Customs Broker Verification of an Importer's Identity, 40302-40317 [2019-17179]
Download as PDF
40302
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
The Proposal
The FAA proposes an amendment to
Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) part 71 to establish Class E surface
airspace at St Simons Island Airport, St
Simons, GA, and Brunswick Golden Isle
Airport, Brunswick, GA. Also, this
action proposes to amend Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface at
Brunswick, GA, by updating the airport
names to St Simons Island Airport
(previously Brunswick/MalcolmMcKinnon Airport), and Brunswick
Golden Isles Airport (previously Glynco
Jetport Airport). Also, the geographic
coordinates of St Simons Island Airport
would be adjusted to coincide with the
FAA’s aeronautical database.
Class E airspace designations are
published in Paragraph 6005, of FAA
Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018,
and effective September 15, 2018, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated, will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August
7, 2019.
Matthew Cathcart,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2019–17369 Filed 8–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
19 CFR Part 111
§ 71.1
RIN 1651–AB17
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6002
Airspace.
Class E Surface Area
*
*
*
*
ASO GA E2
*
St Simons, GA [New]
St Simons Island Airport, GA
(Lat. 31°09′07″ N, long. 81°23′28″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 4.1-mile radius of St Simons
Island Airport.
*
*
*
ASO GA E2
*
*
Brunswick, GA [New]
Brunswick Golden Isles Airport, GA
(Lat. 31°15′33″ N, long. 81°27′59″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 4.2-mile radius of Brunswick
Golden Isles Airport.
*
*
*
ASO GA E2
[Removed]
*
*
*
*
Brunswick Glynco Jetport, GA
*
*
*
ASO GA E2 Brunswick MalcolmMcKinnon Airport, GA [Removed]
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
ASO GA E5
*
*
Brunswick, GA [Amended]
St Simons Island Airport, GA
(Lat. 31°09′07″ N, long. 81°23′28″ W)
Brunswick Golden Isles Airport, GA
(Lat. 31°15′33″ N, long. 81°27′59″ W)
Jekyll Island Airport, GA
(Lat. 31°04′28″ N, long. 81°25′40″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
of the St Simons Island Airport, and within
a 7-mile radius of Brunswick Golden Isles
Airport, and within a 9-mile radius of Jekyll
Island Airport.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[USCBP–2019–0024]
Customs Broker Verification of an
Importer’s Identity
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes to amend
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) regulations to require customs
brokers to collect certain information
from importers to enable the customs
brokers to verify the identity of
importers, including nonresident
importers. CBP proposes these
amendments, pursuant to section 116 of
the Trade Facilitation and Trade
Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA),
which directs CBP to promulgate
regulations to require brokers to verify
the identity of the importers who are
their clients.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
via Docket No. USCBP–2019–0024.
• Mail: Trade and Commercial
Regulations Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, 90 K Street NE,
10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may be inspected during
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and
Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, 90 K Street NE, 10th Floor,
Washington, DC 20229–1177.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325–
0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randy Mitchell, Director, Commercial
Operations Revenue Entry Division,
Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 202–325–6532,
Randy.mitchell@cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of this
proposed rule. U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) also invites comments
that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that
might result from this regulatory
change. Comments that will provide the
most assistance to CBP will reference a
specific portion of the rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information or
authority that support such
recommended change. See ADDRESSES
above for information on how to submit
comments.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Background
Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1641), provides
that individuals and business entities
must hold a valid customs broker’s
license and permit in order to transact
customs business on behalf of others.
The statute also sets forth standards for
the issuance of broker’s licenses and
permits, provides for disciplinary action
against brokers in the form of
suspension or revocation of such
licenses and permits or assessment of
monetary penalties, and provides for the
assessment of monetary penalties
against other persons for conducting
customs business without the required
broker’s license. Section 641 authorizes
the Secretary of the Treasury to
prescribe rules and regulations relating
to the customs business of brokers as
may be necessary to protect importers
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
and the revenue of the United States
and to carry out the provisions of
section 641.1
The regulations issued under the
authority of section 641 are set forth in
part 111 of title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) (19 CFR part
111). Customs brokers serve many
functions when acting on behalf of their
clients, which include resident and
nonresident importers. Customs brokers
file information about their clients’
merchandise and transactions with CBP.
Customs brokers also track shipments,
pay duties and fees to CBP, and keep
current documents and records about
the business they transact on behalf of
their clients, all to help their clients
comply with Federal import and export
laws. See 19 CFR part 111 subpart C.
However, before a customs broker
may transact customs business on behalf
of a client, the broker must obtain a
valid power of attorney (POA). 19 CFR
141.46. A POA authorizes the customs
broker to become that client’s agent and
to prepare and file the necessary
customs documents on their behalf.
A. Current POA Regulations
In the customs broker context, a valid
POA is the written appointment of the
broker as the true and lawful agent of
the principal (i.e., client) allowed to
transact customs business on behalf of
the principal. The regulations governing
POAs are set forth in 19 CFR part 141
subpart C.
A POA may be executed for a
specified part of the principal’s business
(limited power of attorney) or all of the
principal’s customs business (general
power of attorney). See 19 CFR
141.31(a). Pursuant to 19 CFR 141.32,
POAs can be executed through various
means. CBP Form 5291 may be used to
establish a power of attorney. If CBP
Form 5291 is not used, a limited POA
must be executed in the same manner
and as explicit in its terms as CBP Form
5291. 19 CFR 141.32. A general POA
with unlimited authority may be
1 The Homeland Security Act of 2002 generally
transferred the functions of the U.S. Customs
Service from the Treasury Department to the
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). See Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2142. The Act
provides that the Secretary of the Treasury retains
customs revenue functions unless delegated to the
Secretary of DHS. The regulation of customs brokers
is encompassed within the customs revenue
functions set forth in section 412 of the Homeland
Security Act. On May 15, 2003, the Secretary of the
Treasury delegated authority related to the customs
revenue functions to the Secretary of DHS subject
to certain exceptions. See Treasury Order No. 100–
16 (Appendix to 19 CFR part 0). Since the authority
to prescribe the rules and regulations related to
customs brokers is not listed as one of the
exceptions, this authority now resides with the
Secretary of DHS.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40303
executed in any format. See 19 CFR
141.32.
A POA issued by a partnership is
limited to a period not to exceed two
years from the date of execution. 19 CFR
141.34. All other POAs may be granted
for an unlimited period of time. 19 CFR
141.34.
A valid POA requires the principal to
provide only limited information. The
principal is required to provide:
(1) A statement from the principal
authorizing the customs broker to act as
the principal’s agent and for the
customs broker to file entry/entry
summary in the principal’s name for a
shipment;
(2) The name of the individual or the
authorized representative of the sole
proprietorship, partnership, or
corporation executing the POA; and
(3) The name and address of the
individual or business on whose behalf
the POA is being executed.
See 19 CFR 141.32; 141.36–.39.
B. Customs Brokers’ Current Practice for
Verifying Importer’s Identity
While only a limited amount of
information is required for a valid POA,
the majority of customs brokers
currently require additional information
when a POA is obtained from an
importer, which is used by the broker to
verify the importer’s existence and
identity. Brokers require this additional
information and have initiated
processes and procedures to validate an
importer’s identity in order to protect
the broker’s business interests, reduce
identity theft, and help to prevent the
use of shell 2 or shelf 3 companies to
further a business fraud scheme.
Additional information that a broker
might request includes, but is not
limited to, the registration of the
importer’s business with a state
government and the Articles of
Incorporation under which that
business is formed.
CBP provides non-binding guidance
on how brokers can validate importers
when they obtain a POA. For example,
CBP recommends that a broker should,
whenever possible, do the following: 4
2 A shell company is a company without active
business operations or significant assets, which may
be used illegitimately to disguise business
ownership or operations.
3 A shelf company is a company which was
created and maintained by legal means, but is left
dormant for a period of time before its sale to a
buyer, which may serve to conceal the buyer’s
identity and history of business transactions so as
not to appear as a new business entity.
4 See U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
‘‘Validating the Power of Attorney’’ for
comprehensive list of recommendations. Last
published May 25, 2018. Available at https://
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
Continued
14AUP1
40304
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(1) Complete POAs in-person and
review personal identification (driver’s
license, passport, etc.);
(2) Check applicable websites to
verify the business registration with
State authorities;
(3) Confirm business’s trade or
fictitious names that may appear on the
POA;
(4) Verify that the importer’s name,
importer number, and Employer
Identification Number (EIN) (also
known as the Federal Tax Identification
Number) on the POA match what is in
CBP’s Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE);
(5) Check whether an importer is
named as a sanctioned or restricted
person or entity by the U.S.
Government.
Since the collection and verification
of any additional information from the
importer is voluntary, certain brokers do
not require any additional information.
As a result, an atmosphere of ‘‘broker
shopping’’ has been created where an
importer that does not wish to provide
this additional information might refuse
to provide the information to one broker
in the hopes that another broker will not
ask for that information. If the second
broker does not request the additional
information, that broker, with minimal
knowledge about the importer, transacts
customs business on the importer’s
behalf leading to the possible use of
shell or shelf companies, revenue loss,
increased security risks with the goods
being imported into the United States,
and an uneven playing field for brokers.
C. Section 116 of TFTEA
On February 24, 2016, Congress
enacted the Trade Facilitation and
Trade Enforcement Act of 2015
(TFTEA), Section 116, Public Law 114–
125, 130 Stat. 122 (19 U.S.C. 4301 note),
which amended section 641 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1641). Section
116 of TFTEA, Customs Broker
Identification of Importers, specifically
requires the Secretary to promulgate
regulations setting minimum standards
to: (1) Identify the information that an
importer, including a nonresident
importer, is required to submit to a
customs broker and that a broker is
required to collect in order to verify the
identity of the importer; (2) identify
reasonable procedures that a broker is
required to follow in order to verify the
authenticity of the information collected
from the importer; and (3) require the
broker to maintain records of the
information collected by the broker used
to substantiate the importer’s identity.
www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/
customs-brokers/validating-power-attorney.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
Section 116 also empowers the
Secretary to assess a monetary penalty
for each violation for a broker that fails
to collect the information, as well as
revoke or suspend the license or permit
of the broker.
III. Discussion of Proposed
Amendments
CBP proposes to amend the CBP
regulations to standardize the process
by which customs brokers verify the
identity of their clients, specifically
importers and nonresident importers.
These proposed regulations illuminate,
for the international trade community
and the public in general, the important
role customs brokers have in verifying
prospective clients and in ensuring the
quality and integrity of the information
they keep. When brokers verify the bona
fides of clients, CBP is better assured
that importers are conducting legitimate
trade transactions. By formalizing the
verification process and requiring that a
reverification process be carried out by
brokers every year, CBP believes that a
broker’s knowledge of its importer client
would be improved. This improved
broker knowledge could allow for
commercial fraud prevention and
revenue protection and help prevent the
use of shell or shelf companies by
importers who attempt to evade the
customs laws of the United States.
Preventing the use of shell or shelf
companies by importers would help
reduce instances of a misclassification
of merchandise to avoid duties, protect
against intellectual property rights (IPR)
violations, reduce antidumping/
countervailing duty (AD/CVD)
infractions, and reduce the importation
of unsafe merchandise.
As the importer’s and nonresident
importer’s agent, the customs broker is
uniquely situated to collect the
information necessary to authenticate
their identity. CBP has determined that
it is most efficient for the broker to
collect and verify this information at the
time the POA is obtained because the
broker must both verify the client’s
identity and obtain a valid POA before
transacting customs business on behalf
of the client.
CBP is proposing to add a new
section, 111.43, entitled Importer
identity verification, to title 19 of the
CFR to establish the identity collection
criteria and to create a required
verification process of importer and
nonresident importer clients. These
proposed regulations set forth the
minimum requirements a customs
broker must meet to verify the
importer’s identity prior to transacting
customs business on behalf of the
importer or nonresident importer client.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
As discussed above, most customs
brokers already meet or exceed these
minimum requirements. Customs
brokers may continue to exceed the
requirements in proposed section
111.43, regarding the collection of
information and documents, or
conducting research about a client.
Proposed paragraph (a) describes the
general scope of the requirements for
customs brokers to collect, verify, and
maintain the information necessary to
authenticate the identity of their clients.
Proposed paragraph (b) provides
definitions for this section. In
accordance with section 116(a)(i)(4) of
TFTEA, the term ‘‘importer’’ is defined
as one of the parties that qualifies to be
an importer of record under 19 U.S.C.
1484(a)(2)(B) and ‘‘nonresident
importer’’ is defined as an importer of
record that is not a citizen of the United
States or an alien lawfully admitted for
permanent residence in the United
States; or a partnership, corporation, or
other commercial entity that is not
organized under the laws of a
jurisdiction within the customs territory
of the United States (as such term is
defined in General Note 2 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States) or in the Virgin Islands
of the United States.5 The definition of
the term ‘‘client’’ is the importer or
nonresident importer of record who is
seeking or employing the services of a
customs broker to transact customs
business on behalf of the importer or
nonresident importer of record. The
definition of the term ‘‘grantor’’ is the
individual executing the power of
attorney on behalf of the client.
A. Minimum Information That the
Customs Broker Is Required To Collect
From the Client
Proposed paragraph (c) of section
111.43 identifies the information that
the customs broker is required to collect
from the client at the time the POA is
obtained by the broker. The broker
collects this information to verify the
client’s identity.
At the time the POA is obtained by
the broker, the broker must collect, at a
minimum, the following information
from the client, if applicable:
(1) The client’s name;
(2) For a client who is an individual,
the client’s date of birth;
5 We note that the definition for ‘‘nonresident
importer’’ provided by Congress in section 116 of
TFTEA differs from the definition of ‘‘nonresident’’
in 19 CFR 141.31 governing POAs. CBP does not
discuss these differences in this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) because the differing
definitions of ‘‘resident’’ and ‘‘nonresident’’ in 19
CFR part 141 do not influence whether a broker is
required to obtain a POA from a client on behalf
of which it transacts customs business.
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(3) For a client that is a partnership,
corporation, or association, the grantor’s
date of birth;
(4) For a client that is a partnership,
corporation, or association, the client’s
trade or fictitious names;
(5) The address of the client’s
physical location (for a client that is a
partnership, corporation, or association,
the physical location would be the
client’s headquarters) and telephone
number;
(6) The client’s email address and
business website;
(7) A copy of the grantor’s unexpired
government-issued photo identification;
(8) The client’s Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) number, employer
identification number (EIN), or importer
of record (IOR) number;
(9) The client’s publicly available
business identification number (e.g.,
Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNS) number, etc.);
(10) A recent credit report;
(11) A copy of the client’s business
registration and license with state
authorities; and
(12) The grantor’s authorization to
execute power of attorney on behalf of
client.
The broker must collect all the
information that is applicable to that
particular client. Some information
might not be applicable to a client
depending on whether the client is an
individual, partnership, corporation, or
association. For example, a small
business might not have a business
website; or a client who is an individual
would not have a business registration
and license with state authorities or a
publicly available business
identification number. Additionally, if
certain foreign jurisdictions do not
provide credit reports, the broker is not
required to collect a recent credit report
from that client.
Under current practice, most brokers
already collect all of the above
applicable information from the client
in the ordinary course of business. Most
brokers currently require this
information to ensure that the client is
not concealing his or her identity,
misusing another business owner’s
identity, or using a shell or shelf
corporation to further a business fraud
scheme. By requiring all of the
applicable information above from all of
the broker’s clients, the proposed rule
would also eliminate the ability of
prospective clients to ‘‘broker shop.’’
B. Procedures That a Customs Broker Is
Required To Perform To Verify the
Information Collected
CBP is proposing procedures for a
customs broker to use to verify the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
authenticity of the information collected
from its clients. Proposed paragraph (d)
of section 111.43 requires customs
brokers to verify all the information
collected from the client, under
proposed paragraph (c), to ensure
accurate identification of the client.
As explained in Section A. above, the
broker must collect all the information
set forth in proposed paragraph (c) that
is applicable to that client. The broker
would be required to verify each of the
data points (i.e. client’s name, address,
etc.) that the broker collects from that
particular client. The means of
verification that the customs broker uses
for each data point, however, are at the
broker’s discretion. There are various
methods of verification that would
satisfy CBP’s requirement that the
broker verify each data point that the
broker collects. The means of
verification that CBP recommends for
each data point are set forth below and
include in-person verification, review of
the proper evidence of the grantor’s
authorization to execute the POA, and/
or research performed using various
federal agency, state government, and
publicly available data sources. The
broker must use as many of the
recommended verification means as
necessary to be reasonably certain of the
client’s identity.
In addition to verifying each data
point collected, the broker would be
required to check if the client is a
sanctioned or restricted person or entity,
or if the client is suspended or debarred
from doing business with the U.S.
Government.
Under the proposed rule, for any
prospective client, the customs broker
would be required to perform this
verification before transacting customs
business on the client’s behalf. For
existing clients with a POA issued by a
partnership, brokers would have two
years to verify this information and
three years for all other existing clients.
1. The Client’s Name, Address,
Telephone Number, Email Address,
Business Website, Trade or Fictitious
Names
A customs broker could verify the
client’s name, address, telephone
number, email, website, and trade or
fictitious names, if applicable, through
various means. A customs broker could
use the Automated Broker Interface
(ABI) to access ACE to verify a client’s
information. This means of verification
is only available for a broker to access
an existing client’s information for
transactions where the broker
represented the client.
The broker could alternatively check
the client’s unexpired government-
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40305
issued photo identification, the state
licensing database or use open-source
mapping. Customs brokers may also
conduct research using reputable
business information databases,
individual state databases, and credit
reporting entities or any other public or
private database which provides
accurate, timely, and relevant
information about the client.
To verify the client’s address, the
broker could use various navigation and
mapping functions available on public
websites to verify the location. Warning
signs could include an incomplete or
inaccurate address, or providing only a
post office box address. To verify the
telephone number, the broker could
verify whether the number is a landline
as opposed to a cell phone and could
use return call verification to ensure
that the number is accurate. To verify
the email address, the broker could
ensure that there is a return email
message.
If applicable, the broker could visit
the client’s place of business in-person
to verify its existence and the client’s
identity. During this in-person visit, the
broker would be looking for any
possible indication that the client’s
identity is not what he or she provided;
that the business is defunct or
nonexistent; or that the company is a
shell or shelf company. To verify a
business website, the broker could
check the depth of the website, the
business universal resource locator
(URL), and the viability of any links
provided.
2. The Client’s or Grantor’s Date of Birth
There are various ways that a customs
broker could verify the client’s or
grantor’s date of birth. The broker could
perform an in-person review of the
client’s or grantor’s unexpired
government-issued photo identification
to verify the date of birth. Alternatively,
a broker could use individual state
databases or open-source software.
3. The Grantor’s Unexpired
Government-Issued Photo Identification
The customs broker can perform an
in-person review of the grantor’s
unexpired government-issued photo
identification such as a passport or
driver’s license. During this in-person
verification, the broker would be
looking for any possible indications that
the grantor’s identity is not what he or
she provided, or that there is fraud.
Alternatively, the broker may conduct
research using reputable databases to
establish the veracity of the governmentissued photo identification.
