Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance: Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities, 34396-34398 [2019-15283]
Download as PDF
34396
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2019 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,600
Comments: The Department
specifically requests comments on (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Authority: Sec. 413. [8 U.S.C. 1523]
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–15274 Filed 7–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–45–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0976]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Guidance:
Emergency Use Authorization of
Medical Products and Related
Authorities
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by August 19,
2019.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202–
395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0595. Also
include the FDA docket number found
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Jul 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amber Sanford, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three
White Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, 301–796–8867 PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Guidance: Emergency Use
Authorization of Medical Products and
Related Authorities
OMB Control Number 0910–0595—
Extension
The guidance describes the Agency’s
policies applicable to the authorization
of the emergency use of certain medical
products under sections 564, 564A, and
564B of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360bbb–3, 360bbb–3a, and 360bbb–3b),
as amended or added by the Project
BioShield Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–
276), the Pandemic and All-Hazards
Preparedness Reauthorization Act of
2013 (Pub. L. 113–5), 21st Century
Cures Act (Pub. L. 114–255), and Public
Law 115–92 (2017). The FD&C Act
permits the FDA Commissioner (the
Commissioner) to authorize the use of
unapproved medical products or
unapproved uses of approved medical
products during an emergency declared
under section 564 of the FD&C Act. The
data to support issuance of an
emergency use authorization (EUA)
must demonstrate that, based on the
totality of the scientific evidence
available to the Commissioner,
including data from adequate and wellcontrolled clinical trials (if available), it
is reasonable to believe that the product
may be effective in diagnosing, treating,
or preventing a serious or lifethreatening disease or condition (21
U.S.C. 360bbb–3(c)). Although the exact
type and amount of data needed to
support an EUA may vary depending on
the nature of the declared emergency
and the nature of the candidate product,
FDA recommends that a request for
consideration for an EUA include
scientific evidence evaluating the
product’s safety and effectiveness,
including the adverse event profile for
diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of
the serious or life-threatening disease or
condition, as well as data and other
information on safety, effectiveness,
risks and benefits, and (to the extent
available) alternatives.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Under section 564 of the FD&C Act,
the Commissioner may establish
conditions on the authorization. Section
564(e) requires the Commissioner (to the
extent practicable given the
circumstances of the emergency) to
establish certain conditions on an
authorization that the Commissioner
finds necessary or appropriate to protect
the public health and permits the
Commissioner to establish other
conditions that he or she finds
necessary or appropriate to protect the
public health. Conditions authorized by
section 564(e) of the FD&C Act include,
for example: Requirements for
information dissemination to healthcare
providers or authorized dispensers and
product recipients; adverse event
monitoring and reporting; data
collection and analysis; recordkeeping
and records access; restrictions on
product advertising, distribution, and
administration; and limitations on good
manufacturing practices requirements.
Some conditions, the statute specifies,
are mandatory to the extent practicable
for authorizations of unapproved
products and discretionary for
authorizations of unapproved uses of
approved products. Moreover, some
conditions may apply to manufacturers
of an EUA product, while other
conditions may apply to any person
who carries out any activity for which
the authorization is issued. Section 564
of the FD&C Act also gives the
Commissioner authority to establish
other conditions on an authorization
that he or she finds to be necessary or
appropriate to protect the public health.
Additionally, sections 564A and 564B
established streamlined mechanisms to
facilitate preparedness and response
activities involving certain FDAapproved products without requiring
FDA to issue an EUA, including
expiration date extension authority.
For purposes of estimating the annual
burden of reporting (table 1), FDA has
established four categories of
respondents: (1) Those who file a
request for FDA to issue an EUA or a
substantive amendment to an EUA that
has previously been issued, assuming
that a requisite declaration under
section 564 of the FD&C Act has been
made and criteria for issuance have
been met; (2) those who submit a
request for FDA to review information/
data (i.e., a pre-EUA package) for a
candidate EUA product or a substantive
amendment to an existing pre-EUA
package for preparedness purposes; (3)
manufacturers who carry out an activity
related to an unapproved EUA product
(e.g., administering product,
disseminating information) who must
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
34397
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2019 / Notices
report to FDA regarding such activity;
and (4) public health authorities (e.g.,
State, local) who carry out an activity
(e.g., administering product,
disseminating information) related to an
unapproved EUA product who must
report to FDA regarding such activity or
who submit to FDA an expiration date
extension request for an approved
product.
