Electronic Delivery of Notices to Broadcast Television Stations; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative, 37979-37985 [2019-16338]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
516–228–7330; fax: 516–794–5531; email:
9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que´bec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone: 514–855–5000; fax: 514–
855–7401; email: thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; internet: https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July
29, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–16571 Filed 8–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–2002–0001, by mail to Damian
Duda, Remedial Project Manager, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2, 290 Broadway, New York,
New York 10007–1866. Comments may
also be submitted electronically or
through hand delivery/courier by
following the detailed instructions in
the ADDRESSES section of the direct final
rule located in the rules section of this
issue of the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Damian Duda, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 2, 290 Broadway, New
York, New York 10007–1866, (212) 637–
4269, email: duda.damian@epa.gov.
In the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
issue of the Federal Register, we are
publishing a direct final Notice of
Deletion of the Ellenville Scrap Iron and
Metal Superfund Site without prior
Notice of Intent to Delete because we
view this as a noncontroversial revision
and anticipate no adverse comment. We
have explained our reasons for this
deletion in the preamble to the direct
final Notice of Deletion, and those
reasons are incorporated herein. If we
receive no adverse comment(s) on this
deletion action, we will not take further
action on this Notice of Intent to Delete.
If we receive adverse comment(s), we
will withdraw the direct final Notice of
Deletion, and the deletion will not take
effect. We will, as appropriate, address
all public comments in a subsequent
final Notice of Deletion based on this
Notice of Intent to Delete. If there is no
withdrawal of this Notice of Iintent to
Delete, we will not institute a second
comment period on this Notice of Intent
to Delete. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time.
For additional information, see the
direct final Notice of Deletion which is
located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this issue of the Federal
Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2002–0001; FRL–9997–
64–Region 2]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion
of the Ellenville Scrap Iron and Metal
Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 2 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete the Ellenville
Scrap Iron and Metal Superfund Site
(Site), located in the Village of
Ellenville, Town of Wawarsing, Ulster
County, New York, from the National
Priorities List (NPL) and requests public
comments on this proposed action. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to section
105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and
the State of New York, through the
Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC), have
determined that all appropriate
response actions under CERCLA, other
than operation and maintenance,
monitoring, and five-year reviews, have
been completed. However, this deletion
does not preclude future response
actions under Superfund.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 4, 2019.
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR,
2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,
3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52
FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37979
Dated: July 24, 2019.
Peter D. Lopez,
Regional Administrator EPA, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2019–16702 Filed 8–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 74 and 76
[MB Docket Nos. 19–165, 17–105; FCC 19–
68]
Electronic Delivery of Notices to
Broadcast Television Stations;
Modernization of Media Regulation
Initiative
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) proposes to require that
cable operators use email to deliver
certain written notices to broadcast
television stations. The proposal would
require cable operators to email the
notices to a designated inbox in the
station’s online public inspection file
(OPIF). The FCC seeks comment on
whether satellite TV providers should
similarly be required to use email to
deliver certain written notices to
broadcast TV stations. In addition, the
FCC also seeks comment on whether
and how the proposal to require
electronic delivery of notices can be
applied to certain low power TV and
noncommercial translator stations that
are not required to maintain an OPIF.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
September 4, 2019, and reply comments
are due on or before September 19,
2019.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by MB Docket Nos. 19–165
and 17–105, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal Communications
Commission’s website: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
37980
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Christopher Clark of
the Industry Analysis Division, Media
Bureau at Christopher.Clark@fcc.gov, or
(202) 418–2609.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 19–
68, adopted and released on July 10,
2019. The full text of this document is
available electronically via the FCC’s
Electronic Document Management
System (EDOCS) website at https://
www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposesupdates-cable-satellite-tv-providernotifications-0. Documents will be
available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.
This document is also available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Information Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, CY–A257, Washington, DC
20554. Alternative formats are available
for people with disabilities (Braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format) by sending an email to fcc504@
fcc.gov or calling the Commission’s
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Synopsis
1. In this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM), we propose to take
additional steps to modernize the
notification requirements in part 76 of
our rules governing cable television and
other multichannel video programming
services. Currently, the written
notification requirements for cable
operators are set forth in section
76.64(k) and subpart T of the
Commission’s rules, and the written
notification requirements for direct
broadcast satellite (DBS) providers are
contained in sections 76.54(e) and 76.66
of the Commission’s rules. These rules
direct cable operators and DBS
providers, respectively, to give written
notice to a local broadcast television
station prior to deleting or repositioning
the station, changing the location of the
principal headend or local receive
facility, or commencing service in a
market, among other things. In addition
to the required notices to broadcast
television stations, the rules in subpart
T also require that cable operators
deliver written notices to their
subscribers in certain circumstances.
2. In December 2017, in response to
proposals in the Modernization of
Media Regulation Initiative proceeding
calling for the modernization of these
various notice requirements, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
Commission released the Subscriber
and Carriage Election Notices NPRM,
MB Docket Nos. 17–317 and 17–105,
FCC 17–168, which proposed to allow
electronic delivery of subpart T and
privacy notices to subscribers if sent to
a verified email address and subject to
certain safeguards. In addition, the
Subscriber and Carriage Election
Notices NPRM sought comment on how
to update the requirement in sections
76.64(h) and 76.66(d) of the
Commission’s rules that local broadcast
stations electing carriage on a cable
system send such written election
notices by certified mail. The
Commission subsequently adopted the
proposals pertaining to electronic
delivery of notices to subscribers and
stated that the issue of carriage election
notices made by broadcast television
stations would be addressed in a future
order. In September 2018, the American
Cable Association (ACA), National
Association of Broadcasters (NAB), and
NCTA—The internet and Television
Association (NCTA) met with
Commission staff to discuss a proposal
that contemplated requiring carriage
election notices to be delivered via
email. NAB and NCTA subsequently
proposed that the Commission add a
new field to both the online public
inspection file (OPIF) and the Cable
Operations and Licensing System
(COALs) in order for commercial
broadcast television stations and cable
operators to provide carriage election
contact information, including an email
address and phone number.
3. In a separate filing submitted in the
carriage election notices modernization
proceeding on October 16, 2018, ACA
proposed that the Commission take
‘‘comparable steps’’ with respect to the
notices required by section 76.64(k) and
subpart T if the Commission allows
carriage election notices to be delivered
by means other than certified mail.
Specifically, ACA contended that cable
operators be permitted to provide the
following types of notices to broadcast
stations electronically:
• Intent to commence service (47 CFR
76.64(k)): Requires that a cable system
commencing new operation notify all
local commercial and noncommercial
broadcast stations of its intent to
commence service. The cable operator
must send such notification, by certified
mail, at least 60 days prior to
commencing cable service.
• Activation of a cable system (47
CFR 76.1617): Requires that within 60
days of activation of a cable system, a
cable operator must notify all qualified
noncommercial educational (NCE)
stations of the location of its designated
principal headend by certified mail;
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
notify all local commercial and NCE
stations that may not be entitled to
carriage because they either fail to meet
the standards for delivery of a good
quality signal to the cable system’s
principal headend or may cause
increased copyright liability to the cable
system; and send by certified mail a
copy of a list of all broadcast television
stations carried by the cable system and
their channel positions to all local
commercial and noncommercial
television stations, including those not
designated as must-carry stations and
those not carried on the system.
• Deletion or repositioning of
broadcast signals (47 CFR 76.1601):
Requires that a cable operator provide
written notice to any broadcast
television station at least 30 days prior
to either deleting from carriage or
repositioning that station.
