Oregon: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions, Codification and Incorporation by Reference, 36000-36007 [2019-15311]
Download as PDF
36000
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–15647 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 282
[EPA–R10–UST–2019–0191; 9996–69–
Region 10]
Oregon: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions, Codification and
Incorporation by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the State
of Oregon’s Underground Storage Tank
(UST) program submitted by the State.
The EPA has determined that these
revisions satisfy all requirements
needed for program approval. This
action also codifies the EPA’s approval
of Oregon’s State program and
incorporates by reference those
provisions of the State’s regulations that
we have determined meet the
requirements for approval. The State’s
federally-authorized and codified UST
program, as revised pursuant to this
action, will remain subject to the EPA’s
inspection and enforcement authorities
under Sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA
Subtitle I and other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
DATES: This rule is effective September
24, 2019, unless the EPA receives
adverse comment by August 26, 2019. If
EPA receives adverse comment, it will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. The
incorporation by reference of certain
material listed in the regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register, as of September 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: wilder.scott@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Scott Wilder, Region 10,
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
Division, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 155, MS: OCE–201,
Seattle, WA 98101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Scott Wilder, Region
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
10, Enforcement and Compliance
Assurance Division, EPA Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle,
WA 98101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R10–UST–2019–
0191. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or email. The
Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, then your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, then the
EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties, and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA
may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
You can view and copy the
documents that form the basis for this
action and associated publicly available
materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday at the following
location: EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101,
phone number (206) 553–6693.
Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 2
days in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Wilder, (206) 553–6693,
wilder.scott@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Scott Wilder at (206)
553–6693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Approval of Revisions to Oregon’s
Underground Storage Tank Program
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States which have received final
approval from the EPA under RCRA
Section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that
is equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the Federal
underground storage tank program.
When the EPA makes revisions to the
regulations that govern the UST
program, states must revise their
programs to comply with the updated
regulations and submit these revisions
to the EPA for approval. Most
commonly, states must change their
programs because of changes to the
EPA’s regulations in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 280. States can
also initiate changes on their own to
their underground storage tank program
and these changes must then be
approved by the EPA.
B. What decisions has the EPA made in
this rule?
On October 19, 2018, in accordance
with 40 CFR 281.51(a), Oregon
submitted a complete program revision
application seeking the EPA approval
for its UST program revisions (State
Application). Oregon’s revisions
correspond to the EPA final rule
published on July 15, 2015 (80 FR
41566), which revised the 1988 UST
regulations and the 1988 State program
approval (SPA) regulations (2015
Federal Revisions). As required by 40
CFR 281.20, the State Application
contains the following: A transmittal
letter from the Governor requesting
approval, a description of the program
and operating procedures, a
demonstration of the State’s procedures
to ensure adequate enforcement, a
Memorandum of Agreement outlining
the roles and responsibilities of the EPA
and the implementing agency, a
statement of certification from the
Attorney General, and copies of all
relevant state statutes and regulations.
We have reviewed the State Application
and determined that the revisions to
Oregon’s UST program are equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the corresponding Federal
requirements in subpart C of 40 CFR
part 281, and that the Oregon program
provides for adequate enforcement of
compliance with these requirements (40
CFR 281.11(b)). Therefore, the EPA
grants Oregon final approval to operate
its UST program with the changes
described in the program revision
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
application, and as outlined below in
Section I.G of this document.
C. What is the effect of this action on the
regulated community?
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations being approved by this rule
are already in effect in the State of
Oregon, and are not changed by this
action. This action merely approves the
existing State regulations as meeting the
Federal requirements and renders them
federally enforceable.
D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment. Oregon
did not receive any comments during its
comment period when the rules and
regulations being considered in this
document were proposed at the State
level.
E. What happens if the EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
Along with this direct final rule, the
EPA is publishing a separate document
in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register that serves as the
proposal to approve the State’s UST
program revisions, and provides an
opportunity for public comment. If EPA
receives comments that oppose this
approval, then the EPA will withdraw
this direct final rule by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
it becomes effective. The EPA will base
any further decision on approval of the
State Application after considering all
comments received during the comment
period. The EPA will then address all
public comments in a later final rule.
You may not have another opportunity
to comment. If you want to comment on
this approval, then you must do so at
this time.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
F. For what has Oregon previously been
approved?
On September 16, 2011, the EPA
finalized a rule approving the UST
program that Oregon proposed to
administer in lieu of the Federal UST
program. On April 30, 2012, the EPA
codified the provisions of the approved
Oregon program that are part of the
underground storage tank program
under Subtitle I of RCRA, and therefore
are subject to the EPA’s inspection and
enforcement authorities under RCRA
Sections 9005 and 9006, 42 U.S.C.
6991d and 6991e, and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
G. What changes are we approving with
this action and what standards do we
use for review?
In order to be approved, each state
program application must meet the
general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11,
and specific requirements in 40 CFR
part 281, subpart B (Components of a
Program Application); subpart C
(Criteria for No Less Stringent); and
subpart D (Adequate Enforcement of
Compliance). This is also true for
proposed revisions to approved state
programs.
As more fully described below, the
State has made the changes to its
approved UST program to reflect the
2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA is
approving the State’s changes because
they are equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
UST program and because the EPA has
confirmed that the Oregon UST program
will continue to provide for adequate
enforcement of compliance with these
requirements as described in 40 CFR
281.11(b) and part 281, subpart D, after
this approval.
The Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) is the lead
implementing agency for the UST
program in Oregon, except in Indian
country.
The DEQ continues to have broad
statutory authority to regulate the
installation, operation, maintenance,
and closure of USTs, as well as UST
releases under Oregon Statutes (2017),
Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials II, Sections 605–
995. The Oregon UST Program gets its
enforcement authority from the powers
and duties of the DEQ found in Chapter
466, Section 015. Under Chapter 466,
Sections 765(3), 765(5), and 805(a) the
DEQ is authorized to require an owner
to furnish records, conduct monitoring
or testing, and provide access to tanks.
The DEQ is authorized to issue, modify,
suspend, revoke or refuse to renew a
permit under Chapter 466, Section 775.
Penalties for non-compliance may be
assessed under Chapter 466, Section
837(1).
Specific authorities to regulate the
installation, operation, maintenance,
and closure of USTs, as well as UST
releases are found under Oregon
Administrative Rule (OAR), as amended
effective June 1, 2018, Chapter 340,
Division 150, Underground Storage
Tank Rules; DEQ may prohibit delivery
to any UST identified by DEQ as
ineligible for delivery under OAR 340–
150–0020(1), 0080, 0150, 0152, and
0163; reporting and recordkeeping
requirements are found under OAR
340–150–0135. Procedures for receipt,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36001
evaluation, retention and investigation
of required records and reports are
under OAR 340–150–0135. The
aforementioned statutory sections and
regulations satisfy the requirements of
40 CFR 281.40 and 281.41.
Through a Memorandum of
Agreement between the State of Oregon
and the EPA, effective September 24,
2019, the State maintains procedures for
receiving and ensuring proper
consideration of information about
violations submitted by the public. The
State agrees to comply with public
participation provisions contained in 40
CFR 281.42 including the provision that
the State will not oppose intervention
under Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure
33C, its analogue to Federal Rule
24(a)(2), on the grounds that the
applicant’s interest is adequately
represented by the State. Oregon has
met the public participation
requirements found in 40 CFR 281.42.
To qualify for final approval,
revisions to a state’s program must be
‘‘equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent’’ than the 2015 Federal
Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions
the EPA addressed UST systems
deferred in the 1988 UST regulations,
and added, among other things, new
operation and maintenance
requirements; secondary containment
requirements for new and replaced
tanks and piping; operator training
requirements; and a requirement to
ensure UST system compatibility before
storing certain biofuel blends. In
addition, the EPA removed past
deferrals for emergency generator tanks,
field constructed tanks, and airport
hydrant systems. The EPA analyzes
revisions to approved state programs
pursuant to the criteria found in 40 CFR
281.30 through 281.39.
The DEQ has revised its regulations to
help ensure that the State’s UST
program revisions are equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent
than the 2015 Federal Revisions.
Title 40 CFR 281.39 describes the
state operator training requirements that
must be met to be considered equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than Federal requirements. Oregon did
not incorporate by reference Federal
requirements for operator training, and
has promulgated and is implementing
its own operator training provisions
under OAR 340–150–0200, 0210, and
0315. After a thorough review, the EPA
has determined that Oregon’s operator
training requirements are equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent
than federal requirements.
As part of the State Application the
Oregon Attorney General certified that
the State revisions meet the
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
36002
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
requirements ‘‘equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent’’ criteria in
40 CFR 281.30 through 281.39. The EPA
is relying on this certification in
addition to the analysis submitted by
the State in making our determination.
H. Where are the revised rules different
from the Federal rules?
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Broader in Scope Provisions
Where an approved state program has
a greater scope of coverage than
required by Federal law, the additional
coverage is not part of the federallyapproved program and is not federally
enforceable (40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)).
The following statutory and regulatory
requirements are considered broader in
coverage than the Federal program as
these State-only regulations are not
required by Federal regulation and are
implemented by the State in addition to
the federally approved program:
Heating oil tanks are regulated under
OAR Chapter 340 Division 177. DEQ’s
requirement to report and clean up
releases from underground heating oil
tanks (HOTs) is broader in scope.
Additionally, DEQ encourages voluntary
decommissioning of HOTs and licenses
UST and HOT service providers and
supervisors. These programs are also
broader in scope than the federal
program.