In some cases, manufacturers directly
submit EUA requests. Often a Federal
Government entity (e.g., Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention,
Department of Defense) requests that
FDA issue an EUA and submits preEUA packages for FDA to review. In
many of these cases, manufacturer
respondents inform these requests and
submissions, which are the activities
that form the basis of the estimated
reporting burdens. However, in some
cases the Federal Government is the sole
respondent; manufacturers do not
inform these requests or submissions.
FDA estimates minimal burden when
the Federal Government performs the
relevant activities. In addition to
variability based on whether there is an
active manufacturer respondent, other
factors also inject significant variability
in estimates for annual reporting
burdens. A second factor is the type of
product. For example, FDA estimates
greater burden for novel therapeutics
than for certain unapproved uses of
approved products. A third significant
factor that injects variability is the type
of submission. For example, FDA
estimates greater burden for ‘‘original’’
EUA and pre-EUA submissions than for
amendments to them, and FDA
estimates minimal burden to issue an
EUA when there is a previously
reviewed pre-EUA package or
investigational application. For
purposes of estimating the reporting
burden, FDA has calculated the
anticipated burden on manufacturers
based on the anticipated types of
responses (i.e., estimated manufacturer
input), types of product, and types of
submission that comprise the described
reporting activities.
For purposes of estimating the annual
burden of recordkeeping, FDA has also
calculated the anticipated burden on
manufacturers and public health
officials associated with administration
of unapproved products authorized for
emergency use, recognizing that the
Federal Government will perform much
of the recordkeeping related to
administration of such products (table
2). FDA is not calculating any
recordkeeping burden for public health
authorities who may need to submit
expiration date extension requests, as
these entities already maintain records
for the products that they stockpile,
which would include records of any
expiration date request or extension.
The guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information.
These collections are subject to review
by the OMB under the PRA. These
collections have been approved as
follows: Adverse experience reporting
for biological products is approved
under OMB control number 0910–0308;
adverse drug experience reporting is
approved under OMB control number
0910–0230; adverse device experience
reporting is approved under OMB
control number 0910–0471;
investigational new drug (IND)
application regulations are approved
under OMB control number 0910–0014
and investigational device exemption
(IDE) reporting is approved under OMB
control number 0910–0078; current
good manufacturing practices for
finished pharmaceuticals are approved
under OMB control number 0910–0139,
and for devices under OMB control
number 0910–0073; applications for
marketing a new drug are approved
under OMB control number 0910–0001,
and for biological products under OMB
control number 0910–0338. Any
additional burden imposed by this
proposed collection would be minimal.
In the Federal Register of April 4,
2019 (84 FR 13299), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. Although one comment
was received, it was not responsive to
the four collection of information topics
solicited.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Requests to Issue an EUA or a Substantive Amendment
to an Existing EUA ...........................................................
FDA Review of a Pre-EUA Package or an Amendment
Thereto .............................................................................
Manufacturers of an Unapproved EUA Product ..................
Public Health Authorities; Unapproved EUA Product ..........
Public Health Authorities; Request for Expiration Date Extension ..............................................................................
Total ..............................................................................
1 There
No. of
responses per
respondent
No. of
respondents
Type of respondent
Average
burden
per response
(hours)
Total annual
responses
Total hours
12
2.39
29
45
1,305
32
12
30
1.79
5.8
3
57
70
90
34
2
2
1,938
140
180
1
1
1
2
2
........................
........................
........................
........................
3,565
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
No. of
recordkeepers
Type of respondent
No. of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
Manufacturers of an Unapproved EUA Product ..................
Public Health Authorities; Unapproved EUA Product ..........
12
30
2
3
24
90
25
3
600
270
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
870
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Jul 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
34398
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2019 / Notices
Since the last OMB approval, our
estimated annual reporting burden for
the information collection reflects an
increase due to an increase in the
number of submissions we have
received.
Dated: July 11, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–15283 Filed 7–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2018–N–4428]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Medicated Feed
Mill License Application
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by August 19,
2019.
SUMMARY:
To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202–
395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0337. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug
Administration, Three White Flint
North, 10A–12M, 11601 Landsdown St.,
North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301–796–
3794, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
ADDRESSES:
Medicated Feed Mill License
Application—21 CFR Part 515
OMB Control Number 0910–0337—
Extension
Feed manufacturers that seek to
manufacture feed using Category II,
Type A medicated articles or
manufacture certain liquid and freechoice feed, using Category I, Type A
medicated articles that must follow
proprietary formulas or specifications
are required to obtain a facility license
under section 512 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 360b). Our regulations in part
515 (21 CFR part 515) establish the
procedures associated with applying for
a facility license. We require that a
manufacturer seeking a facility license
submit a completed medicated feed mill
license application using Form FDA
3448 (§ 515.10(b) (21 CFR 515.10(b))).
