Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes, 37165-37167 [2019-16130]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
recommended. Those procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance
with the operator’s maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(l) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2019–
0031, contact the EASA, Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 89990 6017; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; Internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this EASA
AD at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
EASA AD 2019–0031 may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0580.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3229.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July
23, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–16132 Filed 7–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0581; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–067–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model
382, 382B, 382E, 382F, 382G, C–130A,
C–130B, C–130BL, C130E, C–130H, C
130H 30, C130J, C130J–30, EC130Q,
HC130H, KC 130H, NC–130B, NC130,
and WC–130H airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a report indicating
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:41 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
that two elevator booster assemblies
experienced significant hydraulic fluid
leaks, caused by fatigue cracks in the
actuator cylinder. This proposed AD
would require an inspection to
determine the part number of the
elevator booster actuator, repetitive
ultrasonic inspections of the actuator to
detect cracking, and replacement of
cracked elevator booster assemblies. The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by September 16,
2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company, Customer
Support Center, Dept. 3E1M, Zone 0591,
86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA 30063;
telephone 770–494–9131; email
hercules.support@lmco.com; internet
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/
who-we-are/business-areas/aeronautics/
mmro/customer-support-center.html.
You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195.
37165
Atlanta ACO Branch, 1701 Columbia
Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone:
404–474–5587; fax: 404–474–5606;
email: hector.hernandez@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2019–0581; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–067–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The FAA
specifically invites comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this NPRM. The FAA will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend this NPRM because of
those comments.
The FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Examining the AD Docket
Discussion
The FAA has received a report
indicating that two elevator booster
assemblies experienced significant
hydraulic fluid leaks, caused by fatigue
cracks in the actuator cylinder.
Laboratory analysis of the cracked
elevator booster actuators revealed an
internal area in the cylinder body that
is prone to fatigue crack initiation. The
fatigue crack propagates unseen within
the cylinder under normal operational
loading until either a minor fluid leak
becomes evident or the cylinder
ruptures, creating a major leak. This
condition, if not addressed, could result
in a dual failure of the left and right
actuator cylinders in the elevator
booster assembly, which could lead to a
significant reduction in controllability
of the airplane.
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0581; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is
listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hector Hernandez, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Section, FAA,
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin
382–27–51, Revision 1, dated January
17, 2018; and Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin
82–833, Revision 1, dated January 17,
2018. This service information describes
procedures for an inspection to
determine the part number of the
elevator booster actuator, repetitive
ultrasonic inspections of the elevator
booster actuator at the forward-most end
to detect cracking along the fluid
transfer bore, left and right cylinders,
and replacement of cracked elevator
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
37166
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
booster assemblies. These documents
are distinct since they apply to different
airplane models.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD
because the agency evaluated all the
relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type
design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between this Proposed AD
and the Service Information.’’
Impact on Intrastate Aviation in Alaska
In light of the heavy reliance on
aviation for intrastate transportation in
Alaska, the FAA fully considered the
effects of this proposed AD (including
costs to be borne by affected operators)
from the earliest possible stages of AD
development. This proposed AD is
based on those considerations, and was
developed with regard to minimizing
the economic impact on operators to the
extent possible, consistent with the
safety objectives of this proposed AD. In
any event, the Federal Aviation
Regulations require operators to correct
an unsafe condition identified on an
airplane to ensure operation of that
airplane in an airworthy condition. The
FAA has determined in this case that
the proposed requirements are
necessary and the indirect costs would
be outweighed by the safety benefits of
the proposed AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the Service Information
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Service Bulletin 382–27–51,
Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; and
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 82–833, Revision 1,
dated January 17, 2018; specify to return
parts to the manufacturer. This
proposed AD would not include that
requirement.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 7 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs
to comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Part number inspection .....
Ultrasonic inspections .......
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ........
5 work-hours × $85 per hour = $425
per inspection cycle.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the
Parts cost
$0
0
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
$85 ....................................
425 per inspection cycle ...
$595.
2,975 per inspection cycle.
results of the proposed inspections. The
FAA has no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Replacement ...............................................
10 work-hours × $85 per hour = $850 ..........................................
