Exelon Generation Company LLC; Clinton Power Station Unit 1, 34410-34412 [2019-15271]
Download as PDF
34410
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2019 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. 50–461; NRC–2019–0107]
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of July, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joel S. Wiebe,
Senior Project Manager, Licensing Projects
Branch III, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
the exemption is attached.
Exelon Generation Company LLC;
Clinton Power Station Unit 1
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a November 8,
2018, request from Exelon Generation
Company, LLC (Exelon) to allow Exelon
to submit a sufficient license renewal
application for Clinton Power Station,
Unit 1, at least 3 years prior to the
expiration of the existing license and
still receive timely renewal protection.
DATES: The exemption was issued on
July 11, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2019–0107 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and search
for Docket ID NRC–2019–0107. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is
available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this
document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
S. Wiebe, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–6606, email:
Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov.
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
The text of
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Jul 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
ATTACHMENT—Exemption
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Docket No. 50–461
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1
Exemption
I. Background
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
(Exelon, the licensee), holds Facility
Operating License No. NPF–62, which
authorizes operation of the Clinton
Power Station, Unit 1 (CPS), a boilingwater reactor facility, located in Dewitt
County, Illinois. The license, among
other things, subjects the facility to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect. The current operating license for
CPS expires on April 17, 2027.
By letter dated November 8, 2018
(Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML18312A139), Exelon
requested an exemption to allow Exelon
to submit a license renewal application
for CPS at least 3 years prior to the
expiration of the existing license and, if
found to be sufficient by the NRC, still
receive timely renewal protection under
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section
2.109(b). 10 CFR 2.109(b) provides
timely renewal protection to licensees
that submit sufficient license renewal
applications at least 5 years before the
expiration of the existing license. In its
application, Exelon informed the NRC
that the economic viability of continued
operation of CPS beyond the current
expiration date of its NRC license is
uncertain. According to Exelon, due to
continuing and significant changes in
the economic and legislative
environments that materially affect
continued CPS operation, Exelon will
not be in a position to make a
reasonable and sound business decision
5 years prior to the expiration of the
CPS license as to whether to pursue
license renewal. Exelon contends that
allowing it to make that decision at a
later date, when the economic viability
of extended CPS operation can be more
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
readily assessed, will result in more
efficient use of both Exelon and NRC
financial and other resources.
II. Request/Action
10 CFR 54.17(a) requires that an
application for a renewed license be in
accordance with Subpart A of 10 CFR,
Part 2, which includes 10 CFR 2.109(b).
In turn, 10 CFR 2.109(b) states, ‘‘If the
licensee of a nuclear power plant
licensed under 10 CFR 50.21(b) or 50.22
files a sufficient application for renewal
of either an operating license or a
combined license at least 5 years before
the expiration of the existing license,
the existing license will not be deemed
to have expired until the application has
been finally determined.’’ In its letter
dated November 8, 2018, Exelon
requested an exemption from 10 CFR
54.17(a) to allow Exelon to submit its
license renewal application for CPS at
least 3 years prior to the expiration of
the existing license and still receive
timely renewal protection under
2.109(b). 10 CFR 54.15 allows
exemptions from the requirements of
Part 54 in accordance with 10 CFR
50.12.
III. Discussion
Under 10 CFR 54.15, exemptions from
the requirements of Part 54 are governed
by 10 CFR 50.12. Pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the Commission may, upon
application by any interested person or
upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 50 when (1) the exemptions
are authorized by law, will not present
an undue risk to public health or safety,
and are consistent with the common
defense and security; and (2) when
special circumstances are present, as
defined in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2). In its
application, Exelon stated that three
special circumstances apply to its
request: 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii),
‘‘[a]pplication of the regulation in the
particular circumstances would not
serve the underlying purpose of the rule
or is not necessary to achieve the
underlying purpose of the rule;’’ 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(iii), ‘‘[c]ompliance would
result in undue hardship or other costs
that are significantly in excess of those
contemplated when the regulation was
adopted, or that are significantly in
excess of those incurred by others
similarly situated;’’ and 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(vi), other material
circumstances not considered when the
regulation was adopted are present,
such that granting the exemption is in
the public interest.
