Lactic Acid; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 35996-36000 [2019-15647]
Download as PDF
35996
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Environmental
Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting two hours that will prohibit
entry on the Missouri River between
MM 28.2 and MM 28.8. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(d) in Table
3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures
5090.1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/
or actual notice.
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
S.A. Stoermer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Upper Mississippi River.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
[FR Doc. 2019–15851 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–0851; FRL–9996–21–
OAR]
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
RIN 2060–AU27
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Standards of Performance for
Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0581 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0581 Safety Zone; Missouri
River, Miles 28.2 to 28.8, St. Charles, MO.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Missouri River between Mile Marker
(MM) 28.2 and MM 28.8.
(b) Period of enforcement. This
section will be enforced from 8:30 p.m.
through 10:30 p.m. on August 31, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Upper Mississippi River
(COTP) or a designated representative.
A designated representative is a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to
units under the operational control of
USCG Sector Upper Mississippi River.
(2) Persons or vessels desiring to enter
into or pass through the zone must
request permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. They may be
contacted by telephone at 314–269–
2332.
(3) If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels shall comply with
the instructions of the COTP or
designated representative.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public of the
enforcement date and times for this
safety zone, as well as any emergent
safety concerns that may delay the
enforcement of the zone through
Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM),
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Correction
In rule document 2019–14372,
appearing on pages 32084 through
32088, in the issue of Friday, July 5,
2019 make the following corrections:
1. On page 32084, in the document
heading, ‘‘FRL–9992–21–OAR’’ should
read ‘‘FRL–9996–21–OAR’’.
2. On page 32088, in the second
column, in the final paragraph, on the
final line, ‘‘p.m.’’ should read ‘‘PM’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2019–14372 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1300–01–D
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0157; FRL–9994–63]
Lactic Acid; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of lactic acid
(CAS Reg. No. 50–21–5) when used as
an inert ingredient (acidifier) on foodcontact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy processing equipment, foodprocessing equipment and utensils at
10,000 parts per million (ppm). Ecolab
Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment
of an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance. This regulation eliminates
the need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of lactic
acid when used in accordance with the
terms specified in the regulation.
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
This regulation is effective July
26, 2019. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 24, 2019, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0157, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. General Information
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2018–0157 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before September 24, 2019. Addresses
for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2018–0157, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of May 18,
2018 (83 FR 23247) (FRL–9976–87),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP IN–11113) by Ecolab Inc.,
655 Lone Oak Drive, Eagan, MN 55121.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.940(a) be amended by establishing
an exemption from the requirement of a
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35997
tolerance for residues of lactic acid
(CAS Reg. No. 50–21–5) when used as
an inert ingredient (acidifier) in
pesticide formulations applied to foodcontact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy processing equipment, foodprocessing equipment and utensils at
10,000 parts per million (ppm). That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by Ecolab Inc., the
petitioner, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(c)(2)(B) requires EPA, in
determining whether an exemption
would be safe, to take into account the
considerations set forth in
subparagraphs (b)(2)(C) and (D). Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
35998
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
appreciable risks to human health. In
order to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the
toxicity of the inert in conjunction with
possible exposure to residues of the
inert ingredient through food, drinking
water, and through other exposures that
occur as a result of pesticide use in
residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not
necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be
established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for lactic acid
including exposure resulting from the
exemption established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with lactic acid follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as
well as the relationship of the results of
the studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by lactic acid as well as the noobserved-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL)
and the lowest-observed-adverse-effectlevel (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies
are discussed in this unit.
Lactic acid is practically non-toxic to
mammals, apart from irritation
stemming from its low pH. It is an
endogenous compound produced in the
mammalian system. L-lactic acid
(lactate) is a product of fermentation in
the muscles produced from pyruvate via
lactate dehydrogenase. Lactate is also
generated from glucose under aerobic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
conditions in some tissues and cell
types. L-Lactic acid is normally found in
the blood and interstitial fluid of
humans at a level of 10 mg/dL (EPA
2009). In addition, L-lactic acid occurs
naturally in several foods, primarily
found in fermented milk products such
as sour milk, cheese, buttermilk and
yogurt. It also occurs naturally in meats,
fruits, tomato juice, beer, wine,
molasses, blood and muscles of animals,
and in the soil.
