Air Plan Approval; Nevada; Revisions to Clark County Ozone Maintenance Plan, 44699-44701 [2019-18335]
Download as PDF
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
including Des Plaines River, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River,
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal and South Branch of the Chicago
River between mile marker 319 and mile
marker 322 from 7 a.m. through 2 p.m.
on October 27, 2019. This action is
necessary and intended to protect the
safety of life and property on navigable
waters prior to, during, and immediately
after the Race4Row rowing event.
During the enforcement period listed
below, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a
designated representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.930 will be enforced from 7 a.m.
through 2 p.m. on October 27, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email LT Tiziana
Garner, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, at
630–986–2155, email address D09-DGMSUChicago-Waterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce a segment of the
Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, CalumetSaganashkee Channel, Chicago, IL,
listed in 33 CFR 165.930. Specifically,
the Coast Guard will enforce this safety
zone on all waters of the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal and South
Branch of the Chicago River between
mile marker 319 and mile marker 322.
Enforcement will occur from 7 a.m.
through 2 p.m. on October 27, 2019.
During the enforcement period, no
vessel may transit this regulated area
without approval from the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or a designated
representative. Vessels and persons
granted permission to enter the safety
zone shall obey all lawful orders or
directions of the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan, or an on-scene
representative.
This notice of enforcement is issued
under the authority of 33 CFR 165.930
and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this
publication in the Federal Register, the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will
also provide notice through other
means, which will include Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to
Mariners, distribution in leaflet form,
and on-scene oral notice. Additionally,
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
may notify representatives from the
maritime industry through telephonic
and email notifications. If the Captain of
the Port or a designated representative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
determines that the regulated area need
not be enforced for the full duration
stated in this notice, he or she may use
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant
general permission to enter the
regulated area. The Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
Channel 16 or at (414) 747–7182.
Dated: August 21, 2019.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2019–18281 Filed 8–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0365; FRL–9998–83–
Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Nevada; Revisions
to Clark County Ozone Maintenance
Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
conditionally approve a revision to the
State of Nevada’s state implementation
plan (SIP) for Clark County. The
revision consists of an update to certain
elements of the maintenance plan for
the Clark County air quality planning
area for the 1997 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS),
including the emissions inventories,
maintenance demonstration, and motor
vehicle emissions budgets. The EPA is
conditionally approving the SIP revision
because the SIP it continues to provide
for maintenance of the 1997 ozone
NAAQS; upon fulfillment of certain
commitments, it will not interfere with
attainment or reasonable further
progress of the other NAAQS; and the
budgets meet the applicable
transportation conformity requirements.
The approval is conditional because it is
based on commitments to submit an
additional SIP revision to reduce the
safety margin allocations for the budgets
within one year of this final conditional
approval.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0365, at
https://www.regulations.gov. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44699
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karina O’Connor, Air Planning Office
(AIR–2), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. By
phone at (775) 434–8176 or by email at
oconnor.karina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA. This supplementary
information section is arranged as
follows:
Table of Contents
I. Summary of the Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Summary of the Proposed Action
On July 11, 2019 (84 FR 33035), under
section 110(k)(4) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or ‘‘Act’’), the EPA proposed to
conditionally approve a SIP revision
titled ‘‘Revision to Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets in Ozone
Redesignation Request and Maintenance
Plan: Clark County, Nevada’’ (October
2018) (herein, referred to as the ‘‘2018
Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision’’),
submitted by the Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection (NDEP) on
October 31, 2018. The 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision updates
certain elements of the maintenance
plan for Clark County for the 1997
ozone NAAQS, including the attainment
inventory, the maintenance
demonstration and the motor vehicle
emissions budgets (‘‘budgets’’). The
updated budgets replace Clark County’s
existing budgets for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS, and the previously-approved
budgets will no longer be applicable for
transportation conformity purposes on
the publication date of this final
conditional approval in the Federal
Register.1 We proposed a conditional
approval based on commitments from
NDEP and the Clark County Department
of Air Quality (DAQ) to submit a SIP
revision within one year of final
1 40
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
CFR 93.118(f)(2)(v).
27AUR1
44700
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
conditional approval.2 The purpose of
the future SIP revision is to reduce the
safety margin allocations in the budgets
to ensure that the 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision, when
revised to reduce the safety margin
allocations, will not interfere with
reasonable further progress or
attainment of the 2008 and 2015 ozone
NAAQS.
