Interlocking Officers and Directors; Requirements for Applicants and Holders, 35824-35825 [2019-15715]
Download as PDF
35824
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Parts 45 and 46
[Docket No. RM18–15–001; Order No. 856–
A]
Interlocking Officers and Directors;
Requirements for Applicants and
Holders
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Order on rehearing.
AGENCY:
In this order on rehearing, the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
grants in part and denies in part
rehearing and clarification regarding
certain revisions to its regulations
related to interlocking officers and
directors.
SUMMARY:
II. Discussion
A. Sufficiency of Form No. 561 for
Reporting Changes in Position
This order on rehearing will
become effective September 23, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lindsay Orphanides (Technical
Information), Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
8372, lindsay.orphanides@ferc.gov
Mary Ellen Stefanou (Legal
Information), Office of the General
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
8989, mary.stefanou@ferc.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Final Rule
3. In Order No. 856, the Commission
amended §§ 45.4 and 45.5 of the
Commission’s regulations to state that
supplemental applications and notices
of change need not be filed in the case
of a person already authorized to hold
interlocks identified in § 45.9(a) who
may assume new or different positions
that are still among those identified by
§ 45.9(a). The Commission stated that
such changes in positions among related
public utilities are already reported in
the annual Form No. 561s,2 and separate
filings under § 45.4 or § 45.5 are
unnecessary.
I. Background
2. Request for Rehearing
4. El Paso seeks clarification that
supplemental applications and notices
of change need not be filed in the case
of a person already authorized to hold
interlocks with respect to all interlocks
authorized under part 45 generally, and
is not limited solely to interlocks
identified in § 45.9. El Paso states that,
when an officer or director holds a new
or different interlocking position within
any interlock authorized under part 45,
it is reported in Form No. 561. El Paso
asserts that ‘‘the Commission’s rationale
for its clarification in Order No. 856 that
Form No. 561 reporting is sufficient,
and that supplemental applications and
changes in notice need not be filed if/
when an officer or director assumes a
new or different position within the
same interlocking companies, applies
DATES:
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Commission’s regulations and stated
that applicants do not need to list in
their applications public utilities that do
not have officers or directors; (5) revised
the Commission’s regulations with
regard to public utilities owned by a
natural person; (6) created an exemption
from the filing requirements for
interlocking positions of 90 days or less;
and (7) removed § 46.2(b) of the
Commission’s regulations, which
contained definitions and phrases now
rendered obsolete.
2. On March 25, 2019, El Paso Electric
Company (El Paso) filed a request for
rehearing of Order No. 856, seeking
clarification or rehearing of two
revisions made by the final rule. We
address these issues below.
1. On February 21, 2019, the
Commission issued Order No. 856.1
Order No. 856 revised parts 45 and 46
of the Commission’s regulations related
to interlocking officers and directors to
clarify and update the requirements for
both applicants and holders. In
particular, Order No. 856: (1) Updated
the Commission’s regulations to reflect
statutory changes to the circumstances
in which an applicant who would
otherwise require Commission
authorization to hold an interlocking
position need not do so; (2) revised the
Commission’s regulations and clarified
the Commission’s position on late-filed
applications and informational reports;
(3) revised the Commission’s regulations
and clarified that an interlock holder is
not required to file a notice of change
when merely changing positions within
a holding company; (4) revised the
1 Interlocking Officers and Directors;
Requirements for Applicants and Holders, Order
No. 856, 84 FR 7274 (March 4, 2019), 166 FERC
¶ 61,119 (2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jul 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
2 18 CFR 131.31 (Annual Report of Interlocking
Positions). The Form No. 561 is an annual report
of information detailing electric public utility
officer and board of director positions that officers
and directors held within and outside their
affiliated public utility at any point during the
preceding year.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
equally to any interlock authorized
under [p]art 45, and not merely to an
interlock identified in [§ ] 45.9.’’ 3
5. El Paso states that, in the
alternative, it seeks rehearing of Order
No. 856 and requests that the
Commission grant equal treatment to all
interlocks authorized under part 45, on
the basis that it is sufficient for changes
in position for all authorized interlocks
to be reported annually in Form No.
