generate the NSP program income. Any NSP
program income that is not transferred and
receipted in IDIS will retain its NSP
characteristics and requirements in
accordance with published notices governing
NSP.
3. Section X of the Unified NSP
Notice is amended to add the following
language at the end of the paragraph:
‘‘Note that NSP I and NSP3 grant funds are
subject to 31 U.S.C. 1555, which states, ‘‘An
appropriation account available for
obligation for an indefinite period shall be
closed, and any remaining balance (whether
obligated or unobligated) in that account
shall be canceled and thereafter shall not be
available for obligation or expenditure for
any purpose, if (1) the head of the agency
concerned or the President determines that
the purposes for which the appropriation was
made have been carried out; and (2) no
disbursement has been made against the
appropriation for two consecutive fiscal
years.’’
4. Under the ‘‘Background’’
subheading in section Z of the Unified
NSP Notice, the Program Income
paragraphs are amended to read as
follows:
‘‘Program Income. NSP program income
received at the time of or after closeout may
be transferred to an annual CDBG program as
provided in section N and transferred funds
will become CDBG program income upon
receipt in IDIS (such receipt in IDIS will be
subsequent to edits to remove receipt of the
funds in DRGR, if such receipt was already
entered). Upon transfer, CDBG program
income will be subject to all CDBG statutory
and regulatory requirements for program
income.
Any NSP program income not transferred
to CDBG shall, subject to the de minimis
exception provided for in section Y of the
NSP Closeout Notice, continue to be used in
accordance with NSP requirements. If annual
NSP program income does not exceed
$25,000, the funds shall be used for general
administrative costs related to ensuring
continued affordability of NSP units or added
to the grantee’s CDBG program income
receipts and the CDBG requirements at 24
CFR 570.500(a)(4) shall apply, which may
exclude such amounts from the definition of
program income. Funds not transferred to
CDBG will retain NSP characteristics and be
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48167
subject to NSP requirements, so the
additional flexibility created by the
legislation for the creation of financing
mechanisms, development of new housing,
operation of land banks, and service of
families up to 120 percent of Area Median
Income (AMI), will remain in place.
However, HUD notes that continued
acquisition of new land bank property after
closeout with NSP program income could
undermine the urgency of finding uses for
the properties already acquired. Grantees will
be required to allocate not less than 25
percent of NSP program income to housing
for families with incomes at or below 50
percent of AMI when the amount of annual
program income received by a grantee is
sufficient to make application of this
requirement reasonable. HUD has defined
this amount as $250,000 in section Y of the
NSP Closeout Notice.
After grant closeout, former NSP grantees
that are CDBG entitlements or States will
report at least annually as provided for by
HUD on the receipt and use of NSP program
income, and on the disposition of landbanked properties. These grantees must also
include NSP program income in the annual
CDBG Action Plan or substantial amendment
in accordance with CDBG requirements. All
former NSP grantees, including nonprofits
and non-entitlement units of general local
government receiving funds directly from
HUD, must report at least annually in a form
acceptable to the Secretary regarding
enforcement of any NSP continuing
affordability restrictions. Reporting will
continue over the course of the minimum
period of affordability set forth in HOME
program standards at 24 CFR 92.252 (e) and
92.254(a)(4).
