State-Based Occupational Health Surveillance; Request for Information and Meeting Notice, 42920-42921 [2019-17782]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
42920
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2019 / Notices
D Current curriculum vitae, including
complete contact information
(telephone numbers, mailing address,
and email address).
D Cover letter, including a description
of the candidate qualifications and why
the candidate would be a good fit for
ACET.
D At least one letter of
recommendation from person(s) not
employed by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
(Candidates may submit letter(s) from
current HHS employees if they wish,
but at least one letter must be submitted
by a person not employed by an HHS
agency (e.g., CDC, NIH, FDA, etc.) [see
https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/
hhs-agencies-and-offices/ for
a full list]).
Nominations may be submitted by the
candidate him- or herself, or by a
person/organization recommending the
candidate.
The Director, Strategic Business
Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, has been
delegated the authority to sign Federal
Register notices pertaining to
announcements of meetings and other
committee management activities, for
both the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit,
Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019–17691 Filed 8–16–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[Docket No. CDC–2019–0068; NIOSH–324]
State-Based Occupational Health
Surveillance; Request for Information
and Meeting Notice
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public teleconference
meeting and request for information.
AGENCY:
The National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), within the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC),
announces a public teleconference
meeting and an opportunity to comment
on funding mechanisms and other
considerations for state-based
occupational health surveillance.
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Aug 16, 2019
Jkt 247001
Comments must be received
October 18, 2019. The public
teleconference meeting will be held on
Monday, September 16, 2019, 2 p.m. to
4 p.m. EST, or after the last public
commenter in attendance has spoken,
whichever occurs first. The public
meeting will be held as a web-based
teleconference available by remote
access.
DATES:
You may submit written
comments, identified by docket
numbers CDC–2019–0068 and NIOSH–
324, by either of the following two
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH
Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue,
MS C–34, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226–1998.
Instructions: All information received
in response to this notice must include
the agency name and docket number
[CDC–2019–0068; NIOSH–324]. All
relevant comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kerry Souza, 395 E St SW, Washington,
DC 20004; phone: 202–245–0639 (not a
toll free number); email: ksouza@
cdc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Information
State health agencies have a critical
role in the identification and prevention
of occupational illnesses and injuries.
NIOSH has supported state agencies
(primarily departments of public health
and, in some cases, departments of
labor) since the 1970s, through a
combination of funding and technical
assistance.1 Since that time, NIOSH has
supported states to build capacity in
occupational safety and health, ranging
from the development of case-based
surveillance to creating focused public
health interventions addressing the
occupational health needs of higher risk
populations. The work of these state
programs exemplifies the concept of
‘‘information for action’’ by ensuring
that collection, analysis, interpretation,
and dissemination of occupational
health data are linked to prevention and
control activities. Numerous examples
of these successes can be found in the
published literature, in state reports and
1 Eligible applicants include state and other
government entities such as local, county, or tribal
health departments, henceforth referred to as
‘states.’
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on state websites, and NIOSH website
topic pages.
In 2019, NIOSH funded 26 state
occupational health surveillance
programs of varying sizes and
capacities. The portfolio of state based
activities includes 49 projects
addressing work related morbidity and
mortality, exposure reduction, or special
populations of interest.2 These states are
funded through a research cooperative
agreement mechanism. The most recent
(2014) announcement can be found at
the following web address: https://
grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/
PAR-14-275.html.
For its state-based surveillance and
intervention cooperative agreements,
NIOSH is considering switching from a
research cooperative agreement
approach to a non-research cooperative
agreement approach. CDC generally
defines public health research as an
activity that develops or contributes to
generalizable knowledge to improve
public health practice; a non-research
activity is one that is designed to
identify and control a health problem or
improve a public health program or
service.3 A non-research mechanism
could be a public health practice
cooperative agreement or another
cooperative agreement type, and may or
may not be a better fit for the scope of
activities ordinarily conducted by
occupational health programs in a
public health context.
Under the research mechanism
currently used, submissions for funding
are evaluated on the following criteria:
Significance, investigators, innovation,
approach, and environment. Under a
non-research approach, proposals
would likely be evaluated based upon
how well the proposal identifies
important occupational health burdens
in the state; approach for tracking these
concerns; relevance and potential
impact of the public health actions
proposed; and organizational capacity of
the applicant to achieve the proposal.
