Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Reasons for Underredemption of the WIC Cash-Value Benefit, 38937-38941 [2019-17016]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2019 / Notices the application within [60 days] after the time for filing a reply, or when further proceedings are held, within [60 days] after completion of such proceedings. (a) For an application involving a prevailing party. The decision on the application shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant’s eligibility and status as a prevailing party and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The decision shall also include, if applicable, findings on whether the agency’s position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. (b) For an application involving an allegedly excessive agency demand. The decision on the application shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant’s eligibility and an explanation of the reasons why the agency’s demand was or was not determined to be substantially in excess of the underlying decision of the adjudicative officer and was or was not unreasonable when compared with that decision. That determination shall be based upon all the facts and circumstances of the case. The decision on the application shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the applicant has committed a willful violation of law or otherwise acted in bad faith, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. (c) Awards. An adjudicative officer presiding over an EAJA proceeding may reduce the amount to be awarded, or deny any award, to the extent that the party during the course of the proceedings engaged in conduct which unduly and unreasonably protracted the final resolution of the matter in controversy. jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES § 4.07 Agency Review Either the applicant or agency counsel may seek review of the decision of the adjudicative officer on the fee application, or the agency may decide to review the decision on its own initiative, in accordance with [insert cross-reference to agency’s regular review procedures]. § 4.08 Judicial Review Judicial review of final agency decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2). § 4.09 Stay of Decision Concerning Award Any proceedings on an application for fees under these rules shall be VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Aug 07, 2019 Jkt 247001 automatically stayed until the agency’s final disposition of the decision on which the application is based and either the time period for seeking judicial review expires, or if review has been sought, until final disposition is made by a court and no further judicial review is available. § 4.10 Payment of Award An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit to the [comptroller or other disbursing official] of the paying agency a copy of the agency’s final decision granting the award, accompanied by a certification that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts. [Include here address for submissions at specific agency.] The agency will pay the amount awarded to the applicant within [60 days]. [FR Doc. 2019–16768 Filed 8–7–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6110–01–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Nutrition Service Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request—Reasons for Underredemption of the WIC CashValue Benefit Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment on this proposed information collection for Reasons for Underredemption of the WIC Cash-Value Benefit. This collection is a NEW information collection. This study informs the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) about the reasons behind underredemption of the cash-value benefit (CVB) issued to participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). FNS is particularly interested in how CVB redemption rates are affected by State agency policies and practices. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 7, 2019. ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to Ruth Morgan, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be submitted via fax to the attention of Ruth Morgan at 703–305–2576 or via email at ruth.morgan@usda.gov. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38937 Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the online instructions at https:// www.regulations.gov for submitting comments electronically. All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will be a matter of public record. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of this information collection should be directed to Ruth Morgan at 703–457–7759. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Title: Reasons for Underredemption of the WIC Cash-Value Benefit. Form Number: N/A. OMB Number: Not Yet Assigned. Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined. Type of Request: New Collection. Abstract: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides nutritious supplemental foods, healthcare referrals, breastfeeding support, and nutrition education to low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and postpartum women, infants and children up to age 5 who are at nutritional risk. A Final Rule was published in the Federal Register on March 4, 2014 (79 FR 12273) that revised the WIC food packages to add a monthly cash-value benefit (CVB) for the purchase of fruits and vegetables. This rule also detailed specific provisions for the value of the CVB, the types of fruits and vegetables authorized, and other State options for providing this benefit. Recent studies have estimated that redemption rates for CVBs range from 73 percent to 77 percent; 1 2 however, the reasons for 1 Phillips, D., Bell, L., Morgan, R., & Pooler, J. (2014). Transition to EBT in WIC: Review of impact and examination of participant redemption E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM Continued 08AUN1 38938 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2019 / Notices underredemption of this benefit have not been fully explored. FNS has funded this study to determine the barriers to CVB redemption and the effects of State agency policies, practices, and other factors on CVB redemption rates. There are a variety of WIC State agency policies and practices that may contribute to CVB underredemption, including but not limited to: vendor authorization and selection policies, the forms of fruits and vegetables allowed, vendor minimum stocking requirements, and participant tools and training available. Other State and household factors may also affect redemption rates, such as geographic access to WIC vendors or household preferences for certain types of fruits and vegetables. In order to identify the factors associated with CVB redemption and examine the effects of State agency policies and practices on CVB redemption rates, FNS is conducting a study in 12 States, with more in-depth data collection occurring in 4 of these States. The study will gather data from WIC State plans and policy documents, administrative records, and WIC participants. State plan and policy document data will be collected from 12 States and used to identify variations in State agency policies and practices that may affect CVB redemption rates. Administrative record collection will be limited to electronic benefit transfer (EBT) data previously collected from 12 State agencies for the WIC Food Cost Containment Practices study (OMB Number 0584–0627, Expiration Date 09/ 30/2020). EBT data will be used to calculate rates in each of the 12 study State agencies and, in conjunction with the policy data, will be used to assess the ways in which redemption rates vary with differences in policies and practices. Participant and State agency staff interviews in 4 of the 12 States will be used to understand the factors that are most salient to participants in jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES patterns: Final report. Retrieved from https:// altarum.org/sites/default/files/uploadedpublication-files/Altarum_Transition%20to %20WIC%20EBT_Final%20Report_071614.pdf. 2 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Review of WIC food packages: Improving balance and choice: Final report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/23655. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Aug 07, 2019 Jkt 247001 making decisions about purchasing fruits and vegetables with their CVB and barriers to redemption. FNS will select two States with low CVB redemption rates, one State with an intermediate redemption rate, and one State with a high redemption rate for participant and State agency staff interviews. Affected Public: (1) State, local, and tribal governments; (2) nonprofits; and (3) individuals. Identified respondent groups include the following: 1. State, local, and tribal governments: State agency staff in four States, local agency staff at six local agencies, and clinic staff at six clinics. 2. Nonprofits: Staff at two local agencies and two WIC clinics.3 3. Individuals: WIC participants in four study States. Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated number of respondents is 317 (20 State and local government staff, 4 nonprofit staff, and 293 individuals). Of the 317 respondents to be contacted, 257 are expected to be responsive, and 60 are expected to be nonresponsive. The breakout follows: 1. 20 State and local government staff: Of 8 State agency staff to be contacted across 4 States, 8 are expected to be responsive; of 6 local agency staff contacted across 6 local agencies, 6 are expected to be responsive; of 6 clinic staff contacted across 6 clinics, 6 are expected to be responsive. 2. 4 nonprofit staff: Of 2 local agency staff contacted across 2 local agencies, 2 are expected to be responsive; of 2 clinic staff to be contacted across 2 clinics, 2 are expected to be responsive. 3. 293 individuals: 9 individuals are expected to participate in a pretest. Of 284 individuals to be contacted for the main study, 144 are expected to be responsive. Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 4.5, based on the estimated 1,417 total annual responses (1,277 responsive and 140 nonresponsive) to be made by the 317 respondents. See table 1 for the estimated number of responses per respondent for each type of respondent. The breakout follows: 3 Local agencies and clinics may be either government or nonprofit organizations. It is assumed that no contacted local agencies or clinics will refuse to participate. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1. WIC State agency staff: The estimated number of responses per State agency staff is three. Four State agency staff will receive and respond to advance materials and scheduling; the same four State agency staff will take part in a recruitment call. Up to eight State agency staff will participate in a semistructured interview. 2. WIC local agency staff (including state, local, and tribal governments and non-profits): The estimated number of responses per local agency staff is four. Eight local agency staff will receive and respond to advance materials and scheduling; the same eight local agency staff will take part in a recruitment call. 3. WIC clinic staff (including state, local, and tribal governments and nonprofits): The estimated number of responses per local clinic staff is four. Eight clinic staff will receive and respond to advance materials and scheduling; the same 8 clinic staff will take part in a recruitment call. 4. Individuals (WIC participants): The estimated number of responses per individual is 5.10. In total, nine individuals will participate in a pretest. 284 individuals will receive a study brochure. Of the 164 who are eligible to participate, 112 will fill out the signup sheet for in-person interviews, and 52 will fill out the signup sheet for phone interviews. Of the 164 who fill out signup sheets, 20 will not respond. Estimated Total Annual Responses: 1,417 (1,277 annual responses for responsive participants and 140 annual responses for nonresponsive participants). Estimated Time per Response: The estimated average response time is 0.12 hours for all respondents (0.12 hours for responsive participants and 0.05 hours for nonresponsive participants). The estimated time of response varies from 30 seconds (0.0083 hours) to 1 hour depending on respondent group and activity, as shown in table 1. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 163.38 hours (156.38 hours for responsive participants, and 7.0 hours for nonresponsive participants). See table 1 for estimated total annual burden for each type of respondent. BILLING CODE 3410–30–P E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES VerDate Sep<11>2014 Table 1. Total Public Burden Hours and Respondent Costs Respondent Category Type of Respondent Instruments and Activities s::: ..."' Cll -~ Vl '+- Jkt 247001 c._ E til ~<II 0 Cll ,_"CC Cll s::: s::: Cll _,e 0 ::I E c_ ::I "' zcil! Vl "' s::: 0 c-0- CII VI .__ Cll LL..!l:: ::I s::: "' Cll s::: <( .__ Cll Cll "' 0-s::: "' s::: rag_ ... "' I-ll:: 0 "' .__ 0 c_ :I 0 "' Cll Cll ::CD:: s::: Cll "CC Cll "CC .__ s::: s::: :I ::I 0 S::::::c <~:-- fij '+- 0 0 0 -v;ra ._ s::: ::I 4-S::: :I CIQ <a ..."' s::: Cll "CC .__ <a 0 '+- s::: Cll Nonresponsive .__ c_ ~<II s::: Cll Cll "' -CCII :I E 0~ "' s::: 0 c-0- CII :I VI .__ Cll LL..!l:: zz :I s::: "' Cll .__ Cll "' s::: Cll "' 0-s::: ... "' I-ll:: :I 0 "' Cll s::: <( fijg_ 0 Cll "' .__ 0 c_ ::CD:: "";·.:::; ... "' :I CIQ OLLJ -v;ra ._ :I ::I s::: Cll ... <1: ~ 0 S::::::c 1-s:::v;- "CC Cll ... s::: "CC ::I til ... 0 '-::!:I: <(_. '-'CC_. PO 00000 State, local, and Tribal Government Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM State, Local, and Tribal Government WIC State agency staff Advance communications (letter) 4 4 1 4 0.10 0.40 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.40 WIC State agency staff Advance communications (FAQ sheet) 4 4 1 4 0.10 0.40 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.40 WIC State agency staff Recruitment call 4 4 1 4 0.7S 3.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 3.00 WIC State agency staff Reminder email 4 4 1 4 o.os 0.20 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.20 WIC State agency staff Telephone interviews with up to two staff per State 8 8 1 8 1.00 8.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 8.00 WIC State agency staff subtotal 8 8 3 24 0.50 12.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 12.00 WIC local agency staff Advance communications (letter) 6 6 1 6 0.10 0.60 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.60 WIC local agency staff Advance communications (FAQ sheet) 6 6 1 6 0.10 0.60 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.60 WIC local agency staff Recruitment call 6 6 1 6 0.7S 4.50 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 4.50 WIC local agency staff Reminder email 6 6 1 6 0.05 0.30 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.30 WIC local agency staff subtotal 08AUN1 6 6 4 24 0.25 6.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.00 Clinic staff Advance communications (letter) 6 6 1 6 0.10 0.60 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.60 Clinic staff Advance communications (FAQ sheet) 6 6 1 6 0.10 0.60 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.60 Clinic staff Recruitment call 6 6 1 6 0.75 4.50 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 4.50 Clinic staff Reminder email 6 6 1 6 0.05 0.30 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.30 6 6 4 24 0.25 6.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.00 20 20 4 72 0.33 24.