Collecting Information About Citizenship Status in Connection With the Decennial Census, 33821-33825 [2019-15222]
Download as PDF
33821
Presidential Documents
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 136
Tuesday, July 16, 2019
Title 3—
Executive Order 13880 of July 11, 2019
The President
Collecting Information About Citizenship Status in Connection With the Decennial Census
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. In Department of Commerce v. New York, No. 18–
966 (June 27, 2019), the Supreme Court held that the Department of Commerce (Department) may, as a general matter, lawfully include a question
inquiring about citizenship status on the decennial census and, more specifically, declined to hold that the Secretary of Commerce’s decision to include
such a question on the 2020 decennial census was ‘‘substantively invalid.’’
That ruling was not surprising, given that every decennial census from
1820 to 2000 (with the single exception of 1840) asked at least some respondents about their citizenship status or place of birth. In addition, the Census
Bureau has inquired since 2005 about citizenship on the American Community Survey—a separate questionnaire sent annually to about 2.5 percent
of households.
The Court determined, however, that the explanation the Department had
provided for including such a question on the census was, in the circumstances of that case, insufficient to support the Department’s decision.
I disagree with the Court’s ruling, because I believe that the Department’s
decision was fully supported by the rationale presented on the record before
the Supreme Court.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESIDENTIAL DOCS
The Court’s ruling, however, has now made it impossible, as a practical
matter, to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census
questionnaire. After examining every possible alternative, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce have informed me that the logistics
and timing for carrying out the census, combined with delays from continuing
litigation, leave no practical mechanism for including the question on the
2020 decennial census.
Nevertheless, we shall ensure that accurate citizenship data is compiled
in connection with the census by other means. To achieve that goal, I
have determined that it is imperative that all executive departments and
agencies (agencies) provide the Department the maximum assistance permissible, consistent with law, in determining the number of citizens and noncitizens in the country, including by providing any access that the Department may request to administrative records that may be useful in accomplishing that objective. When the Secretary of Commerce decided to include
the citizenship question on the census, he determined that such a question,
in combination with administrative records, would provide the most accurate
and complete data. At that time, the Census Bureau had determined based
on experience that administrative records to which it had access would
enable it to determine citizenship status for approximately 90 percent of
the population. At that point, the benefits of using administrative records
were limited because the Department had not yet been able to access several
additional important sets of records with critical information on citizenship.
Under the Secretary of Commerce’s decision memorandum directing the
Census Bureau ‘‘to further enhance its administrative record data sets’’ and
‘‘to obtain as many additional Federal and state administrative records as
possible,’’ the Department has sought access to several such sets of records
maintained by other agencies, but it remains in negotiations to secure access.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\16JYE0.SGM
16JYE0
33822
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Presidential Documents
The executive action I am taking today will ensure that the Department
will have access to all available records in time for use in conjunction
with the census.
Therefore, to eliminate delays and uncertainty, and to resolve any doubt
about the duty of agencies to share data promptly with the Department,
I am hereby ordering all agencies to share information requested by the
Department to the maximum extent permissible under law.
Access to the additional data identified in section 3 of this order will
ensure that administrative records provide more accurate and complete citizenship data than was previously available.
I am also ordering the establishment of an interagency working group to
improve access to administrative records, with a goal of making available
to the Department administrative records showing citizenship data for 100
percent of the population. And I am ordering the Secretary of Commerce
to consider mechanisms for ensuring that the Department’s existing datagathering efforts expand the collection of citizenship data in the future.
Finally, I am directing the Department to strengthen its efforts, consistent
with law, to obtain State administrative records concerning citizenship.
Ensuring that the Department has available the best data on citizenship
that administrative records can provide, consistent with law, is important
for multiple reasons, including the following.
First, data on the number of citizens and aliens in the country is needed
to help us understand the effects of immigration on our country and to
inform policymakers considering basic decisions about immigration policy.
The Census Bureau has long maintained that citizenship data is one of
the statistics that is ‘‘essential for agencies and policy makers setting and
evaluating immigration policies and laws.’’
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESIDENTIAL DOCS
Today, an accurate understanding of the number of citizens and the number
of aliens in the country is central to any effort to reevaluate immigration
policy. The United States has not fundamentally restructured its immigration
system since 1965. I have explained many times that our outdated immigration laws no longer meet contemporary needs. My Administration is committed to modernizing immigration laws and policies, but the effort to undertake any fundamental reevaluation of immigration policy is hampered when
we do not have the most complete data about the number of citizens and
non-citizens in the country. If we are to undertake a genuine overhaul
of our immigration laws and evaluate policies for encouraging the assimilation of immigrants, one of the basic informational building blocks we should
know is how many non-citizens there are in the country.
