Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia; Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan for Nitrogen Oxides Under the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 47914-47923 [2019-19669]
Download as PDF
47914
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Diseases Society of America and
American Gastroenterological
Association). What impact has this had
on patient recruitment and conduct of
clinical trials?
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Future and Path Forward
• What additional scientific
information is needed to determine the
safety and effectiveness of FMT for C.
difficile infection not responsive to
standard therapies?
• How generalizable are the existing
safety and effectiveness data on use of
a specific FMT product for C. difficile
infection not responsive to standard
therapies to other FMT products for
which safety and effectiveness data are
not available?
• Please comment on how FDA can
facilitate patient access, protect patient
safety, and include enough flexibility to
support innovation for the development
and licensure of safe and effective FMT
products for C. difficile infection not
responsive to standard therapies.
III. Participating in the Public Hearing
Registration and Requests to Speak
and for Formal Oral Presentations: The
FDA Conference Center at the White
Oak location is a Federal facility with
security procedures and limited seating.
Attendance will be free. An agenda for
the hearing and any other background
materials will be made available on
October 25, 2019, at https://
www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/
news-events-biologics/workshopsmeetings-conferences-biologics. If you
need special accommodations because
of a disability, please contact Sherri
Revell or Loni Warren Henderson at
240–402–8010 at least 7 days before the
hearing.
For those interested in speaking at the
hearing or presenting at the hearing
with a formal oral presentation, please
register at https://www.eventbrite.com/
e/use-of-fecal-microbiota-fortransplantation-to-treat-clostridiumdifficile-infection-not-responsive-tickets63906239282 as ‘‘In-person presenter.’’
Speaker and presenter registrations are
due October 8, 2019.
FDA will try to accommodate all
persons who wish to make a formal oral
presentation. Formal oral presenters
may use an accompanying slide deck.
Individuals wishing to present should
identify their name, which stakeholder
group they represent (e.g., patient,
clinician, research scientist, industry,
stool bank), and the number of the
specific question, or questions, they
wish to address. FDA will consider this
information when organizing the
agenda. Individuals and organizations
with common interests should consider
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
consolidating or coordinating their
presentations and request time for a
joint presentation. Individual
organizations are limited to a single
presentation slot. FDA will notify
registered presenters of their scheduled
presentation times on October 21, 2019.
The time allotted for each presentation
will depend on the number of
individuals who wish to speak. If
registered presenters are using an
accompanying slide deck, those
presenters must submit an electronic
copy of their presentation (PowerPoint
or PDF) to CBERPublicEvents@
fda.hhs.gov on or before October 28,
2019. Persons registered to present are
encouraged to arrive at the hearing room
early and check in at the onsite
registration table to confirm their
designated presentation time. Actual
presentation times, however, may vary
based on how the hearing progresses in
real time.
In-person attendance: For those who
would like to attend in-person, but who
are not making a formal presentation,
please register at https://
www.eventbrite.com/e/use-of-fecalmicrobiota-for-transplantation-to-treatclostridium-difficile-infection-notresponsive-tickets-63906239282 as ‘‘Inperson attendee—no participation.’’
Seating is limited, and early registration
is recommended to allow for broad
participation.
Streaming Webcast of the Public
Hearing: For those unable to attend in
person, FDA will provide a live webcast
of the hearing. Please register at https://
www.eventbrite.com/e/use-of-fecalmicrobiota-for-transplantation-to-treatclostridium-difficile-infection-notresponsive-tickets-63906239282 as
‘‘online (webcast only)’’.
Media: Please register at https://
www.eventbrite.com/e/use-of-fecalmicrobiota-for-transplantation-to-treatclostridium-difficile-infection-notresponsive-tickets-63906239282 as
‘‘Media’’ by October 28, 2019.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as
soon as a transcript is available, it will
be accessible at https://www.fda.gov/
vaccines-blood-biologics/news-eventsbiologics/workshops-meetingsconferences-biologics and https://
www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed
at the Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES).
IV. Notification of Hearing Under 21
CFR Part 15
The Commissioner of Food and Drugs
is announcing that the public hearing
will be held in accordance with part 15
(21 CFR part 15). The hearing will be
conducted by a presiding officer, who
will be accompanied by FDA senior
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
management officials. Under § 15.30(f)
(21 CFR 15.30(f)), the hearing is
informal and the rules of evidence do
not apply. No participant may interrupt
the presentation of another participant.
Only the presiding officer and panel
members may question any person
during or at the conclusion of each
presentation. Public hearings under part
15 are subject to FDA’s policy and
procedures for electronic media
coverage of FDA’s public administrative
proceedings (21 CFR part 10, subpart C).
Under 21 CFR 10.205, representatives
of the electronic media may be
permitted, subject to certain limitations,
to videotape, film, or otherwise record
FDA’s public administrative
proceedings, including presentations by
participants. Persons attending FDA’s
public hearings are advised that the
Agency is not responsible for providing
access to electrical outlets.
The hearing will be transcribed as
stipulated in § 15.30(b) (see section III of
this document). To the extent that the
conditions for the hearing, as described
in this notification, conflict with any
provisions set out in part 15, this
notification acts as a waiver of those
provisions as specified in § 15.30(h).
Dated: September 5, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–19643 Filed 9–10–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0207; FRL–9999–64–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; District
of Columbia; Reasonably Available
Control Technology State
Implementation Plan for Nitrogen
Oxides Under the 2008 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the District of Columbia.
This revision pertains to reasonably
available control technology (RACT)
requirements for nitrogen oxides (NOX)
under the 2008 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standard (2008
ozone NAAQS). The District of
Columbia’s submittal for the NOX RACT
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS: Amends
existing regulatory provisions to add
new or more stringent regulations or
controls that represent RACT control
levels for combustion turbines and
associated heat recovery steam
generators and duct burners, amends the
applicability provisions of these
regulations to include all combustion
turbines and associated heat recovery
steam generators and duct burners, and
adds definitions; includes a source
specific NOX RACT determination for
four specific emissions units at one
major stationary source of NOX;
includes a certification that, for other
categories of sources, NOX RACT
controls already approved by EPA into
the District of Columbia’s SIP for
previous ozone NAAQS are based on
currently available technically and
economically feasible controls and
continue to represent NOX RACT for
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
implementation purposes; and (4)
removes carbon monoxide emissions
limits for combustion turbines that no
longer exist in the District of Columbia.
This action is being taken under the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before October 11, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2019–0207 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
Mr.
Christopher Cripps, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. The telephone number is (215)
814–2179. Mr. Cripps can also be
reached via electronic mail at
cripps.christopher@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
29, 2018, and as supplemented on
December 19, 2018, the District of
Columbia’s Department of Energy and
Environmental (DOEE) submitted a
revision to its SIP that addresses the
requirements of NOX RACT under the
2008 ozone NAAQS (‘‘Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)
for Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX)
Determination for the 2008 8-Hour
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS)—Final’’) dated
August 29, 2018 with amendments to its
NOX control regulations and an
operating permit setting RACT for
certain specific emissions units at one
major stationary source of NOX
(hereafter 2008 NOX RACT
Submission).1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
A. 1-Hour, 1997, and 2008 Ozone
NAAQS
Ground level ozone is not emitted
directly into the air but is created by
chemical reaction between NOX and
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in
the presence of sunlight. Emissions from
industrial facilities, electric utilities,
motor vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors,
and chemical solvents are some of the
major sources of NOX and VOC.
Breathing ozone can trigger a variety of
health problems, particularly for
children, the elderly, and people of all
ages who have lung diseases such as
asthma. Ground level ozone can also
have harmful effects on sensitive
vegetation and ecosystems.
CAA sections 108 and 109 require
EPA to set primary and secondary
NAAQS. Primary NAAQS are those that
the attainment and maintenance of
which, allowing an adequate margin of
safety, are requisite to protect the public
health. Secondary NAAQS specify a
level of air quality the attainment and
maintenance of which is requisite to
protect the public welfare from any
known or anticipated adverse effects
1 Also, on August 29, 2018 the District of
Columbia submitted a separate SIP revision to
address all the VOC RACT requirements under the
2008 ozone NAAQS both for VOC sources covered
by a CTG and for other major stationary sources of
VOC. This VOC RACT SIP revision is the subject
of a separate rulemaking action. See 84 FR 33032,
July 11, 2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47915
associated with the presence of such air
pollutant in the ambient air. Section
109(d) of the CAA requires EPA to
complete a thorough review of each
NAAQS and make revisions to existing
NAAQS and promulgate new NAAQS as
may be appropriate. Since 1977, EPA
has revised the NAAQS for ozone in
1979, 1997, 2008, and 2015. To date, the
primary and secondary ozone NAAQS
have been set at the same level. See 40
CFR 50.9, 50.10, 50.15, and 50.19 and
appendices thereto.
The CAA sets forth a comprehensive
regime for implementation of the ozone
NAAQS through Federal and state
regulation of VOC and NOX emissions.
The requirements for ozone SIPs are
found in sections 172 and 182 through
185 of the CAA.
Under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS,
promulgated in 1979, the District of
Columbia had been designated as
nonattainment for ozone prior to
November 15, 1990 and was designated
as part of the multi-state Washington
Area ozone nonattainment area. This
area was initially classified as serious
and was later reclassified as severe. See
56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991); 68 FR
5246 (January 24, 2004); and 40 CFR
81.309.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a
revised NAAQS for ground level ozone
based on 8-hour average concentrations.
62 FR 38856. The 8-hour averaging
period replaced the previous 1-hour
averaging period, and the level of the
NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts
per million (ppm) to 0.08 ppm (1997
ozone NAAQS). On April 30, 2004, EPA
designated the District of Columbia
under the 1997 ozone NAAQS as a part
of the Washington, DC–MD–VA
moderate nonattainment area. See 69 FR
23858 and 40 CFR 81.309.
On March 12, 2008, EPA promulgated
the 2008 ozone NAAQS to strengthen
the 8-hour ozone standards, by revising
its level to 0.075 ppm averaged over an
8-hour. On May 21, 2012, EPA
designated, under the 2008 ozone
NAAQS, the District of Columbia as a
part of the Washington, DC–MD–VA
marginal nonattainment area. 77 FR
30088 and 40 CFR 81.309.
Subsequently, EPA redesignated the
District of Columbia portion of this area
to attainment of the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. See 84 FR 33855 (July 16,
2019).
On March 6, 2015, EPA announced its
revocation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS
for all purposes and for all areas in the
country, effective on April 6, 2015. EPA
has determined that certain
nonattainment planning requirements
continue to be in effect under the
revoked standard for nonattainment
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
47916
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
areas under the 1997 ozone NAAQS,
including RACT. See 80 FR 12264.
B. RACT Requirements for Ozone
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX
and VOC to prevent photochemical
reactions that result in ozone formation
in areas designated nonattainment for
the ozone NAAQS. All nonattainment
areas under any NAAQS are subject to
the general nonattainment planning
requirements of CAA section 172.
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides
that SIPs for nonattainment areas must
include reasonably available control
measures (RACM) for demonstrating
attainment of all NAAQS, including
emissions reductions from existing
sources through the adoption of RACT.
Further, section 182(b)(2) of the CAA
sets forth additional RACT requirements
for ozone nonattainment areas classified
as moderate or higher.
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA sets
forth requirements regarding RACT for
the ozone NAAQS for VOC sources.
Section 182(f) requires major stationary
sources of NOX be subject to the same
RACT requirements applicable to major
stationary sources of VOC. A ‘‘major
stationary source’’ is defined based on
the source’s potential to emit (PTE) of
NOX or VOC, and the applicable
thresholds for RACT. These thresholds
differ based on the classification of the
nonattainment area in which the source
is located. See sections 182(c)–(f) and
302 of the CAA. Section 302(j) sets a
general threshold of 100 tons per year
(tpy) which may be lowered under
section 182 depending upon an area’s
nonattainment classification. For
example, in a severe ozone
nonattainment area, the major stationary
source threshold for NOX is lowered to
25 tpy from 100 tpy.
Section 184(a) of the CAA established
the current Ozone Transport Region
(OTR) comprised of 12 eastern states,
including the District of Columbia.
Section 184(b)(2) of the CAA applies the
RACT requirements in section
182(b)(2)(C) (relating to RACT on other
major stationary sources of VOC and
pursuant to CAA section 182(f) to major
stationary sources of NOX) for moderate
nonattainment areas to nonattainment
areas classified as marginal and to
attainment areas located within the
OTR. This requirement is referred to as
OTR RACT. As noted previously, a
‘‘major stationary source’’ is defined
based on the source’s PTE of NOX, VOC,
or both pollutants, and the applicable
thresholds differ based on the
classification of the nonattainment area
in which the source is located and in
some cases being located within the
OTR. See sections 182(c)–(f), 184(b) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
302(j) of the CAA. In the case of a
marginal or moderate nonattainment
area located in the OTR, the major
stationary source threshold for NOX
emissions is the same as the OTR
threshold of 100 tpy or more PTE.
