Tribal Transportation Program; Inventory of Proposed Roads, 36040-36043 [2019-15928]
Download as PDF
36040
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Proposed Rules
information has previously been made
available to others without obligation
concerning its confidentiality, (5) an
explanation of the competitive injury to
the submitting person which would
result from public disclosure, (6) when
such information might lose its
confidential character due to the
passage of time, and (7) why disclosure
of the information would be contrary to
the public interest.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
DOE considers public participation to
be a very important part of the process
for developing test procedures and
energy conservation standards. DOE
actively encourages the participation
and interaction of the public during the
comment period in each stage of the
rulemaking process. Interactions with
and between members of the public
provide a balanced discussion of the
issues and assist DOE in the rulemaking
process. Anyone who wishes to be
added to the DOE mailing list to receive
future notices and information about
this process should contact Appliance
and Equipment Standards Program staff
at (202) 287–1445 or via email at
Process.Rule@ee.doe.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 22,
2019.
Daniel R. Simmons,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2019–15916 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 120, 121, 122, 123, 124,
125, 126, 127, 128, 129 and 130
[Public Notice: 10799]
RIN 1400–AE29
Consolidation of Exemptions in the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations
Department of State.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: As part of an ongoing effort to
better organize the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR), the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC) seeks public comment on
consolidating and clarifying the various
exemptions located throughout the
regulations. DDTC does not seek input
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
on whether individual exemptions in
the ITAR should be expanded or
eliminated, but rather requests
comments regarding: Which
exemptions, if any, are redundant or
could be consolidated; and which
exemptions, if any, contain language
that introduces significant ambiguity or
hinders the exemption’s intended use.
DATES: The Department of State will
accept comments in response to this
notice until August 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments by one of the
following methods:
• Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov with the subject line, ‘‘Request
for Comments Regarding Consolidation
of ITAR Exemptions.’’
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov,
search for this notice using its docket
number, DOS–2019–0022.
Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov will be visible to
other members of the public; the
Department will publish responsive
comments on the DDTC website
(www.pmddtc.state.gov). Therefore,
commenters are cautioned not to
include proprietary or other sensitive
information in their comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Foster, Regulatory and Multilateral
Affairs, Office of Defense Trade Controls
Policy, Department of State, telephone
(202) 663–2811 email
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Consolidation of ITAR Exemptions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC) of the Department of State
regulates the export and temporary
import of defense articles and services
under the Arms Export Control Act
(AECA) and its implementing
regulations, the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts
120–130). DDTC is engaged in an
ongoing effort to organize the ITAR
more effectively in order to further
streamline and clarify the subchapter.
As part of that effort, DDTC seeks public
comment on various exemptions located
throughout the ITAR. Exemptions
authorize the export, reexport,
retransfer, temporary import, or
brokering of a specific defense article or
defense service without a license (as
defined in the ITAR) or other written
authorization.
DDTC does not seek to broaden or
eliminate (unless determined to be
redundant) existing exemptions in a
rulemaking on this issue. Instead, its
goal is to consolidate the various
exemptions located throughout the
ITAR in a single location and to
organize them more effectively. All
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
commenters are encouraged to provide
comments that are responsive
specifically to the prompts set forth
below.
The Department requests comment on
the topics below. Excluding the
exemptions currently located in Part
126 of the ITAR:
1. Which exemptions, if any, are
redundant or could be consolidated?
2. Which exemptions, if any, contain
language that introduces significant
ambiguity or hinders the exemption’s
intended use?
If the Department issues a notice of
proposed rulemaking on this topic, it
will address responsive comments at
that time.
R. Clarke Cooper,
Assistant Secretary, Political-Military Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2019–15540 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 170
[190D0102
DRDS5A300000DR.5A311.IA000118]
RIN 1076–AF45
Tribal Transportation Program;
Inventory of Proposed Roads
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) is proposing a change to a
provision in the Tribal Transportation
Program regulations affecting proposed
roads that are currently in the National
Tribal Transportation Facility Inventory
(NTTFI). Specifically, this proposed rule
would delete the requirement for Tribes
to collect and submit certain data in
order to keep those proposed roads in
the NTTFI. The requirement to collect
and submit data to add new proposed
roads to the NTTFI would remain in
place.
DATES: Comments are due by September
24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by number 1076–AF45, by
any of the following methods:
—Federal rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for sending comments.
—Email: comments@bia.gov. Include
the number 1076–AF45 in the subject
line of the message.
