Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 36603-36606 [2019-15986]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
has been resolved, and notify the
Requestor in writing of the notification
to the Commission. Informal resolution
of a matter does not prevent the
Requestor from seeking Commission
consideration, in an additional or
subsequent determination, subject to the
requirements of this program.
After the recommendation is
circulated for a Commission vote, in the
event of an objection, the matter shall be
automatically placed on the next
meeting agenda consistent with the
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(g), and
applicable Commission regulations, 11
CFR part 2. However, if within 60
business days of the filing of a request
for consideration, the Commission has
not resolved the issue or provided
guidance on how to proceed with the
matter by the affirmative vote of four or
more Commissioners, the OC may
proceed with the matter. After the 60
business days has elapsed, any
requestor will be provided a copy of
OGC’s recommendation memorandum
and an accompanying vote certification,
or if no such certification exists, a cover
page stating the disposition of the
memoranda. Confidential information
will be redacted as necessary.
After the request review process has
concluded, or a Final Audit Report has
been approved, a copy of the request for
consideration, as well as the
recommendation memorandum and
accompanying vote certification or
disposition memorandum, will be
placed with the Committee’s filings or
audit documents on the Commission’s
website within 30 days. These materials
will also be placed on the Commission’s
web page dedicated to legal questions
considered by the Commission under
this program.
This procedure is not intended to
circumvent or supplant the Advisory
Opinion process provided under 52
U.S.C. 30108 and 11 CFR part 112.
Accordingly, any legal issues that
qualify for consideration under the
Advisory Opinion process are not
appropriate for consideration under this
new procedure. Additionally, this
policy statement does not supersede the
procedures regarding eligibility and
entitlement to public funds set forth in
Commission Directive 24 and 11 CFR
9005.1, 9033.4, 9033.6 or 9033.10.
II. Annual Review
No later than July 1 of each year, the
OC and OGC shall jointly prepare and
distribute to the Commission a written
report containing a summary of the
requests made under the program over
the previous year and a summary of the
Commission’s consideration of those
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Jul 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
requests and any action taken thereon.
The annual report shall also include the
Chief Compliance Officer’s and the
General Counsel’s assessment of
whether, and to what extent, the
program has promoted efficiency and
fairness in both the Commission’s report
review process and in the audit process,
as well as their recommendations, if
any, for modifications to the program.
The Commission may terminate or
modify this program through additional
policy statements at any time by an
affirmative vote of four of its members.
Dated: July 23, 2019.
On behalf of the Commission.
Ellen Weintraub,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–15988 Filed 7–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than August 22,
2019.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36603
President), 90 Hennepin Avenue,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480–0291:
1. Frandsen Financial Corporation,
Arden Hills, Minnesota; to acquire 100
percent of the voting shares of Peoples
Bank Midwest, Hayward, Wisconsin.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, July 23, 2019.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2019–15976 Filed 7–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project
‘‘Evaluating and Implementing the Six
Building Blocks Team Approach to
Improve Opioid Management in Primary
Care.’’ In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, AHRQ
invites the public to comment on this
proposed information collection. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register on April 12, 2019, and allowed
60 days for public comment. AHRQ did
not receive any substantive comments.
The purpose of this notice is to allow an
additional 30 days for public comment.
SUMMARY:
Comments on this notice must be
received by 30 days after date of
publication.
DATES:
Written comments should
be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk
Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974
(attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by
email at OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ’s desk
officer).
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
36604
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2019 / Notices
Proposed Project
Method of Collection
Evaluating and Implementing the Six
Building Blocks Team Approach To
Improve Opioid Management in Primary
Care
To achieve the goals of this project the
following data collections will be
implemented:
(1) Clinical Staff Survey. A brief
survey will be administered
electronically to all clinical staff,
including primary care physicians,
nurse practitioners, physician assistants,
social workers, medical assistants,
registered nurses, pharmacists and
behavioral health workers, toward the
beginning of 6BBs Toolkit
implementation and approximately 12
months later. A quality improvement
(QI) point person will provide email
addresses for the staff who will be
invited to complete the survey from
each participating organization. These
email addresses will be used to send
clinical staff the surveys at both time
points. The survey will collect
information about staff’s self-reported
use of evidence-based opioid
prescribing practices; procedures in
place around opioid prescribing
management; self efficacy regarding safe
opioid prescribing; knowledge, beliefs
and attitudes regarding opioid
prescribing; adaptive reserve; selfreported burnout; and reported
implementation experiences. The
survey will also collect information
about staffs’ background (e.g., clinic role
and tenure). The survey will consist
largely of closed-ended questions (e.g.,
scale or Likert response options) with
several open-ended questions.