Since the 1970’s, EPA has
consistently defined RACT as the lowest
emission limit that a particular source is
capable of meeting by the application of
the control technology that is reasonably
available considering technological and
economic feasibility. See 44 FR 53762
(September 17, 1979) and 57 FR 55620,
55624 (November 25, 1992). Although
EPA historically has recommended
source-category-wide presumptive
RACT limits and plans to continue that
practice, decisions on RACT may be
made on a case-by-case basis, that is, on
an emissions unit specific basis,
considering the technological and
economic circumstances of the
individual source. See 57 FR 55620,
55624 (November 25, 1992). A
presumptive RACT emissions limit is an
emissions standard that applies to a
category of emissions sources unless the
source seeks a case-by-case
determination of RACT.
EPA has provided more substantive
RACT requirements through
implementation rules for each ozone
NAAQS as well as through guidance. In
2004 and 2005, EPA promulgated an
implementation rule for the
implementation of the 1997 ozone
NAAQS in two phases (‘‘Phase 1 of the
1997 Ozone Implementation Rule’’ and
‘‘Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule’’). See 69 FR
23951 (April 30, 2004) and 70 FR 71612
(November 29, 2005), respectively. The
Phase 2 Ozone Implementation Rule
addressed RACT statutory requirements
under the 1997 ozone NAAQS. See 70
FR 71652.
On March 6, 2015, EPA issued its
final rule for implementing the 2008
ozone NAAQS (‘‘the 2008 Ozone SIP
Requirements Rule’’). 80 FR 12264. At
the same time, EPA revoked the 1997
ozone NAAQS, effective on April 6,
2015. The 2008 Ozone SIP
Requirements Rule provided
comprehensive requirements to
transition from the revoked 1997 ozone
NAAQS to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, as
codified in 40 CFR part 51, subpart AA,
following revocation.
Consistent with previous policy, EPA
determined that areas designated
nonattainment for both the 1997 and
2008 ozone NAAQS at the time of
revocation, must retain implementation
of certain nonattainment area
requirements (i.e., anti-backsliding
requirements) for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS as specified under section 182
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of the CAA, including RACT. See 40
CFR 51.1100(o). An area remains subject
to the anti-backsliding requirements for
a revoked NAAQS until EPA determines
that the five statutory requirements of
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) are met for a
revoked NAAQS.2 There are no effects
on applicable OTR requirements for
areas within the OTR, as a result of the
revocation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS.
Thus, the District of Columbia, as a state
within the OTR, remains subject to
RACT requirements for both the 1997
ozone NAAQS and the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.
In addressing RACT, the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule continued most
of the RACT provisions and policy for
RACT requirements under section 182
and 184 of the CAA issued in the Phase
2 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation
Rule. In the 2008 Ozone SIP
Requirements Rule, EPA required RACT
measures to be implemented by January
1, 2017 for areas classified as moderate
nonattainment or above and all areas of
the OTR. EPA also provided in the 2008
Ozone SIP Requirements Rule that
RACT SIPs must contain adopted RACT
regulations, certifications that existing
provisions continue to meet RACT, and/
or negative declarations stating that
there are no sources in the
nonattainment area covered by a
specific Control Technique Guideline
(CTG) source category. States must
submit appropriate supporting
information for their RACT
submissions, in accordance with Phase
2 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation
Rule. Adequate documentation must
support that states have considered
control technology that is economically
and technologically feasible in
determining RACT, based on
information that is current at the time of
development of the RACT SIP. EPA also
recognized that states may conclude in
some cases that sources already
addressed by RACT determinations for
the 1-hour and/or 1997 ozone NAAQS
may not need to implement additional
controls to meet the 2008 ozone NAAQS
RACT requirement. See 80 FR 12278–
12279 (March 6, 2015).
C. Applicability of RACT Requirements
in the District of Columbia
Since 1990, the District of Columbia
implemented numerous RACT controls
throughout the District of Columbia to
2 On February 16, 2018, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C.
Cir. Court) issued an opinion on the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule. South Coast Air Quality
Management District v. EPA, 882 F.3d 1138 (D.C.
Cir. 2018) (‘‘South Coast II’’). The D.C. Cir. Court
found certain parts unreasonable and vacated those
provisions accordingly.
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
meet the CAA RACT requirements
under the 1-hour and the 1997 ozone
standards. The District of Columbia was
first subject to NOX RACT requirements
as a serious (later reclassified to severe)
ozone nonattainment area under the 1hour ozone NAAQS and as a moderate
nonattainment area under the 1997
ozone NAAQS. The District of
Columbia’s first NOX RACT rules were
adopted and codified as Section 805
(Section 805) under Title 20 of the
District of Columbia Municipal
Regulations (20 DCMR), Chapter 8—
Asbestos, Sulfur and Nitrogen Oxides,
and adopted other supporting
provisions in 20 DCMR Chapter 1
(relating to definitions and
abbreviations) and in Chapter 5 (relating
to source monitoring and reporting).
Section 805 was originally effective in
1993 with amendments in 2000 and
2004. See 65 FR 81369 (December 26,
2000); 69 FR 77645 (December 28,
2004); and 69 FR 77647 (December 28,
2004). For the 1997 ozone NAAQS, the
District of Columbia revised and
promulgated its RACT regulations and
demonstrated that it complied with the
CAA RACT requirements in a SIP
revision (1997 RACT SIP) approved by
EPA on June 16, 2009 (74 FR 28447).
The District of Columbia has no
outstanding ozone RACT requirements
for the 1-hour and 1997 ozone NAAQS.
Under the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the
District of Columbia is classified as
marginal nonattainment and therefore
has no RACT requirements due to its
designation and classification as an
ozone nonattainment area. However,
because the District of Columbia is part
of the OTR established under section
184 of the CAA, the District of Columbia
has obligations under the OTR RACT
requirements of CAA sections 184(b)
and 182(f).
RACT applies to major stationary
sources of NOX and VOC under each
ozone NAAQS or any VOC sources
subject to CTG RACT. Because the
District of Columbia’s NOX RACT SIP
revision is the only subject of this notice
of proposed rulemaking, the VOC RACT
requirements in the District of Columbia
will not be discussed further.
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Summary of the District of
Columbia’s SIP Revision
A. Overview
On August 29, 2018 and
supplemented on December 19, 2018,
DOEE submitted a revision to the
District of Columbia’s SIP to address all
the requirements of NOX RACT set forth
by the CAA under the 2008 ozone
NAAQS (the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission). This SIP revision includes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
amendments to 20 DCMR, Chapter 8,
sections 805.1 (Section 805.1, relating to
applicability), and 805.4 (Section 805.4,
emissions limits for stationary
combustion turbines) and to 20 DCMR
Chapter 1, Section 199 (Section 199,
relating to definitions).
B. Main Components of the SIP Revision
The District of Columbia’s 2008 NOX
RACT Submission includes:
1. New regulations for certain
stationary combustion turbinecogeneration (or combined heat and
power (CHP) systems) emissions sources
that have come on line at four major
stationary sources of NOX in the District
of Columbia since the 1997 RACT SIP
was developed.3 The new regulations
also set NOX RACT emissions limits for
any additional combustion turbine in
the categories regulated beyond those
existing in the District of Columbia on
the date, December 14, 2018, the new
emissions limits in the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission were adopted. These
regulatory changes include changes in
the applicability provisions of Section
805 and include the addition of new
definitions needed by the addition of or
revisions to the NOX emission limits for
the recently installed categories of
combustion turbines. The former
Section 805.4 only set NOX emissions
limits for combustion turbines of over
100 million British Thermal Units per
hour (mmBTU per hour) heat input
burning fuel oil; the new regulations in
the 2008 NOX RACT Submission for
stationary combustion turbines set NOX
limits for turbines over 50 mmBTU per
hour burning fuel oil which are as
stringent or more stringent than the
prior limits. Specifically, these
amendments to 20 DCMR, Chapter 8,
include changes to applicability in
Section 805.1, emissions limits for
stationary combustion turbines in
Section 805.4, and definitions in
Section 199;
2. Source-specific RACT
determinations for three flares and one
auxiliary boiler that are located at the
Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater
Treatment Plant (BPAWTP) that are
unique to the District of Columbia. The
DOEE opted to set the NOX RACT limits
for those sources by adding to the
District of Columbia SIP those specific
NOX emission limitations, which the
3 Hereafter, ‘‘combustion turbine’’ will mean
‘‘stationary combustion turbine.’’ As used in
Section 805.4 and defined in 20 DCMR Chapter 1,
Section 199, a ‘‘stationary combustion turbine’’
means that the combustion turbine is not selfpropelled or intended to be propelled while
performing its function. It may, however, be
mounted on a vehicle for portability.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47917
DOEE has determined are NOX RACT,
in an operating permit;
3. For all other sources at major
stationary sources of NOX in the District
of Columbia, a certification that the NOX
emissions limits found in Section 805,
which were implemented and approved
into the District of Columbia’s SIP under
the 1-hour and the 1997 ozone NAAQS,
are still RACT with the exception of: (a)
The revised emissions limits for
stationary combustion turbines found in
Section 805.4; (b) the source-specific
RACT determinations at the BPAWTP;
and (c) the other new regulatory
provisions relating to definitions and
source monitoring; and
4. Amendments to the existing
Section 805.4 to remove carbon
monoxide (CO) emissions limits relating
to combustion turbines of over 100
mmBTU per hour heat input burning
fuel oil because there are no longer any
such emissions units in the District of
Columbia.
III. EPA’s Evaluation of the District of
Columbia’s SIP Revision
A. New Emissions Limits for
Combustion Turbines and Conforming
Amendments
The District of Columbia’s NOX RACT
SIP revision contains a final rule
amending 20 DCMR, Chapter 8, Section
805.4 to amend the District of
Columbia’s NOX emission limits for
combustion turbines and for any duct
burners or associated heat recovery
steam generators. Emissions limits are
set for combustion turbines depending
upon the peak heat input rating of the
combustion turbine and type of fuel
burned. The amendments also include
the addition of conforming definitions
and abbreviations to the applicability
provisions of Section 805.1 to clarify
that any associated heat recovery steam
generators and duct burners were
subject to Section 805. Further, the
amendments amend Section 199
‘‘Definitions And Abbreviations’’ to add
definitions for new terms found in
Section 805.4 and to remove CO
emissions limits for combustion
turbines of over 100 mmBTU per hour
heat input burning fuel oil (discussed
further in section III. D. of this
document).
1. Amendments to Section 805.1
Applicability of Section 805
Section 805.4, prior to the 2008 NOX
RACT Submission, established NOX
RACT standards for combustion
turbines with heat input capacities of
100 mmBTU per hour or more. Since
the final rulemaking of Section 805
published on April 16, 2004, all
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
47918
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
combustion turbines located in the
District of Columbia with heat input
capacities of 100 mmBTU per hour or
more have been decommissioned.
Volume 65, No. 30 of the District of
Columbia Register (DCR), page 007876,
July 27, 2018. However, several new
combustion turbines with heat input
capacities less than 100 mmBTU per
hour and in some cases associated heat
recovery steam generators and duct
burners have been installed at major
stationary sources of NOX since that
time. The amendments to Section 805.4
in the 2008 NOX RACT Submission set
NOX emission limits for such smaller
units, and the DOEE now seeks to
include the amendments into the
District of Columbia’s SIP.
Sections 805.1(a) and 805.1(a)(2)
regarding applicability of Section 805
were amended to specify that Section
805 also applies to any heat recovery
steam generators and duct burners
associated with combustion turbines
which are part of a turbine and to
combustion turbines of any size at a
major stationary source of NOX. EPA
believes this change is approvable as the
amended applicability provisions
clearly specify that all combustion
turbines and any associated heat
recovery steam generators and duct
burners at major stationary sources of
NOX are covered by the NOX emission
limits now set by Section 805.4.
2. New Emissions Limits for
Combustion Turbines and Associated
Heat Recovery Steam Generators and
Duct Burners
The DOEE amended Section 805.4 to
establish presumptive NOX RACT
emissions limits for combustion
turbines with heat input capacities less
than 100 mmBTU per hour. The DOEE
set NOX RACT limits for stationary
combustion turbines based on a review
of emission levels achieved in practice
at existing stationary combustion
turbines in the District of Columbia,
emission limits set by preconstruction
permits, the new source performance
standards (NSPS) in Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (40 CFR), Part 60,
subpart KKKK Standards of
Performance for Stationary Combustion
Turbines (NSPS subpart KKKK) and
upon recommendations in an Ozone
Transport Commission (OTC) model
rule.4 The DOEE revised 20 DMCR
Section 805.4 to establish these levels
achieved in practice, NSPS or permit
4 The OTC recommendations are found in a
‘‘model rule’’ available on-line at https://otcair.org/
upload/Documents/Model%20Rules/
OTC%20Model%20Rule%20%20HEDD%20Turbines%20Final.pdf (last accessed
and downloaded March 27, 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
limits as presumptive NOX RACT
emission limits for the District of
Columbia’s SIP. Most of the emissions
limits are set in parts per million by
volume dry basis (ppmvd) corrected to
15 percent excess oxygen (@15% O2) or
(ppmvd @15% O2).
Section 805.4 specifies that the
applicability of its NOX emissions limits
shall be determined therein solely upon
the peak heat input rating of the
combustion turbine without inclusion of
any additional heat input from
associated heat recovery steam
generators or duct burners when
determining the peak heat input to the
combustion turbine. Restricting
applicability based solely on the
combustion turbine’s heat input rating
is the same as the applicability
provisions of the NSPS subpart KKKK.
