Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, 42025-42027 [2019-17599]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2019 / Notices
commenter thinks the NRC should
consider. The NRC will make a final
determination regarding issuance of the
NUREG after it considers any public
comments received in response to this
request.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of August, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michael C. Layton,
Director, Division of Spent Fuel Management,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2019–17584 Filed 8–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–275 and 50–323; NRC–
2019–0131]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,
Units 1 and 2
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of exemptions in response to a
December 13, 2018, request from Pacific
Gas and Electric Company (PG&E, the
licensee) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear
Power Plant (Diablo Canyon), Units 1
and 2. One exemption would allow the
licensee to use an amount of funds from
the Diablo Canyon Nuclear
Decommissioning Trust (NDT) for
decommissioning planning above the
amount limitations specified in NRC’s
regulations. Another exemption would
allow the licensee to use withdrawals
from the NDT to fund planning
activities associated with spent fuel
management and site restoration. The
NRC staff is issuing a final
environmental assessment (EA) and
final finding of no significant impact
(FONSI) associated with the proposed
exemptions.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on August
16, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2019–0131 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2019–0131. Address
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Aug 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is
available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this
document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Balwant K. Singal, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–3016,
email: Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
42025
allow the licensee to use an amount of
funds from the Diablo Canyon NDT for
decommissioning planning above the
amount limitations specified in NRC
regulations for operating reactors.
Another exemption would allow the
licensee to use withdrawals from the
NDT for planning activities associated
with spent fuel management and site
restoration. Overall, the proposed action
would allow PG&E to withdraw $187.8
million ($2017) 1 from the Diablo
Canyon NDT to fund radiological
decommissioning, spent fuel
management, and site restoration
planning activities necessary prior to
permanent cessation of operations of
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2, in 2024
and 2025, respectively. The proposed
action is in accordance with the
licensee’s application dated December
13, 2018.
II. Environmental Assessment
Need for the Proposed Action
By letter dated November 27, 2018
(ADAMS Accession No. ML18331A553),
PG&E informed the NRC of its intention
to permanently cease operation of
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2, on
November 2, 2024, and August 26, 2025,
respectively.
The requirements of 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(ii) restrict the use of NDT for
decommissioning planning for operating
reactors to three percent of the generic
minimum decommissioning amount
calculated, consistent with a formula set
forth by the regulations at 10 CFR 50.75.
Furthermore, as required by 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A), decommissioning trust
funds may be used by the licensee if the
withdrawals are for legitimate
decommissioning planning activities,
consistent with the definition of
decommissioning in 10 CFR 50.2. This
definition addresses radiological
decontamination and does not include
activities associated with irradiated fuel
management or site restoration
activities. Therefore, these regulations
would limit withdrawal from the Diablo
Canyon NDT to $37.2 million ($18.6
million per unit) and would allow
spending only on planning activities for
radiological decommissioning.
PG&E has estimated that a total of
$187.8 million ($2017) would be
required to be spent on pre-shutdown
planning activities; $148.4 million
would be for radiological
decommissioning, and $39.4 million
would be for spent fuel management
and site restoration planning activities.
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt
PG&E from the requirements of 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(ii). One exemption would
1 In its application, PG&E submitted the
decommissioning costs in 2017 dollars to be
consistent with presentation of a year-end asset
balance in the NDT. If the NRC grants the
exemptions, funds would be withdrawn from the
NDT in nominal (current) dollars.
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of
exemptions from sections
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 50.82(a)(8)(ii) of
title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) for Facility
Operating License Nos. DPR–80 and
DPR–82, issued to PG&E for operation of
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2, located
in San Luis Obispo, California. The
licensee requested the exemptions by
letter dated December 13, 2018 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18347B552) pursuant
to 10 CFR 50.12. In accordance with 10
CFR 51.21, the NRC prepared the
following EA that analyzed the
environmental impacts of the proposed
licensing action. Based on the results of
this EA that follow, and in accordance
with 10 CFR 51.31(a), the NRC has
determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for
these exemption requests and is issuing
a FONSI.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
42026
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2019 / Notices
The estimated $148.4 million amount is
more than three percent of the generic
minimum decommissioning amount
calculated, consistent with a formula set
forth by regulations at 10 CFR 50.75.
