Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Niantic River, Niantic, CT, 43093-43095 [2019-17937]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(COTP) or a designated representative.
A designated representative may be a
Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The
PATCOM may be aboard either a Coast
Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
The PATCOM may be contacted on
Channel 16 VHF–FM (156.8 MHz) by
the call sign ‘‘PATCOM’’ or by calling
(314) 269–2332.
(2) All persons and vessels not
registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels are
considered spectators. The ‘‘official
patrol vessels’’ consist of any Coast
Guard, state, or local law enforcement
and sponsor provided vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP or a
designated representative to patrol the
regulated area.
(3) Spectator vessels desiring to
transit the regulated area may do so only
with prior approval of the COTP or a
designated representative and when so
directed by that officer will be operated
at a minimum safe navigation speed in
a manner which will not endanger
participants in the regulated area or any
other vessels.
(4) No spectator vessel shall anchor,
block, loiter, or impede the through
transit of participants or official patrol
vessels in the regulated area during the
effective dates and times, unless cleared
for entry by or through an official patrol
vessel.
(5) Spectator vessels may anchor
outside the regulated area, but may not
anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable
channel. Spectator vessels may be
moored to a waterfront facility within
the regulated area in such a way that
they shall not interfere with the progress
of the event. Such mooring must be
complete at least 30 minutes prior to the
establishment of the regulated area and
remain moored through the duration of
the event.
(6) The COTP or a designated
representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled
by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall
come to an immediate stop and comply
with the directions given. Failure to do
so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or
both.
(7) The COTP or a designated
representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any
time it is deemed necessary for the
protection of life or property.
(8) The COTP or a designated
representative will terminate
enforcement of the special local
regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or a designated representative will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Aug 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
inform the public of the enforcement
times and date for this regulated area
through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notice to Mariners
(BNM), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as
appropriate.
Dated: August 14, 2019.
S.A. Stoermer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2019–17875 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2019–0545]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Niantic River, Niantic, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing
to modify the operating schedule that
governs the S156 Bridge across the
Niantic River, mile 0.1 at Niantic, CT.
The bridge owner, the Connecticut
Department of Transportation,
submitted a request to allow six hours’
notice for night time transits during the
months of November and April due to
infrequent bridge openings. This
proposed rule would align the
regulations for the S156 Bridge with
other Connecticut Department of
Transportation bridges.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
October 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2019–0545 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Jeffrey Stieb, First
Coast Guard District Bridge
Management Specialist; telephone 617–
223–8364, email Jeffrey.D.Stieb@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43093
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CT DOT Connecticut Department of
Transportation
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(Advance, Supplemental)
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
The S156 Bridge at mile 0.1 over the
Niantic River at Niantic, Connecticut,
has a vertical clearance of 9 feet at mean
high water and 12 feet at mean low
water. Vertical clearance is unlimited
when the draw is open. Horizontal
clearance is approximately 65 feet.
Waterway users include recreational
and small commercial vessels.
The existing regulation, 33 CFR
117.215(b), requires that from December
1 through March 31, from 8 p.m. to 4
a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at
least six hours’ notice is given. CT DOT
has requested that the start of the winter
schedule begin one month sooner and
end one month later than presently
allowed by the regulation. This rule
change will align the winter operation
and staffing of the three CT DOT
drawbridges located in the same
operational area by extending the range
of months during which six hours’
notice is required to include November
and April. This rule change will allow
for more efficient and economic
operation of the bridge while meeting
the reasonable needs of navigation.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The bridge logs show that during the
last three years only three requests to
open occurred between 8 p.m. and 4
a.m. in November and no request to
open were received between 8 p.m. and
4 a.m. in April. None of the requests
were from commercial vessels. CT DOT
and the Coast Guard have conducted
outreach to stakeholders with no
objections received. The Coast Guard
proposes to permanently modify the
operating regulation.
The proposed rule would provide
that, from November 1 through April 30,
between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 4:00
a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at
least six hours’ notice is given. It is our
opinion that the proposed rule meets
reasonable needs of marine traffic.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
43094
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
based on these statutes and Executive
Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the fact that only three
vessel transits would have been affected
over the past three years. We believe
that this proposed change to the
drawbridge operation regulation at 33
CFR 117.215(b) will meet the reasonable
needs of navigation.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The bridge will continue to open on
signal with six hours’ notice between
the hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. during
the months of November and April.
Based on the last three years of records,
an average of one vessel annually will
be affected by the proposed change.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Aug 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of
a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review, under paragraph
L49 of Chapter 3, Table 3–1 of U.S.
Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Implementing Procedures 5090.1A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration and a Memorandum for
the Record are not required for this
proposed rule. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.215(b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 117.215
Niantic River.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The draw of the S156 Bridge, mile
0.1, at Niantic, shall open on signal;
except that, from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m., and
4 p.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays, the draw shall
open only for the passage of commercial
vessels. From November 1 through April
30, from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m., the draw shall
open on signal if at least six hours’
notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge.