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:41 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
Parts cost
$43,000
Cost per product
$43,850
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes and associated
appliances to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Regulatory Findings
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Proposed Rules
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company: Docket
No. FAA–2019–0581; Product Identifier
2019–NM–067–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by
September 16, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F,
382G, C–130A, C–130B, C–130BL, C130E, C–
130H, C 130H 30, C130J, C130J–30, EC130Q,
HC130H, KC 130H, NC–130B, NC130, and
WC–130H airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27, Flight controls.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report
indicating that two elevator booster
assemblies experienced significant hydraulic
fluid leaks, caused by fatigue cracks in the
actuator cylinder. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the possibility of a dual failure of
the left and right actuator cylinders in the
elevator booster assembly, which could lead
to a significant reduction in controllability of
the airplane.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Part Number Inspection, Repetitive
Ultrasonic Inspections, and Replacement
(1) On any elevator booster assembly
having a part number 374461–5, 374461–7,
or 374461–11, before the accumulation of
4,000 total flight hours on the elevator
booster assembly, or within 180 days after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, except as required by paragraph
(h) of this AD: Do an inspection of the
elevator booster assembly to determine the
part number of the elevator booster actuator.
If the elevator booster actuator has a part
number other than 5C5803, no further action
is required by this AD.
(2) If, during the inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, any elevator
booster actuator having part number 5C5803
is found, before the accumulation of 4,000
total flight hours on the elevator booster
assembly, or within 180 days after the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:41 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, except as required by paragraph (h) of
this AD: Do an ultrasonic inspection of the
elevator booster actuator at the forward-most
end to detect cracking along the fluid transfer
bore, left and right cylinders, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 382–27–51, Revision 1,
dated January 17, 2018; or Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 82–
833, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; as
applicable. Repeat the inspection thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 1,400 flight hours.
(3) If, during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, any cracking is
found, before further flight: Replace the
elevator booster assembly, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 382–27–51, Revision 1,
dated January 17, 2018; or Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 82–
833, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; as
applicable.
(h) Compliance Time Exception
For any elevator booster assembly having
part number 374461–5, 374461–7, or
374461–11 on which the total flight cycles
are unknown, do the inspections required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, within 180 days after the effective
date of this AD.
(i) No Reporting and No Return of Parts
(1) Although Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Service Bulletin 382–27–51,
Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; and
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 82–833, Revision 1, dated
January 17, 2018; specify to report submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include that requirement.
(2) Although Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Service Bulletin 382–27–51,
Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; and
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 82–833, Revision 1, dated
January 17, 2018; specify to return parts to
the manufacturer, this AD does not require
the return of the parts to the manufacturer.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Service
Bulletin 382–27–51, dated July 17, 2017; or
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 82–833, dated April 28,
2017; as applicable.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37167
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by a Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Designated Engineering
Representative (DER) that has been
authorized by the Manager, Atlanta ACO
Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair, modification deviation,
or alteration deviation must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Hector Hernandez, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section,
FAA, Atlanta ACO Branch, 1701 Columbia
Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone:
404–474–5587; fax: 404–474–5606; email:
hector.hernandez@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company, Customer Support Center, Dept.
3E1M, Zone 0591, 86 S Cobb Drive, Marietta,
GA 30063; telephone 770–494–9131; email
hercules.support@lmco.com; internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/who-we-are/
business-areas/aeronautics/mmro/customersupport-center.html. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July
24, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–16130 Filed 7–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0290; FRL–9997–69–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT)
Determinations for Case-by-Case
Sources Under the 1997 and 2008 8Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards; Part 1
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 31, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37165-37167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16130]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0581; Product Identifier 2019-NM-067-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, 382G, C-130A, C-130B, C-130BL, C130E, C-
130H, C 130H 30, C130J, C130J-30, EC130Q, HC130H, KC 130H, NC-130B,
NC130, and WC-130H airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report
indicating that two elevator booster assemblies experienced significant
hydraulic fluid leaks, caused by fatigue cracks in the actuator
cylinder. This proposed AD would require an inspection to determine the
part number of the elevator booster actuator, repetitive ultrasonic
inspections of the actuator to detect cracking, and replacement of
cracked elevator booster assemblies. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by September
16, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Customer
Support Center, Dept. 3E1M, Zone 0591, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA
30063; telephone 770-494-9131; email [email protected];
internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/who-we-are/business-areas/aeronautics/mmro/customer-support-center.html. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0581; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hector Hernandez, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Atlanta ACO Branch, 1701 Columbia
Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474-5587; fax: 404-474-5606;
email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0581;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-067-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Discussion
The FAA has received a report indicating that two elevator booster
assemblies experienced significant hydraulic fluid leaks, caused by
fatigue cracks in the actuator cylinder. Laboratory analysis of the
cracked elevator booster actuators revealed an internal area in the
cylinder body that is prone to fatigue crack initiation. The fatigue
crack propagates unseen within the cylinder under normal operational
loading until either a minor fluid leak becomes evident or the cylinder
ruptures, creating a major leak. This condition, if not addressed,
could result in a dual failure of the left and right actuator cylinders
in the elevator booster assembly, which could lead to a significant
reduction in controllability of the airplane.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service
Bulletin 382-27-51, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; and Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 82-833, Revision 1, dated
January 17, 2018. This service information describes procedures for an
inspection to determine the part number of the elevator booster
actuator, repetitive ultrasonic inspections of the elevator booster
actuator at the forward-most end to detect cracking along the fluid
transfer bore, left and right cylinders, and replacement of cracked
elevator
[[Page 37166]]
booster assemblies. These documents are distinct since they apply to
different airplane models.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD because the agency evaluated all the
relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service
Information.''