Furthermore, withdrawals from the
decommissioning trust fund cannot be
used to fund the PG&E estimated $39.4
million for spent fuel management and
site restoration planning activities
absent (1) a clear indication that monies
in the fund were collected for those
purposes and are clearly and
consistently accounted for separately,2
or (2) an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A)
for use of funds for those purposes.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12,
PG&E requests exemptions from 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(ii) to allow withdrawal of a
total of $187.8 million ($2017) from the
Diablo Canyon NDT to fund radiological
decommissioning, spent fuel
management, and site restoration
planning activities prior to permanent
cessation of operations of Diablo
Canyon, Units 1 and 2, in 2024 and
2025, respectively, to support direct
transition to decommissioning upon
permanent cessation of operations.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The proposed action involves
exemptions from the requirements
related to use of the NDT that are of a
financial nature and allow PG&E to pay
for decommissioning planning activities
necessary to support direct transition to
physical decommissioning upon
permanent shutdown of Diablo Canyon,
Units 1 and 2. The proposed action also
allows PG&E to use these funds to
support planning for spent fuel
management and site restoration
activities.
The NRC has completed its evaluation
and concludes that there is reasonable
assurance that adequate funds are
available in the NDT to complete all
activities associated with radiological
decommissioning. There is no decrease
in safety associated with the NDT being
used to fund planning activities
associated with radiological
decommissioning, spent fuel
2 In 1999, some licensees reporting under 10 CFR
50.75(f) did not distinguish between estimates of
costs to complete decommissioning required by the
NRC (radiological decommissioning) and other
costs associated with cleaning up the site. The NRC
staff issued Regulatory Issue Summary 2001–07,
Revision 1, ‘‘10 CFR 50.75 Reporting and
Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning,’’ to
clarify for licensees the need to preserve the
distinction between radiological decommissioning
cost estimates and all other decommissioning cost
estimates in the reports licensees must submit in
accordance with 10 CFR 50.75.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Aug 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
management, and site restoration. As
required by 10 CFR 50.75, PG&E has
submitted a Decommissioning Funding
Report for Diablo Canyon by letter dated
March 26, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML19094B780), which includes a sitespecific decommissioning cost estimate
for Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2.
The regulations at 10 CFR 50.75
require, in part, that the report include
the amount of decommissioning funds
accumulated, modifications occurring to
a licensee’s current method of providing
financial assurance since the last
submitted report, and plans to adjust
levels of funds assured for
decommissioning to demonstrate that a
reasonable level of assurance will be
provided that funds will be available
when needed to cover the cost of
decommissioning. A licensee for a plant
that is within five years of its projected
end of operation is required to submit
this report annually.
The proposed action will not
significantly increase the probability or
consequences of radiological accidents.
Additionally, the NRC staff has
concluded that the proposed changes
would have no direct radiological
environmental impacts. There are no
changes in the types or amounts of
effluents that are, or may be, released
offsite resulting from these exemptions.
PG&E must continue to comply with all
appropriate NRC regulations related to
occupational and public radiation
exposure, and thus, the exemptions will
not result in an increase to occupational
or public doses.