Dated: July 26, 2019.
A.J. Tiongson,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019–17937 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0661]
RIN 1625–AA00
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Safety Zone, Swim Around Charleston;
Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary moving safety
zone during the Swim Around
Charleston, a swimming race occurring
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Aug 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
43095
on the Wando River, the Cooper River,
Charleston Harbor, and the Ashley
River, in Charleston, South Carolina.
The temporary moving safety zone is
necessary to protect swimmers,
participant vessels, spectators, and the
general public during the event. Persons
and vessels would be prohibited from
entering the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 19, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2019–0661 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Chad Ray, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
Chad.L.Ray@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the Wando River, Cooper River,
Charleston Harbor, and Ashley River, in
Charleston, South Carolina during Swim
Around Charleston from 8:00 a.m. to
2:45 p.m. on October 6, 2019.
Approximately 50 swimmers are
anticipated to participate in the race.
Persons and vessels desiring to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area may contact
the COTP by telephone at (843) 740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted, all
persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the
instructions of the COTP or a designated
representative. The COTP will provide
notice of the safety zone by Local Notice
to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives. The regulatory text we
are proposing appears at the end of this
document.
I. Table of Abbreviations
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on: (1) Non-participant persons
and vessels may enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area during the enforcement
periods if authorized by Sector
Charleston COTP or a designated
representative; (2) vessels not able to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area
without authorization from Sector
Charleston COTP or a designated
representative may operate in the
surrounding areas during the
enforcement period; (3) the Coast Guard
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On July 24, 2019, Kathleen Wilson
notified the Coast Guard that she will be
sponsoring the Swim Around
Charleston occurring October 6, 2019.
The race will impact waters of the
Wando River, Cooper River, Charleston
Harbor, and Ashley River, in Charleston,
South Carolina. The Captain of the Port
Charleston (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the
event would be a safety concern for race
participants, spectators, and others on
the navigable waters around the event.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of persons, vessels,
and the marine environment before,
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
temporary safety zone on the waters of
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 20, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43093-43095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17937]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2019-0545]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Niantic River, Niantic, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to modify the operating schedule
that governs the S156 Bridge across the Niantic River, mile 0.1 at
Niantic, CT. The bridge owner, the Connecticut Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to allow six hours' notice for
night time transits during the months of November and April due to
infrequent bridge openings. This proposed rule would align the
regulations for the S156 Bridge with other Connecticut Department of
Transportation bridges.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before October 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0545 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Jeffrey Stieb, First Coast Guard District
Bridge Management Specialist; telephone 617-223-8364, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CT DOT Connecticut Department of Transportation
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
The S156 Bridge at mile 0.1 over the Niantic River at Niantic,
Connecticut, has a vertical clearance of 9 feet at mean high water and
12 feet at mean low water. Vertical clearance is unlimited when the
draw is open. Horizontal clearance is approximately 65 feet. Waterway
users include recreational and small commercial vessels.
The existing regulation, 33 CFR 117.215(b), requires that from
December 1 through March 31, from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. the draw shall open
on signal if at least six hours' notice is given. CT DOT has requested
that the start of the winter schedule begin one month sooner and end
one month later than presently allowed by the regulation. This rule
change will align the winter operation and staffing of the three CT DOT
drawbridges located in the same operational area by extending the range
of months during which six hours' notice is required to include
November and April. This rule change will allow for more efficient and
economic operation of the bridge while meeting the reasonable needs of
navigation.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The bridge logs show that during the last three years only three
requests to open occurred between 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. in November and no
request to open were received between 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. in April. None
of the requests were from commercial vessels. CT DOT and the Coast
Guard have conducted outreach to stakeholders with no objections
received. The Coast Guard proposes to permanently modify the operating
regulation.
The proposed rule would provide that, from November 1 through April
30, between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m., the draw shall open
on signal if at least six hours' notice is given. It is our opinion
that the proposed rule meets reasonable needs of marine traffic.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses
[[Page 43094]]
based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that only
three vessel transits would have been affected over the past three
years. We believe that this proposed change to the drawbridge operation
regulation at 33 CFR 117.215(b) will meet the reasonable needs of
navigation.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The bridge will continue to open on signal with six hours' notice
between the hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. during the months of November
and April. Based on the last three years of records, an average of one
vessel annually will be affected by the proposed change.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action
is one of a category of actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
proposed rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review, under paragraph L49 of Chapter 3, Table
3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures
5090.1A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a
Memorandum for the Record are not required for this proposed rule. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
[[Page 43095]]
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.215(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.215 Niantic River.
* * * * *
(b) The draw of the S156 Bridge, mile 0.1, at Niantic, shall open
on signal; except that, from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m., and 4 p.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays, the draw shall open only for
the passage of commercial vessels. From November 1 through April 30,
from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least six
hours' notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
Dated: July 26, 2019.
A.J. Tiongson,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-17937 Filed 8-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P