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 24.00 Clinic staff subtotal State, Local, and Tribal government subtotal Nonprofit WIC local agency staff Advance communications (letter) Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2019 / Notices 16:51 Aug 07, 2019 Responsive 0.20 38939 EN08AU19.026</GPH> jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 38940 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Advance communications (FAQ sheet) 2 2 1 2 0.10 0.20 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.20 WIC local agency staff Recruitment call 2 2 1 2 0.75 1.50 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 1.50 WIC local agency staff Reminder email 2 2 1 2 0.05 0.10 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.10 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 2 2 4 8 0.25 2.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 2.00 Clinic staff Advance communications (letter) 2 2 1 2 0.10 0.20 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.20 Clinic staff Advance communications (FAQ sheet) 2 2 1 2 0.10 0.20 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.20 Clinic staff Recruitment call 2 2 1 2 0.75 1.50 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 1.50 Reminder email 2 2 1 2 0.05 0.10 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.10 2 2 4 8 0.25 2.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 2.00 4 4 4 16 0.25 4.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 WIC local agency staff subtotal Nonprofit Clinic staff (continued) Clinic staff subtotal Nonprofit subtotal Individuals Pretest 9 9 1 9 0.75 6.75 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.75 WIC participants Study brochure 284 224 1 224 0.05 11.20 60 1 60 0.05 3.00 14.20 WIC participants Eligibility screener form 224 164 1 164 0.05 8.20 60 1 60 0.05 3.00 11.20 Fmt 4703 WIC participants Interview sign-up for in-person interviews 112 112 1 112 0.05 5.60 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 5.60 WIC participants Interview call sheet for telephone interviews 52 52 1 52 0.05 2.60 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 2.60 WIC participants Reminder call 52 52 1 52 0.008 3 0.43 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.43 WIC participants Consent form 164 144 1 144 0.03 4.32 20 1 20 0.05 1.00 5.32 WIC participants Interview protocol 144 144 1 144 0.50 72.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 72.00 WIC participants Demographic survey 144 144 1 144 0.07 10.08 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 10.08 WIC participants Thank-you note 144 144 1 144 0.05 7.20 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 7.20 293 233 5.10 1,189 0.11 128.38 60 3 140 0.05 7.00 135.38 317 257 4.97 1,277 0.12 156.38 60 2.33 140 0.05 7.00 163.38 Sfmt 9990 Frm 00014 WIC participants E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1 EN08AU19.027</GPH> Individuals Individual subtotal TOTAL Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2019 / Notices 16:51 Aug 07, 2019 WIC local agency staff Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2019 / Notices Dated: July 26, 2019. Brandon Lipps, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [FR Doc. 2019–17016 Filed 8–7–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–C DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Foreign Agricultural Service Adjustment of Appendices Under the Dairy Tariff-Rate Quota Import Licensing Regulation for the 2019 Tariff-Rate Quota Year AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice. This notice announces the transfer of amounts for certain dairy articles from the historical license category (Appendix 1) to the lottery (nonhistorical) license category (Appendix 2) pursuant to the Dairy Tariff-Rate Quota Import Licensing regulations, 7 CFR part 6, for the 2019 quota year. SUMMARY: DATES: August 8, 2019. Abdelsalam El-Farra, (202) 720–9439; abdelsalam.el-farra@fas.usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Foreign Agricultural Service, under a delegation of authority from the Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs, administers the Dairy Tariff-Rate Import Quota Licensing Regulation codified at 7 CFR 6.20–6.36 that provides for the issuance of licenses to import certain dairy articles under tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) as set forth in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States. These dairy articles may only be entered into the United States at the low-tier tariff by or for the account of a person or firm to whom such licenses have been issued and only in accordance with the terms and conditions of the regulation. Licenses are issued on a calendar year basis, and each license authorizes the license holder to import a specified quantity and type of dairy article from a specified country of origin. The Import Policies and Export Reporting Division, Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, issues these licenses and, in conjunction with U.S. 38941 Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, monitors their use. The regulation at 7 CFR 6.34(a) states that whenever a historical license is permanently surrendered, revoked by the Licensing Authority, or not issued to an applicant pursuant to the provisions of 6.23, then the amount of such license will be transferred to Appendix 2. Section 6.34(b) provides that the cumulative annual transfers will be published by notice in the Federal Register. Accordingly, this document sets forth the revised Appendices for the 2019 tariff-rate quota year in the table below. Although there are no changes to the quantities for designated licenses (Appendix 3 and Appendix 4) nor to the total amount for each article, those numbers are also included in the table below for completeness. Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Dated: August 2, 2019. Ronald Lord, Licensing Authority. ARTICLES SUBJECT TO DAIRY IMPORT LICENSES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2019 [Kilograms] 1 Historical licenses (Appendix 1) 2 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES Non-cheese articles, notes 6, 7, 8, 12, 14 (appendix 1 reduction) Butter (Note 6, Commodity Code G) (¥1,773 kg) ........... EU–27 ........................................................................ New Zealand .............................................................. Other Countries (¥1,773 kg) .................................... Any Country ............................................................... Dried Skim Milk (Note 7, Commodity Code K) ................. Australia ..................................................................... Canada ....................................................................... Any Country ............................................................... Dried Whole Milk (Note 8, Commodity Code H) .............. New Zealand .............................................................. Any Country ............................................................... Dried Buttermilk/Whey (Note 12, Commodity Code M) .... Canada ....................................................................... New Zealand .............................................................. Butter Substitutes Containing Over 45 Percent of Butterfat and/or Butter Oil (Note 14, Commodity Code SU) ................................................................................. Any Country ............................................................... Lottery licenses (Appendix 2) 3 Sum of Appendix 1 & 24 Designated licenses (Tokyo Round, Appendix 3) 4 Designated licenses (Uruguay Round, Appendix 4) 4 Total 4 4,301,461 62,599 76,503 35,382 4,126,977 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,675,539 33,562 74,090 38,553 2,529,334 5,261,000 600,076 219,565 4,441,359 3,321,300 3,175 3,318,125 224,981 161,161 63,820 6,977,000 96,161 150,593 73,935 6,656,311 5,261,000 600,076 219,565 4,441,359 3,321,300 3,175 3,318,125 224,981 161,161 63,820 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 6,977,000 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 5,261,000 ........................ ........................ ........................ 3,321,300 ........................ ........................ 224,981 ........................ ........................ 0 0 6,080,500 6,080,500 6,080,500 6,080,500 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 6,080,500 ........................ Total: Non-Cheese Articles (¥1,773 kg) ........... 4,301,461 17,563,320 21,864,781 ........................ ........................ 21,864,781 Cheese Articles (Notes 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25): Cheese and Substitutes for Cheese (Note 16, Commodity Code OT) (¥2,142 kg) ...................................... Argentina .................................................................... Australia ..................................................................... Canada ....................................................................... Costa Rica ................................................................. EU–27 (¥2,142 kg) ................................................... Of which Portugal is: .......................................... EU–27 not including Portugal (¥2,142 kg) ...................... Israel .......................................................................... Iceland ........................................................................ 17,613,583 0 535,628 950,162 0 13,932,093 65,838 13,866,255 79,696 29,054 13,856,148 7,690 5,542 190,838 0 9,335,563 63,471 9,272,092 0 264,946 31,469,731 7,690 541,170 1,141,000 0 23,267,656 129,309 23,138,347 79,696 294,000 9,661,128 92,310 758,830 ........................ ........................ 1,132,568 223,691 908,877 593,304 29,000 7,496,000 ........................ 1,750,000 ........................ 1,550,000 3,446,000 ........................ 3,466,000 ........................ ........................ 48,626,859 100,000 3,050,000 1,141,000 1,550,000 27,846,224 353,000 27,493,224 673,000 323,000 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Aug 07, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 153 (Thursday, August 8, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38937-38941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17016]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request--Reasons for Underredemption of the WIC Cash-Value 
Benefit

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment 
on this proposed information collection for Reasons for Underredemption 
of the WIC Cash-Value Benefit. This collection is a NEW information 
collection.