This exploration of funding
mechanism type presents an
opportunity for NIOSH to receive
stakeholder input and identify the best
type from a programmatic, logistic, and
administrative point of view. Exploring
this and other approaches is
recommended by the National
Academies of Science, Engineering and
Medicine in its report ‘‘A Smarter
National Surveillance System for
2 See https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/oep/
statesurv.html.
3 CDC [2010], Distinguishing Public Health
Research and Public Health Nonresearch Policy,
https://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdcpolicy-distinguishing-public-health-researchnonresearch.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2019 / Notices
Occupational Safety and Health in the
21st Century.’’ 4
To identify and assess different
options, NIOSH plans to conduct the
following activities: (1) Hold the public
teleconference announced in this notice
to receive comments regarding funding
approaches for its state based
occupational health surveillance
programs and (2) seek additional public
comments through this docket.
NIOSH is interested in comments
related to the funding mechanism as it
relates to impact on the conduct of state
agency activities, including comments
on the following questions:
1. What are the advantages and
disadvantages to the states if NIOSH
continues using research cooperative
agreements for funding of state
occupational health surveillance
programs?
2. What are the advantages and
disadvantages to the states if NIOSH
changed to using a non-research
mechanism for funding state
occupational health surveillance
programs?
3. If the non-research mechanism
would specifically prohibit the use of
any funds for research, would this have
a negative effects on state occupational
health surveillance program
development or direction? If so, please
describe.
4. Only research cooperative
agreements are covered by Certificates
of Confidentiality that protect the
confidentiality of sensitive information
collected from research subjects by our
grantees. Do states need or use these
certificates?
5. Would a non-research cooperative
agreement mechanism impact the ability
of universities acting as bonafide agents
of the states to apply and receive
funding under this mechanism? If so,
how?
6. Non-research proposals undergo
‘‘objective review,’’ which employs CDC
reviewers in place of external peer
reviewers. Scoring of applications
would likely use the criteria described
above (occupational health burdens in
the state; approach for tracking these
concerns; relevance and potential
impact of the public health actions
proposed; and organizational capacity of
the state). Are there concerns related to
these criteria or the use of objective
review?
7. It is possible that NIOSH will
continue to employ an external peer
review process for scoring of
applications. Are there concerns related
to the use of external peer review?
4 See https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24835/asmarter-national-surveillance-system-foroccupational-safety-and-health-in-the-21st-century.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Aug 16, 2019
Jkt 247001
8. Using the principles of Burden,
Need and Impact,5 the new Notice of
Funding Opportunity will focus on
surveillance activities that address the
occupational safety and health burden
of the applicant state. How will this
directive impact the applying states?
9. The 2014 cooperative agreement
(PAR–14–275) funded three
programmatic levels (fundamental,
fundamental plus, and expanded
programs) to address the varying levels
of surveillance capacity of applicant
states. Should this 3-tier funding
strategy be continued? If not, what other
strategy might be considered?
10. How does the 3-tier funding
strategy affect states’ ability to explore
emerging occupational safety and health
issues?
11. Occupational Health Indicators 6
have been a central component of the
NIOSH state based surveillance
program. What are the advantages and
disadvantages to your state program of
continuing to calculate and use the
Occupational Health Indicators?
Public Meeting
NIOSH will hold a public
teleconference meeting to solicit
comments on the future funding
mechanism of its state-based
occupational health surveillance
program. The meeting is open to the
public, limited only by the capacity of
250 connections to the web-based
conference.
Confirm your attendance to this
meeting by sending an email to ksouza@
cdc.gov by September 9, 2019. An email
confirming registration will be sent from
NIOSH and will include details needed
to participate.
Requests to make a statement at the
public meeting should be emailed to
ksouza@cdc.gov by September 2, 2019.
All requests to make statements should
contain the name, address, telephone
number, and relevant business
affiliations of the presenter. Presenters
will be assigned a 5-minute slot on the
agenda. Oral statements only will be
permitted—presentations of slides will
not be permitted. NIOSH will confirm
presentation requests by email, and will
provide additional instructions
regarding the presentation, including
the approximate start time for the
presentation.
If a presenter is not in attendance
when his/her presentation is scheduled
to begin, the remaining presenters will
5 See https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/programs/pps/
bni.html for more information about Burden, Need
and Impact.