Tank owners who install,
decommission or test their own tanks
are required to take the same
proficiency examination as UST
supervisors to ensure that they have the
technical knowledge to do the work
safely and correctly.
The universe of ‘‘suspected releases
that trigger reporting, investigation and
confirmation’’ under OAR 340–150–
0500 may be broader than the Federal
rule, including discovery of a release
into a secondary containment area and
monitoring results or alarms from
release detection systems.
The State has provided for release
response and corrective action in its
remedial action rules under OAR
Chapter 340, Division 122. As a general
matter, the universe of regulated
persons is broader under the state rules
than under the federal rules. The
obligations in Division 122 are imposed
upon ‘‘the responsible person,’’ a term
that appears to encompass a broader
class of persons than the term ‘‘owner
and operator’’.
The State standard for system
cleaning upon permanent closure is the
same as that found at 40 CFR 280.71(b),
except that the State requirements apply
to the UST system as a whole, whereas
the Federal requirements apply to tanks.
If the permittee proposes to close the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
UST in place and fill it, then the
permittee must submit a site assessment
plan. Closure cannot begin until the
plan is approved by the DEQ.
The operation and maintenance of
corrosion protection systems apply to
all USTs and piping. The Federal rules
apply only to steel UST systems with
corrosion protection.
More Stringent Provisions
Where an approved state program
includes requirements that are
considered more stringent than required
by Federal law, the more stringent
requirements become part of the
federally approved program. (40 CFR
281.12(a)(3)(ii)).
The following statutory and
regulatory requirements are considered
more stringent than the Federal
program, and on approval, they become
part of the federally approved program
and are federally enforceable:
The State rules do not allow the use
of metal tanks or piping without
corrosion protection as allowed in 40
CFR 280.20(a)(4) and (b)(3), which states
that no corrosion protection is required
for metal tanks and piping installed at
a site that have been determined by a
corrosion expert not to be corrosive
enough to cause either the tank or the
piping to have a release due to corrosion
during its operating life. Because the
State does not allow the alternative to
corrosion protection found in 40 CFR
280.20(a)(4), the State rules do not have
a recordkeeping requirement that
corresponds with that in 40 CFR
280.34(b)(1). OAR 340–150–0320.
The State rules do not allow for the
use of alternative types of tanks and
piping determined to be equally
protective in preventing releases as
those otherwise identified in the rules,
as allowed in 40 CFR 280.20(a)(5) and
(b)(4).
The State rules allow only one mode
of certifying the installation. The
certification of compliance must be
signed by the owner, permittee and a
service provider licensed by the
department, and must certify that the
system has been installed in compliance
with the required methods and
standards. OAR 340–150–0160.
The State rules require used USTs
that have been removed from the ground
to be certified by a UST manufacturer in
writing before being reused. OAR 340–
150–0302(2).
The owner and permittee must notify
DEQ at least 30 days before beginning
installation of a UST system. (DEQ may
allow a shorter period on a case-by-case
basis) OAR 340–150–0160(2).
The owner and permittee must notify
DEQ of the confirmed time and date of
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the installation of the UST system at
least three working days before
beginning the installation. DEQ may
also request additional notifications.
OAR 340–150–0160(3).
DEQ’s installation checklist required
upon completion of the installation
requires certification of compliance
with required installation standards and
methods, and the standards for spill and
overfill prevention, corrosion protection
release detection and financial
responsibility as is required by 40 CFR
280.22. DEQ’s installation checklist also
requires the owner and permittee to
provide substantially more information
than appears to be required by 40 CFR
280.22(e) and (f).
Repaired tanks and piping must be
tested after completion of the repairs
and before operation. OAR 340–150–
0350(3)(a) and (4). The Federal rules
allow an UST system to return to service
providing testing is conducted within
30 days of repair.
Any test failures must be reported to
DEQ. OAR 340–150–0163(1)(c) and (e);
OAR 340–150–0325(4); OAR 340–150–
0350(3)(a) and (4).
Repaired tanks, except tanks repaired
by lining, must be certified as meeting
the performance standards by the
original manufacturer or, if unavailable,
another manufacturer of the same type
of tank. OAR–340–0350.
The State requires an investigation of
the magnitude and extent of soil and
groundwater contamination if not
otherwise fully identified in the course
of the initial site characterization. OAR
340–122–0240. This requirement is
more stringent than those under 40 CFR
280.65, to the extent that the additional
investigation in 40 CFR 280.65 is
triggered only if groundwater wells have
been affected, free product is found to
need recovery, soils may be in contact
with groundwater or the implementing
agency requests an investigation.
The permittee must perform a site
assessment before permanent closure or
change in service. OAR 340–150–0168
and OAR 340–150–0180. The State
requirements are more stringent in that
the owner or permittee, which is using
groundwater or vapor monitoring in
accordance with state rules, cannot
satisfy the requirements of the site
assessment by relying on their release
detection method in place at the time of
closure as allowed by 40 CFR 280.72(a).
The rules in OAR Division 150 apply
to all UST systems taken out of
operation between January 1, 1974 and
May 1, 1988, if not emptied and cleaned
as required by OAR 340–150–0168(4),
and to all UST systems taken out of
operation before January 1, 1974, if not
empty. OAR 340–150–0006(2). This
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
requirement is more stringent than the
Federal standard in 40 CFR 280.73,
which states that the owner and
operator of an UST system permanently
closed before December 22, 1988, must
assess the excavation zone and close the
UST system in accordance with the
subpart if releases from the UST may, in
the judgment of the implementing
agency, pose a current or potential
threat to human health and the
environment.
The State rules do not include the
options for overfill prevention
equipment found in 40 CFR
280.20(c)(1)(ii)(C) and (c)(2)(i). In 40
CFR 280.20(c)(1)(ii)(C), Federal rules
allow an overfill device that can restrict
flow 30 minutes prior to overfilling,
alert the transfer operator with a highlevel alarm one minute before
overfilling, or automatically shut off
flow into the tank so that none of the
fittings located on top of the tank are
exposed to product due to overfilling. In
40 CFR 280.20(c)(2)(i), Federal rules
state that owners and operators are not
required to use the spill and overfill
prevention equipment specified in
paragraph (c)(1) of the section if
alternative equipment is used that is
determined by the implementing agency
to be no less protective of human health
and the environment than the
equipment specified in 40 CFR
280.20(c)(1)(i) or (ii).
I. How does this action affect Indian
country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Oregon?
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
The EPA’s approval of Oregon’s
Program does not extend to Indian
country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Indian country generally includes lands
within the exterior boundaries of the
following Indian reservations located
within Oregon: Burns Paiute, Grande
Ronde, Klamath, Siletz, Umatilla and
Warm Springs Reservations; any land
held in trust by the United States for an
Indian tribe; and any other areas that are
‘‘Indian country’’ within the meaning of
18 U.S.C. 1151. Any lands removed
from an Indian reservation status by
Federal court action are not considered
reservation lands even if located within
the exterior boundaries of an Indian
reservation. The EPA will retain
responsibilities under RCRA for
underground storage tanks in Indian
country. Therefore, this action has no
effect in Indian country. See 40 CFR
281.12(a)(2).
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing
a state’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the state’s approved UST
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
program into the CFR. Section 9004(b)
of RCRA, as amended, allows the EPA
to approve State UST programs to
operate in lieu of the Federal program.
The EPA codifies its authorization of
state programs in 40 CFR part 282 and
incorporates by reference state
regulations that the EPA will enforce
under Sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA
and any other applicable statutory
provisions. The incorporation by
reference of state authorized programs
in the CFR should substantially enhance
the public’s ability to discern the
current status of the approved state
program and state requirements that can
be federally enforced. This effort
provides clear notice to the public of the
scope of the approved program in each
state.
B. What is the history of codification of
Oregon’s UST program?
The EPA incorporated by reference
and codified Oregon’s then-approved
UST program in 40 CFR 282.87,
effective June 29, 2012 (77 FR 25368,
April 30, 2012). Through this action, the
EPA is incorporating by reference and
codifying Oregon’s State program in 40
CFR 282.87 to include the approved
revisions.
C. What codification decisions have we
made in this rule?
In this rule, we are finalizing the
regulatory text that incorporates by
reference the federally authorized
Oregon UST Program. In accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we
are finalizing the incorporation by
reference of the Oregon rules described
in the amendments to 40 CFR part 282
set forth below. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 10 office (see the ADDRESSES
section of this preamble for more
information).
One purpose of this Federal Register
document is to codify Oregon’s
approved UST program. The
codification reflects the State program
that would be in effect at the time the
EPA’s approved revisions to the Oregon
UST program addressed in this direct
final rule become final. If, however, the
EPA receives substantive comment on
the rule then this codification will not
take effect, and the State rules that are
approved after the EPA considers public
comment will be codified instead. By
codifying the approved Oregon program
and by amending the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), the public will more
easily be able to discern the status of the
federally-approved requirements of the
Oregon program.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36003
The EPA is incorporating by reference
the Oregon approved UST program in
40 CFR 282.87. Section
282.87(d)(1)(i)(A) and (B) incorporate by
reference for enforcement purposes the
State’s relevant statutes and regulations.
Section 282.87 also references the
Attorney General’s Statement,
Demonstration of Adequate
Enforcement Procedures, the Program
Description, and the Memorandum of
Agreement, which are approved as part
of the UST program under Subtitle I of
RCRA.