See 40 CFR 60.4305. The applicable
emissions limit depends on the date that
construction, modification, or
reconstruction commenced, and
whether duct burners of associated heat
recovery steam generators are used.
Under the revised Section 805.4
submitted in the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission the NOX emission limits for
combustion turbines are 25 ppmvd @
15% O2 when burning gaseous fuels
except for combustion turbines under 10
mmBTU per hour heat input capacity
burning only natural gas. For units with
heat input ratings of less than or equal
to 50 mmBTU per hour, the Section
805.4 limits are 25 ppmvd @15% O2
when burning gaseous fuels and of 42
ppmvd @15% O2 when burning liquid
fuels; these limits are more stringent
than the NSPS subpart KKKK standards
when burning natural gas and when
burning ‘‘fuels other than natural gas,’’
respectively. For units with heat input
ratings of greater than 50 mmBTU per
hour, the NOX emission limit is 74
ppmvd @15% O2 when burning liquid
fuels which is the same as that found in
NSPS subpart KKKK. When
construction, modification, or
reconstruction commenced on or after
February 18, 2005, this 74 ppmvd limit
also applies. For any combustion
turbine of greater than 50 mmBTU per
hour heat input capacity for which
construction, modification, or
reconstruction commenced before
February 18, 2005, the emission limit is
twenty hundredths (0.20) pounds per
million BTU heat input (calendar day
average) when burning any fuel or
combinations if the duct burners are in
use.
The NOX emission limits in Section
805.4 before adoption of the limits in
the 2008 NOX RACT submission were
75 ppmvd @15% O2 and applied to oilfired, combustion turbines with a heat
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
input over 100 mmBTU per hour. The
amended Section 805.4 sets a NOX
emission limit of 74 ppmvd @15% O2
for stationary combustion turbines of
greater than 50 mmBTU per hour heat
input capacity when burning liquid
fuels. Oil would constitute a liquid fuel
under the new definition (discussed in
the next section of this document) found
in Section 199. Therefore, the amended
Section 805.4 sets a limit which is
slightly more stringent for oil-fired
stationary combustion turbines of
greater than 100 mmBTU per hour heat
input capacity than what existed before
adoption of the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission. EPA finds that revising
Section 805.4 with the regulatory
changes of the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission strengthens the SIP with
respect to oil-fired stationary
combustion turbines of greater than 100
mmBTU per hour heat input capacity.
When burning a mixture of fuels, the
gaseous fuels limit applies if the
percentage of heat input from gaseous
fuels is greater than or equal to 50
percent; if the heat input from liquid
fuels is greater than 50 percent, the
liquid fuel limit applies. This provision
is analogous to the NSPS subpart KKKK
provisions for mixed fuel firing (40 CFR
60.4325) except when Section 805.4
specifies ‘‘gaseous fuels’’ and ‘‘liquid
fuels’’ the NSPS specifies ‘‘natural gas’’
and ‘‘fuels other than natural gas,’’
respectively.
The District of Columbia has one
facility with combustion turbines that
can burn ‘‘digestor gas’’ which is made
by treating sewage. Under the NSPS
subpart KKKK such a unit would have
to comply with the NSPS limits for
‘‘fuels other than natural gas’’ when
burning ‘‘digestor gas.’’ Under the
revised Section 805.4 a combustion
turbine burning ‘‘digestor gas’’ must
meet the same NOX limits for
combustion turbines burning natural gas
or any other gaseous fuel due to the
definition adopted for ‘‘gaseous fuel.’’
3. Definitions Added to Section 199
The amended regulations also add
definitions to Section 199 ‘‘Definitions
and Abbreviations’’ for ‘‘duct burner,’’
‘‘gaseous fuel,’’ ‘‘heat recovery steam
generating unit,’’ ‘‘liquid fuel,’’ ‘‘natural
gas’’ and ‘‘combustion turbine.’’ See
Section 199.1. EPA believes that these
definitions are necessary to define what
exact sources are subject to Section
805.4 and when specific limits apply by
fuel type.
With two exceptions, the definitions
added to Section 199.1 are the same as
those found in the NSPS subpart KKKK
(40 CFR 60.4420). The two exceptions
are the definitions for ‘‘gaseous fuel’’
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
and ‘‘liquid fuel.’’ The NSPS subpart
KKKK needs to define ‘‘natural gas’’
because the NSPS subpart KKKK
distinguishes NOX emissions limits for
stationary combustion turbines burning
only natural gas from units burning
‘‘fuels other than natural gas.’’ Section
199.1 defines ‘‘gaseous fuel’’ with the
criterion of a fuel that is in ‘‘a gaseous
state at standard atmospheric
temperature and pressure under
ordinary conditions.’’ This definition
includes fuels that under the NSPS
Subpart KKKK would be a fuel other
than natural gas and subject to higher
limits than those applicable to units
burning natural gas. Under the Section
199.1 amendment, ‘‘natural gas’’ is a
subset of ‘‘gaseous fuel.’’ Section 199.1
defines ‘‘liquid fuel’’ as ‘‘any fuel that
maintains a liquid state at standard
atmospheric temperature and pressure.’’
The net effect of these differences in
definitions is that Section 805.4 sets
more stringent limits than NSPS subpart
KKKK for some fuels other than natural
gas. The amended regulations in the
2008 NOX RACT Submission also add to
Section 199.2 the abbreviation ‘‘ppmvd’’
to mean ‘‘Parts Per Million by Volume
Dry Basis.’’
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Applicable Affected Source
Threshold
EPA only requires that when
implementing a revised ozone NAAQS,
a state must review and update NOX
RACT only for those stationary sources
of NOX that are ‘‘major threshold’’ with
an area’s classification under the revised
ozone NAAQS. Because the District of
Columbia has been designated as a
marginal nonattainment area in the OTR
the RACT obligation for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS applies only to major stationary
sources of 100 tpy PTE or more of NOX.
The District of Columbia’s emissions
limitations for stationary combustion
turbines in the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission apply to combustion
turbines at stationary sources with a
PTE of 25 tpy or more of NOX because
the District of Columbia retains the 25
tpy PTE applicability threshold found in
Section 805.1 required under the
District of Columbia’s severe
classification under the 1-hour NAAQS.
In the preamble to the proposed rule for
the amendments to Section 805, the
District of Columbia provided notice
that then proposed (now final)
combustion turbine emissions limits
would apply to any combustion turbines
located at a stationary source with the
PTE of 25 tpy or more of NOX. Volume
65, No. 30, of the District of Columbia
Register, Page 007877, July 27, 2018.
This makes the 2008 NOX RACT
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
Submission more stringent than that
required for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
5. Other Provisions
Section 805.4 sets a maintenance
standard for combustion turbines with a
heat input rating less than or equal to 10
mmBTU per hour and fired exclusively
on natural gas. Section 805.4 also has a
requirement that any combustion
turbine subject to Section 805 shall
always be maintained and operated in a
manner consistent with good air
pollution control practices for
minimizing emissions, including during
startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
Additionally, Section 805.4 prohibits
any combustion turbine fired on coal or
a synthetic fuel derived from coal and
requires any combustion turbine
designed to be fired on any solid fuel
other than coal or a synthetic fuel
derived from any other solid than coal
to have a case-by-case RACT determined
pursuant to Section 805.7 (already in
the SIP) for approval by EPA as a
revision to the District of Columbia’s
SIP.
6. EPA Analysis
The DOEE NOX RACT regulation is
based on current technologies for
combustion turbines, without the
addition of add-on controls such as
selective catalytic reduction (SCR).
DOEE’s review was based on a review
of emission levels achieved in practice
by the existing sources within the
District of Columbia and by sources
subject to the NSPS subpart KKKK or by
sources subject to a lowest achievable
emission rate (LAER) determination
limits set by a preconstruction permit.5
The District of Columbia’s limits were
set based upon the comparability to
those established for new units
according to the NSPS Subpart KKKK or
permits for units with heat input ratings
exceeding 50 mmBTU per hour. For
units with heat input ratings less than
or equal to 50 mmBTU per hour, the
DOEE set limits more stringent than the
NSPS Subpart KKKK standards based
upon 2010 recommendations made by
the OTC.
The DOEE evaluated technically
feasible add-on controls, such as SCR, as
5 CAA section 171 defines LAER as the most
stringent rate of emissions based on the following:
(1) The most stringent emissions limitation which
is contained in the implementation plan of any
State for such class or category of stationary source,
unless the owner or operator of the proposed
stationary source demonstrates that such limitations
are not achievable; or (2) The most stringent
emissions limitation which is achieved in practice
by such class or category of stationary sources. In
no event shall the application of the term permit a
proposed new or modified stationary source to emit
any pollutant in excess of the amount allowable
under an applicable NSPS.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47919
RACT for this source category but
determined that heavy investment in
additional end-of-pipe controls to this
level is not economically feasible or cost
effective with respect to the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. The Department estimated a
cost per ton of NOX reductions of
$13,794 for small turbines (in the 5megawatt range) currently found in the
District of Columbia.
EPA finds that the RACT
determination provided by the District
of Columbia is reasonable and
appropriately considered technically
and economically feasible controls
while setting lowest achievable limits to
adequately meet RACT under the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS for these
categories of combustion turbines. EPA
finds that the District of Columbia has
set presumptive RACT emissions limits
for stationary combustion turbines for
existing major stationary sources of NOX
in the District of Columbia. EPA finds
that revising Section 805.4 with the
regulatory changes of the 2008 NOX
RACT Submission strengthens the SIP
with respect to oil-fired stationary
combustion turbines of greater than 100
mm BTU per hour heat input capacity
and can be approved.
B. District of Columbia Water Blue
Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Plant Source Specific NOX RACT
The DOEE issued a permit to District
of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority
(DC Water) to construct and operate new
biosolids handling facilities located at
the BPAWTP. The equipment to be
installed and operated included: (1) A
main process train that includes four
thermal hydrolysis process trains (for
thermally hydrolyzed sludge digestion)
and two emergency flares rated at 126
mmBTU per hour heat input for each
firing digestor gas, and (2) a CHP system
that includes three stationary
combustion turbines each with a duct
burner, one auxiliary boiler of 62.52
mmBTU per hour heat input, and one
‘‘siloxane destruction flare’’ rated at
6.14 mmBTU per hour. The two
emergency flares of the main process
train and the auxiliary boiler and the
siloxane destruction flare in the CHP
system emit NOX and are subject to the
NOX RACT source specific
determination requirements
For the CHP system and the two
emergency flares of the main process
train, DOEE issued the BPAWTP a
permit to operate on April 20, 2018
(April 20, 2018 operating permit)
pursuant to 20 DCMR Section 200.2.
The equipment covered by the April 20,
2018 operating permit covered the
combustion turbines and associated
duct burners plus the auxiliary boiler
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
47920
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
and flares that burn digester gas.6 The
NOX emission limits for the permitted
equipment were established through a
non-attainment new source review
process in 2011/2012 and the installed
emission controls were determined to be
LAER at that time. Prior to issuing the
final April 20, 2018 operating permit,
the DOEE conducted a review of the
emissions limits and determined that
these combustion turbines, heat
recovery steam generators with duct
burners (covered under the amended
Section 805.4), and an auxiliary boiler
are still among the best performing units
in EPA’s RACT/BACT/LAER
Clearinghouse for broadly similar
applications and are therefore at least as
stringent as RACT.7
Part of the review of the April 20,
2018 operating permit included a
reevaluation of the NOX limits for the
digester gas-fired auxiliary boiler and
the three flares at the facility based
upon actual performance. The DOEE
concluded that, due to higher
concentrations of ammonia in the
digester gas compared to that resulting
from other sewage digester systems, the
three flares and the boiler would each
inherently emit more NOX than the
typical flares and auxiliary boilers fired
with digestor gas. The DOEE concluded
that this is due to the difference in
digestion processes. The BPAWTP uses
a different digestion technology—
thermally hydrolyzed sludge
digestion—which is the first of its kind
in the United States. As such, even
though the BPAWTP uses a flare used
in other digester gas applications, the
NOX levels exiting the flare are higher
due to the increased fuel-bound
nitrogen. Based upon this 2018 review
of the performance of the auxiliary
boiler and the three flares, the DOEE
concluded that the NOX emission limits
and associated control technologies in
the April 20, 2018 permit for the
digester gas-fired auxiliary boiler and
the three flares at the facility meet or
exceed RACT requirements because
these limits were based upon the
DOEE’s LAER, which by definition
cannot be less stringent than RACT and
often results in more stringent control
than RACT.
With the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission, the DOEE submitted a
redacted version of the April 20, 2018
operating permit, which includes only
those provisions related to the NOX
RACT determination. A copy of the
redacted April 20, 2018 operating
permit is in the docket for this proposed
action. The emissions limits, testing or
reporting requirements for other
pollutants such as particulate matter,
sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide have
been redacted so as not to be submitted
for inclusion in the SIP. The following
Table 1 provides a summary of the NOX
emission limits.
TABLE 1—NOX LIMITS FOR BPAWTP AUXILIARY BOILER AND FLARES
Heat Input capacity—mmBTU per hour ...........
NOX limit (pounds NOX/mmBTU) .....................
Mass limit NOX pounds per hour .....................
Auxiliary boiler (AB)
Siloxane destruction
flare (SF)
Emergency flares
(each)
62.52 on DG ...................................................
61.79 on NG ...................................................
0.034 on DG ...................................................
