Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department, 44701-44703 [2019-18336]
Download as PDF
44701
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 28, 2019.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental
regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Subpart DD—Nevada
2. In § 52.1470(e), the table is
amended by adding an entry for
‘‘Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets in Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark
County, Nevada (October 2018)’’ after
the entry for ‘‘Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan, Clark
County, Nevada (March 2011)’’ to read
as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 15, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
§ 52.1470
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
State
submittal
date
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
EPA approval
date
Explanation
Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada 1
*
*
Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark County, Nevada (October 2018).
*
*
*
Clark County, Nevada: That portion of Clark County that lies in
hydrogeographic areas 164A,
164B, 165, 166, 167, 212, 213,
214, 216, 217, and 218, but excluding the Moapa River Indian
Reservation and the Fort Mohave Indian Reservation.
*
*
10/31/18
*
[INSERT Federal Register
CITATION], 8/
27/2019.
*
*
*
Conditional approval of revised
emission inventory and budgets.
Includes a State commitment to
revise the budgets within one
year.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
organization of this table generally follows from the organization of the State of Nevada’s original 1972 SIP, which was divided into 12
sections. Nonattainment and maintenance plans, among other types of plans, are listed under Section 5 (Control Strategy). Lead SIPs and Small
Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance SIPs are listed after Section 12 followed by nonregulatory or
quasi-regulatory statutory provisions approved into the SIP. Regulatory statutory provisions are listed in 40 CFR 52.1470(c).
1 The
■
3. Add § 52.1475 to read as follows:
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
§ 52.1475 Identification of plan—
conditional approval.
(a) The EPA is conditionally
approving the SIP revision titled
‘‘Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets in Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark
County, Nevada (October 2018).’’ The
conditional approval is based on a
commitment from the Clark County
Department of Air Quality (DAQ) in a
letter dated June 14, 2019, and a
commitment from the Nevada Division
of Environmental Protection (NDEP)
dated June 21, 2019, to submit certain
revised motor vehicle emissions budgets
as a SIP revision to the EPA within one
year of the effective date of the final
conditional approval. If the Clark
County DAQ or NDEP fail to meet their
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
commitments within one year of the
effective date of the final conditional
approval, the conditional approval is
treated as a disapproval.
(b) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2019–18335 Filed 8–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0105; FRL–9998–76–
Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
(MCAQD) portion of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from
graphic arts and from coating of wood
furniture and fixtures. We are approving
local rules that regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on
September 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0105. All
documents in the docket are listed on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
44702
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
section for
additional availability information.
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
Local agency
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Nicole Law or Robert Schwartz, EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947–4126 or
(415) 972–3286, law.nicole@epa.gov or
schwartz.robert@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one comment.
This comment generally expressed
support for the EPA’s proposed action.
The commenter also stated that ‘‘the
exception in the SIP to exempt Indian
reservation land and areas where the
EPA does not have jurisdiction is a
concern.’’
We understand the comment to refer
to the EPA’s discussion of Executive
Order 13175, specifically, the EPA’s
statement that ‘‘the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction.’’ The EPA
typically uses such statements in
actions regarding state SIP submittals to
explain the non-applicability of the SIP
on tribal lands. The State of Arizona
submitted the rules in this action to
apply only on lands where the State and
relevant local agency have jurisdiction.
The commenter’s concerns regarding the
inapplicability of the SIP in areas where
the EPA or an Indian tribe has
jurisdiction does not bear upon whether
the rules that are the subject of our
action meet the applicable requirements
for approval of a SIP submission.
Therefore, we do not find that the
comment provides a basis for the EPA
to change its assessment of the
submitted rules or our proposal to
approve them.
Jkt 247001
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On June 10, 2019 (84 FR 26804), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
rules into the Arizona SIP.
Rule title
337
342
We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they
comply with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules
and our evaluation.
17:38 Aug 26, 2019
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rule No.
MCAQD ........................................
MCAQD ........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
INFORMATION CONTACT
Graphic Arts ......................................................................
Coating Wood Furniture and Fixtures ..............................
