List of Courts of Indian Offenses; Future Publication of Updates, 35355-35356 [2019-15549]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2019 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 11
[192A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
RIN 1076–AF46
List of Courts of Indian Offenses;
Future Publication of Updates
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
revise one section of our regulations to
provide that the current list of areas in
Indian Country with Courts of Indian
Offenses (also known as CFR Courts)
will be published and updated in the
Federal Register and on the Bureau of
Indian Affairs (BIA) website. Currently,
that section of the Code of Federal
Regulations, itself, lists the areas in
Indian Country with CFR Courts,
requiring a rulemaking each time a court
is added or deleted. Allowing for
publication in the Federal Register, in
lieu of a rulemaking, will better keep
Tribal members and the public updated
on the current status of the Courts of
Indian Offenses.
DATES: Comments are due by September
23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by RIN number 1076–AF46
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for sending comments.
• Email: consultation@bia.gov.
Include RIN number 1076–AF46 in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail or Hand-Delivery/Courier:
Office of Regulatory Affairs &
Collaborative Action—Indian Affairs
(RACA), U.S. Department of the Interior,
1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop 4660,
Washington, DC 20240.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking (RIN 1076–AF46). All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative
Action, (202) 273–4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Generally,
Courts of Indian Offenses operate in
those areas of Indian country where
Tribes retain jurisdiction over Indians
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
35355
that is exclusive of State jurisdiction,
but where Tribal courts have not been
established to fully exercise that
jurisdiction. The Code of Federal
Regulations, at 25 CFR 11.100, currently
lists each Tribe for which Courts of
Indian Offenses have been established.
On occasion, a Court of Indian
Offenses is established or re-established
or, alternatively, a Court of Indian
Offenses ceases operation because BIA
and a Tribe enter into a contract or
compact for the Tribe to provide judicial
services or the Tribe establishes a court
system that meets regulatory
requirements. Each time one of these
changes occurs, the list of Courts of
Indian Offenses must be updated for
public transparency. Because the list of
Courts of Indian Offenses is directly in
§ 11.100, a rulemaking is required to
change the list. During the time it takes
to conduct a rulemaking, the list in the
Code of Federal Regulations is not
accurate.
To allow for more agile responses to
status changes, this proposed rule
would remove the list of CFR Courts
from the regulations and instead require
the BIA to publish the current list and
any updates to the current list in the
Federal Register and on its website.
This proposed rule would enable BIA to
keep the list of CFR Courts updated and
accurate, improving transparency for
Tribal members and the public who
wish to know what areas in Indian
Country have CFR Courts established.
The proposed rule also revises § 11.104
to clarify that the list would no longer
be published directly in § 11.100, but
rather would be published in
accordance with the directions in
§ 11.100 to publish in the Federal
Register and on the BIA website.
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. The
E.O. directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. E.O. 13771: Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs
This action is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because this rule is not
significant under Executive Order
12866.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). It does not change
current funding requirements and
would not impose any economic effects
on small governmental entities.
D. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Will not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Will not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises
to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
F. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under E.O. 12630. A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
G. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of E.O.
13132, this rule does not have sufficient
E:\FR\FM\23JYP1.SGM
23JYP1
35356
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2019 / Proposed Rules
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement. A federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
H. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the
criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate
errors and ambiguity and be written to
minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that
all regulations be written in clear
language and contain clear legal
standards.
I. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and Tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in E.O. 13175 and
have determined there are no
substantial direct effects on Federally
recognized Indian Tribes that will result
from this rulemaking because BIA
consults on an individual basis with
each Tribe for which there is a change
in the status of their CFR Court.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., prohibits a
Federal agency from conducting or
sponsoring a collection of information
that requires OMB approval, unless
such approval has been obtained and
the collection request displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Nor is any person required to respond
to an information collection request that
has not complied with the PRA. There
is no information collection requiring
OMB approval associated with this
proposed rule. A Federal agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and you are not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless the form or
regulation requesting the information
displays a currently valid OMB Control
Number.
K. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because this is
an administrative and procedural
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
regulation. (For further information see
43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also
determined that the rule does not
involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA.
L. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in E.O.
13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is
not required.
M. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
a. Be logically organized;
b. Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
c. Use clear language rather than
jargon;
d. Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
e. Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that are unclearly
written, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you believe
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
PART 11—COURTS OF INDIAN
OFFENSES AND LAW AND ORDER
CODE
1. The authority for part 11 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; R.S. 463, 25 U.S.C.
2; R.S. 465, 25 U.S.C. 9; 42 Stat. 208, 25
U.S.C. 13; 38 Stat. 586, 25 U.S.C. 200.
Subpart A—Application; Jurisdiction
■
2. Revise § 11.100 to read as follows:
§ 11.100 Where are Courts of Indian
Offenses established?
(a) A list of the areas in Indian
Country where Courts of Indian
Offenses are established is available on
the Bureau of Indian Affairs website
(www.bia.gov) and is published
periodically in the Federal Register.
(b) The Director, Bureau of Indian
Affairs, will maintain on the Bureau of
Indian Affairs website (www.bia.gov) an
updated list of the areas in Indian
Country where Courts of Indian
Offenses are established and, upon any
change to the list, will publish notice of
the change in the Federal Register with
an updated complete list.
■ 3. Revise § 11.104(a) introductory text
to read as follows:
§ 11.104
When does this part apply?