D. What is the effect of EPA’s
codification of the federally authorized
State UST Program on enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under
Sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006 of
Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h),
6991d and 6991e, and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions to
undertake corrective action, inspections,
and enforcement actions, and to issue
orders in approved states. If the EPA
determines it will take such actions in
Oregon, the EPA will rely on Federal
sanctions, Federal inspection
authorities, and other Federal
procedures rather than the state analogs.
Therefore, though the EPA has approved
the State procedures listed in 40 CFR
282.87(d)(1)(i), the EPA is not
incorporating by reference Oregon’s
procedural and enforcement authorities.
E. What State provisions are not part of
the codification?
The public also needs to be aware that
some provisions of the State’s UST
program are not part of the federally
approved State program. Such
provisions are not part of the RCRA
Subtitle I program because they are
‘‘broader in coverage’’ than Subtitle I of
RCRA. Title 40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)
states that where an approved State
program has provisions that are broader
in coverage than the Federal program,
those provisions are not a part of the
federally approved program. As a result,
State provisions which are ‘‘broader in
coverage’’ than the Federal program are
not incorporated by reference for
purposes of enforcement in part 282.
Title 40 CFR 282.87(d)(1)(iii) lists for
reference and clarity the Oregon
statutory and regulatory provisions
which are ‘‘broader in coverage’’ than
the Federal program and which are not,
therefore, part of the approved program
being codified in this rule. Provisions
that are ‘‘broader in coverage’’ cannot be
enforced by EPA; the State, however,
will continue to implement and enforce
such provisions under State law.
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
36004
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
III. Statutory and Executive Order
(E.O.) Reviews
This action only applies to Oregon’s
UST Program requirements pursuant to
RCRA Section 9004 and imposes no
requirements other than those imposed
by State law. It complies with
applicable EOs and statutory provisions
as follows:
A. Executive Order 12866 Regulatory
Planning and Review, Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and is therefore not
subject to review under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not an Executive Order
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017)
regulatory action because actions such
as this final approval of Oregon’s
revised underground storage tank
program under RCRA are exempted
under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Because this action approves and
codifies pre-existing requirements under
state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1531–1538). For the same
reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely
approves and codifies state
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
requirements as part of the State RCRA
Underground Storage Tank Program
without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant, as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because the
EPA does not believe the environmental
health or safety risks addressed by this
action present a disproportionate risk to
children.
F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001) because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined under
Executive Order 12866.
G. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Under RCRA Section 9004(b), the EPA
grants a state’s application for approval
as long as the state meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for the
EPA, when it reviews a state approval
application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard
in place of another standard that
otherwise satisfies the requirements of
RCRA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
As required by section 3 of Executive
Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7,
1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct.
I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
The EPA has complied with Executive
Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar. 15, 1988)
by examining the takings implications
of the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low
Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this rule approves pre-existing
state rules which are at least equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than existing Federal requirements, and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law, and
there are no anticipated significant
adverse human health or environmental
effects, the rule is not subject to
Executive Order 12898.
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801–808, generally provides that
before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
However, this action will be effective
September 24, 2019 because it is a direct
final rule.
Authority: This rule is issued under the
authority of Sections 2002(a), 7004(b), and
9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a),
6974(b), and 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 282
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
reference, State program approval,
Underground storage tanks.
Dated: June 27, 2019.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR part
282 as follows:
PART 282—APPROVED
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 282
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d,
and 6991e.
■
2. Revise § 282.87 to read as follows:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
§ 282.87 Oregon State-Administered
Program.
(a) The State of Oregon is approved to
administer and enforce an underground
storage tank program in lieu of the
Federal program under Subtitle I of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, 42
U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The State’s program,
as administered by the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ), was approved by EPA pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and part 281 of this
chapter. The EPA published the notice
of final determination approving the
Oregon underground storage tank base
program effective on September 16,
2011. A subsequent program revision
application was approved by the EPA
and became effective on September 24,
2019.
(b) Oregon has primary responsibility
for administering and enforcing its
federally approved underground storage
tank program. However, the EPA retains
the authority to exercise its corrective
action, inspection, and enforcement
authorities under Sections 9003(h),
9005, and 9006 of Subtitle I of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d and 6991e, as
well as under any other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions.
(c) To retain program approval,
Oregon must revise its approved
program to adopt new changes to the
Federal Subtitle I program which make
it more stringent, in accordance with
section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c,
and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If
Oregon obtains approval for the revised
requirements pursuant to Section 9004
of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, then the
newly approved statutory and
regulatory provisions will be added to
this subpart and notification of any
change will be published in the Federal
Register.
(d) Oregon has final approval for the
following elements of its program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
application originally submitted to the
EPA and approved effective September
16, 2011, and the program revision
application approved by the EPA,
effective on September 24, 2019:
(1) State statutes and regulations. (i)
The materials cited in this paragraph
(d)(1) are incorporated by reference as
part of the underground storage tank
program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42
U.S.C. 6991 et seq., with the approval of
the Director of the Federal Register
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
To enforce any edition other than that
specified in this section, the EPA must
publish a document in the Federal
Register and the material must be
available to the public. All approved
material is available for inspection at
EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, phone
number (206) 553–6693. Copies of
Oregon’s program application may be
obtained from the Underground Storage
Tank Program, Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality, 811 SW Sixth
Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97204. All
approved material is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of the
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or
go to www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(A) Oregon Statutory Requirements
Applicable to the Underground Storage
Tank Program, June 2018.
(B) Oregon Regulatory Requirements
Applicable to the Underground Storage
Tank Program, June 2018.
(ii) The EPA considered the following
statutes and regulations in evaluating
the State program, but did not
incorporate them by reference.
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter
183, Administrative Procedures Act,
2017, insofar as the provisions and
procedures apply to the underground
storage tank program.
(2) Chapter 465, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials I (Removal or
Remedial Action: Sections 465.200–
465.482 and 465.900), insofar as these
provisions apply to matters involving an
‘‘underground storage tank’’ as that term
is defined in ORS 466.706(21), as
limited by the exclusions listed in ORS
466.710, except that the term does not
include a tank used for storing heating
oil for consumptive use on the premises
where stored. The following Sections
are part of the approved State program,
although not incorporated by reference
herein for enforcement purposes:
Sections 465.205 through 465.250,
465.257 through 465.300, 465.310
through 465.335, 465.400 through
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36005
465.435, 465.445 through 465.455 and
465.900.
(3) Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials II (Oil Storage
Tanks: Sections 466.706–466.920 and
Sections 466.990–466.995), insofar as
these provisions apply to matters
involving an ‘‘underground storage
tank’’ as that term is defined in ORS
466.706(21), as limited by the
exclusions listed in ORS 466.710,
except that the term does not include a
tank used for storing heating oil for
consumptive use on the premises where
stored. The following Sections are part
of the approved State program, although
not incorporated by reference herein for
enforcement purposes: Sections 466.715
through 466.735, 466.746, 466.760,
466.775 through 466.780, 466.791
through 466.810, 466.820, 466.830
through 466.845, 466.901 through
466.920 and 466.994 through 466.995.
(4) Chapter 468 Environmental
Quality Generally, insofar as these
provisions apply to matters involving an
‘‘underground storage tank’’ as that term
is defined in ORS 466.706(21), as
limited by the exclusions listed in ORS
466.710, except that the term does not
include a tank used for storing heating
oil for consumptive use on the premises
where stored. The following Sections
are part of the approved State program,
although not incorporated by reference
herein for enforcement purposes:
Sections 468.005 through 468.050,
468.090 through 468.140 and 468.963.
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 340, Division 11: Section 340–
11–0545.
(2) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 340, Division 12: Sections 340–
012–0026 through 340–012–0053, 340–
012–0067 (with the exception of
subparagraphs (1)(k) and (l) and (2)(g)
through (j)), 340–012–0074 (with the
exception of subparagraph (1)(g)) and
340–012–0170 insofar as this applies to
violations involving an underground
storage tank.
(3) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 340, Division 122: Sections
340–122–0074 through 340–122–0079
and 340–122–0130 through 340–122–
0140.
(4) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 340, Division 142: Section 340–
142–0120.
(5) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 340, Division 150: Sections
340–150–0150 through 340–150–0152,
340–150–0250, 340–150–0600 through
340–150–0620.
(6) Oregon Code of Civil Procedure
33C.
(7) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 690, Division 240, insofar as
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
36006
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
these provisions apply to matters
involving an ‘‘underground storage
tank’’ as that term is defined in ORS
466.706(21), as limited by the
exclusions listed in ORS 466.710,
except that the term does not include a
tank used for storing heating oil for
consumptive use on the premises where
stored. The following Sections are part
of the approved State program, although
not incorporated by reference herein for
enforcement purposes: Sections 690–
240–0015, 690–240–0020, 690–240–
0055 through 690–240–0340 and 690–
240–0560 through 690–240–0640.
(iii) The following specifically
identified sections and rules applicable
to the Oregon underground storage tank
program that are broader in scope than
the Federal program, are not part of the
approved program, and are not
incorporated by reference herein for
enforcement purposes:
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Chapter 465, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials I (Removal or
Remedial Action): Sections 465.305;
465.340 through 465.391; 465.440; and
465.475 through 465.482.
(2) Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials II (Oil Storage
Tanks): Sections 466.750; 466.783
through 466.787; 466.858 through
466.882; and 466.990 through 466.992).
(3) Chapter 468, Environmental
Quality Generally: Sections 468.055
through 468.089.