—Mail or hand-delivery: Elizabeth
Appel, Office of Regulatory Affairs &
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
36041
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Collaborative Action, U.S. Department
of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW,
MIB–4660–MS, Washington, DC
20240. Include the number 1076–
AF45 in the subject line of the
message.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include ‘‘Bureau of Indian Affairs’’
and ‘‘1076–AF45.’’ All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. We cannot ensure
that comments received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES) will
be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Comments on the information
collections contained in this proposed
regulation (see ‘‘Paperwork Reduction
Act’’ section, below) are separate from
those on the substance of the rule. Send
comments on the information collection
burden to OMB by facsimile to (202)
395–5806 or email to the OMB Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Interior at OIRA_DOCKET@
omb.eop.gov. Please send a copy of your
comments to the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice.
Mr.
LeRoy Gishi, Division of Transportation,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Summary of Rule
II. Tribal Consultation
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866, 13563, and 13771)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
L. Clarity of This Regulation
M. Public Availability of Comments
I. Summary of Rule
Regulations governing the Tribal
Transportation Program were published
in 2016. See 81 FR 78456 (November 7,
2016). The regulations became effective
on December 7, 2016, except for
§ 170.443, which required Tribes’
compliance one year later: On
November 7, 2017. Section 170.443
required Tribes to collect data for
proposed roads to be added to, or
remain in, the NTTFI. BIA then further
delayed the November 7, 2017, deadline
for compliance with § 170.443 to
November 7, 2019. See 82 FR 50312
(October 31, 2017), 83 FR 8609
(February 28, 2018). The purpose of the
delay was to provide BIA with time to
reexamine whether revision or deletion
of the data collection requirements in
§ 170.443 would be appropriate. Since
that time, BIA staff have engaged in
outreach at several regional and national
meetings with affected Tribes. BIA is
now proposing to apply the data
collection requirements going forward
to any new proposed road submission,
but not to proposed roads that were
already in the NTTFI as of the date of
publication of the regulations on
November 7, 2016, unless any changes
or updates were or are made after that
date. BIA is making this proposal
because Tribes added the proposed
roads to the NTTFI under the rules that
were in effect at the time, which did not
require the significant data collection.
Moving forward, however, BIA would
require that new proposed roads include
the back-up documentation identified
by § 170.443 (a)(1)–(8) in order to be
added to the NTTFI.
II. Tribal Consultation
We will be hosting the following
Tribal consultation sessions at targeted
locations throughout the country to
discuss this proposed rule. The dates
and locations for the consultation
sessions are as follows:
Date
Time
September 5, 2019 .............................................................
September 10, 2019 ...........................................................
September 12, 2019 ...........................................................
9:00 a.m.–12:00 (Local time) .............................................
9:00 a.m.–12:00 (Local time) .............................................
9:00 a.m.–12:00 (Local time) .............................................
Please check the BIA’s Consultations
website, https://www.bia.gov/as-ia/
consultations, for the most current
consultation information.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866, 13563, and 13771)
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Office of Indian Services, Bureau of
Indian Affairs, (202) 513–7711,
leroy.gishi@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. The
E.O. directs agencies to consider
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements. This rule is also
part of the Department’s commitment
under the Executive Order to reduce the
number and burden of regulations.
E.O. 13771 of January 30, 2017,
directs Federal agencies to reduce the
regulatory burden on regulated entities
and control regulatory costs. E.O. 13771,
however, applies only to significant
regulatory actions, as defined in Section
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Location
Minneapolis, MN.
Anchorage, AK.
Denver, CO.
3(f) of E.O. 12866. Therefore, E.O. 13771
does not apply to this proposed rule.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more
because it merely codifies eligibility
requirements that were already
established by past practice and a
Federal District Court ruling.
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
36042
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions because this rule
affects only individuals’ eligibility for
certain education contracts.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
because this rule affects agreements
between Tribes and the Department to
allow Tribes to authorize individual
leases, business agreements, and rightsof-way on Tribal land.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a monetarily
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630 because this rule does not
affect individual property rights
protected by the Fifth Amendment or
involve a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement because the rule affects only
agreements entered into by Tribes and
the Department. A federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the
criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate
errors and ambiguity and be written to
minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that
all regulations be written in clear
language and contain clear legal
standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and Tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and have determined that it has
substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian Tribes because the
rule affects what proposed roads will
remain on the inventory of Tribal
transportation facilities. The
Department is hosting consultation
sessions with Tribes (see ‘‘II. Tribal
Consultation’’ above) and will be
individually notifying each federally
recognized Tribe of these opportunities
to consult.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB Control No. 1076–0161
currently authorizes the collections of
information contained in 25 CFR part
170, with an expiration of September
30, 2019. The current authorization
totaling an estimated 23,446 annual
burden hours. If this proposed rule is
finalized, the annual burden hours will
decrease by an estimated 2,520 hours.