Second, the lack of complete data on numbers of citizens and aliens hinders
the Federal Government’s ability to implement specific programs and to
evaluate policy proposals for changes in those programs. For example, the
lack of such data limits our ability to evaluate policies concerning certain
public benefits programs. It remains the immigration policy of the United
States, as embodied in statutes passed by the Congress, that ‘‘aliens within
the Nation’s borders [should] not depend on public resources to meet their
needs, but rather rely on their own capabilities and the resources of their
families, their sponsors, and private organizations’’ and that ‘‘the availability
of public benefits [should] not constitute an incentive for immigration to
the United States’’ (8 U.S.C. 1601(2)). The Congress has identified compelling
Government interests in restricting public benefits ‘‘in order to assure that
aliens be self-reliant in accordance with national immigration policy’’ and
‘‘to remove the incentive for illegal immigration provided by the availability
of public benefits’’ (8 U.S.C. 1601(5), (6)).
Accordingly, aliens are restricted from eligibility for many public benefits.
With limited exceptions, aliens are ineligible to receive supplemental security
income or food stamps (8 U.S.C. 1612(a)). Aliens who are ‘‘qualified aliens’’—
that is, lawful permanent residents, persons granted asylum, and certain
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\16JYE0.SGM
16JYE0
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Presidential Documents
33823
other legal immigrants—are, with limited exceptions, ineligible to receive
benefits through Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Medicaid, and
State Children’s Health Insurance Program for 5 years after entry into the
United States (8 U.S.C. 1613(a)). Aliens who are not ‘‘qualified aliens,’’
such as those unlawfully present, are generally ineligible for Federal benefits
and for State and local benefits (8 U.S.C. 1611(a), 1621(a)).
The lack of accurate information about the total citizen population makes
it difficult to plan for annual expenditures on certain benefits programs.
And the lack of accurate and complete data concerning the alien population
makes it extremely difficult to evaluate the potential effects of proposals
to alter the eligibility rules for public benefits.
Third, data identifying citizens will help the Federal Government generate
a more reliable count of the unauthorized alien population in the country.
Data tabulating both the overall population and the citizen population could
be combined with records of aliens lawfully present in the country to
generate an estimate of the aggregate number of aliens unlawfully present
in each State. Currently, the Department of Homeland Security generates
an annual estimate of the number of illegal aliens residing in the United
States, but its usefulness is limited by the deficiencies of the citizenship
data collected through the American Community Survey alone, which includes substantial margins of error because it is distributed to such a small
percentage of the population.
Academic researchers have also been unable to develop useful and reliable
numbers of our illegal alien population using currently available data. A
2018 study by researchers at Yale University estimated that the illegal alien
population totaled between 16.2 million and 29.5 million. Its modeling
put the likely number at about double the conventional estimate. The fact
is that we simply do not know how many citizens, non-citizens, and illegal
aliens are living in the United States.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESIDENTIAL DOCS
Accurate and complete data on the illegal alien population would be useful
for the Federal Government in evaluating many policy proposals. When
Members of Congress propose various forms of protected status for classes
of unauthorized immigrants, for example, the full implications of such proposals can be properly evaluated only with accurate information about the
overall number of unauthorized aliens potentially at issue. Similarly, such
information is needed to inform debate about legislative proposals to enhance
enforcement of immigration laws and effectuate duly issued removal orders.
The Federal Government’s need for a more accurate count of illegal aliens
in the country is only made more acute by the recent massive influx of
illegal immigrants at our southern border. In Proclamation 9822 of November
9, 2018 (Addressing Mass Migration Through the Southern Border of the
United States), I explained that our immigration and asylum system remains
in crisis as a consequence of the mass migration of aliens across our southern
border. As a result of our broken asylum laws, hundreds of thousands
of aliens who entered the country illegally have been released into the
interior of the United States pending the outcome of their removal proceedings. But because of the massive backlog of cases, hearing dates are
sometimes set years in the future and the adjudication process often takes
years to complete. Aliens not in custody routinely fail to appear in court
and, even if they do appear, fail to comply with removal orders. There
are more than 1 million illegal aliens who have been issued final removal
orders from immigration judges and yet remain at-large in the United States.
Efforts to find solutions that address the immense number of unauthorized
aliens living in our country should start with accurate information that
allows us to understand the true scope of the problem.