561, without the need for the filing of
a supplemental application under § 45.4
or a notice of change under § 45.5.4
3. Commission Determination
6. We deny El Paso’s request for
clarification or rehearing. The
Commission’s rationale for the change
adopted in Order No. 856 that
supplemental applications and notices
of change need not be filed in the case
of a person already authorized to hold
interlocks identified in § 45.9(a) stated
that ‘‘such changes in positions among
related public utilities are already
reported in the annual Form No. 561s,
and separate filings under § 45.4 or
§ 45.5 are unnecessary.’’ 5 However, that
rationale does not apply equally to ‘‘any
interlock authorized under [p]art 45.’’ 6
The Commission has recognized a
difference between holding interlocks
among two or more commonly-owned
or -controlled public utilities, and
holding an interlock between, for
example, a public utility and an
electrical equipment supplier. Interlocks
that fall under § 45.2 and are not
between two or more commonly-owned
or -controlled public utilities (and
therefore are outside the scope of
§ 45.9(a)) are reviewed by the
Commission so that the Commission can
be sure that the ‘‘evils to be eliminated
by the enactment of section 305(b)’’ 7 are
not present. By contrast, for interlocks
that fall under § 45.9(a)’s automatic
3 El
Paso Request for Rehearing at 4.
(internal citations omitted).
5 Order No. 856, 166 FERC ¶ 61,119 at P 12
(emphasis added).
6 El Paso Request for Rehearing at 4.
7 James S. Pignatelli, 111 FERC ¶ 61,496, at P 12
(2005) (quoting John Edward Aldred, 2 FPC 247,
261 (1940)). The ‘‘evils to be eliminated by the
enactment of section 305(b),’’ include: ‘‘[. . .] (3)
the lack of arm’s-length dealings between public
utilities and organizations furnishing financial
services or electrical equipment; (4) the
employment of dummy directors designated solely
for the purpose of executing the order of those in
control, and nominal directors who give little time
and attention to the affairs of the companies; and
(5) violations of laws, ethics, and good business
practices by those holding such interlocking
positions whereby such relationship is employed
for their own benefit or profit, or for the benefit or
profit of any other person or persons and to the
detriment of the companies, their security holders
or the public interest.’’ Id.; accord Hatch v. FERC,
654 F.2d 825, 831–32 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
4 Id.
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
authorization, the Commission has
found that the evils to be eliminated by
the enactment of Federal Power Act
(FPA) section 305(b) are not present
because the potential for abuse would
be unlikely to result from such
interlocks.8 Therefore, we will continue
to require an officer or director who
seeks a new or different interlocking
position, or leaves a position, with
entities covered by § 45.2 and not
subject to the automatic authorization of
§ 45.9(a) to file supplemental
applications and notices of change so
that the Commission may review the
new or different position to ensure that
there continues to be no potential for
abuse.
B. Past Grants of Authorization for
Interlocks That No Longer Require
Commission Authorization
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
1. Final Rule
7. In Order No. 856, the Commission
explained that § 45.2 of the
Commission’s regulations describes the
types of interlocking positions that
require Commission authorization,
including those between a public utility
and entities authorized by law to
underwrite or participate in the
marketing of public utility securities.9
However, in 1999, Congress amended
FPA section 305(b)(2) to provide that an
applicant for certain interlocking
positions is no longer required to obtain
Commission authorization to hold such
positions.10 In Order No. 856, consistent
with the revision of the underlying
statute, the Commission revised § 45.2
of its regulations to add that an
applicant for an interlocking position
between a public utility and a ‘‘bank,
trust company, banking association, or
firm that is authorized by law to
underwrite or participate in the
marketing of public utility securities’’ 11
does not need Commission
authorization when certain
circumstances are present; that is, when:
• The person does not participate in
any deliberations or decisions of the
public utility regarding the selection of
the bank, trust company, banking
association, or firm to underwrite or
participate in the marketing of securities
of the public utility, if the person serves
as an officer or director of a bank, trust
company, banking association, or firm
8 See Automatic Authorization for Holding
Certain Positions that Require Commission
Approval Under Section 305(b) of the Federal
Power Act, Order No. 446, 34 FERC 61,168 at
30,129–30,131 (1986).
9 18 CFR 45.2(b)(2).
10 See Public Law 106–102, sec. 737, 113 Stat.
1338, 1479 (1999) (known as the Gramm-LeachBliley Act).