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 340: Divisions 160, 162, 163,
170, 177 and 178.
(2) Oregon Administrative Rules,
Chapter 837, Division 40.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The
Attorney General Statement, a letter
signed on October 12, 2018, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground
storage tank program under Subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for
adequate enforcement. The
‘‘Demonstration of Procedures for
Adequate Enforcement’’ submitted as
part of the application for approval on
October 19, 2018, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced
as part of the approved underground
storage tank program under Subtitle I of
RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(4) Program description. The program
description and any other material
submitted as part of the original
application on October 19, 2018, though
not incorporated by reference, are
referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program
under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The
Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 10 and the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality,
signed by the EPA Regional
Administrator on March 19, 2019,
though not incorporated by reference, is
referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program
under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
■ 3. Appendix A to part 282 is amended
by revising the entry for Oregon to read
as follows:
Appendix A to Part 282—State
Requirements Incorporated by
Reference in Part 282 of the Code of
Federal Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
Oregon
(a) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Chapter 465, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials I (Removal or Remedial
Action Sections 465.200 through 465.425):
465.200 Definitions for ORS 465.200 to
465.425 (except for Sections 465.200(5)
through (11) and (17) defining terms
contained in the dry cleaning requirements;
(13) ‘‘facility’’ insofar as it applies to a
facility that is not an underground storage
tank; (16) ‘‘hazardous substance’’ insofar as it
applies to hazardous wastes and any
substance that is not otherwise defined as a
hazardous substance pursuant to section
101(14) of the Federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act or that is not oil; (28)
‘‘underground storage tank’’ insofar as it
includes any tank or piping that is excluded
under ORS 466.710 and also any tank used
to store heating oil for consumptive use on
the premises where stored.)
465.255 Strict liability for remedial action
costs for injury or destruction of natural
resource; limited exclusions (except insofar
as this includes a person who is not an owner
or operator of an underground storage tank
and except insofar as the exclusions would
exclude persons who would be liable under
Section 9003(h)(6) of RCRA).
(2) Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials II (Oil Storage Tanks):
466.706 Definitions for ORS 466.706 to
466.882 and 466.994 (except for the
following definitions: Section 466.706(17)
‘‘regulated substance’’ insofar as it would
include substances designated by the
commission under subsection (c) that are not
included under subsections (a) and (b) of this
definition; (21) ‘‘underground storage tank’’
insofar as it includes any tank or piping that
is excluded under ORS 466.710, and any tank
used to store heating oil for consumptive use
on the premises where stored.)
466.710 Application of ORS 466.706 to
466.882 and 466.994
466.740 Noncomplying installation
prohibited
466.743 Training on operation,
maintenance and testing; rules
466.765 Duty of owner or permittee of
underground storage tank
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
466.770 Corrective action required on
contaminated site
466.815 Financial responsibility of owner
or permittee; rules; legislative review
466.825 Strict liability of owner or
permittee
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter
340, Division 122 insofar as the following
rules apply to a release from an underground
storage tank, excluding tanks used to store
heating oil for consumptive use on the
premises where stored.
340–122–0010 Purpose
340–122–0030 Scope and Applicability
340–122–0040 Standards
340–122–0047 Generic remedies
340–122–0050 Activities
340–122–0070 Removal
340–122–0071 Site Evaluation
340–122–0072 Preliminary Assessments
340–122–0073 Confirmation of Release
340–122–0080 Remedial Investigation
340–122–0084 Risk Assessment
340–122–0085 Feasibility Study
340–122–0090 Selection or Approval of the
Remedial Action
340–122–0100 Public Notice and
Participation
340–122–0110 Administrative Record
340–122–0115 Definitions insofar as the
definition applies to an underground
storage tank, excluding tanks used to
store heating oil for consumptive use on
the premises where stored
340–122–0120 Security Interest Exemption
340–122–0205 Purpose
340–122–0210 Definitions except insofar as
the definition of ‘‘responsible person’’
includes a person who does not own or
operate an underground storage tank
340–122–0215 Scope and Applicability
340–122–0217 Requirements and
Remediation Options
340–122–0218 Sampling and Analysis
340–122–0220 Initial Response
340–122–0225 Initial Abatement Measures
and Site Check
340–122–0230 Initial Site Characterization
340–122–0235 Free Product Removal
340–122–0240 Investigation for Magnitude
and Extent of Contamination
340–122–0243 Low-Impact Sites
340–122–0244 Risk-Based Concentrations
340–122–0250 Corrective Action Plan
340–122–0252 Generic Remedies
340–122–0260 Public Participation
340–122–0320 Soil Matrix Cleanup Options
340–122–0325 Evaluation of Matrix
Cleanup Level
340–122–0330 Evaluation Parameters
340–122–0335 Numeric Soil Cleanup
Standards
340–122–0340 Sample Number and
Location
340–122–0345 Sample Collection Methods
340–122–0355 Evaluation of Analytical
Results
340–122–0360 Reporting Requirements
(2) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter
340, Division 142 insofar as the following
rules apply to a release from an underground
storage tank, excluding tanks used to store
heating oil for consumptive use on the
premises where stored.
340–142–0001 Purpose and Scope
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
340–142–0005 Definitions as Used in This
Division Unless Otherwise Specified
340–142–0030 Emergency Action
340–142–0040 Required Reporting
340–142–0050 Reportable Quantities
340–142–0060 Cleanup Standards
340–142–0070 Approval Required for Use
of Chemicals
340–142–0080 Disposal of Recovered Spill
Materials
340–142–0090 Cleanup Report
340–142–0100 Sampling/Testing
Procedures
340–142–0130 Incident Management and
Emergency Operations
(3) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter
340, Division 150.
340–150–0001 Purpose
340–150–0006 Applicability and General
Requirements
340–150–0008 Exemptions and Deferrals
340–150–0010 Definitions
340–150–0020 UST General Permit
Registration Certificate Required except
insofar as this provision applies to a
person who does not own or operate an
underground storage tank and except
insofar as the payment of fees is required
340–150–0021 Termination of Temporary
Permits
340–150–0052 Modification of Registration
Certificates for Changes in Ownership
and Permittee except insofar as the
payment of fees is required
340–150–0080 Denial, Suspension or
Revocation of General Permit
Registration Certificates except insofar as
this provision applies to a person who
does not own or operate an underground
storage tank
340–150–0102 Termination of Registration
Certificates
340–150–0110 UST General Permit
Registration, Annual Compliance and
Other Fees except insofar as the payment
of fees is required
340–150–0135 General Requirements for
Owners and Permittees
340–150–0137 UST Systems with FieldConstructed Tanks and Airport Hydrat
Fuel Distribution Systems
340–150–0140 Requirements for Sellers of
USTs
340–150–0156 Performance of UST
Services by Owners or Permittees
340–150–0160 General Permit
Requirements for Installing an UST
System except insofar as this provision
applies to a person who does not own or
operate an underground storage tank
340–150–0163 General Permit
Requirements for Operating an UST
System except insofar as the payment of
fees is required
340–150–0167 General Permit
Requirements for Temporary Closure of
an UST System except insofar as the
payment of fees is required
340–150–0168 General Permit
Requirements for Decommissioning an
UST System by Permanent Closure
except insofar as this provision applies
to a person who does not own or operate
an underground storage tank and except
insofar as the payment of fees is required
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
340–150–0180 Site Assessment
Requirements for Permanent Closure or
Change-in-Service
340–150–0200 Training Requirements for
UST System Operators and Emergency
Response Information
340–150–0210 Training Requirements for
UST Operators
340–150–0302 Installation of Used USTs
340–150–0310 Spill and Overfill Prevention
Equipment and Requirements
340–150–0315 Priodic operation and
maintenance walkthrough inspections
340–150–0320 Corrosion Protection
Performance Standards for USTs and
Piping
340–150–0325 Operation and Maintenance
of Corrosion Protection
340–150–0350 UST System Repairs
340–150–0352 UST System Modifications
and Additions
340–150–0354 UST System Replacements
340–150–0360 Requirements for Internally
Lined USTs
340–150–0400 General Release Detection
Requirements for Petroleum UST
Systems
340–150–0410 Release Detection
Requirements and Methods for
Underground Piping
340–150–0420 Release Detection
Requirements for Hazardous Substance
UST Systems
340–150–0430 Inventory Control Method of
Release Detection
340–150–0435 Statistical Inventory
Reconciliation Method of Release
Detection
340–150–0440 Manual Tank Gauging
Release Detection Method
340–150–0445 Tank Tightness Testing for
Release Detection and Investigation
340–150–0450 Automatic Tank Gauging
Release Detection Method
340–150–0465 Interstitial Monitoring
Release Detection Method
340–150–0470 Other Methods of Release
Detection
340–150–0500 Reporting Suspected
Releases
340–150–0510 Suspected Release
Investigation and Confirmation Steps
340–150–0520 Investigation Due to Off Site
Impacts
340–150–0540 Applicability to Previously
Closed UST Systems
340–150–0550 Definitions for OAR 340–
150–0555 and 340–150–0560
340–150–0555 Compliance Dates for USTs
and Piping
340–150–0560 Upgrading Requirements for
Existing UST Systems
(4) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter
340, Division 151
340–151–0001 Purpose
340–151–0010 Scope and Applicability
340–151–0015 Adoption and Applicability
of United States Environmental
Protection Agency Regulations
340–151–0020 Definitions
340–151–0025 Oregon-Specific Financial
Responsibility Requirements
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–15311 Filed 7–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36007
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 578
[Docket No. NHTSA–2018–0017]
RIN 2127–AL94
Civil Penalties
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule confirms the
determination NHTSA announced in
the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) that the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015 (Inflation Adjustment Act or
2015 Act) does not apply to the civil
penalty rate applicable to automobile
manufacturers that fail to meet
applicable corporate average fuel
economy (CAFE) standards and are
unable to offset such a deficit with
compliance credits. In addition, this
final rule is finalizing the agency’s
determination that even if the Inflation
Adjustment Act applies, increasing the
CAFE civil penalty rate would have a
negative economic impact, and
therefore, in accordance with the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act of 1975
(EPCA) and the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), the
current CAFE civil penalty rate of $5.50
should be retained, instead of increasing
to $14 in model year 2019.