Fourth, it may be open to States to design State and local legislative districts
based on the population of voter-eligible citizens. In Evenwel v. Abbott,
136 S. Ct. 1120 (2016), the Supreme Court left open the question whether
‘‘States may draw districts to equalize voter-eligible population rather than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\16JYE0.SGM
16JYE0
33824
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Presidential Documents
total population.’’ Some States, such as Texas, have argued that ‘‘jurisdictions
may, consistent with the Equal Protection Clause, design districts using
any population baseline—including total population and voter-eligible population—so long as the choice is rational and not invidiously discriminatory’’.
Some courts, based on Supreme Court precedent, have agreed that State
districting plans may exclude individuals who are ineligible to vote. Whether
that approach is permissible will be resolved when a State actually proposes
a districting plan based on the voter-eligible population. But because eligibility to vote depends in part on citizenship, States could more effectively
exercise this option with a more accurate and complete count of the citizen
population.
The Department has said that if the officers or public bodies having initial
responsibility for the legislative districting in each State indicate a need
for tabulations of citizenship data, the Census Bureau will make a design
change to make such information available. I understand that some State
officials are interested in such data for districting purposes. This order
will assist the Department in securing the most accurate and complete
citizenship data so that it can respond to such requests from the States.
To be clear, generating accurate data concerning the total number of citizens,
non-citizens, and illegal aliens in the country has nothing to do with enforcing immigration laws against particular individuals. It is important, instead,
for making broad policy determinations. Information obtained by the Department in connection with the census through requests for administrative
records under 13 U.S.C. 6 shall be used solely to produce statistics and
is subject to confidentiality protections under Title 13 of the United States
Code. Information subject to confidentiality protections under Title 13 may
not, and shall not, be used to bring immigration enforcement actions against
particular individuals. Under my Administration, the data confidentiality
protections in Title 13 shall be fully respected.
Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to develop complete
and accurate data on the number of citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens
in the country. Such data is necessary to understand the effects of immigration on the country, and to inform policymakers in setting and evaluating
immigration policies and laws, including evaluating proposals to address
the current crisis in illegal immigration.
Sec. 3. Assistance to the Department of Commerce and Maximizing Citizenship Data. (a) All agencies shall promptly provide the Department the maximum assistance permissible, consistent with law, in determining the number
of citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens in the country, including by
providing any access that the Department may request to administrative
records that may be useful in accomplishing that objective. In particular,
the following agencies shall examine relevant legal authorities and, to the
maximum extent consistent with law, provide access to the following records:
(i) Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services—National-level file of Lawful Permanent Residents, Naturalizations;
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESIDENTIAL DOCS
(ii) Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement—F1 & M1 Nonimmigrant Visas;
(iii) Department of Homeland Security—National-level file of Customs and
Border Arrival/Departure transaction data;
(iv) Department of Homeland Security and Department of State, Worldwide
Refugee and Asylum Processing System—Refugee and Asylum visas;
(v) Department of State—National-level passport application data;
(vi) Social Security Administration—Master Beneficiary Records; and
(vii) Department of Health and Human Services—CMS Medicaid and CHIP
Information System.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\16JYE0.SGM
16JYE0
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Presidential Documents
33825
(b) The Secretary of Commerce shall instruct the Director of the Census
Bureau to establish an interagency working group to coordinate efforts, consistent with law, to maximize the availability of administrative records in
connection with the census, with the goal of obtaining administrative records
that can help establish citizenship status for 100 percent of the population.
The Director of the Census Bureau shall chair the working group, and
the head of each agency shall designate a representative to the working
group upon request from the working group chair.
(c) To ensure that the Federal Government continues to collect the most
accurate information available concerning citizenship going forward, the
Secretary of Commerce shall consider initiating any administrative process
necessary to include a citizenship question on the 2030 decennial census
and to consider any regulatory changes necessary to ensure that citizenship
data is collected in any other surveys and data-gathering efforts conducted
by the Census Bureau, including the American Community Survey. The
Secretary of Commerce shall also consider expanding the distribution of
the American Community Survey, which currently reaches approximately
2.5 percent of households, to secure better citizenship data.
(d) The Department shall strengthen its efforts, consistent with law, to
gain access to relevant State administrative records.
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed
to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency,
or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and
subject to the availability of appropriations.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 11, 2019.
