Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Review of Defense Solicitations by Procurement Center Representatives (DFARS Case 2019-D008), 39256-39258 [2019-16764]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
39256
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2019 / Proposed Rules
252.215–701X
Review.
Program Should-Cost
As prescribed in 215.408(8), use the
following clause:
Program Should-Cost Review (Date)
(a) The Government has the right to
perform a program should-cost review, as
described in Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) 15.407–4(b). The review may be
conducted in support of a particular contract
proposal or during contract performance to
find opportunities to reduce program costs.
The Government will communicate the
elements of the proposed should-cost review
to the prime contractor (Pub. L. 115–91).
(b) If the Government performs a program
should-cost review, upon the Government’s
request, the Contractor shall provide access
to accurate and complete cost data and
Contractor facilities and personnel necessary
to permit the Government to perform the
program should-cost review.
(c) The Government has the right to use
third-party experts to supplement the
program should-cost review team. The
Contractor shall provide access to the
Contractor’s facilities and information
necessary to support the program should-cost
review to any third-party experts who have
signed non-disclosure agreements in
accordance with the FAR 52.203–16.
(End of Clause)
[FR Doc. 2019–16763 Filed 8–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
I. Background
48 CFR Part 219
[Docket DARS–2019–0034]
RIN 0750–AK43
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Review of
Defense Solicitations by Procurement
Center Representatives (DFARS Case
2019–D008)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2017 that provides limits on the
scope of review by the Small Business
Administration’s procurement center
representatives for certain solicitations
awarded by or for DoD.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Aug 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
address shown below on or before
October 8, 2019, to be considered in the
formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2019–D008,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2019–D008.’’ Select
‘‘Comment Now’’ and follow the
instructions provided to submit a
comment. Please include ‘‘DFARS Case
2019–D008’’ on any attached
documents.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2019–D008 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Jennifer
D. Johnson, OUSD(A–S)DPC/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jennifer D. Johnson, telephone 571–
372–6100.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This rule proposes to revise the
DFARS to implement section 1811 of
the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (Pub.
L. 114–328) and the Small Business
Administration (SBA) proposed rule
published in the Federal Register on
December 4, 2018, at 83 FR 62516.
Section 1811 provides limits on the
scope of review by SBA’s procurement
center representatives for certain
solicitations awarded by or for DoD.
Specifically, section 1811 limits the
scope of review by procurement center
representatives, unless DoD requests a
review, if the solicitation is awarded by
or for DoD and—
• Is conducted pursuant to section 22
of the Arms Export Control Act (22
U.S.C. 2762);
• Is a humanitarian operation as
defined in 10 U.S.C. 401(e);
• Is a contingency operation as
defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(13);
• Is to be awarded pursuant to an
agreement with the government of a
foreign country in which U.S. Armed
Forces are deployed; or
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Both the place of award and place
of performance outside the United
States and its territories.
SBA’s proposed rule states that,
unless the contracting agency requests a
review, procurement center
representatives will not review such
procurements. Additionally, section
1811 excludes these procurements from
DoD’s small business goals.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule proposes to amend DFARS
part 219 to implement section 1811 of
the NDAA for FY 2017 and SBA’s
proposed rule. Specifically, the rule
proposes to add text at DFARS 219.402
to inform contracting officers that
procurement center representatives will
not review acquisitions conducted by or
for DoD, unless the contracting activity
requests a review, if the acquisition is—
• For foreign military sales (see
DFARS 225.7300);
• In support of humanitarian and
civic assistance;
• In support of a contingency
operation;
• Awarded pursuant to a Status of
Forces Agreement or other agreement
with the government of a foreign
country in which U.S. Armed Forces are
deployed; or
• Both awarded and performed
outside the United States and its
outlying areas.
The proposed text includes a
definition of ‘‘humanitarian and civic
assistance’’ that applies only to the
implementation of section 1811. Both
section 1811 and SBA’s proposed rule
refer to ‘‘a humanitarian operation as
defined in section 401(e) of title 10,
United States Code.’’ Although the term
‘‘humanitarian operation’’ is used, the
type of activities it covers are quite
different from the ‘‘humanitarian or
peacekeeping operation’’ defined in
Federal Acquisition Regulation 2.101
and currently used in the DFARS. In 10
U.S.C. 401(e), the term ‘‘humanitarian
and civic assistance’’ is used to refer to
specific activities carried out in
conjunction with authorized military
operations in a foreign country.
