Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Title V Operation Permit Program, 37104-37107 [2019-16336]
Download as PDF
37104
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4), or require prior
consultation with state officials as
specified by Executive Order 12875 (58
FR 58093, October 28, 1993), or involve
special consideration of environmental
justice related issues as required by
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
Because this action is not subject to
notice-and-comment requirements
under the APA or any other statute, it
is not subject to the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as
added by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, the
EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to
the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Comptroller
General of the General Accounting
Office prior to publication of this rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 16, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c)(459)
introductory text and (c)(459)(ii)(A)(1)
to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
*
*
Identification of plan—in part.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
19:26 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
(c) * * *
(459) The following plan revision was
submitted on October 27, 2009, by the
Governor’s designee.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) Reasonably Available Control
Technology State Implementation Plan
Revision, Negative Declaration for
Control Techniques Guidelines Issued
2006–2008 (‘‘2009 RACT SIP’’), as
adopted on June 1, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–16050 Filed 7–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0285; FRL–9997–36–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Title V
Operation Permit Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving updates and
revisions to the Wisconsin title V
Operation Permit Program, submitted by
Wisconsin pursuant to subchapter V of
the Clean Air Act (Act), which requires
states to develop, and to submit to EPA
for approval, programs for issuing
operation permits to all major stationary
sources. The revision was submitted to
update the title V program since the
final approval of the program in 2001
and to change the permit fee schedule
for subject facilities. The revision
consists of amendments to Chapter
Natural Resources (NR) 407 Wisconsin
Administrative Code, operation permits,
Chapter NR 410 Wisconsin
Administrative Code, permit fees, and
Wisconsin statute 285.69, fee structure.
This approval action will help ensure
that Wisconsin properly implements the
requirements of title V of the Act.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective September 30, 2019, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
August 30, 2019. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2018–0285 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
damico.genevieve@epa.gov. For
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Kraj, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–2654, kraj.susan@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What did Wisconsin Submit?
II. What is EPA Approving?
III. What Action is EPA Taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews.
I. What did Wisconsin submit?
A. Background
On March 8, 2017, EPA received a
request from the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources (WDNR) that we
approve revisions and updates to
Wisconsin’s title V operating permit
program. Pursuant to subchapter V of
the Act, generally known as title V, and
the implementing regulations, at 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
70, states developed and submitted to
EPA for approval programs for issuing
operation permits to all major stationary
sources and to certain other sources.
EPA promulgated interim approval of
Wisconsin’s title V operating permit
program on March 6, 1995 (60 FR
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
12128). In 2001, Wisconsin submitted
corrections to the interim approval
issues identified in the 1995 interim
approval action as well as additional
program revisions and updates. EPA
took action to approve the corrections to
the interim approval issues and
promulgated final approval of the
Wisconsin title V program on December
4, 2001 (66 FR 62951).
B. Wisconsin’s Submittal
Wisconsin is seeking approval of
changes and updates made to its title V
program since the 1995 and 2001
approvals. EPA received WDNR’s
submittal updating its title V operating
permit program on March 8, 2017, and
supplemental information on January
26, 2018 (submittal). WDNR’s submittal
contains two sections, Part 1 and Part 2.
Part 1 contains previously approved
program elements which are included
for informational purposes, as well as
Other Changes — Minor Clarifications
and Corrections (which are changes that
were included in WDNR’s 2001
submittal that EPA did not act on or
approve in the 2001 approval).
Part 2 contains title V program
revisions and updates since Wisconsin’s
program was approved in 2001. Part 2
of the submittal contains section I—
Additional State Rule Changes and
Updates to the Regulations, and section
II—Permit Fee Demonstration.
II. What is EPA approving?
In this action, EPA is addressing the
changes and updates in WDNR’s
submittal that have not been previously
approved. This includes the Part 1,
Section IX Other Changes — Minor
Clarifications and Corrections, as well
as the changes in Part 2, Sections I and
II, of WDNR’s submittal that relate to the
Federal title V program at 40 CFR part
70.
WDNR’s submittal includes changes
related to several different operating
permit programs, including its title V
program as well its Federally
Enforceable State Operating Permit
(FESOP) program and its state-only
enforceable operating permit program.
EPA approved Wisconsin’s FESOP
program on January 18, 1995 (60 FR
3538). FESOP permits are those in
which a source takes a federallyenforceable limit to restrict its emissions
to below major source thresholds in
order to avoid needing a title V permit.