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2019 / Notices
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow Exelon
to submit a license renewal application
for CPS at least 3 years prior to the
expiration of its existing license and, if
sufficient, still receive timely renewal
protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b). 10
CFR 2.109 implements Section 9(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA), 5 U.S.C. 558(c), which states:
When the licensee has made timely and
sufficient application for a renewal or a new
license in accordance with agency rules, a
license with reference to an activity of a
continuing nature does not expire until the
application has been finally determined by
the agency.
The 5-year time period specified in 10
CFR 2.109 is the result of a discretionary
agency rulemaking and not required by
the APA. As stated above, 10 CFR 54.15
allows the NRC to grant exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR part
54. The NRC has determined that
granting this exemption will not result
in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended, the APA, or the
NRC’s regulations. Therefore, the
exemption is authorized by law.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
B. The Exemption Presents no Undue
Risk to Public Health and Safety
The requested exemption to allow a 3year time period, rather than the 5 years
specified in 10 CFR 2.109(b), for Exelon
to submit a sufficient license renewal
application and receive timely renewal
protection is a scheduling change. The
action does not change the manner in
which the plant operates and maintains
public health and safety because no
additional changes are made as a result
of the action. The NRC expects that a
period of 3 years provides sufficient
time for the NRC to perform a full and
adequate safety and environmental
review, and for the completion of the
hearing process. Pending final action on
the license renewal application, the
NRC will continue to conduct all
regulatory activities associated with
licensing, inspection, and oversight, and
will take whatever action may be
necessary to ensure adequate protection
of the public health and safety. The
existence of this exemption does not
affect NRC’s authority, applicable to all
licenses, to modify, suspend, or revoke
a license for cause, such as a serious
safety concern. Based on the above, the
NRC finds that the action does not cause
undue risk to public health and safety.
C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the
Common Defense and Security
The requested exemption to allow for
a timely renewal protection deadline of
at least 3 years instead of 5 years is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Jul 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
scheduling change. The exemption does
not change any site security matters.
Therefore, the NRC finds that the action
is consistent with the common defense
and security.
D. Special Circumstances
The purpose of 10 CFR 2.109(b), as it
is applied to nuclear power reactors
licensed by the NRC, is to implement
the ‘‘timely renewal’’ provision of
Section 9(b) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 558(c),
which states:
When the licensee has made timely and
sufficient application for a renewal or a new
license in accordance with agency rules, a
license with reference to an activity of a
continuing nature does not expire until the
application has been finally determined by
the agency.
The underlying purpose of this
‘‘timely renewal’’ provision in the APA
is to protect a licensee who is engaged
in an ongoing licensed activity and who
has complied with agency rules in
applying for a renewed or new license
from facing license expiration as the
result of delays in the administrative
process.
On December 13, 1991, the NRC
published the final license renewal rule,
10 CFR, Part 54, with associated
changes to 10 CFR, Parts 2, 50, and 140,
in the Federal Register (56 FR 64943).
The statement of considerations (SOC)
discussed the basis for establishing the
latest date for filing license renewal
applications and the timely renewal
doctrine (56 FR 64962). The SOC stated
that:
Because the review of a renewal
application will involve a review of many
complex technical issues, the NRC estimates
that the technical review would take
approximately 2 years. Any necessary
hearing could likely add an additional year
or more. Therefore, in the proposed rule, the
Commission modified § 2.109 to require that
nuclear power plant operating license
renewal applications be submitted at least 3
years prior to their expiration in order to take
advantage of the timely renewal doctrine.
No specific comment was received
concerning the proposal to add a 3-year
provision for the timely renewal provision
for license renewal. The current regulations
require licensees to submit decommissioning
plans and related financial assurance
information on or about 5 years prior to the
expiration of their operating licenses. The
Commission has concluded that, for
consistency, the deadline for submittal of a
license renewal application should be 5 years
prior to the expiration of the current
operating license. The timely renewal
provisions of § 2.109 now reflect the decision
that a 5-year time limit is more appropriate.
Thus, the NRC originally estimated
that 3 years was needed to review a
renewal application and complete any
hearing that might be held on the
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34411
application. The NRC changed its
original estimate from 3 years to 5 years
to have consistent deadlines for when
licensees must submit their
decommissioning plans and when they
must submit their license renewal
application to receive timely renewal
protection. The NRC’s current schedule
for review of license renewal
applications is to complete its review
and make a decision on issuing the
renewed license within 22 months of
receipt without a hearing. If a hearing is
held, the NRC’s model schedule
anticipates completion of the NRC’s
review, the hearing process, and
issuance of a decision on issuing the
license within 30 months of receipt.