For more information on the
background for this action, including a
description of the ozone NAAQS, the
ozone area designations for Clark
County, the 2011 Ozone Maintenance
Plan and the EPA’s MOVES emissions
model, and the rationale for conditional
approval of the 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision, please see
our July 11, 2019 proposed rule.
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
II. Public Comments
The public comment period on the
proposed rule opened on July 11, 2019,
the date of its publication in the Federal
Register, and closed on August 12,
2019. During this period, the EPA
received no comments.
III. Final Action
For the reasons discussed in our July
11, 2019 proposed rule and summarized
above, the EPA is taking final action
under CAA section 110(k)(4) to
conditionally approve the 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision submitted
by NDEP on October 31, 2018, as a
revision of the Clark County portion of
the Nevada SIP. In so doing, we find
that the 2011 Ozone Maintenance Plan,
as revised by the updated attainment
inventory and maintenance
demonstration in the 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision, continues
to provide for maintenance of the 1997
ozone NAAQS, and upon fulfillment of
the commitments made by NDEP and
Clark County DAQ to reduce the safety
margin allocations for the budgets, will
not interfere with reasonable further
progress or attainment of the other
NAAQS in Clark County. In
conditionally approving the 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision, the EPA is
also finding adequate and conditionally
approving the updated oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) and volatile organic
compound (VOC) budgets for 2008,
2015, and 2022 for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS (shown in Table 1) based on
our conclusion that the updated budgets
meet the applicable transportation
conformity requirements.
2 Letter dated June 14, 2019, from Jodi Bechtel,
Assistant Director, Clark County DAQ, to Greg
Lovato, Administrator, NDEP; and letter dated June
21, 2019, from Greg Lovato, Administrator, NDEP,
to Elizabeth Adams, Director, Air Division, EPA
Region IX.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
TABLE 1—OZONE MOTOR VEHICLE
EMISSION BUDGETS
[Average summer weekday, tons per day]
2018 Ozone
maintenance plan
revision
Year
NOX
2008 ..........................
2015 ..........................
2022 ..........................
89.50
90.92
86.74
VOC
42.46
53.94
52.96
Source: 2018 Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision, Table 3–1.
The approval of the 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision is
conditional because it is based on
commitments from NDEP and the Clark
County DAQ to submit a SIP revision
within one year of final conditional
approval.3 The purpose of the future SIP
revision is to reduce the safety margin
allocations to the budgets to ensure that
the 2018 Ozone Maintenance Plan
Revision, when revised to reduce the
safety margin allocations, will not
interfere with reasonable further
progress or attainment of the 2008 and
2015 ozone NAAQS.
Lastly, the revised budgets in Table 1
replace the existing approved budgets
from the 2011 Ozone Maintenance Plan;
the Regional Transportation
Commission and the U.S. Department of
Transportation must use these revised
budgets for future transportation
conformity determinations.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
proposes to approve conditionally a
state plan as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
3 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, this rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
44701
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 28, 2019.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental
regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Subpart DD—Nevada
2. In § 52.1470(e), the table is
amended by adding an entry for
‘‘Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets in Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark
County, Nevada (October 2018)’’ after
the entry for ‘‘Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan, Clark
County, Nevada (March 2011)’’ to read
as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 15, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
§ 52.1470
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
State
submittal
date
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
EPA approval
date
Explanation
Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada 1
*
*
Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark County, Nevada (October 2018).
*
*
*
Clark County, Nevada: That portion of Clark County that lies in
hydrogeographic areas 164A,
164B, 165, 166, 167, 212, 213,
214, 216, 217, and 218, but excluding the Moapa River Indian
Reservation and the Fort Mohave Indian Reservation.
*
*
10/31/18
*
[INSERT Federal Register
CITATION], 8/
27/2019.
*
*
*
Conditional approval of revised
emission inventory and budgets.
Includes a State commitment to
revise the budgets within one
year.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
organization of this table generally follows from the organization of the State of Nevada’s original 1972 SIP, which was divided into 12
sections. Nonattainment and maintenance plans, among other types of plans, are listed under Section 5 (Control Strategy). Lead SIPs and Small
Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance SIPs are listed after Section 12 followed by nonregulatory or
quasi-regulatory statutory provisions approved into the SIP. Regulatory statutory provisions are listed in 40 CFR 52.1470(c).