[FR Doc. 2019–15222
Filed 7–15–19; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3295–F9–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jul 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\16JYE0.SGM
16JYE0
Trump.EPS
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESIDENTIAL DOCS
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party
against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers,
employees, or agents, or any other person.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2019)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 33821-33825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15222]
Presidential Documents
Federal Register / Vol. 84 , No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 /
Presidential Documents
___________________________________________________________________
Title 3--
The President
[[Page 33821]]
Executive Order 13880 of July 11, 2019
Collecting Information About Citizenship Status
in Connection With the Decennial Census
By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. In Department of Commerce v. New
York, No. 18-966 (June 27, 2019), the Supreme Court
held that the Department of Commerce (Department) may,
as a general matter, lawfully include a question
inquiring about citizenship status on the decennial
census and, more specifically, declined to hold that
the Secretary of Commerce's decision to include such a
question on the 2020 decennial census was
``substantively invalid.'' That ruling was not
surprising, given that every decennial census from 1820
to 2000 (with the single exception of 1840) asked at
least some respondents about their citizenship status
or place of birth. In addition, the Census Bureau has
inquired since 2005 about citizenship on the American
Community Survey--a separate questionnaire sent
annually to about 2.5 percent of households.
The Court determined, however, that the explanation the
Department had provided for including such a question
on the census was, in the circumstances of that case,
insufficient to support the Department's decision. I
disagree with the Court's ruling, because I believe
that the Department's decision was fully supported by
the rationale presented on the record before the
Supreme Court.
The Court's ruling, however, has now made it
impossible, as a practical matter, to include a
citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census
questionnaire. After examining every possible
alternative, the Attorney General and the Secretary of
Commerce have informed me that the logistics and timing
for carrying out the census, combined with delays from
continuing litigation, leave no practical mechanism for
including the question on the 2020 decennial census.
Nevertheless, we shall ensure that accurate citizenship
data is compiled in connection with the census by other
means. To achieve that goal, I have determined that it
is imperative that all executive departments and
agencies (agencies) provide the Department the maximum
assistance permissible, consistent with law, in
determining the number of citizens and non-citizens in
the country, including by providing any access that the
Department may request to administrative records that
may be useful in accomplishing that objective. When the
Secretary of Commerce decided to include the
citizenship question on the census, he determined that
such a question, in combination with administrative
records, would provide the most accurate and complete
data. At that time, the Census Bureau had determined
based on experience that administrative records to
which it had access would enable it to determine
citizenship status for approximately 90 percent of the
population. At that point, the benefits of using
administrative records were limited because the
Department had not yet been able to access several
additional important sets of records with critical
information on citizenship. Under the Secretary of
Commerce's decision memorandum directing the Census
Bureau ``to further enhance its administrative record
data sets'' and ``to obtain as many additional Federal
and state administrative records as possible,'' the
Department has sought access to several such sets of
records maintained by other agencies, but it remains in
negotiations to secure access.
[[Page 33822]]
The executive action I am taking today will ensure that
the Department will have access to all available
records in time for use in conjunction with the census.
Therefore, to eliminate delays and uncertainty, and to
resolve any doubt about the duty of agencies to share
data promptly with the Department, I am hereby ordering
all agencies to share information requested by the
Department to the maximum extent permissible under law.
Access to the additional data identified in section 3
of this order will ensure that administrative records
provide more accurate and complete citizenship data
than was previously available.
I am also ordering the establishment of an interagency
working group to improve access to administrative
records, with a goal of making available to the
Department administrative records showing citizenship
data for 100 percent of the population. And I am
ordering the Secretary of Commerce to consider
mechanisms for ensuring that the Department's existing
data-gathering efforts expand the collection of
citizenship data in the future.
Finally, I am directing the Department to strengthen
its efforts, consistent with law, to obtain State
administrative records concerning citizenship.
Ensuring that the Department has available the best
data on citizenship that administrative records can
provide, consistent with law, is important for multiple
reasons, including the following.
First, data on the number of citizens and aliens in the
country is needed to help us understand the effects of
immigration on our country and to inform policymakers
considering basic decisions about immigration policy.
The Census Bureau has long maintained that citizenship
data is one of the statistics that is ``essential for
agencies and policy makers setting and evaluating
immigration policies and laws.''
Today, an accurate understanding of the number of
citizens and the number of aliens in the country is
central to any effort to reevaluate immigration policy.
