Streamlining the Registration Process for Private Voluntary Organizations, 37079-37081 [2019-15685]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
misleading certificate is provided, under
49 U.S.C. 32504.
(2) The maximum civil penalty under
this paragraph (c) for a related series of
violations is $3,256,233.
(d) Consumer information—(1) Crashworthiness and damage susceptibility. A
person who violates 49 U.S.C. 32308(a),
regarding crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility, is liable to the United
States Government for a civil penalty of
not more than $2,924 for each violation.
Each failure to provide information or
comply with a regulation in violation of
49 U.S.C. 32308(a) is a separate
violation. The maximum penalty under
this paragraph for a related series of
violations is $1,594,890.
(2) Consumer tire information. Any
person who fails to comply with the
national tire fuel efficiency program
under 49 U.S.C. 32304A is liable to the
United States Government for a civil
penalty of not more than $60,518 for
each violation.
(e) Country of origin content labeling.
A manufacturer of a passenger motor
vehicle distributed in commerce for sale
in the United States that willfully fails
to attach the label required under 49
U.S.C. 32304 to a new passenger motor
vehicle that the manufacturer
manufactures or imports, or a dealer
that fails to maintain that label as
required under 49 U.S.C. 32304, is liable
to the United States Government for a
civil penalty of not more than $1,783 for
each violation. Each failure to attach or
maintain that label for each vehicle is a
separate violation.
(f) Odometer tampering and
disclosure. (1) A person that violates 49
U.S.C. Chapter 327 or a regulation
prescribed or order issued thereunder is
liable to the United States Government
for a civil penalty of not more than
$10,932 for each violation. A separate
violation occurs for each motor vehicle
or device involved in the violation. The
maximum civil penalty under this
paragraph for a related series of
violations is $1,093,233.
(2) A person that violates 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 327 or a regulation prescribed
or order issued thereunder, with intent
to defraud, is liable for three times the
actual damages or $10,932, whichever is
greater.
(g) Vehicle theft protection. (1) A
person that violates 49 U.S.C.
33114(a)(1)–(4) is liable to the United
States Government for a civil penalty of
not more than $2,402 for each violation.
The failure of more than one part of a
single motor vehicle to conform to an
applicable standard under 49 U.S.C.
33102 or 33103 is only a single
violation. The maximum penalty under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:26 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
this paragraph for a related series of
violations is $600,388.
(2) A person that violates 49 U.S.C.
33114(a)(5) is liable to the United States
Government for a civil penalty of not
more than $178,338 a day for each
violation.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Medium- and heavy-duty vehicle
fuel efficiency. The maximum civil
penalty for a violation of the fuel
consumption standards of 49 CFR part
535 is not more than $41,882 per
vehicle or engine. The maximum civil
penalty for a related series of violations
shall be determined by multiplying
$41,882 times the vehicle or engine
production volume for the model year
in question within the regulatory
averaging set.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated at 49 CFR 1.27(n), on: June 26,
2019.
Steven G. Bradbury,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2019–14101 Filed 7–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
22 CFR Part 203
RIN 0412–AA91
Streamlining the Registration Process
for Private Voluntary Organizations
U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
USAID is issuing a final rule
to rescind the Agency’s rules to
streamline the registration process for
Private Voluntary Organizations (PVOs).
Foreign assistance has evolved since the
establishment of the requirement that
PVOs register with USAID, and a careful
review of the Agency’s business
practices has concluded that there is no
longer a need for the current, timeconsuming and costly Agency-wide
process. The remaining USAID
programs required by statute to register
PVOs as a condition of eligibility have
incorporated a simplified registration
process into each of their applications
for funding. USAID published the
proposed rule and has determined to
adopt a final rule to support
streamlining the PVO registration
process.