With regard to the potential
nonradiological environmental impacts,
the proposed action would have no
direct impacts on land use or water
resources, including terrestrial and
aquatic biota, as it involves no new land
disturbing activities, new construction
or modification of plant operational
systems. There would be no changes to
the quality or quantity of
nonradiological effluents, and no
changes to the plant’s National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System permits
would be needed. In addition, there
would be no noticeable effect on
socioeconomic conditions in the region,
no environmental justice impacts, no air
quality impacts, and no impacts to
historic and cultural resources from the
proposed changes. Therefore, there are
no significant nonradiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that
there will be no significant
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the NRC staff considered denial
of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction’’ alternative). Denial of these
exemption requests would result in no
change in current environmental
impacts. Therefore, the environmental
impacts of the proposed action and
alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
There are no unresolved conflicts
concerning alternative uses of available
resources under the proposed action.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On June 6, 2019, the NRC notified the
State of California of this EA and
FONSI. No additional agencies or
persons were consulted regarding the
environmental impact of the proposed
action.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The proposed action would exempt
PG&E from the requirements of 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(ii) to allow PG&E to
withdraw $187.8 million ($2017) from
the Diablo Canyon NDT to fund
radiological decommissioning, spent
fuel management, and site restoration
planning activities. The proposed action
would not significantly affect plant
safety, would not have a significant
adverse effect on the probability of an
accident occurring, and would not have
any significant radiological or nonradiological impacts. The reason the
human environment would not be
significantly affected is that the
proposed action involves an exemption
from requirements that are of a financial
nature that do not have an impact on the
human environment.
The related environmental document
is the Diablo Canyon Final
Environmental Statement dated May
1973 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15043A481),3 which provides the
latest environmental review of
operations of Diablo Canyon, Units 1
and 2.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the
NRC conducted the EA for the proposed
action, which concluded that there will
be no significant environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
This FONSI incorporates by reference
the EA included in Section II of this
document. Accordingly, the NRC has
decided not to prepare an
3 Final Environmental Statement Related to the
Nuclear Generating Station Diablo Canyon, Units 1
and 2, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Docket
Nos. 50–275 and 50–323, May 1973.
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2019 / Notices
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
The finding and other related
environmental documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852. Publicly available records are
accessible electronically from ADAMS
Public Electronic Reading Room on the
internet at the NRC’s website: https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC’s PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or by email
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of August 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Balwant K. Singal,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2019–17599 Filed 8–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2017–96; MC2019–186 and
CP2019–208]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 20,
2019.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
16:10 Aug 15, 2019
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: CP2017–96; Filing
Title: USPS Notice of Amendment to
Priority Mail Contract 282, Filed Under
Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: August 12,
2019; Filing Authority: 39 CFR 3015.5;
Public Representative: Christopher C.
Mohr; Comments Due: August 20, 2019.
2. Docket No(s).: MC2019–186 and
CP2019–208; Filing Title: USPS Request
to Add Priority Mail & First-Class
1 See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting
Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information,
June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No.
4679).
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.301.1
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42027
Package Service Contract 114 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Filing Materials Under Seal; Filing
Acceptance Date: August 12, 2019;
Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR
3020.30 et seq., and 39 CFR 3015.5;
Public Representative: Christopher C.
Mohr; Comments Due: August 20, 2019.
This Notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Darcie S. Tokioka,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–17673 Filed 8–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Product Change—Priority Mail and
First-Class Package Service
Negotiated Service Agreement
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
DATES: Date of required notice: August
16, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 12,
2019, it filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a USPS Request to Add
Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 114 to Competitive
Product List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2019–186,
CP2019–208.
SUMMARY:
Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2019–17580 Filed 8–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release Nos. 33–10670; 34–86628; File No.