11 18 CFR 45.2(b)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jul 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
that is under consideration in the
deliberation process;
• the bank, trust company, banking
association, or firm of which the person
is an officer or director does not engage
in the underwriting of, or participate in
the marketing of, securities of the public
utility of which the person holds the
position of officer or director;
• the public utility for which he/she
serves or proposes to serve as an officer
or director selects underwriters by
competitive procedures; or
• the issuance of securities of the
public utility for which the person
serves or proposes to serve as an officer
or director has been approved by all
Federal and State regulatory agencies
having jurisdiction over the issuance.12
2. Request for Rehearing
8. El Paso states that a member of its
board of directors sought and received
Commission approval for an interlock
that was subsequently removed from the
Commission’s FPA jurisdiction as a
result of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. El
Paso states that ‘‘[t]he presence of this,
and other, past grants of case-specific
authorizations for interlocks no longer
within the Commission’s Federal Power
Act jurisdiction creates the potential for
confusion and uncertainty regarding
whether those past applicants are
expected to adhere to the requirements
of [p]art 45 of the Commission’s
regulations governing Commissionapproved interlocks.’’ El Paso therefore
seeks the Commission’s grant of
clarification in this regard, or, in the
alternative, rehearing of Order No.
856.13
3. Commission Determination
9. We grant El Paso’s request for
clarification and clarify that if, as a
result of the change in FPA section
305(b)(2) in 1999 and the corresponding
changes to § 45.2 of the Commission’s
regulations made by Order No. 856, an
individual no longer holds an interlock
that requires Commission authorization,
that individual no longer needs to
adhere to the requirements of parts 45
and 46 of the Commission’s regulations
governing Commission approval of such
interlocks. We direct those individuals
holding interlocking positions that no
longer require Commission
authorization to make a notice of change
filing under § 45.5 of the Commission’s
regulations, within 45 days of the
effective date of this order, informing
the Commission that they no longer
hold such interlocks.
12 Order No. 856, 166 FERC ¶ 61,119 at P 6; see
also 16 U.S.C. 825d(b)(2).
13 El Paso Request for Rehearing at 4–5.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35825
III. Document Availability
10. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the internet through the
Commission’s Home Page (https://
www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s
Public Reference Room during normal
business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
11. From the Commission’s Home
Page on the internet, this information is
available on eLibrary. The full text of
this document is available on eLibrary
in PDF and Microsoft Word format for
viewing, printing, and/or downloading.
To access this document in eLibrary,
type the docket number excluding the
last three digits of this document in the
docket number field.
12. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the Commission’s website
during normal business hours from
FERC Online Support at (202) 502–6652
(toll free at 1–866–208–3676) or email at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the
Public Reference Room at (202) 502–
8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email the
Public Reference Room at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
Issued: July 18, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–15715 Filed 7–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0624]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac Swim
Event, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters of the Straits of
Mackinac within 250-yards of the
Mackinac Bridge. The safety zone is
needed to protect 400 swimmers
participating in a swim across the
Mackinac Straits from risks associated
with the boating public. Entry of vessels
or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35824-35825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15715]
[[Page 35824]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
18 CFR Parts 45 and 46
[Docket No. RM18-15-001; Order No. 856-A]
Interlocking Officers and Directors; Requirements for Applicants
and Holders
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Order on rehearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this order on rehearing, the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission grants in part and denies in part rehearing and
clarification regarding certain revisions to its regulations related to
interlocking officers and directors.
DATES: This order on rehearing will become effective September 23,
2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lindsay Orphanides (Technical Information), Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8372, [email protected]
Mary Ellen Stefanou (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, (202) 502-8989, [email protected]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
1. On February 21, 2019, the Commission issued Order No. 856.\1\
Order No. 856 revised parts 45 and 46 of the Commission's regulations
related to interlocking officers and directors to clarify and update
the requirements for both applicants and holders. In particular, Order
No. 856: (1) Updated the Commission's regulations to reflect statutory
changes to the circumstances in which an applicant who would otherwise
require Commission authorization to hold an interlocking position need
not do so; (2) revised the Commission's regulations and clarified the
Commission's position on late-filed applications and informational
reports; (3) revised the Commission's regulations and clarified that an
interlock holder is not required to file a notice of change when merely
changing positions within a holding company; (4) revised the
Commission's regulations and stated that applicants do not need to list
in their applications public utilities that do not have officers or
directors; (5) revised the Commission's regulations with regard to
public utilities owned by a natural person; (6) created an exemption
from the filing requirements for interlocking positions of 90 days or
less; and (7) removed Sec. 46.2(b) of the Commission's regulations,
which contained definitions and phrases now rendered obsolete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Interlocking Officers and Directors; Requirements for
Applicants and Holders, Order No. 856, 84 FR 7274 (March 4, 2019),
166 FERC ] 61,119 (2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. On March 25, 2019, El Paso Electric Company (El Paso) filed a
request for rehearing of Order No. 856, seeking clarification or
rehearing of two revisions made by the final rule. We address these
issues below.