Finally, most program income will be
received by CDBG entitlement cities and
counties, and by states, which have systems
and procedures to manage NSP revenues,
which are treated in most respects like CDBG
revenues. However, NSP2 nonprofit grantees
and/or nonprofit consortium members in
NSP2 grant consortia that receive revenues
generated by NSP projects will not have
access to the state and municipal CDBG
tracking systems. Further, the CDBG
regulations and Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) circular implemented at 24
CFR 84.24(e) or 2 CFR 200.307(f), as
applicable, do not require that nonprofit
grantees continue to treat revenues generated
from use of NSP funds and received after
grant closeout as federal funds unless HUD
regulations or the terms and conditions of the
award provide otherwise. Thus, for NSP2
grantees that are not direct formula CDBG
grantees (nonprofits and non-entitlement
local governments, including those that are
part of a consortium), HUD is requiring that
revenues generated by projects funded before
closeout but received within 5 years after
grant closeout must be used for NSP-eligible
activities and meet NSP benefit requirements,
but no other federal requirements would
apply. With the exception of income earned
from the sale of NSP-assisted real property or
loans, any income earned by such postcloseout use of funds would not be governed
by any NSP requirements and would be
miscellaneous revenues, although HUD
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
48168
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2019 / Notices
encourages such grantees to apply NSP
principles to subsequent uses of the funds.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
5. The paragraphs in section Z under
the ‘‘Requirements’’ subheading, are
amended to read as follows:
‘‘Transfer of Program Income After
Closeout.
1. Program Income. Gross revenues
received by NSP grantees after closeout will
be governed by the following requirements:
i. After requesting approval from the local
HUD field office in writing, as set forth in
paragraph N.4, and receiving prior written
approval, the grantee may receipt the
amounts to IDIS (after first revising any
DRGR entries related to the funds) and add
them to the grantee’s CDBG program income
receipts and all relevant CDBG program
income requirements shall then apply. HUD
will review and approve or deny a transfer
consistent with paragraph N.4. Grantees must
also provide proof of the program income
transfer and submit information in their
performance report as set forth in paragraph
N.4.
ii. If the amounts are not receipted in IDIS,
annual amounts of program income in excess
of $25,000 shall be used in accordance with
all NSP requirements for eligible NSP
properties, uses, and activities, including
new construction, financing mechanisms,
and management and disposition of land
bank property.
b. If annual NSP program income does not
exceed $25,000, the funds shall be used for
general administrative costs related to
ensuring continued affordability of NSP units
or added to the grantee’s CDBG program
income receipts and the CDBG requirements
at 24 CFR 570.500(a)(4) shall apply, which
may exclude such amounts from the
definition of program income.
c. NSP program income may provide
benefit to individuals and families with
incomes up to 120 percent of AMI as
permitted in NSP under section II.E;
d. If a grantee’s annual NSP program
income exceeds $250,000 (after any transfer
of program income to CDBG), 25 percent of
the program income shall be used to house
individuals or families at or below 50 percent
of AMI; in instances in which a grantee’s
annual NSP program income does not exceed
$250,000, the requirements of paragraph
II.E.2.e do not apply.
e. NSP2 grantees that are not CDBG
entitlement communities or States must use
post-closeout revenues generated from NSPassisted activities that were funded before
closeout for NSP purposes. If the grantee
does not have another ongoing CDBG grant
received directly from HUD at the time of
closeout, then in accordance with 24 CFR
570.504(b)(5), income received after closeout
from the disposition of real property or from
loans outstanding at the time of closeout
shall not be governed by NSP or CDBG rules,
except that such income shall be used for
activities that meet one of the national
objectives in 24 CFR 570.208 and the
eligibility requirements described in section
105 of the HCD Act. The provisions of 24
CFR 570.504(b)(5) are waived to limit its
application to income received within 5
years of grant closeout. Any income received
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
5 years after grant closeout, as well as
program income from funds outlaid after the
date of the closeout agreement may be used
without restriction. Such grantees are
encouraged to use such funds in accordance
with the principles above.
f. States may continue to act directly to
implement NSP activities post-closeout.
g. HUD will provide direction to grantees
by the date of closeout on procedures for
reporting and tracking NSP program income
revenues. Tracking will continue in DRGR
until IDIS enhancements to allow NSP
property registry and program income
tracking are developed and released.’’
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers for grants made
under NSP are as follows: 14.218;
14.225; and 14.228.
Paperwork Reduction Act
HUD has approval from OMB for
information collection requirements in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). OMB approval is under OMB
control number 2506–0165, 2506–0185,
2506–0117, and 2506–0193. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct,
or sponsor and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of
information, unless the collection
displays a valid control number.