(2) Staff Interviews. Interviews will be
conducted with 5 staff at each of the 15
participating health care organizations.
AHRQ will conduct 2 rounds of
interviews, with the first round
occurring within several months after
the How-To-Guide is distributed to the
organization and the second round
occurring 12 months later. The
evaluation team will conduct in-depth
interviews with:
a. The quality improvement (QI) lead
and
b. Four additional staff who are
involved in 6BBs implementation at
each organization, that might include a
clinician, information technology
analyst, social worker, behavioral health
specialist, and/or care coordinator.
Staff interviewees will be selected by
the QI lead at each organization, who
will be asked to nominate a range of
staff from those who embraced changes
to those who were less willing to
implement changes. Interviews will
capture qualitative data regarding the
organization’s history with efforts to
curb opioid prescribing, experiences
using the How-To-Guide,
implementation of the 6BB intervention
The project ‘‘Evaluating and
Implementing the Six Building Blocks
Team Approach to Improve Opioid
Management in Primary Care’’ fully
supports AHRQ’s mission. The ultimate
aim of this project is to further validate
and expand the Six Building Blocks to
Safer Opioid Management (6BBs)
intervention and its associated resources
and guidance to support primary care
providers in safer opioid prescribing.
Opioid overdose deaths have
increased dramatically since 1999, and
despite recent decreases in the national
opioid prescribing rate, prescribing rates
remain high in many U.S. counties.
Primary care providers (PCPs) are
responsible for about half of all
dispensed opioid pain relievers. To
address the emerging opioid epidemic,
the Six Building Blocks to Safer Opioid
Management (6BBs) Toolkit has been
developed to support primary care
providers in safer opioid prescribing,
largely concordant with the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention’s
Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for
Chronic Pain. The 6BBs is a structured,
systems-based approach for improving
management of patients on long-term
opioid therapy that targets six work
areas a primary care practice needs to
redesign in order to improve their
clinic’s management of patients on longterm opioid therapy.
Building upon previous work
supported by AHRQ to address the
opioid epidemic, this research has the
following goals:
1. To improve the guidance for the
6BBs Toolkit,
2. To further implement the 6BBs in
primary care practices, and
3. To understand the facilitators and
barriers to implementing the Six
Building Blocks to Safer Opioid
Management.
This study is being conducted by
AHRQ through its contractor, Abt
Associates Inc., pursuant to AHRQ’s
statutory authority to conduct and
support research on healthcare and on
systems for the delivery of such care,
including activities with respect to the
quality, effectiveness, efficiency,
appropriateness and value of healthcare
services and with respect to quality
measurement and improvement. 42
U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Jul 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and associated opioid management
interventions, and lessons learned that
can be shared with other health care
organizations.
(3) Virtual Launch Meeting. A virtual
launch meeting will be held for
organization liaisons and quality
improvement leaders from participating
health care organizations to launch
6BBs Toolkit implementation. The
meeting will be conducted by webconference, and will last up to 2 hours.
(4) Quarterly Check-In Calls. A project
team member will hold a quarterly
check-in call with organization liaisons
and quality improvement leaders to
assess the progress of implementation of
the 6BBs intervention and improvement
initiatives at each organization. Checkin calls will occur quarterly for up to 12
months. Each call will be up to 60
minutes in duration, and notes will be
taken by an evaluation team member
during each call.
(5) QI Measures. Each health care
organization will be asked to report
quarterly on the number of patients on
long-term opioid therapy and the
proportion of those who are on greater
than 90 morphine milligram
equivalents, co-prescribed a
benzodiazepine, and had the
prescription drug monitoring program
checked and a urine drug screen.
Organizations may also select other
outcome measures aligned to their own
goals.