    This study informs the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food and 
Nutrition Service (FNS) about the reasons behind underredemption of the 
cash-value benefit (CVB) issued to participants in the Special 
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). 
FNS is particularly interested in how CVB redemption rates are affected 
by State agency policies and practices.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 7, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to Ruth Morgan, Food and Nutrition 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 
1014, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be submitted via fax to 
the attention of Ruth Morgan at 703-305-2576 or via email at 
[email protected]. Comments will also be accepted through the 
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the online instructions at https://www.regulations.gov for submitting comments electronically.
    All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the 
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will 
be a matter of public record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of this information collection should be directed to Ruth Morgan 
at 703-457-7759.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on (a) whether the 
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden 
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    Title: Reasons for Underredemption of the WIC Cash-Value Benefit.
    Form Number: N/A.
    OMB Number: Not Yet Assigned.
    Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined.
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Abstract: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, 
Infants, and Children (WIC) provides nutritious supplemental foods, 
healthcare referrals, breastfeeding support, and nutrition education to 
low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and postpartum women, infants and 
children up to age 5 who are at nutritional risk. A Final Rule was 
published in the Federal Register on March 4, 2014 (79 FR 12273) that 
revised the WIC food packages to add a monthly cash-value benefit (CVB) 
for the purchase of fruits and vegetables. This rule also detailed 
specific provisions for the value of the CVB, the types of fruits and 
vegetables authorized, and other State options for providing this 
benefit. Recent studies have estimated that redemption rates for CVBs 
range from 73 percent to 77 percent; 1 2 however, the 
reasons for

[[Page 38938]]

underredemption of this benefit have not been fully explored. FNS has 
funded this study to determine the barriers to CVB redemption and the 
effects of State agency policies, practices, and other factors on CVB 
redemption rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Phillips, D., Bell, L., Morgan, R., & Pooler, J. (2014). 
Transition to EBT in WIC: Review of impact and examination of 
participant redemption patterns: Final report. Retrieved from 
https://altarum.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-publication-files/Altarum_Transition%20to%20WIC%20EBT_Final%20Report_071614.pdf.
    \2\ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 
(2017). Review of WIC food packages: Improving balance and choice: 
Final report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.17226/23655.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are a variety of WIC State agency policies and practices that 
may contribute to CVB underredemption, including but not limited to: 
vendor authorization and selection policies, the forms of fruits and 
vegetables allowed, vendor minimum stocking requirements, and 
participant tools and training available. Other State and household 
factors may also affect redemption rates, such as geographic access to 
WIC vendors or household preferences for certain types of fruits and 
vegetables.
    In order to identify the factors associated with CVB redemption and 
examine the effects of State agency policies and practices on CVB 
redemption rates, FNS is conducting a study in 12 States, with more in-
depth data collection occurring in 4 of these States. The study will 
gather data from WIC State plans and policy documents, administrative 
records, and WIC participants. State plan and policy document data will 
be collected from 12 States and used to identify variations in State 
agency policies and practices that may affect CVB redemption rates. 
Administrative record collection will be limited to electronic benefit 
transfer (EBT) data previously collected from 12 State agencies for the 
WIC Food Cost Containment Practices study (OMB Number 0584-0627, 
Expiration Date 09/30/2020). EBT data will be used to calculate rates 
in each of the 12 study State agencies and, in conjunction with the 
policy data, will be used to assess the ways in which redemption rates 
vary with differences in policies and practices. Participant and State 
agency staff interviews in 4 of the 12 States will be used to 
understand the factors that are most salient to participants in making 
decisions about purchasing fruits and vegetables with their CVB and 
barriers to redemption. FNS will select two States with low CVB 
redemption rates, one State with an intermediate redemption rate, and 
one State with a high redemption rate for participant and State agency 
staff interviews.