WDNR’s State-only operating permit
program is for sources with emissions
below those that would require a FESOP
or title V permit. In this action, EPA is
only approving provisions related to
WDNR’s title V operating permit
program. EPA is not approving any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:26 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
changes or updates solely related to
WDNR’s FESOP or State-only operation
permit programs.
For the reasons set forth below, the
revisions and updates to WDNR’s title V
operating permits program, including
the submitted amendments to the
operating permits program regulations
at NR 407 Wisconsin Administrative
Code and fee related provisions at NR
410 and Wisconsin Statute 285.69,
substantially meet the corresponding
requirements of 40 CFR part 70.
A. Analysis of Part I Section IX—Minor
Clarifications and Corrections
In Wisconsin’s 1995 initial program
approval, EPA identified several issues
(in addition to the interim approval
issues) that should be clarified or
corrected, and WDNR agreed to make
these changes. WDNR included these
changes in its 2001 program submittal,
but EPA only acted on the interim
approval corrections at that time. For
each of these additional items EPA had
identified, WDNR included an analysis
of the changes in its current submittal.
EPA is approving the changes identified
in Part I, Section IX, items 1–6 of the
submittal.
B. Analysis of Part 2, Section I—
Updates to Regulations
WDNR’s submittal contains over
thirty revisions related to its operation
permit program since the final approval
in 2001. The WDNR followed all
necessary procedures for adoption of
changes that were made to these
regulations including the WDNR’s
secretary’s approval of the notice of
public hearing, certification of
publication, affidavit of mailing of the
public notice to interested parties, a list
of public hearing appearances, and the
WDNR report on comments and
response to comments.
For a detailed analysis of Part 2,
Section I—Updates to Regulations, of
the submittal, please refer to the
Technical Support Document (TSD) for
this action, which is available in the
docket at the address noted above. The
TSD shows that all operating permit
program requirements of title V of the
Act, 40 CFR part 70, and relevant
guidance were met by Wisconsin’s
submittal.
C. Analysis of Part 2, Section II—Permit
Fee Demonstration
WDNR submitted a fee demonstration
because it is required by 42 U.S.C.
7661a(b)(3) and 40 CFR 70.9(a), which
provide that a state program must
require that the owners or operators of
part 70 sources pay annual fees, or the
equivalent over some other period, that
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37105
are sufficient to cover the permit
program costs. 42 U.S.C. 7661a(b)(3) and
40 CFR 70.9(b) provide that a state may
collect fees that cover the actual permit
program costs, or may use a
presumptive fee schedule, adjusted for
inflation (using the Consumer Price
Index). Wisconsin’s fee schedule is not
based on the presumptive minimum fee
schedule established in 40 CFR 70.9(b)
and does not provide for inflation
adjustments; therefore, Wisconsin must
provide a demonstration that its
collected fees cover the actual permit
program costs as required by 40 CFR
70.9(b)(5).
WDNR describes in its submittal the
rule changes related to fees that have
occurred since 2001, including changes
that revised the operation permit fee
structure. WDNR’s current title V fee
structure requires sources that are
required to obtain a Federal operation
permit to pay an annual air emissions
tonnage fee, but sources also pay an
additional annual flat fee, based on the
tons of actual billable emissions. In
addition, sources also pay an additional
annual flat fee if the source is subject to
other requirements, such as if maximum
achievable control technology standards
apply to the source, if one or more
Federal new source performance
standards apply to the source, if Federal
prevention of significant deterioration
permitting applies to the source, and if
the source is a privately-owned coalfired electric utility with an electric
generating unit, among other flat fees.
The submittal provides tables
showing the fee rate per ton of billable
pollutants, the billable tons, and the
total fees assessed for various years. The
submittal also provides details on
WDNR’s revenue, work planning, and
expenditures. In addition, WDNR has
several mechanisms in place to ensure
that fees collected from title V sources
are used solely for funding title V
permit activities as required by 40 CFR
70.9(a). In the submittal, WDNR
compares the actual revenues collected
under its fee structure to an estimate of
what would be collected using the
presumptive minimum fee schedule,
and WDNR’s actual revenues collected
exceed the presumptive minimum
projections. WDNR demonstrates that
the level of fees collected by WDNR
from federally-regulated sources is
sufficient for the WDNR to adequately
administer and enforce the required
minimum elements of the title V permit
program required in Section 502(b) of
the Act.