Impact on Intrastate Aviation in Alaska
In light of the heavy reliance on aviation for intrastate
transportation in Alaska, the FAA fully considered the effects of this
proposed AD (including costs to be borne by affected operators) from
the earliest possible stages of AD development. This proposed AD is
based on those considerations, and was developed with regard to
minimizing the economic impact on operators to the extent possible,
consistent with the safety objectives of this proposed AD. In any
event, the Federal Aviation Regulations require operators to correct an
unsafe condition identified on an airplane to ensure operation of that
airplane in an airworthy condition. The FAA has determined in this case
that the proposed requirements are necessary and the indirect costs
would be outweighed by the safety benefits of the proposed AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-27-51,
Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; and Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Service Bulletin 82-833, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018;
specify to return parts to the manufacturer. This proposed AD would not
include that requirement.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 7 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this
proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part number inspection........... 1 work-hour x $85 $0 $85................ $595.
per hour = $85.
Ultrasonic inspections........... 5 work-hours x $85 0 425 per inspection 2,975 per
per hour = $425 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspections. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these replacements:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement................................... 10 work-hours x $85 per hour = $43,000 $43,850
$850.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 37167]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company:
Docket No. FAA-2019-0581; Product Identifier 2019-NM-067-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by September 16, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, 382G, C-
130A, C-130B, C-130BL, C130E, C-130H, C 130H 30, C130J, C130J-30,
EC130Q, HC130H, KC 130H, NC-130B, NC130, and WC-130H airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report indicating that two elevator
booster assemblies experienced significant hydraulic fluid leaks,
caused by fatigue cracks in the actuator cylinder. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the possibility of a dual failure of the
left and right actuator cylinders in the elevator booster assembly,
which could lead to a significant reduction in controllability of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Part Number Inspection, Repetitive Ultrasonic Inspections, and
Replacement
(1) On any elevator booster assembly having a part number
374461-5, 374461-7, or 374461-11, before the accumulation of 4,000
total flight hours on the elevator booster assembly, or within 180
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: Do an inspection of
the elevator booster assembly to determine the part number of the
elevator booster actuator. If the elevator booster actuator has a
part number other than 5C5803, no further action is required by this
AD.
(2) If, during the inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD, any elevator booster actuator having part number 5C5803 is
found, before the accumulation of 4,000 total flight hours on the
elevator booster assembly, or within 180 days after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, except as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD: Do an ultrasonic inspection of the
elevator booster actuator at the forward-most end to detect cracking
along the fluid transfer bore, left and right cylinders, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-27-51, Revision 1, dated
January 17, 2018; or Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service
Bulletin 82-833, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; as applicable.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,400
flight hours.
(3) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of
this AD, any cracking is found, before further flight: Replace the
elevator booster assembly, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin
382-27-51, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; or Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 82-833, Revision 1, dated
January 17, 2018; as applicable.
(h) Compliance Time Exception
For any elevator booster assembly having part number 374461-5,
374461-7, or 374461-11 on which the total flight cycles are unknown,
do the inspections required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this
AD, as applicable, within 180 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(i) No Reporting and No Return of Parts
(1) Although Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service
Bulletin 382-27-51, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; and Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 82-833, Revision 1,
dated January 17, 2018; specify to report submit certain information
to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.
(2) Although Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service
Bulletin 382-27-51, Revision 1, dated January 17, 2018; and Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 82-833, Revision 1,
dated January 17, 2018; specify to return parts to the manufacturer,
this AD does not require the return of the parts to the
manufacturer.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 382-27-51, dated July 17, 2017; or Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 82-833, dated April 28, 2017;
as applicable.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by a Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Designated Engineering Representative (DER) that
has been authorized by the Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair, modification deviation,
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Hector
Hernandez, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA,
Atlanta ACO Branch, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337;
phone: 404-474-5587; fax: 404-474-5606; email:
[email protected].
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company,
Customer Support Center, Dept. 3E1M, Zone 0591, 86 S Cobb Drive,
Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770-494-9131; email
[email protected]; internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/who-we-are/business-areas/aeronautics/mmro/customer-support-center.html. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206-231-3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July 24, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-16130 Filed 7-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P