However, it is recognized that the
estimate of 30 months for completion of
a contested hearing is subject to
variation in any given proceeding. A
period of 3 years (36 months),
nevertheless, is expected to provide
sufficient time for performance of a full
and adequate safety and environmental
review, and completion of the hearing
process. Meeting this schedule is based
on a complete and sufficient application
being submitted and on the review
being completed in accordance with the
NRC’s established license renewal
review schedule.
Based on the above, the NRC finds
that the special circumstance of 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii) is present in the particular
circumstances of CPS.
It should be noted, among the key
matters central to resolution of issues
associated with renewal of the operating
license and also to the application of the
‘‘timely renewal’’ doctrine is the
submission of a sufficient application.
Completing the license renewal review
process on schedule is, of course,
dependent on licensee cooperation in
meeting established schedules for
submittal of any additional information
required by the NRC, and the resolution
of all issues demonstrating that issuance
of a renewed license is warranted.
E. Environmental Considerations
The NRC’s approval of the exemption
to scheduling requirements belongs to a
category of actions that the NRC, by rule
or regulation, has declared to be a
categorical exclusion, after first finding
that the category of actions does not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. Specifically, the
exemption is categorically excluded
from further analysis under 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25).
Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), the
granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation of
chapter 10 is a categorical exclusion
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
34412
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2019 / Notices
provided that (i) there is no significant
hazards consideration; (ii) there is no
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite; (iii) there is no significant
increase in individual or cumulative
public or occupational radiation
exposure; (iv) there is no significant
construction impact; (v) there is no
significant increase in the potential for
or consequences from radiological
accidents; and (vi) the requirements
from which an exemption is sought
involve certain categories of
requirements, including scheduling
requirements.
The Director, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, has determined that
the granting of the exemption request
involves no significant hazards
consideration because allowing the
submittal of the license renewal
application at least 3 years before the
expiration of the existing license while
maintaining the protection of the timely
renewal provision in 10 CFR 2.109(b)
does not (1) involve a significant
increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of
a new or different kind of accident from
any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. The exemption
constitutes a change to the schedule by
which Exelon must submit its license
renewal application and still receive
timely renewal protection and,
therefore, is unrelated to any
operational restriction. Accordingly,
there is no significant change in the
types or significant increase in the
amounts of any effluents that may be
released offsite, and no significant
increase in individual or cumulative
public or occupational radiation
exposure. The exempted regulation is
not associated with construction, so
there is no significant construction
impact. The exempted regulation does
not concern the source term (i.e.,
potential amount of radiation in an
accident) nor mitigation. Thus, there is
no significant increase in the potential
for, or consequences of, a radiological
accident.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b) and (c)(25), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared in
connection with the approval of this
exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that, pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15 and 10
CFR 50.12, the exemption is authorized
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Jul 17, 2019
Jkt 247001
by law, will not present an undue risk
to the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the NRC hereby grants Exelon
Generation Company, LLC, a one-time
exemption for CPS, from 10 CFR
54.17(a) to allow the submittal of the
CPS license renewal application at least
3 years remaining prior to expiration of
the operating license while maintaining
the protection of the timely renewal
provision in 10 CFR 2.109(b).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of July 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Gregory F. Suber,
Deputy Director, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2019–15271 Filed 7–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Excepted Service; Consolidated
Listing of Schedules A, B, and C
Exceptions
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This provides the
consolidated notice of all agency
specific excepted authorities, approved
by the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM), under Schedule A, B, and C, as
of June 30, 2018, as required by Civil
Service Rule VI, Exceptions from the
Competitive Service.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Alford, Senior Executive Resources
Services, Senior Executive Service and
Performance Management, Employee
Services, 202–606–2246.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Civil
Service Rule VI (5 CFR 6.1) requires the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
to publish notice of exceptions granted
under Schedule A, B, and C. Under 5
CFR 213.103(a) it is required that all
Schedule A, B, and C appointing
authorities available for use by all
agencies to be published as regulations
in the Federal Register (FR) and the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Excepted appointing authorities
established solely for use by one
specific agency do not meet the
standard of general applicability
prescribed by the Federal Register Act
for regulations published in either the
FR or the CFR. Therefore, 5 CFR
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
213.103(b) requires monthly
publication, in the Notices section of the
Federal Register, of any Schedule A, B,
and C appointing authorities applicable
to a single agency. Under 5 CFR
213.103(c) it is required that a
consolidated listing of all Schedule A,
B, and C authorities, current as of June
30 of each year, be published annually
in the Notices section of the Federal
Register at www.federalregister.gov/
agencies/personnel-management-office.