Examples of such assistance include
construction of rudimentary surface
transportation systems, well drilling,
and construction of basic sanitation
facilities. Therefore, this proposed rule
includes a definition to avoid confusion
among the contracting workforce.
This rule also proposes to add a
reference in DFARS subpart 219.5, SetAsides for Small Business, to the
exclusions in DFARS 219.402.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2019 / Proposed Rules
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
This rule does not propose to create
any new provisions or clauses or impact
any existing provisions or clauses.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not expected to be subject
to E.O. 13771, because this rule is not
a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 12866.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because it is expected to impact
primarily Government operations.
However, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis has been performed and is
summarized as follows:
This rule proposes to revise the
DFARS to implement section 1811 of
the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (Pub.
L. 114–328) and the SBA proposed rule
published in the Federal Register on
December 4, 2018, at 83 FR 62516.
Specifically, the rule informs
contracting officers that procurement
center representatives will not review
acquisitions conducted by or for DoD,
unless the contracting activity requests
a review, if the acquisition is—
• For foreign military sales (see
DFARS 225.7300);
• In support of humanitarian and
civic assistance;
• In support of a contingency
operation;
• Awarded pursuant to a Status of
Forces Agreement or other agreement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Aug 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
with the government of a foreign
country in which U.S. Armed Forces are
deployed; or
• Both awarded and performed
outside the United States and its
outlying areas.
Additionally, section 1811 of the
NDAA for FY 2017 excludes these
procurements from DoD’s small
business goals.
The objective of this rule is to
implement, in the DFARS, the limits on
the scope of review by procurement
center representatives. The legal basis
for the rule is section 1811 of the NDAA
for FY 2017.
This rule may impact small entities
that are interested in performing the
types of DoD contracts listed in section
1811 of the NDAA for FY 2017.
According to the Federal Procurement
Data System (FPDS), DoD awarded an
average of 12,658 contracts and orders
for performance outside the United
States to approximately 1,292 unique
small entities per year in FY 2016, 2017,
and 2018. Approximately 4 percent of
those small entities received awards for
foreign military sales. About 8 percent
received awards in support of a
contingency operation. Approximately
81 percent received awards made
pursuant to an agreement such as a
Status of Forces Agreement.
FPDS does not currently collect data
on the type of humanitarian operation
identified in section 1811, which is very
different from the ‘‘humanitarian or
peacekeeping’’ operation defined in
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
2.101 and used in the DFARS. FPDS
does collect data on humanitarian or
peacekeeping operations, as defined in
FAR 2.101, showing that about 1% of
the small entities, performing contracts
or orders outside the United States,
received awards for humanitarian or
peacekeeping operations. The data
collected may provide some indication
of the number of small entities that
could perform contracts or orders for the
type of humanitarian operation
identified in section 1811.
This rule does not impose any new
reporting, recordkeeping or other
compliance requirements for small
entities.
This rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
There are no known alternatives
which would accomplish the stated
objectives of the applicable statute.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39257
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C 610 (DFARS Case 2019–D008), in
correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 219 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 219—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 219 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Add section 219.402 to subpart
219.4 to read as follows:
■
219.402 Small Business Administration
procurement center representatives.
(c)(i) Authority. This section
implements section 1811 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114–328).
(ii) Definition. As used in this section,
‘‘humanitarian and civic assistance’’ (10
U.S.C. 401(e)) means any of the
following activities carried out in
conjunction with authorized military
operations in a foreign country:
(A) Medical, surgical, dental, and
veterinary care provided in areas of a
country that are rural or underserved by
professionals in those fields, including
education, training, and technical
assistance related to the care provided.
(B) Construction of rudimentary
surface transportation systems.
(C) Well drilling and construction of
basic sanitation facilities.
(D) Rudimentary construction and
repair of public facilities.
