Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Medical CBRN Defense Consortium, 42012-42013 [2019-17601]
Download as PDF
42012
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2019 / Notices
Also, Azbil Corporation, Tokyo,
JAPAN; Bayer Business Services GmbH,
Leverkusen, GERMANY; BusinessNow,
S2014
16:10 Aug 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, CSL Behring LLC, King of
Prussia, PA; and The Gemelli University
Hospital Foundation, Rome, ITALY,
have been added as parties to this
venture.
Also, Three Lakes Partners,
Northbrook, IL, has withdrawn as a
party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and OSI intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On March 20, 2019, OSI filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on April 12, 2019 (84 FR 14973).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit,
Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2019–17607 Filed 8–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—R Consortium, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on August
6, 2019, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), R Consortium, Inc.
(‘‘R Consortium’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Avant, Inc., Chicago, IL,
has withdrawn as a party to this
venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and R Consortium
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On September 15, 2015, R Consortium
filed its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80
FR 59815).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on May 16, 2019. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 17, 2019 (84 FR 28072).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit,
Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2019–17602 Filed 8–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Medical CBRN Defense
Consortium
Notice is hereby given that, on July
24, 2019, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Medical CBRN
Defense Consortium (‘‘MCDC’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc.,
Torrance, CA; MeMed US Inc., Milpitas,
CA; New Horizon Diagnostics Corp,
Baltimore, MD; and The Geneva
Foundation, Tacoma, WA, have been
added as parties to this venture.
Also, Vaxess Technologies, Inc.,
Allston, MA, has withdrawn as a party
to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and MCDC
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On November 13, 2015, MCDC filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on January 6, 2016 (81
FR 513).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on April 24, 2019. A
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2019 / Notices
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on May 17, 2019 (84 FR 22520).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit,
Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2019–17601 Filed 8–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Peter John Ulbrich, M.D.; Decision and
Order
On March 4, 2019, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration (hereinafter,
Government), issued an Order to Show
Cause to Peter John Ulbrich, M.D.,
(hereinafter, Registrant), of Peachtree
City, Georgia. Order to Show Cause
(hereinafter, OSC), at 1. The OSC
proposes the revocation of Registrant’s
Certificate of Registration No.
FU2662523 on the ground that
Registrant does ‘‘not have authority to
handle controlled substances in Georgia,
the state in which [Registrant is]
registered with the DEA.’’ Id. (citing 21
U.S.C. 823(f) and 824(a)(3)).
Specifically, the OSC alleges that the
Georgia Composite Medical Board
(hereinafter, Board) issued an Initial
Decision indefinitely suspending
Registrant’s medical license on February
9, 2018. Id. at 1.
The OSC notified Registrant of the
right to request a hearing on the
allegations or to submit a written
statement, while waiving the right to a
hearing, the procedures for electing each
option, and the consequences for failing
to elect either option. Id. at 2 (citing 21
CFR 1301.43). The OSC also notified
Registrant of the opportunity to submit
a corrective action plan. OSC, at 2–3
(citing 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)).
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Adequacy of Service
In a Declaration dated June 24, 2019,
a Diversion Investigator (hereinafter, DI)
assigned to the Atlanta Division Office
stated that on May 7, 2019, he and
another DI met with Registrant at an
agreed location and he personally
served him with the OSC. Government’s
Request for Final Agency Action
(hereinafter, RFAA), GX 10 (Declaration
of the Diversion Investigator (hereinafter
DI’s Declaration)), at 2–3. Registrant
signed a DEA Form 12, Receipt for Cash
or Other Items, to acknowledge his
receipt of the Show Cause Order. Id. at
3; see also GX 6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Aug 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
42013
In its RFAA, the Government
represents that ‘‘more than [thirty] days
have passed since Registrant received
the [OSC]; however, Registrant has not
submitted to DEA a request for a hearing
. . . nor has he corresponded in writing
or otherwise’’ regarding a hearing.
RFAA at 2. The Government requests
the issuance of a revocation order on the
basis that ‘‘Registrant has waived his
opportunity for a hearing’’ and his
registration should be revoked pursuant
to 21 U.S.C. 802(21), 823(f) and
824(a)(3). Id. at 2.
Based on the DI’s Declaration, the
Government’s written representations,
and my review of the record, I find that
the Government accomplished service
of the OSC on Registrant on May 7,
2019. I also find that more than thirty
days have now passed since the
Government accomplished service of
the OSC. Further, based on the
Government’s written representations, I
find that neither Registrant, nor anyone
purporting to represent the Registrant,
requested a hearing, submitted a written
statement while waiving Registrant’s
right to a hearing, or submitted a
corrective action plan. Accordingly, I
find that Registrant has waived the right
to a hearing and the right to submit a
written statement and corrective action
plan. 21 CFR 1301.43(d) and 21 U.S.C.