That notice follows. Governmentwide
authorities codified in the CFR are not
printed in this notice.
When making appointments under an
agency-specific authority, agencies
should first list the appropriate
Schedule A, B, or C, followed by the
applicable number, for example:
Schedule A, 213.3104(x)(x). Agencies
are reminded that all excepted
authorities are subject to the provisions
of 5 CFR part 302 unless specifically
exempted by OPM at the time of
approval.
OPM maintains continuing
information on the status of all
Schedule A, B, and C appointing
authorities. Interested parties needing
information about specific authorities
during the year may obtain information
by writing to the Senior Executive
Resource Services, Office of Personnel
Management, 1900 E Street NW, Room
7412, Washington, DC 20415, or by
calling (202) 606–2246.
The following exceptions are current
as of June 30, 2018.
Schedule A
03. Executive Office of the President
(Sch. A, 213.3103)
(a) Office of Administration—
(1) Not to exceed 75 positions to
provide administrative services and
support to the White House Office.
(b) Office of Management and
Budget—
(1) Not to exceed 20 positions at
grades GS–5/15.
(2) Not to Exceed 34 positions that
require unique technical skills needed
for the re-designing and re-building of
digital interfaces between citizens,
businesses, and government as a part of
Smarter Information Technology
Delivery Initiative. This authority may
be used to make permanent, timelimited and temporary appointments to
Digital Services Expert positions (GS–
301) directly related to the
implementation of the Smarter
Information Technology Delivery
Initiative at the GS–14 to 15 level. No
new appointments may be made under
this authority after September 30, 2017.
(c) Council on Environmental
Quality—
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 138 (Thursday, July 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34410-34412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15271]
[[Page 34410]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-461; NRC-2019-0107]
Exelon Generation Company LLC; Clinton Power Station Unit 1
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a November 8, 2018, request from Exelon
Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) to allow Exelon to submit a sufficient
license renewal application for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1, at least
3 years prior to the expiration of the existing license and still
receive timely renewal protection.
DATES: The exemption was issued on July 11, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2019-0107 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and search for Docket ID NRC-2019-0107. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first
time that it is mentioned in this document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel S. Wiebe, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6606, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of July, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joel S. Wiebe,
Senior Project Manager, Licensing Projects Branch III, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
ATTACHMENT--Exemption
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Docket No. 50-461
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1
Exemption
I. Background
Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee), holds
Facility Operating License No. NPF-62, which authorizes operation of
the Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 (CPS), a boiling-water reactor
facility, located in Dewitt County, Illinois. The license, among other
things, subjects the facility to all rules, regulations, and orders of
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or
hereafter in effect. The current operating license for CPS expires on
April 17, 2027.
By letter dated November 8, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18312A139), Exelon requested
an exemption to allow Exelon to submit a license renewal application
for CPS at least 3 years prior to the expiration of the existing
license and, if found to be sufficient by the NRC, still receive timely
renewal protection under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.109(b). 10 CFR 2.109(b) provides timely
renewal protection to licensees that submit sufficient license renewal
applications at least 5 years before the expiration of the existing
license. In its application, Exelon informed the NRC that the economic
viability of continued operation of CPS beyond the current expiration
date of its NRC license is uncertain. According to Exelon, due to
continuing and significant changes in the economic and legislative
environments that materially affect continued CPS operation, Exelon
will not be in a position to make a reasonable and sound business
decision 5 years prior to the expiration of the CPS license as to
whether to pursue license renewal. Exelon contends that allowing it to
make that decision at a later date, when the economic viability of
extended CPS operation can be more readily assessed, will result in
more efficient use of both Exelon and NRC financial and other
resources.