265–28]
Investor Advisory Committee Meeting
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of telephonic meeting of
Securities and Exchange Commission
Dodd-Frank Investor Advisory
Committee.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42025-42027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17599]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323; NRC-2019-0131]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power
Plant, Units 1 and 2
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of exemptions in response to a December 13, 2018, request from
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E, the licensee) for Diablo Canyon
Nuclear Power Plant (Diablo Canyon), Units 1 and 2. One exemption would
allow the licensee to use an amount of funds from the Diablo Canyon
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust (NDT) for decommissioning planning above
the amount limitations specified in NRC's regulations. Another
exemption would allow the licensee to use withdrawals from the NDT to
fund planning activities associated with spent fuel management and site
restoration. The NRC staff is issuing a final environmental assessment
(EA) and final finding of no significant impact (FONSI) associated with
the proposed exemptions.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in this document are available on
August 16, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2019-0131 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2019-0131. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first
time that it is mentioned in this document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Balwant K. Singal, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3016, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of exemptions from sections
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 50.82(a)(8)(ii) of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80
and DPR-82, issued to PG&E for operation of Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and
2, located in San Luis Obispo, California. The licensee requested the
exemptions by letter dated December 13, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML18347B552) pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.21,
the NRC prepared the following EA that analyzed the environmental
impacts of the proposed licensing action. Based on the results of this
EA that follow, and in accordance with 10 CFR 51.31(a), the NRC has
determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for these
exemption requests and is issuing a FONSI.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt PG&E from the requirements of 10
CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(ii). One exemption would
allow the licensee to use an amount of funds from the Diablo Canyon NDT
for decommissioning planning above the amount limitations specified in
NRC regulations for operating reactors. Another exemption would allow
the licensee to use withdrawals from the NDT for planning activities
associated with spent fuel management and site restoration. Overall,
the proposed action would allow PG&E to withdraw $187.8 million ($2017)
\1\ from the Diablo Canyon NDT to fund radiological decommissioning,
spent fuel management, and site restoration planning activities
necessary prior to permanent cessation of operations of Diablo Canyon,
Units 1 and 2, in 2024 and 2025, respectively. The proposed action is
in accordance with the licensee's application dated December 13, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In its application, PG&E submitted the decommissioning costs
in 2017 dollars to be consistent with presentation of a year-end
asset balance in the NDT. If the NRC grants the exemptions, funds
would be withdrawn from the NDT in nominal (current) dollars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Need for the Proposed Action
By letter dated November 27, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML18331A553), PG&E informed the NRC of its intention to permanently
cease operation of Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2, on November 2, 2024,
and August 26, 2025, respectively.
The requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(ii) restrict the use of NDT
for decommissioning planning for operating reactors to three percent of
the generic minimum decommissioning amount calculated, consistent with
a formula set forth by the regulations at 10 CFR 50.75. Furthermore, as
required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A), decommissioning trust funds may
be used by the licensee if the withdrawals are for legitimate
decommissioning planning activities, consistent with the definition of
decommissioning in 10 CFR 50.2. This definition addresses radiological
decontamination and does not include activities associated with
irradiated fuel management or site restoration activities. Therefore,
these regulations would limit withdrawal from the Diablo Canyon NDT to
$37.2 million ($18.6 million per unit) and would allow spending only on
planning activities for radiological decommissioning.
PG&E has estimated that a total of $187.8 million ($2017) would be
required to be spent on pre-shutdown planning activities; $148.4
million would be for radiological decommissioning, and $39.4 million
would be for spent fuel management and site restoration planning
activities.
[[Page 42026]]
The estimated $148.4 million amount is more than three percent of the
generic minimum decommissioning amount calculated, consistent with a
formula set forth by regulations at 10 CFR 50.75. Furthermore,
withdrawals from the decommissioning trust fund cannot be used to fund
the PG&E estimated $39.4 million for spent fuel management and site
restoration planning activities absent (1) a clear indication that
monies in the fund were collected for those purposes and are clearly
and consistently accounted for separately,\2\ or (2) an exemption from
the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) for use of funds for those
purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In 1999, some licensees reporting under 10 CFR 50.75(f) did
not distinguish between estimates of costs to complete
decommissioning required by the NRC (radiological decommissioning)
and other costs associated with cleaning up the site. The NRC staff
issued Regulatory Issue Summary 2001-07, Revision 1, ``10 CFR 50.75
Reporting and Recordkeeping for Decommissioning Planning,'' to
clarify for licensees the need to preserve the distinction between
radiological decommissioning cost estimates and all other
decommissioning cost estimates in the reports licensees must submit
in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, PG&E requests exemptions from
10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(ii) to allow withdrawal
of a total of $187.8 million ($2017) from the Diablo Canyon NDT to fund
radiological decommissioning, spent fuel management, and site
restoration planning activities prior to permanent cessation of
operations of Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2, in 2024 and 2025,
respectively, to support direct transition to decommissioning upon
permanent cessation of operations.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The proposed action involves exemptions from the requirements
related to use of the NDT that are of a financial nature and allow PG&E
to pay for decommissioning planning activities necessary to support
direct transition to physical decommissioning upon permanent shutdown
of Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2. The proposed action also allows PG&E
to use these funds to support planning for spent fuel management and
site restoration activities.