(6) Other outcome and output data
from administrative records, electronic
medical records, and organizational
documents (Secondary Data). Health
care organizations may also report their
progress on implementing the 6BB
intervention and associated changes in
care processes through completion of
worksheets contained in or associated
with the How-To-Guide. Since these
data collections involve simply
submitting worksheets they complete
for their own benefit while working
through the How-To-Guide, they pose
only minimal data collection burden to
the health care organization, specifically
the person who completes the
worksheets (i.e., QI lead). The project
team will also obtain relevant
organizational documents (e.g., opioid
prescribing policies, quality
improvement plans, sample patient
agreements, relevant practice
workflows, screen shots of data
dashboards).
The purpose of the proposed data
collection effort is to obtain information
needed to modify and enhance the 6BB
How-To-Guide and to provide
information to health care organizations
considering using the How-To-Guide to
improve their opioid prescribing
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
36605
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2019 / Notices
practices and relevant outcomes. Since
this is only a study conducted in 15
organizations, outcomes or impacts will
not be generalizable.
The data collected will help the
project team: (1) Understand the
facilitators and barriers of using the 6BB
Toolkit and recommended
improvements to processes of care and
opioid prescribing practices, and (2)
assess the effectiveness of using the 6BB
Toolkit to improve processes of care and
opioid prescribing practices. The data
collection effort may also provide
insights that could guide dissemination
of the Toolkit. For example, if it was
found that a specific type of
organization included in this pilot study
(e.g., small, stand-alone clinic in a rural
area) particularly benefitted from using
the Toolkit, then AHRQ could tailor and
target its dissemination of the Toolkit to
similar organizations. Once revisions
are made based on results of this
evaluation, the How-To-Guide
corresponding to the Toolkit will be
published on AHRQ’s website. A
manuscript describing the pilot study
and its results will also be produced for
publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 presents estimates of the
reporting burden hours for the data
collection efforts. Time estimates are
based on prior experiences and what
can reasonably be requested of
participating health care organizations.
The number of respondents listed in
column A, Exhibit 1 reflects a projected
75% response rate for data collection
efforts 2a and 2b below. 1. Clinical Staff
Survey. A brief survey will be emailed
to all clinicians both toward the
beginning of 6BBs Toolkit
implementation and approximately 12
months later. We assumed 20 clinical
staff per clinical site, and approximately
50 clinical sites overall (with a range
from 1 clinic to 17 per organization), for
a total of 1,000 staff across all 15
organizations. We assumed 750 clinical
staff will complete the survey based on
a 75% response rate. It is expected to
take up to 15 minutes to complete.
2. Staff Interviews. In-depth
interviews will occur with 5 staff at
each health care organization, for a total
of up to 75 individuals. The evaluation
team will conduct these interviews,
each lasting up to 1 hour, at 2 points in
time with:
a. One QI lead per organization
(toward the start of and at the end of the
project).
b. Four additional staff (e.g., clinician,
information technology analyst, social
worker) per organization (midway
through and at the end of the project).
3. Virtual Launch Meeting. The
meeting will occur with the quality
improvement (QI) leads at participating
health care organizations to launch
6BBs Toolkit implementation. The
meeting will be conducted by webconference, and will last up to 2 hours.
4. Quarterly Check-In Calls. Calls will
occur with QI leads, clinical champions,
and other relevant staff the QI lead
identifies, for a total of no more than 5
individuals per organization. These
calls will assess progress with the
organization’s use of the Toolkit and
implementation of associated practice
changes, and will occur quarterly over
15 months, for a total of 5 quarterly
check-in calls. Each call will take up to
60 minutes.
5. QI Measures. Aggregate reports of
the specified quality measures will be
provided on a quarterly basis over the
course of an 18-month period by a data
analyst at each organization, for a total
of 15 individuals across all 15
organizations. We assume 40 hours total
(10 hours per quarter) for each data
analyst to collect and provide these
data.
6. Other outcome and output data
from administrative records and
organizational documents (Secondary
Data). These secondary data will be
provided by the QI lead at each
organization, for a total of 15
individuals across all 15 organizations.
We assume 4 hours per month for 12
months for a total of 48 hours for each
QI lead to collect and provide these
data.
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Data collection method or project activity
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
A.
B.
C.
D.
1. Clinical Staff Survey * ..................................................................................
2a. Staff Interview—QI Lead ...........................................................................