824(c)(2)(C).
I, therefore, issue this Decision and
Order based on the record submitted by
the Government, which constitutes the
entire record before me. 21 CFR
1301.43(e).
GX 4 (Order), at 2. The Order provided
that after two years the ‘‘[Registrant]
may request his suspension be lifted
following treatment by a Boardapproved physician and advocacy from
a physician.’’ Id. The Order upheld an
Initial Decision (hereinafter, Initial
Decision) issued after a hearing by a
state administrative law judge
(hereinafter, ALJ) on February 9, 2018.
The ALJ’s Initial Decision found that,
based on unrebutted expert testimony,
‘‘[Registrant’s] history of sexual
misconduct, receipt of intensive
inpatient and outpatient treatment,
‘relapse’ behaviors, lack of transparency,
poor insight and judgment demonstrates
that, without further treatment, he
cannot practice with reasonable skill
and safety.’’ Id. at 18. Therefore, the ALJ
recommended Registrant’s ‘‘license to
practice medicine in the State of Georgia
be indefinitely suspended until
[Registrant] undergoes any treatment
ordered by the Board and it is
determined that he can practice with
reasonable skill and safety.’’ RFAA, GX
3 (Initial Decision), at 19.
According to the website of the
Georgia Composite Medical Board, of
which I take official notice, Registrant’s
license is still indefinitely suspended.
https://gcmb.mylicense.com/
verification/ (last visited August 5,
2019).1 The State of Georgia online
records show that Registrant’s medical
license remains suspended and that
Registrant is not authorized in the State
of Georgia to prescribe controlled
substances. Id.
Findings of Fact
Discussion
Registrant’s DEA Registration
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), the
Attorney General is authorized to
suspend or revoke a registration issued
under section 823 of the Controlled
Substances Act (hereinafter, CSA),
‘‘upon a finding that the registrant . . .
has had his State license or registration
suspended . . . [or] revoked . . . by
competent State authority and is no
longer authorized by State law to engage
Registrant is the holder of DEA
Certificate of Registration No.
FU2662523 at the registered address of
Cosmedical, 401 Highway 74 North,
Peachtree City, Georgia 30269. RFAA,
GX 1 (Facsimile of Registrant’s DEA
Certificate of Registration); GX 2
(Certification of Registration Status).
Pursuant to this registration, Registrant
is authorized to dispense controlled
substances in schedules II through V as
a practitioner. Id. Registrant’s
registration expires on May 31, 2020,
and is ‘‘in an active pending status.’’ GX
2 (Certification of Registration Status) at
1.
The Status of Registrant’s State License
On May 17, 2018, the Georgia
Composite Medical Board (hereinafter,
Board) issued a Final Decision and
Order (hereinafter, Order) indefinitely
suspending [Registrant’s] license to
practice medicine in the State of
Georgia, effective on that date. RFAA,
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 Under the Administrative Procedure Act, an
agency ‘‘may take official notice of facts at any stage
in a proceeding—even in the final decision.’’
United States Department of Justice, Attorney
General’s Manual on the Administrative Procedure
Act 80 (1947) (Wm. W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc., Reprint
1979). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556(e), ‘‘[w]hen an
agency decision rests on official notice of a material
fact not appearing in the evidence in the record, a
party is entitled, on timely request, to an
opportunity to show the contrary.’’ Accordingly,
Registrant may dispute my finding by filing a
properly supported motion for reconsideration
within 15 calendar days of the date of this Order.
Any such motion shall be filed with the Office of
the Administrator and a copy shall be served on the
Government. In the event Registrant files a motion,
the Government shall have 15 calendar days to file
a response.
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42012-42013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17601]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--Medical CBRN Defense Consortium
Notice is hereby given that, on July 24, 2019, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Medical CBRN Defense Consortium
(``MCDC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Intelligent Optical Systems, Inc., Torrance, CA; MeMed US
Inc., Milpitas, CA; New Horizon Diagnostics Corp, Baltimore, MD; and
The Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, WA, have been added as parties to this
venture.
Also, Vaxess Technologies, Inc., Allston, MA, has withdrawn as a
party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and MCDC intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On November 13, 2015, MCDC filed its original notification pursuant
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on
January 6, 2016 (81 FR 513).
The last notification was filed with the Department on April 24,
2019. A
[[Page 42013]]
notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b)
of the Act on May 17, 2019 (84 FR 22520).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2019-17601 Filed 8-15-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P