II. Discussion
A. Sufficiency of Form No. 561 for Reporting Changes in Position
1. Final Rule
3. In Order No. 856, the Commission amended Sec. Sec. 45.4 and
45.5 of the Commission's regulations to state that supplemental
applications and notices of change need not be filed in the case of a
person already authorized to hold interlocks identified in Sec.
45.9(a) who may assume new or different positions that are still among
those identified by Sec. 45.9(a). The Commission stated that such
changes in positions among related public utilities are already
reported in the annual Form No. 561s,\2\ and separate filings under
Sec. 45.4 or Sec. 45.5 are unnecessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 18 CFR 131.31 (Annual Report of Interlocking Positions). The
Form No. 561 is an annual report of information detailing electric
public utility officer and board of director positions that officers
and directors held within and outside their affiliated public
utility at any point during the preceding year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Request for Rehearing
4. El Paso seeks clarification that supplemental applications and
notices of change need not be filed in the case of a person already
authorized to hold interlocks with respect to all interlocks authorized
under part 45 generally, and is not limited solely to interlocks
identified in Sec. 45.9. El Paso states that, when an officer or
director holds a new or different interlocking position within any
interlock authorized under part 45, it is reported in Form No. 561. El
Paso asserts that ``the Commission's rationale for its clarification in
Order No. 856 that Form No. 561 reporting is sufficient, and that
supplemental applications and changes in notice need not be filed if/
when an officer or director assumes a new or different position within
the same interlocking companies, applies equally to any interlock
authorized under [p]art 45, and not merely to an interlock identified
in [Sec. ] 45.9.'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ El Paso Request for Rehearing at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. El Paso states that, in the alternative, it seeks rehearing of
Order No. 856 and requests that the Commission grant equal treatment to
all interlocks authorized under part 45, on the basis that it is
sufficient for changes in position for all authorized interlocks to be
reported annually in Form No. 561, without the need for the filing of a
supplemental application under Sec. 45.4 or a notice of change under
Sec. 45.5.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id. (internal citations omitted).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Commission Determination
6. We deny El Paso's request for clarification or rehearing. The
Commission's rationale for the change adopted in Order No. 856 that
supplemental applications and notices of change need not be filed in
the case of a person already authorized to hold interlocks identified
in Sec. 45.9(a) stated that ``such changes in positions among related
public utilities are already reported in the annual Form No. 561s, and
separate filings under Sec. 45.4 or Sec. 45.5 are unnecessary.'' \5\
However, that rationale does not apply equally to ``any interlock
authorized under [p]art 45.'' \6\ The Commission has recognized a
difference between holding interlocks among two or more commonly-owned
or -controlled public utilities, and holding an interlock between, for
example, a public utility and an electrical equipment supplier.
Interlocks that fall under Sec. 45.2 and are not between two or more
commonly-owned or -controlled public utilities (and therefore are
outside the scope of Sec. 45.9(a)) are reviewed by the Commission so
that the Commission can be sure that the ``evils to be eliminated by
the enactment of section 305(b)'' \7\ are not present. By contrast, for
interlocks that fall under Sec. 45.9(a)'s automatic
[[Page 35825]]
authorization, the Commission has found that the evils to be eliminated
by the enactment of Federal Power Act (FPA) section 305(b) are not
present because the potential for abuse would be unlikely to result
from such interlocks.\8\ Therefore, we will continue to require an
officer or director who seeks a new or different interlocking position,
or leaves a position, with entities covered by Sec. 45.2 and not
subject to the automatic authorization of Sec. 45.9(a) to file
supplemental applications and notices of change so that the Commission
may review the new or different position to ensure that there continues
to be no potential for abuse.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Order No. 856, 166 FERC ] 61,119 at P 12 (emphasis added).
\6\ El Paso Request for Rehearing at 4.
\7\ James S. Pignatelli, 111 FERC ] 61,496, at P 12 (2005)
(quoting John Edward Aldred, 2 FPC 247, 261 (1940)). The ``evils to
be eliminated by the enactment of section 305(b),'' include: ``[. .