2b. Staff Interview—Additional Staff ................................................................
3. Virtual Launch Meeting ................................................................................
4. Quarterly Check-In Calls .............................................................................
5. QI Measures ................................................................................................
6. Secondary data ...........................................................................................
750
15
60
15
75
15
15
2
2
2
1
5
4
12
15/60
1
1
2
1
10
4
375
30
120
30
375
600
720
Total ..........................................................................................................
1035
n/a
n/a
2,250
*Number of respondents (Column A) reflects a sample size assuming a 75% response rate for this data collection effort.
Exhibit 2, below, presents the
estimated annualized cost burden
associated with the respondents’ time to
participate in this research. The total
cost burden is estimated to be about
$91,623.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Data collection method or project activity
1. Clinical Staff Survey ....................................................................................
2a. Staff Interview—QI Lead ...........................................................................
2b. Staff Interview—Additional Staff ................................................................
3. Virtual Launch Meeting ................................................................................
4. Quarterly Check-In Calls .............................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Jul 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total burden
hours
750
15
60
15
75
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
375
30
120
30
375
29JYN1
Average
hourly wage
rate *
$48.45
53.69
38.83
53.69
38.83
Total cost
burden
$18,169
1,611
4,660
1,611
14,561
36606
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2019 / Notices
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN—Continued
Number of
respondents
Data collection method or project activity
Average
hourly wage
rate *
Total cost
burden
5. QI Measures ................................................................................................
6. Secondary data ...........................................................................................
15
15
600
720
20.59
53.69
12,354
38,657
Total ..........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
91,623
The average hourly rate of $48.45 for
the clinical staff survey was calculated
based on the 2017 mean hourly wage
rate for health diagnosing and treating
practitioners, $48.45 (occupation code
29–1000).
The average hourly rate of $53.69 for
QI lead interviews was calculated based
on the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for
medical and health services managers,
$53.69 (occupation code 11–9111). The
average hourly rate of $38.83 for staff
interviews was calculated based on the
2017 mean hourly wage rate for
healthcare practitioners and technical
occupations, $38.83 (occupation code
29–0000).
The average hourly rate of $53.69 for
the virtual launch meeting was
calculated based on the 2017 mean
hourly wage rate for medical and health
services managers, $53.69 (occupation
code 11–9111).
The average hourly wage rate of
$38.83 for quarterly check-in calls was
calculated based on the 2017 mean
hourly wage rate for healthcare
practitioners and technical occupations,
$38.83 (occupation code 29–0000).
The average hourly rate of $20.59 for
QI measures was calculated based on
the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for
medical records and health information
technicians, $20.59 (occupation code
29–2071).
The average hourly rate of $53.69 for
secondary data was calculated based on
the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for
medical and health services managers,
$53.69 (occupation code 11–9111).
Mean hourly wage rates for these
groups of occupations were obtained
from the Bureau of Labor & Statistics on
‘‘Occupational Employment and Wages,
May 2017’’ found at the following URL:
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_
nat.htm#b29-0000.htm.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Total burden
hours
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ’s
information collection are requested
with regard to any of the following: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of AHRQ’s health care
research and health care information
dissemination functions, including
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Jul 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including
hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: July 23, 2019.
Virginia L. Mackay-Smith,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2019–15986 Filed 7–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project:
‘‘Embedded Research in Care Delivery
Systems.’’
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by 60 days after date of
publication.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
‘‘Embedded Research in Care Delivery
Systems’’
Embedded researchers contribute to
learning health systems by collaborating
with delivery system stakeholders to
produce innovations and evidence that
can be rapidly implemented to improve
the outcomes of individuals and
populations and health system
performance.
Research is defined in this proposed
project as embedded when it is
conducted by an investigator who is
employed or closely affiliated with the
care delivery system and when the
research project at least partially
addresses operational concerns of the
system (e.g., ways to improve care
quality, value, or other aspects of system
performance, such as patient and staff
satisfaction).
AHRQ is developing tools and
findings to support learning health
systems and embedded research, and is
funding training of researchers to
conduct embedded research.
The proposed project has the
following goals:
• Select health care delivery systems
that currently apply diverse and
distinctive strategies for embedded
research.