DATES: This rule is effective August 30,
2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Grant, Telephone: (202) 712–
0497 or email: dgrant@usaid.gov
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37079
On
February 12, 2019 (84 FR 3351), USAID
issued a proposed rule to rescind part
203 of title 22 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) (22 CFR part 203) to
streamline the registration process for
PVOs. Effective upon the publication of
this final rule, PVOs would no longer be
required to register with USAID to
compete for funding, with the exception
of organizations that apply for the
Limited Excess-Property Program
(LEPP), the Ocean-Freight
Reimbursement Program (OFR), or to
other Federal Departments and Agencies
under Section 607(a) of the Foreign
Assistance Act (FAA). Applicants to the
LEPP, the OFR, and for assistance under
Section 607(a) of the FAA must
complete and submit to USAID a selfcertification form to indicate they
qualify as a PVO. The self-certification
form, which an authorized
representative of the applicant
organization must sign, requires that a
PVO confirm whether it is registered as
a U.S.-based organization or an
international PVO. Rescission of 22 CFR
part 203 is expected to reduce the
burden on the public significantly;
produce a total estimated annual cost
savings of $779,406 to USAID; and offer
significant savings for the PVO
community, projected to range from
approximately $2 million to $11 million
per year.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Discussion of Comments
USAID received one set of comments
from an individual in response to the
proposed rule. A discussion of these
comments follows:
The commenter sought clarification
on the rule and the rulemaking process,
in addition to the laws associated with
the registration of PVOs. The three
USAID programs that require
registration because of statute are the
LEPP, the OFR, and applications to
other U.S. Government Departments and
Agencies that seek to provide foreign
assistance in accordance with Section
607(a) of the FAA. The statute is silent
on the methodology for registration.
While 22 CFR part 203 details a specific
process, USAID has determined it is
duplicative of pre-award assessments
and due-diligence requirements the
Agency already undertakes with all
prospective awardees. Maintaining both
sets of requirements imposes a
significant cost burden on PVOs (and
PVOs only) to obtain and maintain
registration, a process largely duplicated
if a PVO is considered for an award.
Replacing 22 CFR part 203 with a
legally compliant, simplified selfcertification would streamline the
process significantly. USAID is updating
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
37080
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
this process not because of changes in
law or new legal requirements, but to
reduce costs and eliminate unnecessary
regulation. Only PVOs participating in
the three specific programs mentioned
above would have to self-certify, and the
Bureaus and Independent Offices within
USAID that manage these programs
would provide guidance as necessary as
part of implementing them.
Maintenance of a PVO registry is not
necessary to implement these programs.
In addition, no law requires maintaining
a database of PVOs, which is
duplicative of the role private rating
organizations now play. While different
from the focus of the PVO-registration
program, initially established to help
achieve USAID’s internationaldevelopment mission, private rating
organizations offer the transparency on
service organizations that the PVOregistration process had also provided,
although that was not the purpose of
USAID’s PVO-registration program.
USAID published the proposed rule
on February 12, 2019, and issuance of
this final rule serves as USAID’s
notification to, and request for, input
from the public on the streamlined
registration process for PVOs.
B. Background
USAID is issuing this final rule to
rescind 22 CFR part 203, which codified
the rules for PVO registration with
USAID and provided the registration
process for PVOs, including the
conditions for registration and
documentation required to be submitted
to USAID to complete a registration, as
well as detailing the annual renewals
and termination processes.
USAID has rescinded 22 CFR part 203
because the process to register PVOs is
no longer needed for the majority of
programs open to PVOs across the
Agency. Therefore, the Agency has
streamlined it to apply only to programs
that require registration by statute
(LEPP, OFR, and applications to other
U.S. Government Departments and
Agencies that seek to provide foreign
assistance in accordance with Section
607(a) of the FAA). Combined, these
programs serve fewer than 50
organizations.
USAID initially established its
process to register PVOs to ensure an
organization met the definition of a PVO
and specific organizational standards.
Today, USAID examines all potential
partner organizations, PVOs or
otherwise, via a pre-award assessment
managed by warranted USAID
Agreement/Contract Officers in
accordance with Agency policy
(Automated Directives System [ADS]
Chapter 303: Grants and Cooperative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:26 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
Agreements to Non-Governmental
Organizations; and ADS Chapter 302:
USAID Direct Contracting), and as
required by relevant regulations (i.e., 2
CFR 200.205 for assistance, and 48 CFR
part 9 for contracts). The due-diligence
process for registering PVOs under 22
CFR part 203 is duplicative of these preaward assessments, and organizations
spend a substantial amount of time and
money to obtain and maintain
registration. Finally, USAID’s PVO
registration has historically played the
role that private rating organizations
now play—publishing data on PVOs
and other types of non-governmental
organizations. The extensive
information publicly available through
other providers has eliminated the
Agency’s need to produce information
on the sector through the maintenance
and publication of a registry.