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
40306
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
4. The Client’s IRS Number, EIN, or IOR
Number
A customs broker could use federal
government databases or the client’s tax
forms to verify the client’s IRS, EIN, or
IOR number. The broker could also use
the ABI to access ACE to verify an
existing client’s IRS number, EIN, or
IOR number. This means of verification
is only available for a broker to access
an existing client’s information for
transactions where the broker
represented the client. Alternatively, the
broker could conduct research using
reputable public or private databases
and websites, such as
www.freeerisa.com, which is a private
website that provides free access to all
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act (ERISA) form 5500s filed with the
Department of Labor over the past two
years.
5. The Client’s Publicly Available
Business Identification Number
If the client provides a nongovernment issued business identifier,
the broker can use the associated
database to verify the relevant aspects of
that client’s identification. For example,
if the client provides its DUNS number,
the broker could use the Dun and
Bradstreet website at www.DNB.com to
verify the client’s DUNS number,
company name, address, and telephone
number.
6. A Recent Credit Report
To check the client’s credit report, the
broker would check with a nationally
recognized credit reporting entity. When
checking the client’s credit report,
warning signs could include
declarations of bankruptcy, and any
delayed payment history. If the client
informs the broker that a credit report
cannot be provided because its
jurisdiction does not provide credit
reports, the broker must verify this by
checking the address of the client’s
physical location.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
7. The Client’s Business Registration
and License With State Authorities
A broker could use individual state
databases to verify the business
registration and license.
8. The Grantor’s Authorization To
Execute Power of Attorney on Behalf of
Client
A broker is required to confirm that
the grantor has the authority to execute
the POA. When a representative appears
on behalf of the client, the
representative would be required to
provide evidence of his or her
authorization to sign the POA. This
evidence should be notarized whenever
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
possible; however, the person whose
signature is required is dependent on
the type of business. To determine the
type of evidence required, the broker
would review the business’s public
filings, for example, the articles of
incorporation, to determine who holds
the key positions. For a corporation, the
evidence would be a corporate officer
providing certification on the entity’s
letterhead. For a limited liability
company (LLC), the evidence would be
the managing partner or member
providing certification on the entity’s
letterhead. For a partnership,
authorization would be the general and/
or managing partner providing
certification on the entity’s letterhead.
For a sole proprietorship or individual,
evidence of authorization would consist
of a certification, notarized by the sole
proprietor or individual, stating that the
representative was authorized to sign on
behalf of the individual or the sole
proprietor.
9. Check if the Client is a Sanctioned or
Restricted Person or Entity by the U.S.
Government or if the Client is
Suspended or Debarred From Doing
Business With the U.S. Government
The broker would be required to
check to determine if the client is a
sanctioned or restricted person or entity,
or if the client is suspended or debarred
from doing business with the U.S.
Government. The broker could check
this information through any of the
following websites: www.sam.gov, a
U.S. government website that may be
used to search public records for
company registrations; https://
www.treasury.gov/resource-center/
sanctions/Pages/default.aspx, which is
a U.S. Department of Treasury website
identifying Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) sanctioned companies
and individuals; or https://
build.export.gov/main/ecr/eg_main_
023148, which is a consolidated
screening list identifying entities that
have been sanctioned by U.S.
Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration.
C. Requirement To Implement Policies,
Procedures and Internal Controls
Proposed paragraph (e) of section
111.43 requires customs brokers to
implement policies, procedures, and
internal controls to verify a client’s
identity before transacting customs
business on behalf of that client. While
most customs brokers already have such
policies, procedures, and internal
controls in place to collect and verify
this information, this requirement is to
ensure that all brokers implement these
policies, procedures, and internal
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
controls so that brokers are required to
collect the required information from
the client, and to ensure that the broker
has established policies and procedures
to verify and reverify the information.
D. Recordkeeping Requirements
Section 116 of TFTEA requires that
the regulations also set minimum
standards for customs brokers to
maintain records of the information
used to substantiate the client’s identity.
Accordingly, proposed paragraph (f)
requires all customs brokers to make,
retain, and update records containing
the information the brokers collected to
verify the client’s identity.
1. Current Recordkeeping Requirements
Customs brokers must make, retain,
and update certain records of their
transactions with their clients and must
comply with all recordkeeping
requirements. For customs brokers, the
relevant recordkeeping provisions are in
part 111 and part 163 and each broker
must comply with the provisions of
those parts when maintaining records
that reflect on his or her transactions as
a broker. 19 CFR 111.21 and 163.2(d).
Part 163 governs the maintenance,
production, inspection, and
examination of records, in general. Part
111 sets forth the specific recordkeeping
requirements applicable to customs
brokers, and the additional records that
each customs broker must make and
maintain, and make available for CBP
examination.
Pursuant to part 111, customs brokers
are required to keep current records of
account reflecting all their transactions
as a broker, and keep and maintain
copies of all correspondence and other
records relating to their customs
business. 19 CFR 111.21. A broker is not
required to file a POA with CBP but
must retain the POA as part of his or her
records and make it available to
representatives of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).6 See 19 CFR
141.46. Customs brokers must maintain
all these records for the required
retention periods, in a manner that
allows CBP to readily examine them,
and pursuant to an allowable method of
storage. See 19 CFR 111.25 and 163.5.
These records, except for POAs, must be
retained for at least five years after the
date of entry. See 19 CFR 111.23 and
163.4. POAs must be retained until
6 Subpart C of 19 CFR part 111 provides that the
POA and other records must be made available to
representatives of the Department of the Treasury;
however, pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of
2002 and Treasury Order No. 100–16 (Appendix to
19 CFR part 0), this was delegated to representatives
of the Secretary of DHS as opposed to
representatives of the Department of the Treasury.
See Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2142.
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
revoked, and revoked POAs and letters
of revocation must be retained for five
years after the date of revocation or for
five years after the date the client ceases
to be an ‘‘active client’’ as defined in
section 111.29(b)(2)(ii), whichever
period is later. See 19 CFR 111.23 and
163.4.
The proposed regulations add
additional records to 19 CFR part 111
that the customs broker must make,
retain, update, and have readily
available for CBP examination.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Retention of Identification and
Verification Records
Proposed paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of
section 111.43 set forth the minimum
identification and verification records
that customs brokers must retain. At a
minimum, customs brokers must retain
the information required by proposed
paragraph (c), including any
identification records, which consists of
the information presented to the broker
used to identify the client as well as any
certifications the client makes. Customs
brokers must also retain verification
records of the means and documents
relied on to verify the client’s identity
as required by proposed paragraph (d)
and each record must indicate which
information required pursuant to
proposed paragraph (c) was verified by
those means and documents. At a
minimum, for the verification records,
customs brokers must retain
descriptions of any documents relied
upon, any non-documentary methods,
any results of measures undertaken, and
any resolution of discrepancies as well
as who performed the verification and
the date the verification was performed.
Brokers must indicate in the verification
records which information required
pursuant to proposed paragraph (c) was
not collected from the client because it
was inapplicable to that particular
client.
3. Records Must Be Readily Available
for CBP Examination
The identification and verification
records collected by the broker must be
retained in accordance with 19 CFR
111.23 and be made available upon
request by CBP for examination. The
period of retention for the identification
and verification records shall be the
same as for POAs. See 19 CFR 111.23
and 163.4.
4. Updating the POA, Identification and
Verification Records
Proposed paragraph (f)(4) requires
customs brokers to implement
procedures to ensure the accuracy,
timeliness, completeness, and relevancy
of any POA and any information about
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
the client. These procedures must
include a requirement that customs
brokers update their records annually
with any changes to the client, POA, or
the information in the records, and
reverify the client’s identity.
The customs broker would update
this information with new information
or records received through either the
client or through the broker’s
independent research. Customs brokers
must update their information on an
annual basis about any client and its
business to ensure that the information
they have is timely, accurate, complete,
and relevant, and they must reverify the
client’s identity annually using the
procedures set forth in proposed section
111.43(d). Depending on the client,
maintaining the information could
include setting up news alerts about the
client, confirming with a client the
accuracy of information, or setting up
automatic searches in specific
databases. This ensures the quality and
integrity of the information in the POA,
and in the identification and
verification records.
E. Penalties for Failure To Meet the
Requirements
Section 116 of TFTEA amended
section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1641) to authorize the Secretary,
at his or her discretion, to hold any
customs broker liable if the broker fails
to collect the required information for a
monetary penalty not to exceed $10,000
for each violation and to revoke or
suspend a license or permit of the
customs broker pursuant to the
procedures set forth in section 641(d).
Further, it holds that the penalty shall
be assessed in the same manner and
under the same procedures as the
monetary penalties provided for in
section 641(d)(2)(A). See 19 U.S.C.
1641(d)(2)(A). The provisions relating to
assessment of a monetary penalty under
sections 641(b)(6) and (d)(2)(A), Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1641(b)(6) and (d)(2)(A)), are set forth in
19 CFR 111, subpart E.
Proposed paragraph (g) sets forth the
conditions under which CBP may assess
a monetary penalty and the maximum
amount that a penalty may be assessed
for. CBP may, at its discretion, assess a
monetary penalty for a broker’s failure
to collect, verify, secure, retain, update,
or make available for inspection the
information in this section in an amount
not to exceed $10,000 per client. CBP
could also choose to revoke or suspend
the customs broker’s license or permit
in accordance with 19 U.S.C.
1641(d)(2)(B).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40307
F. Timing of Verifications
Proposed paragraph (h) of section
111.43 provides the different timing
requirements for verifications based on
whether it is a prospective or existing
client. This is to allow customs brokers
that are not already collecting, verifying,
and maintaining the information,
additional time to start complying with
the requirements for existing clients.
For prospective clients, customs
brokers would be required to comply
with proposed 19 CFR 111.43 as of the
effective date of the final rule. A
customs broker would not be permitted
to begin transacting customs business
on behalf of that client until the broker
collected the required information and
verified the client’s identity. The broker
would also be required to reverify the
client’s identity on an annual basis.
For existing clients with a POA issued
by a partnership, customs brokers
would have two years from the effective
date of the final rule to verify the
client’s identity, and to update the
necessary identification and verification
records. This is because, as discussed
above, unlike all other POAs, a POA
issued by a partnership is limited to a
period not to exceed two years from the
date of execution. See 19 CFR 141.34.
Brokers would have to reverify the
client’s identity on an annual basis after
the initial verification.
For all other existing clients, customs
brokers would have three years from the
effective date of the final rule to verify
the client’s identity, and to update the
necessary identification and verification
records. The three-year period is to
allow brokers adequate time to verify
existing client’s identities pursuant to
the new regulatory requirements taking
into account the number of existing
POAs and the number of hours per
existing POA that the verification
process will take (see Section IV.
Executive Orders 13563, 12866, and
13771 for more detailed information).
Brokers would have to reverify the
client’s identity on an annual basis after
the initial verification.
IV. Executive Orders 13563, 12866, and
13771
Executive Orders 13563 (‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’)
and 12866 (‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review’’) direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
40308
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. Executive
Order 13771 (‘‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’’) directs
agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs and provides
that ‘‘for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be
identified for elimination, and that the
cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a
budgeting process.’’
This rule is not designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. As this rule is not a
significant regulatory action, it is
exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771,
Titled ‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (April 5,
2017). The regulatory amendments in
this rule are the result of the Trade
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act
of 2015 (TFTEA) (Pub. L. 114–125). This
rule’s annualized net regulatory cost is
$11.7 million using a 7 percent discount
rate and 2017 U.S. dollars. CBP has
prepared the following analysis to help
inform stakeholders of the impacts of
this proposed rule.
1. Need and Purpose of Rule
CBP is one of several agencies that are
responsible for issuing regulations
governing the importation of goods into
the United States. As this process is
complex and involves compliance with
numerous requirements ranging from
agricultural safety to intellectual
property rights, to the payment of
appropriate duties and fees, CBP
licenses customs brokers to assist
importers with the importation process.
As brokers are knowledgeable about the
legal requirements and often have a
great deal of visibility into their clients’
businesses, they are key partners to CBP
in preventing fraud and ensuring that
the correct amount of revenue is
collected. However, brokers’ knowledge
of their importer clients can vary as
there is no current requirement that
standardizes the collection and
verification of broker’s information
about their clients. Most brokers verify
their clients’ information prior to
conducting business with them, even
absent a requirement to do so, but some
do not and there is no universal
standard for this verification. CBP has
for many years provided guidance on
this matter, but it is non-binding, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
not all brokers follow it. We note that
CBP’s guidance closely follows industry
best practice standards that many
brokers have been following for years
and CBP’s guidance standardizes and
publicizes the best practices. CBP does
not have evidence indicating the
guidance changed industry’s behavior.
As such, brokers who properly verify
their importers impose a higher burden
on themselves and their clients than
brokers who do not properly verify their
clients. Also, importers who intend to
commit fraud or are otherwise reluctant
to share their information likely
gravitate toward brokers who do not
thoroughly verify their clients’
information. This puts brokers who
properly verify importers’ identities at a
competitive disadvantage and makes it
easier for fraudulent importers to
remain undetected.
Section 116, Customs Broker
Identification of Importers, of TFTEA
requires CBP to prescribe regulations
governing the customs broker
identification of importers. This
proposed rule would satisfy this
requirement by setting minimum
standards for importers to provide the
information and for customs brokers to
collect this information and verify the
identity of their importer or nonresident
importer clients. The definition of the
term ‘‘client’’ is the importer or
nonresident importer of record who is
seeking or employing the services of a
customs broker to transact customs
business on behalf of the importer or
nonresident importer of record. The
definition of the term ‘‘grantor’’ is the
individual executing the power of
attorney on behalf of the client. This
regulation would reduce fraud by
helping to eliminate the use of shell or
shelf companies, protect U.S.
Government revenue, and ensure level
competitiveness among brokers.
2. Background
Each year, approximately 350,000
importers actively transact customs
business with CBP through one of
approximately 2,093 permitted customs
brokers.7 By regulation, each importer is
required to have a Power of Attorney
(POA) with the broker before the broker
may transact customs business on behalf
of the client. In addition to assisting the
importer with its filings, the broker has
an important function in preventing
fraud. As an importer’s agent and CBPlicensed entity, the broker is uniquely
situated to verify specific data on its
7 Source:
Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch, Office of Trade
[hereinafter referred to as CBP’s Broker
Management Branch], on August 15, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
importer and nonresident importer
clients. The most timely and efficient
way for a broker to request identityverifying information is to do so at the
point of the POA development. A valid
POA is the written appointment of the
broker as the true and lawful agent of
the principal (i.e., client) allowed to
transact ‘‘customs business’’ in the
name of that principal. The broker’s
own professional business interest and
continuing obligation to demonstrate
reasonable care involves determining
that a POA is valid. Currently, the
information required for a valid POA is
limited to:
(1) A statement from the principal
authorizing the broker to act as the
principal’s agent and for the customs
broker to file entry/entry summary in
the principal’s name for a shipment;
(2) The name of the individual or
authorized representative of the sole
proprietorship, partnership, or
corporation executing the POA; and
(3) The name and address of the
individual or business on whose behalf
the POA is being executed.
As noted previously, the vast majority
of customs brokers verify their clients’
identity and industry groups have
established best practices for doing so
over the years. While there is no current
requirement for brokers to verify their
client’s information prior to transacting
customs business on their behalf and
only a limited amount of information is
required for a valid POA, the majority
of brokers currently require importers to
provide them with certain additional
information when a POA is obtained
from an importer, which is used by the
broker to verify the importer’s existence
and identity. This includes, but is not
limited to, the registration of the
importer’s business with a state
government and the Articles of
Incorporation under which that
business is formed. As this validation is
important to prevent fraud and to
protect a broker’s business interests,
CBP provides non-binding guidance on
how brokers can validate importers
when they obtain a POA. For example,
CBP recommends that a broker should,
whenever possible, do the following: 8
(1) Complete POAs in-person and
review personal identification (driver’s
license, passport, etc.);
(2) Check applicable websites to
verify the business registration with
State authorities;
8 Source: U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
‘‘Validating the Power of Attorney.’’ Last published
May 25, 2018. Available at https://www.cbp.gov/
trade/programs-administration/customs-brokers/
validating-power-attorney. Accessed May 31, 2018.
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(3) Confirm business’s trade or
fictitious names that may appear on the
POA;
(4) Verify that the importer’s name,
importer number, and Employer
Identification Number (EIN) (also
known as the Federal Tax Identification
Number) on the POA match what is in
CBP’s Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE); and
(5) Check whether an importer is
named as a sanctioned or restricted
person or entity by the U.S.
Government.
This proposed rule standardizes the
process by which brokers verify the
identities of their importer clients by
requiring that the broker collect
specified identity-verifying information
from the client at the time the POA is
obtained and mandating procedures for
the broker to verify the importer client’s
identity. Since CBP has determined that
it is most efficient for brokers to collect
this information and verify at the time
the POA is obtained, this analysis uses
the number of POAs created and
existing to determine when the importer
client’s identity must be verified
pursuant to this proposed rule’s
requirements.
According to CBP’s Broker
Management Branch and conversations
with members of the trade community,
including one of the major broker
associations and some individual
brokers, for the vast majority—about 95
percent—of POAs obtained by brokers,
the broker has sufficiently verified the
importer client’s identity, a process that
takes about 2 hours per POA.9 The 2
hour time burden can be divided into
four major categories which include
time for recordkeeping. Brokers who
sufficiently verify their clients’ identity
spend approximately 40 minutes to
check state or local business status via
appropriate channels, 20 minutes to
check their clients’ business profile via
organizations such as Dun and
Bradstreet,10 40 minutes to access and
review credit reports, and 20 minutes
for internet research on the client’s
company. CBP requests comment on
these estimates.
CBP estimates that approximately
100,000 new POAs are created annually
9 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on August 15, 2017,
and numerous conversations with the trade in
August 2017. The exact percentage of customs
brokers that do not properly verify importers and
nonresident importer clients is unknowable, as no
broker will readily admit that it is not adequately
verifying importer and nonresident importer
information.
10 Source: Dun and Bradstreet. Get a Dun &
Bradstreet DUNS number. https://www.dnb.com/
duns-number/get-a-duns.html. Accessed March 28,
2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
when an importer either enters into a
relationship with a broker for the first
time or the particulars of the POA
change and a new one is needed.11
Therefore, CBP estimates that brokers
currently spend approximately 190,000
hours per year validating 95 percent of
the importer clients’ identities at the
time the POA is obtained. It also takes
time for importers to provide their
information to their brokers for a POA
and the additional information required
to verify the client’s identity. Based on
conversations with the trade
community, CBP expects that it would
take each importer approximately 1
hour to provide the broker with this
verifying information. Accordingly, CBP
estimates that importers currently spend
approximately 95,000 hours per year
gathering the necessary information to
complete a POA and the additional
information required to verify the
client’s identity.
3. Impacts of Rule
CBP proposes to formalize the process
by which customs brokers verify
importers and nonresident importer
clients. This proposed rule would
require the broker to collect specified
information from the importer client
and for the broker to verify the
information from importers before it
begins working under a new POA
allowing the broker to transact customs
business on behalf of the client.12 In
addition, within three years of the
effective date of this proposed rule
being finalized,13 brokers would also
need to verify this information from
existing clients.14 Additionally, brokers
must continue to make and retain
identification and verification records.