• Conduct and report on qualitative
case studies documenting how
embedded research is prioritized,
funded, managed, conducted, and used
in these systems.
• Specify several promising strategies
for organizing and conducting
embedded research.
• Provide summaries of study
findings that will stimulate
consideration of current and future
strategies for embedded research among
funders, trainers, and delivery system
leaders.
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36603-36606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15986]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection
project ``Evaluating and Implementing the Six Building Blocks Team
Approach to Improve Opioid Management in Primary Care.'' In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act, AHRQ invites the public to comment on
this proposed information collection. This proposed information
collection was previously published in the Federal Register on April
12, 2019, and allowed 60 days for public comment. AHRQ did not receive
any substantive comments. The purpose of this notice is to allow an
additional 30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by 30 days after date
of publication.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ's OMB Desk
Officer by fax at (202) 395-6974 (attention: AHRQ's desk officer) or by
email at [email protected] (attention: AHRQ's desk officer).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 36604]]
Proposed Project
Evaluating and Implementing the Six Building Blocks Team Approach To
Improve Opioid Management in Primary Care
The project ``Evaluating and Implementing the Six Building Blocks
Team Approach to Improve Opioid Management in Primary Care'' fully
supports AHRQ's mission. The ultimate aim of this project is to further
validate and expand the Six Building Blocks to Safer Opioid Management
(6BBs) intervention and its associated resources and guidance to
support primary care providers in safer opioid prescribing.
Opioid overdose deaths have increased dramatically since 1999, and
despite recent decreases in the national opioid prescribing rate,
prescribing rates remain high in many U.S. counties. Primary care
providers (PCPs) are responsible for about half of all dispensed opioid
pain relievers. To address the emerging opioid epidemic, the Six
Building Blocks to Safer Opioid Management (6BBs) Toolkit has been
developed to support primary care providers in safer opioid
prescribing, largely concordant with the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention's Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.
The 6BBs is a structured, systems-based approach for improving
management of patients on long-term opioid therapy that targets six
work areas a primary care practice needs to redesign in order to
improve their clinic's management of patients on long-term opioid
therapy.
Building upon previous work supported by AHRQ to address the opioid
epidemic, this research has the following goals:
1. To improve the guidance for the 6BBs Toolkit,
2. To further implement the 6BBs in primary care practices, and
3. To understand the facilitators and barriers to implementing the
Six Building Blocks to Safer Opioid Management.
This study is being conducted by AHRQ through its contractor, Abt
Associates Inc., pursuant to AHRQ's statutory authority to conduct and
support research on healthcare and on systems for the delivery of such
care, including activities with respect to the quality, effectiveness,
efficiency, appropriateness and value of healthcare services and with
respect to quality measurement and improvement. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1)
and (2).
Method of Collection
To achieve the goals of this project the following data collections
will be implemented:
(1) Clinical Staff Survey. A brief survey will be administered
electronically to all clinical staff, including primary care
physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, social workers,
medical assistants, registered nurses, pharmacists and behavioral
health workers, toward the beginning of 6BBs Toolkit implementation and
approximately 12 months later. A quality improvement (QI) point person
will provide email addresses for the staff who will be invited to
complete the survey from each participating organization. These email
addresses will be used to send clinical staff the surveys at both time
points. The survey will collect information about staff's self-reported
use of evidence-based opioid prescribing practices; procedures in place
around opioid prescribing management; self efficacy regarding safe
opioid prescribing; knowledge, beliefs and attitudes regarding opioid
prescribing; adaptive reserve; self-reported burnout; and reported
implementation experiences. The survey will also collect information
about staffs' background (e.g., clinic role and tenure). The survey
will consist largely of closed-ended questions (e.g., scale or Likert
response options) with several open-ended questions.
(2) Staff Interviews. Interviews will be conducted with 5 staff at
each of the 15 participating health care organizations. AHRQ will
conduct 2 rounds of interviews, with the first round occurring within
several months after the How-To-Guide is distributed to the
organization and the second round occurring 12 months later. The
evaluation team will conduct in-depth interviews with:
a. The quality improvement (QI) lead and
b. Four additional staff who are involved in 6BBs implementation at
each organization, that might include a clinician, information
technology analyst, social worker, behavioral health specialist, and/or
care coordinator.