1 The
■
3. Add § 52.1475 to read as follows:
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
§ 52.1475 Identification of plan—
conditional approval.
(a) The EPA is conditionally
approving the SIP revision titled
‘‘Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets in Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark
County, Nevada (October 2018).’’ The
conditional approval is based on a
commitment from the Clark County
Department of Air Quality (DAQ) in a
letter dated June 14, 2019, and a
commitment from the Nevada Division
of Environmental Protection (NDEP)
dated June 21, 2019, to submit certain
revised motor vehicle emissions budgets
as a SIP revision to the EPA within one
year of the effective date of the final
conditional approval. If the Clark
County DAQ or NDEP fail to meet their
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Aug 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
commitments within one year of the
effective date of the final conditional
approval, the conditional approval is
treated as a disapproval.
(b) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2019–18335 Filed 8–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0105; FRL–9998–76–
Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
(MCAQD) portion of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from
graphic arts and from coating of wood
furniture and fixtures. We are approving
local rules that regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on
September 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0105. All
documents in the docket are listed on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44699-44701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18335]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0365; FRL-9998-83-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Nevada; Revisions to Clark County Ozone
Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to conditionally approve a revision to the State of Nevada's
state implementation plan (SIP) for Clark County. The revision consists
of an update to certain elements of the maintenance plan for the Clark
County air quality planning area for the 1997 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), including the emissions
inventories, maintenance demonstration, and motor vehicle emissions
budgets. The EPA is conditionally approving the SIP revision because
the SIP it continues to provide for maintenance of the 1997 ozone
NAAQS; upon fulfillment of certain commitments, it will not interfere
with attainment or reasonable further progress of the other NAAQS; and
the budgets meet the applicable transportation conformity requirements.
The approval is conditional because it is based on commitments to
submit an additional SIP revision to reduce the safety margin
allocations for the budgets within one year of this final conditional
approval.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0365, at https://www.regulations.gov.
All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karina O'Connor, Air Planning Office
(AIR-2), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
By phone at (775) 434-8176 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA. This supplementary
information section is arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Summary of the Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Summary of the Proposed Action
On July 11, 2019 (84 FR 33035), under section 110(k)(4) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), the EPA proposed to conditionally
approve a SIP revision titled ``Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets in Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark
County, Nevada'' (October 2018) (herein, referred to as the ``2018
Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision''), submitted by the Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection (NDEP) on October 31, 2018. The 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision updates certain elements of the maintenance
plan for Clark County for the 1997 ozone NAAQS, including the
attainment inventory, the maintenance demonstration and the motor
vehicle emissions budgets (``budgets''). The updated budgets replace
Clark County's existing budgets for the 1997 ozone NAAQS, and the
previously-approved budgets will no longer be applicable for
transportation conformity purposes on the publication date of this
final conditional approval in the Federal Register.\1\ We proposed a
conditional approval based on commitments from NDEP and the Clark
County Department of Air Quality (DAQ) to submit a SIP revision within
one year of final
[[Page 44700]]
conditional approval.\2\ The purpose of the future SIP revision is to
reduce the safety margin allocations in the budgets to ensure that the
2018 Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision, when revised to reduce the safety
margin allocations, will not interfere with reasonable further progress
or attainment of the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 40 CFR 93.118(f)(2)(v).
\2\ Letter dated June 14, 2019, from Jodi Bechtel, Assistant
Director, Clark County DAQ, to Greg Lovato, Administrator, NDEP; and
letter dated June 21, 2019, from Greg Lovato, Administrator, NDEP,
to Elizabeth Adams, Director, Air Division, EPA Region IX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on the background for this action, including a
description of the ozone NAAQS, the ozone area designations for Clark
County, the 2011 Ozone Maintenance Plan and the EPA's MOVES emissions
model, and the rationale for conditional approval of the 2018 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision, please see our July 11, 2019 proposed rule.
II. Public Comments
The public comment period on the proposed rule opened on July 11,
2019, the date of its publication in the Federal Register, and closed
on August 12, 2019. During this period, the EPA received no comments.