This requirement would be enforceable
11 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on August 16, 2017,
and March 27, 2018. The actual number of new
POAs varies each year. In 2015, there were 84,520
new POAs, in 2016 there were 101,945, and in 2017
there were 101,110.
12 Many brokers currently collect more
information than what this proposed rule requires
and they may continue to do so. This proposed rule
simply establishes a minimum threshold of
information that the client must provide and that
the broker must verify.
13 For any existing client with a POA issued by
a partnership, the broker also must verify the
client’s identity. Existing clients with partnership
POAs will need to have their identities verified
within two years from the effective date of this
proposed rule being finalized and reverified every
year thereafter. However, according to subject
matter experts from CBP’s Broker Management
Branch, partnership POAs represent less than 1%
of active POAs, though we lack data on the precise
number of partnership POAs. To the extent
partnership POAs are affected, it will increase
broker costs by a small amount because they may
require verification sooner than estimated.
14 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on May 17, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40309
according to the recordkeeping
requirements of current broker
regulations in 19 CFR part 111 and part
163. Finally, brokers will now be
required to reverify the client’s identity
and update their records annually with
any changes to the client, POA, or
information in the records.
The information that the customs
broker would now be required to
collect, at minimum, from the importer
client under this proposed rule is as
follows, if applicable:
• The client’s name;
• For a client who is an individual,
the client’s date of birth;
• For a client that is a partnership,
corporation, or association, the grantor’s
date of birth;
• For a client that is a partnership,
corporation, or association, the client’s
trade or fictitious names;
• The address of the client’s physical
location (for a client that is a
partnership, corporation, or association,
the physical location would be the
client’s headquarters) and telephone
number;
• The client’s email address and
business website;
• A copy of the grantor’s unexpired
government-issued photo identification;
• The client’s Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) number, Employer
Identification Number (EIN), or Importer
of Record (IOR) number;
• The client’s publicly available
business identification number (e.g.,
DUNS number, etc.);
• A recent credit report;
• A copy of the client’s business
registration and license with state
authorities; and
• The grantor’s authorization to
execute power of attorney on behalf of
client.
Importer clients can obtain a DUNS
number without cost and already report
their DUNS number on CBP Form 5106.
Brokers can verify the DUNS number
online for free. The time it takes to do
this is included in the estimated time to
verify an importer client’s information.
The broker must collect all the
information that is applicable to that
particular client. Some information
might not be applicable to a client
depending on whether the client is an
individual, partnership, corporation or
association. For example, a small
business might not have a business
website; and a client who is an
individual would not have a business
registration and license with state
authorities or a publicly available
business identification number.
Additionally, certain foreign
jurisdictions do not provide credit
reports; accordingly, if the address of
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
40310
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
the client’s physical location is located
in one of those jurisdictions, the broker
is not required to collect a recent credit
report from that client.
Once customs brokers collect this data
from importers and nonresident
importers, brokers would need to check
to determine whether the importer
client is named as a sanctioned or
restricted person or entity by the U.S.
Government, or if the client is
suspended or debarred from doing
business with the U.S. Government, and
would need to verify all the information
collected from the importer client using
various federal agency, state
government, and publicly available data
sources. The means of verification are at
the customs broker’s discretion. The
broker must use as many of the
recommended verification means as
necessary to be reasonably certain as to
the client’s identity. Some of the tools
that are recommended for verifying this
information include:
• A check of the appropriate websites
to determine whether the client is
named as a sanctioned or restricted
person or entity by the U.S.
Government, or if the client is
suspended or debarred from doing
business with the U.S. Government;
• An in-person review of the grantor’s
unexpired government-issued
identification;
• An in-person client meeting;
• An in-person visit of the client’s
place of business;
• A review of the client’s Articles of
Incorporation; and
• A query of publicly available
information, business information and
credit reporting entities, Federal, state,
and local databases or websites and any
other relevant trade or business sources.
As previously stated, conscientious
brokers already require information
from the importer or nonresident
importer client in order to verify the
client’s identity. According to CBP’s
Broker Management Branch and
conversations with the trade
community, for approximately 5 percent
of POAs, the brokers do not require
most or any of this additional
information and the importer clients’
identities are not currently verified or
are only minimally verified.15 As a
15 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on August 15, 2017.
The exact percentage of customs brokers that do not
properly verify importers and nonresident importer
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
Brokers currently have approximately
350,000 POAs with importer clients, for
which brokers would now need to verify
the client’s identity under this rule
within three years of the effective date
of this proposed rule being finalized.
CBP assumes that brokers would verify
the importer client’s identity for onethird of these existing POAs each year
beginning in 2019—or about 116,666
each year from 2019 to 2021—to satisfy
this rule’s new verification requirement
(see Table 1).16 These existing
verifications would each take
approximately 2 hours and can be
divided into four distinct time-burden
categories that were identified
earlier.17 18 There is a time cost of $59.52
each, according to CBP’s assumed
hourly time value for customs brokers of
$29.76.19 20 Based on the historical
number of POAs created each year, CBP
estimates that 100,000 new POAs would
be created each year between 2019 and
2023 (see Table 1). CBP estimates that
in the absence of this rule, brokers
would have verified 95 percent of the
importer clients’ identities for new
POAs—or 95,000 POAs—while the
remaining 5 percent—or 5,000—new
POAs would have the clients’ identities
go unverified based on historical
estimates. According to CBP’s Broker
Management Branch, this rule’s
verification requirements would not
increase the time burden for the 95
percent of instances where brokers
verify the importer client’s identity for
each new POA. The specific information
brokers currently require may be
different than the information required
under this rule, but we estimate that it
takes approximately two hours to verify
either set of data. As such, this rule will
have no additional time burden to do
the initial validation of the importer
client’s identity for the POA. The
remaining 5 percent of brokers who do
not currently verify the client’s identity
would incur a two-hour time burden for
the verification of the importer client’s
identity for a POA under this rule,21 at
an added time cost of $59.52 per new
POA according to CBP’s assumed hourly
time value for customs brokers.22
clients is unknowable because no broker will
readily admit that it is not adequately verifying
importer and nonresident importer information.
16 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on August 15, 2017.
17 The two hours includes the time to implement
policies, procedures and internal controls for
identity verification, and to keep records containing
the information used to verify the importer.
18 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on August 15, 2017.
19 2-hour time burden for broker to verify
information of the client’s identity for an existing
POA × $29.76 hourly time value for customs
brokers = $59.52 time cost.
20 CBP bases the $29.76 hourly time value for
customs brokers on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’
(BLS) 2017 median hourly wage rate for Cargo and
Freight Agents ($20.11), which CBP assumes best
represents the wage for brokers, by the ratio of BLS’
average 2017 total compensation to wages and
salaries for Office and Administrative Support
occupations (1.4801), the assumed occupational
group for brokers, to account for non-salary
employee benefits, and rounded. Source of median
wage rate: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Occupational Employment Statistics, ‘‘May 2017
National Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates, United States—Median Hourly Wage by
Occupation Code: 43–5011.’’ Updated March 30,
2018. Available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/2017/
may/oes_nat.htm#43-0000 . Accessed March 26,
2019. The total compensation to wages and salaries
ratio is equal to the calculated average of the 2017
quarterly estimates (shown under Mar., June, Sep.,
Dec.) of the total compensation cost per hour
worked for Office and Administrative Support
occupations divided by the calculated average of
the 2017 quarterly estimates (shown under Mar.,
June, Sep., Dec.) of wages and salaries cost per hour
worked for the same occupation category. Source of
total compensation to wages and salaries ratio data:
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation. Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation Historical Listing March
2004–December 2018, ‘‘Table 3. Civilian workers,
by occupational group: Employer costs per hours
worked for employee compensation and costs as a
percentage of total compensation, 2004–2018 by
Respondent Type: Office and administrative
support occupations.’’ Available at https://
www.bls.gov/web/ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed
March 26, 2019.
21 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch in March 2018. The
100,000 figure is a rounded average of the number
of POAs that were filed in 2015 (84,520), 2016
(101,945), and 2017 (101,110).
22 2-hour added time burden for broker to verify
information of the importer’s identity for a new
POA × $29.76 hourly time value for customs
brokers = $59.52 time cost.
result of this rule, all brokers will be
required to verify all of the specified
information collected from the client to
verify the client’s existence and identity
for all POAs granted by importers and
nonresident importer clients and this
information will need to be reverified
annually. CBP analyzes the costs and
benefits of these new requirements over
a 5-year period of analysis spanning
from 2019 to 2023.
4. Costs
Costs to Brokers
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
40311
TABLE 1—PROJECTED NUMBER OF POAS REQUIRING BROKER VERIFICATION WITH RULE
Existing POAs
requiring
identityverification
Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
New POAs
requiring
identityverification
Total POAs
requiring
identityverification
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
116,667
116,667
116,666
0
0
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
121,667
121,667
121,667
5,000
5,000
Total ......................................................................................................................................
350,000
25,000
375,000
To estimate the total time cost for
brokers to verify existing importer
clients’ identities, CBP multiplies the
projected number of existing POAs
requiring identity-verification during
the period of analysis shown in Table 1
by the $59.52 time cost to complete each
identity-verification of an existing client
by measuring the existing POAs.
Accordingly, CBP finds that brokers
would incur undiscounted costs totaling
$20.8 million to verify existing clients’
identities from 2019 to 2023 following
this rule’s implementation (see Table 2).
Brokers who do not already conduct
client identity verifications would
sustain a total time cost of $1.5 million
for verification of the importer client’s
identity based on their $59.52 added
time burden and their projected number
of client identities verified measured by
the number of projected POAs over the
period of analysis (see Table 1 and
Table 2). Altogether, the total
undiscounted cost of this rule to brokers
would measure $22.3 million from 2019
to 2023.
TABLE 2—TOTAL COST FOR BROKERS TO VERIFY CLIENT’S IDENTITY FOR EXISTING AND NEW POAS WITH RULE
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
Time cost
to verify
existing POAs
Year
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Time cost
to verify
new POAs
Total time
cost for
brokers
to verify
existing and
new POAs
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
$6,944,020
6,944,020
6,944,020
0
0
$297,600
297,600
297,600
297,600
297,600
$7,241,620
7,241,620
7,241,620
297,600
297,600
Total ......................................................................................................................................
20,832,000
1,488,000
22,320,000
Additionally, as a result of this rule,
customs brokers will need to update
their records and reverify on an annual
basis that the POA information, and the
identification and verification records
for their importer clients is accurate.
According to CBP’s Broker Management
Branch, there are approximately 350,000
active importers of record (IORs) in any
given year and that is not expected to
change significantly—on average any
new IORs are offset by IORs that become
inactive.23 Brokers will now have to
verify all 350,000 existing client’s
identities as measured by the existing
POAs within three years of the effective
date of this proposed rule being
finalized and reverify the client’s
identity annually thereafter. As
discussed earlier, we expect brokers to
do the initial verification evenly over
the course of the first three years (see
Table 1). The reverifications, then, will
23 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on April 12, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
lag the initial verifications by a year. As
the new importers are offset by
importers who become inactive, brokers
will need to reverify 350,000 existing
clients’ identities each year, after the
initial 3-year verification window. Table
3 shows the number of verifications we
estimate for each year. These
verifications would each take
approximately 45 minutes (.75 hours) to
complete,24 at a time cost of $22.32
each, according to CBP’s assumed
hourly time value for customs brokers of
$29.76.25 Table 3 shows the estimated
costs of this reverification. The total
undiscounted cost to verify and update
recordkeeping requirements for existing
and prospective clients as measured by
existing and new POAs is $23,436,022
over the period of the analysis.
24 Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s
Broker Management Branch on March 20, 2018.
25 0.75-hour time burden for broker to verify
information of the importer client’s identity for an
existing POA × $29.76 hourly time value for
customs brokers = $22.32 time cost.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
TABLE 3—TOTAL COST FOR BROKERS
TO VERIFY AND UPDATE RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING AND NEW CLIENTS WITH RULE
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total POAs
requiring
annual
reverification
Total time cost
to reverify
POAs
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
0
116,667
233,334
350,000
350,000
$0
2,604,007
5,208,015
7,812,000
7,812,000
Total ......
1,050,000
23,436,022
Costs to Importers
In addition to its costs to brokers, this
rule would impose costs on the broker’s
existing and prospective importer
clients now required to provide
additional identity-verifying data to
brokers for their existing and new POAs.
Based on conversations with the trade
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
40312
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
community, CBP assumes that each
existing POA corresponds to a unique
importer of record.26 As a result, CBP
estimates that 350,000 existing importer
clients would provide identity-verifying
data to brokers for 350,000 existing
POAs within three years of the effective
date of this proposed rule being
finalized (see Table 1). CBP expects that
it would take each importer
approximately one hour to provide the
broker with this identity-verifying
information, at a time cost of $29.76
according to CBP’s assumed hourly time
value for importers of $29.76.27 28
Considering this time cost and the
projected number of existing POAs
where the importer’s identity must be
verified during the period of analysis
(see Table 1), CBP finds that importers
would incur a total cost of $10.4 million
to provide identity-verifying
information to their brokers for existing
POAs (see Table 4). For new POAs
where the importer’s identity must be
verified, CBP estimates that importers
already provide most of the additional
identity-verifying information required
in this rule to brokers for 95 percent—
or 95,000—of new POAs each year. As
stated above, while the specific
information brokers require currently
may vary, it is generally very similar to
what this rule requires that the brokers
collect. Hence, CBP assumes these
importers would not incur an added
burden to provide identity-verifying
information to their brokers with this
rule beyond what they already bear. For
the remaining 5 percent—or 5,000—of
POAs where the importer’s identity is
not currently verified, this rule would
require brokers to collect such
information from their clients. Like with
existing POAs, CBP believes that it
would take each importer
approximately one hour to provide the
broker with this identity-verifying
information, at a time cost of $29.76
according to CBP’s assumed hourly time
value for importers of $29.76.29 By
applying this time cost to the 5,000 new
POAs where the importer’s identity
would not be verified absent this rule,
CBP estimates that some importers
would sustain undiscounted costs
totaling $0.7 million over the period of
analysis from this rule’s identityverifying data submission requirement
(see Table 4). In all, this rule would
impose undiscounted costs of $11.2
million on importers between 2019 and
2023, as illustrated in Table 4.
TABLE 4—TOTAL COST FOR IMPORTERS TO PROVIDE IDENTITY-VERIFYING DATA FOR EXISTING AND NEW POAS WITH
RULE
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
Time cost for
existing
importers to
provide
verifying
data for
existing POAs
Time cost for
new importers
to provide data
for verification
Total time cost
for importers
to provide data
for verification
of existing and
new POAs
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
$3,472,010
3,472,010
3,471,980
0
0
$148,800
148,800
148,800
148,800
148,800
$3,620,810
3,620,810
3,620,810
148,800
148,800
Total ......................................................................................................................................
10,416,000
744,000
11,160,000
Year
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Brokers are required to obtain recent
credit reports from their client importers
for use in the verification process. We
next estimate the cost of running credit
reports to the importer. It is common
practice among businesses to
periodically run their own credit report,
so we expect most importers to simply
provide the broker with a previously
run credit report. For the purposes of
this analysis, we again assume that 95%
of importers are already providing their
credit report to the broker or that they
routinely run their own credit report for
their own purposes. There is not a
financial cost to these importers.30 The
remaining 5 percent or approximately
5,000 importers will incur a costs by
purchasing credit reports with credit
scores from each of the credit bureaus
(Equifax, Experian, and Transunion).
The three reports costs approximately
$40.31 Table 5 shows the costs to
importers working with brokers not
currently accessing free credit reports
from their clients.
26 Some importers have several importer of record
numbers, but each requires its own POA.
27 1-hour time burden for importer to provide
broker with the required information to verify the
importer’s identity for an existing POA × $29.76
hourly time value for importers = $29.76 time cost.
28 CBP bases the $29.76 hourly time value for
importers on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS)
2017 median hourly wage rate for Cargo and Freight
Agents ($20.11), which CBP assumes best
represents the wage for importers, by the ratio of
BLS’ average 2017 total compensation to wages and
salaries for Office and Administrative Support
occupations (1.4801), the assumed occupational
group for importers, to account for non-salary
employee benefits, and rounded. Source of median
wage rate: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Occupational Employment Statistics, ‘‘May 2017
National Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates, United States—Median Hourly Wage by
Occupation Code: 43–5011.’’ Updated March 30,
2018. Available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
oes_nat.htm. Accessed March 26, 2019. The total
compensation to wages and salaries ratio is equal
to the calculated average of the 2017 quarterly
estimates (shown under Mar., June, Sep., Dec.) of
the total compensation cost per hour worked for
Office and Administrative Support occupations
divided by the calculated average of the 2017
quarterly estimates (shown under Mar., June, Sep.,
Dec.) of wages and salaries cost per hour worked
for the same occupation category. Source of total
compensation to wages and salaries ratio data: U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation. Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation Historical Listing March
2004–December 2018, ‘‘Table 3. Civilian workers,
by occupational group: employer costs per hours
worked for employee compensation and costs as a
percentage of total compensation, 2004–2017 by
Respondent Type: Office and administrative
support occupations.’’ Available at https://
www.bls.gov/web/ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed
March 26, 2019.
29 1-hour time burden for importer to provide
broker with information to verify the importer’s
identity for a new POA × $29.76 hourly time value
for importers = $29.76 time cost.
30 Source: Communication with CBP’s Broker
Management Branch on March 23, 2019, and
numerous conversations with the trade in August
2017. During the March 23, 2019 discussion with
the Broker Management Branch, the branch noted
that there can be a cost to brokers for collecting
credit reports that range between $35 to $50
depending on the source.
31 Source: Experian. Consumer Products. https://
www.experian.com/consumer-products/experianequifax-transunion-credit-report-and-score.html.
Accessed March 27, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5—COST OF CREDIT REPORT
FOR IMPORTERS
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
New POAs
requiring
identityverification
Credit report
costs
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
$200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
Total ......
25,000
1,000,000
Total Costs
Table 6 summarizes the costs of this
rule to brokers and importers.
Altogether, this rule would impose a
total undiscounted cost of $57.9 million
on the trade community from 2019 to
2023.
TABLE 6—TOTAL COST OF RULE TO
BROKERS AND IMPORTERS
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
Total cost of
importer ID
rule
Year
2019 ......................................
2020 ......................................
2021 ......................................
$11,062,430
13,666,437
16,270,355
40313
TABLE 6—TOTAL COST OF RULE TO
BROKERS AND IMPORTERS—Continued
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
Year
Total cost of
importer ID
rule
2022 ......................................
2023 ......................................
8,458,400
8,458,400
Total ..................................
57,916,022
When discounted, as shown in Table
7, this cost would measure $51.4
million in present value and $11.7
million on an annualized basis (using a
7 percent discount rate and 2017 U.S.
dollars).
TABLE 7—TOTAL MONETIZED PRESENT VALUE AND ANNUALIZED COSTS OF RULE, 2019–2023
[2017 U.S. dollars]
3% Discount
rate
Present Value Cost ..................................................................................................................................................