This decrease is due to the elimination
of the requirement for Tribes to provide
information on proposed roads that are
already included on the inventory. This
change would require a revision to an
approved information collection under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. for which the
Department is requesting OMB
approval.
OMB Control Number: 1076–0161.
Title: Tribal Transportation Program,
25 CFR 170.
Brief Description of Collection: The
information submitted by Tribes allows
them to participate in planning the
development of transportation needs in
their area; the information provides data
for administration, documenting plans,
and for oversight of the program by the
Department. Some of the information
such as the providing inventory updates
(25 CFR 170.444), the development of a
long range transportation plan (25 CFR
170.411 and 170.412), the development
of a Tribal transportation improvement
program (25 CFR 170.421), and annual
report (25 CFR 170.420) are mandatory
to determine how funds will allocated
to implement the Tribal Transportation
Program. Some of the information, such
as public hearing requirements, is
necessary for public notification and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
involvement (25 CFR 170.437 and
170.438), while other information, such
as a request for exception from design
standards (25 CFR 170.456), is
voluntary. The revision accounts for
updates made to § 170.443, removing
the requirement to provide information
for proposed roads that existed in the
inventory as of November 7, 2016.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Federally recognized
Indian Tribes.
Number of Respondents: 281 on
average (each year).
Number of Responses: 1,504 on
average (each year).
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
from 0.5 hours to 40 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
20,928 hours.
OMB Control No. 1076–0161
currently authorizes the collections of
information contained in 25 CFR part
170. If this proposed rule is finalized,
the annual burden hours for
respondents will decrease by
approximately 2,520 hours because
Tribes will no longer be required to
provide information that they would
have been required to submit under the
current estimates.
The recordkeeping requirements
contained in section 170.472 are
authorized under OMB Control No.
1076–0136, applicable to selfdetermination and self-governance
contracts and compacts under 25 CFR
900 and 1000.
Please note that an agency may not
sponsor or request, and an individual
need not respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a valid
OMB Control Number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because this is
an administrative and procedural
regulation. (For further information see
43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also
determined that the rule does not
involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Proposed Rules
L. Clarity of this Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1(b)(12)), and 12988
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section
1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and,
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that are unclearly
written, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you believe
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 170
Highways and roads, Indians-lands.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
proposes to amend 25 CFR part 170 as
follows:
PART 170—TRIBAL TRANSPORATION
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 170
continues to read as follows:
Pub. L. 112–141, Pub. L. 114–94; 5
U.S.C. 2; 23 U.S.C. 201, 202; 25 U.S.C.
2, 9.
■ 2. In § 170.443, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
§ 170.443 What is required to successfully
include a proposed transportation facility in
the NTTFI?
(a) * * *
(b) For those proposed roads that were
included in the NTTFI as of November
7, 2016, the information in paragraphs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
(a)(1) through (a)(8) of this section may
be submitted for approval to BIA and
FHWA at any time, but is not required
in order for those proposed roads to
remain in the NTTFI, unless any
changes or updates to the proposed road
were (or are) made after that date.
I. Table of Abbreviations
Dated: July 3, 2019.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs.
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On May 1, 2019, the United States
Navy (USN) notified the Coast Guard
that it would be towing the USS LA
JOLLA into Charleston Harbor, to the
vessel’s new berth at Joint Base
Charleston, as a Moored Training Ship
for the USN’s Nuclear Power Training
Unit on September 3, 2019. The Captain
of the Port Charleston (COTP) has
determined a 200-yard safety zone is
required for the safe transit of the
towing vessel and USS LA JOLLA.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 200-yard
radius of the towing vessel and USS LA
JOLLA during their transit to Joint Base
Charleston on the Cooper River. The
Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
[FR Doc. 2019–15928 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0565]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Charleston Harbor,
Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
M. Public Availability of Comments
36043
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary moving safety
zone around the USS LA JOLLA as the
vessel is towed to Joint Base Charleston,
Charleston, SC. This action is necessary
to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters in Charleston Harbor,
Charleston, SC on September 3, 2019.