• Principal headend (47 CFR
76.1607): Requires that a cable operator
provide written notice by certified mail
to all stations carried on its system
pursuant to the must-carry rules at least
60 days prior to any change in the
designation of the location of the
principal headend.
• System technical integration
requiring uniform election of must-carry
or retransmission consent status (47
CFR 76.1608): Requires a cable system
that changes its technical configuration
in such a way as to integrate two
formerly separate cable systems to give
90 days’ notice of its intention to do so
to any television broadcast stations that
have elected must carry with respect to
one system and retransmission consent
status with respect to the other.
• Non-duplication and syndicated
exclusivity (47 CFR 76.1609): Requires
that within 60 days following the
provision of service to 1,000
subscribers, the operator of each such
system must file a notice to that effect
with the Commission, and serve a copy
of that notice on every television station
that would be entitled to exercise
network non-duplication protection or
syndicated exclusivity protection
against it.
4. As discussed further below, we
propose to revise our rules to require
that cable operators deliver
electronically to broadcast television
stations the written notices required by
section 76.64(k) and subpart T of our
rules via email to an email address
designated by the station in its OPIF.
We believe that modernizing our rules
to require electronic delivery of certain
written notices in this manner is
consistent with how companies do
business in the marketplace and will
result in quicker, more effective
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
communication of necessary
information.
5. Specifically, we propose that
written notices from cable operators
would be required to be delivered
electronically to television stations in
all the circumstances cited by ACA
above: Informing local broadcast
stations that a new cable system intends
to commence service (section 76.64(k));
sending required information to local
broadcast stations when a new cable
system is activated (section 76.1617);
notifying a television station about the
deletion or repositioning of its signal
(section 76.1601); informing stations of
a change in the designation of the
principal headend of a cable operator
(section 76.1607); informing stations
that a cable operator intends to integrate
two cable systems, requiring a uniform
carriage election (section 76.1608); and
notifying stations that a cable system
serves 1,000 or more subscribers and is
no longer exempt from the
Commission’s network non-duplication
and syndicated exclusivity rules
(section 76.1609). Consistent with the
Commission’s decision in a companion
order adopted today to require
electronic delivery of carriage election
notices, we tentatively conclude that
our rules should also require that the
notices described above to television
stations be delivered to the email
address designated by the television
station in the OPIF.
6. We tentatively conclude that
requiring cable operators to deliver such
notices to broadcast television stations
via email would serve the public
interest. As discussed above, the
Commission has already decided in a
companion order adopted today to
require that carriage election notices
from television stations be delivered to
MVPDs electronically via email.
Similarly, the Commission allows cable
operators to use email to deliver subpart
T and privacy notices to subscribers if
the cable operator complies with certain
consumer safeguards, including the use
of a verified email address for each
subscriber. The Commission found that
the benefits of permitting email delivery
of subscriber notices include increased
efficiency and the positive
environmental aspects of saving
substantial amounts of paper annually,
among other things. We tentatively
conclude that similar policy
considerations also favor the use of
electronic delivery for notices from
cable operators to broadcast television
stations, such as decreasing the amount
of paper used, reducing burdens on
cable operators, and enabling television
broadcasters and cable operators to
more easily track the information they
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
need to fulfill their obligations under
the Commission’s rules. We seek
comment on our tentative conclusion
that the public interest would be served
by our proposal to require electronic
delivery of notices mandated by section
76.64(k) and the rules in subpart T
listed above. Alternatively, is there any
reason why a cable operator should
retain the option to deliver such notices
to broadcast television stations in a nonelectronic format, such as via certified
mail?
7. We tentatively conclude that the
Commission has authority under the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (the Act), to require the
section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices
from cable operators to broadcast
stations to be delivered electronically
via email. Pursuant to sections 4 and
303 of the Act, the Commission may
exercise broad authority to adopt rules
and regulations as necessary to execute
its functions and carry out the
provisions of the Act. In addition,
section 614 of the Act provides the
Commission with broad authority to
issue regulations, including the
notification requirements in section
76.64(k) and subpart T of our rules,
implementing the must-carry
requirements prescribed by the Act.
While sections 614(b)(9) and 615(g)(3) of
the Act require that ‘‘written notice’’ be
provided before repositioning or
deleting a local television station on the
cable system, we tentatively conclude
that electronic delivery of the notices
via email satisfies this ‘‘written notice’’
requirement. As the Commission has
found previously, emails, by their very
nature, convey information in writing.
We seek comment on these tentative
conclusions.
8. To ensure that television stations
continue to receive notices from cable
operators as required by section 76.64(k)
and subpart T, we tentatively conclude
that after July 31, 2020, a cable operator
should be required to distribute such
notices to television stations
electronically via email to an email
address designated by the station. In the
Carriage Election Notice Modernization
Order and FNPRM, MB Docket Nos. 17–
317 and 17–105, FCC 19–69, the
Commission adopted new rules
requiring that all broadcast stations
subject to the rules must maintain in the
OPIF an up-to-date email address and
phone number for carriage-related
questions by July 31, 2020. Similarly,
with respect to the written notices that
cable operators are required to provide
to television stations pursuant to section
76.64(k) and subpart T, we propose to
require that after July 31, 2020, all such
notices must be delivered electronically
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37981
to the carriage election email address
designated by the station in the OPIF.
We tentatively conclude that requiring
the use of a designated email address
that the station posts to the OPIF will
help ensure that cable operators are
easily able to identify the correct email
address for delivering notices
electronically to commercial and
noncommercial full-power and Class A
television stations and that such contact
information is current. Stations are
expected to update the OPIF in a timely
fashion and to maintain an orderly
OPIF. We seek comment on these
tentative conclusions.
9. In some circumstances, a cable
operator may be required to provide
section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices to
low power television (LPTV) stations
that are not Class A stations or to certain
NCE translator stations, neither of
which are subject to the OPIF rules.
Because these stations would need to
use alternative means to publicize a
designated email address for receiving
notices electronically, we seek comment
below on how our proposal to require
electronic delivery of notices can be best
applied to LPTV stations that are not
Class A stations and to qualified NCE
translator stations, to the extent they are
entitled to receive the notices prescribed
by section 76.64(k) and subpart T of our
rules. The extent to which an LPTV
station is entitled to receive notices
pursuant to section 76.64(k) and subpart
T of our rules depends on whether the
station is a ‘‘qualified’’ LPTV station as
defined in section 614 of the Act and
section 76.55(d) of our rules. A qualified
LPTV station can be either a Class A
television station or a non-Class A LPTV
station under section 614 of the Act. To
be ‘‘qualified,’’ an LPTV station must
satisfy certain criteria. Unlike qualified
LPTV stations, non-qualified LPTV
stations do not have the option to elect
must-carry status; however, like other
broadcast stations, non-qualified LPTV
stations are eligible to negotiate carriage
pursuant to retransmission consent
agreements. The Commission has
previously concluded that qualified
LPTV stations are entitled to receive
notice from a cable operator at least 30
days before the operator deletes or
repositions the station, in accordance
with section 76.1601 of our rules. To the
extent that non-qualified LPTV stations
are carried on a cable system pursuant
to retransmission consent, however,
such stations are also entitled to receive
notices of deletion or repositioning
pursuant to section 76.1601. Similarly,
qualified LPTV stations that elect mustcarry are entitled to receive the notices
required by sections 76.64(k), 76.1607,
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
37982
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
and 76.1617(b). In contrast, LPTV
stations are not entitled to receive nonduplication and syndicated exclusivity
notices under section 76.1609, because
our rules do not entitle these stations to
exercise network non-duplication or
syndicated exclusivity protection.