Annualized Cost .......................................................................................................................................................
$54,922,999
11,643,386
7% Discount
rate
$51,403,406
11,716,647
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Note: The estimates in this table are contingent upon CBP’s projections as well as the discount rates applied.
5. Benefits
Most brokers are already verifying the
identity of their prospective clients
when they begin their business
relationship, but there are some who do
not. Based on conversations with the
broker community, CBP estimates that
five percent of importers’ identities are
not currently verified or are only
minimally verified. Those who do not
wish to be thoroughly verified
sometimes ‘‘broker shop’’ for a broker
that does not require the same amount
of verifying information. While some
importers simply do not want to share
more information with their brokers
than is required, others intend to
commit fraud and import illicit and/or
counterfeit goods into the United States.
These fraudulent importers seek out
brokers who do not ask for verifying
information in order to use a shell or
shelf company to import fraudulent
goods into the United States. When the
customs broker or CBP discovers the
illegal activities and attempts to
penalize the shell or shelf company, it
disappears. By formalizing the
verification process for importers and
requiring that it be carried out every
year, this proposed rule would help
prevent the use of shell or shelf
companies by importers who attempt to
commit fraud against the United States.
The fraud this proposed rule is
intended to prevent can take a number
of forms. It can range from
misclassifying merchandise to avoid
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
duties to intellectual property rights
(IPR) violations, to antidumping/
countervailing duty (AD/CVD)
infractions, to the importation of unsafe
merchandise. CBP believes that this
proposed rule would improve brokers’
knowledge of the importers. This
improved broker knowledge could allow
for commercial fraud prevention and
revenue protection. According to CBP’s
Broker Management Branch, from
approximately 2007 to 2017, there was
about $3.3 billion in uncollected duties
related to AD/CVD violations by shell
companies. Fifteen percent of these
business entities are out of business.
Their business model is to open, import
merchandise subject to AD/CVD for a
short period of time, and then shut
down operations and disappear to avoid
paying the required duties.32 As CBP
cannot find the party responsible for
importing, the duties can remain unpaid
forever. Similarly, these shell
companies frequently engage in the
trade of counterfeit and pirated goods.
The Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development estimates
that counterfeit and pirated products
accounted for as much as $461 billion
dollars in world trade in 2013.33 This
32 Source: Email correspondent with CBP’s Broker
Management Branch on April 20, 2018.
33 Source: Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated
Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact. Accessed
April 25, 2018. https://www.oecd.org/industry/
global-trade-in-fake-goods-worth-nearly-half-atrillion-dollars-a-year.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed rule will help prevent
companies from engaging in these types
of fraud because they will need to share
real, verified information with their
broker, which will make it much more
difficult for those liable to disappear.
When shell or shelf companies
importing goods into the United States
do disappear before paying outstanding
customs bills for duties, taxes and fees,
CBP must collect the outstanding debt
from sureties who issue bonds for the
imported merchandise. The amount of
duties, taxes, and fees that CBP may
collect from sureties is limited by the
value of the bond. In some instances,
the bond value is insufficient to cover
all outstanding duties, taxes, and fees
owed by the importer. Consequently,
there is a loss of revenue for CBP. At the
same time, sureties incur additional
costs to cover the duties, taxes, and fees
collected against the bonds. This
proposed rule will allow brokers to
more effectively vet importers and
reduce the number of bad actors. This
will decrease revenue loss for the
government and reduce costs incurred
by sureties.
Reducing fraud by shell or shelf
companies is a benefit to all parts of the
economy. The United States
Government would benefit by collecting
the appropriate revenue for imported
merchandise. To the extent that it
avoids fruitless enforcement actions
against shell or shelf companies that
disappear, it would also save on
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
40314
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
enforcement costs. Brokers would
benefit as they would have better
knowledge of their importers and would
be better able to avoid engaging in
business with fraudulent companies.
Brokers would also benefit through the
leveling of the playing field in obtaining
new clients or retaining current clients.
Currently, brokers who properly verify
their importer client’s identity when the
POA is obtained incur costs verifying
the importer’s identity and can lose
customers to brokers who do not ask
importers for information to verify their
identity. This proposed rule would
eliminate the opportunity to ‘‘broker
shop’’ for a broker that does not require
as much identifying information from
the importers. The larger trade
community would benefit from this
proposed rule as it would reduce
identity theft, the number of counterfeit
or IPR-violative imports, and it would
help enforce AD/CVD laws. The
American public would benefit through
any reduction in unsafe merchandise
that results from this proposed rule.
Finally, this proposed rule fulfills the
congressional mandate in TFTEA that
CBP issue regulations governing the
broker identification of importers.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
and Fairness Act of 1996, requires
agencies to assess the impact of
regulations on small entities. A small
entity may be a small business (defined
as any independently owned and
operated business not dominant in its
field that qualifies as a small business
per the Small Business Act); a small notfor-profit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
This proposed rule will affect all
customs brokers and IORs. The vast
majority of customs brokers and
importers are small businesses, so this
rule would have an impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
However, these impacts will not be
significant. As stated above, as a result
of this rule, brokers would need to
collect identity-verifying information
from both their existing importer clients
and prospective importer clients within
three years of the effective date of this
proposed rule being finalized.34 CBP
estimates that the monetized value of
time spent by importers to provide this
data costs $29.76 per POA. Additionally
about five percent of importers not
currently working with brokers
requesting credit reports with scores
might incur a $40 fee, as noted above.
CBP does not consider the time cost of
$29.76 and possibly a $40 fee to be a
significant cost to importers. It is
possible that some importers may have
more than one IOR number and
therefore more than one POA where
their identity would need to be verified,
but that is less likely for small
businesses. We note that even in an
extreme case where a small business has
10 POAs for each of its IOR numbers,
the time cost would be only $297.60 (or
even less if there are efficiencies in
submitting similar information multiple
times) with a possible $40 credit report
fee, which CBP also does not consider
a significant impact.
Brokers would incur costs associated
with verifying their importer client’s
identity whether they are prospective or
existing clients. Above, as seen in
Tables 2 and 3 we estimate that in the
most costly year (2021), 2,093 permitted
brokers bear total costs of $12,449,635
for an average of $5,948.22 per
permitted broker. However, it is
unlikely that the burden is spread
evenly among brokers; those with more
clients would need to verify more
importer clients’ identities, so their
costs would be higher. To estimate the
burden per broker and to assess whether
the burden is significant, we will go
through the following steps:
• Estimate the number of small
brokers in various revenue categories.
• Per each category of brokers,
estimate the additional number of POAs
for which brokers will need to verify the
importer client’s identity.
• Estimate the cost per permitted
broker of these verifications.
• Estimate the ratio of costs to annual
revenue to assess whether the costs are
significant.
To estimate the number of small
brokers in different size categories, we
use data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
The U.S. Census Bureau categorizes
customs brokers under the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code 488510, which
also includes other businesses such as
freight forwarders.35 The Small
Business Administration (SBA)
considers a business entity classified
under the 488510 NAICS code as small
if it has less than $15 million in annual
receipts.36 As shown in Table 8, 95
percent of businesses classified under
this NAICS code are small businesses.
For the purposes of this analysis, we
will assume that all brokers are small
businesses. To the extent some are not,
the impact on small businesses will be
smaller than estimated in this analysis.
We estimate the number of firms in each
revenue category by allocating the 2,093
permitted brokers proportionally to the
number of total firms in the NAICS
code.
TABLE 8—BUSINESS ENTITY DATA FOR NAICS CODE 488510
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Annual revenue ($)
(midpoint)
Number of
firms
<100,000 (50,000) .................................................................................................................
100,000–499,999 (300,000) ..................................................................................................
500,000–999,999 (750,000) ..................................................................................................
1,000,000–2,499,999 (1,750,000) .........................................................................................
2,500,000–4,999,999 (3,750,000) .........................................................................................
5,000,000–7,499,999 (6,250,000) .........................................................................................
7,500,000–9,999,999 (8,750,000) .........................................................................................
10,000,000–14,999,999 (12,500,000) ...................................................................................
34 For any existing client with a POA issued by
a partnership, the broker also must verify the
client’s identity. Existing clients with partnership
POAs will need to have their identities verified
within two years from the effective date of this
proposed rule being finalized and reverified every
year thereafter. However, according to subject
matter experts from CBP’s Broker Management
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
Branch, partnership POAs represent less than 1%
of active POAs, though we lack data on the precise
number of partnership POAs. To the extent
partnership POAs are affected, it will increase
broker costs by a small amount.
35 Source: U.S. Census. https://www.census.gov/
cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch?code=488510&
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Estimated
number of
permitted
brokers
Small
2,195
4,935
2,330
2,429
1,208
540
284
282
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
323
727
343
358
178
80
42
42
search=2012%20NAICS%20Search. Accessed
August 8, 2018.
36 Source: U.S. Small Business Administration.
Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to
North American Industry Classification System
Codes. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/
Size_Standards_Table_2017.pdf. Accessed March
21, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
40315
TABLE 8—BUSINESS ENTITY DATA FOR NAICS CODE 488510—Continued
Annual revenue ($)
(midpoint)
Number of
firms
Estimated
number of
permitted
brokers
Small
>15,000,000 ...........................................................................................................................
815
No
0
Total ................................................................................................................................
15,018
* (14,203/15,018)
2,093
Source: U.S. Census Bureau. 2012 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment Industry. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/econ/susb/
2012-susb-annual.html.
* 95 percent are small.
Now that we have estimated the
number of permitted brokers in each
size category, we estimate how much of
each type of IOR verification will be
done by brokers in each category. We
use total annual revenue as a proxy for
the number of clients (IORs) each broker
has. While cases may exist where a
broker generates a lot of revenue from
just a few IORs or conversely that a
broker generates little revenue from
many IORs, on average we expect that
the number of clients is well correlated
with the broker’s revenue. To estimate
total revenue for each size category, we
use the category’s revenue midpoint. We
determine the different types of client
identities that need to be verified as
existing importer clients; clients that
need their POAs, information and
records to be annually reverified and
updated; and prospective clients, and
we allocate these to the different types
of POAs (existing POAs requiring
identity-verification, POAs needing
annual verification, and new POAs
needing identity-verification)
proportionally to the total revenue for
each size category. Table 9 shows the
number of brokers in each revenue
category, their total revenue, and the
number of each type of POA for which
the brokers would need to verify the
importer client’s identity under this
proposed rule. Note that we present
estimates for 2021, which is the most
costly year for brokers.
TABLE 9—POAS BY SIZE CATEGORY IN 2021
Estimated
number of
brokers
Annual revenue ($)
(midpoint)
Total revenue
(000 ’)
Existing POAs
POAs
requiring
annual
reverification
New POAs
requiring
verification
<100,000 (50,000) ...............................................................
100,000–499,999 (300,000) .................................................
500,000–999,999 (750,000) .................................................
1,000,000–2,499,999 (1,750,000) ........................................
2,500,000–4,999,999 (3,750,000) ........................................
5,000,000–7,499,999 (6,250,000) ........................................
7,500,000–9,999,999 (8,750,000) ........................................
10,000,000–14,999,999 (12,500,000) ..................................
323
727
343
358
178
80
42
42
$16,150
218,100
257,250
626,500
667,500
500,000
367,500
525,000
593
8,007
9,444
22,999
24,504
18,355
13,491
19,273
1,186
16,013
18,888
45,999
49,009
36,711
26,982
38,546
25
343
405
986
1,050
787
578
826
Total ..............................................................................
2,093
3,178,000
116,667
233,334
5,000
We next estimate the costs per broker.
In the analysis above, we estimated that
the cost per verification for existing
clients’ identities for each POA and the
initial verification of the prospective
client’s identity for new POAs was each
$59.52. Additionally, as shown in the
analysis above, the cost for each
reverification of the client’s identity was
$22.32. We multiply these costs to the
number of POAs from Table 9 to reach
the total costs for each broker category,
shown in Table 10 below.
TABLE 10—BROKER COSTS BY SIZE CATEGORY IN 2021
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Annual revenue ($)
(midpoint)
Cost for
existing POAs
Cost for
annual
revalidation
Cost for
new POAs
requiring
verification
Total cost
<100,000 (50,000) ...........................................................................................
100,000–499,999 (300,000) ............................................................................
500,000–999,999 (750,000) ............................................................................
1,000,000–2,499,999 (1,750,000) ...................................................................
2,500,000–4,999,999 (3,750,000) ...................................................................
5,000,000–7,499,999 (6,250,000) ...................................................................
7,500,000–9,999,999 (8,750,000) ...................................................................
10,000,000–14,999,999 (12,500,000) .............................................................
$35,288
476,555
562,099
1,368,920
1,458,506
1,092,514
802,998
1,147,140
$26,466
357,416
421,574
1,026,690
1,093,880
819,386
602,248
860,355
$1,512
20,424
24,090
58,668
62,507
46,822
34,414
49,163
$63,267
854,394
1,007,762
2,454,278
2,614,893
1,958,722
1,439,660
2,056,658
Total ..........................................................................................................
6,944,020
5,208,015
297,600
12,449,635
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
40316
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
We next calculate the cost per broker
and assess whether it is a significant
impact. To calculate the cost per broker
for each size category, we simply divide
the total cost for the category from Table
10 by the number of brokers in it. Then
we compare the cost per broker by the
revenue per broker (again using the
midpoint for each range) to assess
whether the costs significant. The
results are presented in Table 11. As
shown, the costs are about 0.4 percent
of revenue. CBP does not consider this
to be significant.
TABLE 11—COSTS PER BROKER IN 2021
Estimated
number
of brokers
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Annual revenue ($)
(midpoint)
Total cost
Cost per
broker
Cost to
revenue ratio
<100,000 (50,000) ...........................................................................................
100,000–499,999 (300,000) ............................................................................
500,000–999,999 (750,000) ............................................................................
1,000,000–2,499,999 (1,750,000) ...................................................................
2,500,000–4,999,999 (3,750,000) ...................................................................
5,000,000–7,499,999 (6,250,000) ...................................................................
7,500,000–9,999,999 (8,750,000) ...................................................................
10,000,000–14,999,999 (12,500,000) .............................................................
323
727
343
358
178
80
42
42
$63,267
854,394
1,007,762
2,454,278
2,614,893
1,958,722
1,439,660
2,056,658
$195.87
1,175.23
2,938.08
6,855.53
14,690.41
24,484.02
34,277.63
48,968.04
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
Total ..........................................................................................................
2,093
12,449,635
5,948.22
........................
In summary, this proposed rule would
affect a substantial number of importers
and brokers. However, the costs do not
rise to the level of economic
significance. Therefore, CBP certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
CBP welcomes comments on this
conclusion and any additional data.
prescribe and approve regulations
relating to customs revenue functions
on behalf of the Secretary of the
Treasury for when the subject matter is
not listed as provided by Treasury
Department Order No. 100–16.
Accordingly, this proposed rule to
amend such regulations may be signed
by the Secretary of Homeland Security
(or his or her delegate).
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
valid control number assigned by OMB.
The collections of information and
recordkeeping requirements related to
this NPRM will be submitted for
approval by OMB under a revision and
extension of collection number 1651–
0034 (CBP Regulations Pertaining to
Customs Brokers). The likely
respondents are importers and customs
brokers.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 111
Customs Brokers Verification Burden
Number of Respondents: 121,667.
Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Total Number of Responses: 121,667.
Time per Response: 2 hours.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 243,334.
The estimated total annual burden
associated with the collection of
information in this NPRM is 243,334
hours.
VII. Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(b)(1),
which provides that the Secretary of the
Treasury delegated to the Secretary of
Homeland Security the authority to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
Administrative practice and
procedure, Brokers, Penalties, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, CBP
proposes to amend 19 CFR part 111 as
set forth below:
PART 111—CUSTOMS BROKERS
1. The general authority citation for
part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1624, 1641.
*
■
*
*
*
*
2. Add § 111.43 to read as follows:
§ 111.43
Importer identity verification.
(a) Scope. This section sets forth the
minimum requirements for importer
and nonresident importer clients to
provide information and for customs
brokers to collect, verify, and maintain
information about the identities of their
resident and nonresident importer
clients. The customs broker must collect
certain information from the importer
client when the importer client provides
the customs broker with a power of
attorney and the customs broker must
verify all of the information collected
before the broker may transact customs
business on behalf of that client.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(b) Definitions. (1) Importer and
nonresident importer. For purposes of
this section, ‘‘importer’’ is defined as
one of the parties qualifying as an
importer of record under 19 U.S.C.
1484(a)(2)(B). ‘‘Nonresident importer’’ is
defined as an importer of record that is
not a citizen of the United States or an
alien lawfully admitted for permanent
residence in the United States; or a
partnership, corporation, or other
commercial entity that is not organized
under the laws of a jurisdiction within
the customs territory of the United
States (as such term is defined in
General Note 2 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States) or in the
Virgin Islands of the United States.
(2) Client. For purposes of this
section, the ‘‘client’’ is defined as the
importer or nonresident importer of
record who is seeking or employing the
services of a customs broker to transact
customs business on behalf of the
importer or nonresident importer of
record.
(3) Grantor. For purposes of this
section, the ‘‘grantor’’ is defined as the
individual executing the power of
attorney on behalf of the client.
(c) Minimum information that the
customs broker must collect from the
client. The customs broker must collect,
at minimum, the following information,
if applicable, from the client to allow
the customs broker to verify the client’s
identity when the customs broker, as
required by § 141.46 of this chapter,
obtains a power of attorney:
(1) The client’s name;
(2) For a client who is an individual,
the client’s date of birth;
(3) For a client that is a partnership,
corporation, or association, the grantor’s
date of birth;
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(4) For a client that is a partnership,
corporation, or association, the client’s
trade or fictitious names;
(5) The address of the client’s
physical location (for a client that is a
partnership, corporation, or association,
the physical location would be the
client’s headquarters) and telephone
number;
(6) The client’s email address and
business website;
(7) A copy of the grantor’s unexpired
government-issued photo identification;
(8) The client’s Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) number, employer
identification number (EIN), or importer
of record (IOR) number;
(9) The client’s publicly available
business identification number;
(10) A recent credit report;
(11) A copy of the client’s business
registration and license with state
authorities; and
(12) The grantor’s authorization to
execute power of attorney on behalf of
client.
(d) Verification of information by
customs broker. Before transacting
customs business on behalf of a client,
the customs broker must authenticate
the client’s identity by verifying all the
information collected from the client
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
The customs broker must verify all the
information collected from the client or
the inapplicability of the information to
that client. The customs broker also
must check to determine whether the
client is named as a sanctioned or
restricted person or entity by the U.S.
Government, or if the client is
suspended or debarred from doing
business with the U.S. Government. The
means of verification are at the customs
broker’s discretion; however, the broker
must use as many of the recommended
verification means as necessary to be
reasonably certain as to the client’s
identity. These means include:
(1) A check of the appropriate
websites to determine whether the
client is named as a sanctioned or
restricted person or entity by the U.S.