Upon review of the information
submitted, EPA finds that WDNR has
demonstrated that it has adequate
funding levels to support its title V
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
37106
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
program. Accordingly, Wisconsin has
adequately demonstrated that the
revised fee schedule has resulted in the
collection of fees in an amount
sufficient to cover its actual program
costs, as required by 40 CFR 70.9 and
the Act.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving Wisconsin’s
submittal. This approval of the revisions
and updates in Wisconsin’s submittal
addresses only the provisions as
described above in Section II, What is
EPA Approving, which pertain to the
Federal title V program requirements,
and does not apply to any other Federal
program requirements, such as State
Implementation Plans pursuant to
section 110 of the Act. EPA finds that
the program revisions and updates in
WDNR’s submittal have satisfactorily
addressed the requirements of part 70,
and EPA is therefore approving this
submittal.
We are publishing this action without
prior proposal because we view this as
a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this issue of the Federal Register, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
State plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective September 30, 2019 without
further notice unless we receive relevant
adverse written comments by August
30, 2019. If we receive such comments,
we will withdraw this action before the
effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. If we do not receive any
comments, this action will be effective
September 30, 2019.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563:
Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this action
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
19:26 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
action is not significant under Executive
Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this state
operating permit program will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this action proposes to
approve pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action also does not have
federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a state operating
permit program, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Act.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
VerDate Sep<11>2014
and, therefore, is not subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
In addition, the state operating permit
program is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
country, the state operating permit
program does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it proposes to
approve a state operating permit
program.
Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy
action,’’ this action is also not subject to
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001).
National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
In reviewing state submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Act. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
state to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a state submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a
state submission that otherwise satisfies
the provisions of the Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply.
Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629
(Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA lacks the discretionary authority
to address environmental justice in this
action. In reviewing state operating
permit program submissions, EPA’s role
is to approve or disapprove state
choices, based on the criteria of the Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves certain state requirements and
will not in-and-of itself create any new
requirements. Accordingly, it does not
provide EPA with the discretionary
authority to address, as appropriate,
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable
and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Operation permits, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 17, 2019.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 70 is amended as follows:
PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. Amend appendix A to part 70 by
adding paragraph (d) under Wisconsin
to read as follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Wisconsin
*
*
(d) Department of Natural Resources: Title
v operating permit program revisions and
updates received on March 8, 2017.
Wisconsin’s Title v program is hereby
updated to include these requested changes.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–16336 Filed 7–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:26 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002; FRL–9997–
52–Region 5]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion
of the Duell & Gardner Landfill
Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 5 is publishing a
direct final Notice of Deletion of the
Duell & Gardner Landfill Superfund Site
(Duell & Gardner Site), located in Dalton
Township, Muskegon County,
Michigan, from the National Priorities
List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated
pursuant to Section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct
final deletion is being published by EPA
with the concurrence of the State of
Michigan, through the Michigan
Department of Environment, Great
Lakes and Energy (MDEGLE) because
EPA has determined that all appropriate
response actions under CERCLA, other
than operation and maintenance,
monitoring and five-year reviews, have
been completed. However, this deletion
does not preclude future actions under
Superfund.
DATES: This direct final deletion is
effective September 30, 2019 unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
August 30, 2019. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register informing the
public that the deletion will not take
effect.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1983–0002, by one of the
following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37107
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
Email: cano.randolph@epa.gov.
Mail: Randolph Cano, NPL Deletion
Coordinator, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 5 (SR–6J), 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL
60604, (312) 886–6036.
Hand deliver: Superfund Records
Center, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, 7th Floor South, Chicago, IL
60604, (312) 886–0900. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
normal business hours are Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–
0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 31, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37104-37107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16336]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0285; FRL-9997-36-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Title V Operation Permit Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving updates
and revisions to the Wisconsin title V Operation Permit Program,
submitted by Wisconsin pursuant to subchapter V of the Clean Air Act
(Act), which requires states to develop, and to submit to EPA for
approval, programs for issuing operation permits to all major
stationary sources. The revision was submitted to update the title V
program since the final approval of the program in 2001 and to change
the permit fee schedule for subject facilities. The revision consists
of amendments to Chapter Natural Resources (NR) 407 Wisconsin
Administrative Code, operation permits, Chapter NR 410 Wisconsin
Administrative Code, permit fees, and Wisconsin statute 285.69, fee
structure. This approval action will help ensure that Wisconsin
properly implements the requirements of title V of the Act.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective September 30, 2019,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 30, 2019. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2018-0285 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Kraj, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-2654, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What did Wisconsin Submit?