Staff interviewees will be selected by the QI lead at each
organization, who will be asked to nominate a range of staff from those
who embraced changes to those who were less willing to implement
changes. Interviews will capture qualitative data regarding the
organization's history with efforts to curb opioid prescribing,
experiences using the How-To-Guide, implementation of the 6BB
intervention and associated opioid management interventions, and
lessons learned that can be shared with other health care
organizations.
(3) Virtual Launch Meeting. A virtual launch meeting will be held
for organization liaisons and quality improvement leaders from
participating health care organizations to launch 6BBs Toolkit
implementation. The meeting will be conducted by web-conference, and
will last up to 2 hours.
(4) Quarterly Check-In Calls. A project team member will hold a
quarterly check-in call with organization liaisons and quality
improvement leaders to assess the progress of implementation of the
6BBs intervention and improvement initiatives at each organization.
Check-in calls will occur quarterly for up to 12 months. Each call will
be up to 60 minutes in duration, and notes will be taken by an
evaluation team member during each call.
(5) QI Measures. Each health care organization will be asked to
report quarterly on the number of patients on long-term opioid therapy
and the proportion of those who are on greater than 90 morphine
milligram equivalents, co-prescribed a benzodiazepine, and had the
prescription drug monitoring program checked and a urine drug screen.
Organizations may also select other outcome measures aligned to their
own goals.
(6) Other outcome and output data from administrative records,
electronic medical records, and organizational documents (Secondary
Data). Health care organizations may also report their progress on
implementing the 6BB intervention and associated changes in care
processes through completion of worksheets contained in or associated
with the How-To-Guide. Since these data collections involve simply
submitting worksheets they complete for their own benefit while working
through the How-To-Guide, they pose only minimal data collection burden
to the health care organization, specifically the person who completes
the worksheets (i.e., QI lead). The project team will also obtain
relevant organizational documents (e.g., opioid prescribing policies,
quality improvement plans, sample patient agreements, relevant practice
workflows, screen shots of data dashboards).
The purpose of the proposed data collection effort is to obtain
information needed to modify and enhance the 6BB How-To-Guide and to
provide information to health care organizations considering using the
How-To-Guide to improve their opioid prescribing
[[Page 36605]]
practices and relevant outcomes. Since this is only a study conducted
in 15 organizations, outcomes or impacts will not be generalizable.
The data collected will help the project team: (1) Understand the
facilitators and barriers of using the 6BB Toolkit and recommended
improvements to processes of care and opioid prescribing practices, and
(2) assess the effectiveness of using the 6BB Toolkit to improve
processes of care and opioid prescribing practices. The data collection
effort may also provide insights that could guide dissemination of the
Toolkit. For example, if it was found that a specific type of
organization included in this pilot study (e.g., small, stand-alone
clinic in a rural area) particularly benefitted from using the Toolkit,
then AHRQ could tailor and target its dissemination of the Toolkit to
similar organizations. Once revisions are made based on results of this
evaluation, the How-To-Guide corresponding to the Toolkit will be
published on AHRQ's website. A manuscript describing the pilot study
and its results will also be produced for publication in a peer-
reviewed journal.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 presents estimates of the reporting burden hours for the
data collection efforts. Time estimates are based on prior experiences
and what can reasonably be requested of participating health care
organizations. The number of respondents listed in column A, Exhibit 1
reflects a projected 75% response rate for data collection efforts 2a
and 2b below. 1. Clinical Staff Survey. A brief survey will be emailed
to all clinicians both toward the beginning of 6BBs Toolkit
implementation and approximately 12 months later. We assumed 20
clinical staff per clinical site, and approximately 50 clinical sites
overall (with a range from 1 clinic to 17 per organization), for a
total of 1,000 staff across all 15 organizations. We assumed 750
clinical staff will complete the survey based on a 75% response rate.
It is expected to take up to 15 minutes to complete.
2. Staff Interviews. In-depth interviews will occur with 5 staff at
each health care organization, for a total of up to 75 individuals. The
evaluation team will conduct these interviews, each lasting up to 1
hour, at 2 points in time with:
a. One QI lead per organization (toward the start of and at the end
of the project).
b. Four additional staff (e.g., clinician, information technology
analyst, social worker) per organization (midway through and at the end
of the project).