DATES:
Effective dates: This rule is effective
as of September 24, 2019. Upon
reconsideration, this rule supersedes the
final rule published at 81 FR 95489,
December 28, 2016 (delayed at 82 FR
8694, January 30, 2017, 82 FR 15302,
March 28, 2017, 82 FR 29010, June 27,
2017, and 82 FR 32139, July 12, 2017),
which went into force in accordance
with the decision of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
in NRDC v. NHTSA, Case No. 17–2780.
Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions
for reconsideration of this final rule
must be received not later than
September 9, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Any petitions for
reconsideration should refer to the
docket number of this document and be
submitted to: Deputy Administrator,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building, Fourth
Floor, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kerry Kolodziej, Office of Chief
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 144 (Friday, July 26, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36000-36007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15311]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 282
[EPA-R10-UST-2019-0191; 9996-69-Region 10]
Oregon: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions, Codification and Incorporation by Reference
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the State of Oregon's Underground
Storage Tank (UST) program submitted by the State. The EPA has
determined that these revisions satisfy all requirements needed for
program approval. This action also codifies the EPA's approval of
Oregon's State program and incorporates by reference those provisions
of the State's regulations that we have determined meet the
requirements for approval. The State's federally-authorized and
codified UST program, as revised pursuant to this action, will remain
subject to the EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities under
Sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA Subtitle I and other applicable
statutory and regulatory provisions.
DATES: This rule is effective September 24, 2019, unless the EPA
receives adverse comment by August 26, 2019. If EPA receives adverse
comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The
incorporation by reference of certain material listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register, as of
September 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: [email protected].
3. Mail: Scott Wilder, Region 10, Enforcement and Compliance
Assurance Division, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, MS:
OCE-201, Seattle, WA 98101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Scott Wilder,
Region 10, Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division, EPA Region
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R10-UST-
2019-0191. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov, or email. The Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://www.regulations.gov, then your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
internet. If you submit an electronic comment, then the EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties, and cannot contact you
for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
You can view and copy the documents that form the basis for this
action and associated publicly available materials from 8:30 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday at the following location: EPA Region
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, phone number (206)
553-6693. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents should
make an appointment with the office at least 2 days in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Wilder, (206) 553-6693,
[email protected]. To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment with Scott Wilder at (206) 553-6693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Approval of Revisions to Oregon's Underground Storage Tank Program
A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States which have received final approval from the EPA under RCRA
Section 9004(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c(b), must maintain an
underground storage tank program that is equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the Federal underground storage tank
program. When the EPA makes revisions to the regulations that govern
the UST program, states must revise their programs to comply with the
updated regulations and submit these revisions to the EPA for approval.
Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to
the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 280.
States can also initiate changes on their own to their underground
storage tank program and these changes must then be approved by the
EPA.
B. What decisions has the EPA made in this rule?
On October 19, 2018, in accordance with 40 CFR 281.51(a), Oregon
submitted a complete program revision application seeking the EPA
approval for its UST program revisions (State Application). Oregon's
revisions correspond to the EPA final rule published on July 15, 2015
(80 FR 41566), which revised the 1988 UST regulations and the 1988
State program approval (SPA) regulations (2015 Federal Revisions). As
required by 40 CFR 281.20, the State Application contains the
following: A transmittal letter from the Governor requesting approval,
a description of the program and operating procedures, a demonstration
of the State's procedures to ensure adequate enforcement, a Memorandum
of Agreement outlining the roles and responsibilities of the EPA and
the implementing agency, a statement of certification from the Attorney
General, and copies of all relevant state statutes and regulations. We
have reviewed the State Application and determined that the revisions
to Oregon's UST program are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the corresponding Federal requirements in subpart C of
40 CFR part 281, and that the Oregon program provides for adequate
enforcement of compliance with these requirements (40 CFR 281.11(b)).
Therefore, the EPA grants Oregon final approval to operate its UST
program with the changes described in the program revision
[[Page 36001]]
application, and as outlined below in Section I.G of this document.
C. What is the effect of this action on the regulated community?
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations being approved by this rule
are already in effect in the State of Oregon, and are not changed by
this action. This action merely approves the existing State regulations
as meeting the Federal requirements and renders them federally
enforceable.
D. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and we
anticipate no adverse comment. Oregon did not receive any comments
during its comment period when the rules and regulations being
considered in this document were proposed at the State level.
E. What happens if the EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
Along with this direct final rule, the EPA is publishing a separate
document in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register
that serves as the proposal to approve the State's UST program
revisions, and provides an opportunity for public comment. If EPA
receives comments that oppose this approval, then the EPA will withdraw
this direct final rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register
before it becomes effective. The EPA will base any further decision on
approval of the State Application after considering all comments
received during the comment period. The EPA will then address all
public comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this approval, then
you must do so at this time.
F. For what has Oregon previously been approved?
On September 16, 2011, the EPA finalized a rule approving the UST
program that Oregon proposed to administer in lieu of the Federal UST
program. On April 30, 2012, the EPA codified the provisions of the
approved Oregon program that are part of the underground storage tank
program under Subtitle I of RCRA, and therefore are subject to the
EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities under RCRA Sections 9005
and 9006, 42 U.S.C. 6991d and 6991e, and other applicable statutory and
regulatory provisions.
G. What changes are we approving with this action and what standards do
we use for review?
In order to be approved, each state program application must meet
the general requirements in 40 CFR 281.11, and specific requirements in
40 CFR part 281, subpart B (Components of a Program Application);
subpart C (Criteria for No Less Stringent); and subpart D (Adequate
Enforcement of Compliance). This is also true for proposed revisions to
approved state programs.
As more fully described below, the State has made the changes to
its approved UST program to reflect the 2015 Federal Revisions. The EPA
is approving the State's changes because they are equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal UST program and
because the EPA has confirmed that the Oregon UST program will continue
to provide for adequate enforcement of compliance with these
requirements as described in 40 CFR 281.11(b) and part 281, subpart D,
after this approval.
The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is the lead
implementing agency for the UST program in Oregon, except in Indian
country.
The DEQ continues to have broad statutory authority to regulate the
installation, operation, maintenance, and closure of USTs, as well as
UST releases under Oregon Statutes (2017), Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste
and Hazardous Materials II, Sections 605-995. The Oregon UST Program
gets its enforcement authority from the powers and duties of the DEQ
found in Chapter 466, Section 015. Under Chapter 466, Sections 765(3),
765(5), and 805(a) the DEQ is authorized to require an owner to furnish
records, conduct monitoring or testing, and provide access to tanks.
The DEQ is authorized to issue, modify, suspend, revoke or refuse to
renew a permit under Chapter 466, Section 775. Penalties for non-
compliance may be assessed under Chapter 466, Section 837(1).
Specific authorities to regulate the installation, operation,
maintenance, and closure of USTs, as well as UST releases are found
under Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR), as amended effective June 1,
2018, Chapter 340, Division 150, Underground Storage Tank Rules; DEQ
may prohibit delivery to any UST identified by DEQ as ineligible for
delivery under OAR 340-150-0020(1), 0080, 0150, 0152, and 0163;
reporting and recordkeeping requirements are found under OAR 340-150-
0135. Procedures for receipt, evaluation, retention and investigation
of required records and reports are under OAR 340-150-0135. The
aforementioned statutory sections and regulations satisfy the
requirements of 40 CFR 281.40 and 281.41.
Through a Memorandum of Agreement between the State of Oregon and
the EPA, effective September 24, 2019, the State maintains procedures
for receiving and ensuring proper consideration of information about
violations submitted by the public. The State agrees to comply with
public participation provisions contained in 40 CFR 281.42 including
the provision that the State will not oppose intervention under Oregon
Rules of Civil Procedure 33C, its analogue to Federal Rule 24(a)(2), on
the grounds that the applicant's interest is adequately represented by
the State. Oregon has met the public participation requirements found
in 40 CFR 281.42.
To qualify for final approval, revisions to a state's program must
be ``equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent'' than the
2015 Federal Revisions. In the 2015 Federal Revisions the EPA addressed
UST systems deferred in the 1988 UST regulations, and added, among
other things, new operation and maintenance requirements; secondary
containment requirements for new and replaced tanks and piping;
operator training requirements; and a requirement to ensure UST system
compatibility before storing certain biofuel blends. In addition, the
EPA removed past deferrals for emergency generator tanks, field
constructed tanks, and airport hydrant systems. The EPA analyzes
revisions to approved state programs pursuant to the criteria found in
40 CFR 281.30 through 281.39.
The DEQ has revised its regulations to help ensure that the State's
UST program revisions are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the 2015 Federal Revisions.