C. Impact Assessment
(1) Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and
13563—Regulatory Planning and
Review
Under E.O. 12866, USAID must
determine whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to
the requirements of the E.O. and subject
to review by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). USAID has
determined that 22 CFR part 203 is not
an ‘‘economically significant regulatory
action’’ under Section 3(f)(1) of E.O.
12866. This final rule is not a major rule
under Section 804 of Title 5 of the
United States Code (U.S.C.).
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct Federal
Departments and Agencies to assess all
the costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives, and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. Streamlining the duplicative
Agency-wide registration program
would eliminate thousands of labor
hours and save hundreds of thousands
of dollars for USAID and the estimated
550 PVOs currently registered with the
Agency.
USAID uses a contractor to manage
the PVO-registration process, which
costs the Agency approximately
$700,000 per year. In addition, internal
USAID annual labor costs related to the
registration process amount to $79,406
in burdened salary and benefit expenses
(50 percent of a General Schedule [GS]13 Full-Time Equivalent [FTE]). With
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this deregulation, USAID anticipates
saving $779,406 in Federal Government
costs per year.
Moreover, USAID estimates that the
deregulation would generate significant
cost-savings for affected PVOs. USAID
recently surveyed all 550 PVO
registrants to quantify the burden
associated with the registration process.
Within the past ten years, the number of
PVOs registered with USAID on an
annual basis has been consistent,
ranging from 550 to 553 PVOs per year.
Based on the results of the survey,
USAID estimates that all 550 PVO
registrants spent a total of 4,378 hours
per year to prepare and file the
registration forms.
Using market research, USAID
estimates that the burdened labor cost
for PVO staff to conduct tasks related to
registration ranges from $40 to $80 per
hour.1 Applying those rates to the total
4,378 personnel hours yields an
estimated cost that ranges from
$175,120 to $350,240 for PVO staff to
register.
In addition, with rescission of the
rule, USAID concludes that PVOs would
achieve significant further cost-savings,
because a component of the registration
process is the requirement to conduct an
external financial audit. USAID
estimated the total number of external
audits conducted only for the purposes
of registering as a PVO, but not used
because the organization did not receive
an award from USAID, range from 183
to 367. Based on market research,2 past
experience, and consultations with
registered PVOs, the average cost of an
independent audit ranges from $10,000
to $30,000. USAID then calculated a low
estimate and high estimate of costsavings. For the high estimate, USAID
applied the rate of $30,000 to 367
registrants (two-thirds of the 550 total
registrants) that do not receive an
award. This yields an annual total of
$11,010,000 in ‘‘unfruitful’’ expenses
avoided. For the low estimate, we
applied the $10,000 rate as the audit
cost, and added the assumption that half
of registrants without awards would
have procured financial audits even in
the absence of the rule. Multiplying
$10,000 by 183 (one-third of the 550
total registrants) yields a total of
$1,830,000 for our low-cost estimate of
1 Calculated based on nationwide data on
nonprofit program manager salaries (https://
www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/nonprofit-programmanager-salary-SRCH_KO0,25.htm), with employee
benefit costs added into the hourly rates (https://
www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm).
2 https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/nonprofitaudit-guide/what-is-independent-audit, https://
www.financialexecutives.org/ferf/download/
2015%20Final/2015–018.pdf
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
cost-savings associated with avoided
audit expenses. When estimates for PVO
staff time and financial audits are
combined, the cost savings for affected
PVOs ranges from $2,005,120 to
$11,360,240. When added to the
expected costs internal to USAID of
$779,406, the annual total of
incremental cost savings as a result of
the rescission ranges from $2,784,526 to
$12,139,646. Therefore, the rescission of
our PVO-registration rule would
benefits USAID and our PVOs by
streamlining processes and achieving
significant cost-savings.
2. Executive Order (E.O.) 13771
This rule is considered an E.O. 13771
deregulatory action. Details on the
estimated cost-savings of this rule
appear in the rule’s economic analysis.
3. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because the rescission of this
regulation removes, rather than
imposes, the collection of information,
USAID certifies that the rescission
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
4. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3507) applies to this rule,
because it removes informationcollection requirements formerly
approved by OMB. Rescission of this
rule would reduce paperwork
significantly and eliminate informationcollection requirements on the 550
PVOs that currently register with the
Agency. USAID collects information
from all registered PVOs as part of the
registration requirement, such as
financial data and a costly external
financial audit, to determine whether
the PVO meets the conditions of
registration. Under the revised
approach, only organizations that apply
for the Agency’s LEPP or OFR, or to
other U.S. Government Departments and
Agencies that seek to provide foreign
assistance (about 50 organizations in
total) would have to certify they meet
USAID’s PVO requirements through the
new, streamlined certification process
described earlier. USAID would not
collect any other data or demand extra
financial audits from these
organizations.
USAID previously collected
information for to register PVOs under
the OMB-approved AID Form 1550–2
(OMB Approval Number 0412–0035),
but inadvertently operated in noncompliance with the PRA when OMB
approval of this form expired, and
USAID did not seek extension of the
OMB approval when the Agency moved
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:26 Jul 30, 2019
Jkt 247001
to an on-line system for PVO
registration. USAID’s online PVOregistration system required that PVOs
provide the same information requested
on AID Form 1550–2, including
financial data. As such, the publicreporting burden for collection of
information remained the same under
the on-line system.
5. Administrative Procedures Act
USAID is issuing this deregulatory
action to remove an unneeded hurdle to
doing business with the Agency that
imposes unnecessary and excessive
costs on the private sector with no value
to the Government. The rescinded rule
originally called for the collection of
information, such as a company’s makeup of volunteers—since obviated once
statutory changes removed the volunteer
requirement. Apart from that
requirement, statutory references to the
registration of PVOs (such as those in
Sections 123 or 607 of the FAA) provide
no further guidance or requirements to
the Agency on what such registration
should entail. By rescinding this rule,
the Agency would be free to simplify
and streamline registration to remove
barriers that impose expenses on
smaller organizations that wish to
compete for USAID funds.
USAID also conducted surveys of the
primary stakeholders to the registration
process—that of Agency’s internal
stakeholders and the PVO community.
Surveys of registered PVOs in 2012 and
2017 showed that the PVO community
did not see significant value in the
registration program delineated by 22
CFR part 203, and internal stakeholders
for the Agency determined that the
information collected in accordance
with 22 CFR 203 served no purpose for
the Agency. These findings contributed
to the decision to remove both the
registration program and the rule that
required such a rigorous registration
process. Additionally, USAID does not
plan to replace the current rule with any
other.
For the LEPP, the OFR, and PVOs that
apply to other U.S. Government
Departments and Agencies that are
seeking to provide foreign assistance
under Section 607(a) of the FAA, all of
which still require registration because
of legislative requirements, as provided
above, the Agency has developed a
simplified registration process as part of
the application process.
List of Subjects for 22 CFR Part 203
Foreign aid, Nonprofit organizations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37081
PART 203—[REMOVED]
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, and under the authority of
Sec. 621, Public Law 87–195, 75 Stat.
445, (22 U.S.C. 2381), as amended; E.O.
12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 FR 56673, 3
CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435, USAID
removes 22 CFR part 203.
■
Carrie Thompson,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Bureau for
Economic Growth, Education, and the
Environment.
[FR Doc. 2019–15685 Filed 7–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Parts 2 and 7
[Docket No. PTO–T–2017–0004]
RIN 0651–AD15
Changes to the Trademark Rules of
Practice To Mandate Electronic Filing
Patent and Trademark Office,
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO or Office)
amends the Rules of Practice in
Trademark Cases and the Rules of
Practice in Filings Pursuant to the
Protocol Relating to the Madrid
Agreement Concerning the International
Registration of Marks to mandate
electronic filing of trademark
applications and all submissions
associated with trademark applications
and registrations, and to require the
designation of an email address for
receiving USPTO correspondence, with
limited exceptions. This rule advances
the USPTO’s IT strategy to achieve
complete end-to-end electronic
processing of trademark-related
submissions, thereby improving
administrative efficiency by facilitating
electronic file management, optimizing
workflow processes, and reducing
processing errors.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Cain, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for Trademark
Examination Policy, TMPolicy@
uspto.gov, (571) 272–8946.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose: The USPTO revises the rules
in parts 2 and 7 of title 37 of the Code
of Federal Regulations to require
electronic filing through the USPTO’s
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 31, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37079-37081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15685]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
22 CFR Part 203
RIN 0412-AA91
Streamlining the Registration Process for Private Voluntary
Organizations
AGENCY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: USAID is issuing a final rule to rescind the Agency's rules to
streamline the registration process for Private Voluntary Organizations
(PVOs). Foreign assistance has evolved since the establishment of the
requirement that PVOs register with USAID, and a careful review of the
Agency's business practices has concluded that there is no longer a
need for the current, time-consuming and costly Agency-wide process.
