Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Adult Protective Services Client Outcome Study, 43137-43139 [2019-17879]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43137
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Notices
Health and Human Services (HHS), is
proposing to collect data on the
condition and ownership of American
Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN)
facilities to meet congressional reporting
requirements under the Head Start Act.
DATES: Comments due within 30 days of
publication. OMB is required to make a
decision concerning the collection of
information between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,149,174.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9836A.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–17870 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
American Indian and Alaska Native
(AIAN) Facility Survey (New Collection)
The Office of Head Start;
Administration for Children and
Families; HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office Head Start (OHS),
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), U.S. Department of
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Email: OIRA_
SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV, Attn:
Desk Officer for the Administration for
Children and Families.
Copies of the proposed collection may
be obtained by emailing infocollection@
ADDRESSES:
acf.hhs.gov. Alternatively, copies can
also be obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE
Reports Clearance Officer. All requests,
emailed or written, should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The Head Start Act at
Sec. 650(b) requires the submission of a
report to the Committee on Education
and Labor of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
of the Senate concerning the condition,
location, and ownership of facilities
used by AIAN grantees. This report is
required once during every 5-year
period. The proposed collection is a
brief survey on the condition and
ownership of AIAN facilities for the
purpose of this report.
Respondents: AIAN Head Start
grantees
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Total number
of respondents
Instrument
AIAN Facility Survey ........................................................................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 54.25.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9846.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–17871 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
Administration for Community
Living, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Administration for
Community Living (ACL) is announcing
an opportunity for the public to
comment on the proposed collection of
information listed above. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
Jkt 247001
Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to: Stephanie Whittier
Eliason. Submit written comments on
the collection of information to
Administration for Community Living,
Washington, DC 20201, Attention:
Stephanie Whittier Eliason.
ADDRESSES:
AGENCY:
20:49 Aug 19, 2019
publish a notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice.
This notice solicits comments on the
Proposed new information collection
and solicits comments on the
information collection requirements
related to the ‘‘Adult Protective Services
Client Outcome Study’’.
Comments on the collection of
information must be submitted
electronically by 11:59 p.m. (EST) or
postmarked by October 21, 2019.
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Adult Protective
Services Client Outcome Study
VerDate Sep<11>2014
155
DATES:
[OMB#0985–XXXX]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Whittier Eliason,
Administration for Community Living,
Washington, DC 20201, (202) 795–7467,
Stephanie.WhittierEliason@acl.hhs.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total number
of responses
per
respondent
3.5
Average
burden hours
per response
Total burden
hours
.1
54.25
Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, ACL is publishing a notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, ACL invites
comments on our burden estimates or
any other aspect of this collection of
information, including:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
43138
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
proper performance of ACL’s functions,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of ACL’s estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used
to determine burden estimates;
(3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Description: The Administration for
Community Living (ACL) in the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is seeking OMB
approval to collect data using new
information collection tools that
examine if and how APS programs make
a difference in the lives of APS clients.
APS programs are provided by state and
local governments nationwide and serve
older adults and adults with disabilities
in need of assistance due to
maltreatment, which can include:
Physical, emotional, and sexual abuse;
financial exploitation; neglect; and selfneglect. APS is an important avenue
through which maltreatment is reported
to law enforcement or other agencies.
Additionally, APS programs are often
the gateway for adults who experience
maltreatment to access additional
community, social, health, behavioral
health, and legal services to maintain
independence in the settings in which
they prefer to live. APS programs work
closely with clients and a wide variety
of allied professionals to maximize
safety and independence, while
respecting each client’s right to selfdetermination. At this time, there is no
single funding stream for APS nor a
single set of rules and regulations that
APS programs must follow. Building the
evidence-base for APS programs and
practices, promoting the use of
evidence-based and promising practices,
and developing guiding standards are
key needs for the APS field. The
proposed new data collection is an
important component for building the
evidence-base for APS programs and
practices in improving client outcomes.