Environmental Review
A Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in
accordance with HUD regulations at 24
CFR part 50, which implement section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)). The FONSI is available for
public inspection between the hours of
8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in the
Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street
SW, Room 10276, Washington, DC
20410. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, please
schedule an appointment to review the
FONSI by calling the Regulations
Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay at 800–877–8339 (this
is a toll-free number).
Dated: August 30, 2019.
David C. Woll, Jr.,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Community Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2019–19708 Filed 9–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2019–0087;
FXES11130400000EA–123–FF04EF1000]
Receipt of Incidental Take Permit
Application and Proposed Habitat
Conservation Plan for the Scrub-Jay,
Volusia County, FL; Categorical
Exclusion
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comment and information.
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce receipt of
an application from KBC Development
(applicant) for an incidental take permit
(ITP) under the Endangered Species Act.
The applicant requests the ITP to take
the federally listed scrub-jay incidental
to construction in Volusia County,
Florida. We request public comment on
the application, which includes the
applicant’s proposed habitat
conservation plan (HCP), and the
Service’s preliminary determination that
this HCP qualifies as ‘‘low-effect,’’
categorically excluded, under the
National Environmental Policy Act. To
make this determination, we used our
environmental action statement and
low-effect screening form, both of which
are also available for public review.
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on or before October 15,
2019.
SUMMARY:
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may
obtain copies of the documents online
in Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2019–0087
at https://www.regulations.gov.
Submitting Comments: If you wish to
submit comments on any of the
documents, you may do so in writing by
any of the following methods:
• Online: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–
2019–0087.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2019–0087; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS: JAO/1N, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
M. Gawera, by telephone at 904–731–
3121 or via email at erin_gawera@
fws.gov.
We, the
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
announce receipt of an application from
KBC Development for an incidental take
permit (ITP) under the Endangered
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48165-48168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19708]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-6170-N-01]
Notice of Neighborhood Stabilization Program; Changes to Closeout
Requirements Related to Program Income Amendment
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice describes changes to closeout requirements applied
to, and additional regulations waived for, grantees receiving grants in
the three rounds of funding under the Neighborhood Stabilization
Program, who are also grantees in the Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program.
DATES: Applicable Date: September 12, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessie Handforth Kome, Acting
Director, Office of Block Grant Assistance, Office of Community
Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street SW, Room 7282, Washington, DC 20410; telephone
number 202-708-3587 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay at 800-877-8339 (this is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) was established by
Division B, Title III of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
(HERA) (Pub. L. 110-289, approved July 30, 2008), for the stabilization
of communities that have suffered from residential foreclosures and
abandonment. As established by HERA, NSP provided grants to all states
and selected local governments on a formula basis. The American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) (division A, title
XII of Pub. L. 111-5, approved February 17, 2009) authorized additional
NSP grants to be awarded to states, local governments, nonprofits and a
consortium of nonprofit entities, but on a competitive basis. The
Recovery Act also authorized funding for national and local technical
assistance providers to support NSP grantees. The Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) (Pub. L.
111-203, approved July 21, 2010) authorized a third round of NSP grants
to all states and select units of general local governments (UGLG) on a
formula basis.
The purpose of the funds awarded under the three rounds of NSP is
to target the stabilization of neighborhoods negatively affected by
residential properties that have been foreclosed upon or abandoned. The
Notice of Formula Allocations and Program Requirements for Neighborhood
Stabilization Program Formula Grants, published October 19, 2010 (75 FR
64322) (``Unified NSP Notice''), as amended, provides further
background for these programs, the program principles, and the
objectives and outcomes of the NSP program. The Notice of Neighborhood
Stabilization Program; Closeout Requirements and Recapture (Closeout
Notice), published November 27, 2012 (77 FR 70799), as amended, amended
the Unified NSP Notice by adding grant closeout and related provisions.