The available acute toxicity studies
indicate that lactic acid is not acutely
toxic via the oral or inhalation route of
exposure. Because the test substance
(80% lactic acid) has a very low pH
(<1), L-lactic acid is a severe dermal
irritant in rabbits but not a skin
sensitizer at high concentrations (e.g.,
80%).
Although some minor effects were
observed in repeat dosing studies in rats
(e.g., decrease in body weight gain or
organ weight gain), no significant
systemic toxicity was identified for
lactic acid, even at dose levels greater
than 1,000 mg/kg/day. In addition, there
was no indication of developmental
toxicity in a developmental toxicity
study in mice. Furthermore, none of the
available data indicate that lactic acid is
neurotoxic, immunotoxic, or
carcinogenic.
Based on a review of 15 mutagenicity
and clastogenicity studies on lactic acid
and the ammonium, calcium, and
sodium salts of lactic acid, EPA notes
that the results were negative for all
studies and there is no evidence that
lactic acid is genotoxic.
In an in vitro chromosomal aberration
study, some pseudo-positive reactions
were observed at low pH.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
Although the toxicity database for
lactic acid is limited, the toxicity profile
indicates no significant systemic
toxicity even at high dose levels. Since
no toxicity is observed, an endpoint of
concern for risk assessment purposes
was not identified.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to lactic acid, EPA considered
exposure under the proposed exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance.
EPA assessed dietary exposures from
lactic acid in food as follows:
Dietary exposure to lactic acid may
occur following ingestion of foods
containing residues of lactic acid from
its use as an acidifier in pesticide
formulations applied to food-contact
surfaces as well as from other pesticidal
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
uses that are already approved that may
result in residues o treated crops. In
addition, lactic acid occurs naturally in
several foods and in the soil. However,
a quantitative dietary exposure
assessment was not conducted since a
toxicological endpoint for risk
assessment was not identified.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. Since a hazard endpoint of
concern was not identified for the acute
and chronic dietary assessment, a
quantitative dietary exposure risk
assessment for drinking water was not
conducted, although exposures may be
expected from use on food crops.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers),
carpets, swimming pools, and hard
surface disinfection on walls, floors,
tables).
Lactic acid may be used in pesticide
products and non-pesticide products
that may be used in and around the
home. Based on the lack of a hazard
endpoint of concern above, a
quantitative residential exposure
assessment for lactic acid was not
conducted.
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found lactic acid to share
a common mechanism of toxicity with
any other substances, and lactic acid
does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other
substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
assumed that lactic acid does not have
a common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Based on the lack of threshold effects,
EPA has not identified any toxicological
endpoints of concern and is conducting
a qualitative assessment of lactic acid.
That qualitative assessment does not use
safety factors for assessing risk, and no
additional safety factor is needed for
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
35999
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
assessing risk to infants and children.
Based on an assessment of lactic acid,
EPA has concluded that there are no
toxicological endpoints of concern for
the U.S. population, including infants
and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
Because no toxicological endpoints of
concern were identified, EPA concludes
that aggregate exposure to residues of
lactic acid will not pose a risk to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, and that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, or to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to
lactic acid residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
under 40 CFR 180.940(a) for lactic acid
(CAS Reg. No. 50–21–5) when used as
an inert ingredient (acidifier) in
pesticide formulations applied to foodcontact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy processing equipment, foodprocessing equipment and utensils at
10,000 ppm.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Pesticide chemical
CAS Reg. No.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
*
Lactic acid ......................
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
*
50–21–5
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 5, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.940, add alphabetically the
inert ingredient ‘‘lactic acid’’ to the table
in paragraph (a) and remove the inert
ingredient ‘‘lactic acid’’ from the table
in paragraph (c).
The addition reads as follows:
■
§ 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active
and inert ingredients for use in
antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact
surface sanitizing solutions).
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
When ready for use, the end-use concentration is not to exceed 10,000 ppm in antimicrobial formulations applied to food-contact surfaces in public eating places.
*
Jkt 247001
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Limits
*
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
PO 00000
*
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
*
26JYR1
*
36000
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–15647 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 282
[EPA–R10–UST–2019–0191; 9996–69–
Region 10]
Oregon: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions, Codification and
Incorporation by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the State
of Oregon’s Underground Storage Tank
(UST) program submitted by the State.