Title 40 CFR 281.39 describes the state operator training
requirements that must be met to be considered equivalent to,
consistent with, and no less stringent than Federal requirements.
Oregon did not incorporate by reference Federal requirements for
operator training, and has promulgated and is implementing its own
operator training provisions under OAR 340-150-0200, 0210, and 0315.
After a thorough review, the EPA has determined that Oregon's operator
training requirements are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than federal requirements.
As part of the State Application the Oregon Attorney General
certified that the State revisions meet the
[[Page 36002]]
requirements ``equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent''
criteria in 40 CFR 281.30 through 281.39. The EPA is relying on this
certification in addition to the analysis submitted by the State in
making our determination.
H. Where are the revised rules different from the Federal rules?
Broader in Scope Provisions
Where an approved state program has a greater scope of coverage
than required by Federal law, the additional coverage is not part of
the federally-approved program and is not federally enforceable (40 CFR
281.12(a)(3)(ii)). The following statutory and regulatory requirements
are considered broader in coverage than the Federal program as these
State-only regulations are not required by Federal regulation and are
implemented by the State in addition to the federally approved program:
Heating oil tanks are regulated under OAR Chapter 340 Division 177.
DEQ's requirement to report and clean up releases from underground
heating oil tanks (HOTs) is broader in scope. Additionally, DEQ
encourages voluntary decommissioning of HOTs and licenses UST and HOT
service providers and supervisors. These programs are also broader in
scope than the federal program.
Tank owners who install, decommission or test their own tanks are
required to take the same proficiency examination as UST supervisors to
ensure that they have the technical knowledge to do the work safely and
correctly.
The universe of ``suspected releases that trigger reporting,
investigation and confirmation'' under OAR 340-150-0500 may be broader
than the Federal rule, including discovery of a release into a
secondary containment area and monitoring results or alarms from
release detection systems.
The State has provided for release response and corrective action
in its remedial action rules under OAR Chapter 340, Division 122. As a
general matter, the universe of regulated persons is broader under the
state rules than under the federal rules. The obligations in Division
122 are imposed upon ``the responsible person,'' a term that appears to
encompass a broader class of persons than the term ``owner and
operator''.
The State standard for system cleaning upon permanent closure is
the same as that found at 40 CFR 280.71(b), except that the State
requirements apply to the UST system as a whole, whereas the Federal
requirements apply to tanks. If the permittee proposes to close the UST
in place and fill it, then the permittee must submit a site assessment
plan. Closure cannot begin until the plan is approved by the DEQ.
The operation and maintenance of corrosion protection systems apply
to all USTs and piping. The Federal rules apply only to steel UST
systems with corrosion protection.
More Stringent Provisions
Where an approved state program includes requirements that are
considered more stringent than required by Federal law, the more
stringent requirements become part of the federally approved program.
(40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii)).
The following statutory and regulatory requirements are considered
more stringent than the Federal program, and on approval, they become
part of the federally approved program and are federally enforceable:
The State rules do not allow the use of metal tanks or piping
without corrosion protection as allowed in 40 CFR 280.20(a)(4) and
(b)(3), which states that no corrosion protection is required for metal
tanks and piping installed at a site that have been determined by a
corrosion expert not to be corrosive enough to cause either the tank or
the piping to have a release due to corrosion during its operating
life. Because the State does not allow the alternative to corrosion
protection found in 40 CFR 280.20(a)(4), the State rules do not have a
recordkeeping requirement that corresponds with that in 40 CFR
280.34(b)(1). OAR 340-150-0320.
The State rules do not allow for the use of alternative types of
tanks and piping determined to be equally protective in preventing
releases as those otherwise identified in the rules, as allowed in 40
CFR 280.20(a)(5) and (b)(4).
The State rules allow only one mode of certifying the installation.
The certification of compliance must be signed by the owner, permittee
and a service provider licensed by the department, and must certify
that the system has been installed in compliance with the required
methods and standards. OAR 340-150-0160.
The State rules require used USTs that have been removed from the
ground to be certified by a UST manufacturer in writing before being
reused. OAR 340-150-0302(2).
The owner and permittee must notify DEQ at least 30 days before
beginning installation of a UST system. (DEQ may allow a shorter period
on a case-by-case basis) OAR 340-150-0160(2).
The owner and permittee must notify DEQ of the confirmed time and
date of the installation of the UST system at least three working days
before beginning the installation. DEQ may also request additional
notifications. OAR 340-150-0160(3).
DEQ's installation checklist required upon completion of the
installation requires certification of compliance with required
installation standards and methods, and the standards for spill and
overfill prevention, corrosion protection release detection and
financial responsibility as is required by 40 CFR 280.22. DEQ's
installation checklist also requires the owner and permittee to provide
substantially more information than appears to be required by 40 CFR
280.22(e) and (f).
Repaired tanks and piping must be tested after completion of the
repairs and before operation. OAR 340-150-0350(3)(a) and (4). The
Federal rules allow an UST system to return to service providing
testing is conducted within 30 days of repair.
Any test failures must be reported to DEQ. OAR 340-150-0163(1)(c)
and (e); OAR 340-150-0325(4); OAR 340-150-0350(3)(a) and (4).
Repaired tanks, except tanks repaired by lining, must be certified
as meeting the performance standards by the original manufacturer or,
if unavailable, another manufacturer of the same type of tank. OAR-340-
0350.
The State requires an investigation of the magnitude and extent of
soil and groundwater contamination if not otherwise fully identified in
the course of the initial site characterization. OAR 340-122-0240. This
requirement is more stringent than those under 40 CFR 280.65, to the
extent that the additional investigation in 40 CFR 280.65 is triggered
only if groundwater wells have been affected, free product is found to
need recovery, soils may be in contact with groundwater or the
implementing agency requests an investigation.
The permittee must perform a site assessment before permanent
closure or change in service. OAR 340-150-0168 and OAR 340-150-0180.
The State requirements are more stringent in that the owner or
permittee, which is using groundwater or vapor monitoring in accordance
with state rules, cannot satisfy the requirements of the site
assessment by relying on their release detection method in place at the
time of closure as allowed by 40 CFR 280.72(a).
The rules in OAR Division 150 apply to all UST systems taken out of
operation between January 1, 1974 and May 1, 1988, if not emptied and
cleaned as required by OAR 340-150-0168(4), and to all UST systems
taken out of operation before January 1, 1974, if not empty. OAR 340-
150-0006(2). This
[[Page 36003]]
requirement is more stringent than the Federal standard in 40 CFR
280.73, which states that the owner and operator of an UST system
permanently closed before December 22, 1988, must assess the excavation
zone and close the UST system in accordance with the subpart if
releases from the UST may, in the judgment of the implementing agency,
pose a current or potential threat to human health and the environment.
The State rules do not include the options for overfill prevention
equipment found in 40 CFR 280.20(c)(1)(ii)(C) and (c)(2)(i). In 40 CFR
280.20(c)(1)(ii)(C), Federal rules allow an overfill device that can
restrict flow 30 minutes prior to overfilling, alert the transfer
operator with a high-level alarm one minute before overfilling, or
automatically shut off flow into the tank so that none of the fittings
located on top of the tank are exposed to product due to overfilling.
In 40 CFR 280.20(c)(2)(i), Federal rules state that owners and
operators are not required to use the spill and overfill prevention
equipment specified in paragraph (c)(1) of the section if alternative
equipment is used that is determined by the implementing agency to be
no less protective of human health and the environment than the
equipment specified in 40 CFR 280.20(c)(1)(i) or (ii).
I. How does this action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Oregon?
The EPA's approval of Oregon's Program does not extend to Indian
country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country generally includes
lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian
reservations located within Oregon: Burns Paiute, Grande Ronde,
Klamath, Siletz, Umatilla and Warm Springs Reservations; any land held
in trust by the United States for an Indian tribe; and any other areas
that are ``Indian country'' within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151. Any
lands removed from an Indian reservation status by Federal court action
are not considered reservation lands even if located within the
exterior boundaries of an Indian reservation. The EPA will retain
responsibilities under RCRA for underground storage tanks in Indian
country. Therefore, this action has no effect in Indian country. See 40
CFR 281.12(a)(2).
II. Codification
A. What is codification?
Codification is the process of placing a state's statutes and
regulations that comprise the state's approved UST program into the
CFR. Section 9004(b) of RCRA, as amended, allows the EPA to approve
State UST programs to operate in lieu of the Federal program. The EPA
codifies its authorization of state programs in 40 CFR part 282 and
incorporates by reference state regulations that the EPA will enforce
under Sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA and any other applicable statutory
provisions. The incorporation by reference of state authorized programs
in the CFR should substantially enhance the public's ability to discern
the current status of the approved state program and state requirements
that can be federally enforced. This effort provides clear notice to
the public of the scope of the approved program in each state.
B. What is the history of codification of Oregon's UST program?
The EPA incorporated by reference and codified Oregon's then-
approved UST program in 40 CFR 282.87, effective June 29, 2012 (77 FR
25368, April 30, 2012). Through this action, the EPA is incorporating
by reference and codifying Oregon's State program in 40 CFR 282.87 to
include the approved revisions.
C. What codification decisions have we made in this rule?
In this rule, we are finalizing the regulatory text that
incorporates by reference the federally authorized Oregon UST Program.
In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are finalizing
the incorporation by reference of the Oregon rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 282 set forth below. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10 office (see the ADDRESSES
section of this preamble for more information).