II. Request/Action
10 CFR 54.17(a) requires that an application for a renewed license
be in accordance with Subpart A of 10 CFR, Part 2, which includes 10
CFR 2.109(b). In turn, 10 CFR 2.109(b) states, ``If the licensee of a
nuclear power plant licensed under 10 CFR 50.21(b) or 50.22 files a
sufficient application for renewal of either an operating license or a
combined license at least 5 years before the expiration of the existing
license, the existing license will not be deemed to have expired until
the application has been finally determined.'' In its letter dated
November 8, 2018, Exelon requested an exemption from 10 CFR 54.17(a) to
allow Exelon to submit its license renewal application for CPS at least
3 years prior to the expiration of the existing license and still
receive timely renewal protection under 2.109(b). 10 CFR 54.15 allows
exemptions from the requirements of Part 54 in accordance with 10 CFR
50.12.
III. Discussion
Under 10 CFR 54.15, exemptions from the requirements of Part 54 are
governed by 10 CFR 50.12. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative,
grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when (1) the
exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to
public health or safety, and are consistent with the common defense and
security; and (2) when special circumstances are present, as defined in
10 CFR 50.12(a)(2). In its application, Exelon stated that three
special circumstances apply to its request: 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii),
``[a]pplication of the regulation in the particular circumstances would
not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to
achieve the underlying purpose of the rule;'' 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii),
``[c]ompliance would result in undue hardship or other costs that are
significantly in excess of those contemplated when the regulation was
adopted, or that are significantly in excess of those incurred by
others similarly situated;'' and 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(vi), other material
circumstances not considered when the regulation was adopted are
present, such that granting the exemption is in the public interest.
[[Page 34411]]
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow Exelon to submit a license renewal
application for CPS at least 3 years prior to the expiration of its
existing license and, if sufficient, still receive timely renewal
protection under 10 CFR 2.109(b). 10 CFR 2.109 implements Section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 558(c), which
states:
When the licensee has made timely and sufficient application for
a renewal or a new license in accordance with agency rules, a
license with reference to an activity of a continuing nature does
not expire until the application has been finally determined by the
agency.
The 5-year time period specified in 10 CFR 2.109 is the result of a
discretionary agency rulemaking and not required by the APA. As stated
above, 10 CFR 54.15 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 54. The NRC has determined that granting
this exemption will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended, the APA, or the NRC's regulations. Therefore, the
exemption is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Presents no Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
The requested exemption to allow a 3-year time period, rather than
the 5 years specified in 10 CFR 2.109(b), for Exelon to submit a
sufficient license renewal application and receive timely renewal
protection is a scheduling change. The action does not change the
manner in which the plant operates and maintains public health and
safety because no additional changes are made as a result of the
action. The NRC expects that a period of 3 years provides sufficient
time for the NRC to perform a full and adequate safety and
environmental review, and for the completion of the hearing process.
Pending final action on the license renewal application, the NRC will
continue to conduct all regulatory activities associated with
licensing, inspection, and oversight, and will take whatever action may
be necessary to ensure adequate protection of the public health and
safety. The existence of this exemption does not affect NRC's
authority, applicable to all licenses, to modify, suspend, or revoke a
license for cause, such as a serious safety concern. Based on the
above, the NRC finds that the action does not cause undue risk to
public health and safety.
C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the Common Defense and Security
The requested exemption to allow for a timely renewal protection
deadline of at least 3 years instead of 5 years is a scheduling change.
The exemption does not change any site security matters. Therefore, the
NRC finds that the action is consistent with the common defense and
security.
D. Special Circumstances
The purpose of 10 CFR 2.109(b), as it is applied to nuclear power
reactors licensed by the NRC, is to implement the ``timely renewal''
provision of Section 9(b) of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), which states:
When the licensee has made timely and sufficient application for
a renewal or a new license in accordance with agency rules, a
license with reference to an activity of a continuing nature does
not expire until the application has been finally determined by the
agency.
The underlying purpose of this ``timely renewal'' provision in the
APA is to protect a licensee who is engaged in an ongoing licensed
activity and who has complied with agency rules in applying for a
renewed or new license from facing license expiration as the result of
delays in the administrative process.
On December 13, 1991, the NRC published the final license renewal
rule, 10 CFR, Part 54, with associated changes to 10 CFR, Parts 2, 50,
and 140, in the Federal Register (56 FR 64943). The statement of
considerations (SOC) discussed the basis for establishing the latest
date for filing license renewal applications and the timely renewal
doctrine (56 FR 64962). The SOC stated that:
Because the review of a renewal application will involve a
review of many complex technical issues, the NRC estimates that the
technical review would take approximately 2 years. Any necessary
hearing could likely add an additional year or more. Therefore, in
the proposed rule, the Commission modified Sec. 2.109 to require
that nuclear power plant operating license renewal applications be
submitted at least 3 years prior to their expiration in order to
take advantage of the timely renewal doctrine.