3. Virtual Launch Meeting. The meeting will occur with the quality
improvement (QI) leads at participating health care organizations to
launch 6BBs Toolkit implementation. The meeting will be conducted by
web-conference, and will last up to 2 hours.
4. Quarterly Check-In Calls. Calls will occur with QI leads,
clinical champions, and other relevant staff the QI lead identifies,
for a total of no more than 5 individuals per organization. These calls
will assess progress with the organization's use of the Toolkit and
implementation of associated practice changes, and will occur quarterly
over 15 months, for a total of 5 quarterly check-in calls. Each call
will take up to 60 minutes.
5. QI Measures. Aggregate reports of the specified quality measures
will be provided on a quarterly basis over the course of an 18-month
period by a data analyst at each organization, for a total of 15
individuals across all 15 organizations. We assume 40 hours total (10
hours per quarter) for each data analyst to collect and provide these
data.
6. Other outcome and output data from administrative records and
organizational documents (Secondary Data). These secondary data will be
provided by the QI lead at each organization, for a total of 15
individuals across all 15 organizations. We assume 4 hours per month
for 12 months for a total of 48 hours for each QI lead to collect and
provide these data.
Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Data collection method or project activity Number of responses per Hours per Total burden
respondents respondent response hours
A. B. C. D.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Clinical Staff Survey *...................... 750 2 15/60 375
2a. Staff Interview--QI Lead.................... 15 2 1 30
2b. Staff Interview--Additional Staff........... 60 2 1 120
3. Virtual Launch Meeting....................... 15 1 2 30
4. Quarterly Check-In Calls..................... 75 5 1 375
5. QI Measures.................................. 15 4 10 600
6. Secondary data............................... 15 12 4 720
-----------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Number of respondents (Column A) reflects a sample size assuming a 75% response rate for this data collection
effort.
Exhibit 2, below, presents the estimated annualized cost burden
associated with the respondents' time to participate in this research.
The total cost burden is estimated to be about $91,623.
Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Total burden Average hourly Total cost
Data collection method or project activity respondents hours wage rate * burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Clinical Staff Survey........................ 750 375 $48.45 $18,169
2a. Staff Interview--QI Lead.................... 15 30 53.69 1,611
2b. Staff Interview--Additional Staff........... 60 120 38.83 4,660
3. Virtual Launch Meeting....................... 15 30 53.69 1,611
4. Quarterly Check-In Calls..................... 75 375 38.83 14,561
[[Page 36606]]
5. QI Measures.................................. 15 600 20.59 12,354
6. Secondary data............................... 15 720 53.69 38,657
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. .............. .............. 91,623
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The average hourly rate of $48.45 for the clinical staff survey was
calculated based on the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for health
diagnosing and treating practitioners, $48.45 (occupation code 29-
1000).
The average hourly rate of $53.69 for QI lead interviews was
calculated based on the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for medical and
health services managers, $53.69 (occupation code 11-9111). The average
hourly rate of $38.83 for staff interviews was calculated based on the
2017 mean hourly wage rate for healthcare practitioners and technical
occupations, $38.83 (occupation code 29-0000).
The average hourly rate of $53.69 for the virtual launch meeting
was calculated based on the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for medical and
health services managers, $53.69 (occupation code 11-9111).
The average hourly wage rate of $38.83 for quarterly check-in calls
was calculated based on the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for healthcare
practitioners and technical occupations, $38.83 (occupation code 29-
0000).
The average hourly rate of $20.59 for QI measures was calculated
based on the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for medical records and health
information technicians, $20.59 (occupation code 29-2071).
The average hourly rate of $53.69 for secondary data was calculated
based on the 2017 mean hourly wage rate for medical and health services
managers, $53.69 (occupation code 11-9111).
Mean hourly wage rates for these groups of occupations were
obtained from the Bureau of Labor & Statistics on ``Occupational
Employment and Wages, May 2017'' found at the following URL: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#b29-0000.htm.
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ's
information collection are requested with regard to any of the
following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ's health care research and
health care information dissemination functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's
estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: July 23, 2019.
Virginia L. Mackay-Smith,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2019-15986 Filed 7-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