One purpose of this Federal Register document is to codify Oregon's
approved UST program. The codification reflects the State program that
would be in effect at the time the EPA's approved revisions to the
Oregon UST program addressed in this direct final rule become final.
If, however, the EPA receives substantive comment on the rule then this
codification will not take effect, and the State rules that are
approved after the EPA considers public comment will be codified
instead. By codifying the approved Oregon program and by amending the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the public will more easily be able
to discern the status of the federally-approved requirements of the
Oregon program.
The EPA is incorporating by reference the Oregon approved UST
program in 40 CFR 282.87. Section 282.87(d)(1)(i)(A) and (B)
incorporate by reference for enforcement purposes the State's relevant
statutes and regulations. Section 282.87 also references the Attorney
General's Statement, Demonstration of Adequate Enforcement Procedures,
the Program Description, and the Memorandum of Agreement, which are
approved as part of the UST program under Subtitle I of RCRA.
D. What is the effect of EPA's codification of the federally authorized
State UST Program on enforcement?
The EPA retains the authority under Sections 9003(h), 9005 and 9006
of Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d and 6991e, and other
applicable statutory and regulatory provisions to undertake corrective
action, inspections, and enforcement actions, and to issue orders in
approved states. If the EPA determines it will take such actions in
Oregon, the EPA will rely on Federal sanctions, Federal inspection
authorities, and other Federal procedures rather than the state
analogs. Therefore, though the EPA has approved the State procedures
listed in 40 CFR 282.87(d)(1)(i), the EPA is not incorporating by
reference Oregon's procedural and enforcement authorities.
E. What State provisions are not part of the codification?
The public also needs to be aware that some provisions of the
State's UST program are not part of the federally approved State
program. Such provisions are not part of the RCRA Subtitle I program
because they are ``broader in coverage'' than Subtitle I of RCRA. Title
40 CFR 281.12(a)(3)(ii) states that where an approved State program has
provisions that are broader in coverage than the Federal program, those
provisions are not a part of the federally approved program. As a
result, State provisions which are ``broader in coverage'' than the
Federal program are not incorporated by reference for purposes of
enforcement in part 282. Title 40 CFR 282.87(d)(1)(iii) lists for
reference and clarity the Oregon statutory and regulatory provisions
which are ``broader in coverage'' than the Federal program and which
are not, therefore, part of the approved program being codified in this
rule. Provisions that are ``broader in coverage'' cannot be enforced by
EPA; the State, however, will continue to implement and enforce such
provisions under State law.
[[Page 36004]]
III. Statutory and Executive Order (E.O.) Reviews
This action only applies to Oregon's UST Program requirements
pursuant to RCRA Section 9004 and imposes no requirements other than
those imposed by State law. It complies with applicable EOs and
statutory provisions as follows:
A. Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February
3, 2017) regulatory action because actions such as this final approval
of Oregon's revised underground storage tank program under RCRA are
exempted under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.).
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Because this action approves and codifies pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-
1538). For the same reason, this action also does not significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, Aug. 10, 1999), because it merely approves and codifies state
requirements as part of the State RCRA Underground Storage Tank Program
without altering the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA.
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, Apr. 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant, as
defined in Executive Order 12866, and because the EPA does not believe
the environmental health or safety risks addressed by this action
present a disproportionate risk to children.
F. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as
defined under Executive Order 12866.
G. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Under RCRA Section 9004(b), the EPA grants a state's application
for approval as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA, when it
reviews a state approval application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct.
I. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
The EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, Mar.
15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued
under the executive order.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. Because this rule approves pre-
existing state rules which are at least equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than existing Federal requirements, and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law, and there
are no anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental
effects, the rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). However,
this action will be effective September 24, 2019 because it is a direct
final rule.
Authority: This rule is issued under the authority of Sections
2002(a), 7004(b), and 9004, 9005 and 9006 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6974(b), and 6991c,
6991d, and 6991e.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 282
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
[[Page 36005]]
reference, State program approval, Underground storage tanks.
Dated: June 27, 2019.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
part 282 as follows:
PART 282--APPROVED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 282 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6912, 6991c, 6991d, and 6991e.
0
2. Revise Sec. 282.87 to read as follows:
Sec. 282.87 Oregon State-Administered Program.
(a) The State of Oregon is approved to administer and enforce an
underground storage tank program in lieu of the Federal program under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(RCRA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The State's program, as
administered by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ),
was approved by EPA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and part 281 of this
chapter. The EPA published the notice of final determination approving
the Oregon underground storage tank base program effective on September
16, 2011. A subsequent program revision application was approved by the
EPA and became effective on September 24, 2019.
(b) Oregon has primary responsibility for administering and
enforcing its federally approved underground storage tank program.
However, the EPA retains the authority to exercise its corrective
action, inspection, and enforcement authorities under Sections 9003(h),
9005, and 9006 of Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d and
6991e, as well as under any other applicable statutory and regulatory
provisions.
(c) To retain program approval, Oregon must revise its approved
program to adopt new changes to the Federal Subtitle I program which
make it more stringent, in accordance with section 9004 of RCRA, 42
U.S.C. 6991c, and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If Oregon obtains
approval for the revised requirements pursuant to Section 9004 of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991c, then the newly approved statutory and regulatory
provisions will be added to this subpart and notification of any change
will be published in the Federal Register.
(d) Oregon has final approval for the following elements of its
program application originally submitted to the EPA and approved
effective September 16, 2011, and the program revision application
approved by the EPA, effective on September 24, 2019:
(1) State statutes and regulations. (i) The materials cited in this
paragraph (d)(1) are incorporated by reference as part of the
underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq., with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other
than that specified in this section, the EPA must publish a document in
the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public.
All approved material is available for inspection at EPA Region 10,
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, phone number (206)
553-6693. Copies of Oregon's program application may be obtained from
the Underground Storage Tank Program, Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality, 811 SW Sixth Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97204.
All approved material is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of the material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(A) Oregon Statutory Requirements Applicable to the Underground
Storage Tank Program, June 2018.
(B) Oregon Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the Underground
Storage Tank Program, June 2018.
(ii) The EPA considered the following statutes and regulations in
evaluating the State program, but did not incorporate them by
reference.
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 183, Administrative Procedures
Act, 2017, insofar as the provisions and procedures apply to the
underground storage tank program.
(2) Chapter 465, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials I (Removal
or Remedial Action: Sections 465.200-465.482 and 465.900), insofar as
these provisions apply to matters involving an ``underground storage
tank'' as that term is defined in ORS 466.706(21), as limited by the
exclusions listed in ORS 466.710, except that the term does not include
a tank used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the premises
where stored. The following Sections are part of the approved State
program, although not incorporated by reference herein for enforcement
purposes: Sections 465.205 through 465.250, 465.257 through 465.300,
465.310 through 465.335, 465.400 through 465.435, 465.445 through
465.455 and 465.900.
(3) Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials II (Oil
Storage Tanks: Sections 466.706-466.920 and Sections 466.990-466.995),
insofar as these provisions apply to matters involving an ``underground
storage tank'' as that term is defined in ORS 466.706(21), as limited
by the exclusions listed in ORS 466.710, except that the term does not
include a tank used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the
premises where stored. The following Sections are part of the approved
State program, although not incorporated by reference herein for
enforcement purposes: Sections 466.715 through 466.735, 466.746,
466.760, 466.775 through 466.780, 466.791 through 466.810, 466.820,
466.830 through 466.845, 466.901 through 466.920 and 466.994 through
466.995.
(4) Chapter 468 Environmental Quality Generally, insofar as these
provisions apply to matters involving an ``underground storage tank''
as that term is defined in ORS 466.706(21), as limited by the
exclusions listed in ORS 466.710, except that the term does not include
a tank used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the premises
where stored. The following Sections are part of the approved State
program, although not incorporated by reference herein for enforcement
purposes: Sections 468.005 through 468.050, 468.090 through 468.140 and
468.963.
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 11: Section
340-11-0545.
(2) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 12: Sections
340-012-0026 through 340-012-0053, 340-012-0067 (with the exception of
subparagraphs (1)(k) and (l) and (2)(g) through (j)), 340-012-0074
(with the exception of subparagraph (1)(g)) and 340-012-0170 insofar as
this applies to violations involving an underground storage tank.
(3) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 122:
Sections 340-122-0074 through 340-122-0079 and 340-122-0130 through
340-122-0140.
(4) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 142: Section
340-142-0120.
(5) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 150:
Sections 340-150-0150 through 340-150-0152, 340-150-0250, 340-150-0600
through 340-150-0620.
(6) Oregon Code of Civil Procedure 33C.
(7) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 690, Division 240, insofar
as
[[Page 36006]]
these provisions apply to matters involving an ``underground storage
tank'' as that term is defined in ORS 466.706(21), as limited by the
exclusions listed in ORS 466.710, except that the term does not include
a tank used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the premises
where stored. The following Sections are part of the approved State
program, although not incorporated by reference herein for enforcement
purposes: Sections 690-240-0015, 690-240-0020, 690-240-0055 through
690-240-0340 and 690-240-0560 through 690-240-0640.
(iii) The following specifically identified sections and rules
applicable to the Oregon underground storage tank program that are
broader in scope than the Federal program, are not part of the approved
program, and are not incorporated by reference herein for enforcement
purposes:
(A) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Chapter 465, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials I (Removal
or Remedial Action): Sections 465.305; 465.340 through 465.391;
465.440; and 465.475 through 465.482.