III. Final Action
For the reasons discussed in our July 11, 2019 proposed rule and
summarized above, the EPA is taking final action under CAA section
110(k)(4) to conditionally approve the 2018 Ozone Maintenance Plan
Revision submitted by NDEP on October 31, 2018, as a revision of the
Clark County portion of the Nevada SIP. In so doing, we find that the
2011 Ozone Maintenance Plan, as revised by the updated attainment
inventory and maintenance demonstration in the 2018 Ozone Maintenance
Plan Revision, continues to provide for maintenance of the 1997 ozone
NAAQS, and upon fulfillment of the commitments made by NDEP and Clark
County DAQ to reduce the safety margin allocations for the budgets,
will not interfere with reasonable further progress or attainment of
the other NAAQS in Clark County. In conditionally approving the 2018
Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision, the EPA is also finding adequate and
conditionally approving the updated oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
and volatile organic compound (VOC) budgets for 2008, 2015, and 2022
for the 1997 ozone NAAQS (shown in Table 1) based on our conclusion
that the updated budgets meet the applicable transportation conformity
requirements.
Table 1--Ozone Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
[Average summer weekday, tons per day]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2018 Ozone
maintenance plan
Year revision
---------------------
NO VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008.............................................. 89.50 42.46
2015.............................................. 90.92 53.94
2022.............................................. 86.74 52.96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: 2018 Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision, Table 3-1.
The approval of the 2018 Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision is
conditional because it is based on commitments from NDEP and the Clark
County DAQ to submit a SIP revision within one year of final
conditional approval.\3\ The purpose of the future SIP revision is to
reduce the safety margin allocations to the budgets to ensure that the
2018 Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision, when revised to reduce the safety
margin allocations, will not interfere with reasonable further progress
or attainment of the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the revised budgets in Table 1 replace the existing
approved budgets from the 2011 Ozone Maintenance Plan; the Regional
Transportation Commission and the U.S. Department of Transportation
must use these revised budgets for future transportation conformity
determinations.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve conditionally a
state plan as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, this rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a
[[Page 44701]]
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 28, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 15, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD--Nevada
0
2. In Sec. 52.1470(e), the table is amended by adding an entry for
``Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark County, Nevada (October 2018)''
after the entry for ``Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan,
Clark County, Nevada (March 2011)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1470 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Nevada Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable State
Name of SIP provision geographic or submittal EPA approval date Explanation
nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Revision to Motor Vehicle Clark County, 10/31/18 [INSERT Federal Conditional
Emissions Budgets in Ozone Nevada: That Register approval of
Redesignation Request and portion of Clark CITATION], 8/27/ revised emission
Maintenance Plan: Clark County, County that lies 2019. inventory and
Nevada (October 2018). in hydrogeographic budgets. Includes
areas 164A, 164B, a State commitment
165, 166, 167, to revise the
212, 213, 214, budgets within one
216, 217, and 218, year.
but excluding the
Moapa River Indian
Reservation and
the Fort Mohave
Indian Reservation.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
\1\ The organization of this table generally follows from the organization of the State of Nevada's original
1972 SIP, which was divided into 12 sections. Nonattainment and maintenance plans, among other types of plans,
are listed under Section 5 (Control Strategy). Lead SIPs and Small Business Stationary Source Technical and
Environmental Compliance Assistance SIPs are listed after Section 12 followed by nonregulatory or quasi-
regulatory statutory provisions approved into the SIP. Regulatory statutory provisions are listed in 40 CFR
52.1470(c).
0
3. Add Sec. 52.1475 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1475 Identification of plan--conditional approval.
(a) The EPA is conditionally approving the SIP revision titled
``Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Ozone Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan: Clark County, Nevada (October 2018).''
The conditional approval is based on a commitment from the Clark County
Department of Air Quality (DAQ) in a letter dated June 14, 2019, and a
commitment from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP)
dated June 21, 2019, to submit certain revised motor vehicle emissions
budgets as a SIP revision to the EPA within one year of the effective
date of the final conditional approval. If the Clark County DAQ or NDEP
fail to meet their commitments within one year of the effective date of
the final conditional approval, the conditional approval is treated as
a disapproval.
(b) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2019-18335 Filed 8-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P