(a) The regulations in this part
continue to apply to each area in Indian
Country listed in accordance with
§ 11.100 until either:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 25, 2019.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019–15549 Filed 7–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
N. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 11
Courts, Indians-law.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
proposes to amend 25 CFR part 11 as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2000–0007; FRL–9997–
04–Region 8]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion
of the Intermountain Waste Oil
Refinery Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 8 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete Intermountain
Waste Oil Refinery Superfund Site (Site)
located in Bountiful City, Davis County,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JYP1.SGM
23JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 23, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35355-35356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15549]
[[Page 35355]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 11
[192A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]
RIN 1076-AF46
List of Courts of Indian Offenses; Future Publication of Updates
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would revise one section of our regulations
to provide that the current list of areas in Indian Country with Courts
of Indian Offenses (also known as CFR Courts) will be published and
updated in the Federal Register and on the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) website. Currently, that section of the Code of Federal
Regulations, itself, lists the areas in Indian Country with CFR Courts,
requiring a rulemaking each time a court is added or deleted. Allowing
for publication in the Federal Register, in lieu of a rulemaking, will
better keep Tribal members and the public updated on the current status
of the Courts of Indian Offenses.
DATES: Comments are due by September 23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by RIN number 1076-AF46 by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for sending comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include RIN number 1076-AF46
in the subject line of the message.
Mail or Hand-Delivery/Courier: Office of Regulatory
Affairs & Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs (RACA), U.S. Department
of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop 4660, Washington, DC
20240.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this rulemaking (RIN 1076-AF46). All
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action, (202) 273-4680;
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Generally, Courts of Indian Offenses operate
in those areas of Indian country where Tribes retain jurisdiction over
Indians that is exclusive of State jurisdiction, but where Tribal
courts have not been established to fully exercise that jurisdiction.
The Code of Federal Regulations, at 25 CFR 11.100, currently lists each
Tribe for which Courts of Indian Offenses have been established.
On occasion, a Court of Indian Offenses is established or re-
established or, alternatively, a Court of Indian Offenses ceases
operation because BIA and a Tribe enter into a contract or compact for
the Tribe to provide judicial services or the Tribe establishes a court
system that meets regulatory requirements. Each time one of these
changes occurs, the list of Courts of Indian Offenses must be updated
for public transparency. Because the list of Courts of Indian Offenses
is directly in Sec. 11.100, a rulemaking is required to change the
list. During the time it takes to conduct a rulemaking, the list in the
Code of Federal Regulations is not accurate.
To allow for more agile responses to status changes, this proposed
rule would remove the list of CFR Courts from the regulations and
instead require the BIA to publish the current list and any updates to
the current list in the Federal Register and on its website. This
proposed rule would enable BIA to keep the list of CFR Courts updated
and accurate, improving transparency for Tribal members and the public
who wish to know what areas in Indian Country have CFR Courts
established. The proposed rule also revises Sec. 11.104 to clarify
that the list would no longer be published directly in Sec. 11.100,
but rather would be published in accordance with the directions in
Sec. 11.100 to publish in the Federal Register and on the BIA website.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The E.O. directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of
ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these
requirements.
B. E.O. 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
This action is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this
rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
It does not change current funding requirements and would not impose
any economic effects on small governmental entities.
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Will not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of the
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
F. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under E.O. 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
G. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of E.O. 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient
[[Page 35356]]
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. A federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
H. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
I. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in E.O. 13175 and have determined there are no substantial direct
effects on Federally recognized Indian Tribes that will result from
this rulemaking because BIA consults on an individual basis with each
Tribe for which there is a change in the status of their CFR Court.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
prohibits a Federal agency from conducting or sponsoring a collection
of information that requires OMB approval, unless such approval has
been obtained and the collection request displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Nor is any person required to respond to an information
collection request that has not complied with the PRA. There is no
information collection requiring OMB approval associated with this
proposed rule. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the form
or regulation requesting the information displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number.
K. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because this is an administrative and procedural regulation.
(For further information see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also determined
that the rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances
listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.
L. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in E.O. 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
M. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
a. Be logically organized;
b. Use the active voice to address readers directly;
c. Use clear language rather than jargon;
d. Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
e. Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences
are too long, the sections where you believe lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
N. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 11
Courts, Indians-law.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, proposes to amend 25 CFR part 11 as
follows:
PART 11--COURTS OF INDIAN OFFENSES AND LAW AND ORDER CODE
0
1. The authority for part 11 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; R.S. 463, 25 U.S.C. 2; R.S. 465, 25
U.S.C. 9; 42 Stat. 208, 25 U.S.C. 13; 38 Stat. 586, 25 U.S.C. 200.
Subpart A--Application; Jurisdiction
0
2. Revise Sec. 11.100 to read as follows:
Sec. 11.100 Where are Courts of Indian Offenses established?
(a) A list of the areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian
Offenses are established is available on the Bureau of Indian Affairs
website (www.bia.gov) and is published periodically in the Federal
Register.
(b) The Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, will maintain on the
Bureau of Indian Affairs website (www.bia.gov) an updated list of the
areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian Offenses are established
and, upon any change to the list, will publish notice of the change in
the Federal Register with an updated complete list.
0
3. Revise Sec. 11.104(a) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 11.104 When does this part apply?
(a) The regulations in this part continue to apply to each area in
Indian Country listed in accordance with Sec. 11.100 until either:
* * * * *
Dated: June 25, 2019.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2019-15549 Filed 7-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P