II. What is EPA Approving?
III. What Action is EPA Taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. What did Wisconsin submit?
A. Background
On March 8, 2017, EPA received a request from the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) that we approve revisions and
updates to Wisconsin's title V operating permit program. Pursuant to
subchapter V of the Act, generally known as title V, and the
implementing regulations, at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
70, states developed and submitted to EPA for approval programs for
issuing operation permits to all major stationary sources and to
certain other sources. EPA promulgated interim approval of Wisconsin's
title V operating permit program on March 6, 1995 (60 FR
[[Page 37105]]
12128). In 2001, Wisconsin submitted corrections to the interim
approval issues identified in the 1995 interim approval action as well
as additional program revisions and updates. EPA took action to approve
the corrections to the interim approval issues and promulgated final
approval of the Wisconsin title V program on December 4, 2001 (66 FR
62951).
B. Wisconsin's Submittal
Wisconsin is seeking approval of changes and updates made to its
title V program since the 1995 and 2001 approvals. EPA received WDNR's
submittal updating its title V operating permit program on March 8,
2017, and supplemental information on January 26, 2018 (submittal).
WDNR's submittal contains two sections, Part 1 and Part 2.
Part 1 contains previously approved program elements which are
included for informational purposes, as well as Other Changes -- Minor
Clarifications and Corrections (which are changes that were included in
WDNR's 2001 submittal that EPA did not act on or approve in the 2001
approval).
Part 2 contains title V program revisions and updates since
Wisconsin's program was approved in 2001. Part 2 of the submittal
contains section I--Additional State Rule Changes and Updates to the
Regulations, and section II--Permit Fee Demonstration.
II. What is EPA approving?
In this action, EPA is addressing the changes and updates in WDNR's
submittal that have not been previously approved. This includes the
Part 1, Section IX Other Changes -- Minor Clarifications and
Corrections, as well as the changes in Part 2, Sections I and II, of
WDNR's submittal that relate to the Federal title V program at 40 CFR
part 70.
WDNR's submittal includes changes related to several different
operating permit programs, including its title V program as well its
Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit (FESOP) program and its
state-only enforceable operating permit program. EPA approved
Wisconsin's FESOP program on January 18, 1995 (60 FR 3538). FESOP
permits are those in which a source takes a federally-enforceable limit
to restrict its emissions to below major source thresholds in order to
avoid needing a title V permit. WDNR's State-only operating permit
program is for sources with emissions below those that would require a
FESOP or title V permit. In this action, EPA is only approving
provisions related to WDNR's title V operating permit program. EPA is
not approving any changes or updates solely related to WDNR's FESOP or
State-only operation permit programs.
For the reasons set forth below, the revisions and updates to
WDNR's title V operating permits program, including the submitted
amendments to the operating permits program regulations at NR 407
Wisconsin Administrative Code and fee related provisions at NR 410 and
Wisconsin Statute 285.69, substantially meet the corresponding
requirements of 40 CFR part 70.
A. Analysis of Part I Section IX--Minor Clarifications and Corrections
In Wisconsin's 1995 initial program approval, EPA identified
several issues (in addition to the interim approval issues) that should
be clarified or corrected, and WDNR agreed to make these changes. WDNR
included these changes in its 2001 program submittal, but EPA only
acted on the interim approval corrections at that time. For each of
these additional items EPA had identified, WDNR included an analysis of
the changes in its current submittal. EPA is approving the changes
identified in Part I, Section IX, items 1-6 of the submittal.
B. Analysis of Part 2, Section I--Updates to Regulations
WDNR's submittal contains over thirty revisions related to its
operation permit program since the final approval in 2001. The WDNR
followed all necessary procedures for adoption of changes that were
made to these regulations including the WDNR's secretary's approval of
the notice of public hearing, certification of publication, affidavit
of mailing of the public notice to interested parties, a list of public
hearing appearances, and the WDNR report on comments and response to
comments.
For a detailed analysis of Part 2, Section I--Updates to
Regulations, of the submittal, please refer to the Technical Support
Document (TSD) for this action, which is available in the docket at the
address noted above. The TSD shows that all operating permit program
requirements of title V of the Act, 40 CFR part 70, and relevant
guidance were met by Wisconsin's submittal.