(2) Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials II (Oil
Storage Tanks): Sections 466.750; 466.783 through 466.787; 466.858
through 466.882; and 466.990 through 466.992).
(3) Chapter 468, Environmental Quality Generally: Sections 468.055
through 468.089.
(B) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340: Divisions 160, 162,
163, 170, 177 and 178.
(2) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 837, Division 40.
(2) Statement of legal authority. The Attorney General Statement, a
letter signed on October 12, 2018, though not incorporated by
reference, is referenced as part of the approved underground storage
tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(3) Demonstration of procedures for adequate enforcement. The
``Demonstration of Procedures for Adequate Enforcement'' submitted as
part of the application for approval on October 19, 2018, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
(4) Program description. The program description and any other
material submitted as part of the original application on October 19,
2018, though not incorporated by reference, are referenced as part of
the approved underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.
(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region 10 and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,
signed by the EPA Regional Administrator on March 19, 2019, though not
incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved
underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6991 et seq.
0
3. Appendix A to part 282 is amended by revising the entry for Oregon
to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 282--State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in
Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations
* * * * *
Oregon
(a) The statutory provisions include:
(1) Chapter 465, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials I
(Removal or Remedial Action Sections 465.200 through 465.425):
465.200 Definitions for ORS 465.200 to 465.425 (except for Sections
465.200(5) through (11) and (17) defining terms contained in the dry
cleaning requirements; (13) ``facility'' insofar as it applies to a
facility that is not an underground storage tank; (16) ``hazardous
substance'' insofar as it applies to hazardous wastes and any
substance that is not otherwise defined as a hazardous substance
pursuant to section 101(14) of the Federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act or that is
not oil; (28) ``underground storage tank'' insofar as it includes
any tank or piping that is excluded under ORS 466.710 and also any
tank used to store heating oil for consumptive use on the premises
where stored.)
465.255 Strict liability for remedial action costs for injury or
destruction of natural resource; limited exclusions (except insofar
as this includes a person who is not an owner or operator of an
underground storage tank and except insofar as the exclusions would
exclude persons who would be liable under Section 9003(h)(6) of
RCRA).
(2) Chapter 466, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials II (Oil
Storage Tanks):
466.706 Definitions for ORS 466.706 to 466.882 and 466.994 (except
for the following definitions: Section 466.706(17) ``regulated
substance'' insofar as it would include substances designated by the
commission under subsection (c) that are not included under
subsections (a) and (b) of this definition; (21) ``underground
storage tank'' insofar as it includes any tank or piping that is
excluded under ORS 466.710, and any tank used to store heating oil
for consumptive use on the premises where stored.)
466.710 Application of ORS 466.706 to 466.882 and 466.994
466.740 Noncomplying installation prohibited
466.743 Training on operation, maintenance and testing; rules
466.765 Duty of owner or permittee of underground storage tank
466.770 Corrective action required on contaminated site
466.815 Financial responsibility of owner or permittee; rules;
legislative review
466.825 Strict liability of owner or permittee
(b) The regulatory provisions include:
(1) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 122
insofar as the following rules apply to a release from an
underground storage tank, excluding tanks used to store heating oil
for consumptive use on the premises where stored.
340-122-0010 Purpose
340-122-0030 Scope and Applicability
340-122-0040 Standards
340-122-0047 Generic remedies
340-122-0050 Activities
340-122-0070 Removal
340-122-0071 Site Evaluation
340-122-0072 Preliminary Assessments
340-122-0073 Confirmation of Release
340-122-0080 Remedial Investigation
340-122-0084 Risk Assessment
340-122-0085 Feasibility Study
340-122-0090 Selection or Approval of the Remedial Action
340-122-0100 Public Notice and Participation
340-122-0110 Administrative Record
340-122-0115 Definitions insofar as the definition applies to an
underground storage tank, excluding tanks used to store heating oil
for consumptive use on the premises where stored
340-122-0120 Security Interest Exemption
340-122-0205 Purpose
340-122-0210 Definitions except insofar as the definition of
``responsible person'' includes a person who does not own or operate
an underground storage tank
340-122-0215 Scope and Applicability
340-122-0217 Requirements and Remediation Options
340-122-0218 Sampling and Analysis
340-122-0220 Initial Response
340-122-0225 Initial Abatement Measures and Site Check
340-122-0230 Initial Site Characterization
340-122-0235 Free Product Removal
340-122-0240 Investigation for Magnitude and Extent of Contamination
340-122-0243 Low-Impact Sites
340-122-0244 Risk-Based Concentrations
340-122-0250 Corrective Action Plan
340-122-0252 Generic Remedies
340-122-0260 Public Participation
340-122-0320 Soil Matrix Cleanup Options
340-122-0325 Evaluation of Matrix Cleanup Level
340-122-0330 Evaluation Parameters
340-122-0335 Numeric Soil Cleanup Standards
340-122-0340 Sample Number and Location
340-122-0345 Sample Collection Methods
340-122-0355 Evaluation of Analytical Results
340-122-0360 Reporting Requirements
(2) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 142
insofar as the following rules apply to a release from an
underground storage tank, excluding tanks used to store heating oil
for consumptive use on the premises where stored.
340-142-0001 Purpose and Scope
[[Page 36007]]
340-142-0005 Definitions as Used in This Division Unless Otherwise
Specified
340-142-0030 Emergency Action
340-142-0040 Required Reporting
340-142-0050 Reportable Quantities
340-142-0060 Cleanup Standards
340-142-0070 Approval Required for Use of Chemicals
340-142-0080 Disposal of Recovered Spill Materials
340-142-0090 Cleanup Report
340-142-0100 Sampling/Testing Procedures
340-142-0130 Incident Management and Emergency Operations
(3) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 150.
340-150-0001 Purpose
340-150-0006 Applicability and General Requirements
340-150-0008 Exemptions and Deferrals
340-150-0010 Definitions
340-150-0020 UST General Permit Registration Certificate Required
except insofar as this provision applies to a person who does not
own or operate an underground storage tank and except insofar as the
payment of fees is required
340-150-0021 Termination of Temporary Permits
340-150-0052 Modification of Registration Certificates for Changes
in Ownership and Permittee except insofar as the payment of fees is
required
340-150-0080 Denial, Suspension or Revocation of General Permit
Registration Certificates except insofar as this provision applies
to a person who does not own or operate an underground storage tank
340-150-0102 Termination of Registration Certificates
340-150-0110 UST General Permit Registration, Annual Compliance and
Other Fees except insofar as the payment of fees is required
340-150-0135 General Requirements for Owners and Permittees
340-150-0137 UST Systems with Field-Constructed Tanks and Airport
Hydrat Fuel Distribution Systems
340-150-0140 Requirements for Sellers of USTs
340-150-0156 Performance of UST Services by Owners or Permittees
340-150-0160 General Permit Requirements for Installing an UST
System except insofar as this provision applies to a person who does
not own or operate an underground storage tank
340-150-0163 General Permit Requirements for Operating an UST System
except insofar as the payment of fees is required
340-150-0167 General Permit Requirements for Temporary Closure of an
UST System except insofar as the payment of fees is required
340-150-0168 General Permit Requirements for Decommissioning an UST
System by Permanent Closure except insofar as this provision applies
to a person who does not own or operate an underground storage tank
and except insofar as the payment of fees is required
340-150-0180 Site Assessment Requirements for Permanent Closure or
Change-in-Service
340-150-0200 Training Requirements for UST System Operators and
Emergency Response Information
340-150-0210 Training Requirements for UST Operators
340-150-0302 Installation of Used USTs
340-150-0310 Spill and Overfill Prevention Equipment and
Requirements
340-150-0315 Priodic operation and maintenance walkthrough
inspections
340-150-0320 Corrosion Protection Performance Standards for USTs and
Piping
340-150-0325 Operation and Maintenance of Corrosion Protection
340-150-0350 UST System Repairs
340-150-0352 UST System Modifications and Additions
340-150-0354 UST System Replacements
340-150-0360 Requirements for Internally Lined USTs
340-150-0400 General Release Detection Requirements for Petroleum
UST Systems
340-150-0410 Release Detection Requirements and Methods for
Underground Piping
340-150-0420 Release Detection Requirements for Hazardous Substance
UST Systems
340-150-0430 Inventory Control Method of Release Detection
340-150-0435 Statistical Inventory Reconciliation Method of Release
Detection
340-150-0440 Manual Tank Gauging Release Detection Method
340-150-0445 Tank Tightness Testing for Release Detection and
Investigation
340-150-0450 Automatic Tank Gauging Release Detection Method
340-150-0465 Interstitial Monitoring Release Detection Method
340-150-0470 Other Methods of Release Detection
340-150-0500 Reporting Suspected Releases
340-150-0510 Suspected Release Investigation and Confirmation Steps
340-150-0520 Investigation Due to Off Site Impacts
340-150-0540 Applicability to Previously Closed UST Systems
340-150-0550 Definitions for OAR 340-150-0555 and 340-150-0560
340-150-0555 Compliance Dates for USTs and Piping
340-150-0560 Upgrading Requirements for Existing UST Systems
(4) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340, Division 151
340-151-0001 Purpose
340-151-0010 Scope and Applicability
340-151-0015 Adoption and Applicability of United States
Environmental Protection Agency Regulations
340-151-0020 Definitions
340-151-0025 Oregon-Specific Financial Responsibility Requirements
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-15311 Filed 7-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P