    Affected Public: (1) State, local, and tribal governments; (2) 
nonprofits; and (3) individuals. Identified respondent groups include 
the following:
    1. State, local, and tribal governments: State agency staff in four 
States, local agency staff at six local agencies, and clinic staff at 
six clinics.
    2. Nonprofits: Staff at two local agencies and two WIC clinics.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Local agencies and clinics may be either government or 
nonprofit organizations. It is assumed that no contacted local 
agencies or clinics will refuse to participate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Individuals: WIC participants in four study States.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated number of 
respondents is 317 (20 State and local government staff, 4 nonprofit 
staff, and 293 individuals). Of the 317 respondents to be contacted, 
257 are expected to be responsive, and 60 are expected to be 
nonresponsive. The breakout follows:
    1. 20 State and local government staff: Of 8 State agency staff to 
be contacted across 4 States, 8 are expected to be responsive; of 6 
local agency staff contacted across 6 local agencies, 6 are expected to 
be responsive; of 6 clinic staff contacted across 6 clinics, 6 are 
expected to be responsive.
    2. 4 nonprofit staff: Of 2 local agency staff contacted across 2 
local agencies, 2 are expected to be responsive; of 2 clinic staff to 
be contacted across 2 clinics, 2 are expected to be responsive.
    3. 293 individuals: 9 individuals are expected to participate in a 
pretest. Of 284 individuals to be contacted for the main study, 144 are 
expected to be responsive.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 4.5, based on the 
estimated 1,417 total annual responses (1,277 responsive and 140 
nonresponsive) to be made by the 317 respondents. See table 1 for the 
estimated number of responses per respondent for each type of 
respondent. The breakout follows:
    1. WIC State agency staff: The estimated number of responses per 
State agency staff is three. Four State agency staff will receive and 
respond to advance materials and scheduling; the same four State agency 
staff will take part in a recruitment call. Up to eight State agency 
staff will participate in a semistructured interview.
    2. WIC local agency staff (including state, local, and tribal 
governments and non-profits): The estimated number of responses per 
local agency staff is four. Eight local agency staff will receive and 
respond to advance materials and scheduling; the same eight local 
agency staff will take part in a recruitment call.
    3. WIC clinic staff (including state, local, and tribal governments 
and non-profits): The estimated number of responses per local clinic 
staff is four. Eight clinic staff will receive and respond to advance 
materials and scheduling; the same 8 clinic staff will take part in a 
recruitment call.
    4. Individuals (WIC participants): The estimated number of 
responses per individual is 5.10. In total, nine individuals will 
participate in a pretest. 284 individuals will receive a study 
brochure. Of the 164 who are eligible to participate, 112 will fill out 
the signup sheet for in-person interviews, and 52 will fill out the 
signup sheet for phone interviews. Of the 164 who fill out signup 
sheets, 20 will not respond.
    Estimated Total Annual Responses: 1,417 (1,277 annual responses for 
responsive participants and 140 annual responses for nonresponsive 
participants).
    Estimated Time per Response: The estimated average response time is 
0.12 hours for all respondents (0.12 hours for responsive participants 
and 0.05 hours for nonresponsive participants). The estimated time of 
response varies from 30 seconds (0.0083 hours) to 1 hour depending on 
respondent group and activity, as shown in table 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 163.38 hours (156.38 
hours for responsive participants, and 7.0 hours for nonresponsive 
participants). See table 1 for estimated total annual burden for each 
type of respondent.
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P

[[Page 38939]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN08AU19.026


[[Page 38940]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN08AU19.027



[[Page 38941]]


    Dated: July 26, 2019.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-17016 Filed 8-7-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-30-C


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.