The EPA has determined that these
revisions satisfy all requirements
needed for program approval. This
action also codifies the EPA’s approval
of Oregon’s State program and
incorporates by reference those
provisions of the State’s regulations that
we have determined meet the
requirements for approval. The State’s
federally-authorized and codified UST
program, as revised pursuant to this
action, will remain subject to the EPA’s
inspection and enforcement authorities
under Sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA
Subtitle I and other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
DATES: This rule is effective September
24, 2019, unless the EPA receives
adverse comment by August 26, 2019. If
EPA receives adverse comment, it will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. The
incorporation by reference of certain
material listed in the regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register, as of September 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: wilder.scott@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Scott Wilder, Region 10,
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
Division, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 155, MS: OCE–201,
Seattle, WA 98101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Scott Wilder, Region
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
10, Enforcement and Compliance
Assurance Division, EPA Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle,
WA 98101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R10–UST–2019–
0191. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or email. The
Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, then your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, then the
EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties, and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA
may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
You can view and copy the
documents that form the basis for this
action and associated publicly available
materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday at the following
location: EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101,
phone number (206) 553–6693.
Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 2
days in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Wilder, (206) 553–6693,
wilder.scott@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Scott Wilder at (206)
553–6693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Approval of Revisions to Oregon’s
Underground Storage Tank Program
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States which have received final
approval from the EPA under RCRA
Section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that
is equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the Federal
underground storage tank program.
When the EPA makes revisions to the
regulations that govern the UST
program, states must revise their
programs to comply with the updated
regulations and submit these revisions
to the EPA for approval. Most
commonly, states must change their
programs because of changes to the
EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 280. States can
also initiate changes on their own to
their underground storage tank program
and these changes must then be
approved by the EPA.
B. What decisions has the EPA made in
this rule?
On October 19, 2018, in accordance
with 40 CFR 281.51(a), Oregon
submitted a complete program revision
application seeking the EPA approval
for its UST program revisions (State
Application). Oregon’s revisions
correspond to the EPA final rule
published on July 15, 2015 (80 FR
41566), which revised the 1988 UST
regulations and the 1988 State program
approval (SPA) regulations (2015
Federal Revisions). As required by 40
CFR 281.20, the State Application
contains the following: A transmittal
letter from the Governor requesting
approval, a description of the program
and operating procedures, a
demonstration of the State’s procedures
to ensure adequate enforcement, a
Memorandum of Agreement outlining
the roles and responsibilities of the EPA
and the implementing agency, a
statement of certification from the
Attorney General, and copies of all
relevant state statutes and regulations.
We have reviewed the State Application
and determined that the revisions to
Oregon’s UST program are equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the corresponding Federal
requirements in subpart C of 40 CFR
part 281, and that the Oregon program
provides for adequate enforcement of
compliance with these requirements (40
CFR 281.11(b)). Therefore, the EPA
grants Oregon final approval to operate
its UST program with the changes
described in the program revision
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 144 (Friday, July 26, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35996-36000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15647]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0157; FRL-9994-63]
Lactic Acid; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of lactic acid (CAS Reg. No. 50-21-5) when
used as an inert ingredient (acidifier) on food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy processing equipment, food-processing
equipment and utensils at 10,000 parts per million (ppm). Ecolab Inc.
submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of lactic acid when
used in accordance with the terms specified in the regulation.
[[Page 35997]]
DATES: This regulation is effective July 26, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 24, 2019,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0157, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0157 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
September 24, 2019. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0157, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of May 18, 2018 (83 FR 23247) (FRL-9976-
87), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C.
346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-11113) by
Ecolab Inc., 655 Lone Oak Drive, Eagan, MN 55121. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.940(a) be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of lactic
acid (CAS Reg. No. 50-21-5) when used as an inert ingredient
(acidifier) in pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces
in public eating places, dairy processing equipment, food-processing
equipment and utensils at 10,000 parts per million (ppm). That document
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Ecolab Inc., the
petitioner, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(c)(2)(B) requires EPA, in
determining whether an exemption would be safe, to take into account
the considerations set forth in subparagraphs (b)(2)(C) and (D).
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a
[[Page 35998]]
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .''
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for lactic acid including exposure
resulting from the exemption established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with lactic acid follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by lactic acid as well as the no-
observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-
effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in this
unit.
