Special Local Regulation; Lake Havasu City, AZ, 46682-46684 [2019-19119]

Download as PDF 46682 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 172 / Thursday, September 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations includes all DoD component exemption rules. Therefore, the regulation is now unnecessary and may be removed from the CFR. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY This rule is effective on September 5, 2019. 33 CFR Part 100 DATES: [Docket Number USCG–2019–0568] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracy Rogers at 571–515–0248. RIN 1625–AA08 DoD now has a single DoD-level Privacy Program rule at 32 CFR part 310 (84 FR 14728) that contains all the codified information required for the Department. The Department of the Army Privacy Act Program regulation at 32 CFR part 505 is no longer required and may be removed. It has been determined that publication of this CFR part removal for public comment is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public interest since it is based on the removal of policies and procedures that are either now reflected in another CFR part, 32 CFR part 310, or are publically available on the Army’s website. To the extent that Army internal guidance concerning the implementation of the Privacy Act within the Army is necessary, it will continue to be published in Army Regulation 25–22 (available at https://armypubs.army.mil/ epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ ARN13587_R25_22_FINAL.pdf). This rule is one of 20 separate component privacy rules. With the finalization of the DoD-level Privacy rule at 32 CFR part 310, the Department eliminated the need for this component Privacy rule, thereby reducing costs to the public as explained in the preamble of the DoD-level Privacy rule published on April 11, 2019, at 84 FR 14728– 14811. This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ therefore, E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ does not apply. Special Local Regulation; Lake Havasu City, AZ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local regulation for the Havapalooza 2019 marine event that will be held on the navigable waters of Lake Havasu, Lake Havasu City, AZ. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters on Thompson Bay in Lake Havasu during a waterside concert on September 14, 2019. This rule prohibits spectators from anchoring, blocking, loitering or transiting through in the event area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector San Diego or a designated representative. SUMMARY: This rule is effective from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. on September 14, 2019. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019– 0568 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant Briana Biagas, Coast Guard; telephone 619–278–7656, email D11MarineEventsSD@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: I. Table of Abbreviations List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 505 CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code Administrative practice and procedure, Privacy program. II. Background Information and Regulatory History PART 505—[REMOVED] khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES Coast Guard Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 505 is removed. ■ Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2019–19148 Filed 9–4–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–03–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:33 Sep 04, 2019 Jkt 247001 The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. The Coast Guard was not notified of this event’s date until June 4, 2019. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish regulated area by September 14, 2019 and lack sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and consider those comments before issuing the rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest because immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of life on Lake Havasu. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1236). The Captain of the Port Sector San Diego (COTP) has determined that a large congregation of vessels in Thompson Bay associated with the Havapalooza 2019 marine event on September 14, 2019, poses a potential safety concern. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within Thompson Bay while the event is occurring. IV. Discussion of the Rule This rule establishes a temporary special local regulation from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. on September 14, 2019. This special local regulation establishes a spectator area covering all navigable waters of Thompson Bay shoreward of a line connected by the following points: Beginning at 34°27′55″ N, 114°20′48″ W (Point A); thence running southerly to 34°27′52″ N, 114°20′49″ W (Point B); thence running southeasterly to 34°27′49″ N, 114°20′47″ W (Point C); thence running southeasterly to 34°27′45″ N, 114°20′43″ W (Point D); thence running southeasterly to 34°27′40″ N, 114°20′34″ W (Point E) thence running southeasterly and ending at 34°27′37″ N, 114°20′27″ W (Point F). The duration of the regulated area is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled marine event. All non-event participants would be permitted to enter the regulated area without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM 05SER1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 172 / Thursday, September 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, duration, and time-of-day of the regulated area. Vessel traffic can safely transit around this regulated which would impact a an approximately 17,000 square yard area of Thompson Bay from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Moreover, the Coast Guard would make a post in the Local Notice to Mariners with details on the regulated area. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the temporary regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:33 Sep 04, 2019 Jkt 247001 jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 46683 State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a temporary regulated area that would limit access to an approximately 17,000 square yard area of Thompson bay from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L61 in Table 3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 100 as follows: PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON THE NAVIGABLE WATERS 1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05– 1. 2. Add § 100.1102T11–0568 to read as follows ■ § 100.1102T11–0568 Special Local Regulation; Lake Havasu City, AZ (a) Location: The following area is a special local regulation: all navigable waters of Thompson Bay shoreward of E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM 05SER1 46684 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 172 / Thursday, September 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations a line connected by the following points: Beginning at 34°27′55″ N, 114°20′48″ W (Point A); thence running southerly to 34°27′52″ N, 114°20′49″ W (Point B); thence running southeasterly to 34°27′49″ N, 114°20′47″ W (Point C); thence running southeasterly to 34°27′45″ N, 114°20′43″ W (Point D); thence running southeasterly to 34°27′40″ N, 114°20′34″ W (Point E) thence running southeasterly and ending at 34°27′37″ N, 114°20′27″ W (Point F). (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. on September 14, 2019. (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in § 100.35 of this part, entry into or remaining within this regulated area is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector San Diego (COTP) or a