We use the information submitted to
establish that the applicant has made
the certifications required by section
512 of the FD&C Act, to register the mill,
and to schedule a pre-approval
inspection.
We require the submission of a
supplemental medicated feed mill
license application for a change in
facility ownership or a change in facility
address (§ 515.11(b) (21 CFR 515.11(b))).
If a licensed facility is no longer
manufacturing medicated animal feed
under § 515.23 (21 CFR 515.23), a
manufacturer may request voluntary
revocation of a medicated feed mill
license. An applicant also has the right
to file a request for hearing under
§ 515.30(c) (21 CFR 515.30(c)) to give
reasons why a medicated feed mill
license should not be refused or
revoked.
In the Federal Register of December
26, 2018 (83 FR 66280), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Medicated Feed Mill License Application using
Form FDA 3448 (515.10(b)).
Supplemental Feed Mill License Application
using Form FDA 3448 (515.11(b)).
Voluntary Revocation of Medicated Feed Mill License (515.23).
Filing a Request for a Hearing on Medicated
Feed Mill License (515.30(c)).
Total .............................................................
1 There
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section and activity
Average
burden per
response
Total annual
responses
Total hours
14
1
14
0.25 (15 minutes) ...........
4
54
1
54
0.25 (15 minutes) ...........
14
29
1
29
0.25 (15 minutes) ...........
7
1
1
1
4 .....................................
4
........................
........................
........................
........................................
29
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
21 CFR section and activity
Maintenance of Records for Approved Labeling
for Each ‘‘Type B’’ and ‘‘Type C’’ Feed
(510.305).
1 There
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
837
1
Total annual
records
837
Average burden
per recordkeeping
0.03 (2 minutes) .............
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Jul 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Total hours
25
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 138 (Thursday, July 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34396-34398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15283]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0976]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance: Emergency
Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by August
19, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax: 202-395-7285, or emailed to [email protected]. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0595.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Sanford, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-8867
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Guidance: Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related
Authorities
OMB Control Number 0910-0595--Extension
The guidance describes the Agency's policies applicable to the
authorization of the emergency use of certain medical products under
sections 564, 564A, and 564B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3, 360bbb-3a, and 360bbb-3b), as
amended or added by the Project BioShield Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-
276), the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of
2013 (Pub. L. 113-5), 21st Century Cures Act (Pub. L. 114-255), and
Public Law 115-92 (2017). The FD&C Act permits the FDA Commissioner
(the Commissioner) to authorize the use of unapproved medical products
or unapproved uses of approved medical products during an emergency
declared under section 564 of the FD&C Act. The data to support
issuance of an emergency use authorization (EUA) must demonstrate that,
based on the totality of the scientific evidence available to the
Commissioner, including data from adequate and well-controlled clinical
trials (if available), it is reasonable to believe that the product may
be effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing a serious or life-
threatening disease or condition (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(c)). Although the
exact type and amount of data needed to support an EUA may vary
depending on the nature of the declared emergency and the nature of the
candidate product, FDA recommends that a request for consideration for
an EUA include scientific evidence evaluating the product's safety and
effectiveness, including the adverse event profile for diagnosis,
treatment, or prevention of the serious or life-threatening disease or
condition, as well as data and other information on safety,
effectiveness, risks and benefits, and (to the extent available)
alternatives.
Under section 564 of the FD&C Act, the Commissioner may establish
conditions on the authorization. Section 564(e) requires the
Commissioner (to the extent practicable given the circumstances of the
emergency) to establish certain conditions on an authorization that the
Commissioner finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public
health and permits the Commissioner to establish other conditions that
he or she finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public health.
Conditions authorized by section 564(e) of the FD&C Act include, for
example: Requirements for information dissemination to healthcare
providers or authorized dispensers and product recipients; adverse
event monitoring and reporting; data collection and analysis;
recordkeeping and records access; restrictions on product advertising,
distribution, and administration; and limitations on good manufacturing
practices requirements. Some conditions, the statute specifies, are
mandatory to the extent practicable for authorizations of unapproved
products and discretionary for authorizations of unapproved uses of
approved products. Moreover, some conditions may apply to manufacturers
of an EUA product, while other conditions may apply to any person who
carries out any activity for which the authorization is issued. Section
564 of the FD&C Act also gives the Commissioner authority to establish
other conditions on an authorization that he or she finds to be
necessary or appropriate to protect the public health. Additionally,
sections 564A and 564B established streamlined mechanisms to facilitate
preparedness and response activities involving certain FDA-approved
products without requiring FDA to issue an EUA, including expiration
date extension authority.