This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from being
in the safety zone unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2019–0565 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Chad Ray, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
Chad.L.Ray@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
temporary moving safety zone around
the USS LA JOLLA on September 3,
2019 from 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. The
safety zone would cover all navigable
waters within 200 yards of the USS LA
JOLLA and towing vessel. The duration
of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of the towing vessel and the USS
LA JOLLA during their transit to Joint
Base Charleston on the Cooper River. No
vessel or person would be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 144 (Friday, July 26, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36040-36043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15928]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 170
[190D0102 DRDS5A300000DR.5A311.IA000118]
RIN 1076-AF45
Tribal Transportation Program; Inventory of Proposed Roads
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is proposing a change to a
provision in the Tribal Transportation Program regulations affecting
proposed roads that are currently in the National Tribal Transportation
Facility Inventory (NTTFI). Specifically, this proposed rule would
delete the requirement for Tribes to collect and submit certain data in
order to keep those proposed roads in the NTTFI. The requirement to
collect and submit data to add new proposed roads to the NTTFI would
remain in place.
DATES: Comments are due by September 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by number 1076-AF45, by
any of the following methods:
--Federal rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for sending comments.
--Email: [email protected]. Include the number 1076-AF45 in the subject
line of the message.
--Mail or hand-delivery: Elizabeth Appel, Office of Regulatory Affairs
&
[[Page 36041]]
Collaborative Action, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street
NW, MIB-4660-MS, Washington, DC 20240. Include the number 1076-AF45 in
the subject line of the message.
Instructions: All submissions received must include ``Bureau of
Indian Affairs'' and ``1076-AF45.'' All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. We cannot ensure
that comments received after the close of the comment period (see
DATES) will be included in the docket for this rulemaking and
considered.
Comments on the information collections contained in this proposed
regulation (see ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' section, below) are
separate from those on the substance of the rule. Send comments on the
information collection burden to OMB by facsimile to (202) 395-5806 or
email to the OMB Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at
[email protected]. Please send a copy of your comments to the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. LeRoy Gishi, Division of
Transportation, Office of Indian Services, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
(202) 513-7711, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of Rule
II. Tribal Consultation
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866, 13563, and 13771)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
L. Clarity of This Regulation
M. Public Availability of Comments
I. Summary of Rule
Regulations governing the Tribal Transportation Program were
published in 2016. See 81 FR 78456 (November 7, 2016). The regulations
became effective on December 7, 2016, except for Sec. 170.443, which
required Tribes' compliance one year later: On November 7, 2017.
Section 170.443 required Tribes to collect data for proposed roads to
be added to, or remain in, the NTTFI. BIA then further delayed the
November 7, 2017, deadline for compliance with Sec. 170.443 to
November 7, 2019. See 82 FR 50312 (October 31, 2017), 83 FR 8609
(February 28, 2018). The purpose of the delay was to provide BIA with
time to reexamine whether revision or deletion of the data collection
requirements in Sec. 170.443 would be appropriate. Since that time,
BIA staff have engaged in outreach at several regional and national
meetings with affected Tribes. BIA is now proposing to apply the data
collection requirements going forward to any new proposed road
submission, but not to proposed roads that were already in the NTTFI as
of the date of publication of the regulations on November 7, 2016,
unless any changes or updates were or are made after that date. BIA is
making this proposal because Tribes added the proposed roads to the
NTTFI under the rules that were in effect at the time, which did not
require the significant data collection. Moving forward, however, BIA
would require that new proposed roads include the back-up documentation
identified by Sec. 170.443 (a)(1)-(8) in order to be added to the
NTTFI.
II. Tribal Consultation
We will be hosting the following Tribal consultation sessions at
targeted locations throughout the country to discuss this proposed
rule. The dates and locations for the consultation sessions are as
follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Time Location
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 5, 2019....................... 9:00 a.m.-12:00 (Local Minneapolis, MN.
time).
September 10, 2019...................... 9:00 a.m.-12:00 (Local Anchorage, AK.
time).
September 12, 2019...................... 9:00 a.m.-12:00 (Local Denver, CO.
time).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check the BIA's Consultations website, https://www.bia.gov/as-ia/consultations, for the most current consultation information.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866, 13563, and 13771)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The E.O. directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of
ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these
requirements. This rule is also part of the Department's commitment
under the Executive Order to reduce the number and burden of
regulations.