0.032 on NG ...................................................
2.11 on any percentage of DG .......................
6.14 on DG .................
126 on DG.
0.06 on DG .................
0.101 on DG.
0.37 ............................
12.72.
‘‘DG’’ means digestor gas; ‘‘NG’’ means natural gas.
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
EPA finds that the RACT
determination provided by the District
of Columbia is reasonable and
appropriately considered technically
and economically feasible controls
while setting lowest achievable limits to
adequately meet RACT on a source
specific basis under the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for these emissions units.
EPA finds that source specific limits are
appropriate because the source category,
related to municipal wastewater
treatment, is unique within the District
of Columbia. These limits were set on
technology consistent with LAER which
essentially reflects the lowest rate in any
SIP or achieved in practice and are
based upon the actual performance of
the emissions units.
C. Certification of Other Provisions in
Section 805
Prior to the amendments submitted
with the 2008 NOX RACT Submission,
6 NO RACT for the three 46.3 mmBTU per hour
X
combustion turbines and heat recovery steam
generators each equipped with a 21 mmBTU per
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
Section 805 contained the District of
Columbia’s NOX RACT controls as
amended in 2004 for implementation
and approval into the District of
Columbia SIP under the 1-hour and the
1997 ozone NAAQS. The District of
Columbia’s 2008 NOX RACT
Submission includes a certification that
the controls of the 2004 version of
Section 805 are still RACT except for
those sources for which the District of
Columbia submitted new NOX RACT
emissions limits in the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission. These sources are: (1) The
new limits for combustion turbines at
several major NOX sources (see section
III. A. in this document); and (2) the
digester gas equipment at one major
NOX source (see section III. B. in this
document regarding the BPAWTP).
Section 805 was originally adopted in
1993 and amended in 2000 and 2004.
The District of Columbia’s NOX RACT
emissions limits are specified by source
groups. Table 2 lists the rulemaking
history of District of Columbia’s
previously adopted NOX RACT controls,
and Table 2 lists the source groups
covered by Section 805. In the 2008
RACT Submission, the District of
Columbia is certifying that with certain
exceptions (the amendments to Section
805.4 and the unit specific limits at the
BPAWTP), Section 805 continues to
represent the lowest emission limits
based on currently available and
economically feasible control
technology for the source categories
and, therefore, meets the RACT
requirements for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS for major NOX stationary
sources as required by CAA sections
184(b)(2) and 182(f).
hour heat input duct burner is set under the revised
Section 805.4.
7 BACT stands for best available control
technology and is a requirement for certain
preconstruction permits under CAA Title I, Part C
(prevention of significant deterioration).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
47921
TABLE 2—DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA’S NOX RACT CONTROLS—RULEMAKING HISTORY OF SIP APPROVED PROVISIONS
Regulation 20 DCMR
Submittal
State effective date
Federal
Register date
805 ..............................
Original 1-hour ozone submittal ...................
Dec. 26, 2000 ...............
65 FR 81369.
805 ..............................
805 and 199.1 ............
Minor clarifications ........................................
Set applicability threshold to 25 tpy NOX—
severe nonattainment area under 1-hour
NAAQS.
Certify as RACT under 1997 ozone NAAQS
Nov. 19, 1993 and
Dec. 8, 2000.
April 16, 2004 ...........
April 16, 2004 ...........
Dec. 28, 2004 ...............
Dec. 28, 2004 ...............
69 FR 77645.
69 FR 77647.
September 22, 2008
June 16, 2009 ..............
74 FR 28447.
805 ..............................
Federal
Register notice
TABLE 3—DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA’S NOX RACT CONTROLS—RULEMAKING HISTORY OF SIP APPROVED PROVISIONS BY
SOURCE CATEGORY
Federal Register
notice #
Regulation 20 DCMR
Title of regulation
State effective date #
Federal effective date #
805.1 .........................
Fuel-burning equipment with an input capacity of 100 mmBTU per hour or greater.
Fuel-burning equipment with an input capacity equal to or greater than 20
mmBTU per hour, but less than 50
mmBTU per hour.
Fuel-burning equipment with an input capacity equal to or greater than 50 but
less than mmBTU per hour.
Combustion turbines ...................................
April 16, 2004 ...........
Dec. 28, 2004 .....................
69 FR 77645.
April 16, 2004 ...........
Dec. 28, 2004 .....................
69 FR 77645.
April 16, 2004 ...........
Dec. 28, 2004 .....................
69 FR 77645.
Nov. 27, 2018 ..........
See Sections D.1. above
and D.4. below ##.
April 16, 2004 ...........
Dec. 28, 2004 .....................
See Sections D.1.
above and D.4.
below ##.
69 FR 77645.
April 16, 2004 ...........
Dec. 28, 2004 .....................
69 FR 77645.
April 16, 2004 ...........
Dec. 28, 2004 .....................
69 FR 77645.
805.5 & 805.8 ...........
805.1 & 805.8 ...........
805.4 .........................
805.1 .........................
805.1 .........................
805.1 .........................
Asphalt concrete plant with a PTE 25 tpy
or greater.
All other fuel burning equipment with a
PTE of 25 tpy of NOX or greater.
Stationary internal combustion engines .....
# Most
recent revision or amendment.
revisions to Section 805.4 discussed in sections D.1. above and D.4. below completely revise Section 805.4. EPA action of these revisions is the subject of this action.
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
## The
Section 805 (as amended) provides
presumptive NOX limits for major
stationary sources of NOX but also
provides for a case-by-case RACT
determination process. The DOEE
evaluated their stationary source
inventory and current controls against
RACT emission limits of other States.
The DOEE compared the SIPs of other
similarly-situated States in the Eastern
United States (Virginia, Maryland,
North Carolina, Delaware, New Jersey,
New York, Connecticut, and
Massachusetts) to the District of
Columbia’s current emissions limits and
found that DOEE’s Section 805 limits
were in the same range. Based upon
such considerations, the DOEE
concluded that, when combined with
the amendments to Section 805 and the
source specific NOX RACT
determination for the BPAWTP, that no
further controls were needed to meet
RACT.
In combination with the amendments
to Sections 199 and 805 regarding
certain combustion turbines and related
equipment (evaluated in sections III.A
of this document) and with the source-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
specific NOX RACT determinations for
the flares and auxiliary boiler at
BPAWTP (evaluated in sections III.B of
this document), EPA proposes to find
that the previously adopted RACT
controls continue to represent NOX
RACT for the 2008 ozone NAAQS
required under sections 184(b)(2) and
182(f).
D. Removal of Prior Emissions Limits for
Combustion Turbines Over 100 mmBTU
per Hour
The District of Columbia’s
amendment to Section 805.4 removes
emission limits of 75 ppmvd NOX,
corrected to 15% excess oxygen for oilfired, combustion turbines with a heat
input over 100 mmBTU per hour from
the SIP in the former Section 805.4(a);
the former Section 805.4 also restricted
CO emissions not to exceed 50 ppmvd
@15% O2 at any operating condition, for
a one (1) hour average.
Regarding NOX emissions, the revised
Section 805.4 sets a lower emissions
limit for stationary combustion turbines
of this size. The revised Section 805.4(a)
sets a lower NOX limit of 74 @15% O2
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for any combustion turbine with heat
input rating greater than 50 mmBTU per
hour burning any combination of liquid
fuels.
The revised rule also removes the
exemption for low utilization turbines—
those operated for less than 500 hours
per year. Thus, the NOX limits set in
Section 805.4 apply. If any combustion
turbines over 100 mmBTU per hour are
installed in the District of Columbia in
the future such that the PTE increase is
over 25 tpy NOX, the District of
Columbia SIP major source permitting
program requires an emissions rate of
LAER and offsetting NOX emissions at a
ratio of 1.3:1. See 20 DCMR Chapter 2,
Section 204 (Permit Requirements for
Sources Affecting Non-attainment
Areas), which is approved into the SIP
at 40 CFR 52.470(c).
For CO emissions, there are no longer
any units over 100 mmBTU per hour
heat input in the District of Columbia.
Therefore, this change will not result in
relaxing an existing emissions limitation
applicable to any existing emissions
unit at a major stationary source.
Furthermore, the CO levels in the
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
47922
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC–
VA–MD area are well below the CO
NAAQS of 40 CFR 50.8. The maximum
value recorded at any ambient air
quality monitor in the WashingtonArlington-Alexandria, DC–VA–MD core
based statistical area is only 27 percent
(2.6 ppm CO) of the 9.5 ppm (8-hour
average) NAAQS and less than 8 percent
of the 35 ppm (1-hour average) NAAQS.
For CO, any new stationary
combustion turbine or turbines added in
the future that are by themselves a major
stationary source of CO or would
constitute a significant net emissions
increase at an existing major stationary
source of CO (or nitrogen dioxide)
would be required to obtain a
prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) permit under 40 CFR 52.499 and
52.21. The PSD permit would require
best available control technology.
EPA finds that removal of the CO
limits will not hinder or impede
attainment or maintenance of the CO
NAAQS in the District of Columbia. As
far as the ozone or nitrogen dioxide
NAAQS, EPA concludes that the
replacement of the former 75 ppmvd
NOX limits with the 74 ppmvd limits
applicable to liquid fuel fired stationary
combustion turbines will be as
protective of these NAAQS.
E. Summary
EPA finds that the District of
Columbia’s 2008 NOX RACT
Submission is reasonable and
demonstrates that the District has
adopted air pollution control strategies
that represent RACT for the purposes of
compliance with the 2008 8-hour ozone
standard for all major stationary sources
of NOX in the District in accordance
with the Phase 2 Ozone Implementation
Rule, the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements
Rule, and the latest available
information. EPA finds that the District
of Columbia’s SIP implements RACT
with respect to all existing major
stationary sources of NOX.
EPA also finds that the proposed
revisions to previously SIP approved
RACT requirements will result in
equivalent or additional reductions in
NOX emissions and should not interfere
with any applicable requirement or
reasonable further progress with the
NAAQS or interfere with other
applicable CAA requirements in section
110(l) of the CAA.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
District of Columbia’s 2008 RACT
Submission on the basis that the District
of Columbia has met the NOX RACT
requirements under the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS per CAA sections 182(f)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
and 184(b)(2) for the reasons explained
in this notice. EPA is proposing to
approve source specific NOX RACT
determinations for the BPAWTP and the
amendments to sections 199.1, 199.2,
805.1 and 805.4 of 20 DCMR discussed
in sections III. A. III. D. and V. A. of this
document.
The District of Columbia’s SIP
revision is based on: (1) Certification
that for certain categories of sources,
previously adopted RACT controls in
the District of Columbia’s SIP that were
approved by EPA under the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS and 1997 ozone NAAQS
continue to be technically and
economically feasible controls, and
continue to represent RACT for the 2008
ozone NAAQS implementation
purposes; (2) the adoption of new or
more stringent regulations or controls
into the District of Columbia’s SIP that
represent presumptive RACT control
levels for certain categories of sources;
and (3) source specific emissions limits
set for flares and an auxiliary boiler
serving the BPAWTP. EPA is proposing
to remove, in accordance with section
110 of the CAA, provisions setting
carbon monoxide emission limits for a
category of stationary combustion
turbines. EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in
this document. These comments will be
considered before taking final action.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing for certain categories of NOX
emissions at major stationary sources of
NOX emissions to incorporate by
reference both regulations adopted by
the District of Columbia and a sourcespecific RACT determinations under the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS found
within a preconstruction permit. The
amendments to and revision of 20
DCMR Chapters 1 and 8 are specified in
Section V. A. of this document; the
source specific information is provided
in Section V. B of this document.
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region III Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
A. Amendments to 20 District of
Columbia Municipal Regulations (20
DCMR)
1. Specifically, EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference into 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52.470(c): Amendments to 20 District of
Columbia Municipal Regulations,
Chapter 1, sections 199.1 and 199.2.
These amendments include adding
definitions in Section 199.1 for ‘‘Duct
burner,’’ ‘‘Gaseous fuel,’’ Heat recovery
steam generator,’’ ‘‘Liquid fuel,’’
‘‘Natural gas,’’ and ‘‘Stationary
combustion turbine,’’ and include an
amendment to Section 199.2 to define
the abbreviation ‘‘ppmvd.’’
2. Amendments to 20 District of
Columbia Municipal Regulations,
Chapter 8, sections 805.1 and 805.4
adopted by the District of Columbia on
November 14, 2018 and effective
December 14, 2018 as published in
Volume 65, Number 51 of the District of
Columbia Register on December 14,
2018. These amendments would
include:
(1) Revising sections 805.1(a) and
Section 805.1(a)(1);
(2) Revising Section 805.1(a)(1) to
remove NOX emissions limits for
stationary combustion turbines which
have an energy input capacity of one
hundred million (100,000,000) BTU and
adding NOX emissions limitations for
any stationary combustion turbine
which commenced construction,
modification, or reconstruction after
February 18, 2005 and has a heat input
rating greater than fifty million
(50,000,000) BTU per hour;
3. Revising Section 805.1(a)(2) to
remove CO emissions limits for
stationary combustion turbines which
have an energy input capacity of one
hundred million (100,000,000) BTU per
hour and adding NOX emissions
limitations for any stationary
combustion turbine which commenced
construction, modification, or
reconstruction on or before February 18,
2005 and has a heat input rating greater
than fifty million (50,000,000) BTU per
hour;
4. Adding a new Section 805.1(a)(3) to
set NOX emission limitations for any
stationary combustion turbines with a
heat input rating less than or equal to
fifty million (50,000,000) BTU per hour;
5. Adding a new Section 805.1(a)(4) to
set NOX emission limitations for certain
stationary combustion turbines with a
heat input rating less than or equal to
ten million (10,000,000) BTU per hour;
6. Adding new sections 805.1(a)(5)–
(7) to add new restrictions on stationary
combustion turbines;
7. Amending Section 805.4(b) to
replace requirements for stationary
combustion turbines with an energy
input capacity of one hundred million
(100,000,000) BTU per hour or greater
which is operated for less than five
hundred (500) hours per year with
testing and continuous monitoring
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
requirements for any person required to
comply with Section 805.4.