No specific comment was received concerning the proposal to add
a 3-year provision for the timely renewal provision for license
renewal. The current regulations require licensees to submit
decommissioning plans and related financial assurance information on
or about 5 years prior to the expiration of their operating
licenses. The Commission has concluded that, for consistency, the
deadline for submittal of a license renewal application should be 5
years prior to the expiration of the current operating license. The
timely renewal provisions of Sec. 2.109 now reflect the decision
that a 5-year time limit is more appropriate.
Thus, the NRC originally estimated that 3 years was needed to
review a renewal application and complete any hearing that might be
held on the application. The NRC changed its original estimate from 3
years to 5 years to have consistent deadlines for when licensees must
submit their decommissioning plans and when they must submit their
license renewal application to receive timely renewal protection. The
NRC's current schedule for review of license renewal applications is to
complete its review and make a decision on issuing the renewed license
within 22 months of receipt without a hearing. If a hearing is held,
the NRC's model schedule anticipates completion of the NRC's review,
the hearing process, and issuance of a decision on issuing the license
within 30 months of receipt.
However, it is recognized that the estimate of 30 months for
completion of a contested hearing is subject to variation in any given
proceeding. A period of 3 years (36 months), nevertheless, is expected
to provide sufficient time for performance of a full and adequate
safety and environmental review, and completion of the hearing process.
Meeting this schedule is based on a complete and sufficient application
being submitted and on the review being completed in accordance with
the NRC's established license renewal review schedule.
Based on the above, the NRC finds that the special circumstance of
10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) is present in the particular circumstances of
CPS.
It should be noted, among the key matters central to resolution of
issues associated with renewal of the operating license and also to the
application of the ``timely renewal'' doctrine is the submission of a
sufficient application. Completing the license renewal review process
on schedule is, of course, dependent on licensee cooperation in meeting
established schedules for submittal of any additional information
required by the NRC, and the resolution of all issues demonstrating
that issuance of a renewed license is warranted.
E. Environmental Considerations
The NRC's approval of the exemption to scheduling requirements
belongs to a category of actions that the NRC, by rule or regulation,
has declared to be a categorical exclusion, after first finding that
the category of actions does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Specifically, the
exemption is categorically excluded from further analysis under 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25).
Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), the granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation of chapter 10 is a categorical exclusion
[[Page 34412]]
provided that (i) there is no significant hazards consideration; (ii)
there is no significant change in the types or significant increase in
the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite; (iii) there
is no significant increase in individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure; (iv) there is no significant
construction impact; (v) there is no significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from radiological accidents; and (vi) the
requirements from which an exemption is sought involve certain
categories of requirements, including scheduling requirements.
The Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, has determined that the granting of the
exemption request involves no significant hazards consideration because
allowing the submittal of the license renewal application at least 3
years before the expiration of the existing license while maintaining
the protection of the timely renewal provision in 10 CFR 2.109(b) does
not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. The exemption constitutes a change to the schedule by
which Exelon must submit its license renewal application and still
receive timely renewal protection and, therefore, is unrelated to any
operational restriction. Accordingly, there is no significant change in
the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that
may be released offsite, and no significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure. The exempted
regulation is not associated with construction, so there is no
significant construction impact. The exempted regulation does not
concern the source term (i.e., potential amount of radiation in an
accident) nor mitigation. Thus, there is no significant increase in the
potential for, or consequences of, a radiological accident.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and (c)(25), no
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with the approval of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15
and 10 CFR 50.12, the exemption is authorized by law, will not present
an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with
the common defense and security. Also, special circumstances are
present. Therefore, the NRC hereby grants Exelon Generation Company,
LLC, a one-time exemption for CPS, from 10 CFR 54.17(a) to allow the
submittal of the CPS license renewal application at least 3 years
remaining prior to expiration of the operating license while
maintaining the protection of the timely renewal provision in 10 CFR
2.109(b).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of July 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Gregory F. Suber,
Deputy Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2019-15271 Filed 7-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P