In addition, the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the
Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act, 2009, 74 FR 21377 (May 7, 2009), as amended by
subsequent notices (``NSP2 NOFA''), includes requirements specific to
the competitive round of funding under the Recovery Act.
II. This Notice
The primary purpose of this Notice is to hasten the expenditure of
remaining grant funds to facilitate closeout of all open NSP grants,
given that most originally planned program activities are at or near
completion. To facilitate that purpose, this notice eliminates the
requirement that NSP2 and NSP3 grantees must use the HUD Foreclosure
Need website to identify new target areas before using NSP funds. It
also provides additional guidance related to NSP program income, as
well as encourages the use of existing Community Development Block
Grant formula funds to leverage investments in targeted areas.
Targeting New Areas of Need
For all three rounds of NSP, HERA required that grantees give
priority emphasis to geographic areas of greatest need. To implement
this requirement, HUD developed a Foreclosure Need website and mapping
tools and required NSP2 and NSP3 grantees to use the HUD data to
identify target areas with an individual or average combined index
score of not less than lesser of 17 or the 20th percentile most needy
score in an individual state. NSP1 grantees were encouraged, but not
required, to use the HUD data. Because the program has expended 98% of
the $8.639 billion in grant funds and program income, HUD is no longer
updating the Foreclosure Need websites and mapping tools. Moreover, HUD
has observed that grantees have largely served their identified areas
of greatest need.
In identifying new target areas, HUD supports the ability of NSP
grantees to use these funds in Opportunity Zones. Created by the 2017
Tax Cut and Jobs Act, the Opportunity Zone tax incentives are designed
to stimulate private investment in designated, low-income census tracts
and allows individuals and companies to invest equity in real estate
projects or in businesses in these communities. It does so by enabling
them to temporarily defer and reduce their tax liability on investments
in privately- or publicly managed Qualified Opportunity Funds. These
Qualified Opportunity Funds must invest funds in real estate projects
or businesses located in designated Opportunity Zones. Moreover, if
investors leave their investments in these funds long-term, the profits
they make on their Qualified Opportunity Fund investments will not be
taxed. Since the passage of the law, Opportunity Zones (OZ) have been
designated in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and
in Insular Areas. The number of census tracts in a State that were
eligible for designation as Opportunity Zones could not have exceeded
25 percent of the number of census tracts in the State that are ``low-
income communities'' (LIC).
Census tracts were eligible for designation as Opportunity Zones if
they satisfied the definition of a ``low-income community'' per Sec.
45D(e) of the Internal Revenue Code. The term ``low-income community''
means any
[[Page 48166]]
population census tract where: (a) The poverty rate for such tract is
at least 20 percent, or (b)(i) in the case of a tract not located
within a metropolitan area, the median family income for such tract
does not exceed 80 percent of statewide median family income, or
(b)(ii) in the case of a tract located within a metropolitan area, the
median family income for such tract does not exceed 80 percent of the
greater of statewide median family income or the metropolitan area
median family income. For grantees who are familiar with using New
Market Tax Credits (NMTC) as a source for community development
finance, these eligibility criteria are the same as the requirements
necessary to qualify for NMTC. It is worth noting that some non-LIC
tracts were also eligible for Opportunity Zone designation if certain
additional criteria were met.
HUD notes that, with the target area changes allowed by this
Notice, grantees have a unique chance to leverage Qualified Opportunity
Zone Fund capital with NSP funds, along with other HUD funding
including CDBG formula funds and Section 108 Loan Guarantees, to
accelerate activities in Opportunity Zones. HUD will publish further
guidance which will provide additional information related to how
program funds can be combined to reinforce these strategies.
In the interim, when considering strategies to facilitate the use
of NSP and CDBG funds in Opportunity Zones, HUD encourages grantees to
explore whether these zones would also qualify as Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Areas (NRSAs) under CPD Notice 16-16. Through
the designation of NRSAs, compliance with certain HUD requirements can
be streamlined to make it more feasible for grantees and their partners
to leverage CDBG and Section 108 funds more quickly in Opportunity
Zones.