The United States has not fundamentally restructured
its immigration system since 1965. I have explained
many times that our outdated immigration laws no longer
meet contemporary needs. My Administration is committed
to modernizing immigration laws and policies, but the
effort to undertake any fundamental reevaluation of
immigration policy is hampered when we do not have the
most complete data about the number of citizens and
non-citizens in the country. If we are to undertake a
genuine overhaul of our immigration laws and evaluate
policies for encouraging the assimilation of
immigrants, one of the basic informational building
blocks we should know is how many non-citizens there
are in the country.
Second, the lack of complete data on numbers of
citizens and aliens hinders the Federal Government's
ability to implement specific programs and to evaluate
policy proposals for changes in those programs. For
example, the lack of such data limits our ability to
evaluate policies concerning certain public benefits
programs. It remains the immigration policy of the
United States, as embodied in statutes passed by the
Congress, that ``aliens within the Nation's borders
[should] not depend on public resources to meet their
needs, but rather rely on their own capabilities and
the resources of their families, their sponsors, and
private organizations'' and that ``the availability of
public benefits [should] not constitute an incentive
for immigration to the United States'' (8 U.S.C.
1601(2)). The Congress has identified compelling
Government interests in restricting public benefits
``in order to assure that aliens be self-reliant in
accordance with national immigration policy'' and ``to
remove the incentive for illegal immigration provided
by the availability of public benefits'' (8 U.S.C.
1601(5), (6)).
Accordingly, aliens are restricted from eligibility for
many public benefits. With limited exceptions, aliens
are ineligible to receive supplemental security income
or food stamps (8 U.S.C. 1612(a)). Aliens who are
``qualified aliens''--that is, lawful permanent
residents, persons granted asylum, and certain
[[Page 33823]]
other legal immigrants--are, with limited exceptions,
ineligible to receive benefits through Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families, Medicaid, and State
Children's Health Insurance Program for 5 years after
entry into the United States (8 U.S.C. 1613(a)). Aliens
who are not ``qualified aliens,'' such as those
unlawfully present, are generally ineligible for
Federal benefits and for State and local benefits (8
U.S.C. 1611(a), 1621(a)).
The lack of accurate information about the total
citizen population makes it difficult to plan for
annual expenditures on certain benefits programs. And
the lack of accurate and complete data concerning the
alien population makes it extremely difficult to
evaluate the potential effects of proposals to alter
the eligibility rules for public benefits.
Third, data identifying citizens will help the Federal
Government generate a more reliable count of the
unauthorized alien population in the country. Data
tabulating both the overall population and the citizen
population could be combined with records of aliens
lawfully present in the country to generate an estimate
of the aggregate number of aliens unlawfully present in
each State. Currently, the Department of Homeland
Security generates an annual estimate of the number of
illegal aliens residing in the United States, but its
usefulness is limited by the deficiencies of the
citizenship data collected through the American
Community Survey alone, which includes substantial
margins of error because it is distributed to such a
small percentage of the population.
Academic researchers have also been unable to develop
useful and reliable numbers of our illegal alien
population using currently available data. A 2018 study
by researchers at Yale University estimated that the
illegal alien population totaled between 16.2 million
and 29.5 million. Its modeling put the likely number at
about double the conventional estimate. The fact is
that we simply do not know how many citizens, non-
citizens, and illegal aliens are living in the United
States.
Accurate and complete data on the illegal alien
population would be useful for the Federal Government
in evaluating many policy proposals. When Members of
Congress propose various forms of protected status for
classes of unauthorized immigrants, for example, the
full implications of such proposals can be properly
evaluated only with accurate information about the
overall number of unauthorized aliens potentially at
issue. Similarly, such information is needed to inform
debate about legislative proposals to enhance
enforcement of immigration laws and effectuate duly
issued removal orders.
The Federal Government's need for a more accurate count
of illegal aliens in the country is only made more
acute by the recent massive influx of illegal
immigrants at our southern border. In Proclamation 9822
of November 9, 2018 (Addressing Mass Migration Through
the Southern Border of the United States), I explained
that our immigration and asylum system remains in
crisis as a consequence of the mass migration of aliens
across our southern border. As a result of our broken
asylum laws, hundreds of thousands of aliens who
entered the country illegally have been released into
the interior of the United States pending the outcome
of their removal proceedings. But because of the
massive backlog of cases, hearing dates are sometimes
set years in the future and the adjudication process
often takes years to complete. Aliens not in custody
routinely fail to appear in court and, even if they do
appear, fail to comply with removal orders. There are
more than 1 million illegal aliens who have been issued
final removal orders from immigration judges and yet
remain at-large in the United States.
Efforts to find solutions that address the immense
number of unauthorized aliens living in our country
should start with accurate information that allows us
to understand the true scope of the problem.