Government, or if the client is
suspended or debarred from doing
business with the U.S. Government;
(2) An in-person review of the
grantor’s government-issued photo
identification;
(3) An in-person client meeting;
(4) An in-person visit of the client’s
place of business;
(5) A review of the client’s Articles of
Incorporation;
(6) A query of publicly available
information, business information and
credit reporting entities, Federal, state,
and local databases or websites and any
other relevant trade or business sources.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Aug 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
(e) Establishment of policies,
procedures and internal controls. All
customs brokers must implement
policies, procedures, and internal
controls to identify and verify a client’s
identity before transacting customs
business on behalf of that client. The
policies, procedures, and internal
controls must also fulfill the
recordkeeping requirements in
paragraph (f) of this section, particularly
the requirement for updating
information and records, and reverifying
the client’s identity.
(f) Recordkeeping. All customs
brokers must make, retain, and update
records containing the required
information used to identify and to
verify the client’s identity.
(1) Identification records. At a
minimum, customs brokers must retain
any information collected pursuant to
paragraph (c) of this section, including
any identifying information presented to
the customs broker, as well as any
certifications the client has made.
(2) Verification records. At a
minimum, customs brokers must retain
descriptions of any documents relied
upon, any non-documentary methods
relied upon, any results of measures
undertaken, and any resolution of
discrepancies used to verify the client’s
identity as required by paragraph (d) of
this section. The verification records
must indicate which information
collected pursuant to paragraph (c) was
verified, who performed the
verification, and the date the
verification was performed.
(3) Compliance with other
recordkeeping provisions. All customs
brokers must comply with the
recordkeeping provisions of this part,
part 141 of this chapter, and part 163 of
this chapter. The identification and
verification records must be retained
and made available upon request for
CBP examination in accordance with
parts 111, 141, and 163 of this chapter.
The required retention period for the
identification and verification records is
the same period as is required for a
power of attorney in §§ 111.23 and
163.4 of this chapter.
(4) Updating information. All customs
brokers must implement procedures to
update the records required in this
section and to reverify the information
collected from the client pursuant to the
procedures set forth in paragraph (d)
annually to ensure that the information
is accurate, timely, and complete.
(g) Penalties for noncompliance.
Failure to collect, verify, secure, retain,
update, or make available for inspection
the information required in this section
is grounds for a monetary penalty to be
assessed against the customs broker not
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40317
to exceed $10,000 per client in
accordance with 19 U.S.C.
1641(d)(2)(A), or revocation or
suspension of the customs broker’s
license or permit in accordance with 19
U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(B).
(h) Timing of verifications. (1)
Prospective clients. For all prospective
clients, customs brokers must verify the
information required in this section
before the customs broker may begin to
transact customs business on behalf of
that client. The customs broker must
comply with all the requirements in this
section for that client including
updating all records and information.
(2) Existing clients. For existing
clients with a power of attorney issued
by a partnership, customs brokers must,
within two years of the final rule being
effective, update and verify the
information required in this section. For
all other existing clients, customs
brokers must, within three years of the
final rule being effective, update and
verify the information required in this
section. By these dates, the customs
broker must have complied with all the
requirements in this section, including
the updating of all records and
information, and must continue to
comply.
(3) Reverification. Reverification must
occur annually after the initial
verification required by this section.
Dated: August 6, 2019.
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–17179 Filed 8–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–130700–14]
RIN 1545–BM41
Classification of Cloud Transactions
and Transactions Involving Digital
Content
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations regarding the
classification of cloud transactions for
purposes of the international provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code. These
proposed regulations also modify the
rules for classifying transactions
involving computer programs, including
by applying the rules to transfers of
digital content.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40302-40317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17179]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 111
[USCBP-2019-0024]
RIN 1651-AB17
Customs Broker Verification of an Importer's Identity
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to amend the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to require customs brokers to collect
certain information from importers to enable the customs brokers to
verify the identity of importers, including nonresident importers. CBP
proposes these amendments, pursuant to section 116 of the Trade
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA), which directs
CBP to promulgate regulations to require brokers to verify the identity
of the importers who are their clients.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number, by one
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments via Docket No. USCBP-
2019-0024.
Mail: Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 90 K
Street NE, 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading of the
[[Page 40303]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments
may be inspected during regular business days between the hours of 9
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, 90 K Street NE, 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by
calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325-0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Mitchell, Director, Commercial
Operations Revenue Entry Division, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 202-325-6532, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of this
proposed rule. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also invites
comments that relate to the economic, environmental, or federalism
effects that might result from this regulatory change. Comments that
will provide the most assistance to CBP will reference a specific
portion of the rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include data, information or authority that support such recommended
change. See ADDRESSES above for information on how to submit comments.
II. Background
Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1641),
provides that individuals and business entities must hold a valid
customs broker's license and permit in order to transact customs
business on behalf of others. The statute also sets forth standards for
the issuance of broker's licenses and permits, provides for
disciplinary action against brokers in the form of suspension or
revocation of such licenses and permits or assessment of monetary
penalties, and provides for the assessment of monetary penalties
against other persons for conducting customs business without the
required broker's license. Section 641 authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury to prescribe rules and regulations relating to the customs
business of brokers as may be necessary to protect importers and the
revenue of the United States and to carry out the provisions of section
641.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Homeland Security Act of 2002 generally transferred the
functions of the U.S. Customs Service from the Treasury Department
to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). See
Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2142. The Act provides that the Secretary
of the Treasury retains customs revenue functions unless delegated
to the Secretary of DHS. The regulation of customs brokers is
encompassed within the customs revenue functions set forth in
section 412 of the Homeland Security Act. On May 15, 2003, the
Secretary of the Treasury delegated authority related to the customs
revenue functions to the Secretary of DHS subject to certain
exceptions. See Treasury Order No. 100-16 (Appendix to 19 CFR part
0). Since the authority to prescribe the rules and regulations
related to customs brokers is not listed as one of the exceptions,
this authority now resides with the Secretary of DHS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulations issued under the authority of section 641 are set
forth in part 111 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
(19 CFR part 111). Customs brokers serve many functions when acting on
behalf of their clients, which include resident and nonresident
importers. Customs brokers file information about their clients'
merchandise and transactions with CBP. Customs brokers also track
shipments, pay duties and fees to CBP, and keep current documents and
records about the business they transact on behalf of their clients,
all to help their clients comply with Federal import and export laws.
See 19 CFR part 111 subpart C.
However, before a customs broker may transact customs business on
behalf of a client, the broker must obtain a valid power of attorney
(POA). 19 CFR 141.46. A POA authorizes the customs broker to become
that client's agent and to prepare and file the necessary customs
documents on their behalf.
A. Current POA Regulations
In the customs broker context, a valid POA is the written
appointment of the broker as the true and lawful agent of the principal
(i.e., client) allowed to transact customs business on behalf of the
principal. The regulations governing POAs are set forth in 19 CFR part
141 subpart C.
A POA may be executed for a specified part of the principal's
business (limited power of attorney) or all of the principal's customs
business (general power of attorney). See 19 CFR 141.31(a). Pursuant to
19 CFR 141.32, POAs can be executed through various means. CBP Form
5291 may be used to establish a power of attorney. If CBP Form 5291 is
not used, a limited POA must be executed in the same manner and as
explicit in its terms as CBP Form 5291. 19 CFR 141.32. A general POA
with unlimited authority may be executed in any format. See 19 CFR
141.32.
A POA issued by a partnership is limited to a period not to exceed
two years from the date of execution. 19 CFR 141.34. All other POAs may
be granted for an unlimited period of time. 19 CFR 141.34.
A valid POA requires the principal to provide only limited
information. The principal is required to provide:
(1) A statement from the principal authorizing the customs broker
to act as the principal's agent and for the customs broker to file
entry/entry summary in the principal's name for a shipment;
(2) The name of the individual or the authorized representative of
the sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation executing the POA;
and
(3) The name and address of the individual or business on whose
behalf the POA is being executed.
See 19 CFR 141.32; 141.36-.39.
B. Customs Brokers' Current Practice for Verifying Importer's Identity
While only a limited amount of information is required for a valid
POA, the majority of customs brokers currently require additional
information when a POA is obtained from an importer, which is used by
the broker to verify the importer's existence and identity. Brokers
require this additional information and have initiated processes and
procedures to validate an importer's identity in order to protect the
broker's business interests, reduce identity theft, and help to prevent
the use of shell \2\ or shelf \3\ companies to further a business fraud
scheme. Additional information that a broker might request includes,
but is not limited to, the registration of the importer's business with
a state government and the Articles of Incorporation under which that
business is formed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A shell company is a company without active business
operations or significant assets, which may be used illegitimately
to disguise business ownership or operations.
\3\ A shelf company is a company which was created and
maintained by legal means, but is left dormant for a period of time
before its sale to a buyer, which may serve to conceal the buyer's
identity and history of business transactions so as not to appear as
a new business entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP provides non-binding guidance on how brokers can validate
importers when they obtain a POA. For example, CBP recommends that a
broker should, whenever possible, do the following: \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See U.S. Customs and Border Protection, ``Validating the
Power of Attorney'' for comprehensive list of recommendations. Last
published May 25, 2018. Available at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/customs-brokers/validating-power-attorney.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 40304]]
(1) Complete POAs in-person and review personal identification
(driver's license, passport, etc.);
(2) Check applicable websites to verify the business registration
with State authorities;
(3) Confirm business's trade or fictitious names that may appear on
the POA;
(4) Verify that the importer's name, importer number, and Employer
Identification Number (EIN) (also known as the Federal Tax
Identification Number) on the POA match what is in CBP's Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE);
(5) Check whether an importer is named as a sanctioned or
restricted person or entity by the U.S. Government.
Since the collection and verification of any additional information
from the importer is voluntary, certain brokers do not require any
additional information. As a result, an atmosphere of ``broker
shopping'' has been created where an importer that does not wish to
provide this additional information might refuse to provide the
information to one broker in the hopes that another broker will not ask
for that information. If the second broker does not request the
additional information, that broker, with minimal knowledge about the
importer, transacts customs business on the importer's behalf leading
to the possible use of shell or shelf companies, revenue loss,
increased security risks with the goods being imported into the United
States, and an uneven playing field for brokers.
C. Section 116 of TFTEA
On February 24, 2016, Congress enacted the Trade Facilitation and
Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA), Section 116, Public Law 114-125,
130 Stat. 122 (19 U.S.C. 4301 note), which amended section 641 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1641). Section 116 of TFTEA, Customs
Broker Identification of Importers, specifically requires the Secretary
to promulgate regulations setting minimum standards to: (1) Identify
the information that an importer, including a nonresident importer, is
required to submit to a customs broker and that a broker is required to
collect in order to verify the identity of the importer; (2) identify
reasonable procedures that a broker is required to follow in order to
verify the authenticity of the information collected from the importer;
and (3) require the broker to maintain records of the information
collected by the broker used to substantiate the importer's identity.
Section 116 also empowers the Secretary to assess a monetary penalty
for each violation for a broker that fails to collect the information,
as well as revoke or suspend the license or permit of the broker.
III. Discussion of Proposed Amendments
CBP proposes to amend the CBP regulations to standardize the
process by which customs brokers verify the identity of their clients,
specifically importers and nonresident importers. These proposed
regulations illuminate, for the international trade community and the
public in general, the important role customs brokers have in verifying
prospective clients and in ensuring the quality and integrity of the
information they keep. When brokers verify the bona fides of clients,
CBP is better assured that importers are conducting legitimate trade
transactions. By formalizing the verification process and requiring
that a reverification process be carried out by brokers every year, CBP
believes that a broker's knowledge of its importer client would be
improved. This improved broker knowledge could allow for commercial
fraud prevention and revenue protection and help prevent the use of
shell or shelf companies by importers who attempt to evade the customs
laws of the United States. Preventing the use of shell or shelf
companies by importers would help reduce instances of a
misclassification of merchandise to avoid duties, protect against
intellectual property rights (IPR) violations, reduce antidumping/
countervailing duty (AD/CVD) infractions, and reduce the importation of
unsafe merchandise.
As the importer's and nonresident importer's agent, the customs
broker is uniquely situated to collect the information necessary to
authenticate their identity. CBP has determined that it is most
efficient for the broker to collect and verify this information at the
time the POA is obtained because the broker must both verify the
client's identity and obtain a valid POA before transacting customs
business on behalf of the client.
CBP is proposing to add a new section, 111.43, entitled Importer
identity verification, to title 19 of the CFR to establish the identity
collection criteria and to create a required verification process of
importer and nonresident importer clients. These proposed regulations
set forth the minimum requirements a customs broker must meet to verify
the importer's identity prior to transacting customs business on behalf
of the importer or nonresident importer client. As discussed above,
most customs brokers already meet or exceed these minimum requirements.
Customs brokers may continue to exceed the requirements in proposed
section 111.43, regarding the collection of information and documents,
or conducting research about a client.
Proposed paragraph (a) describes the general scope of the
requirements for customs brokers to collect, verify, and maintain the
information necessary to authenticate the identity of their clients.
Proposed paragraph (b) provides definitions for this section. In
accordance with section 116(a)(i)(4) of TFTEA, the term ``importer'' is
defined as one of the parties that qualifies to be an importer of
record under 19 U.S.C. 1484(a)(2)(B) and ``nonresident importer'' is
defined as an importer of record that is not a citizen of the United
States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the
United States; or a partnership, corporation, or other commercial
entity that is not organized under the laws of a jurisdiction within
the customs territory of the United States (as such term is defined in
General Note 2 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States)
or in the Virgin Islands of the United States.\5\ The definition of the
term ``client'' is the importer or nonresident importer of record who
is seeking or employing the services of a customs broker to transact
customs business on behalf of the importer or nonresident importer of
record. The definition of the term ``grantor'' is the individual
executing the power of attorney on behalf of the client.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ We note that the definition for ``nonresident importer''
provided by Congress in section 116 of TFTEA differs from the
definition of ``nonresident'' in 19 CFR 141.31 governing POAs. CBP
does not discuss these differences in this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) because the differing definitions of ``resident''
and ``nonresident'' in 19 CFR part 141 do not influence whether a
broker is required to obtain a POA from a client on behalf of which
it transacts customs business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Minimum Information That the Customs Broker Is Required To Collect
From the Client
Proposed paragraph (c) of section 111.43 identifies the information
that the customs broker is required to collect from the client at the
time the POA is obtained by the broker. The broker collects this
information to verify the client's identity.
At the time the POA is obtained by the broker, the broker must
collect, at a minimum, the following information from the client, if
applicable:
(1) The client's name;
(2) For a client who is an individual, the client's date of birth;
[[Page 40305]]
(3) For a client that is a partnership, corporation, or
association, the grantor's date of birth;
(4) For a client that is a partnership, corporation, or
association, the client's trade or fictitious names;
(5) The address of the client's physical location (for a client
that is a partnership, corporation, or association, the physical
location would be the client's headquarters) and telephone number;
(6) The client's email address and business website;
(7) A copy of the grantor's unexpired government-issued photo
identification;
(8) The client's Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number, employer
identification number (EIN), or importer of record (IOR) number;
(9) The client's publicly available business identification number
(e.g., Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number, etc.);
(10) A recent credit report;
(11) A copy of the client's business registration and license with
state authorities; and
(12) The grantor's authorization to execute power of attorney on
behalf of client.
The broker must collect all the information that is applicable to
that particular client. Some information might not be applicable to a
client depending on whether the client is an individual, partnership,
corporation, or association. For example, a small business might not
have a business website; or a client who is an individual would not
have a business registration and license with state authorities or a
publicly available business identification number. Additionally, if
certain foreign jurisdictions do not provide credit reports, the broker
is not required to collect a recent credit report from that client.
Under current practice, most brokers already collect all of the
above applicable information from the client in the ordinary course of
business. Most brokers currently require this information to ensure
that the client is not concealing his or her identity, misusing another
business owner's identity, or using a shell or shelf corporation to
further a business fraud scheme. By requiring all of the applicable
information above from all of the broker's clients, the proposed rule
would also eliminate the ability of prospective clients to ``broker
shop.''
B. Procedures That a Customs Broker Is Required To Perform To Verify
the Information Collected
CBP is proposing procedures for a customs broker to use to verify
the authenticity of the information collected from its clients.
Proposed paragraph (d) of section 111.43 requires customs brokers to
verify all the information collected from the client, under proposed
paragraph (c), to ensure accurate identification of the client.
As explained in Section A. above, the broker must collect all the
information set forth in proposed paragraph (c) that is applicable to
that client. The broker would be required to verify each of the data
points (i.e. client's name, address, etc.) that the broker collects
from that particular client. The means of verification that the customs
broker uses for each data point, however, are at the broker's
discretion. There are various methods of verification that would
satisfy CBP's requirement that the broker verify each data point that
the broker collects. The means of verification that CBP recommends for
each data point are set forth below and include in-person verification,
review of the proper evidence of the grantor's authorization to execute
the POA, and/or research performed using various federal agency, state
government, and publicly available data sources. The broker must use as
many of the recommended verification means as necessary to be
reasonably certain of the client's identity.
In addition to verifying each data point collected, the broker
would be required to check if the client is a sanctioned or restricted
person or entity, or if the client is suspended or debarred from doing
business with the U.S. Government.
Under the proposed rule, for any prospective client, the customs
broker would be required to perform this verification before
transacting customs business on the client's behalf. For existing
clients with a POA issued by a partnership, brokers would have two
years to verify this information and three years for all other existing
clients.
1. The Client's Name, Address, Telephone Number, Email Address,
Business Website, Trade or Fictitious Names
A customs broker could verify the client's name, address, telephone
number, email, website, and trade or fictitious names, if applicable,
through various means. A customs broker could use the Automated Broker
Interface (ABI) to access ACE to verify a client's information. This
means of verification is only available for a broker to access an
existing client's information for transactions where the broker
represented the client.
The broker could alternatively check the client's unexpired
government-issued photo identification, the state licensing database or
use open-source mapping. Customs brokers may also conduct research
using reputable business information databases, individual state
databases, and credit reporting entities or any other public or private
database which provides accurate, timely, and relevant information
about the client.
To verify the client's address, the broker could use various
navigation and mapping functions available on public websites to verify
the location. Warning signs could include an incomplete or inaccurate
address, or providing only a post office box address. To verify the
telephone number, the broker could verify whether the number is a
landline as opposed to a cell phone and could use return call
verification to ensure that the number is accurate. To verify the email
address, the broker could ensure that there is a return email message.
If applicable, the broker could visit the client's place of
business in-person to verify its existence and the client's identity.
During this in-person visit, the broker would be looking for any
possible indication that the client's identity is not what he or she
provided; that the business is defunct or nonexistent; or that the
company is a shell or shelf company. To verify a business website, the
broker could check the depth of the website, the business universal
resource locator (URL), and the viability of any links provided.
2. The Client's or Grantor's Date of Birth
There are various ways that a customs broker could verify the
client's or grantor's date of birth. The broker could perform an in-
person review of the client's or grantor's unexpired government-issued
photo identification to verify the date of birth. Alternatively, a
broker could use individual state databases or open-source software.