To effectuate these changes, HUD is amending the Unified NSP Notice
and the NSP2 NOFA to eliminate the requirement that NSP2 and NSP3
grantees use the HUD Foreclosure Need website. Instead, HUD is
requiring that grantees meet the statutory requirement to give priority
emphasis and consideration to areas with the greatest need when
distributing NSP funds. Given that HERA only requires priority emphasis
and consideration and HUD's observation that grantees have largely
served their areas of greatest need, HUD presumes that most, if not
all, grantees will now be able to serve other areas within their
jurisdiction.
NSP1 and NSP3 grantees amending their NSP Action Plan substantial
amendments or abbreviated plans or NSP2 grantees amending their NSP2
applications to serve areas other than those that were previously
identified as areas of greatest need must describe the nature and
extent of the need for neighborhood stabilization in the amendment, as
set forth in the requirements below. NSP grantees may identify new
target areas using local data such as vacancies, home sales,
employment, assessments of single and multi-family housing needs,
realtor information, etc. The amendment should identify the factors
used to select the new target area and the grantee should retain in its
files all the raw data used to identify the new target area. NSP1 and
NSP3 grantees must amend their plans in accordance with 24 CFR part 91.
NSP2 grantees must submit any amendments to the field office to forward
to HUD Headquarters for review and approval.
NSP Program Income Transfers
This Notice also informs grantees of HUD's authority to cancel
unexpended grant balances and permits NSP grantees to transfer streams
of program income, including future streams of program income, from NSP
to the CDBG program with a single written HUD-approved request.
There are 195 NSP1 grantees and 152 NSP3 grantees that have
unexpended grant funds totaling over $150 million in their lines of
credit. This occurred because program income must be spent prior to
using grant funds, and many communities earned significant amounts of
program income. With few exceptions, grantees met their expenditure
deadlines and have expended an additional $1.8B in program income. An
additional $240,000,000 in program income has not yet been expended.
These communities do not wish to return the NSP funds because needs
still remain, often outside the areas identified as areas of greatest
need using HUD data. HUD urges grantees to complete eligible NSP
activities and close out the remainder of their grants but recognizes
that grantees have few or no properties that are eligible to be
assisted with NSP funds in their identified target areas.
On June 14, 2016, HUD amended the Closeout Notice to allow the
transfer of NSP program income to an open CDBG formula entitlement
grant or a unit of general local government recipient of a grant from a
state. HUD made this allowance to enable grantees to expend remaining
grant funds by moving program income out of the NSP program. The June
14, 2016 Notice permitted transfers of program income on hand. This
Notice expands that flexibility to include transfers of a future stream
of program income from an activity, eliminating the need for multiple
written requests to transfer program income that is anticipated but has
not yet been received.
Potential for Recapture of Unused Grant Funds
In addition, to ensure that NSP grantees expend their grant
balances expeditiously, HUD is reminding them that failure to draw
funds from the line of credit (whether obligated or unobligated) for
two consecutive fiscal years may result in HUD determining that need
for the funds no longer exists, cancelling the line of credit, and
proceeding to grant closeout in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 1555.
Except as described in this notice and previous notices governing
NSP, statutory and regulatory provisions governing the CDBG program,
including those at 24 CFR part 570 subpart I for states or, for CDBG
units of general local government, including those at 24 CFR part 570
subparts A, C, D, J, K, and 0, as appropriate, apply to the use of
these funds. The State of Hawaii was allocated funds and will be
subject to part 570, subpart I, as modified by this notice and previous
notices governing NSP.