C. Analysis of Part 2, Section II--Permit Fee Demonstration
WDNR submitted a fee demonstration because it is required by 42
U.S.C. 7661a(b)(3) and 40 CFR 70.9(a), which provide that a state
program must require that the owners or operators of part 70 sources
pay annual fees, or the equivalent over some other period, that are
sufficient to cover the permit program costs. 42 U.S.C. 7661a(b)(3) and
40 CFR 70.9(b) provide that a state may collect fees that cover the
actual permit program costs, or may use a presumptive fee schedule,
adjusted for inflation (using the Consumer Price Index). Wisconsin's
fee schedule is not based on the presumptive minimum fee schedule
established in 40 CFR 70.9(b) and does not provide for inflation
adjustments; therefore, Wisconsin must provide a demonstration that its
collected fees cover the actual permit program costs as required by 40
CFR 70.9(b)(5).
WDNR describes in its submittal the rule changes related to fees
that have occurred since 2001, including changes that revised the
operation permit fee structure. WDNR's current title V fee structure
requires sources that are required to obtain a Federal operation permit
to pay an annual air emissions tonnage fee, but sources also pay an
additional annual flat fee, based on the tons of actual billable
emissions. In addition, sources also pay an additional annual flat fee
if the source is subject to other requirements, such as if maximum
achievable control technology standards apply to the source, if one or
more Federal new source performance standards apply to the source, if
Federal prevention of significant deterioration permitting applies to
the source, and if the source is a privately-owned coal-fired electric
utility with an electric generating unit, among other flat fees.
The submittal provides tables showing the fee rate per ton of
billable pollutants, the billable tons, and the total fees assessed for
various years. The submittal also provides details on WDNR's revenue,
work planning, and expenditures. In addition, WDNR has several
mechanisms in place to ensure that fees collected from title V sources
are used solely for funding title V permit activities as required by 40
CFR 70.9(a). In the submittal, WDNR compares the actual revenues
collected under its fee structure to an estimate of what would be
collected using the presumptive minimum fee schedule, and WDNR's actual
revenues collected exceed the presumptive minimum projections. WDNR
demonstrates that the level of fees collected by WDNR from federally-
regulated sources is sufficient for the WDNR to adequately administer
and enforce the required minimum elements of the title V permit program
required in Section 502(b) of the Act.
Upon review of the information submitted, EPA finds that WDNR has
demonstrated that it has adequate funding levels to support its title V
[[Page 37106]]
program. Accordingly, Wisconsin has adequately demonstrated that the
revised fee schedule has resulted in the collection of fees in an
amount sufficient to cover its actual program costs, as required by 40
CFR 70.9 and the Act.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving Wisconsin's submittal. This approval of the
revisions and updates in Wisconsin's submittal addresses only the
provisions as described above in Section II, What is EPA Approving,
which pertain to the Federal title V program requirements, and does not
apply to any other Federal program requirements, such as State
Implementation Plans pursuant to section 110 of the Act. EPA finds that
the program revisions and updates in WDNR's submittal have
satisfactorily addressed the requirements of part 70, and EPA is
therefore approving this submittal.
We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this issue of the
Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve
as the proposal to approve the State plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be effective September 30, 2019
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by August 30, 2019. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
If we do not receive any comments, this action will be effective
September 30, 2019.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563: Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this action is not a
``significant regulatory action'' and, therefore, is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this state operating permit program will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this action proposes to approve pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action also does not have federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely proposes to approve a state operating
permit program, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution
of power and responsibilities established in the Act.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In addition, the state operating permit program is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In
those areas of Indian country, the state operating permit program does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it proposes to approve a
state operating permit program.
Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
In reviewing state submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the state
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a state submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a state submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
[[Page 37107]]
populations and low-income populations in the United States.
EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental
justice in this action. In reviewing state operating permit program
submissions, EPA's role is to approve or disapprove state choices,
based on the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves certain state requirements and will not in-and-of itself
create any new requirements. Accordingly, it does not provide EPA with
the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate,
disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order
12898.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operation permits,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 17, 2019.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 70 is amended as follows:
PART 70--STATE OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
0
2. Amend appendix A to part 70 by adding paragraph (d) under Wisconsin
to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
* * * * *
Wisconsin
* * * * *
(d) Department of Natural Resources: Title v operating permit
program revisions and updates received on March 8, 2017. Wisconsin's
Title v program is hereby updated to include these requested
changes.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-16336 Filed 7-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P