E.O. 13771 of January 30, 2017, directs Federal agencies to reduce
the regulatory burden on regulated entities and control regulatory
costs. E.O. 13771, however, applies only to significant regulatory
actions, as defined in Section 3(f) of E.O. 12866. Therefore, E.O.
13771 does not apply to this proposed rule.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more because it merely codifies eligibility requirements that were
already established by past practice and a Federal District Court
ruling.
[[Page 36042]]
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions because this rule affects only
individuals' eligibility for certain education contracts.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises
because this rule affects agreements between Tribes and the Department
to allow Tribes to authorize individual leases, business agreements,
and rights-of-way on Tribal land.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a monetarily significant or unique effect
on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 because this rule
does not affect individual property rights protected by the Fifth
Amendment or involve a compensable ``taking.'' A takings implication
assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement because the rule
affects only agreements entered into by Tribes and the Department. A
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Indian Tribes because the rule
affects what proposed roads will remain on the inventory of Tribal
transportation facilities. The Department is hosting consultation
sessions with Tribes (see ``II. Tribal Consultation'' above) and will
be individually notifying each federally recognized Tribe of these
opportunities to consult.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB Control No. 1076-0161 currently authorizes the collections of
information contained in 25 CFR part 170, with an expiration of
September 30, 2019. The current authorization totaling an estimated
23,446 annual burden hours. If this proposed rule is finalized, the
annual burden hours will decrease by an estimated 2,520 hours. This
decrease is due to the elimination of the requirement for Tribes to
provide information on proposed roads that are already included on the
inventory. This change would require a revision to an approved
information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. for which the Department is requesting OMB
approval.
OMB Control Number: 1076-0161.
Title: Tribal Transportation Program, 25 CFR 170.
Brief Description of Collection: The information submitted by
Tribes allows them to participate in planning the development of
transportation needs in their area; the information provides data for
administration, documenting plans, and for oversight of the program by
the Department. Some of the information such as the providing inventory
updates (25 CFR 170.444), the development of a long range
transportation plan (25 CFR 170.411 and 170.412), the development of a
Tribal transportation improvement program (25 CFR 170.421), and annual
report (25 CFR 170.420) are mandatory to determine how funds will
allocated to implement the Tribal Transportation Program. Some of the
information, such as public hearing requirements, is necessary for
public notification and involvement (25 CFR 170.437 and 170.438), while
other information, such as a request for exception from design
standards (25 CFR 170.456), is voluntary. The revision accounts for
updates made to Sec. 170.443, removing the requirement to provide
information for proposed roads that existed in the inventory as of
November 7, 2016.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Federally recognized Indian Tribes.
Number of Respondents: 281 on average (each year).
Number of Responses: 1,504 on average (each year).
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies from 0.5 hours to 40 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 20,928 hours.
OMB Control No. 1076-0161 currently authorizes the collections of
information contained in 25 CFR part 170. If this proposed rule is
finalized, the annual burden hours for respondents will decrease by
approximately 2,520 hours because Tribes will no longer be required to
provide information that they would have been required to submit under
the current estimates.
The recordkeeping requirements contained in section 170.472 are
authorized under OMB Control No. 1076-0136, applicable to self-
determination and self-governance contracts and compacts under 25 CFR
900 and 1000.
Please note that an agency may not sponsor or request, and an
individual need not respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB Control Number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because this is an administrative and procedural regulation.
(For further information see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also determined
that the rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances
listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
[[Page 36043]]
L. Clarity of this Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)), and
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and,
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences
are too long, the sections where you believe lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
M. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 170
Highways and roads, Indians-lands.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, proposes to amend 25 CFR part 170
as follows:
PART 170--TRIBAL TRANSPORATION PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 170 continues to read as follows:
Pub. L. 112-141, Pub. L. 114-94; 5 U.S.C. 2; 23 U.S.C. 201, 202; 25
U.S.C. 2, 9.
0
2. In Sec. 170.443, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 170.443 What is required to successfully include a proposed
transportation facility in the NTTFI?
(a) * * *
(b) For those proposed roads that were included in the NTTFI as of
November 7, 2016, the information in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(8)
of this section may be submitted for approval to BIA and FHWA at any
time, but is not required in order for those proposed roads to remain
in the NTTFI, unless any changes or updates to the proposed road were
(or are) made after that date.
Dated: July 3, 2019.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019-15928 Filed 7-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P