III. Alternative Requirement and Regulatory Waivers
1. Section II of the Unified NSP Notice is amended to eliminate
paragraphs II.B.2.a.i and II.B.2.a.ii, including the undesignated
paragraph added to that section by Federal Register Notice, at 78 FR
29771-29772, and Paragraph II.B.2.b.iii is revised to read:
``b. Information by activity describing how the grantee will use
the funds, identifying:
i. The areas of greatest need addressed by the activity or
activities or if addressing other areas, the nature and extent for
neighborhood stabilization, including the local housing market,
credit, and employment needs contributing to the decline, in the
other areas;''
Section II of the NSP2 NOFA is amended to eliminate paragraph
II.B.8 and all references that paragraph. Paragraph IV.A.1.a. is
revised to read:
``You must identify the specific geography in which you will
carry out your NSP2 Program, giving priority emphasis and
consideration to areas of greatest need. If you are carrying out
NSP2 activities in other areas, you must identify the nature and
extent of need for neighborhood stabilization in the other areas. At
a minimum, the narrative for this factor must address local housing
market, credit, and employment
[[Page 48167]]
needs that are contributing to decline of the targeted geography.''
2. Section N of the Unified NSP Notice and section N of Appendix I
of the NSP2 NOFA are amended by revising paragraph 4 of each to read as
follows:
``4. Transfer of Program Income Before Closeout. With the
exception of a nonprofit NSP grantee, an NSP grantee may transfer
un-obligated NSP program income at any time before closeout to its
annual CDBG program, or, if it is an UGLG that is also a State CDBG
grant recipient with an open grant, to its State CDBG program using
a single written request to HUD. In addition, a State grantee may
transfer un-obligated NSP program income before closeout to any
annual CDBG-funded activities carried out by a UGLG or Indian tribe
within the State using a single written request to HUD.
Transferred NSP program income will become CDBG program income
upon receipt in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System
(IDIS). Prior to carrying out a transfer, the grantee must submit a
written request for approval to the local HUD field office to
transfer un-obligated NSP funds to CDBG, as prescribed by HUD.
Grantees may transfer: (1) The amount of unobligated program income
on hand; (2) amounts of any expected un-obligated NSP program income
to be received; (3) an unknown amount of future program income from
a specific NSP activity or activities; or (4) a combination of the
above. The grantee must also provide the grant number and activity
number associated with the NSP activity(ies) that generated or will
generate the program income and the name(s) of the CDBG program
grantee (or UGLG recipient, if appropriate) to which the funds will
transfer. The request must include: (a) Proof that the grantee has
reconciled its own financial records with the Disaster Recovery
Grant Reporting system (DRGR) and (b) an analysis documenting
compliance or expected compliance, as established by HUD, with the
requirement at subparagraph E.2.e of the Unified NSP Notice, 75 FR
64331, for NSP1 and NSP3 grantees, and subparagraph E.2.e of
Appendix I of the NSP2 NOFA for NSP2 grantees, which requires not
less than 25 percent of any NSP funds to be used to house
individuals or families with incomes at or below 50 percent of area
median income (LH25).
HUD will review the request for approval and documentation
provided against the records in DRGR to ensure that the grantee is
only transferring un-obligated (on-hand) program income or program
income expected to be received from identified NSP activities, and
that the LH25 requirement has been or will be met.
After HUD approval, if NSP program income funds have already
been receipted in DRGR, the grantee must first revise the DRGR
submission to subtract the amounts receipted there prior to
receipting any transferred amounts in IDIS.
Further, the grantee must print and maintain a record of the
transfer(s). Finally, the grantee is to email its local HUD field
office notifying it that transfer has been completed and provide the
IDIS program income receipt. The transferred NSP program income
funds are not considered to be CDBG funds until they have been
documented in IDIS.
Upon transfer, all program income must be used and reported on
in accordance with CDBG program requirements. In addition, the
grantee must note in its current NSP quarterly or annual (if grant
has been closed out) performance report the following information:
HUD approval of the transfer;
Date of the approval;
Amount of program income on hand and amount of any
expected program income to be received that will be transferred; and
Activity number that generated or will generate the NSP
program income. Any NSP program income that is not transferred and
receipted in IDIS will retain its NSP characteristics and
requirements in accordance with published notices governing NSP.