3. The Grantor's Unexpired Government-Issued Photo Identification
The customs broker can perform an in-person review of the grantor's
unexpired government-issued photo identification such as a passport or
driver's license. During this in-person verification, the broker would
be looking for any possible indications that the grantor's identity is
not what he or she provided, or that there is fraud. Alternatively, the
broker may conduct research using reputable databases to establish the
veracity of the government-issued photo identification.
[[Page 40306]]
4. The Client's IRS Number, EIN, or IOR Number
A customs broker could use federal government databases or the
client's tax forms to verify the client's IRS, EIN, or IOR number. The
broker could also use the ABI to access ACE to verify an existing
client's IRS number, EIN, or IOR number. This means of verification is
only available for a broker to access an existing client's information
for transactions where the broker represented the client.
Alternatively, the broker could conduct research using reputable public
or private databases and websites, such as www.freeerisa.com, which is
a private website that provides free access to all Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA) form 5500s filed with the Department of
Labor over the past two years.
5. The Client's Publicly Available Business Identification Number
If the client provides a non-government issued business identifier,
the broker can use the associated database to verify the relevant
aspects of that client's identification. For example, if the client
provides its DUNS number, the broker could use the Dun and Bradstreet
website at www.DNB.com to verify the client's DUNS number, company
name, address, and telephone number.
6. A Recent Credit Report
To check the client's credit report, the broker would check with a
nationally recognized credit reporting entity. When checking the
client's credit report, warning signs could include declarations of
bankruptcy, and any delayed payment history. If the client informs the
broker that a credit report cannot be provided because its jurisdiction
does not provide credit reports, the broker must verify this by
checking the address of the client's physical location.
7. The Client's Business Registration and License With State
Authorities
A broker could use individual state databases to verify the
business registration and license.
8. The Grantor's Authorization To Execute Power of Attorney on Behalf
of Client
A broker is required to confirm that the grantor has the authority
to execute the POA. When a representative appears on behalf of the
client, the representative would be required to provide evidence of his
or her authorization to sign the POA. This evidence should be notarized
whenever possible; however, the person whose signature is required is
dependent on the type of business. To determine the type of evidence
required, the broker would review the business's public filings, for
example, the articles of incorporation, to determine who holds the key
positions. For a corporation, the evidence would be a corporate officer
providing certification on the entity's letterhead. For a limited
liability company (LLC), the evidence would be the managing partner or
member providing certification on the entity's letterhead. For a
partnership, authorization would be the general and/or managing partner
providing certification on the entity's letterhead. For a sole
proprietorship or individual, evidence of authorization would consist
of a certification, notarized by the sole proprietor or individual,
stating that the representative was authorized to sign on behalf of the
individual or the sole proprietor.
9. Check if the Client is a Sanctioned or Restricted Person or Entity
by the U.S. Government or if the Client is Suspended or Debarred From
Doing Business With the U.S. Government
The broker would be required to check to determine if the client is
a sanctioned or restricted person or entity, or if the client is
suspended or debarred from doing business with the U.S. Government. The
broker could check this information through any of the following
websites: www.sam.gov, a U.S. government website that may be used to
search public records for company registrations; https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Pages/default.aspx, which is
a U.S. Department of Treasury website identifying Office of Foreign
Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned companies and individuals; or https://build.export.gov/main/ecr/eg_main_023148, which is a consolidated
screening list identifying entities that have been sanctioned by U.S.
Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration.
C. Requirement To Implement Policies, Procedures and Internal Controls
Proposed paragraph (e) of section 111.43 requires customs brokers
to implement policies, procedures, and internal controls to verify a
client's identity before transacting customs business on behalf of that
client. While most customs brokers already have such policies,
procedures, and internal controls in place to collect and verify this
information, this requirement is to ensure that all brokers implement
these policies, procedures, and internal controls so that brokers are
required to collect the required information from the client, and to
ensure that the broker has established policies and procedures to
verify and reverify the information.
D. Recordkeeping Requirements
Section 116 of TFTEA requires that the regulations also set minimum
standards for customs brokers to maintain records of the information
used to substantiate the client's identity. Accordingly, proposed
paragraph (f) requires all customs brokers to make, retain, and update
records containing the information the brokers collected to verify the
client's identity.
1. Current Recordkeeping Requirements
Customs brokers must make, retain, and update certain records of
their transactions with their clients and must comply with all
recordkeeping requirements. For customs brokers, the relevant
recordkeeping provisions are in part 111 and part 163 and each broker
must comply with the provisions of those parts when maintaining records
that reflect on his or her transactions as a broker. 19 CFR 111.21 and
163.2(d). Part 163 governs the maintenance, production, inspection, and
examination of records, in general. Part 111 sets forth the specific
recordkeeping requirements applicable to customs brokers, and the
additional records that each customs broker must make and maintain, and
make available for CBP examination.
Pursuant to part 111, customs brokers are required to keep current
records of account reflecting all their transactions as a broker, and
keep and maintain copies of all correspondence and other records
relating to their customs business. 19 CFR 111.21. A broker is not
required to file a POA with CBP but must retain the POA as part of his
or her records and make it available to representatives of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).\6\ See 19 CFR 141.46. Customs
brokers must maintain all these records for the required retention
periods, in a manner that allows CBP to readily examine them, and
pursuant to an allowable method of storage. See 19 CFR 111.25 and
163.5. These records, except for POAs, must be retained for at least
five years after the date of entry. See 19 CFR 111.23 and 163.4. POAs
must be retained until
[[Page 40307]]
revoked, and revoked POAs and letters of revocation must be retained
for five years after the date of revocation or for five years after the
date the client ceases to be an ``active client'' as defined in section
111.29(b)(2)(ii), whichever period is later. See 19 CFR 111.23 and
163.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Subpart C of 19 CFR part 111 provides that the POA and other
records must be made available to representatives of the Department
of the Treasury; however, pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of
2002 and Treasury Order No. 100-16 (Appendix to 19 CFR part 0), this
was delegated to representatives of the Secretary of DHS as opposed
to representatives of the Department of the Treasury. See Pub. L.
107-296, 116 Stat. 2142.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed regulations add additional records to 19 CFR part 111
that the customs broker must make, retain, update, and have readily
available for CBP examination.
2. Retention of Identification and Verification Records
Proposed paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of section 111.43 set forth the
minimum identification and verification records that customs brokers
must retain. At a minimum, customs brokers must retain the information
required by proposed paragraph (c), including any identification
records, which consists of the information presented to the broker used
to identify the client as well as any certifications the client makes.
Customs brokers must also retain verification records of the means and
documents relied on to verify the client's identity as required by
proposed paragraph (d) and each record must indicate which information
required pursuant to proposed paragraph (c) was verified by those means
and documents. At a minimum, for the verification records, customs
brokers must retain descriptions of any documents relied upon, any non-
documentary methods, any results of measures undertaken, and any
resolution of discrepancies as well as who performed the verification
and the date the verification was performed. Brokers must indicate in
the verification records which information required pursuant to
proposed paragraph (c) was not collected from the client because it was
inapplicable to that particular client.
3. Records Must Be Readily Available for CBP Examination
The identification and verification records collected by the broker
must be retained in accordance with 19 CFR 111.23 and be made available
upon request by CBP for examination. The period of retention for the
identification and verification records shall be the same as for POAs.
See 19 CFR 111.23 and 163.4.
4. Updating the POA, Identification and Verification Records
Proposed paragraph (f)(4) requires customs brokers to implement
procedures to ensure the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, and
relevancy of any POA and any information about the client. These
procedures must include a requirement that customs brokers update their
records annually with any changes to the client, POA, or the
information in the records, and reverify the client's identity.
The customs broker would update this information with new
information or records received through either the client or through
the broker's independent research. Customs brokers must update their
information on an annual basis about any client and its business to
ensure that the information they have is timely, accurate, complete,
and relevant, and they must reverify the client's identity annually
using the procedures set forth in proposed section 111.43(d). Depending
on the client, maintaining the information could include setting up
news alerts about the client, confirming with a client the accuracy of
information, or setting up automatic searches in specific databases.
This ensures the quality and integrity of the information in the POA,
and in the identification and verification records.
E. Penalties for Failure To Meet the Requirements
Section 116 of TFTEA amended section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1641) to authorize the Secretary, at his or her discretion,
to hold any customs broker liable if the broker fails to collect the
required information for a monetary penalty not to exceed $10,000 for
each violation and to revoke or suspend a license or permit of the
customs broker pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 641(d).
Further, it holds that the penalty shall be assessed in the same manner
and under the same procedures as the monetary penalties provided for in
section 641(d)(2)(A). See 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(A). The provisions
relating to assessment of a monetary penalty under sections 641(b)(6)
and (d)(2)(A), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(6) and
(d)(2)(A)), are set forth in 19 CFR 111, subpart E.
Proposed paragraph (g) sets forth the conditions under which CBP
may assess a monetary penalty and the maximum amount that a penalty may
be assessed for. CBP may, at its discretion, assess a monetary penalty
for a broker's failure to collect, verify, secure, retain, update, or
make available for inspection the information in this section in an
amount not to exceed $10,000 per client. CBP could also choose to
revoke or suspend the customs broker's license or permit in accordance
with 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(B).
F. Timing of Verifications
Proposed paragraph (h) of section 111.43 provides the different
timing requirements for verifications based on whether it is a
prospective or existing client. This is to allow customs brokers that
are not already collecting, verifying, and maintaining the information,
additional time to start complying with the requirements for existing
clients.
For prospective clients, customs brokers would be required to
comply with proposed 19 CFR 111.43 as of the effective date of the
final rule. A customs broker would not be permitted to begin
transacting customs business on behalf of that client until the broker
collected the required information and verified the client's identity.
The broker would also be required to reverify the client's identity on
an annual basis.
For existing clients with a POA issued by a partnership, customs
brokers would have two years from the effective date of the final rule
to verify the client's identity, and to update the necessary
identification and verification records. This is because, as discussed
above, unlike all other POAs, a POA issued by a partnership is limited
to a period not to exceed two years from the date of execution. See 19
CFR 141.34. Brokers would have to reverify the client's identity on an
annual basis after the initial verification.
For all other existing clients, customs brokers would have three
years from the effective date of the final rule to verify the client's
identity, and to update the necessary identification and verification
records. The three-year period is to allow brokers adequate time to
verify existing client's identities pursuant to the new regulatory
requirements taking into account the number of existing POAs and the
number of hours per existing POA that the verification process will
take (see Section IV. Executive Orders 13563, 12866, and 13771 for more
detailed information). Brokers would have to reverify the client's
identity on an annual basis after the initial verification.
IV. Executive Orders 13563, 12866, and 13771
Executive Orders 13563 (``Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review'') and 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') direct
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
[[Page 40308]]
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs'') directs agencies to reduce regulation and control regulatory
costs and provides that ``for every one new regulation issued, at least
two prior regulations be identified for elimination, and that the cost
of planned regulations be prudently managed and controlled through a
budgeting process.''
This rule is not designated a ``significant regulatory action''
under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. As this rule
is not a significant regulatory action, it is exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled
``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled `Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017). The
regulatory amendments in this rule are the result of the Trade
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA) (Pub. L. 114-
125). This rule's annualized net regulatory cost is $11.7 million using
a 7 percent discount rate and 2017 U.S. dollars. CBP has prepared the
following analysis to help inform stakeholders of the impacts of this
proposed rule.
1. Need and Purpose of Rule
CBP is one of several agencies that are responsible for issuing
regulations governing the importation of goods into the United States.
As this process is complex and involves compliance with numerous
requirements ranging from agricultural safety to intellectual property
rights, to the payment of appropriate duties and fees, CBP licenses
customs brokers to assist importers with the importation process. As
brokers are knowledgeable about the legal requirements and often have a
great deal of visibility into their clients' businesses, they are key
partners to CBP in preventing fraud and ensuring that the correct
amount of revenue is collected. However, brokers' knowledge of their
importer clients can vary as there is no current requirement that
standardizes the collection and verification of broker's information
about their clients. Most brokers verify their clients' information
prior to conducting business with them, even absent a requirement to do
so, but some do not and there is no universal standard for this
verification. CBP has for many years provided guidance on this matter,
but it is non-binding, and not all brokers follow it. We note that
CBP's guidance closely follows industry best practice standards that
many brokers have been following for years and CBP's guidance
standardizes and publicizes the best practices. CBP does not have
evidence indicating the guidance changed industry's behavior. As such,
brokers who properly verify their importers impose a higher burden on
themselves and their clients than brokers who do not properly verify
their clients. Also, importers who intend to commit fraud or are
otherwise reluctant to share their information likely gravitate toward
brokers who do not thoroughly verify their clients' information. This
puts brokers who properly verify importers' identities at a competitive
disadvantage and makes it easier for fraudulent importers to remain
undetected.
Section 116, Customs Broker Identification of Importers, of TFTEA
requires CBP to prescribe regulations governing the customs broker
identification of importers. This proposed rule would satisfy this
requirement by setting minimum standards for importers to provide the
information and for customs brokers to collect this information and
verify the identity of their importer or nonresident importer clients.
The definition of the term ``client'' is the importer or nonresident
importer of record who is seeking or employing the services of a
customs broker to transact customs business on behalf of the importer
or nonresident importer of record. The definition of the term
``grantor'' is the individual executing the power of attorney on behalf
of the client. This regulation would reduce fraud by helping to
eliminate the use of shell or shelf companies, protect U.S. Government
revenue, and ensure level competitiveness among brokers.
2. Background
Each year, approximately 350,000 importers actively transact
customs business with CBP through one of approximately 2,093 permitted
customs brokers.\7\ By regulation, each importer is required to have a
Power of Attorney (POA) with the broker before the broker may transact
customs business on behalf of the client. In addition to assisting the
importer with its filings, the broker has an important function in
preventing fraud. As an importer's agent and CBP-licensed entity, the
broker is uniquely situated to verify specific data on its importer and
nonresident importer clients. The most timely and efficient way for a
broker to request identity-verifying information is to do so at the
point of the POA development. A valid POA is the written appointment of
the broker as the true and lawful agent of the principal (i.e., client)
allowed to transact ``customs business'' in the name of that principal.
The broker's own professional business interest and continuing
obligation to demonstrate reasonable care involves determining that a
POA is valid. Currently, the information required for a valid POA is
limited to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch, Office of Trade [hereinafter referred to as CBP's Broker
Management Branch], on August 15, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) A statement from the principal authorizing the broker to act as
the principal's agent and for the customs broker to file entry/entry
summary in the principal's name for a shipment;
(2) The name of the individual or authorized representative of the
sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation executing the POA; and
(3) The name and address of the individual or business on whose
behalf the POA is being executed.
As noted previously, the vast majority of customs brokers verify
their clients' identity and industry groups have established best
practices for doing so over the years. While there is no current
requirement for brokers to verify their client's information prior to
transacting customs business on their behalf and only a limited amount
of information is required for a valid POA, the majority of brokers
currently require importers to provide them with certain additional
information when a POA is obtained from an importer, which is used by
the broker to verify the importer's existence and identity. This
includes, but is not limited to, the registration of the importer's
business with a state government and the Articles of Incorporation
under which that business is formed. As this validation is important to
prevent fraud and to protect a broker's business interests, CBP
provides non-binding guidance on how brokers can validate importers
when they obtain a POA. For example, CBP recommends that a broker
should, whenever possible, do the following: \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Source: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, ``Validating the
Power of Attorney.'' Last published May 25, 2018. Available at
https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/customs-brokers/validating-power-attorney. Accessed May 31, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Complete POAs in-person and review personal identification
(driver's license, passport, etc.);
(2) Check applicable websites to verify the business registration
with State authorities;
[[Page 40309]]
(3) Confirm business's trade or fictitious names that may appear on
the POA;
(4) Verify that the importer's name, importer number, and Employer
Identification Number (EIN) (also known as the Federal Tax
Identification Number) on the POA match what is in CBP's Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE); and
(5) Check whether an importer is named as a sanctioned or
restricted person or entity by the U.S. Government.
This proposed rule standardizes the process by which brokers verify
the identities of their importer clients by requiring that the broker
collect specified identity-verifying information from the client at the
time the POA is obtained and mandating procedures for the broker to
verify the importer client's identity. Since CBP has determined that it
is most efficient for brokers to collect this information and verify at
the time the POA is obtained, this analysis uses the number of POAs
created and existing to determine when the importer client's identity
must be verified pursuant to this proposed rule's requirements.
According to CBP's Broker Management Branch and conversations with
members of the trade community, including one of the major broker
associations and some individual brokers, for the vast majority--about
95 percent--of POAs obtained by brokers, the broker has sufficiently
verified the importer client's identity, a process that takes about 2
hours per POA.\9\ The 2 hour time burden can be divided into four major
categories which include time for recordkeeping. Brokers who
sufficiently verify their clients' identity spend approximately 40
minutes to check state or local business status via appropriate
channels, 20 minutes to check their clients' business profile via
organizations such as Dun and Bradstreet,\10\ 40 minutes to access and
review credit reports, and 20 minutes for internet research on the
client's company. CBP requests comment on these estimates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on August 15, 2017, and numerous conversations with the trade
in August 2017. The exact percentage of customs brokers that do not
properly verify importers and nonresident importer clients is
unknowable, as no broker will readily admit that it is not
adequately verifying importer and nonresident importer information.
\10\ Source: Dun and Bradstreet. Get a Dun & Bradstreet DUNS
number. https://www.dnb.com/duns-number/get-a-duns.html. Accessed
March 28, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP estimates that approximately 100,000 new POAs are created
annually when an importer either enters into a relationship with a
broker for the first time or the particulars of the POA change and a
new one is needed.\11\ Therefore, CBP estimates that brokers currently
spend approximately 190,000 hours per year validating 95 percent of the
importer clients' identities at the time the POA is obtained. It also
takes time for importers to provide their information to their brokers
for a POA and the additional information required to verify the
client's identity. Based on conversations with the trade community, CBP
expects that it would take each importer approximately 1 hour to
provide the broker with this verifying information. Accordingly, CBP
estimates that importers currently spend approximately 95,000 hours per
year gathering the necessary information to complete a POA and the
additional information required to verify the client's identity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on August 16, 2017, and March 27, 2018. The actual number of
new POAs varies each year. In 2015, there were 84,520 new POAs, in
2016 there were 101,945, and in 2017 there were 101,110.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Impacts of Rule
CBP proposes to formalize the process by which customs brokers
verify importers and nonresident importer clients. This proposed rule
would require the broker to collect specified information from the
importer client and for the broker to verify the information from
importers before it begins working under a new POA allowing the broker
to transact customs business on behalf of the client.\12\ In addition,
within three years of the effective date of this proposed rule being
finalized,\13\ brokers would also need to verify this information from
existing clients.\14\ Additionally, brokers must continue to make and
retain identification and verification records. This requirement would
be enforceable according to the recordkeeping requirements of current
broker regulations in 19 CFR part 111 and part 163. Finally, brokers
will now be required to reverify the client's identity and update their
records annually with any changes to the client, POA, or information in
the records.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Many brokers currently collect more information than what
this proposed rule requires and they may continue to do so. This
proposed rule simply establishes a minimum threshold of information
that the client must provide and that the broker must verify.