designated representative. (2) Vessels requiring entry into this regulated area must request permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be contacted on VHF–FM Channel 69 or by telephone at 562–447–0940. (3) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this area must transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued by the COTP or the designated representative. (d) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public of the enforcement times and date for this regulated area through Local Notice to Mariners. Dated: August 21, 2019. D.P. Montoro, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate, Captain of the Port Sector San Diego. [FR Doc. 2019–19119 Filed 9–4–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 300 EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0008; FRL–9999– 36–Region 3] khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion of the Strasburg Landfill Superfund Site Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 3 announces the deletion of the Strasburg Landfill Superfund Site (Site) located south and SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:33 Sep 04, 2019 Jkt 247001 slightly east of Strasburg Road in Newlin Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania from the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, through the Pennsylvania Department of Environment (PADEP, Southeast Region), have determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA, other than operation and maintenance (O&M), monitoring, and Five-Year Reviews, have been completed. However, this deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund. DATES: This action is effective September 5, 2019. ADDRESSES: Docket: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA–HQ–SFUND– 1989–0008. All documents in the docket are listed on the https:// www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through https:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the site information repositories. Locations, contacts, phone numbers and viewing hours are: USEPA Region III Administrative Records Room, 1650 Arch Street—6th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029, 215–814–3157, Business Hours: Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.– 4:30 p.m.; by appointment only. Local Repository, Bayard Taylor Memorial Library, 216 East State Street, Kennett Square, PA. 19358, Business Hours: Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Greaves, Remedial Project Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 3HS21 1650 Arch St. Philadelphia, PA. 19103, 215–814–5729, email greaves.david@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to be deleted from the NPL is: Strasburg Landfill Superfund Site, Strasburg Road, Newlin Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania. A Notice of Intent to PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Delete for this Site was published in the Federal Register (84 FR 31826) on July 3, 2019. The closing date for comments on the Notice of Intent to Delete was August 2, 2019. One public comment was received. The comment received was a request for EPA to make publicly available information on Site cleanup activities, estimates of future costs related to Site cleanup, and the actual costs when cleanup activities are completed. Since the comment is an informational request and is not an adverse comment regarding the deletion of this Site, EPA still believes this deletion action is appropriate. A responsiveness summary was prepared and placed in both the docket, EPA– HQ–SFUND–1989–0008, on www.regulations.gov, and in the local repositories listed above. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the environment. Deletion from the NPL does not preclude further remedial action. Whenever there is a significant release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system. Deletion of a site from the NPL does not affect responsible party liability in the unlikely event that future conditions warrant further actions. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water pollution control, Water supply. Dated: August 13, 2019. Cosmo Servidio, Regional Administrator, Region III. For reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows: PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. Appendix B to Part 300—[Amended] 2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300 is amended by removing ‘‘PA’’, ■ E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM 05SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 172 (Thursday, September 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46682-46684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19119]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0568]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Lake Havasu City, AZ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local 
regulation for the Havapalooza 2019 marine event that will be held on 
the navigable waters of Lake Havasu, Lake Havasu City, AZ. This action 
is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable 
waters on Thompson Bay in Lake Havasu during a waterside concert on 
September 14, 2019. This rule prohibits spectators from anchoring, 
blocking, loitering or transiting through in the event area unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector San Diego or a designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. on September 14, 
2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0568 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Lieutenant Briana Biagas, Coast Guard; telephone 619-278-
7656, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. The Coast Guard 
was not notified of this event's date until June 4, 2019. It is 
impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish regulated 
area by September 14, 2019 and lack sufficient time to provide a 
reasonable comment period and consider those comments before issuing 
the rule.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of 
this rule would be contrary to the public interest because immediate 
action is needed to ensure the safety of life on Lake Havasu.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 
70041 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1236). The Captain of the Port Sector San 
Diego (COTP) has determined that a large congregation of vessels in 
Thompson Bay associated with the Havapalooza 2019 marine event on 
September 14, 2019, poses a potential safety concern. This rule is 
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the 
navigable waters within Thompson Bay while the event is occurring.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary special local regulation from 10 
a.m. to 8 p.m. on September 14, 2019. This special local regulation 
establishes a spectator area covering all navigable waters of Thompson 
Bay shoreward of a line connected by the following points: Beginning at 
34[deg]27'55'' N, 114[deg]20'48'' W (Point A); thence running southerly 
to 34[deg]27'52'' N, 114[deg]20'49'' W (Point B); thence running 
southeasterly to 34[deg]27'49'' N, 114[deg]20'47'' W (Point C); thence 
running southeasterly to 34[deg]27'45'' N, 114[deg]20'43'' W (Point D); 
thence running southeasterly to 34[deg]27'40'' N, 114[deg]20'34'' W 
(Point E) thence running southeasterly and ending at 34[deg]27'37'' N, 
114[deg]20'27'' W (Point F). The duration of the regulated area is 
intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters 
before, during, and after the scheduled marine event. All non-event 
participants would be permitted to enter the regulated area without 
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.