These regulatory changes to Section
805.4 and Section 199 were adopted on
November 27, 2018 and effective on the
date of publication, December 14, 2018,
in the District of Columbia Register (Vol.
65, Number 51, page 013499, December
14, 2018).
compliance through the test may result
in enforcement action.’’; III.d.4.A.
except ‘‘including records of visual
inspections,’’; III.d.4.B. (ii) except ‘‘and
CO’’; III.d.4.B. (iv); and, III.d.5.A. as
redacted to exclude ‘‘in addition to
complying with Condition II(f)’’.
4. This permit was issued April 20,
2018.
B. Source Specific Provisions for the
BPAWTP
Specifically, EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference into 40 CFR
52.470(d) certain portions of Permit (No.
6372–C2/O) to Construct and Operate
New Biosolids Handling Facilities
issued to District of Columbia Water and
Sewer Authority as redacted by the
District of Columbia:
1. The first paragraph citing the
pertinent permitting regulations and
listing (redacted) the following
significant components: One (1)
Auxiliary Boiler (AB) rated at 62.52
mmBTU per hour (HHV) heat input,
firing DG, One (1) Siloxane Destruction
Flare (SF) rated at 6.14 MMBTU per
hour heal input, firing DG; and Two (2)
Emergency Flares rated at 126 mmBTU
per hour heat input each, firing DG.
2. The NOX emissions limits listed in
the table found in permit condition ‘‘j.’’
for the Auxiliary Boiler (AB), Siloxane
Destruction Flare (SF) and Two (2)
Emergency Flares. The hourly NOX
emission limits for the Auxiliary Boiler
(AB), Siloxane Destruction Flare (SF)
and Two (2) Emergency Flares listed in
Table 2 (as redacted) found under
Condition III.
3. Conditions III.b.1.A.; III.b.3. A. and
B.; III.b.3. C.i., iii and iv.; III.b.3.D.;
III.b.3.E. except that relating to carbon
monoxide/CO; III.b.3.F. except ‘‘and
CO’’; III.b.3.G, iv. and v. except the
provision ‘‘Failure to demonstrate
compliance through the testing may
result in enforcement action.’’; III.b.4.A.;
III.b.4.B. iv. and v.; III.b.5. as redacted
to strike ‘‘in addition to complying with
Condition II(f)’’; III.d., III.d.1.A;
III.d.2.D; III.d.3.A. only the portion
‘‘Within 60 days of initial startup and
once every five years thereafter, the
Permittee shall conduct a Departmentapproved compliance source test at
multiple loads of EF–l, EF–2, and SF in
accordance with 40 CFR 60.8 or a
similar protocol acceptable to the
Department, to demonstrate compliance
with the emissions limitations
contained in Condition III(d)(1) of this
permit;’’ III.d.3.B as redacted to exclude
‘‘though additional testing may be
required at other times pursuant to
Condition II(d)(2)’’; III.d.3.C. (i), (iii) and
(iv); III.d.3.D.; III.d.3.H.(iv); III.d.3.H.(v)
except ‘‘Failure to demonstrate
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47923
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
regarding the NOX RACT SIP for the
District of Columbia under the 2008
ozone NAAQS, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 29, 2019.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2019–19669 Filed 9–10–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0495; FRL–9999–27]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances (19–5.B)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 6
chemical substances which are the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). This action would require
persons to notify EPA at least 90 days
before commencing manufacture
(defined by statute to include import) or
processing of any of these 6 chemical
substances for an activity that is
designated as a significant new use by
this proposed rule. This action would
further require that persons not
commence manufacture or processing
for the significant new use until they
have submitted a Significant New Use
Notice, and EPA has conducted a review
of the notice, made an appropriate
determination on the notice under
TSCA 5(a)(3), and has taken any risk
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47914-47923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19669]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0207; FRL-9999-64-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
District of Columbia; Reasonably Available Control Technology State
Implementation Plan for Nitrogen Oxides Under the 2008 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
District of Columbia. This revision pertains to reasonably available
control technology (RACT) requirements for nitrogen oxides
(NOX) under the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (2008 ozone NAAQS). The District of Columbia's
submittal for the NOX RACT
[[Page 47915]]
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS: Amends existing regulatory provisions to add
new or more stringent regulations or controls that represent RACT
control levels for combustion turbines and associated heat recovery
steam generators and duct burners, amends the applicability provisions
of these regulations to include all combustion turbines and associated
heat recovery steam generators and duct burners, and adds definitions;
includes a source specific NOX RACT determination for four
specific emissions units at one major stationary source of
NOX; includes a certification that, for other categories of
sources, NOX RACT controls already approved by EPA into the
District of Columbia's SIP for previous ozone NAAQS are based on
currently available technically and economically feasible controls and
continue to represent NOX RACT for 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
implementation purposes; and (4) removes carbon monoxide emissions
limits for combustion turbines that no longer exist in the District of
Columbia. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 11, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2019-0207 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Cripps, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is (215) 814-
2179. Mr. Cripps can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 29, 2018, and as supplemented on
December 19, 2018, the District of Columbia's Department of Energy and
Environmental (DOEE) submitted a revision to its SIP that addresses the
requirements of NOX RACT under the 2008 ozone NAAQS
(``Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Oxides of
Nitrogen (NOX) Determination for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)--Final'') dated August
29, 2018 with amendments to its NOX control regulations and
an operating permit setting RACT for certain specific emissions units
at one major stationary source of NOX (hereafter 2008
NOX RACT Submission).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Also, on August 29, 2018 the District of Columbia submitted
a separate SIP revision to address all the VOC RACT requirements
under the 2008 ozone NAAQS both for VOC sources covered by a CTG and
for other major stationary sources of VOC. This VOC RACT SIP
revision is the subject of a separate rulemaking action. See 84 FR
33032, July 11, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
A. 1-Hour, 1997, and 2008 Ozone NAAQS
Ground level ozone is not emitted directly into the air but is
created by chemical reaction between NOX and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sunlight. Emissions from
industrial facilities, electric utilities, motor vehicle exhaust,
gasoline vapors, and chemical solvents are some of the major sources of
NOX and VOC. Breathing ozone can trigger a variety of health
problems, particularly for children, the elderly, and people of all
ages who have lung diseases such as asthma. Ground level ozone can also
have harmful effects on sensitive vegetation and ecosystems.
CAA sections 108 and 109 require EPA to set primary and secondary
NAAQS. Primary NAAQS are those that the attainment and maintenance of
which, allowing an adequate margin of safety, are requisite to protect
the public health. Secondary NAAQS specify a level of air quality the
attainment and maintenance of which is requisite to protect the public
welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects associated with
the presence of such air pollutant in the ambient air. Section 109(d)
of the CAA requires EPA to complete a thorough review of each NAAQS and
make revisions to existing NAAQS and promulgate new NAAQS as may be
appropriate. Since 1977, EPA has revised the NAAQS for ozone in 1979,
1997, 2008, and 2015. To date, the primary and secondary ozone NAAQS
have been set at the same level. See 40 CFR 50.9, 50.10, 50.15, and
50.19 and appendices thereto.
The CAA sets forth a comprehensive regime for implementation of the
ozone NAAQS through Federal and state regulation of VOC and
NOX emissions. The requirements for ozone SIPs are found in
sections 172 and 182 through 185 of the CAA.
Under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, promulgated in 1979, the District of
Columbia had been designated as nonattainment for ozone prior to
November 15, 1990 and was designated as part of the multi-state
Washington Area ozone nonattainment area. This area was initially
classified as serious and was later reclassified as severe. See 56 FR
56694 (November 6, 1991); 68 FR 5246 (January 24, 2004); and 40 CFR
81.309.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a revised NAAQS for ground level
ozone based on 8-hour average concentrations. 62 FR 38856. The 8-hour
averaging period replaced the previous 1-hour averaging period, and the
level of the NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts per million (ppm) to
0.08 ppm (1997 ozone NAAQS). On April 30, 2004, EPA designated the
District of Columbia under the 1997 ozone NAAQS as a part of the
Washington, DC-MD-VA moderate nonattainment area. See 69 FR 23858 and
40 CFR 81.309.
On March 12, 2008, EPA promulgated the 2008 ozone NAAQS to
strengthen the 8-hour ozone standards, by revising its level to 0.075
ppm averaged over an 8-hour. On May 21, 2012, EPA designated, under the
2008 ozone NAAQS, the District of Columbia as a part of the Washington,
DC-MD-VA marginal nonattainment area. 77 FR 30088 and 40 CFR 81.309.
Subsequently, EPA redesignated the District of Columbia portion of this
area to attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 84 FR 33855 (July 16,
2019).
On March 6, 2015, EPA announced its revocation of the 1997 ozone
NAAQS for all purposes and for all areas in the country, effective on
April 6, 2015. EPA has determined that certain nonattainment planning
requirements continue to be in effect under the revoked standard for
nonattainment
[[Page 47916]]
areas under the 1997 ozone NAAQS, including RACT. See 80 FR 12264.
B. RACT Requirements for Ozone
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX and VOC to prevent
photochemical reactions that result in ozone formation in areas
designated nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS. All nonattainment areas
under any NAAQS are subject to the general nonattainment planning
requirements of CAA section 172. Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides
that SIPs for nonattainment areas must include reasonably available
control measures (RACM) for demonstrating attainment of all NAAQS,
including emissions reductions from existing sources through the
adoption of RACT. Further, section 182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth
additional RACT requirements for ozone nonattainment areas classified
as moderate or higher.
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth requirements regarding RACT
for the ozone NAAQS for VOC sources. Section 182(f) requires major
stationary sources of NOX be subject to the same RACT
requirements applicable to major stationary sources of VOC. A ``major
stationary source'' is defined based on the source's potential to emit
(PTE) of NOX or VOC, and the applicable thresholds for RACT.
These thresholds differ based on the classification of the
nonattainment area in which the source is located. See sections 182(c)-
(f) and 302 of the CAA. Section 302(j) sets a general threshold of 100
tons per year (tpy) which may be lowered under section 182 depending
upon an area's nonattainment classification. For example, in a severe
ozone nonattainment area, the major stationary source threshold for
NOX is lowered to 25 tpy from 100 tpy.
Section 184(a) of the CAA established the current Ozone Transport
Region (OTR) comprised of 12 eastern states, including the District of
Columbia. Section 184(b)(2) of the CAA applies the RACT requirements in
section 182(b)(2)(C) (relating to RACT on other major stationary
sources of VOC and pursuant to CAA section 182(f) to major stationary
sources of NOX) for moderate nonattainment areas to
nonattainment areas classified as marginal and to attainment areas
located within the OTR. This requirement is referred to as OTR RACT. As
noted previously, a ``major stationary source'' is defined based on the
source's PTE of NOX, VOC, or both pollutants, and the
applicable thresholds differ based on the classification of the
nonattainment area in which the source is located and in some cases
being located within the OTR. See sections 182(c)-(f), 184(b) and
302(j) of the CAA. In the case of a marginal or moderate nonattainment
area located in the OTR, the major stationary source threshold for
NOX emissions is the same as the OTR threshold of 100 tpy or
more PTE.
Since the 1970's, EPA has consistently defined RACT as the lowest
emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting by the
application of the control technology that is reasonably available
considering technological and economic feasibility. See 44 FR 53762
(September 17, 1979) and 57 FR 55620, 55624 (November 25, 1992).
Although EPA historically has recommended source-category-wide
presumptive RACT limits and plans to continue that practice, decisions
on RACT may be made on a case-by-case basis, that is, on an emissions
unit specific basis, considering the technological and economic
circumstances of the individual source. See 57 FR 55620, 55624
(November 25, 1992). A presumptive RACT emissions limit is an emissions
standard that applies to a category of emissions sources unless the
source seeks a case-by-case determination of RACT.
EPA has provided more substantive RACT requirements through
implementation rules for each ozone NAAQS as well as through guidance.
In 2004 and 2005, EPA promulgated an implementation rule for the
implementation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS in two phases (``Phase 1 of the
1997 Ozone Implementation Rule'' and ``Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule''). See 69 FR 23951 (April 30, 2004) and 70 FR
71612 (November 29, 2005), respectively. The Phase 2 Ozone
Implementation Rule addressed RACT statutory requirements under the
1997 ozone NAAQS. See 70 FR 71652.
On March 6, 2015, EPA issued its final rule for implementing the
2008 ozone NAAQS (``the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule''). 80 FR
12264. At the same time, EPA revoked the 1997 ozone NAAQS, effective on
April 6, 2015. The 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule provided
comprehensive requirements to transition from the revoked 1997 ozone
NAAQS to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, as codified in 40 CFR part 51, subpart
AA, following revocation.