6 See https://www.cste.org/page/OHIndicators for
more information about Occupational Health
Indicators.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42921
be heard in order. After the last
scheduled presenter is heard, those who
missed their opportunity may be
allowed to present, limited by time
available.
Attendees who wish to speak, but did
not submit a request for the opportunity
to make a presentation, may be given
this opportunity after the scheduled
presenters are heard, at the discretion of
the presiding official and limited by
time available. Those who do not have
an opportunity to comment during the
teleconference are encouraged to submit
written comments to the NIOSH docket.
The public meeting will be recorded,
transcribed, and posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Frank J. Hearl,
Chief of Staff, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Department
of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2019–17782 Filed 8–16–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[Document Identifier: CMS–2567]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing
an opportunity for the public to
comment on CMS’ intention to collect
information from the public. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information (including each proposed
extension or reinstatement of an existing
collection of information) and to allow
60 days for public comment on the
proposed action. Interested persons are
invited to send comments regarding our
burden estimates or any other aspect of
this collection of information, including
the necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions,
the accuracy of the estimated burden,
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected, and the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42920-42921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17782]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[Docket No. CDC-2019-0068; NIOSH-324]
State-Based Occupational Health Surveillance; Request for
Information and Meeting Notice
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public teleconference meeting and request for
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
announces a public teleconference meeting and an opportunity to comment
on funding mechanisms and other considerations for state-based
occupational health surveillance.
DATES: Comments must be received October 18, 2019. The public
teleconference meeting will be held on Monday, September 16, 2019, 2
p.m. to 4 p.m. EST, or after the last public commenter in attendance
has spoken, whichever occurs first. The public meeting will be held as
a web-based teleconference available by remote access.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments, identified by docket
numbers CDC-2019-0068 and NIOSH-324, by either of the following two
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, NIOSH Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-34, Cincinnati,
Ohio 45226-1998.
Instructions: All information received in response to this notice
must include the agency name and docket number [CDC-2019-0068; NIOSH-
324]. All relevant comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerry Souza, 395 E St SW, Washington,
DC 20004; phone: 202-245-0639 (not a toll free number); email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Information
State health agencies have a critical role in the identification
and prevention of occupational illnesses and injuries. NIOSH has
supported state agencies (primarily departments of public health and,
in some cases, departments of labor) since the 1970s, through a
combination of funding and technical assistance.\1\ Since that time,
NIOSH has supported states to build capacity in occupational safety and
health, ranging from the development of case-based surveillance to
creating focused public health interventions addressing the
occupational health needs of higher risk populations. The work of these
state programs exemplifies the concept of ``information for action'' by
ensuring that collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination
of occupational health data are linked to prevention and control
activities. Numerous examples of these successes can be found in the
published literature, in state reports and on state websites, and NIOSH
website topic pages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Eligible applicants include state and other government
entities such as local, county, or tribal health departments,
henceforth referred to as `states.'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2019, NIOSH funded 26 state occupational health surveillance
programs of varying sizes and capacities. The portfolio of state based
activities includes 49 projects addressing work related morbidity and
mortality, exposure reduction, or special populations of interest.\2\
These states are funded through a research cooperative agreement
mechanism. The most recent (2014) announcement can be found at the
following web address: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-14-275.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/oep/statesurv.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For its state-based surveillance and intervention cooperative
agreements, NIOSH is considering switching from a research cooperative
agreement approach to a non-research cooperative agreement approach.
CDC generally defines public health research as an activity that
develops or contributes to generalizable knowledge to improve public
health practice; a non-research activity is one that is designed to
identify and control a health problem or improve a public health
program or service.\3\ A non-research mechanism could be a public
health practice cooperative agreement or another cooperative agreement
type, and may or may not be a better fit for the scope of activities
ordinarily conducted by occupational health programs in a public health
context.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ CDC [2010], Distinguishing Public Health Research and Public
Health Nonresearch Policy, https://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policy-distinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the research mechanism currently used, submissions for
funding are evaluated on the following criteria: Significance,
investigators, innovation, approach, and environment. Under a non-
research approach, proposals would likely be evaluated based upon how
well the proposal identifies important occupational health burdens in
the state; approach for tracking these concerns; relevance and
potential impact of the public health actions proposed; and
organizational capacity of the applicant to achieve the proposal.