.] (3) the lack of arm's-length dealings between public utilities
and organizations furnishing financial services or electrical
equipment; (4) the employment of dummy directors designated solely
for the purpose of executing the order of those in control, and
nominal directors who give little time and attention to the affairs
of the companies; and (5) violations of laws, ethics, and good
business practices by those holding such interlocking positions
whereby such relationship is employed for their own benefit or
profit, or for the benefit or profit of any other person or persons
and to the detriment of the companies, their security holders or the
public interest.'' Id.; accord Hatch v. FERC, 654 F.2d 825, 831-32
(D.C. Cir. 1981).
\8\ See Automatic Authorization for Holding Certain Positions
that Require Commission Approval Under Section 305(b) of the Federal
Power Act, Order No. 446, 34 FERC 61,168 at 30,129-30,131 (1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Past Grants of Authorization for Interlocks That No Longer Require
Commission Authorization
1. Final Rule
7. In Order No. 856, the Commission explained that Sec. 45.2 of
the Commission's regulations describes the types of interlocking
positions that require Commission authorization, including those
between a public utility and entities authorized by law to underwrite
or participate in the marketing of public utility securities.\9\
However, in 1999, Congress amended FPA section 305(b)(2) to provide
that an applicant for certain interlocking positions is no longer
required to obtain Commission authorization to hold such positions.\10\
In Order No. 856, consistent with the revision of the underlying
statute, the Commission revised Sec. 45.2 of its regulations to add
that an applicant for an interlocking position between a public utility
and a ``bank, trust company, banking association, or firm that is
authorized by law to underwrite or participate in the marketing of
public utility securities'' \11\ does not need Commission authorization
when certain circumstances are present; that is, when:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 18 CFR 45.2(b)(2).
\10\ See Public Law 106-102, sec. 737, 113 Stat. 1338, 1479
(1999) (known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act).
\11\ 18 CFR 45.2(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The person does not participate in any deliberations or
decisions of the public utility regarding the selection of the bank,
trust company, banking association, or firm to underwrite or
participate in the marketing of securities of the public utility, if
the person serves as an officer or director of a bank, trust company,
banking association, or firm that is under consideration in the
deliberation process;
the bank, trust company, banking association, or firm of
which the person is an officer or director does not engage in the
underwriting of, or participate in the marketing of, securities of the
public utility of which the person holds the position of officer or
director;
the public utility for which he/she serves or proposes to
serve as an officer or director selects underwriters by competitive
procedures; or
the issuance of securities of the public utility for which
the person serves or proposes to serve as an officer or director has
been approved by all Federal and State regulatory agencies having
jurisdiction over the issuance.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Order No. 856, 166 FERC ] 61,119 at P 6; see also 16 U.S.C.
825d(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Request for Rehearing
8. El Paso states that a member of its board of directors sought
and received Commission approval for an interlock that was subsequently
removed from the Commission's FPA jurisdiction as a result of the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. El Paso states that ``[t]he presence of this,
and other, past grants of case-specific authorizations for interlocks
no longer within the Commission's Federal Power Act jurisdiction
creates the potential for confusion and uncertainty regarding whether
those past applicants are expected to adhere to the requirements of
[p]art 45 of the Commission's regulations governing Commission-approved
interlocks.'' El Paso therefore seeks the Commission's grant of
clarification in this regard, or, in the alternative, rehearing of
Order No. 856.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ El Paso Request for Rehearing at 4-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Commission Determination
9. We grant El Paso's request for clarification and clarify that
if, as a result of the change in FPA section 305(b)(2) in 1999 and the
corresponding changes to Sec. 45.2 of the Commission's regulations
made by Order No. 856, an individual no longer holds an interlock that
requires Commission authorization, that individual no longer needs to
adhere to the requirements of parts 45 and 46 of the Commission's
regulations governing Commission approval of such interlocks. We direct
those individuals holding interlocking positions that no longer require
Commission authorization to make a notice of change filing under Sec.
45.5 of the Commission's regulations, within 45 days of the effective
date of this order, informing the Commission that they no longer hold
such interlocks.
III. Document Availability
10. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov) and
in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426.
11. From the Commission's Home Page on the internet, this
information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is
available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing,
printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type
the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in
the docket number field.
12. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's
website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at (202)
502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at
[email protected], or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at
[email protected].
Issued: July 18, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-15715 Filed 7-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P