(iii) Exclusions. Unless the
contracting activity requests a review,
SBA procurement center representatives
will not review acquisitions conducted
by or for DoD if the acquisition is—
(A) For foreign military sales (see
225.7300);
(B) In support of humanitarian and
civic assistance;
(C) In support of a contingency
operation;
(D) Awarded pursuant to a Status of
Forces Agreement or other agreement
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
39258
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
with the government of a foreign
country in which U.S. Armed Forces are
deployed; or
(E) Both awarded and performed
outside the United States and its
outlying areas.
■ 3. Revise section 219.502–1 to read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Aug 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
219.502–1 Requirements for setting aside
acquisitions.
Do not set aside acquisitions—
(a) For supplies that were developed
and financed, in whole or in part, by
Canadian sources under the U.S.Canadian Defense Development Sharing
Program; or
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(b) Excluded from procurement center
representative review (see
219.402(c)(iii)).
[FR Doc. 2019–16764 Filed 8–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 154 (Friday, August 9, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39256-39258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 219
[Docket DARS-2019-0034]
RIN 0750-AK43
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Review of
Defense Solicitations by Procurement Center Representatives (DFARS Case
2019-D008)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 that provides limits on
the scope of review by the Small Business Administration's procurement
center representatives for certain solicitations awarded by or for DoD.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before October 8, 2019, to be considered
in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2019-D008, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for ``DFARS Case 2019-D008.'' Select ``Comment Now'' and follow
the instructions provided to submit a comment. Please include ``DFARS
Case 2019-D008'' on any attached documents.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2019-D008 in
the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
[cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms.
Jennifer D. Johnson, OUSD(A-S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jennifer D. Johnson, telephone
571-372-6100.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This rule proposes to revise the DFARS to implement section 1811 of
the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017
(Pub. L. 114-328) and the Small Business Administration (SBA) proposed
rule published in the Federal Register on December 4, 2018, at 83 FR
62516. Section 1811 provides limits on the scope of review by SBA's
procurement center representatives for certain solicitations awarded by
or for DoD.
Specifically, section 1811 limits the scope of review by
procurement center representatives, unless DoD requests a review, if
the solicitation is awarded by or for DoD and--
Is conducted pursuant to section 22 of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2762);
Is a humanitarian operation as defined in 10 U.S.C.
401(e);
Is a contingency operation as defined in 10 U.S.C.
101(a)(13);
Is to be awarded pursuant to an agreement with the
government of a foreign country in which U.S. Armed Forces are
deployed; or
Both the place of award and place of performance outside
the United States and its territories.
SBA's proposed rule states that, unless the contracting agency
requests a review, procurement center representatives will not review
such procurements. Additionally, section 1811 excludes these
procurements from DoD's small business goals.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule proposes to amend DFARS part 219 to implement section
1811 of the NDAA for FY 2017 and SBA's proposed rule. Specifically, the
rule proposes to add text at DFARS 219.402 to inform contracting
officers that procurement center representatives will not review
acquisitions conducted by or for DoD, unless the contracting activity
requests a review, if the acquisition is--
For foreign military sales (see DFARS 225.7300);
In support of humanitarian and civic assistance;
In support of a contingency operation;
Awarded pursuant to a Status of Forces Agreement or other
agreement with the government of a foreign country in which U.S. Armed
Forces are deployed; or
Both awarded and performed outside the United States and
its outlying areas.
The proposed text includes a definition of ``humanitarian and civic
assistance'' that applies only to the implementation of section 1811.
Both section 1811 and SBA's proposed rule refer to ``a humanitarian
operation as defined in section 401(e) of title 10, United States
Code.'' Although the term ``humanitarian operation'' is used, the type
of activities it covers are quite different from the ``humanitarian or
peacekeeping operation'' defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation
2.101 and currently used in the DFARS. In 10 U.S.C. 401(e), the term
``humanitarian and civic assistance'' is used to refer to specific
activities carried out in conjunction with authorized military
operations in a foreign country. Examples of such assistance include
construction of rudimentary surface transportation systems, well
drilling, and construction of basic sanitation facilities. Therefore,
this proposed rule includes a definition to avoid confusion among the
contracting workforce.
This rule also proposes to add a reference in DFARS subpart 219.5,
Set-Asides for Small Business, to the exclusions in DFARS 219.402.