Similarly, LPTV stations are not entitled
to receive notices under sections
76.1608 and 76.1617(c), because these
rules require notice only to ‘‘television
broadcast stations’’ or ‘‘television
stations,’’ which, as defined in section
76.5(b) of our rules, excludes LPTV
stations. Finally, with respect to section
76.1617(a), which requires notices only
to ‘‘qualified NCE stations,’’ LPTV
stations are entitled to such notices only
to the extent they meet the definition of
qualified NCE television station set forth
in section 76.55(a) of our rules.
10. Because Class A stations, like fullpower television stations, are subject to
the OPIF rules, including the
requirement to provide carriage election
contact information in the OPIF, our
proposal would require the use of the
designated carriage election email
address for electronic delivery of section
76.64(k) and subpart T notices to Class
A stations. We seek comment on
whether and how our proposal to
require electronic delivery of section
76.64(k) and subpart T notices can be
applied with respect to LPTV stations
that are not Class A stations and to
translator stations that meet the
definition of a ‘‘qualified NCE television
station’’ under section 615(l)(1) of the
Act (qualified NCE translator stations).
Unlike full-power and Class A
television stations, non-Class A LPTV
stations and qualified NCE translator
stations are not subject to our OPIF
rules. Accordingly, LPTV stations
without Class A status and qualified
NCE translator stations may need to use
an alternative means to publicize a
designated email address for receiving
section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices if
the notices are to be delivered to them
electronically after July 31, 2020.1 One
potential approach, as discussed in the
Carriage Election Notice Modernization
Order and FNPRM, is to require that
LPTV stations and qualified NCE
translator stations post any required
public-facing information on the first
page of a company website. We seek
comment on this approach and whether
we should adopt a rule requiring that on
or before July 31, 2020, LPTV stations
and qualified NCE translator stations
that are entitled to receive section
76.64(k) and subpart T notices must
designate an email address for receiving
1 For purposes of this paragraph, our focus is on
those LPTV stations without Class A status.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
such notices electronically. This
proposed timeframe is consistent with
the timeframe in which commercial and
noncommercial full-power television
stations must add their carriage election
contact information to the OPIF. Is it
reasonable to expect that all LPTV
stations and qualified NCE translator
stations will have an existing publicfacing company website, i.e., one that is
easily accessible for free by the general
public, on which they could publicize a
designated email address for receiving
the notices required by section 76.64(k)
and subpart T? Would this approach
ensure that cable operators are able to
easily identify the designated email
address for delivering the required
notices to such stations? Are there other
alternatives that would provide similar
access to this information at minimal
cost and with minimal burden? For
instance, to the extent that qualified
NCE translator stations are co-owned
with the primary station, should we
simply require that section 76.64(k) and
subpart T notices to these stations be
delivered electronically to the carriageelection email address designated by the
primary station in its OPIF, rather than
requiring that such translator stations
post a designated email address on the
company website? We seek comment on
these issues.
11. We seek comment on the specific
benefits that would accrue from our
proposals and whether they would pose
any burdens on cable operators and
broadcast television stations. Would our
proposed approach reduce the time and
money spent on delivering and/or
receiving the required written notices
while ensuring that stations continue to
receive them in a timely manner? Are
there any circumstances in which a
television station, or subset of television
stations such as LPTV stations or
qualified NCE translator stations, should
be allowed to opt out of electronic
delivery and continue receiving the
notices via certified mail or in a nonelectronic format? Are there other
alternative means of delivering these
notices that would better serve the
needs of broadcasters and cable
operators but still be less burdensome?
How would such approaches work in
practice? We seek comment on these
issues.
12. New section 76.1600 of the
Commission’s rules was adopted by the
Commission in the Subscriber Notices
Order and FNPRM, MB Docket Nos. 17–
317 and 17–105, FCC 18–166, and the
rule allows MVPDs to deliver subscriber
privacy notifications and other written
information electronically to subscribers
and customers via email so long as the
MVPD complies with certain consumer
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
safeguards. We propose to add to
section 76.1600 a new subsection
requiring that the written information
provided by cable operators to broadcast
television stations under section
76.64(k) and subpart T must be
delivered to the station electronically
via email to the email address
designated by the station in the OPIF.
As discussed above, we seek comment
on whether non-Class A LPTV stations
and qualified NCE translator stations
should be required to post an email
address on the first page of their
websites. To avoid potential
discrepancies with our proposed
revision to section 76.1600, we also
propose minor amendments to sections
76.64(k), 76.1607, 76.1609, and 76.1617
of our rules. Currently, sections
76.64(k), 76.1607, and 76.1617 each
require that certain written information
be provided to broadcast stations ‘‘by
certified mail.’’ Similarly, section
76.1609 currently requires that certain
notices be mailed to television stations
or delivered to stations by hand.2 We
propose to add language to sections
76.64(k), 76.1607, 76.1609, and 76.1617
to reflect our proposal that cable
operators be required to deliver the
notices electronically to broadcast
television stations via email in
accordance with our proposed revision
to section 76.1600. Finally, we also
propose to make a minor correction to
our rules in part 74 by moving our
existing channel sharing rule for LPTV
and TV translator stations from subpart
H (Low Power Auxiliary Stations) to
subpart G (Low Power TV, TV
Translator, and TV Booster Stations).
Our channel sharing rule for LPTV and
TV translator stations is set forth in
section 74.799. Because the rules in
subpart G apply to LPTV stations, TV
translator stations, and TV booster
stations, subpart G is a more appropriate
location for section 74.799 than subpart
H, which contains rules for low power
auxiliary stations that transmit over
distances of approximately 100 meters
for uses such as wireless microphones,
cue and control communications, and
synchronization of TV camera signals.
We seek comment on the proposed rule
amendments discussed above and any
other rule changes that are necessary to
2 In addition to serving copies of the notice on the
relevant television stations, the cable operator must
also file the original copy of the notice with the
Commission within 60 days following the provision
of service to 1,000 subscribers. We are not
proposing to change this aspect of the rule, which,
unlike the requirements discussed above, does not
require notices from cable operators to broadcast
stations.
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
implement the proposals discussed
herein.