3. Section X of the Unified NSP Notice is amended to add the
following language at the end of the paragraph:
``Note that NSP I and NSP3 grant funds are subject to 31 U.S.C.
1555, which states, ``An appropriation account available for
obligation for an indefinite period shall be closed, and any
remaining balance (whether obligated or unobligated) in that account
shall be canceled and thereafter shall not be available for
obligation or expenditure for any purpose, if (1) the head of the
agency concerned or the President determines that the purposes for
which the appropriation was made have been carried out; and (2) no
disbursement has been made against the appropriation for two
consecutive fiscal years.''
4. Under the ``Background'' subheading in section Z of the Unified
NSP Notice, the Program Income paragraphs are amended to read as
follows:
``Program Income. NSP program income received at the time of or
after closeout may be transferred to an annual CDBG program as
provided in section N and transferred funds will become CDBG program
income upon receipt in IDIS (such receipt in IDIS will be subsequent
to edits to remove receipt of the funds in DRGR, if such receipt was
already entered). Upon transfer, CDBG program income will be subject
to all CDBG statutory and regulatory requirements for program
income.
Any NSP program income not transferred to CDBG shall, subject to
the de minimis exception provided for in section Y of the NSP
Closeout Notice, continue to be used in accordance with NSP
requirements. If annual NSP program income does not exceed $25,000,
the funds shall be used for general administrative costs related to
ensuring continued affordability of NSP units or added to the
grantee's CDBG program income receipts and the CDBG requirements at
24 CFR 570.500(a)(4) shall apply, which may exclude such amounts
from the definition of program income. Funds not transferred to CDBG
will retain NSP characteristics and be subject to NSP requirements,
so the additional flexibility created by the legislation for the
creation of financing mechanisms, development of new housing,
operation of land banks, and service of families up to 120 percent
of Area Median Income (AMI), will remain in place. However, HUD
notes that continued acquisition of new land bank property after
closeout with NSP program income could undermine the urgency of
finding uses for the properties already acquired. Grantees will be
required to allocate not less than 25 percent of NSP program income
to housing for families with incomes at or below 50 percent of AMI
when the amount of annual program income received by a grantee is
sufficient to make application of this requirement reasonable. HUD
has defined this amount as $250,000 in section Y of the NSP Closeout
Notice.
After grant closeout, former NSP grantees that are CDBG
entitlements or States will report at least annually as provided for
by HUD on the receipt and use of NSP program income, and on the
disposition of land-banked properties. These grantees must also
include NSP program income in the annual CDBG Action Plan or
substantial amendment in accordance with CDBG requirements. All
former NSP grantees, including nonprofits and non-entitlement units
of general local government receiving funds directly from HUD, must
report at least annually in a form acceptable to the Secretary
regarding enforcement of any NSP continuing affordability
restrictions. Reporting will continue over the course of the minimum
period of affordability set forth in HOME program standards at 24
CFR 92.252 (e) and 92.254(a)(4).
Finally, most program income will be received by CDBG
entitlement cities and counties, and by states, which have systems
and procedures to manage NSP revenues, which are treated in most
respects like CDBG revenues. However, NSP2 nonprofit grantees and/or
nonprofit consortium members in NSP2 grant consortia that receive
revenues generated by NSP projects will not have access to the state
and municipal CDBG tracking systems. Further, the CDBG regulations
and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circular implemented at 24
CFR 84.24(e) or 2 CFR 200.307(f), as applicable, do not require that
nonprofit grantees continue to treat revenues generated from use of
NSP funds and received after grant closeout as federal funds unless
HUD regulations or the terms and conditions of the award provide
otherwise. Thus, for NSP2 grantees that are not direct formula CDBG
grantees (nonprofits and non-entitlement local governments,
including those that are part of a consortium), HUD is requiring
that revenues generated by projects funded before closeout but
received within 5 years after grant closeout must be used for NSP-
eligible activities and meet NSP benefit requirements, but no other
federal requirements would apply. With the exception of income
earned from the sale of NSP-assisted real property or loans, any
income earned by such post-closeout use of funds would not be
governed by any NSP requirements and would be miscellaneous
revenues, although HUD
[[Page 48168]]
encourages such grantees to apply NSP principles to subsequent uses
of the funds.