\13\ For any existing client with a POA issued by a partnership,
the broker also must verify the client's identity. Existing clients
with partnership POAs will need to have their identities verified
within two years from the effective date of this proposed rule being
finalized and reverified every year thereafter. However, according
to subject matter experts from CBP's Broker Management Branch,
partnership POAs represent less than 1% of active POAs, though we
lack data on the precise number of partnership POAs. To the extent
partnership POAs are affected, it will increase broker costs by a
small amount because they may require verification sooner than
estimated.
\14\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on May 17, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information that the customs broker would now be required to
collect, at minimum, from the importer client under this proposed rule
is as follows, if applicable:
The client's name;
For a client who is an individual, the client's date of
birth;
For a client that is a partnership, corporation, or
association, the grantor's date of birth;
For a client that is a partnership, corporation, or
association, the client's trade or fictitious names;
The address of the client's physical location (for a
client that is a partnership, corporation, or association, the physical
location would be the client's headquarters) and telephone number;
The client's email address and business website;
A copy of the grantor's unexpired government-issued photo
identification;
The client's Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number,
Employer Identification Number (EIN), or Importer of Record (IOR)
number;
The client's publicly available business identification
number (e.g., DUNS number, etc.);
A recent credit report;
A copy of the client's business registration and license
with state authorities; and
The grantor's authorization to execute power of attorney
on behalf of client.
Importer clients can obtain a DUNS number without cost and already
report their DUNS number on CBP Form 5106. Brokers can verify the DUNS
number online for free. The time it takes to do this is included in the
estimated time to verify an importer client's information.
The broker must collect all the information that is applicable to
that particular client. Some information might not be applicable to a
client depending on whether the client is an individual, partnership,
corporation or association. For example, a small business might not
have a business website; and a client who is an individual would not
have a business registration and license with state authorities or a
publicly available business identification number. Additionally,
certain foreign jurisdictions do not provide credit reports;
accordingly, if the address of
[[Page 40310]]
the client's physical location is located in one of those
jurisdictions, the broker is not required to collect a recent credit
report from that client.
Once customs brokers collect this data from importers and
nonresident importers, brokers would need to check to determine whether
the importer client is named as a sanctioned or restricted person or
entity by the U.S. Government, or if the client is suspended or
debarred from doing business with the U.S. Government, and would need
to verify all the information collected from the importer client using
various federal agency, state government, and publicly available data
sources. The means of verification are at the customs broker's
discretion. The broker must use as many of the recommended verification
means as necessary to be reasonably certain as to the client's
identity. Some of the tools that are recommended for verifying this
information include:
A check of the appropriate websites to determine whether
the client is named as a sanctioned or restricted person or entity by
the U.S. Government, or if the client is suspended or debarred from
doing business with the U.S. Government;
An in-person review of the grantor's unexpired government-
issued identification;
An in-person client meeting;
An in-person visit of the client's place of business;
A review of the client's Articles of Incorporation; and
A query of publicly available information, business
information and credit reporting entities, Federal, state, and local
databases or websites and any other relevant trade or business sources.
As previously stated, conscientious brokers already require
information from the importer or nonresident importer client in order
to verify the client's identity. According to CBP's Broker Management
Branch and conversations with the trade community, for approximately 5
percent of POAs, the brokers do not require most or any of this
additional information and the importer clients' identities are not
currently verified or are only minimally verified.\15\ As a result of
this rule, all brokers will be required to verify all of the specified
information collected from the client to verify the client's existence
and identity for all POAs granted by importers and nonresident importer
clients and this information will need to be reverified annually. CBP
analyzes the costs and benefits of these new requirements over a 5-year
period of analysis spanning from 2019 to 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on August 15, 2017. The exact percentage of customs brokers
that do not properly verify importers and nonresident importer
clients is unknowable because no broker will readily admit that it
is not adequately verifying importer and nonresident importer
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Costs
Costs to Brokers
Brokers currently have approximately 350,000 POAs with importer
clients, for which brokers would now need to verify the client's
identity under this rule within three years of the effective date of
this proposed rule being finalized. CBP assumes that brokers would
verify the importer client's identity for one-third of these existing
POAs each year beginning in 2019--or about 116,666 each year from 2019
to 2021--to satisfy this rule's new verification requirement (see Table
1).\16\ These existing verifications would each take approximately 2
hours and can be divided into four distinct time-burden categories that
were identified earlier.17 18 There is a time cost of $59.52
each, according to CBP's assumed hourly time value for customs brokers
of $29.76.19 20 Based on the historical number of POAs
created each year, CBP estimates that 100,000 new POAs would be created
each year between 2019 and 2023 (see Table 1). CBP estimates that in
the absence of this rule, brokers would have verified 95 percent of the
importer clients' identities for new POAs--or 95,000 POAs--while the
remaining 5 percent--or 5,000--new POAs would have the clients'
identities go unverified based on historical estimates. According to
CBP's Broker Management Branch, this rule's verification requirements
would not increase the time burden for the 95 percent of instances
where brokers verify the importer client's identity for each new POA.
The specific information brokers currently require may be different
than the information required under this rule, but we estimate that it
takes approximately two hours to verify either set of data. As such,
this rule will have no additional time burden to do the initial
validation of the importer client's identity for the POA. The remaining
5 percent of brokers who do not currently verify the client's identity
would incur a two-hour time burden for the verification of the importer
client's identity for a POA under this rule,\21\ at an added time cost
of $59.52 per new POA according to CBP's assumed hourly time value for
customs brokers.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on August 15, 2017.
\17\ The two hours includes the time to implement policies,
procedures and internal controls for identity verification, and to
keep records containing the information used to verify the importer.
\18\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on August 15, 2017.
\19\ 2-hour time burden for broker to verify information of the
client's identity for an existing POA x $29.76 hourly time value for
customs brokers = $59.52 time cost.
\20\ CBP bases the $29.76 hourly time value for customs brokers
on the Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) 2017 median hourly wage
rate for Cargo and Freight Agents ($20.11), which CBP assumes best
represents the wage for brokers, by the ratio of BLS' average 2017
total compensation to wages and salaries for Office and
Administrative Support occupations (1.4801), the assumed
occupational group for brokers, to account for non-salary employee
benefits, and rounded. Source of median wage rate: U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment Statistics, ``May 2017
National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States--
Median Hourly Wage by Occupation Code: 43-5011.'' Updated March 30,
2018. Available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/2017/may/oes_nat.htm#43-0000 . Accessed March 26, 2019. The total compensation to wages and
salaries ratio is equal to the calculated average of the 2017
quarterly estimates (shown under Mar., June, Sep., Dec.) of the
total compensation cost per hour worked for Office and
Administrative Support occupations divided by the calculated average
of the 2017 quarterly estimates (shown under Mar., June, Sep., Dec.)
of wages and salaries cost per hour worked for the same occupation
category. Source of total compensation to wages and salaries ratio
data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation Historical
Listing March 2004-December 2018, ``Table 3. Civilian workers, by
occupational group: Employer costs per hours worked for employee
compensation and costs as a percentage of total compensation, 2004-
2018 by Respondent Type: Office and administrative support
occupations.'' Available at https://www.bls.gov/web/ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed March 26, 2019.
\21\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch in March 2018. The 100,000 figure is a rounded average of the
number of POAs that were filed in 2015 (84,520), 2016 (101,945), and
2017 (101,110).
\22\ 2-hour added time burden for broker to verify information
of the importer's identity for a new POA x $29.76 hourly time value
for customs brokers = $59.52 time cost.
[[Page 40311]]
Table 1--Projected Number of POAs Requiring Broker Verification With Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing POAs New POAs Total POAs
requiring requiring requiring
Year identity- identity- identity-
verification verification verification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019............................................................ 116,667 5,000 121,667
2020............................................................ 116,667 5,000 121,667
2021............................................................ 116,666 5,000 121,667
2022............................................................ 0 5,000 5,000
2023............................................................ 0 5,000 5,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 350,000 25,000 375,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To estimate the total time cost for brokers to verify existing
importer clients' identities, CBP multiplies the projected number of
existing POAs requiring identity-verification during the period of
analysis shown in Table 1 by the $59.52 time cost to complete each
identity-verification of an existing client by measuring the existing
POAs. Accordingly, CBP finds that brokers would incur undiscounted
costs totaling $20.8 million to verify existing clients' identities
from 2019 to 2023 following this rule's implementation (see Table 2).
Brokers who do not already conduct client identity verifications would
sustain a total time cost of $1.5 million for verification of the
importer client's identity based on their $59.52 added time burden and
their projected number of client identities verified measured by the
number of projected POAs over the period of analysis (see Table 1 and
Table 2). Altogether, the total undiscounted cost of this rule to
brokers would measure $22.3 million from 2019 to 2023.
Table 2--Total Cost for Brokers To Verify Client's Identity for Existing and New POAs With Rule
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time
cost for
Time cost to Time cost to brokers to
Year verify verify new verify
existing POAs POAs existing and
new POAs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019............................................................ $6,944,020 $297,600 $7,241,620
2020............................................................ 6,944,020 297,600 7,241,620
2021............................................................ 6,944,020 297,600 7,241,620
2022............................................................ 0 297,600 297,600
2023............................................................ 0 297,600 297,600
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 20,832,000 1,488,000 22,320,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, as a result of this rule, customs brokers will need
to update their records and reverify on an annual basis that the POA
information, and the identification and verification records for their
importer clients is accurate. According to CBP's Broker Management
Branch, there are approximately 350,000 active importers of record
(IORs) in any given year and that is not expected to change
significantly--on average any new IORs are offset by IORs that become
inactive.\23\ Brokers will now have to verify all 350,000 existing
client's identities as measured by the existing POAs within three years
of the effective date of this proposed rule being finalized and
reverify the client's identity annually thereafter. As discussed
earlier, we expect brokers to do the initial verification evenly over
the course of the first three years (see Table 1). The reverifications,
then, will lag the initial verifications by a year. As the new
importers are offset by importers who become inactive, brokers will
need to reverify 350,000 existing clients' identities each year, after
the initial 3-year verification window. Table 3 shows the number of
verifications we estimate for each year. These verifications would each
take approximately 45 minutes (.75 hours) to complete,\24\ at a time
cost of $22.32 each, according to CBP's assumed hourly time value for
customs brokers of $29.76.\25\ Table 3 shows the estimated costs of
this reverification. The total undiscounted cost to verify and update
recordkeeping requirements for existing and prospective clients as
measured by existing and new POAs is $23,436,022 over the period of the
analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on April 12, 2018.
\24\ Source: Email correspondence with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on March 20, 2018.
\25\ 0.75-hour time burden for broker to verify information of
the importer client's identity for an existing POA x $29.76 hourly
time value for customs brokers = $22.32 time cost.
Table 3--Total Cost for Brokers To Verify and Update Recordkeeping
Requirements for Existing and New Clients With Rule
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total POAs
requiring Total time
Year annual cost to
reverification reverify POAs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019.................................... 0 $0
2020.................................... 116,667 2,604,007
2021.................................... 233,334 5,208,015
2022.................................... 350,000 7,812,000
2023.................................... 350,000 7,812,000
-------------------------------
Total................................. 1,050,000 23,436,022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs to Importers
In addition to its costs to brokers, this rule would impose costs
on the broker's existing and prospective importer clients now required
to provide additional identity-verifying data to brokers for their
existing and new POAs. Based on conversations with the trade
[[Page 40312]]
community, CBP assumes that each existing POA corresponds to a unique
importer of record.\26\ As a result, CBP estimates that 350,000
existing importer clients would provide identity-verifying data to
brokers for 350,000 existing POAs within three years of the effective
date of this proposed rule being finalized (see Table 1). CBP expects
that it would take each importer approximately one hour to provide the
broker with this identity-verifying information, at a time cost of
$29.76 according to CBP's assumed hourly time value for importers of
$29.76.27 28 Considering this time cost and the projected
number of existing POAs where the importer's identity must be verified
during the period of analysis (see Table 1), CBP finds that importers
would incur a total cost of $10.4 million to provide identity-verifying
information to their brokers for existing POAs (see Table 4). For new
POAs where the importer's identity must be verified, CBP estimates that
importers already provide most of the additional identity-verifying
information required in this rule to brokers for 95 percent--or
95,000--of new POAs each year. As stated above, while the specific
information brokers require currently may vary, it is generally very
similar to what this rule requires that the brokers collect. Hence, CBP
assumes these importers would not incur an added burden to provide
identity-verifying information to their brokers with this rule beyond
what they already bear. For the remaining 5 percent--or 5,000--of POAs
where the importer's identity is not currently verified, this rule
would require brokers to collect such information from their clients.
Like with existing POAs, CBP believes that it would take each importer
approximately one hour to provide the broker with this identity-
verifying information, at a time cost of $29.76 according to CBP's
assumed hourly time value for importers of $29.76.\29\ By applying this
time cost to the 5,000 new POAs where the importer's identity would not
be verified absent this rule, CBP estimates that some importers would
sustain undiscounted costs totaling $0.7 million over the period of
analysis from this rule's identity-verifying data submission
requirement (see Table 4). In all, this rule would impose undiscounted
costs of $11.2 million on importers between 2019 and 2023, as
illustrated in Table 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Some importers have several importer of record numbers, but
each requires its own POA.
\27\ 1-hour time burden for importer to provide broker with the
required information to verify the importer's identity for an
existing POA x $29.76 hourly time value for importers = $29.76 time
cost.
\28\ CBP bases the $29.76 hourly time value for importers on the
Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) 2017 median hourly wage rate for
Cargo and Freight Agents ($20.11), which CBP assumes best represents
the wage for importers, by the ratio of BLS' average 2017 total
compensation to wages and salaries for Office and Administrative
Support occupations (1.4801), the assumed occupational group for
importers, to account for non-salary employee benefits, and rounded.
Source of median wage rate: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Occupational Employment Statistics, ``May 2017 National Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates, United States--Median Hourly Wage by
Occupation Code: 43-5011.'' Updated March 30, 2018. Available at
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm. Accessed March 26,
2019. The total compensation to wages and salaries ratio is equal to
the calculated average of the 2017 quarterly estimates (shown under
Mar., June, Sep., Dec.) of the total compensation cost per hour
worked for Office and Administrative Support occupations divided by
the calculated average of the 2017 quarterly estimates (shown under
Mar., June, Sep., Dec.) of wages and salaries cost per hour worked
for the same occupation category. Source of total compensation to
wages and salaries ratio data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Employer Costs for Employee Compensation. Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation Historical Listing March 2004-December 2018,
``Table 3. Civilian workers, by occupational group: employer costs
per hours worked for employee compensation and costs as a percentage
of total compensation, 2004-2017 by Respondent Type: Office and
administrative support occupations.'' Available at https://www.bls.gov/web/ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed March 26, 2019.
\29\ 1-hour time burden for importer to provide broker with
information to verify the importer's identity for a new POA x $29.76
hourly time value for importers = $29.76 time cost.
Table 4--Total Cost for Importers To Provide Identity-Verifying Data for Existing and New POAs With Rule
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time
Time cost for cost for
existing Time cost for importers to
importers to new importers provide data
Year provide to provide for
verifying data data for verification
for existing verification of existing
POAs and new POAs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019............................................................ $3,472,010 $148,800 $3,620,810
2020............................................................ 3,472,010 148,800 3,620,810
2021............................................................ 3,471,980 148,800 3,620,810
2022............................................................ 0 148,800 148,800
2023............................................................ 0 148,800 148,800
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 10,416,000 744,000 11,160,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brokers are required to obtain recent credit reports from their
client importers for use in the verification process. We next estimate
the cost of running credit reports to the importer. It is common
practice among businesses to periodically run their own credit report,
so we expect most importers to simply provide the broker with a
previously run credit report. For the purposes of this analysis, we
again assume that 95% of importers are already providing their credit
report to the broker or that they routinely run their own credit report
for their own purposes. There is not a financial cost to these
importers.\30\ The remaining 5 percent or approximately 5,000 importers
will incur a costs by purchasing credit reports with credit scores from
each of the credit bureaus (Equifax, Experian, and Transunion). The
three reports costs approximately $40.\31\ Table 5 shows the costs to
importers working with brokers not currently accessing free credit
reports from their clients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Source: Communication with CBP's Broker Management Branch
on March 23, 2019, and numerous conversations with the trade in
August 2017. During the March 23, 2019 discussion with the Broker
Management Branch, the branch noted that there can be a cost to
brokers for collecting credit reports that range between $35 to $50
depending on the source.
\31\ Source: Experian. Consumer Products. https://www.experian.com/consumer-products/experian-equifax-transunion-credit-report-and-score.html. Accessed March 27, 2019.
[[Page 40313]]
Table 5--Cost of Credit Report for Importers
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New POAs
requiring Credit report
Year identity- costs
verification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019.................................... 5,000 $200,000
2020.................................... 5,000 200,000
2021.................................... 5,000 200,000
2022.................................... 5,000 200,000
2023.................................... 5,000 200,000
-------------------------------
Total................................. 25,000 1,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Costs
Table 6 summarizes the costs of this rule to brokers and importers.
Altogether, this rule would impose a total undiscounted cost of $57.9
million on the trade community from 2019 to 2023.
Table 6--Total Cost of Rule to Brokers and Importers
[Undiscounted 2017 U.S. dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost of
Year importer ID
rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019.................................................... $11,062,430
2020.................................................... 13,666,437
2021.................................................... 16,270,355
2022.................................................... 8,458,400
2023.................................................... 8,458,400
---------------
Total................................................. 57,916,022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
When discounted, as shown in Table 7, this cost would measure $51.4
million in present value and $11.7 million on an annualized basis
(using a 7 percent discount rate and 2017 U.S. dollars).
Table 7--Total Monetized Present Value and Annualized Costs of Rule,
2019-2023
[2017 U.S. dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3% Discount 7% Discount
rate rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Value Cost...................... $54,922,999 $51,403,406
Annualized Cost......................... 11,643,386 11,716,647
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: The estimates in this table are contingent upon CBP's projections
as well as the discount rates applied.
5. Benefits
Most brokers are already verifying the identity of their
prospective clients when they begin their business relationship, but
there are some who do not. Based on conversations with the broker
community, CBP estimates that five percent of importers' identities are
not currently verified or are only minimally verified. Those who do not
wish to be thoroughly verified sometimes ``broker shop'' for a broker
that does not require the same amount of verifying information. While
some importers simply do not want to share more information with their
brokers than is required, others intend to commit fraud and import
illicit and/or counterfeit goods into the United States. These
fraudulent importers seek out brokers who do not ask for verifying
information in order to use a shell or shelf company to import
fraudulent goods into the United States. When the customs broker or CBP
discovers the illegal activities and attempts to penalize the shell or
shelf company, it disappears. By formalizing the verification process
for importers and requiring that it be carried out every year, this
proposed rule would help prevent the use of shell or shelf companies by
importers who attempt to commit fraud against the United States.