Specifically, the data collection will
help examine (1) what changes clients
report as a result of receiving APS
services; (2) how satisfied clients are
with the APS services they receive; (3)
to what extent clients report APS helps
them achieve their goals; (4) to what
extent clients report APS supports their
right to self-determination; (5) to what
extent APS programs affect client safety
(risk of maltreatment); (6) how APS
program intervene to reduce client risk
of maltreatment; (7) what factors help or
hinder APS efforts to reduce risk of
maltreatment; (8) to what extent APS
programs affect client well-being (e.g.,
quality of life, financial, physical health,
etc.); (9) how APS programs intervene to
improve client-well-being; and (10)
what factors help or hinder APS efforts
to improve client well-being. The data
collection will be conducted with three
target populations: (1) APS clients, (2)
APS caseworkers, and (3) APS leaders.
APS leaders will consist of APS state
and APS county leaders.
Data collection with these three target
populations will include: A brief,
anonymous APS client questionnaire,
including a de-identified client data
form; a semi-structured in-person
interview with APS clients; a semistructured in-person focus group with
APS caseworkers; and a semi-structured
interview with APS leaders.
The APS client questionnaire is
designed to be as brief as possible, while
examining key client outcome areas,
identified in collaboration with a
national expert panel consisting of
federal experts, researchers,
practitioners, and program leaders in
APS. The outcomes areas focus on:
Satisfaction with APS, safety, and wellbeing, and will be assessed with nine
questions. The question statements
examining these areas are designed to be
short and easy to understand. The first
item on the questionnaire provides a
simple ‘‘yes/no’’ response option. For
the remaining questions, APS clients or
a proxy (respondents) are asked to rate
the extent which they agree with each
statement using a Likert-type rating
scale ranging from ‘strongly disagree’ to
‘strongly agree’. Respondents also have
the option of sharing anything else
about their experience with APS
through an open-ended question at the
end of the form. The questionnaire will
be hand-delivered to the client or proxy
respondent by the APS caseworker at
case closure. The respondent will
Number of
respondents
Respondent/data collection activity
Client Questionnaire ........................................................................................
Client Data Form .............................................................................................
Client Interview ................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Aug 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complete the questionnaire and mail it
back to the research team by using a
prepaid return envelope.
The client data form will be linked to
the client questionnaire using a prepopulated eight-digit form number. The
client data form is designed to capture
de-identified, basic demographic
information and additional details about
APS clients and their cases.
These data points are expected to be
among the information about clients,
and their cases, that caseworkers
already collect during normal APS
processes. The form does not collect any
personally identifiable information. The
form will be completed online by APS
caseworkers. If an APS program prefers
another method of completing the form,
hard copies can be provided and mailed
back to the research team using a
prepaid return envelope.
Individual interviews with APS
clients are designed to gain more indepth knowledge about the experiences
and needs of APS clients along the key
outcome areas assessed in the
questionnaire. A standardized, semistructured interview guide will be used
to guide the interviews with clients who
provide informed consent. Focus groups
with APS caseworkers will be
conducted in person, using a
standardized, semi-structured focus
group guide. Individual interviews with
APS leaders will be conducted either inperson or by phone with county and
state leaders using a standardized, semistructured, interview guide. Similar to
client interviews, focus groups with
APS caseworkers and interviews with
APS leaders will focus on the identified
outcome areas. Additional questions
will be asked to gain insight into access
and availability of services,
collaboration and partnerships with
other entities in the community, and
barriers and facilitating factors that
affect APS services and client outcomes.
The interview guide for APS leaders
also contains questions related to APS
polices and procedures.
The proposed data collection tools
may be found on the ACL website for
review at https://www.acl.gov/aboutacl/public-input.
Estimated Program Burden: ACL
estimates the burden associated with
this collection of information as follows:
Responses
per
respondent
6,000
6,000
24
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
Hours per
response
1
1
1
20AUN1
0.167
0.167
0.75
Annual burden
hours
1,002
1,002
18
43139
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Notices
Hours per
response
Annual burden
hours
APS Caseworker Focus Group .......................................................................
APS Leaders Interview ....................................................................................
84
16
1
1
1.5
1
126
16
Total ..........................................................................................................
12,124
........................
3.58
2,164
Dated: August 14, 2019.