5. The paragraphs in section Z under the ``Requirements''
subheading, are amended to read as follows:
``Transfer of Program Income After Closeout.
1. Program Income. Gross revenues received by NSP grantees after
closeout will be governed by the following requirements:
i. After requesting approval from the local HUD field office in
writing, as set forth in paragraph N.4, and receiving prior written
approval, the grantee may receipt the amounts to IDIS (after first
revising any DRGR entries related to the funds) and add them to the
grantee's CDBG program income receipts and all relevant CDBG program
income requirements shall then apply. HUD will review and approve or
deny a transfer consistent with paragraph N.4. Grantees must also
provide proof of the program income transfer and submit information
in their performance report as set forth in paragraph N.4.
ii. If the amounts are not receipted in IDIS, annual amounts of
program income in excess of $25,000 shall be used in accordance with
all NSP requirements for eligible NSP properties, uses, and
activities, including new construction, financing mechanisms, and
management and disposition of land bank property.
b. If annual NSP program income does not exceed $25,000, the
funds shall be used for general administrative costs related to
ensuring continued affordability of NSP units or added to the
grantee's CDBG program income receipts and the CDBG requirements at
24 CFR 570.500(a)(4) shall apply, which may exclude such amounts
from the definition of program income.
c. NSP program income may provide benefit to individuals and
families with incomes up to 120 percent of AMI as permitted in NSP
under section II.E;
d. If a grantee's annual NSP program income exceeds $250,000
(after any transfer of program income to CDBG), 25 percent of the
program income shall be used to house individuals or families at or
below 50 percent of AMI; in instances in which a grantee's annual
NSP program income does not exceed $250,000, the requirements of
paragraph II.E.2.e do not apply.
e. NSP2 grantees that are not CDBG entitlement communities or
States must use post-closeout revenues generated from NSP-assisted
activities that were funded before closeout for NSP purposes. If the
grantee does not have another ongoing CDBG grant received directly
from HUD at the time of closeout, then in accordance with 24 CFR
570.504(b)(5), income received after closeout from the disposition
of real property or from loans outstanding at the time of closeout
shall not be governed by NSP or CDBG rules, except that such income
shall be used for activities that meet one of the national
objectives in 24 CFR 570.208 and the eligibility requirements
described in section 105 of the HCD Act. The provisions of 24 CFR
570.504(b)(5) are waived to limit its application to income received
within 5 years of grant closeout. Any income received 5 years after
grant closeout, as well as program income from funds outlaid after
the date of the closeout agreement may be used without restriction.
Such grantees are encouraged to use such funds in accordance with
the principles above.
f. States may continue to act directly to implement NSP
activities post-closeout.
g. HUD will provide direction to grantees by the date of
closeout on procedures for reporting and tracking NSP program income
revenues. Tracking will continue in DRGR until IDIS enhancements to
allow NSP property registry and program income tracking are
developed and released.''
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers for grants made
under NSP are as follows: 14.218; 14.225; and 14.228.
Paperwork Reduction Act
HUD has approval from OMB for information collection requirements
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). OMB approval is under OMB control number 2506-0165, 2506-0185,
2506-0117, and 2506-0193. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act, HUD may not conduct, or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless the collection displays
a valid control number.
Environmental Review
A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR
part 50, which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The FONSI is
available for public inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
weekdays in the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW,
Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410. Due to security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, please schedule an appointment to review the
FONSI by calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-3055 (this is not
a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay at 800-877-8339
(this is a toll-free number).
Dated: August 30, 2019.
David C. Woll, Jr.,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development.
[FR Doc. 2019-19708 Filed 9-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P