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving these rules into the Arizona
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
MCAQD rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. Therefore, these materials have
been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of this final
rulemaking, and will be incorporated by
reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation.1 The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
1 62
PO 00000
Amended
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
08/17/2011
11/02/2016
Submitted
01/15/2014
06/22/2017
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
44703
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 28, 2019.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 14, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. Section 52.120 is amended in
paragraph (c), Table 4, under the table
headings ‘‘Post-July 1988 Rule
Codification’’ and ‘‘Regulation III—
Control of Air Contaminants,’’ by
revising the entries for ‘‘Rule 337’’ and
‘‘Rule 342’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 4—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS
County citation
Title/subject
*
*
State effective date
*
Additional
explanation
EPA approval date
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Post-July 1988 Rule Codification
*
*
*
*
Regulation III—Control of Air Contaminants
*
Rule 337 ...............
*
*
Graphic Arts .............................
*
August 17, 2011 .........
*
August 27, 2019, [INSERT
Federal Register CITATION].
*
*
Submitted on January 15,
2014.
*
Rule 342 ...............
*
*
Coating Wood Furniture and
Fixtures.
*
November 2, 2016 .....
*
August 27, 2019 [INSERT
Federal Register CITATION].
*
*
Submitted on June 22, 2017.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–18336 Filed 8–26–19; 8:45 am]
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0526; FRL–9998–22]
Sedaxane; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
This regulation establishes a
tolerance for residues of sedaxane in or
on legume vegetables (dried or
succulent), crop group 6. Syngenta Crop
Protection, LLC requested this tolerance
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
SUMMARY:
This regulation is effective
August 27, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 28, 2019, and must
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44701-44703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18336]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0105; FRL-9998-76-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality
Department
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the Maricopa County Air Quality
Department (MCAQD) portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern emissions of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) from graphic arts and from coating of wood furniture and
fixtures. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on September 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0105. All documents in the docket are
listed on
[[Page 44702]]
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law or Robert Schwartz, EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 947-4126
or (415) 972-3286, [email protected] or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On June 10, 2019 (84 FR 26804), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the Arizona SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD.................................... 337 Graphic Arts......... 08/17/2011 01/15/2014
MCAQD.................................... 342 Coating Wood 11/02/2016 06/22/2017
Furniture and
Fixtures.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains
more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one comment. This comment generally
expressed support for the EPA's proposed action. The commenter also
stated that ``the exception in the SIP to exempt Indian reservation
land and areas where the EPA does not have jurisdiction is a concern.''
We understand the comment to refer to the EPA's discussion of
Executive Order 13175, specifically, the EPA's statement that ``the SIP
is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other
area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction.'' The EPA typically uses such statements in actions
regarding state SIP submittals to explain the non-applicability of the
SIP on tribal lands. The State of Arizona submitted the rules in this
action to apply only on lands where the State and relevant local agency
have jurisdiction. The commenter's concerns regarding the
inapplicability of the SIP in areas where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has jurisdiction does not bear upon whether the rules that are the
subject of our action meet the applicable requirements for approval of
a SIP submission. Therefore, we do not find that the comment provides a
basis for the EPA to change its assessment of the submitted rules or
our proposal to approve them.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules
into the Arizona SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the MCAQD
rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below.
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that
plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the
CAA as of the effective date of this final rulemaking, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as
[[Page 44703]]
appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 28, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 14, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. Section 52.120 is amended in paragraph (c), Table 4, under the table
headings ``Post-July 1988 Rule Codification'' and ``Regulation III--
Control of Air Contaminants,'' by revising the entries for ``Rule 337''
and ``Rule 342'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 4--EPA-Approved Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
County citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post-July 1988 Rule Codification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation III--Control of Air Contaminants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Rule 337................ Graphic Arts..... August 17, 2011.............. August 27, 2019, Submitted on
[INSERT Federal January 15,
Register 2014.
CITATION].
* * * * * * *
Rule 342................ Coating Wood November 2, 2016............. August 27, 2019 Submitted on June
Furniture and [INSERT Federal 22, 2017.
Fixtures. Register
CITATION].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-18336 Filed 8-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P