13. Sections 76.54(e) and 76.66 of our
rules contain notification requirements
for DBS providers that are similar to the
notification requirements for cable
operators discussed above. These
written notices from DBS providers
must be delivered to television stations
in the following circumstances:
Notifying all televisions stations in a
market prior to retransmitting a
significantly viewed station into that
market (section 76.54(e)); notifying local
television stations of the provider’s
intent to launch new local-into-local
service in the local market (section
76.66(d)(2)(i) through (ii)); notifying
local television stations of the provider’s
intent to launch HD carry-one, carry-all
in the local market (section
76.66(d)(2)(vi)); informing each local
television station of the provider’s
intent to fulfil or deny the station’s
carriage request and the reasons for
declining (section 76.66(d)(1)(iv),
(d)(2)(v), (d)(3)(iv)); identifying each
affiliate of the same television network
that the DBS provider reserves the right
to retransmit into a station’s local
market during the next carriage election
cycle (section 76.66(d)(5)(i)); informing
local television stations of the location
of the DBS provider’s local receive
facility or its intent to relocate such
facility (section 76.66(f)(3) through (4));
notifying local television stations when
deleting a station that substantially
duplicates another or adding a station
that no longer duplicates another
(section 76.66(h)(5)). We seek comment
on whether the Commission should also
require that DBS providers deliver such
notices to broadcast television stations
electronically after July 31, 2020, if the
Commission adopts such a requirement
for cable operators. The Satellite Home
Viewer Extension and Reauthorization
Act of 2004 added section 338(h)(2) of
the Act and directed the Commission to
revise its rules requiring that DBS
providers notify local television stations
prior to launching local-into-local
service in a market. Section 338(h)(2)(C)
of the Act states that ‘‘[s]uch regulations
shall require that each satellite carrier
shall transmit the notices required by
such regulation via certified mail to the
address for such television station
licensee listed in the consolidated
database system maintained by the
Commission.’’ We seek comment on
whether the statute creates an ongoing
obligation for the Commission to
maintain this certified mail notice
requirement by regulation, or whether,
once having revised our rules to satisfy
section 338(h)(2)(A), we have the ability
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
to change our notification rules
pursuant to the standard notice-andcomment rulemaking process. Does
section 338(h)(2) of the Act currently
limit the Commission’s authority to
require electronic delivery of the notices
that DBS providers must send to local
television stations prior to launching
local-into-local service in the local
market? Are all the DBS notice rules
subject to the restriction in section
338(h)(2), or are there some that fall
outside that provision? What are the
specific benefits and burdens of
electronic delivery of the notices
required by sections 76.54(e) and 76.66
for both broadcasters and DBS
providers? If the Commission decides to
require that certain such notices be
delivered via email, how should the
Commission revise sections 76.54(e) and
76.66 to implement such a requirement?
We seek comment on these issues.
14. Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA), the Commission has prepared
this present Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) concerning
the possible significant economic
impact on small entities by the policies
and rules proposed in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Written
public comments are requested on this
IRFA. Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the deadlines for comments provided
on the first page of the NPRM. The
Commission will send a copy of the
NPRM, including this IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA). In
summary, the NPRM proposes to revise
the Commission’s rules to require that
cable operators distribute certain notices
required by section 76.64(k) and subpart
T of the Commission’s rules to broadcast
television stations electronically via
email to the email address designated by
the station as carriage election contact
information in the online public file
(OPIF). The NPRM seeks comment on
whether and how the proposal to
require electronic delivery of the section
76.64(k) and subpart T notices can be
applied with respect to LPTV stations
without Class A status and to translator
stations that meet the definition of a
‘‘qualified NCE television station’’
under section 615(l)(1) of the
Communications Act. In addition, the
NPRM also seeks comment on whether
to similarly require electronic delivery
of certain notices that direct broadcast
satellite (DBS) providers are required to
send to broadcast television stations
under sections 76.54(e) and 76.66 of the
Commission’s rules. The proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37983
action is authorized pursuant to sections
1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 338, 340, 614, and
615 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i),
154(j), 303(r), 338, 340, 534, and 535.
The types of small entities that may be
affected by the proposals contained in
the NPRM fall within the following
categories: Cable Companies and
Systems (Rate Regulation Standard);
Cable System Operators
(Telecommunications Act Standard);
Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) Service;
and Television Broadcasting. The NPRM
proposes to revise existing reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements by modernizing certain
notification requirements for cable
operators and DBS providers to require
the use of email rather than paper
delivery. There is no overlap with other
regulations or laws. The NPRM seeks
comment on other alternative means of
delivering the notices that would better
serve the needs of broadcasters and
MVPDs, including small entities, but
still be less burdensome than sending
the notices by paper delivery.
15. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act
Analysis. This document may result in
new or revised information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3501 through 3520). If the
Commission adopts any new or revised
information collection requirement, the
Commission will publish a notice in the
Federal Register inviting the public to
comment on the requirement, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). In addition,
pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4),
the Commission seeks specific comment
on how it might ‘‘further reduce the
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.’’
16. Ex Parte Rules—Permit-ButDisclose. The proceeding this Notice
initiates shall be treated as a ‘‘permitbut-disclose’’ proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules,
47 CFR 1.1200 et seq. Persons making ex
parte presentations must file a copy of
any written presentation or a
memorandum summarizing any oral
presentation within two business days
after the presentation (unless a different
deadline applicable to the Sunshine
period applies). Persons making oral ex
parte presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
37984
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with rule
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
rule 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
17. The proposed action is authorized
pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r),
338, 340, 614, and 615 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i),
154(j), 303(r), 338, 340, 534, and 535.
List of Subjects
Communications equipment,
Education, Radio, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research,
Television.
47 CFR Part 76
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Administrative practice and
procedure, Cable television, Equal
employment opportunity, Political
candidates, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
§ 76.66
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, 307,
309, 310, 336, and 554.
■
2. Add § 74.779 to read as follows:
§ 74.779 Electronic Delivery of Notices to
LPTV stations.
Beginning July 31, 2020, each licensee
of a low power television station or
translator station that is entitled to
receive notices pursuant to section
76.64(k), 76.1601, 76.1607, or 76.1617 of
this title shall post publicly on the main
page of station’s website an email
address for electronic receipt of such
notices by the station. This section does
not apply to Class A television stations.
■ 3. Transfer § 74.799 from subpart H to
subpart G.
PART 76—MULTICHANNEL VIDEO
AND CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE
4. The authority for part 76 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154,
301, 302, 302a, 303, 303a, 307, 308, 309, 312,
315, 317, 325, 338, 339, 340, 341, 503, 521,
522, 531, 532, 534, 535, 536, 537, 543, 544,
544a, 545, 548, 549, 552, 554, 556, 558, 560,
561, 571, 572, 573.
5. Amend § 76.54 by revising the last
sentence of paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
■
§ 76.54 Significantly viewed signals;
method to be followed for special
showings.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
parts 74 and 76 as follows:
Jkt 247001
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * Such written notice must
be delivered to stations electronically in
accordance with section 76.66(d)(2)(ii)
of this subpart D.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 76.64 by revising the
second sentence of paragraph (k) to read
as follows:
Retransmission consent.
*
Proposed Rules
18:40 Aug 02, 2019
1. The authority for part 74 continues
to read as follows:
■
§ 76.64
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
■
*
47 CFR Part 74
d. Adding a second sentence to
paragraph (h)(5).
The additions and revision read as
follows:
PART 74—EXPERIMENTAL RADIO,
AUXILIARY, SPECIAL BROADCAST
AND OTHER PROGRAM
DISTRIBUTIONAL SERVICES
*
*
*
*
(k) * * * The cable operator must
send such notification by electronic
delivery, in accordance with § 76.1600,
at least 60 days prior to commencing
cable service. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 76.66 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(iv)
introductory text;
■ b. Adding a second sentence to
paragraphs (d)(2)(ii), (v), (vi), (d)(3)(iv),
(d)(5)(i), (f)(3);
■ c. Adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (f)(4); and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Satellite broadcast signal carriage.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Within 30 days of receiving a
television station’s carriage request, a
satellite carrier shall notify in writing
electronically in accordance with
paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * The written notices
required by paragraphs (d)(1)(iv),
(d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(5)(i),
(f)(3), (f)(4), and (h)(5) of this section
shall be delivered electronically via
email to the email address for carriagerelated questions that the station lists in
its public file in accordance with
§§ 73.3626 and 73.3527 of part 73 of this
title.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * * The written notices
required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of
this section.
(vi) * * * The written notices
required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(iv) * * * The written notices
required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of
this section.
(5) * * *
(i) * * * The written notices
required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(3) * * * The written notices
required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of
this section.
(4) * * * The written notices
required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(5) * * * The required notice to the
affected television station shall be
delivered to the station electronically in
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Proposed Rules
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 76.1600 by adding
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 76.1600
Electronic delivery of notices.