Consistent with previous policy, EPA determined that areas
designated nonattainment for both the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS at the
time of revocation, must retain implementation of certain nonattainment
area requirements (i.e., anti-backsliding requirements) for the 1997
ozone NAAQS as specified under section 182 of the CAA, including RACT.
See 40 CFR 51.1100(o). An area remains subject to the anti-backsliding
requirements for a revoked NAAQS until EPA determines that the five
statutory requirements of CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) are met for a
revoked NAAQS.\2\ There are no effects on applicable OTR requirements
for areas within the OTR, as a result of the revocation of the 1997
ozone NAAQS. Thus, the District of Columbia, as a state within the OTR,
remains subject to RACT requirements for both the 1997 ozone NAAQS and
the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On February 16, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Cir. Court) issued an opinion
on the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule. South Coast Air Quality
Management District v. EPA, 882 F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018) (``South
Coast II''). The D.C. Cir. Court found certain parts unreasonable
and vacated those provisions accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addressing RACT, the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule continued
most of the RACT provisions and policy for RACT requirements under
section 182 and 184 of the CAA issued in the Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule. In the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA
required RACT measures to be implemented by January 1, 2017 for areas
classified as moderate nonattainment or above and all areas of the OTR.
EPA also provided in the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule that RACT
SIPs must contain adopted RACT regulations, certifications that
existing provisions continue to meet RACT, and/or negative declarations
stating that there are no sources in the nonattainment area covered by
a specific Control Technique Guideline (CTG) source category. States
must submit appropriate supporting information for their RACT
submissions, in accordance with Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule. Adequate documentation must support that states
have considered control technology that is economically and
technologically feasible in determining RACT, based on information that
is current at the time of development of the RACT SIP. EPA also
recognized that states may conclude in some cases that sources already
addressed by RACT determinations for the 1-hour and/or 1997 ozone NAAQS
may not need to implement additional controls to meet the 2008 ozone
NAAQS RACT requirement. See 80 FR 12278-12279 (March 6, 2015).
C. Applicability of RACT Requirements in the District of Columbia
Since 1990, the District of Columbia implemented numerous RACT
controls throughout the District of Columbia to
[[Page 47917]]
meet the CAA RACT requirements under the 1-hour and the 1997 ozone
standards. The District of Columbia was first subject to NOX
RACT requirements as a serious (later reclassified to severe) ozone
nonattainment area under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS and as a moderate
nonattainment area under the 1997 ozone NAAQS. The District of
Columbia's first NOX RACT rules were adopted and codified as
Section 805 (Section 805) under Title 20 of the District of Columbia
Municipal Regulations (20 DCMR), Chapter 8--Asbestos, Sulfur and
Nitrogen Oxides, and adopted other supporting provisions in 20 DCMR
Chapter 1 (relating to definitions and abbreviations) and in Chapter 5
(relating to source monitoring and reporting). Section 805 was
originally effective in 1993 with amendments in 2000 and 2004. See 65
FR 81369 (December 26, 2000); 69 FR 77645 (December 28, 2004); and 69
FR 77647 (December 28, 2004). For the 1997 ozone NAAQS, the District of
Columbia revised and promulgated its RACT regulations and demonstrated
that it complied with the CAA RACT requirements in a SIP revision (1997
RACT SIP) approved by EPA on June 16, 2009 (74 FR 28447). The District
of Columbia has no outstanding ozone RACT requirements for the 1-hour
and 1997 ozone NAAQS.
Under the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the District of Columbia is classified
as marginal nonattainment and therefore has no RACT requirements due to
its designation and classification as an ozone nonattainment area.
However, because the District of Columbia is part of the OTR
established under section 184 of the CAA, the District of Columbia has
obligations under the OTR RACT requirements of CAA sections 184(b) and
182(f).
RACT applies to major stationary sources of NOX and VOC
under each ozone NAAQS or any VOC sources subject to CTG RACT. Because
the District of Columbia's NOX RACT SIP revision is the only
subject of this notice of proposed rulemaking, the VOC RACT
requirements in the District of Columbia will not be discussed further.
II. Summary of the District of Columbia's SIP Revision
A. Overview
On August 29, 2018 and supplemented on December 19, 2018, DOEE
submitted a revision to the District of Columbia's SIP to address all
the requirements of NOX RACT set forth by the CAA under the
2008 ozone NAAQS (the 2008 NOX RACT Submission). This SIP
revision includes amendments to 20 DCMR, Chapter 8, sections 805.1
(Section 805.1, relating to applicability), and 805.4 (Section 805.4,
emissions limits for stationary combustion turbines) and to 20 DCMR
Chapter 1, Section 199 (Section 199, relating to definitions).
B. Main Components of the SIP Revision
The District of Columbia's 2008 NOX RACT Submission
includes:
1. New regulations for certain stationary combustion turbine-
cogeneration (or combined heat and power (CHP) systems) emissions
sources that have come on line at four major stationary sources of
NOX in the District of Columbia since the 1997 RACT SIP was
developed.\3\ The new regulations also set NOX RACT
emissions limits for any additional combustion turbine in the
categories regulated beyond those existing in the District of Columbia
on the date, December 14, 2018, the new emissions limits in the 2008
NOX RACT Submission were adopted. These regulatory changes
include changes in the applicability provisions of Section 805 and
include the addition of new definitions needed by the addition of or
revisions to the NOX emission limits for the recently
installed categories of combustion turbines. The former Section 805.4
only set NOX emissions limits for combustion turbines of
over 100 million British Thermal Units per hour (mmBTU per hour) heat
input burning fuel oil; the new regulations in the 2008 NOX
RACT Submission for stationary combustion turbines set NOX
limits for turbines over 50 mmBTU per hour burning fuel oil which are
as stringent or more stringent than the prior limits. Specifically,
these amendments to 20 DCMR, Chapter 8, include changes to
applicability in Section 805.1, emissions limits for stationary
combustion turbines in Section 805.4, and definitions in Section 199;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Hereafter, ``combustion turbine'' will mean ``stationary
combustion turbine.'' As used in Section 805.4 and defined in 20
DCMR Chapter 1, Section 199, a ``stationary combustion turbine''
means that the combustion turbine is not self-propelled or intended
to be propelled while performing its function. It may, however, be
mounted on a vehicle for portability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Source-specific RACT determinations for three flares and one
auxiliary boiler that are located at the Blue Plains Advanced
Wastewater Treatment Plant (BPAWTP) that are unique to the District of
Columbia. The DOEE opted to set the NOX RACT limits for
those sources by adding to the District of Columbia SIP those specific
NOX emission limitations, which the DOEE has determined are
NOX RACT, in an operating permit;
3. For all other sources at major stationary sources of
NOX in the District of Columbia, a certification that the
NOX emissions limits found in Section 805, which were
implemented and approved into the District of Columbia's SIP under the
1-hour and the 1997 ozone NAAQS, are still RACT with the exception of:
(a) The revised emissions limits for stationary combustion turbines
found in Section 805.4; (b) the source-specific RACT determinations at
the BPAWTP; and (c) the other new regulatory provisions relating to
definitions and source monitoring; and
4. Amendments to the existing Section 805.4 to remove carbon
monoxide (CO) emissions limits relating to combustion turbines of over
100 mmBTU per hour heat input burning fuel oil because there are no
longer any such emissions units in the District of Columbia.
III. EPA's Evaluation of the District of Columbia's SIP Revision
A. New Emissions Limits for Combustion Turbines and Conforming
Amendments
The District of Columbia's NOX RACT SIP revision
contains a final rule amending 20 DCMR, Chapter 8, Section 805.4 to
amend the District of Columbia's NOX emission limits for
combustion turbines and for any duct burners or associated heat
recovery steam generators. Emissions limits are set for combustion
turbines depending upon the peak heat input rating of the combustion
turbine and type of fuel burned. The amendments also include the
addition of conforming definitions and abbreviations to the
applicability provisions of Section 805.1 to clarify that any
associated heat recovery steam generators and duct burners were subject
to Section 805. Further, the amendments amend Section 199 ``Definitions
And Abbreviations'' to add definitions for new terms found in Section
805.4 and to remove CO emissions limits for combustion turbines of over
100 mmBTU per hour heat input burning fuel oil (discussed further in
section III. D. of this document).
1. Amendments to Section 805.1 Applicability of Section 805
Section 805.4, prior to the 2008 NOX RACT Submission,
established NOX RACT standards for combustion turbines with
heat input capacities of 100 mmBTU per hour or more. Since the final
rulemaking of Section 805 published on April 16, 2004, all
[[Page 47918]]
combustion turbines located in the District of Columbia with heat input
capacities of 100 mmBTU per hour or more have been decommissioned.
Volume 65, No. 30 of the District of Columbia Register (DCR), page
007876, July 27, 2018. However, several new combustion turbines with
heat input capacities less than 100 mmBTU per hour and in some cases
associated heat recovery steam generators and duct burners have been
installed at major stationary sources of NOX since that
time. The amendments to Section 805.4 in the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission set NOX emission limits for such smaller units,
and the DOEE now seeks to include the amendments into the District of
Columbia's SIP.
Sections 805.1(a) and 805.1(a)(2) regarding applicability of
Section 805 were amended to specify that Section 805 also applies to
any heat recovery steam generators and duct burners associated with
combustion turbines which are part of a turbine and to combustion
turbines of any size at a major stationary source of NOX.
EPA believes this change is approvable as the amended applicability
provisions clearly specify that all combustion turbines and any
associated heat recovery steam generators and duct burners at major
stationary sources of NOX are covered by the NOX
emission limits now set by Section 805.4.
2. New Emissions Limits for Combustion Turbines and Associated Heat
Recovery Steam Generators and Duct Burners
The DOEE amended Section 805.4 to establish presumptive
NOX RACT emissions limits for combustion turbines with heat
input capacities less than 100 mmBTU per hour. The DOEE set
NOX RACT limits for stationary combustion turbines based on
a review of emission levels achieved in practice at existing stationary
combustion turbines in the District of Columbia, emission limits set by
preconstruction permits, the new source performance standards (NSPS) in
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR), Part 60, subpart
KKKK Standards of Performance for Stationary Combustion Turbines (NSPS
subpart KKKK) and upon recommendations in an Ozone Transport Commission
(OTC) model rule.\4\ The DOEE revised 20 DMCR Section 805.4 to
establish these levels achieved in practice, NSPS or permit limits as
presumptive NOX RACT emission limits for the District of
Columbia's SIP. Most of the emissions limits are set in parts per
million by volume dry basis (ppmvd) corrected to 15 percent excess
oxygen (@15% O2) or (ppmvd @15% O2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The OTC recommendations are found in a ``model rule''
available on-line at https://otcair.org/upload/Documents/Model%20Rules/OTC%20Model%20Rule%20-%20HEDD%20Turbines%20Final.pdf
(last accessed and downloaded March 27, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 805.4 specifies that the applicability of its
NOX emissions limits shall be determined therein solely upon
the peak heat input rating of the combustion turbine without inclusion
of any additional heat input from associated heat recovery steam
generators or duct burners when determining the peak heat input to the
combustion turbine. Restricting applicability based solely on the
combustion turbine's heat input rating is the same as the applicability
provisions of the NSPS subpart KKKK. See 40 CFR 60.4305. The applicable
emissions limit depends on the date that construction, modification, or
reconstruction commenced, and whether duct burners of associated heat
recovery steam generators are used.
Under the revised Section 805.4 submitted in the 2008
NOX RACT Submission the NOX emission limits for
combustion turbines are 25 ppmvd @15% O2 when burning
gaseous fuels except for combustion turbines under 10 mmBTU per hour
heat input capacity burning only natural gas. For units with heat input
ratings of less than or equal to 50 mmBTU per hour, the Section 805.4
limits are 25 ppmvd @15% O2 when burning gaseous fuels and
of 42 ppmvd @15% O2 when burning liquid fuels; these limits
are more stringent than the NSPS subpart KKKK standards when burning
natural gas and when burning ``fuels other than natural gas,''
respectively. For units with heat input ratings of greater than 50
mmBTU per hour, the NOX emission limit is 74 ppmvd @15%
O2 when burning liquid fuels which is the same as that found
in NSPS subpart KKKK. When construction, modification, or
reconstruction commenced on or after February 18, 2005, this 74 ppmvd
limit also applies. For any combustion turbine of greater than 50 mmBTU
per hour heat input capacity for which construction, modification, or
reconstruction commenced before February 18, 2005, the emission limit
is twenty hundredths (0.20) pounds per million BTU heat input (calendar
day average) when burning any fuel or combinations if the duct burners
are in use.
The NOX emission limits in Section 805.4 before adoption
of the limits in the 2008 NOX RACT submission were 75 ppmvd
@15% O2 and applied to oil-fired, combustion turbines with a
heat input over 100 mmBTU per hour. The amended Section 805.4 sets a
NOX emission limit of 74 ppmvd @15% O2 for
stationary combustion turbines of greater than 50 mmBTU per hour heat
input capacity when burning liquid fuels. Oil would constitute a liquid
fuel under the new definition (discussed in the next section of this
document) found in Section 199. Therefore, the amended Section 805.4
sets a limit which is slightly more stringent for oil-fired stationary
combustion turbines of greater than 100 mmBTU per hour heat input
capacity than what existed before adoption of the 2008 NOX
RACT Submission. EPA finds that revising Section 805.4 with the
regulatory changes of the 2008 NOX RACT Submission
strengthens the SIP with respect to oil-fired stationary combustion
turbines of greater than 100 mmBTU per hour heat input capacity.