For purposes of estimating the annual burden of reporting (table
1), FDA has established four categories of respondents: (1) Those who
file a request for FDA to issue an EUA or a substantive amendment to an
EUA that has previously been issued, assuming that a requisite
declaration under section 564 of the FD&C Act has been made and
criteria for issuance have been met; (2) those who submit a request for
FDA to review information/data (i.e., a pre-EUA package) for a
candidate EUA product or a substantive amendment to an existing pre-EUA
package for preparedness purposes; (3) manufacturers who carry out an
activity related to an unapproved EUA product (e.g., administering
product, disseminating information) who must
[[Page 34397]]
report to FDA regarding such activity; and (4) public health
authorities (e.g., State, local) who carry out an activity (e.g.,
administering product, disseminating information) related to an
unapproved EUA product who must report to FDA regarding such activity
or who submit to FDA an expiration date extension request for an
approved product.
In some cases, manufacturers directly submit EUA requests. Often a
Federal Government entity (e.g., Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Department of Defense) requests that FDA issue an EUA and
submits pre-EUA packages for FDA to review. In many of these cases,
manufacturer respondents inform these requests and submissions, which
are the activities that form the basis of the estimated reporting
burdens. However, in some cases the Federal Government is the sole
respondent; manufacturers do not inform these requests or submissions.
FDA estimates minimal burden when the Federal Government performs the
relevant activities. In addition to variability based on whether there
is an active manufacturer respondent, other factors also inject
significant variability in estimates for annual reporting burdens. A
second factor is the type of product. For example, FDA estimates
greater burden for novel therapeutics than for certain unapproved uses
of approved products. A third significant factor that injects
variability is the type of submission. For example, FDA estimates
greater burden for ``original'' EUA and pre-EUA submissions than for
amendments to them, and FDA estimates minimal burden to issue an EUA
when there is a previously reviewed pre-EUA package or investigational
application. For purposes of estimating the reporting burden, FDA has
calculated the anticipated burden on manufacturers based on the
anticipated types of responses (i.e., estimated manufacturer input),
types of product, and types of submission that comprise the described
reporting activities.
For purposes of estimating the annual burden of recordkeeping, FDA
has also calculated the anticipated burden on manufacturers and public
health officials associated with administration of unapproved products
authorized for emergency use, recognizing that the Federal Government
will perform much of the recordkeeping related to administration of
such products (table 2). FDA is not calculating any recordkeeping
burden for public health authorities who may need to submit expiration
date extension requests, as these entities already maintain records for
the products that they stockpile, which would include records of any
expiration date request or extension.
The guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information. These collections are subject to review by the OMB under
the PRA. These collections have been approved as follows: Adverse
experience reporting for biological products is approved under OMB
control number 0910-0308; adverse drug experience reporting is approved
under OMB control number 0910-0230; adverse device experience reporting
is approved under OMB control number 0910-0471; investigational new
drug (IND) application regulations are approved under OMB control
number 0910-0014 and investigational device exemption (IDE) reporting
is approved under OMB control number 0910-0078; current good
manufacturing practices for finished pharmaceuticals are approved under
OMB control number 0910-0139, and for devices under OMB control number
0910-0073; applications for marketing a new drug are approved under OMB
control number 0910-0001, and for biological products under OMB control
number 0910-0338. Any additional burden imposed by this proposed
collection would be minimal.
In the Federal Register of April 4, 2019 (84 FR 13299), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. Although one comment was received, it was
not responsive to the four collection of information topics solicited.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Average burden
Type of respondent No. of responses per Total annual per response Total hours
respondents respondent responses (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requests to Issue an EUA or a 12 2.39 29 45 1,305
Substantive Amendment to an
Existing EUA...................
FDA Review of a Pre-EUA Package 32 1.79 57 34 1,938
or an Amendment Thereto........
Manufacturers of an Unapproved 12 5.8 70 2 140
EUA Product....................
Public Health Authorities; 30 3 90 2 180
Unapproved EUA Product.........
Public Health Authorities; 1 1 1 2 2
Request for Expiration Date
Extension......................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 3,565
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of records Average burden
Type of respondent No. of per Total annual per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers of an Unapproved 12 2 24 25 600
EUA Product....................
Public Health Authorities; 30 3 90 3 270
Unapproved EUA Product.........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 870
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
[[Page 34398]]
Since the last OMB approval, our estimated annual reporting burden
for the information collection reflects an increase due to an increase
in the number of submissions we have received.
Dated: July 11, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-15283 Filed 7-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P