*
*
*
*
(e) Written information provided by
cable operators to broadcast stations
pursuant to §§ 76.64(k), 76.1601,
76.1607, 76.1608, 76.1609, and 76.1617
of this Part 76 must be delivered
electronically to a station via email to
the email address for carriage-related
questions that the television broadcast
station lists in its public file in
accordance with §§ 73.3626 and 73.3527
of Part 73 of this title, or in the case of
low power television stations or
translator stations, to the email address
that the station posts on its website in
accordance with § 74.779 of Part 74 of
this title.
■ 9. Revise § 76.1607 to read as follows:
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
§ 76.1607
Principal headend.
§ 76.1609 Non-duplication and syndicated
exclusivity.
Within 60 days following the
provision of service to 1,000
subscribers, the operator of each such
system shall file a notice to that effect
with the Commission, and provide a
copy of that notice, by electronic
delivery in accordance with § 76.1600,
to every television station that would be
entitled to exercise network nonduplication protection or syndicated
exclusivity protection against the
operator.
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
11. Amend § 76.1617 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as follows:
■
A cable operator shall provide written
notice by electronic delivery, in
accordance with § 76.1600, to all
stations carried on its system pursuant
to the must-carry rules at least 60 days
prior to any change in the designation
of its principal headend.
■ 10. Revise § 76.1609 to read as
follows:
PO 00000
37985
§ 76.1617
Initial must-carry notice.
(a) Within 60 days of activation of a
cable system, a cable operator must
notify all qualified NCE stations of its
designated principal headend by
electronic delivery in accordance with
§ 76.1600.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Within 60 days of activation of a
cable system, a cable operator must
send, by electronic delivery in
accordance with § 76.1600, a copy of a
list of all broadcast television stations
carried by its system and their channel
positions to all local commercial and
noncommercial television stations,
including those not designated as mustcarry stations and those not carried on
the system.
[FR Doc. 2019–16338 Filed 8–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37979-37985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16338]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 74 and 76
[MB Docket Nos. 19-165, 17-105; FCC 19-68]
Electronic Delivery of Notices to Broadcast Television Stations;
Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC
or Commission) proposes to require that cable operators use email to
deliver certain written notices to broadcast television stations. The
proposal would require cable operators to email the notices to a
designated inbox in the station's online public inspection file (OPIF).
The FCC seeks comment on whether satellite TV providers should
similarly be required to use email to deliver certain written notices
to broadcast TV stations. In addition, the FCC also seeks comment on
whether and how the proposal to require electronic delivery of notices
can be applied to certain low power TV and noncommercial translator
stations that are not required to maintain an OPIF.
DATES: Comments are due on or before September 4, 2019, and reply
comments are due on or before September 19, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MB Docket Nos. 19-165
and 17-105, by any of the following methods:
Federal Communications Commission's website: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: [email protected] or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
[[Page 37980]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information on this
proceeding, contact Christopher Clark of the Industry Analysis
Division, Media Bureau at [email protected], or (202) 418-2609.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 19-68, adopted and released on July
10, 2019. The full text of this document is available electronically
via the FCC's Electronic Document Management System (EDOCS) website at
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-updates-cable-satellite-tv-provider-notifications-0. Documents will be available electronically in
ASCII, Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. This document is also
available for public inspection and copying during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW, CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554.
Alternative formats are available for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) by sending an
email to [email protected] or calling the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432
(TTY).
Synopsis
1. In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), we propose to take
additional steps to modernize the notification requirements in part 76
of our rules governing cable television and other multichannel video
programming services. Currently, the written notification requirements
for cable operators are set forth in section 76.64(k) and subpart T of
the Commission's rules, and the written notification requirements for
direct broadcast satellite (DBS) providers are contained in sections
76.54(e) and 76.66 of the Commission's rules. These rules direct cable
operators and DBS providers, respectively, to give written notice to a
local broadcast television station prior to deleting or repositioning
the station, changing the location of the principal headend or local
receive facility, or commencing service in a market, among other
things. In addition to the required notices to broadcast television
stations, the rules in subpart T also require that cable operators
deliver written notices to their subscribers in certain circumstances.
2. In December 2017, in response to proposals in the Modernization
of Media Regulation Initiative proceeding calling for the modernization
of these various notice requirements, the Commission released the
Subscriber and Carriage Election Notices NPRM, MB Docket Nos. 17-317
and 17-105, FCC 17-168, which proposed to allow electronic delivery of
subpart T and privacy notices to subscribers if sent to a verified
email address and subject to certain safeguards. In addition, the
Subscriber and Carriage Election Notices NPRM sought comment on how to
update the requirement in sections 76.64(h) and 76.66(d) of the
Commission's rules that local broadcast stations electing carriage on a
cable system send such written election notices by certified mail. The
Commission subsequently adopted the proposals pertaining to electronic
delivery of notices to subscribers and stated that the issue of
carriage election notices made by broadcast television stations would
be addressed in a future order. In September 2018, the American Cable
Association (ACA), National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), and
NCTA--The internet and Television Association (NCTA) met with
Commission staff to discuss a proposal that contemplated requiring
carriage election notices to be delivered via email. NAB and NCTA
subsequently proposed that the Commission add a new field to both the
online public inspection file (OPIF) and the Cable Operations and
Licensing System (COALs) in order for commercial broadcast television
stations and cable operators to provide carriage election contact
information, including an email address and phone number.
3. In a separate filing submitted in the carriage election notices
modernization proceeding on October 16, 2018, ACA proposed that the
Commission take ``comparable steps'' with respect to the notices
required by section 76.64(k) and subpart T if the Commission allows
carriage election notices to be delivered by means other than certified
mail. Specifically, ACA contended that cable operators be permitted to
provide the following types of notices to broadcast stations
electronically:
Intent to commence service (47 CFR 76.64(k)): Requires
that a cable system commencing new operation notify all local
commercial and noncommercial broadcast stations of its intent to
commence service. The cable operator must send such notification, by
certified mail, at least 60 days prior to commencing cable service.
Activation of a cable system (47 CFR 76.1617): Requires
that within 60 days of activation of a cable system, a cable operator
must notify all qualified noncommercial educational (NCE) stations of
the location of its designated principal headend by certified mail;
notify all local commercial and NCE stations that may not be entitled
to carriage because they either fail to meet the standards for delivery
of a good quality signal to the cable system's principal headend or may
cause increased copyright liability to the cable system; and send by
certified mail a copy of a list of all broadcast television stations
carried by the cable system and their channel positions to all local
commercial and noncommercial television stations, including those not
designated as must-carry stations and those not carried on the system.
Deletion or repositioning of broadcast signals (47 CFR
76.1601): Requires that a cable operator provide written notice to any
broadcast television station at least 30 days prior to either deleting
from carriage or repositioning that station.
Principal headend (47 CFR 76.1607): Requires that a cable
operator provide written notice by certified mail to all stations
carried on its system pursuant to the must-carry rules at least 60 days
prior to any change in the designation of the location of the principal
headend.
System technical integration requiring uniform election of
must-carry or retransmission consent status (47 CFR 76.1608): Requires
a cable system that changes its technical configuration in such a way
as to integrate two formerly separate cable systems to give 90 days'
notice of its intention to do so to any television broadcast stations
that have elected must carry with respect to one system and
retransmission consent status with respect to the other.