When burning a mixture of fuels, the gaseous fuels limit applies if
the percentage of heat input from gaseous fuels is greater than or
equal to 50 percent; if the heat input from liquid fuels is greater
than 50 percent, the liquid fuel limit applies. This provision is
analogous to the NSPS subpart KKKK provisions for mixed fuel firing (40
CFR 60.4325) except when Section 805.4 specifies ``gaseous fuels'' and
``liquid fuels'' the NSPS specifies ``natural gas'' and ``fuels other
than natural gas,'' respectively.
The District of Columbia has one facility with combustion turbines
that can burn ``digestor gas'' which is made by treating sewage. Under
the NSPS subpart KKKK such a unit would have to comply with the NSPS
limits for ``fuels other than natural gas'' when burning ``digestor
gas.'' Under the revised Section 805.4 a combustion turbine burning
``digestor gas'' must meet the same NOX limits for
combustion turbines burning natural gas or any other gaseous fuel due
to the definition adopted for ``gaseous fuel.''
3. Definitions Added to Section 199
The amended regulations also add definitions to Section 199
``Definitions and Abbreviations'' for ``duct burner,'' ``gaseous
fuel,'' ``heat recovery steam generating unit,'' ``liquid fuel,''
``natural gas'' and ``combustion turbine.'' See Section 199.1. EPA
believes that these definitions are necessary to define what exact
sources are subject to Section 805.4 and when specific limits apply by
fuel type.
With two exceptions, the definitions added to Section 199.1 are the
same as those found in the NSPS subpart KKKK (40 CFR 60.4420). The two
exceptions are the definitions for ``gaseous fuel''
[[Page 47919]]
and ``liquid fuel.'' The NSPS subpart KKKK needs to define ``natural
gas'' because the NSPS subpart KKKK distinguishes NOX
emissions limits for stationary combustion turbines burning only
natural gas from units burning ``fuels other than natural gas.''
Section 199.1 defines ``gaseous fuel'' with the criterion of a fuel
that is in ``a gaseous state at standard atmospheric temperature and
pressure under ordinary conditions.'' This definition includes fuels
that under the NSPS Subpart KKKK would be a fuel other than natural gas
and subject to higher limits than those applicable to units burning
natural gas. Under the Section 199.1 amendment, ``natural gas'' is a
subset of ``gaseous fuel.'' Section 199.1 defines ``liquid fuel'' as
``any fuel that maintains a liquid state at standard atmospheric
temperature and pressure.'' The net effect of these differences in
definitions is that Section 805.4 sets more stringent limits than NSPS
subpart KKKK for some fuels other than natural gas. The amended
regulations in the 2008 NOX RACT Submission also add to
Section 199.2 the abbreviation ``ppmvd'' to mean ``Parts Per Million by
Volume Dry Basis.''
4. Applicable Affected Source Threshold
EPA only requires that when implementing a revised ozone NAAQS, a
state must review and update NOX RACT only for those
stationary sources of NOX that are ``major threshold'' with
an area's classification under the revised ozone NAAQS. Because the
District of Columbia has been designated as a marginal nonattainment
area in the OTR the RACT obligation for the 2008 ozone NAAQS applies
only to major stationary sources of 100 tpy PTE or more of
NOX. The District of Columbia's emissions limitations for
stationary combustion turbines in the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission apply to combustion turbines at stationary sources with a
PTE of 25 tpy or more of NOX because the District of
Columbia retains the 25 tpy PTE applicability threshold found in
Section 805.1 required under the District of Columbia's severe
classification under the 1-hour NAAQS. In the preamble to the proposed
rule for the amendments to Section 805, the District of Columbia
provided notice that then proposed (now final) combustion turbine
emissions limits would apply to any combustion turbines located at a
stationary source with the PTE of 25 tpy or more of NOX.
Volume 65, No. 30, of the District of Columbia Register, Page 007877,
July 27, 2018. This makes the 2008 NOX RACT Submission more
stringent than that required for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
5. Other Provisions
Section 805.4 sets a maintenance standard for combustion turbines
with a heat input rating less than or equal to 10 mmBTU per hour and
fired exclusively on natural gas. Section 805.4 also has a requirement
that any combustion turbine subject to Section 805 shall always be
maintained and operated in a manner consistent with good air pollution
control practices for minimizing emissions, including during startup,
shutdown, and malfunction.
Additionally, Section 805.4 prohibits any combustion turbine fired
on coal or a synthetic fuel derived from coal and requires any
combustion turbine designed to be fired on any solid fuel other than
coal or a synthetic fuel derived from any other solid than coal to have
a case-by-case RACT determined pursuant to Section 805.7 (already in
the SIP) for approval by EPA as a revision to the District of
Columbia's SIP.
6. EPA Analysis
The DOEE NOX RACT regulation is based on current
technologies for combustion turbines, without the addition of add-on
controls such as selective catalytic reduction (SCR). DOEE's review was
based on a review of emission levels achieved in practice by the
existing sources within the District of Columbia and by sources subject
to the NSPS subpart KKKK or by sources subject to a lowest achievable
emission rate (LAER) determination limits set by a preconstruction
permit.\5\ The District of Columbia's limits were set based upon the
comparability to those established for new units according to the NSPS
Subpart KKKK or permits for units with heat input ratings exceeding 50
mmBTU per hour. For units with heat input ratings less than or equal to
50 mmBTU per hour, the DOEE set limits more stringent than the NSPS
Subpart KKKK standards based upon 2010 recommendations made by the OTC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ CAA section 171 defines LAER as the most stringent rate of
emissions based on the following: (1) The most stringent emissions
limitation which is contained in the implementation plan of any
State for such class or category of stationary source, unless the
owner or operator of the proposed stationary source demonstrates
that such limitations are not achievable; or (2) The most stringent
emissions limitation which is achieved in practice by such class or
category of stationary sources. In no event shall the application of
the term permit a proposed new or modified stationary source to emit
any pollutant in excess of the amount allowable under an applicable
NSPS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DOEE evaluated technically feasible add-on controls, such as
SCR, as RACT for this source category but determined that heavy
investment in additional end-of-pipe controls to this level is not
economically feasible or cost effective with respect to the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. The Department estimated a cost per ton of NOX
reductions of $13,794 for small turbines (in the 5-megawatt range)
currently found in the District of Columbia.
EPA finds that the RACT determination provided by the District of
Columbia is reasonable and appropriately considered technically and
economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits
to adequately meet RACT under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for these
categories of combustion turbines. EPA finds that the District of
Columbia has set presumptive RACT emissions limits for stationary
combustion turbines for existing major stationary sources of
NOX in the District of Columbia. EPA finds that revising
Section 805.4 with the regulatory changes of the 2008 NOX
RACT Submission strengthens the SIP with respect to oil-fired
stationary combustion turbines of greater than 100 mm BTU per hour heat
input capacity and can be approved.
B. District of Columbia Water Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Plant Source Specific NOX RACT
The DOEE issued a permit to District of Columbia Water and Sewer
Authority (DC Water) to construct and operate new biosolids handling
facilities located at the BPAWTP. The equipment to be installed and
operated included: (1) A main process train that includes four thermal
hydrolysis process trains (for thermally hydrolyzed sludge digestion)
and two emergency flares rated at 126 mmBTU per hour heat input for
each firing digestor gas, and (2) a CHP system that includes three
stationary combustion turbines each with a duct burner, one auxiliary
boiler of 62.52 mmBTU per hour heat input, and one ``siloxane
destruction flare'' rated at 6.14 mmBTU per hour. The two emergency
flares of the main process train and the auxiliary boiler and the
siloxane destruction flare in the CHP system emit NOX and
are subject to the NOX RACT source specific determination
requirements
For the CHP system and the two emergency flares of the main process
train, DOEE issued the BPAWTP a permit to operate on April 20, 2018
(April 20, 2018 operating permit) pursuant to 20 DCMR Section 200.2.
The equipment covered by the April 20, 2018 operating permit covered
the combustion turbines and associated duct burners plus the auxiliary
boiler
[[Page 47920]]
and flares that burn digester gas.\6\ The NOX emission
limits for the permitted equipment were established through a non-
attainment new source review process in 2011/2012 and the installed
emission controls were determined to be LAER at that time. Prior to
issuing the final April 20, 2018 operating permit, the DOEE conducted a
review of the emissions limits and determined that these combustion
turbines, heat recovery steam generators with duct burners (covered
under the amended Section 805.4), and an auxiliary boiler are still
among the best performing units in EPA's RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse
for broadly similar applications and are therefore at least as
stringent as RACT.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ NOX RACT for the three 46.3 mmBTU per hour
combustion turbines and heat recovery steam generators each equipped
with a 21 mmBTU per hour heat input duct burner is set under the
revised Section 805.4.
\7\ BACT stands for best available control technology and is a
requirement for certain preconstruction permits under CAA Title I,
Part C (prevention of significant deterioration).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part of the review of the April 20, 2018 operating permit included
a reevaluation of the NOX limits for the digester gas-fired
auxiliary boiler and the three flares at the facility based upon actual
performance. The DOEE concluded that, due to higher concentrations of
ammonia in the digester gas compared to that resulting from other
sewage digester systems, the three flares and the boiler would each
inherently emit more NOX than the typical flares and
auxiliary boilers fired with digestor gas. The DOEE concluded that this
is due to the difference in digestion processes. The BPAWTP uses a
different digestion technology--thermally hydrolyzed sludge digestion--
which is the first of its kind in the United States. As such, even
though the BPAWTP uses a flare used in other digester gas applications,
the NOX levels exiting the flare are higher due to the
increased fuel-bound nitrogen. Based upon this 2018 review of the
performance of the auxiliary boiler and the three flares, the DOEE
concluded that the NOX emission limits and associated
control technologies in the April 20, 2018 permit for the digester gas-
fired auxiliary boiler and the three flares at the facility meet or
exceed RACT requirements because these limits were based upon the
DOEE's LAER, which by definition cannot be less stringent than RACT and
often results in more stringent control than RACT.
With the 2008 NOX RACT Submission, the DOEE submitted a
redacted version of the April 20, 2018 operating permit, which includes
only those provisions related to the NOX RACT determination.
A copy of the redacted April 20, 2018 operating permit is in the docket
for this proposed action. The emissions limits, testing or reporting
requirements for other pollutants such as particulate matter, sulfur
dioxide, carbon monoxide have been redacted so as not to be submitted
for inclusion in the SIP. The following Table 1 provides a summary of
the NOX emission limits.
Table 1--NOX Limits for BPAWTP Auxiliary Boiler and Flares
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Siloxane destruction Emergency flares
Auxiliary boiler (AB) flare (SF) (each)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heat Input capacity--mmBTU per hour 62.52 on DG................ 6.14 on DG............ 126 on DG.
61.79 on NG................
NOX limit (pounds NOX/mmBTU)....... 0.034 on DG................ 0.06 on DG............ 0.101 on DG.
0.032 on NG................
Mass limit NOX pounds per hour..... 2.11 on any percentage of 0.37.................. 12.72.
DG.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
``DG'' means digestor gas; ``NG'' means natural gas.
EPA finds that the RACT determination provided by the District of
Columbia is reasonable and appropriately considered technically and
economically feasible controls while setting lowest achievable limits
to adequately meet RACT on a source specific basis under the 2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS for these emissions units. EPA finds that source
specific limits are appropriate because the source category, related to
municipal wastewater treatment, is unique within the District of
Columbia. These limits were set on technology consistent with LAER
which essentially reflects the lowest rate in any SIP or achieved in
practice and are based upon the actual performance of the emissions
units.
C. Certification of Other Provisions in Section 805
Prior to the amendments submitted with the 2008 NOX RACT
Submission, Section 805 contained the District of Columbia's
NOX RACT controls as amended in 2004 for implementation and
approval into the District of Columbia SIP under the 1-hour and the
1997 ozone NAAQS. The District of Columbia's 2008 NOX RACT
Submission includes a certification that the controls of the 2004
version of Section 805 are still RACT except for those sources for
which the District of Columbia submitted new NOX RACT
emissions limits in the 2008 NOX RACT Submission. These
sources are: (1) The new limits for combustion turbines at several
major NOX sources (see section III. A. in this document);
and (2) the digester gas equipment at one major NOX source
(see section III. B. in this document regarding the BPAWTP).
Section 805 was originally adopted in 1993 and amended in 2000 and
2004. The District of Columbia's NOX RACT emissions limits
are specified by source groups. Table 2 lists the rulemaking history of
District of Columbia's previously adopted NOX RACT controls,
and Table 2 lists the source groups covered by Section 805. In the 2008
RACT Submission, the District of Columbia is certifying that with
certain exceptions (the amendments to Section 805.4 and the unit
specific limits at the BPAWTP), Section 805 continues to represent the
lowest emission limits based on currently available and economically
feasible control technology for the source categories and, therefore,
meets the RACT requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for major
NOX stationary sources as required by CAA sections 184(b)(2)
and 182(f).