Lactic acid is practically non-toxic to mammals, apart from
irritation stemming from its low pH. It is an endogenous compound
produced in the mammalian system. L-lactic acid (lactate) is a product
of fermentation in the muscles produced from pyruvate via lactate
dehydrogenase. Lactate is also generated from glucose under aerobic
conditions in some tissues and cell types. L-Lactic acid is normally
found in the blood and interstitial fluid of humans at a level of 10
mg/dL (EPA 2009). In addition, L-lactic acid occurs naturally in
several foods, primarily found in fermented milk products such as sour
milk, cheese, buttermilk and yogurt. It also occurs naturally in meats,
fruits, tomato juice, beer, wine, molasses, blood and muscles of
animals, and in the soil.
The available acute toxicity studies indicate that lactic acid is
not acutely toxic via the oral or inhalation route of exposure. Because
the test substance (80% lactic acid) has a very low pH (<1), L-lactic
acid is a severe dermal irritant in rabbits but not a skin sensitizer
at high concentrations (e.g., 80%).
Although some minor effects were observed in repeat dosing studies
in rats (e.g., decrease in body weight gain or organ weight gain), no
significant systemic toxicity was identified for lactic acid, even at
dose levels greater than 1,000 mg/kg/day. In addition, there was no
indication of developmental toxicity in a developmental toxicity study
in mice. Furthermore, none of the available data indicate that lactic
acid is neurotoxic, immunotoxic, or carcinogenic.
Based on a review of 15 mutagenicity and clastogenicity studies on
lactic acid and the ammonium, calcium, and sodium salts of lactic acid,
EPA notes that the results were negative for all studies and there is
no evidence that lactic acid is genotoxic.
In an in vitro chromosomal aberration study, some pseudo-positive
reactions were observed at low pH.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Although the toxicity database for lactic acid is limited, the
toxicity profile indicates no significant systemic toxicity even at
high dose levels. Since no toxicity is observed, an endpoint of concern
for risk assessment purposes was not identified.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to lactic acid, EPA considered exposure under the proposed
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. EPA assessed dietary
exposures from lactic acid in food as follows:
Dietary exposure to lactic acid may occur following ingestion of
foods containing residues of lactic acid from its use as an acidifier
in pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces as well as
from other pesticidal uses that are already approved that may result in
residues o treated crops. In addition, lactic acid occurs naturally in
several foods and in the soil. However, a quantitative dietary exposure
assessment was not conducted since a toxicological endpoint for risk
assessment was not identified.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. Since a hazard endpoint of
concern was not identified for the acute and chronic dietary
assessment, a quantitative dietary exposure risk assessment for
drinking water was not conducted, although exposures may be expected
from use on food crops.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
Lactic acid may be used in pesticide products and non-pesticide
products that may be used in and around the home. Based on the lack of
a hazard endpoint of concern above, a quantitative residential exposure
assessment for lactic acid was not conducted.
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found lactic acid to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and lactic acid does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that
lactic acid does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Based on the lack of threshold effects, EPA has not identified any
toxicological endpoints of concern and is conducting a qualitative
assessment of lactic acid. That qualitative assessment does not use
safety factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor is
needed for
[[Page 35999]]
assessing risk to infants and children. Based on an assessment of
lactic acid, EPA has concluded that there are no toxicological
endpoints of concern for the U.S. population, including infants and
children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Because no toxicological endpoints of concern were identified, EPA
concludes that aggregate exposure to residues of lactic acid will not
pose a risk to the U.S. population, including infants and children, and
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure
to lactic acid residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established under 40 CFR 180.940(a) for lactic acid (CAS Reg. No. 50-
21-5) when used as an inert ingredient (acidifier) in pesticide
formulations applied to food-contact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy processing equipment, food-processing equipment and utensils at
10,000 ppm.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a regulatory action under
Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 5, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.940, add alphabetically the inert ingredient ``lactic
acid'' to the table in paragraph (a) and remove the inert ingredient
``lactic acid'' from the table in paragraph (c).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active and inert ingredients
for use in antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact surface sanitizing
solutions).
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pesticide chemical CAS Reg. No. Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Lactic acid..................... 50-21-5 When ready for use,
the end-use
concentration is not
to exceed 10,000 ppm
in antimicrobial
formulations applied
to food-contact
surfaces in public
eating places.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 36000]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-15647 Filed 7-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P