Mary Lazare,
Principal Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–17879 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
Food and Drug Administration
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice; correction.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is correcting a
notice that appeared in the Federal
Register of June 8, 2011. The document
announced the withdrawal of approval
of 70 new drug applications (NDAs) and
97 abbreviated new drug applications
from multiple applicants, effective July
8, 2011. The document contained the
incorrect applicant information for NDA
018380. The correct applicant for NDA
018380 is Hospira, Inc. This document
corrects that error.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Florine Purdie, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6248,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–3601.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of Wednesday, June 8,
2011 (76 FR 33310), appearing on page
33310 in FR Doc. 2011–14164, the
following correction is made:
On page 33311, in table 1, in the
‘‘Applicant’’ column for NDA 018380,
correct the entry ‘‘Do.’’ to read ‘‘Hospira,
Inc., 275 North Field Dr., Bldg. H2, Lake
Forest, IL 60045–5046.’’
Dated: August 14, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–17933 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
20:49 Aug 19, 2019
Electronic Submissions
Jkt 247001
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al.;
Withdrawal of Approval of 70 New
Drug Applications and 97 Abbreviated
New Drug Applications; Correction
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Food and Drug Administration
AGENCY:
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0411]
ACTION:
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
Fit for Use Pilot Program Invitation for
the Clinical Data Interchange
Standards Consortium for Standard for
Exchange of Nonclinical Data
Implementation Guide: Version 3.1
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. FDA–2019–N–3500]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Responses
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Respondent/data collection activity
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing that it intends to conduct a
Fit for Use (FFU) pilot program to test
the processing and analysis of
nonclinical study data provided
electronically for the Clinical Data
Interchange Standards Consortium
(CDISC) for Standard for Exchange of
Nonclinical Data (SEND)
Implementation Guide (IG): Version 3.1
(SEND 3.1). The Agency’s Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
will test the processing and analysis of
nonclinical study data provided
electronically in SEND 3.1 format. FDA
is inviting individual firms that wish to
participate in this pilot program to
submit participation requests via email
or in writing.
DATES: To be considered for
participation in the pilot program,
submit electronic or written requests by
September 19, 2019. See the ADDRESSES
section for participation request
instructions.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic requests
to participate in the pilot and comments
regarding this pilot project to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
requests to participate in the pilot and
comments regarding the pilot to Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
by September 19, 2019. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked, and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2019–N–3500 for ‘‘Fit for Use Pilot
Program Invitation for the Clinical Data
Interchange Standards Consortium for
Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical
Data Implementation Guide: Version
3.1.’’ Received comments, those filed in
a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43137-43139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17879]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
[OMB#0985-XXXX]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Adult Protective Services Client Outcome Study
AGENCY: Administration for Community Living, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is announcing an
opportunity for the public to comment on the proposed collection of
information listed above. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish a notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice.
This notice solicits comments on the Proposed new information
collection and solicits comments on the information collection
requirements related to the ``Adult Protective Services Client Outcome
Study''.
DATES: Comments on the collection of information must be submitted
electronically by 11:59 p.m. (EST) or postmarked by October 21, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to: Stephanie Whittier Eliason. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to Administration for Community Living,
Washington, DC 20201, Attention: Stephanie Whittier Eliason.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Whittier Eliason,
Administration for Community Living, Washington, DC 20201, (202) 795-
7467, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, ACL is publishing a notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, ACL
invites comments on our burden estimates or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the
[[Page 43138]]
proper performance of ACL's functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of ACL's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used to determine burden estimates;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques when appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Description: The Administration for Community Living (ACL) in the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is seeking OMB
approval to collect data using new information collection tools that
examine if and how APS programs make a difference in the lives of APS
clients. APS programs are provided by state and local governments
nationwide and serve older adults and adults with disabilities in need
of assistance due to maltreatment, which can include: Physical,
emotional, and sexual abuse; financial exploitation; neglect; and self-
neglect. APS is an important avenue through which maltreatment is
reported to law enforcement or other agencies.
Additionally, APS programs are often the gateway for adults who
experience maltreatment to access additional community, social, health,
behavioral health, and legal services to maintain independence in the
settings in which they prefer to live. APS programs work closely with
clients and a wide variety of allied professionals to maximize safety
and independence, while respecting each client's right to self-
determination. At this time, there is no single funding stream for APS
nor a single set of rules and regulations that APS programs must
follow. Building the evidence-base for APS programs and practices,
promoting the use of evidence-based and promising practices, and
developing guiding standards are key needs for the APS field. The
proposed new data collection is an important component for building the
evidence-base for APS programs and practices in improving client
outcomes.