This exploration of funding mechanism type presents an opportunity
for NIOSH to receive stakeholder input and identify the best type from
a programmatic, logistic, and administrative point of view. Exploring
this and other approaches is recommended by the National Academies of
Science, Engineering and Medicine in its report ``A Smarter National
Surveillance System for
[[Page 42921]]
Occupational Safety and Health in the 21st Century.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24835/a-smarter-national-surveillance-system-for-occupational-safety-and-health-in-the-21st-century.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To identify and assess different options, NIOSH plans to conduct
the following activities: (1) Hold the public teleconference announced
in this notice to receive comments regarding funding approaches for its
state based occupational health surveillance programs and (2) seek
additional public comments through this docket.
NIOSH is interested in comments related to the funding mechanism as
it relates to impact on the conduct of state agency activities,
including comments on the following questions:
1. What are the advantages and disadvantages to the states if NIOSH
continues using research cooperative agreements for funding of state
occupational health surveillance programs?
2. What are the advantages and disadvantages to the states if NIOSH
changed to using a non-research mechanism for funding state
occupational health surveillance programs?
3. If the non-research mechanism would specifically prohibit the
use of any funds for research, would this have a negative effects on
state occupational health surveillance program development or
direction? If so, please describe.
4. Only research cooperative agreements are covered by Certificates
of Confidentiality that protect the confidentiality of sensitive
information collected from research subjects by our grantees. Do states
need or use these certificates?
5. Would a non-research cooperative agreement mechanism impact the
ability of universities acting as bonafide agents of the states to
apply and receive funding under this mechanism? If so, how?
6. Non-research proposals undergo ``objective review,'' which
employs CDC reviewers in place of external peer reviewers. Scoring of
applications would likely use the criteria described above
(occupational health burdens in the state; approach for tracking these
concerns; relevance and potential impact of the public health actions
proposed; and organizational capacity of the state). Are there concerns
related to these criteria or the use of objective review?
7. It is possible that NIOSH will continue to employ an external
peer review process for scoring of applications. Are there concerns
related to the use of external peer review?
8. Using the principles of Burden, Need and Impact,\5\ the new
Notice of Funding Opportunity will focus on surveillance activities
that address the occupational safety and health burden of the applicant
state. How will this directive impact the applying states?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/programs/pps/bni.html for more
information about Burden, Need and Impact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. The 2014 cooperative agreement (PAR-14-275) funded three
programmatic levels (fundamental, fundamental plus, and expanded
programs) to address the varying levels of surveillance capacity of
applicant states. Should this 3-tier funding strategy be continued? If
not, what other strategy might be considered?
10. How does the 3-tier funding strategy affect states' ability to
explore emerging occupational safety and health issues?
11. Occupational Health Indicators \6\ have been a central
component of the NIOSH state based surveillance program. What are the
advantages and disadvantages to your state program of continuing to
calculate and use the Occupational Health Indicators?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See https://www.cste.org/page/OHIndicators for more
information about Occupational Health Indicators.
_____________________________________-
Public Meeting
NIOSH will hold a public teleconference meeting to solicit comments
on the future funding mechanism of its state-based occupational health
surveillance program. The meeting is open to the public, limited only
by the capacity of 250 connections to the web-based conference.
Confirm your attendance to this meeting by sending an email to
[email protected] by September 9, 2019. An email confirming registration
will be sent from NIOSH and will include details needed to participate.
Requests to make a statement at the public meeting should be
emailed to [email protected] by September 2, 2019. All requests to make
statements should contain the name, address, telephone number, and
relevant business affiliations of the presenter. Presenters will be
assigned a 5-minute slot on the agenda. Oral statements only will be
permitted--presentations of slides will not be permitted. NIOSH will
confirm presentation requests by email, and will provide additional
instructions regarding the presentation, including the approximate
start time for the presentation.
If a presenter is not in attendance when his/her presentation is
scheduled to begin, the remaining presenters will be heard in order.
After the last scheduled presenter is heard, those who missed their
opportunity may be allowed to present, limited by time available.
Attendees who wish to speak, but did not submit a request for the
opportunity to make a presentation, may be given this opportunity after
the scheduled presenters are heard, at the discretion of the presiding
official and limited by time available. Those who do not have an
opportunity to comment during the teleconference are encouraged to
submit written comments to the NIOSH docket.
The public meeting will be recorded, transcribed, and posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Frank J. Hearl,
Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and
Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2019-17782 Filed 8-16-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