The remaining USAID programs required by statute to register PVOs as a
condition of eligibility have incorporated a simplified registration
process into each of their applications for funding. USAID published
the proposed rule and has determined to adopt a final rule to support
streamlining the PVO registration process.
DATES: This rule is effective August 30, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Grant, Telephone: (202) 712-
0497 or email: [email protected]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 12, 2019 (84 FR 3351), USAID
issued a proposed rule to rescind part 203 of title 22 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) (22 CFR part 203) to streamline the
registration process for PVOs. Effective upon the publication of this
final rule, PVOs would no longer be required to register with USAID to
compete for funding, with the exception of organizations that apply for
the Limited Excess-Property Program (LEPP), the Ocean-Freight
Reimbursement Program (OFR), or to other Federal Departments and
Agencies under Section 607(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA).
Applicants to the LEPP, the OFR, and for assistance under Section
607(a) of the FAA must complete and submit to USAID a self-
certification form to indicate they qualify as a PVO. The self-
certification form, which an authorized representative of the applicant
organization must sign, requires that a PVO confirm whether it is
registered as a U.S.-based organization or an international PVO.
Rescission of 22 CFR part 203 is expected to reduce the burden on the
public significantly; produce a total estimated annual cost savings of
$779,406 to USAID; and offer significant savings for the PVO community,
projected to range from approximately $2 million to $11 million per
year.
A. Discussion of Comments
USAID received one set of comments from an individual in response
to the proposed rule. A discussion of these comments follows:
The commenter sought clarification on the rule and the rulemaking
process, in addition to the laws associated with the registration of
PVOs. The three USAID programs that require registration because of
statute are the LEPP, the OFR, and applications to other U.S.
Government Departments and Agencies that seek to provide foreign
assistance in accordance with Section 607(a) of the FAA. The statute is
silent on the methodology for registration. While 22 CFR part 203
details a specific process, USAID has determined it is duplicative of
pre-award assessments and due-diligence requirements the Agency already
undertakes with all prospective awardees. Maintaining both sets of
requirements imposes a significant cost burden on PVOs (and PVOs only)
to obtain and maintain registration, a process largely duplicated if a
PVO is considered for an award. Replacing 22 CFR part 203 with a
legally compliant, simplified self-certification would streamline the
process significantly. USAID is updating
[[Page 37080]]
this process not because of changes in law or new legal requirements,
but to reduce costs and eliminate unnecessary regulation. Only PVOs
participating in the three specific programs mentioned above would have
to self-certify, and the Bureaus and Independent Offices within USAID
that manage these programs would provide guidance as necessary as part
of implementing them. Maintenance of a PVO registry is not necessary to
implement these programs. In addition, no law requires maintaining a
database of PVOs, which is duplicative of the role private rating
organizations now play. While different from the focus of the PVO-
registration program, initially established to help achieve USAID's
international-development mission, private rating organizations offer
the transparency on service organizations that the PVO-registration
process had also provided, although that was not the purpose of USAID's
PVO-registration program.
USAID published the proposed rule on February 12, 2019, and
issuance of this final rule serves as USAID's notification to, and
request for, input from the public on the streamlined registration
process for PVOs.
B. Background
USAID is issuing this final rule to rescind 22 CFR part 203, which
codified the rules for PVO registration with USAID and provided the
registration process for PVOs, including the conditions for
registration and documentation required to be submitted to USAID to
complete a registration, as well as detailing the annual renewals and
termination processes.