[[Page 46683]]

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the regulated area. Vessel 
traffic can safely transit around this regulated which would impact a 
an approximately 17,000 square yard area of Thompson Bay from 8 a.m. to 
10 p.m. Moreover, the Coast Guard would make a post in the Local Notice 
to Mariners with details on the regulated area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
temporary regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated 
in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), 
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have 
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves a temporary regulated area that would 
limit access to an approximately 17,000 square yard area of Thompson 
bay from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. It is categorically excluded from further 
review under paragraph L61 in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard 
Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures. A Record of 
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so 
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON THE NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.


0
2. Add Sec.  100.1102T11-0568 to read as follows


Sec.  100.1102T11-0568  Special Local Regulation; Lake Havasu City, AZ

    (a) Location: The following area is a special local regulation: all 
navigable waters of Thompson Bay shoreward of

[[Page 46684]]

a line connected by the following points: Beginning at 34[deg]27'55'' 
N, 114[deg]20'48'' W (Point A); thence running southerly to 
34[deg]27'52'' N, 114[deg]20'49'' W (Point B); thence running 
southeasterly to 34[deg]27'49'' N, 114[deg]20'47'' W (Point C); thence 
running southeasterly to 34[deg]27'45'' N, 114[deg]20'43'' W (Point D); 
thence running southeasterly to 34[deg]27'40'' N, 114[deg]20'34'' W 
(Point E) thence running southeasterly and ending at 34[deg]27'37'' N, 
114[deg]20'27'' W (Point F).
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 10 a.m. to 8 
p.m. on September 14, 2019.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  100.35 of this part, entry into or remaining within this 
regulated area is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Sector San Diego (COTP) or a designated representative.
    (2) Vessels requiring entry into this regulated area must request 
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be 
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 69 or by telephone at 562-447-0940.
    (3) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this area must transit 
at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions 
issued by the COTP or the designated representative.
    (d) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative 
will inform the public of the enforcement times and date for this 
regulated area through Local Notice to Mariners.

    Dated: August 21, 2019.
D.P. Montoro,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate, Captain of the Port Sector San 
Diego.
[FR Doc. 2019-19119 Filed 9-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.