The NRC has completed its evaluation and concludes that there is
reasonable assurance that adequate funds are available in the NDT to
complete all activities associated with radiological decommissioning.
There is no decrease in safety associated with the NDT being used to
fund planning activities associated with radiological decommissioning,
spent fuel management, and site restoration. As required by 10 CFR
50.75, PG&E has submitted a Decommissioning Funding Report for Diablo
Canyon by letter dated March 26, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML19094B780), which includes a site-specific decommissioning cost
estimate for Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2.
The regulations at 10 CFR 50.75 require, in part, that the report
include the amount of decommissioning funds accumulated, modifications
occurring to a licensee's current method of providing financial
assurance since the last submitted report, and plans to adjust levels
of funds assured for decommissioning to demonstrate that a reasonable
level of assurance will be provided that funds will be available when
needed to cover the cost of decommissioning. A licensee for a plant
that is within five years of its projected end of operation is required
to submit this report annually.
The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability
or consequences of radiological accidents. Additionally, the NRC staff
has concluded that the proposed changes would have no direct
radiological environmental impacts. There are no changes in the types
or amounts of effluents that are, or may be, released offsite resulting
from these exemptions. PG&E must continue to comply with all
appropriate NRC regulations related to occupational and public
radiation exposure, and thus, the exemptions will not result in an
increase to occupational or public doses.
With regard to the potential nonradiological environmental impacts,
the proposed action would have no direct impacts on land use or water
resources, including terrestrial and aquatic biota, as it involves no
new land disturbing activities, new construction or modification of
plant operational systems. There would be no changes to the quality or
quantity of nonradiological effluents, and no changes to the plant's
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits would be
needed. In addition, there would be no noticeable effect on
socioeconomic conditions in the region, no environmental justice
impacts, no air quality impacts, and no impacts to historic and
cultural resources from the proposed changes. Therefore, there are no
significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the
proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there will be no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of these exemption requests would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. Therefore, the environmental impacts of the
proposed action and alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
There are no unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of
available resources under the proposed action.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On June 6, 2019, the NRC notified the State of California of this
EA and FONSI. No additional agencies or persons were consulted
regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The proposed action would exempt PG&E from the requirements of 10
CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(ii) to allow PG&E to
withdraw $187.8 million ($2017) from the Diablo Canyon NDT to fund
radiological decommissioning, spent fuel management, and site
restoration planning activities. The proposed action would not
significantly affect plant safety, would not have a significant adverse
effect on the probability of an accident occurring, and would not have
any significant radiological or non-radiological impacts. The reason
the human environment would not be significantly affected is that the
proposed action involves an exemption from requirements that are of a
financial nature that do not have an impact on the human environment.
The related environmental document is the Diablo Canyon Final
Environmental Statement dated May 1973 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15043A481),\3\ which provides the latest environmental review of
operations of Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Final Environmental Statement Related to the Nuclear
Generating Station Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323, May 1973.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC conducted the EA for the
proposed action, which concluded that there will be no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. This FONSI
incorporates by reference the EA included in Section II of this
document. Accordingly, the NRC has decided not to prepare an
[[Page 42027]]
environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
The finding and other related environmental documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly available records are accessible
electronically from ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room on the
internet at the NRC's website: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the
NRC's PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-
4737, or by email to [email protected].
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of August 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Balwant K. Singal,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2019-17599 Filed 8-15-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P