[[Page 39257]]
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule does not propose to create any new provisions or clauses
or impact any existing provisions or clauses.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
V. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not expected to be subject to E.O. 13771, because this
rule is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because it is expected to impact primarily Government operations.
However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed
and is summarized as follows:
This rule proposes to revise the DFARS to implement section 1811 of
the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017
(Pub. L. 114-328) and the SBA proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on December 4, 2018, at 83 FR 62516. Specifically, the rule
informs contracting officers that procurement center representatives
will not review acquisitions conducted by or for DoD, unless the
contracting activity requests a review, if the acquisition is--
For foreign military sales (see DFARS 225.7300);
In support of humanitarian and civic assistance;
In support of a contingency operation;
Awarded pursuant to a Status of Forces Agreement or other
agreement with the government of a foreign country in which U.S. Armed
Forces are deployed; or
Both awarded and performed outside the United States and
its outlying areas.
Additionally, section 1811 of the NDAA for FY 2017 excludes these
procurements from DoD's small business goals.
The objective of this rule is to implement, in the DFARS, the
limits on the scope of review by procurement center representatives.
The legal basis for the rule is section 1811 of the NDAA for FY 2017.
This rule may impact small entities that are interested in
performing the types of DoD contracts listed in section 1811 of the
NDAA for FY 2017. According to the Federal Procurement Data System
(FPDS), DoD awarded an average of 12,658 contracts and orders for
performance outside the United States to approximately 1,292 unique
small entities per year in FY 2016, 2017, and 2018. Approximately 4
percent of those small entities received awards for foreign military
sales. About 8 percent received awards in support of a contingency
operation. Approximately 81 percent received awards made pursuant to an
agreement such as a Status of Forces Agreement.
FPDS does not currently collect data on the type of humanitarian
operation identified in section 1811, which is very different from the
``humanitarian or peacekeeping'' operation defined in Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101 and used in the DFARS. FPDS does
collect data on humanitarian or peacekeeping operations, as defined in
FAR 2.101, showing that about 1% of the small entities, performing
contracts or orders outside the United States, received awards for
humanitarian or peacekeeping operations. The data collected may provide
some indication of the number of small entities that could perform
contracts or orders for the type of humanitarian operation identified
in section 1811.
This rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping or other
compliance requirements for small entities.
This rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
There are no known alternatives which would accomplish the stated
objectives of the applicable statute.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C 610 (DFARS Case 2019-D008), in
correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 219 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 219--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 219 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
0
2. Add section 219.402 to subpart 219.4 to read as follows:
219.402 Small Business Administration procurement center
representatives.
(c)(i) Authority. This section implements section 1811 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114-
328).
(ii) Definition. As used in this section, ``humanitarian and civic
assistance'' (10 U.S.C. 401(e)) means any of the following activities
carried out in conjunction with authorized military operations in a
foreign country:
(A) Medical, surgical, dental, and veterinary care provided in
areas of a country that are rural or underserved by professionals in
those fields, including education, training, and technical assistance
related to the care provided.
(B) Construction of rudimentary surface transportation systems.
(C) Well drilling and construction of basic sanitation facilities.
(D) Rudimentary construction and repair of public facilities.
(iii) Exclusions. Unless the contracting activity requests a
review, SBA procurement center representatives will not review
acquisitions conducted by or for DoD if the acquisition is--
(A) For foreign military sales (see 225.7300);
(B) In support of humanitarian and civic assistance;
(C) In support of a contingency operation;
(D) Awarded pursuant to a Status of Forces Agreement or other
agreement
[[Page 39258]]
with the government of a foreign country in which U.S. Armed Forces are
deployed; or
(E) Both awarded and performed outside the United States and its
outlying areas.
0
3. Revise section 219.502-1 to read as follows:
219.502-1 Requirements for setting aside acquisitions.
Do not set aside acquisitions--
(a) For supplies that were developed and financed, in whole or in
part, by Canadian sources under the U.S.-Canadian Defense Development
Sharing Program; or
(b) Excluded from procurement center representative review (see
219.402(c)(iii)).
[FR Doc. 2019-16764 Filed 8-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