Specifically, the data collection will help examine (1) what
changes clients report as a result of receiving APS services; (2) how
satisfied clients are with the APS services they receive; (3) to what
extent clients report APS helps them achieve their goals; (4) to what
extent clients report APS supports their right to self-determination;
(5) to what extent APS programs affect client safety (risk of
maltreatment); (6) how APS program intervene to reduce client risk of
maltreatment; (7) what factors help or hinder APS efforts to reduce
risk of maltreatment; (8) to what extent APS programs affect client
well-being (e.g., quality of life, financial, physical health, etc.);
(9) how APS programs intervene to improve client-well-being; and (10)
what factors help or hinder APS efforts to improve client well-being.
The data collection will be conducted with three target populations:
(1) APS clients, (2) APS caseworkers, and (3) APS leaders. APS leaders
will consist of APS state and APS county leaders.
Data collection with these three target populations will include: A
brief, anonymous APS client questionnaire, including a de-identified
client data form; a semi-structured in-person interview with APS
clients; a semi-structured in-person focus group with APS caseworkers;
and a semi-structured interview with APS leaders.
The APS client questionnaire is designed to be as brief as
possible, while examining key client outcome areas, identified in
collaboration with a national expert panel consisting of federal
experts, researchers, practitioners, and program leaders in APS. The
outcomes areas focus on: Satisfaction with APS, safety, and well-being,
and will be assessed with nine questions. The question statements
examining these areas are designed to be short and easy to understand.
The first item on the questionnaire provides a simple ``yes/no''
response option. For the remaining questions, APS clients or a proxy
(respondents) are asked to rate the extent which they agree with each
statement using a Likert-type rating scale ranging from `strongly
disagree' to `strongly agree'. Respondents also have the option of
sharing anything else about their experience with APS through an open-
ended question at the end of the form. The questionnaire will be hand-
delivered to the client or proxy respondent by the APS caseworker at
case closure. The respondent will complete the questionnaire and mail
it back to the research team by using a prepaid return envelope.
The client data form will be linked to the client questionnaire
using a pre-populated eight-digit form number. The client data form is
designed to capture de-identified, basic demographic information and
additional details about APS clients and their cases.
These data points are expected to be among the information about
clients, and their cases, that caseworkers already collect during
normal APS processes. The form does not collect any personally
identifiable information. The form will be completed online by APS
caseworkers. If an APS program prefers another method of completing the
form, hard copies can be provided and mailed back to the research team
using a prepaid return envelope.
Individual interviews with APS clients are designed to gain more
in-depth knowledge about the experiences and needs of APS clients along
the key outcome areas assessed in the questionnaire. A standardized,
semi-structured interview guide will be used to guide the interviews
with clients who provide informed consent. Focus groups with APS
caseworkers will be conducted in person, using a standardized, semi-
structured focus group guide. Individual interviews with APS leaders
will be conducted either in-person or by phone with county and state
leaders using a standardized, semi-structured, interview guide. Similar
to client interviews, focus groups with APS caseworkers and interviews
with APS leaders will focus on the identified outcome areas. Additional
questions will be asked to gain insight into access and availability of
services, collaboration and partnerships with other entities in the
community, and barriers and facilitating factors that affect APS
services and client outcomes. The interview guide for APS leaders also
contains questions related to APS polices and procedures.
The proposed data collection tools may be found on the ACL website
for review at https://www.acl.gov/about-acl/public-input.
Estimated Program Burden: ACL estimates the burden associated with
this collection of information as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses per Hours per Annual burden
Respondent/data collection activity respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Client Questionnaire............................ 6,000 1 0.167 1,002
Client Data Form................................ 6,000 1 0.167 1,002
Client Interview................................ 24 1 0.75 18
[[Page 43139]]
APS Caseworker Focus Group...................... 84 1 1.5 126
APS Leaders Interview........................... 16 1 1 16
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 12,124 .............. 3.58 2,164
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: August 14, 2019.
Mary Lazare,
Principal Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-17879 Filed 8-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