USAID has rescinded 22 CFR part 203 because the process to register
PVOs is no longer needed for the majority of programs open to PVOs
across the Agency. Therefore, the Agency has streamlined it to apply
only to programs that require registration by statute (LEPP, OFR, and
applications to other U.S. Government Departments and Agencies that
seek to provide foreign assistance in accordance with Section 607(a) of
the FAA). Combined, these programs serve fewer than 50 organizations.
USAID initially established its process to register PVOs to ensure
an organization met the definition of a PVO and specific organizational
standards. Today, USAID examines all potential partner organizations,
PVOs or otherwise, via a pre-award assessment managed by warranted
USAID Agreement/Contract Officers in accordance with Agency policy
(Automated Directives System [ADS] Chapter 303: Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to Non-Governmental Organizations; and ADS Chapter 302:
USAID Direct Contracting), and as required by relevant regulations
(i.e., 2 CFR 200.205 for assistance, and 48 CFR part 9 for contracts).
The due-diligence process for registering PVOs under 22 CFR part 203 is
duplicative of these pre-award assessments, and organizations spend a
substantial amount of time and money to obtain and maintain
registration. Finally, USAID's PVO registration has historically played
the role that private rating organizations now play--publishing data on
PVOs and other types of non-governmental organizations. The extensive
information publicly available through other providers has eliminated
the Agency's need to produce information on the sector through the
maintenance and publication of a registry.
C. Impact Assessment
(1) Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and 13563--Regulatory Planning and
Review
Under E.O. 12866, USAID must determine whether a regulatory action
is ``significant'' and therefore subject to the requirements of the
E.O. and subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). USAID has determined that 22 CFR part 203 is not an
``economically significant regulatory action'' under Section 3(f)(1) of
E.O. 12866. This final rule is not a major rule under Section 804 of
Title 5 of the United States Code (U.S.C.).
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct Federal Departments and Agencies to
assess all the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives,
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Streamlining the duplicative Agency-wide registration program would
eliminate thousands of labor hours and save hundreds of thousands of
dollars for USAID and the estimated 550 PVOs currently registered with
the Agency.
USAID uses a contractor to manage the PVO-registration process,
which costs the Agency approximately $700,000 per year. In addition,
internal USAID annual labor costs related to the registration process
amount to $79,406 in burdened salary and benefit expenses (50 percent
of a General Schedule [GS]-13 Full-Time Equivalent [FTE]). With this
deregulation, USAID anticipates saving $779,406 in Federal Government
costs per year.
Moreover, USAID estimates that the deregulation would generate
significant cost-savings for affected PVOs. USAID recently surveyed all
550 PVO registrants to quantify the burden associated with the
registration process. Within the past ten years, the number of PVOs
registered with USAID on an annual basis has been consistent, ranging
from 550 to 553 PVOs per year. Based on the results of the survey,
USAID estimates that all 550 PVO registrants spent a total of 4,378
hours per year to prepare and file the registration forms.
Using market research, USAID estimates that the burdened labor cost
for PVO staff to conduct tasks related to registration ranges from $40
to $80 per hour.\1\ Applying those rates to the total 4,378 personnel
hours yields an estimated cost that ranges from $175,120 to $350,240
for PVO staff to register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Calculated based on nationwide data on nonprofit program
manager salaries (https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/nonprofit-program-manager-salary-SRCH_KO0,25.htm), with employee benefit costs
added into the hourly rates (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, with rescission of the rule, USAID concludes that PVOs
would achieve significant further cost-savings, because a component of
the registration process is the requirement to conduct an external
financial audit. USAID estimated the total number of external audits
conducted only for the purposes of registering as a PVO, but not used
because the organization did not receive an award from USAID, range
from 183 to 367. Based on market research,\2\ past experience, and
consultations with registered PVOs, the average cost of an independent
audit ranges from $10,000 to $30,000. USAID then calculated a low
estimate and high estimate of cost-savings. For the high estimate,
USAID applied the rate of $30,000 to 367 registrants (two-thirds of the
550 total registrants) that do not receive an award. This yields an
annual total of $11,010,000 in ``unfruitful'' expenses avoided. For the
low estimate, we applied the $10,000 rate as the audit cost, and added
the assumption that half of registrants without awards would have
procured financial audits even in the absence of the rule. Multiplying
$10,000 by 183 (one-third of the 550 total registrants) yields a total
of $1,830,000 for our low-cost estimate of
[[Page 37081]]
cost-savings associated with avoided audit expenses. When estimates for
PVO staff time and financial audits are combined, the cost savings for
affected PVOs ranges from $2,005,120 to $11,360,240. When added to the
expected costs internal to USAID of $779,406, the annual total of
incremental cost savings as a result of the rescission ranges from
$2,784,526 to $12,139,646. Therefore, the rescission of our PVO-
registration rule would benefits USAID and our PVOs by streamlining
processes and achieving significant cost-savings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/nonprofit-audit-guide/what-is-independent-audit, https://www.financialexecutives.org/ferf/download/2015%20Final/2015-018.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Executive Order (E.O.) 13771
This rule is considered an E.O. 13771 deregulatory action. Details
on the estimated cost-savings of this rule appear in the rule's
economic analysis.
3. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because the rescission of this regulation removes, rather than
imposes, the collection of information, USAID certifies that the
rescission would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
4. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) applies to this rule,
because it removes information-collection requirements formerly
approved by OMB. Rescission of this rule would reduce paperwork
significantly and eliminate information-collection requirements on the
550 PVOs that currently register with the Agency. USAID collects
information from all registered PVOs as part of the registration
requirement, such as financial data and a costly external financial
audit, to determine whether the PVO meets the conditions of
registration. Under the revised approach, only organizations that apply
for the Agency's LEPP or OFR, or to other U.S. Government Departments
and Agencies that seek to provide foreign assistance (about 50
organizations in total) would have to certify they meet USAID's PVO
requirements through the new, streamlined certification process
described earlier. USAID would not collect any other data or demand
extra financial audits from these organizations.
USAID previously collected information for to register PVOs under
the OMB-approved AID Form 1550-2 (OMB Approval Number 0412-0035), but
inadvertently operated in non-compliance with the PRA when OMB approval
of this form expired, and USAID did not seek extension of the OMB
approval when the Agency moved to an on-line system for PVO
registration. USAID's online PVO-registration system required that PVOs
provide the same information requested on AID Form 1550-2, including
financial data. As such, the public-reporting burden for collection of
information remained the same under the on-line system.
5. Administrative Procedures Act
USAID is issuing this deregulatory action to remove an unneeded
hurdle to doing business with the Agency that imposes unnecessary and
excessive costs on the private sector with no value to the Government.
The rescinded rule originally called for the collection of information,
such as a company's make-up of volunteers--since obviated once
statutory changes removed the volunteer requirement. Apart from that
requirement, statutory references to the registration of PVOs (such as
those in Sections 123 or 607 of the FAA) provide no further guidance or
requirements to the Agency on what such registration should entail. By
rescinding this rule, the Agency would be free to simplify and
streamline registration to remove barriers that impose expenses on
smaller organizations that wish to compete for USAID funds.
USAID also conducted surveys of the primary stakeholders to the
registration process--that of Agency's internal stakeholders and the
PVO community. Surveys of registered PVOs in 2012 and 2017 showed that
the PVO community did not see significant value in the registration
program delineated by 22 CFR part 203, and internal stakeholders for
the Agency determined that the information collected in accordance with
22 CFR 203 served no purpose for the Agency. These findings contributed
to the decision to remove both the registration program and the rule
that required such a rigorous registration process. Additionally, USAID
does not plan to replace the current rule with any other.
For the LEPP, the OFR, and PVOs that apply to other U.S. Government
Departments and Agencies that are seeking to provide foreign assistance
under Section 607(a) of the FAA, all of which still require
registration because of legislative requirements, as provided above,
the Agency has developed a simplified registration process as part of
the application process.
List of Subjects for 22 CFR Part 203
Foreign aid, Nonprofit organizations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 203--[REMOVED]
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, and under the authority of
Sec. 621, Public Law 87-195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381), as
amended; E.O. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 FR 56673, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p.
435, USAID removes 22 CFR part 203.
Carrie Thompson,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Economic Growth, Education,
and the Environment.
[FR Doc. 2019-15685 Filed 7-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P