Fourth, it may be open to States to design State and
local legislative districts based on the population of
voter-eligible citizens. In Evenwel v. Abbott, 136 S.
Ct. 1120 (2016), the Supreme Court left open the
question whether ``States may draw districts to
equalize voter-eligible population rather than
[[Page 33824]]
total population.'' Some States, such as Texas, have
argued that ``jurisdictions may, consistent with the
Equal Protection Clause, design districts using any
population baseline--including total population and
voter-eligible population--so long as the choice is
rational and not invidiously discriminatory''. Some
courts, based on Supreme Court precedent, have agreed
that State districting plans may exclude individuals
who are ineligible to vote. Whether that approach is
permissible will be resolved when a State actually
proposes a districting plan based on the voter-eligible
population. But because eligibility to vote depends in
part on citizenship, States could more effectively
exercise this option with a more accurate and complete
count of the citizen population.
The Department has said that if the officers or public
bodies having initial responsibility for the
legislative districting in each State indicate a need
for tabulations of citizenship data, the Census Bureau
will make a design change to make such information
available. I understand that some State officials are
interested in such data for districting purposes. This
order will assist the Department in securing the most
accurate and complete citizenship data so that it can
respond to such requests from the States.
To be clear, generating accurate data concerning the
total number of citizens, non-citizens, and illegal
aliens in the country has nothing to do with enforcing
immigration laws against particular individuals. It is
important, instead, for making broad policy
determinations. Information obtained by the Department
in connection with the census through requests for
administrative records under 13 U.S.C. 6 shall be used
solely to produce statistics and is subject to
confidentiality protections under Title 13 of the
United States Code. Information subject to
confidentiality protections under Title 13 may not, and
shall not, be used to bring immigration enforcement
actions against particular individuals. Under my
Administration, the data confidentiality protections in
Title 13 shall be fully respected.
Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States
to develop complete and accurate data on the number of
citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens in the
country. Such data is necessary to understand the
effects of immigration on the country, and to inform
policymakers in setting and evaluating immigration
policies and laws, including evaluating proposals to
address the current crisis in illegal immigration.
Sec. 3. Assistance to the Department of Commerce and
Maximizing Citizenship Data. (a) All agencies shall
promptly provide the Department the maximum assistance
permissible, consistent with law, in determining the
number of citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens in
the country, including by providing any access that the
Department may request to administrative records that
may be useful in accomplishing that objective. In
particular, the following agencies shall examine
relevant legal authorities and, to the maximum extent
consistent with law, provide access to the following
records:
(i) Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services--National-level file of Lawful Permanent Residents,
Naturalizations;
(ii) Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement--
F1 & M1 Nonimmigrant Visas;
(iii) Department of Homeland Security--National-level file of Customs and
Border Arrival/Departure transaction data;
(iv) Department of Homeland Security and Department of State, Worldwide
Refugee and Asylum Processing System--Refugee and Asylum visas;
(v) Department of State--National-level passport application data;
(vi) Social Security Administration--Master Beneficiary Records; and
(vii) Department of Health and Human Services--CMS Medicaid and CHIP
Information System.
[[Page 33825]]
(b) The Secretary of Commerce shall instruct the
Director of the Census Bureau to establish an
interagency working group to coordinate efforts,
consistent with law, to maximize the availability of
administrative records in connection with the census,
with the goal of obtaining administrative records that
can help establish citizenship status for 100 percent
of the population. The Director of the Census Bureau
shall chair the working group, and the head of each
agency shall designate a representative to the working
group upon request from the working group chair.
(c) To ensure that the Federal Government continues
to collect the most accurate information available
concerning citizenship going forward, the Secretary of
Commerce shall consider initiating any administrative
process necessary to include a citizenship question on
the 2030 decennial census and to consider any
regulatory changes necessary to ensure that citizenship
data is collected in any other surveys and data-
gathering efforts conducted by the Census Bureau,
including the American Community Survey. The Secretary
of Commerce shall also consider expanding the
distribution of the American Community Survey, which
currently reaches approximately 2.5 percent of
households, to secure better citizenship data.
(d) The Department shall strengthen its efforts,
consistent with law, to gain access to relevant State
administrative records.
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order
shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or
the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with
applicable law and subject to the availability of
appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not,
create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law or in equity by any party against
the United States, its departments, agencies, or
entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any
other person.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 11, 2019.
[FR Doc. 2019-15222
Filed 7-15-19; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3295-F9-P