Non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity (47 CFR
76.1609): Requires that within 60 days following the provision of
service to 1,000 subscribers, the operator of each such system must
file a notice to that effect with the Commission, and serve a copy of
that notice on every television station that would be entitled to
exercise network non-duplication protection or syndicated exclusivity
protection against it.
4. As discussed further below, we propose to revise our rules to
require that cable operators deliver electronically to broadcast
television stations the written notices required by section 76.64(k)
and subpart T of our rules via email to an email address designated by
the station in its OPIF. We believe that modernizing our rules to
require electronic delivery of certain written notices in this manner
is consistent with how companies do business in the marketplace and
will result in quicker, more effective
[[Page 37981]]
communication of necessary information.
5. Specifically, we propose that written notices from cable
operators would be required to be delivered electronically to
television stations in all the circumstances cited by ACA above:
Informing local broadcast stations that a new cable system intends to
commence service (section 76.64(k)); sending required information to
local broadcast stations when a new cable system is activated (section
76.1617); notifying a television station about the deletion or
repositioning of its signal (section 76.1601); informing stations of a
change in the designation of the principal headend of a cable operator
(section 76.1607); informing stations that a cable operator intends to
integrate two cable systems, requiring a uniform carriage election
(section 76.1608); and notifying stations that a cable system serves
1,000 or more subscribers and is no longer exempt from the Commission's
network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules (section
76.1609). Consistent with the Commission's decision in a companion
order adopted today to require electronic delivery of carriage election
notices, we tentatively conclude that our rules should also require
that the notices described above to television stations be delivered to
the email address designated by the television station in the OPIF.
6. We tentatively conclude that requiring cable operators to
deliver such notices to broadcast television stations via email would
serve the public interest. As discussed above, the Commission has
already decided in a companion order adopted today to require that
carriage election notices from television stations be delivered to
MVPDs electronically via email. Similarly, the Commission allows cable
operators to use email to deliver subpart T and privacy notices to
subscribers if the cable operator complies with certain consumer
safeguards, including the use of a verified email address for each
subscriber. The Commission found that the benefits of permitting email
delivery of subscriber notices include increased efficiency and the
positive environmental aspects of saving substantial amounts of paper
annually, among other things. We tentatively conclude that similar
policy considerations also favor the use of electronic delivery for
notices from cable operators to broadcast television stations, such as
decreasing the amount of paper used, reducing burdens on cable
operators, and enabling television broadcasters and cable operators to
more easily track the information they need to fulfill their
obligations under the Commission's rules. We seek comment on our
tentative conclusion that the public interest would be served by our
proposal to require electronic delivery of notices mandated by section
76.64(k) and the rules in subpart T listed above. Alternatively, is
there any reason why a cable operator should retain the option to
deliver such notices to broadcast television stations in a non-
electronic format, such as via certified mail?
7. We tentatively conclude that the Commission has authority under
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), to require the
section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices from cable operators to
broadcast stations to be delivered electronically via email. Pursuant
to sections 4 and 303 of the Act, the Commission may exercise broad
authority to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to execute its
functions and carry out the provisions of the Act. In addition, section
614 of the Act provides the Commission with broad authority to issue
regulations, including the notification requirements in section
76.64(k) and subpart T of our rules, implementing the must-carry
requirements prescribed by the Act. While sections 614(b)(9) and
615(g)(3) of the Act require that ``written notice'' be provided before
repositioning or deleting a local television station on the cable
system, we tentatively conclude that electronic delivery of the notices
via email satisfies this ``written notice'' requirement. As the
Commission has found previously, emails, by their very nature, convey
information in writing. We seek comment on these tentative conclusions.
8. To ensure that television stations continue to receive notices
from cable operators as required by section 76.64(k) and subpart T, we
tentatively conclude that after July 31, 2020, a cable operator should
be required to distribute such notices to television stations
electronically via email to an email address designated by the station.
In the Carriage Election Notice Modernization Order and FNPRM, MB
Docket Nos. 17-317 and 17-105, FCC 19-69, the Commission adopted new
rules requiring that all broadcast stations subject to the rules must
maintain in the OPIF an up-to-date email address and phone number for
carriage-related questions by July 31, 2020. Similarly, with respect to
the written notices that cable operators are required to provide to
television stations pursuant to section 76.64(k) and subpart T, we
propose to require that after July 31, 2020, all such notices must be
delivered electronically to the carriage election email address
designated by the station in the OPIF. We tentatively conclude that
requiring the use of a designated email address that the station posts
to the OPIF will help ensure that cable operators are easily able to
identify the correct email address for delivering notices
electronically to commercial and noncommercial full-power and Class A
television stations and that such contact information is current.
Stations are expected to update the OPIF in a timely fashion and to
maintain an orderly OPIF. We seek comment on these tentative
conclusions.
9. In some circumstances, a cable operator may be required to
provide section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices to low power television
(LPTV) stations that are not Class A stations or to certain NCE
translator stations, neither of which are subject to the OPIF rules.
Because these stations would need to use alternative means to publicize
a designated email address for receiving notices electronically, we
seek comment below on how our proposal to require electronic delivery
of notices can be best applied to LPTV stations that are not Class A
stations and to qualified NCE translator stations, to the extent they
are entitled to receive the notices prescribed by section 76.64(k) and
subpart T of our rules. The extent to which an LPTV station is entitled
to receive notices pursuant to section 76.64(k) and subpart T of our
rules depends on whether the station is a ``qualified'' LPTV station as
defined in section 614 of the Act and section 76.55(d) of our rules. A
qualified LPTV station can be either a Class A television station or a
non-Class A LPTV station under section 614 of the Act. To be
``qualified,'' an LPTV station must satisfy certain criteria. Unlike
qualified LPTV stations, non-qualified LPTV stations do not have the
option to elect must-carry status; however, like other broadcast
stations, non-qualified LPTV stations are eligible to negotiate
carriage pursuant to retransmission consent agreements. The Commission
has previously concluded that qualified LPTV stations are entitled to
receive notice from a cable operator at least 30 days before the
operator deletes or repositions the station, in accordance with section
76.1601 of our rules. To the extent that non-qualified LPTV stations
are carried on a cable system pursuant to retransmission consent,
however, such stations are also entitled to receive notices of deletion
or repositioning pursuant to section 76.1601. Similarly, qualified LPTV
stations that elect must-carry are entitled to receive the notices
required by sections 76.64(k), 76.1607,
[[Page 37982]]
and 76.1617(b). In contrast, LPTV stations are not entitled to receive
non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity notices under section
76.1609, because our rules do not entitle these stations to exercise
network non-duplication or syndicated exclusivity protection.
Similarly, LPTV stations are not entitled to receive notices under
sections 76.1608 and 76.1617(c), because these rules require notice
only to ``television broadcast stations'' or ``television stations,''
which, as defined in section 76.5(b) of our rules, excludes LPTV
stations. Finally, with respect to section 76.1617(a), which requires
notices only to ``qualified NCE stations,'' LPTV stations are entitled
to such notices only to the extent they meet the definition of
qualified NCE television station set forth in section 76.55(a) of our
rules.