[[Page 47921]]
Table 2--District of Columbia's NOX RACT Controls--Rulemaking History of SIP Approved Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective Federal Register Federal Register
Regulation 20 DCMR Submittal date date notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
805............................ Original 1-hour ozone Nov. 19, 1993 and Dec. 26, 2000.... 65 FR 81369.
submittal. Dec. 8, 2000.
805............................ Minor clarifications.. April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77645.
805 and 199.1.................. Set applicability April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77647.
threshold to 25 tpy
NOX--severe
nonattainment area
under 1-hour NAAQS.
805............................ Certify as RACT under September 22, June 16, 2009.... 74 FR 28447.
1997 ozone NAAQS. 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--District of Columbia's NOX RACT Controls--Rulemaking History of SIP Approved Provisions by Source
Category
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective Federal effective Federal Register
Regulation 20 DCMR Title of regulation date date notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
805.1.......................... Fuel-burning equipment April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77645.
with an input
capacity of 100 mmBTU
per hour or greater.
805.5 & 805.8.................. Fuel-burning equipment April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77645.
with an input
capacity equal to or
greater than 20 mmBTU
per hour, but less
than 50 mmBTU per
hour.
805.1 & 805.8.................. Fuel-burning equipment April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77645.
with an input
capacity equal to or
greater than 50 but
less than mmBTU per
hour.
805.4.......................... Combustion turbines... Nov. 27, 2018.... See Sections D.1. See Sections D.1.
above and D.4. above and D.4.
below . below .
805.1.......................... Asphalt concrete plant April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77645.
with a PTE 25 tpy or
greater.
805.1.......................... All other fuel burning April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77645.
equipment with a PTE
of 25 tpy of NOX or
greater.
805.1.......................... Stationary internal April 16, 2004... Dec. 28, 2004.... 69 FR 77645.
combustion engines.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most recent revision or amendment.
The revisions to Section 805.4 discussed in sections D.1. above and D.4. below completely revise Section
805.4. EPA action of these revisions is the subject of this action.
Section 805 (as amended) provides presumptive NOX limits
for major stationary sources of NOX but also provides for a
case-by-case RACT determination process. The DOEE evaluated their
stationary source inventory and current controls against RACT emission
limits of other States. The DOEE compared the SIPs of other similarly-
situated States in the Eastern United States (Virginia, Maryland, North
Carolina, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, and
Massachusetts) to the District of Columbia's current emissions limits
and found that DOEE's Section 805 limits were in the same range. Based
upon such considerations, the DOEE concluded that, when combined with
the amendments to Section 805 and the source specific NOX
RACT determination for the BPAWTP, that no further controls were needed
to meet RACT.
In combination with the amendments to Sections 199 and 805
regarding certain combustion turbines and related equipment (evaluated
in sections III.A of this document) and with the source-specific
NOX RACT determinations for the flares and auxiliary boiler
at BPAWTP (evaluated in sections III.B of this document), EPA proposes
to find that the previously adopted RACT controls continue to represent
NOX RACT for the 2008 ozone NAAQS required under sections
184(b)(2) and 182(f).
D. Removal of Prior Emissions Limits for Combustion Turbines Over 100
mmBTU per Hour
The District of Columbia's amendment to Section 805.4 removes
emission limits of 75 ppmvd NOX, corrected to 15% excess
oxygen for oil-fired, combustion turbines with a heat input over 100
mmBTU per hour from the SIP in the former Section 805.4(a); the former
Section 805.4 also restricted CO emissions not to exceed 50 ppmvd @15%
O2 at any operating condition, for a one (1) hour average.
Regarding NOX emissions, the revised Section 805.4 sets
a lower emissions limit for stationary combustion turbines of this
size. The revised Section 805.4(a) sets a lower NOX limit of
74 @15% O2 for any combustion turbine with heat input rating
greater than 50 mmBTU per hour burning any combination of liquid fuels.
The revised rule also removes the exemption for low utilization
turbines--those operated for less than 500 hours per year. Thus, the
NOX limits set in Section 805.4 apply. If any combustion
turbines over 100 mmBTU per hour are installed in the District of
Columbia in the future such that the PTE increase is over 25 tpy
NOX, the District of Columbia SIP major source permitting
program requires an emissions rate of LAER and offsetting
NOX emissions at a ratio of 1.3:1. See 20 DCMR Chapter 2,
Section 204 (Permit Requirements for Sources Affecting Non-attainment
Areas), which is approved into the SIP at 40 CFR 52.470(c).
For CO emissions, there are no longer any units over 100 mmBTU per
hour heat input in the District of Columbia. Therefore, this change
will not result in relaxing an existing emissions limitation applicable
to any existing emissions unit at a major stationary source.
Furthermore, the CO levels in the
[[Page 47922]]
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD area are well below the CO
NAAQS of 40 CFR 50.8. The maximum value recorded at any ambient air
quality monitor in the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD core
based statistical area is only 27 percent (2.6 ppm CO) of the 9.5 ppm
(8-hour average) NAAQS and less than 8 percent of the 35 ppm (1-hour
average) NAAQS.
For CO, any new stationary combustion turbine or turbines added in
the future that are by themselves a major stationary source of CO or
would constitute a significant net emissions increase at an existing
major stationary source of CO (or nitrogen dioxide) would be required
to obtain a prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permit under
40 CFR 52.499 and 52.21. The PSD permit would require best available
control technology.
EPA finds that removal of the CO limits will not hinder or impede
attainment or maintenance of the CO NAAQS in the District of Columbia.
As far as the ozone or nitrogen dioxide NAAQS, EPA concludes that the
replacement of the former 75 ppmvd NOX limits with the 74
ppmvd limits applicable to liquid fuel fired stationary combustion
turbines will be as protective of these NAAQS.
E. Summary
EPA finds that the District of Columbia's 2008 NOX RACT
Submission is reasonable and demonstrates that the District has adopted
air pollution control strategies that represent RACT for the purposes
of compliance with the 2008 8-hour ozone standard for all major
stationary sources of NOX in the District in accordance with
the Phase 2 Ozone Implementation Rule, the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements
Rule, and the latest available information. EPA finds that the District
of Columbia's SIP implements RACT with respect to all existing major
stationary sources of NOX.
EPA also finds that the proposed revisions to previously SIP
approved RACT requirements will result in equivalent or additional
reductions in NOX emissions and should not interfere with
any applicable requirement or reasonable further progress with the
NAAQS or interfere with other applicable CAA requirements in section
110(l) of the CAA.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the District of Columbia's 2008 RACT
Submission on the basis that the District of Columbia has met the
NOX RACT requirements under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS per
CAA sections 182(f) and 184(b)(2) for the reasons explained in this
notice. EPA is proposing to approve source specific NOX RACT
determinations for the BPAWTP and the amendments to sections 199.1,
199.2, 805.1 and 805.4 of 20 DCMR discussed in sections III. A. III. D.
and V. A. of this document.
The District of Columbia's SIP revision is based on: (1)
Certification that for certain categories of sources, previously
adopted RACT controls in the District of Columbia's SIP that were
approved by EPA under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS and 1997 ozone NAAQS
continue to be technically and economically feasible controls, and
continue to represent RACT for the 2008 ozone NAAQS implementation
purposes; (2) the adoption of new or more stringent regulations or
controls into the District of Columbia's SIP that represent presumptive
RACT control levels for certain categories of sources; and (3) source
specific emissions limits set for flares and an auxiliary boiler
serving the BPAWTP. EPA is proposing to remove, in accordance with
section 110 of the CAA, provisions setting carbon monoxide emission
limits for a category of stationary combustion turbines. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before taking final action.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing for certain
categories of NOX emissions at major stationary sources of
NOX emissions to incorporate by reference both regulations
adopted by the District of Columbia and a source-specific RACT
determinations under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS found within a
preconstruction permit. The amendments to and revision of 20 DCMR
Chapters 1 and 8 are specified in Section V. A. of this document; the
source specific information is provided in Section V. B of this
document.
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III
Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further
Information Contact section of this preamble for more information).
A. Amendments to 20 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations (20
DCMR)
1. Specifically, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference into
40 CFR 52.470(c): Amendments to 20 District of Columbia Municipal
Regulations, Chapter 1, sections 199.1 and 199.2. These amendments
include adding definitions in Section 199.1 for ``Duct burner,''
``Gaseous fuel,'' Heat recovery steam generator,'' ``Liquid fuel,''
``Natural gas,'' and ``Stationary combustion turbine,'' and include an
amendment to Section 199.2 to define the abbreviation ``ppmvd.''
2. Amendments to 20 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations,
Chapter 8, sections 805.1 and 805.4 adopted by the District of Columbia
on November 14, 2018 and effective December 14, 2018 as published in
Volume 65, Number 51 of the District of Columbia Register on December
14, 2018. These amendments would include:
(1) Revising sections 805.1(a) and Section 805.1(a)(1);
(2) Revising Section 805.1(a)(1) to remove NOX emissions
limits for stationary combustion turbines which have an energy input
capacity of one hundred million (100,000,000) BTU and adding
NOX emissions limitations for any stationary combustion
turbine which commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction
after February 18, 2005 and has a heat input rating greater than fifty
million (50,000,000) BTU per hour;
3. Revising Section 805.1(a)(2) to remove CO emissions limits for
stationary combustion turbines which have an energy input capacity of
one hundred million (100,000,000) BTU per hour and adding
NOX emissions limitations for any stationary combustion
turbine which commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction
on or before February 18, 2005 and has a heat input rating greater than
fifty million (50,000,000) BTU per hour;
4. Adding a new Section 805.1(a)(3) to set NOX emission
limitations for any stationary combustion turbines with a heat input
rating less than or equal to fifty million (50,000,000) BTU per hour;
5. Adding a new Section 805.1(a)(4) to set NOX emission
limitations for certain stationary combustion turbines with a heat
input rating less than or equal to ten million (10,000,000) BTU per
hour;
6. Adding new sections 805.1(a)(5)-(7) to add new restrictions on
stationary combustion turbines;
7. Amending Section 805.4(b) to replace requirements for stationary
combustion turbines with an energy input capacity of one hundred
million (100,000,000) BTU per hour or greater which is operated for
less than five hundred (500) hours per year with testing and continuous
monitoring
[[Page 47923]]
requirements for any person required to comply with Section 805.4.
These regulatory changes to Section 805.4 and Section 199 were
adopted on November 27, 2018 and effective on the date of publication,
December 14, 2018, in the District of Columbia Register (Vol. 65,
Number 51, page 013499, December 14, 2018).
B. Source Specific Provisions for the BPAWTP
Specifically, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference into 40
CFR 52.470(d) certain portions of Permit (No. 6372-C2/O) to Construct
and Operate New Biosolids Handling Facilities issued to District of
Columbia Water and Sewer Authority as redacted by the District of
Columbia:
1. The first paragraph citing the pertinent permitting regulations
and listing (redacted) the following significant components: One (1)
Auxiliary Boiler (AB) rated at 62.52 mmBTU per hour (HHV) heat input,
firing DG, One (1) Siloxane Destruction Flare (SF) rated at 6.14 MMBTU
per hour heal input, firing DG; and Two (2) Emergency Flares rated at
126 mmBTU per hour heat input each, firing DG.
2. The NOX emissions limits listed in the table found in
permit condition ``j.'' for the Auxiliary Boiler (AB), Siloxane
Destruction Flare (SF) and Two (2) Emergency Flares. The hourly
NOX emission limits for the Auxiliary Boiler (AB), Siloxane
Destruction Flare (SF) and Two (2) Emergency Flares listed in Table 2
(as redacted) found under Condition III.
3. Conditions III.b.1.A.; III.b.3. A. and B.; III.b.3. C.i., iii
and iv.; III.b.3.D.; III.b.3.E. except that relating to carbon
monoxide/CO; III.b.3.F. except ``and CO''; III.b.3.G, iv. and v. except
the provision ``Failure to demonstrate compliance through the testing
may result in enforcement action.''; III.b.4.A.; III.b.4.B. iv. and v.;
III.b.5. as redacted to strike ``in addition to complying with
Condition II(f)''; III.d., III.d.1.A; III.d.2.D; III.d.3.A. only the
portion ``Within 60 days of initial startup and once every five years
thereafter, the Permittee shall conduct a Department-approved
compliance source test at multiple loads of EF-l, EF-2, and SF in
accordance with 40 CFR 60.8 or a similar protocol acceptable to the
Department, to demonstrate compliance with the emissions limitations
contained in Condition III(d)(1) of this permit;'' III.d.3.B as
redacted to exclude ``though additional testing may be required at
other times pursuant to Condition II(d)(2)''; III.d.3.C. (i), (iii) and
(iv); III.d.3.D.; III.d.3.H.(iv); III.d.3.H.(v) except ``Failure to
demonstrate compliance through the test may result in enforcement
action.''; III.d.4.A. except ``including records of visual
inspections,''; III.d.4.B. (ii) except ``and CO''; III.d.4.B. (iv);
and, III.d.5.A. as redacted to exclude ``in addition to complying with
Condition II(f)''.
4. This permit was issued April 20, 2018.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, regarding the NOX RACT
SIP for the District of Columbia under the 2008 ozone NAAQS, does not
have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 29, 2019.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2019-19669 Filed 9-10-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P