The fraud this proposed rule is intended to prevent can take a
number of forms. It can range from misclassifying merchandise to avoid
duties to intellectual property rights (IPR) violations, to
antidumping/countervailing duty (AD/CVD) infractions, to the
importation of unsafe merchandise. CBP believes that this proposed rule
would improve brokers' knowledge of the importers. This improved broker
knowledge could allow for commercial fraud prevention and revenue
protection. According to CBP's Broker Management Branch, from
approximately 2007 to 2017, there was about $3.3 billion in uncollected
duties related to AD/CVD violations by shell companies. Fifteen percent
of these business entities are out of business. Their business model is
to open, import merchandise subject to AD/CVD for a short period of
time, and then shut down operations and disappear to avoid paying the
required duties.\32\ As CBP cannot find the party responsible for
importing, the duties can remain unpaid forever. Similarly, these shell
companies frequently engage in the trade of counterfeit and pirated
goods. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
estimates that counterfeit and pirated products accounted for as much
as $461 billion dollars in world trade in 2013.\33\ This proposed rule
will help prevent companies from engaging in these types of fraud
because they will need to share real, verified information with their
broker, which will make it much more difficult for those liable to
disappear.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ Source: Email correspondent with CBP's Broker Management
Branch on April 20, 2018.
\33\ Source: Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the
Economic Impact. Accessed April 25, 2018. https://www.oecd.org/industry/global-trade-in-fake-goods-worth-nearly-half-a-trillion-dollars-a-year.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When shell or shelf companies importing goods into the United
States do disappear before paying outstanding customs bills for duties,
taxes and fees, CBP must collect the outstanding debt from sureties who
issue bonds for the imported merchandise. The amount of duties, taxes,
and fees that CBP may collect from sureties is limited by the value of
the bond. In some instances, the bond value is insufficient to cover
all outstanding duties, taxes, and fees owed by the importer.
Consequently, there is a loss of revenue for CBP. At the same time,
sureties incur additional costs to cover the duties, taxes, and fees
collected against the bonds. This proposed rule will allow brokers to
more effectively vet importers and reduce the number of bad actors.
This will decrease revenue loss for the government and reduce costs
incurred by sureties.
Reducing fraud by shell or shelf companies is a benefit to all
parts of the economy. The United States Government would benefit by
collecting the appropriate revenue for imported merchandise. To the
extent that it avoids fruitless enforcement actions against shell or
shelf companies that disappear, it would also save on
[[Page 40314]]
enforcement costs. Brokers would benefit as they would have better
knowledge of their importers and would be better able to avoid engaging
in business with fraudulent companies. Brokers would also benefit
through the leveling of the playing field in obtaining new clients or
retaining current clients. Currently, brokers who properly verify their
importer client's identity when the POA is obtained incur costs
verifying the importer's identity and can lose customers to brokers who
do not ask importers for information to verify their identity. This
proposed rule would eliminate the opportunity to ``broker shop'' for a
broker that does not require as much identifying information from the
importers. The larger trade community would benefit from this proposed
rule as it would reduce identity theft, the number of counterfeit or
IPR-violative imports, and it would help enforce AD/CVD laws. The
American public would benefit through any reduction in unsafe
merchandise that results from this proposed rule. Finally, this
proposed rule fulfills the congressional mandate in TFTEA that CBP
issue regulations governing the broker identification of importers.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996,
requires agencies to assess the impact of regulations on small
entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small
not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
This proposed rule will affect all customs brokers and IORs. The
vast majority of customs brokers and importers are small businesses, so
this rule would have an impact on a substantial number of small
entities. However, these impacts will not be significant. As stated
above, as a result of this rule, brokers would need to collect
identity-verifying information from both their existing importer
clients and prospective importer clients within three years of the
effective date of this proposed rule being finalized.\34\ CBP estimates
that the monetized value of time spent by importers to provide this
data costs $29.76 per POA. Additionally about five percent of importers
not currently working with brokers requesting credit reports with
scores might incur a $40 fee, as noted above. CBP does not consider the
time cost of $29.76 and possibly a $40 fee to be a significant cost to
importers. It is possible that some importers may have more than one
IOR number and therefore more than one POA where their identity would
need to be verified, but that is less likely for small businesses. We
note that even in an extreme case where a small business has 10 POAs
for each of its IOR numbers, the time cost would be only $297.60 (or
even less if there are efficiencies in submitting similar information
multiple times) with a possible $40 credit report fee, which CBP also
does not consider a significant impact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ For any existing client with a POA issued by a partnership,
the broker also must verify the client's identity. Existing clients
with partnership POAs will need to have their identities verified
within two years from the effective date of this proposed rule being
finalized and reverified every year thereafter. However, according
to subject matter experts from CBP's Broker Management Branch,
partnership POAs represent less than 1% of active POAs, though we
lack data on the precise number of partnership POAs. To the extent
partnership POAs are affected, it will increase broker costs by a
small amount.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brokers would incur costs associated with verifying their importer
client's identity whether they are prospective or existing clients.
Above, as seen in Tables 2 and 3 we estimate that in the most costly
year (2021), 2,093 permitted brokers bear total costs of $12,449,635
for an average of $5,948.22 per permitted broker. However, it is
unlikely that the burden is spread evenly among brokers; those with
more clients would need to verify more importer clients' identities, so
their costs would be higher. To estimate the burden per broker and to
assess whether the burden is significant, we will go through the
following steps:
Estimate the number of small brokers in various revenue
categories.
Per each category of brokers, estimate the additional
number of POAs for which brokers will need to verify the importer
client's identity.
Estimate the cost per permitted broker of these
verifications.
Estimate the ratio of costs to annual revenue to assess
whether the costs are significant.
To estimate the number of small brokers in different size
categories, we use data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The U.S. Census
Bureau categorizes customs brokers under the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code 488510, which also includes other
businesses such as freight forwarders.\35\ The Small Business
Administration (SBA) considers a business entity classified under the
488510 NAICS code as small if it has less than $15 million in annual
receipts.\36\ As shown in Table 8, 95 percent of businesses classified
under this NAICS code are small businesses. For the purposes of this
analysis, we will assume that all brokers are small businesses. To the
extent some are not, the impact on small businesses will be smaller
than estimated in this analysis. We estimate the number of firms in
each revenue category by allocating the 2,093 permitted brokers
proportionally to the number of total firms in the NAICS code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ Source: U.S. Census. https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch?code=488510&search=2012%20NAICS%20Search. Accessed
August 8, 2018.
\36\ Source: U.S. Small Business Administration. Table of Small
Business Size Standards Matched to North American Industry
Classification System Codes. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table_2017.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2019.
Table 8--Business Entity Data for NAICS Code 488510
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Number of number of
Annual revenue ($) (midpoint) firms Small permitted
brokers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<100,000 (50,000)............................................ 2,195 Yes 323
100,000-499,999 (300,000).................................... 4,935 Yes 727
500,000-999,999 (750,000).................................... 2,330 Yes 343
1,000,000-2,499,999 (1,750,000).............................. 2,429 Yes 358
2,500,000-4,999,999 (3,750,000).............................. 1,208 Yes 178
5,000,000-7,499,999 (6,250,000).............................. 540 Yes 80
7,500,000-9,999,999 (8,750,000).............................. 284 Yes 42
10,000,000-14,999,999 (12,500,000)........................... 282 Yes 42
[[Page 40315]]
>15,000,000.................................................. 815 No 0
--------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................... 15,018 * (14,203/15,018) 2,093
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: U.S. Census Bureau. 2012 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment Industry. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/econ/susb/2012-susb-annual.html.
* 95 percent are small.
Now that we have estimated the number of permitted brokers in each
size category, we estimate how much of each type of IOR verification
will be done by brokers in each category. We use total annual revenue
as a proxy for the number of clients (IORs) each broker has. While
cases may exist where a broker generates a lot of revenue from just a
few IORs or conversely that a broker generates little revenue from many
IORs, on average we expect that the number of clients is well
correlated with the broker's revenue. To estimate total revenue for
each size category, we use the category's revenue midpoint. We
determine the different types of client identities that need to be
verified as existing importer clients; clients that need their POAs,
information and records to be annually reverified and updated; and
prospective clients, and we allocate these to the different types of
POAs (existing POAs requiring identity-verification, POAs needing
annual verification, and new POAs needing identity-verification)
proportionally to the total revenue for each size category. Table 9
shows the number of brokers in each revenue category, their total
revenue, and the number of each type of POA for which the brokers would
need to verify the importer client's identity under this proposed rule.
Note that we present estimates for 2021, which is the most costly year
for brokers.
Table 9--POAs by Size Category in 2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated POAs requiring New POAs
Annual revenue ($) (midpoint) number of Total revenue Existing POAs annual requiring
brokers (000 ') reverification verification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<100,000 (50,000)............... 323 $16,150 593 1,186 25
100,000-499,999 (300,000)....... 727 218,100 8,007 16,013 343
500,000-999,999 (750,000)....... 343 257,250 9,444 18,888 405
1,000,000-2,499,999 (1,750,000). 358 626,500 22,999 45,999 986
2,500,000-4,999,999 (3,750,000). 178 667,500 24,504 49,009 1,050
5,000,000-7,499,999 (6,250,000). 80 500,000 18,355 36,711 787
7,500,000-9,999,999 (8,750,000). 42 367,500 13,491 26,982 578
10,000,000-14,999,999 42 525,000 19,273 38,546 826
(12,500,000)...................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 2,093 3,178,000 116,667 233,334 5,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We next estimate the costs per broker. In the analysis above, we
estimated that the cost per verification for existing clients'
identities for each POA and the initial verification of the prospective
client's identity for new POAs was each $59.52. Additionally, as shown
in the analysis above, the cost for each reverification of the client's
identity was $22.32. We multiply these costs to the number of POAs from
Table 9 to reach the total costs for each broker category, shown in
Table 10 below.
Table 10--Broker Costs by Size Category in 2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost for Cost for new
Annual revenue ($) (midpoint) Cost for annual POAs requiring Total cost
existing POAs revalidation verification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<100,000 (50,000)............................... $35,288 $26,466 $1,512 $63,267
100,000-499,999 (300,000)....................... 476,555 357,416 20,424 854,394
500,000-999,999 (750,000)....................... 562,099 421,574 24,090 1,007,762
1,000,000-2,499,999 (1,750,000)................. 1,368,920 1,026,690 58,668 2,454,278
2,500,000-4,999,999 (3,750,000)................. 1,458,506 1,093,880 62,507 2,614,893
5,000,000-7,499,999 (6,250,000)................. 1,092,514 819,386 46,822 1,958,722
7,500,000-9,999,999 (8,750,000)................. 802,998 602,248 34,414 1,439,660
10,000,000-14,999,999 (12,500,000).............. 1,147,140 860,355 49,163 2,056,658
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 6,944,020 5,208,015 297,600 12,449,635
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 40316]]
We next calculate the cost per broker and assess whether it is a
significant impact. To calculate the cost per broker for each size
category, we simply divide the total cost for the category from Table
10 by the number of brokers in it. Then we compare the cost per broker
by the revenue per broker (again using the midpoint for each range) to
assess whether the costs significant. The results are presented in
Table 11. As shown, the costs are about 0.4 percent of revenue. CBP
does not consider this to be significant.
Table 11--Costs per Broker in 2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Annual revenue ($) (midpoint) number of Total cost Cost per Cost to
brokers broker revenue ratio
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<100,000 (50,000)............................... 323 $63,267 $195.87 0.004
100,000-499,999 (300,000)....................... 727 854,394 1,175.23 0.004
500,000-999,999 (750,000)....................... 343 1,007,762 2,938.08 0.004
1,000,000-2,499,999 (1,750,000)................. 358 2,454,278 6,855.53 0.004
2,500,000-4,999,999 (3,750,000)................. 178 2,614,893 14,690.41 0.004
5,000,000-7,499,999 (6,250,000)................. 80 1,958,722 24,484.02 0.004
7,500,000-9,999,999 (8,750,000)................. 42 1,439,660 34,277.63 0.004
10,000,000-14,999,999 (12,500,000).............. 42 2,056,658 48,968.04 0.004
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 2,093 12,449,635 5,948.22 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In summary, this proposed rule would affect a substantial number of
importers and brokers. However, the costs do not rise to the level of
economic significance. Therefore, CBP certifies that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. CBP welcomes comments on this conclusion and any
additional data.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), an agency may not conduct, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of
information displays a valid control number assigned by OMB. The
collections of information and recordkeeping requirements related to
this NPRM will be submitted for approval by OMB under a revision and
extension of collection number 1651-0034 (CBP Regulations Pertaining to
Customs Brokers). The likely respondents are importers and customs
brokers.
Customs Brokers Verification Burden
Number of Respondents: 121,667.
Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Number of Responses: 121,667.
Time per Response: 2 hours.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 243,334.
The estimated total annual burden associated with the collection of
information in this NPRM is 243,334 hours.
VII. Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(b)(1),
which provides that the Secretary of the Treasury delegated to the
Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to prescribe and approve
regulations relating to customs revenue functions on behalf of the
Secretary of the Treasury for when the subject matter is not listed as
provided by Treasury Department Order No. 100-16. Accordingly, this
proposed rule to amend such regulations may be signed by the Secretary
of Homeland Security (or his or her delegate).
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and procedure, Brokers, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, CBP proposes to amend 19 CFR part
111 as set forth below:
PART 111--CUSTOMS BROKERS
0
1. The general authority citation for part 111 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 1641.
* * * * *
0
2. Add Sec. 111.43 to read as follows:
Sec. 111.43 Importer identity verification.
(a) Scope. This section sets forth the minimum requirements for
importer and nonresident importer clients to provide information and
for customs brokers to collect, verify, and maintain information about
the identities of their resident and nonresident importer clients. The
customs broker must collect certain information from the importer
client when the importer client provides the customs broker with a
power of attorney and the customs broker must verify all of the
information collected before the broker may transact customs business
on behalf of that client.
(b) Definitions. (1) Importer and nonresident importer. For
purposes of this section, ``importer'' is defined as one of the parties
qualifying as an importer of record under 19 U.S.C. 1484(a)(2)(B).
``Nonresident importer'' is defined as an importer of record that is
not a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for
permanent residence in the United States; or a partnership,
corporation, or other commercial entity that is not organized under the
laws of a jurisdiction within the customs territory of the United
States (as such term is defined in General Note 2 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States) or in the Virgin Islands of the
United States.
(2) Client. For purposes of this section, the ``client'' is defined
as the importer or nonresident importer of record who is seeking or
employing the services of a customs broker to transact customs business
on behalf of the importer or nonresident importer of record.
(3) Grantor. For purposes of this section, the ``grantor'' is
defined as the individual executing the power of attorney on behalf of
the client.
(c) Minimum information that the customs broker must collect from
the client. The customs broker must collect, at minimum, the following
information, if applicable, from the client to allow the customs broker
to verify the client's identity when the customs broker, as required by
Sec. 141.46 of this chapter, obtains a power of attorney:
(1) The client's name;
(2) For a client who is an individual, the client's date of birth;
(3) For a client that is a partnership, corporation, or
association, the grantor's date of birth;
[[Page 40317]]
(4) For a client that is a partnership, corporation, or
association, the client's trade or fictitious names;
(5) The address of the client's physical location (for a client
that is a partnership, corporation, or association, the physical
location would be the client's headquarters) and telephone number;
(6) The client's email address and business website;
(7) A copy of the grantor's unexpired government-issued photo
identification;
(8) The client's Internal Revenue Service (IRS) number, employer
identification number (EIN), or importer of record (IOR) number;
(9) The client's publicly available business identification number;
(10) A recent credit report;
(11) A copy of the client's business registration and license with
state authorities; and
(12) The grantor's authorization to execute power of attorney on
behalf of client.
(d) Verification of information by customs broker. Before
transacting customs business on behalf of a client, the customs broker
must authenticate the client's identity by verifying all the
information collected from the client pursuant to paragraph (c) of this
section. The customs broker must verify all the information collected
from the client or the inapplicability of the information to that
client. The customs broker also must check to determine whether the
client is named as a sanctioned or restricted person or entity by the
U.S. Government, or if the client is suspended or debarred from doing
business with the U.S. Government. The means of verification are at the
customs broker's discretion; however, the broker must use as many of
the recommended verification means as necessary to be reasonably
certain as to the client's identity. These means include:
(1) A check of the appropriate websites to determine whether the
client is named as a sanctioned or restricted person or entity by the
U.S. Government, or if the client is suspended or debarred from doing
business with the U.S. Government;
(2) An in-person review of the grantor's government-issued photo
identification;
(3) An in-person client meeting;
(4) An in-person visit of the client's place of business;
(5) A review of the client's Articles of Incorporation;
(6) A query of publicly available information, business information
and credit reporting entities, Federal, state, and local databases or
websites and any other relevant trade or business sources.
(e) Establishment of policies, procedures and internal controls.
All customs brokers must implement policies, procedures, and internal
controls to identify and verify a client's identity before transacting
customs business on behalf of that client. The policies, procedures,
and internal controls must also fulfill the recordkeeping requirements
in paragraph (f) of this section, particularly the requirement for
updating information and records, and reverifying the client's
identity.
(f) Recordkeeping. All customs brokers must make, retain, and
update records containing the required information used to identify and
to verify the client's identity.
(1) Identification records. At a minimum, customs brokers must
retain any information collected pursuant to paragraph (c) of this
section, including any identifying information presented to the customs
broker, as well as any certifications the client has made.
(2) Verification records. At a minimum, customs brokers must retain
descriptions of any documents relied upon, any non-documentary methods
relied upon, any results of measures undertaken, and any resolution of
discrepancies used to verify the client's identity as required by
paragraph (d) of this section. The verification records must indicate
which information collected pursuant to paragraph (c) was verified, who
performed the verification, and the date the verification was
performed.
(3) Compliance with other recordkeeping provisions. All customs
brokers must comply with the recordkeeping provisions of this part,
part 141 of this chapter, and part 163 of this chapter. The
identification and verification records must be retained and made
available upon request for CBP examination in accordance with parts
111, 141, and 163 of this chapter. The required retention period for
the identification and verification records is the same period as is
required for a power of attorney in Sec. Sec. 111.23 and 163.4 of this
chapter.
(4) Updating information. All customs brokers must implement
procedures to update the records required in this section and to
reverify the information collected from the client pursuant to the
procedures set forth in paragraph (d) annually to ensure that the
information is accurate, timely, and complete.
(g) Penalties for noncompliance. Failure to collect, verify,
secure, retain, update, or make available for inspection the
information required in this section is grounds for a monetary penalty
to be assessed against the customs broker not to exceed $10,000 per
client in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(A), or revocation or
suspension of the customs broker's license or permit in accordance with
19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(B).
(h) Timing of verifications. (1) Prospective clients. For all
prospective clients, customs brokers must verify the information
required in this section before the customs broker may begin to
transact customs business on behalf of that client. The customs broker
must comply with all the requirements in this section for that client
including updating all records and information.
(2) Existing clients. For existing clients with a power of attorney
issued by a partnership, customs brokers must, within two years of the
final rule being effective, update and verify the information required
in this section. For all other existing clients, customs brokers must,
within three years of the final rule being effective, update and verify
the information required in this section. By these dates, the customs
broker must have complied with all the requirements in this section,
including the updating of all records and information, and must
continue to comply.
(3) Reverification. Reverification must occur annually after the
initial verification required by this section.
Dated: August 6, 2019.
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-17179 Filed 8-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P