10. Because Class A stations, like full-power television stations,
are subject to the OPIF rules, including the requirement to provide
carriage election contact information in the OPIF, our proposal would
require the use of the designated carriage election email address for
electronic delivery of section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices to Class
A stations. We seek comment on whether and how our proposal to require
electronic delivery of section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices can be
applied with respect to LPTV stations that are not Class A stations and
to translator stations that meet the definition of a ``qualified NCE
television station'' under section 615(l)(1) of the Act (qualified NCE
translator stations). Unlike full-power and Class A television
stations, non-Class A LPTV stations and qualified NCE translator
stations are not subject to our OPIF rules. Accordingly, LPTV stations
without Class A status and qualified NCE translator stations may need
to use an alternative means to publicize a designated email address for
receiving section 76.64(k) and subpart T notices if the notices are to
be delivered to them electronically after July 31, 2020.\1\ One
potential approach, as discussed in the Carriage Election Notice
Modernization Order and FNPRM, is to require that LPTV stations and
qualified NCE translator stations post any required public-facing
information on the first page of a company website. We seek comment on
this approach and whether we should adopt a rule requiring that on or
before July 31, 2020, LPTV stations and qualified NCE translator
stations that are entitled to receive section 76.64(k) and subpart T
notices must designate an email address for receiving such notices
electronically. This proposed timeframe is consistent with the
timeframe in which commercial and noncommercial full-power television
stations must add their carriage election contact information to the
OPIF. Is it reasonable to expect that all LPTV stations and qualified
NCE translator stations will have an existing public-facing company
website, i.e., one that is easily accessible for free by the general
public, on which they could publicize a designated email address for
receiving the notices required by section 76.64(k) and subpart T? Would
this approach ensure that cable operators are able to easily identify
the designated email address for delivering the required notices to
such stations? Are there other alternatives that would provide similar
access to this information at minimal cost and with minimal burden? For
instance, to the extent that qualified NCE translator stations are co-
owned with the primary station, should we simply require that section
76.64(k) and subpart T notices to these stations be delivered
electronically to the carriage-election email address designated by the
primary station in its OPIF, rather than requiring that such translator
stations post a designated email address on the company website? We
seek comment on these issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this paragraph, our focus is on those LPTV
stations without Class A status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. We seek comment on the specific benefits that would accrue from
our proposals and whether they would pose any burdens on cable
operators and broadcast television stations. Would our proposed
approach reduce the time and money spent on delivering and/or receiving
the required written notices while ensuring that stations continue to
receive them in a timely manner? Are there any circumstances in which a
television station, or subset of television stations such as LPTV
stations or qualified NCE translator stations, should be allowed to opt
out of electronic delivery and continue receiving the notices via
certified mail or in a non-electronic format? Are there other
alternative means of delivering these notices that would better serve
the needs of broadcasters and cable operators but still be less
burdensome? How would such approaches work in practice? We seek comment
on these issues.
12. New section 76.1600 of the Commission's rules was adopted by
the Commission in the Subscriber Notices Order and FNPRM, MB Docket
Nos. 17-317 and 17-105, FCC 18-166, and the rule allows MVPDs to
deliver subscriber privacy notifications and other written information
electronically to subscribers and customers via email so long as the
MVPD complies with certain consumer safeguards. We propose to add to
section 76.1600 a new subsection requiring that the written information
provided by cable operators to broadcast television stations under
section 76.64(k) and subpart T must be delivered to the station
electronically via email to the email address designated by the station
in the OPIF. As discussed above, we seek comment on whether non-Class A
LPTV stations and qualified NCE translator stations should be required
to post an email address on the first page of their websites. To avoid
potential discrepancies with our proposed revision to section 76.1600,
we also propose minor amendments to sections 76.64(k), 76.1607,
76.1609, and 76.1617 of our rules. Currently, sections 76.64(k),
76.1607, and 76.1617 each require that certain written information be
provided to broadcast stations ``by certified mail.'' Similarly,
section 76.1609 currently requires that certain notices be mailed to
television stations or delivered to stations by hand.\2\ We propose to
add language to sections 76.64(k), 76.1607, 76.1609, and 76.1617 to
reflect our proposal that cable operators be required to deliver the
notices electronically to broadcast television stations via email in
accordance with our proposed revision to section 76.1600. Finally, we
also propose to make a minor correction to our rules in part 74 by
moving our existing channel sharing rule for LPTV and TV translator
stations from subpart H (Low Power Auxiliary Stations) to subpart G
(Low Power TV, TV Translator, and TV Booster Stations). Our channel
sharing rule for LPTV and TV translator stations is set forth in
section 74.799. Because the rules in subpart G apply to LPTV stations,
TV translator stations, and TV booster stations, subpart G is a more
appropriate location for section 74.799 than subpart H, which contains
rules for low power auxiliary stations that transmit over distances of
approximately 100 meters for uses such as wireless microphones, cue and
control communications, and synchronization of TV camera signals. We
seek comment on the proposed rule amendments discussed above and any
other rule changes that are necessary to
[[Page 37983]]
implement the proposals discussed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In addition to serving copies of the notice on the relevant
television stations, the cable operator must also file the original
copy of the notice with the Commission within 60 days following the
provision of service to 1,000 subscribers. We are not proposing to
change this aspect of the rule, which, unlike the requirements
discussed above, does not require notices from cable operators to
broadcast stations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Sections 76.54(e) and 76.66 of our rules contain notification
requirements for DBS providers that are similar to the notification
requirements for cable operators discussed above. These written notices
from DBS providers must be delivered to television stations in the
following circumstances: Notifying all televisions stations in a market
prior to retransmitting a significantly viewed station into that market
(section 76.54(e)); notifying local television stations of the
provider's intent to launch new local-into-local service in the local
market (section 76.66(d)(2)(i) through (ii)); notifying local
television stations of the provider's intent to launch HD carry-one,
carry-all in the local market (section 76.66(d)(2)(vi)); informing each
local television station of the provider's intent to fulfil or deny the
station's carriage request and the reasons for declining (section
76.66(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(3)(iv)); identifying each affiliate of
the same television network that the DBS provider reserves the right to
retransmit into a station's local market during the next carriage
election cycle (section 76.66(d)(5)(i)); informing local television
stations of the location of the DBS provider's local receive facility
or its intent to relocate such facility (section 76.66(f)(3) through
(4)); notifying local television stations when deleting a station that
substantially duplicates another or adding a station that no longer
duplicates another (section 76.66(h)(5)). We seek comment on whether
the Commission should also require that DBS providers deliver such
notices to broadcast television stations electronically after July 31,
2020, if the Commission adopts such a requirement for cable operators.
The Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004
added section 338(h)(2) of the Act and directed the Commission to
revise its rules requiring that DBS providers notify local television
stations prior to launching local-into-local service in a market.
Section 338(h)(2)(C) of the Act states that ``[s]uch regulations shall
require that each satellite carrier shall transmit the notices required
by such regulation via certified mail to the address for such
television station licensee listed in the consolidated database system
maintained by the Commission.'' We seek comment on whether the statute
creates an ongoing obligation for the Commission to maintain this
certified mail notice requirement by regulation, or whether, once
having revised our rules to satisfy section 338(h)(2)(A), we have the
ability to change our notification rules pursuant to the standard
notice-and-comment rulemaking process. Does section 338(h)(2) of the
Act currently limit the Commission's authority to require electronic
delivery of the notices that DBS providers must send to local
television stations prior to launching local-into-local service in the
local market? Are all the DBS notice rules subject to the restriction
in section 338(h)(2), or are there some that fall outside that
provision? What are the specific benefits and burdens of electronic
delivery of the notices required by sections 76.54(e) and 76.66 for
both broadcasters and DBS providers? If the Commission decides to
require that certain such notices be delivered via email, how should
the Commission revise sections 76.54(e) and 76.66 to implement such a
requirement? We seek comment on these issues.
14. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), the Commission
has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) concerning the possible significant economic impact on small
entities by the policies and rules proposed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM). Written public comments are requested on this IRFA.
Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the deadlines for comments provided on the first page of the NPRM.
The Commission will send a copy of the NPRM, including this IRFA, to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
(SBA). In summary, the NPRM proposes to revise the Commission's rules
to require that cable operators distribute certain notices required by
section 76.64(k) and subpart T of the Commission's rules to broadcast
television stations electronically via email to the email address
designated by the station as carriage election contact information in
the online public file (OPIF). The NPRM seeks comment on whether and
how the proposal to require electronic delivery of the section 76.64(k)
and subpart T notices can be applied with respect to LPTV stations
without Class A status and to translator stations that meet the
definition of a ``qualified NCE television station'' under section
615(l)(1) of the Communications Act. In addition, the NPRM also seeks
comment on whether to similarly require electronic delivery of certain
notices that direct broadcast satellite (DBS) providers are required to
send to broadcast television stations under sections 76.54(e) and 76.66
of the Commission's rules. The proposed action is authorized pursuant
to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 338, 340, 614, and 615 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i),
154(j), 303(r), 338, 340, 534, and 535. The types of small entities
that may be affected by the proposals contained in the NPRM fall within
the following categories: Cable Companies and Systems (Rate Regulation
Standard); Cable System Operators (Telecommunications Act Standard);
Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) Service; and Television Broadcasting.
The NPRM proposes to revise existing reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance requirements by modernizing certain notification
requirements for cable operators and DBS providers to require the use
of email rather than paper delivery. There is no overlap with other
regulations or laws. The NPRM seeks comment on other alternative means
of delivering the notices that would better serve the needs of
broadcasters and MVPDs, including small entities, but still be less
burdensome than sending the notices by paper delivery.
15. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis. This document may
result in new or revised information collection requirements subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3501
through 3520). If the Commission adopts any new or revised information
collection requirement, the Commission will publish a notice in the
Federal Register inviting the public to comment on the requirement, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3520). In addition, pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4), the Commission seeks specific comment on how it might
``further reduce the information collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.''
16. Ex Parte Rules--Permit-But-Disclose. The proceeding this Notice
initiates shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in
accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 CFR 1.1200 et seq.
Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within
two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex
parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise
participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was
made, and (2)
[[Page 37984]]
summarize all data presented and arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter's
written comments, memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the
presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her
prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant
page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be
found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown
or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be
written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and
must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt,
searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
17. The proposed action is authorized pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
4(j), 303(r), 338, 340, 614, and 615 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 303(r), 338, 340, 534,
and 535.
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 74
Communications equipment, Education, Radio, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research, Television.
47 CFR Part 76
Administrative practice and procedure, Cable television, Equal
employment opportunity, Political candidates, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR parts 74 and 76 as
follows:
PART 74--EXPERIMENTAL RADIO, AUXILIARY, SPECIAL BROADCAST AND OTHER
PROGRAM DISTRIBUTIONAL SERVICES
0
1. The authority for part 74 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, 307, 309, 310, 336, and
554.
0
2. Add Sec. 74.779 to read as follows:
Sec. 74.779 Electronic Delivery of Notices to LPTV stations.
Beginning July 31, 2020, each licensee of a low power television
station or translator station that is entitled to receive notices
pursuant to section 76.64(k), 76.1601, 76.1607, or 76.1617 of this
title shall post publicly on the main page of station's website an
email address for electronic receipt of such notices by the station.
This section does not apply to Class A television stations.
0
3. Transfer Sec. 74.799 from subpart H to subpart G.
PART 76--MULTICHANNEL VIDEO AND CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE
0
4. The authority for part 76 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154, 301, 302, 302a, 303,
303a, 307, 308, 309, 312, 315, 317, 325, 338, 339, 340, 341, 503,
521, 522, 531, 532, 534, 535, 536, 537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 548,
549, 552, 554, 556, 558, 560, 561, 571, 572, 573.
0
5. Amend Sec. 76.54 by revising the last sentence of paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
Sec. 76.54 Significantly viewed signals; method to be followed for
special showings.
* * * * *
(e) * * * Such written notice must be delivered to stations
electronically in accordance with section 76.66(d)(2)(ii) of this
subpart D.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 76.64 by revising the second sentence of paragraph (k)
to read as follows:
Sec. 76.64 Retransmission consent.
* * * * *
(k) * * * The cable operator must send such notification by
electronic delivery, in accordance with Sec. 76.1600, at least 60 days
prior to commencing cable service. * * *
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 76.66 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(iv) introductory text;
0
b. Adding a second sentence to paragraphs (d)(2)(ii), (v), (vi),
(d)(3)(iv), (d)(5)(i), (f)(3);
0
c. Adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (f)(4); and
0
d. Adding a second sentence to paragraph (h)(5).
The additions and revision read as follows:
Sec. 76.66 Satellite broadcast signal carriage.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Within 30 days of receiving a television station's carriage
request, a satellite carrier shall notify in writing electronically in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section:
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * The written notices required by paragraphs (d)(1)(iv),
(d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(5)(i), (f)(3), (f)(4), and
(h)(5) of this section shall be delivered electronically via email to
the email address for carriage-related questions that the station lists
in its public file in accordance with Sec. Sec. 73.3626 and 73.3527 of
part 73 of this title.
* * * * *
(v) * * * The written notices required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this section.
(vi) * * * The written notices required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) * * * The written notices required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this section.
(5) * * *
(i) * * * The written notices required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(3) * * * The written notices required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this section.
(4) * * * The written notices required by this paragraph shall be
delivered to stations electronically in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(5) * * * The required notice to the affected television station
shall be delivered to the station electronically in
[[Page 37985]]
accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 76.1600 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 76.1600 Electronic delivery of notices.
* * * * *
(e) Written information provided by cable operators to broadcast
stations pursuant to Sec. Sec. 76.64(k), 76.1601, 76.1607, 76.1608,
76.1609, and 76.1617 of this Part 76 must be delivered electronically
to a station via email to the email address for carriage-related
questions that the television broadcast station lists in its public
file in accordance with Sec. Sec. 73.3626 and 73.3527 of Part 73 of
this title, or in the case of low power television stations or
translator stations, to the email address that the station posts on its
website in accordance with Sec. 74.779 of Part 74 of this title.
0
9. Revise Sec. 76.1607 to read as follows:
Sec. 76.1607 Principal headend.
A cable operator shall provide written notice by electronic
delivery, in accordance with Sec. 76.1600, to all stations carried on
its system pursuant to the must-carry rules at least 60 days prior to
any change in the designation of its principal headend.
0
10. Revise Sec. 76.1609 to read as follows:
Sec. 76.1609 Non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity.
Within 60 days following the provision of service to 1,000
subscribers, the operator of each such system shall file a notice to
that effect with the Commission, and provide a copy of that notice, by
electronic delivery in accordance with Sec. 76.1600, to every
television station that would be entitled to exercise network non-
duplication protection or syndicated exclusivity protection against the
operator.
0
11. Amend Sec. 76.1617 by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 76.1617 Initial must-carry notice.
(a) Within 60 days of activation of a cable system, a cable
operator must notify all qualified NCE stations of its designated
principal headend by electronic delivery in accordance with Sec.
76.1600.
* * * * *
(c) Within 60 days of activation of a cable system, a cable
operator must send, by electronic delivery in accordance with Sec.
76.1600, a copy of a list of all broadcast television stations carried
by its system and their channel positions to all local commercial and
noncommercial television stations, including those not designated as
must-carry stations and those not carried on the system.
[FR Doc. 2019-16338 Filed 8-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P