Safety Zone; Ohio River, Portsmouth, OH, 33880-33881 [2019-15102]
Download as PDF
33880
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Standard size dishwashers with a
‘‘normal cycle’’, as defined in section
1.12 of appendix C1 in subpart B of this
part, of 60 minutes or less are not
currently subject to energy or water
conservation standards.
*
(2) [Reserved].
*
*
*
telephone 304–733–0198, email
Wesley.P.Cornelius@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
*
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
[FR Doc. 2019–14545 Filed 7–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0552]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River, Portsmouth,
OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Ohio River from
Mile Marker (MM) 355.8 to MM 356.8.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable
waters near Portsmouth, OH, during a
firework display on September 1, 2019.
This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from being
in the safety zone unless otherwise
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Ohio Valley or designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2019–0552 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email MST3 Wesley
Cornelius, Waterways Management,
MSU Huntington, U.S Coast Guard;
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jul 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
On May 8, 2019, Hamburg Fireworks
notified the Coast Guard that it would
be conducting a firework display from
the Kentucky Shoreline to
commemorate the Labor Day from 10
p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on September 1,
2019. Hazards from the fireworks
display include accidental discharge of
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and
falling hot embers and other debris. The
Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the fireworks to
be used in this display would be a safety
concern for anyone within the Safety
Zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of persons on these
navigable waters within half of a
nautical mile up-river and down-river of
the launch site before, during, and after
the scheduled event. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under the
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously
33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
temporary safety zone from 10 p.m. to
10:30 p.m. on September 1, 2019. The
safety zone would cover all navigable
waters from Ohio River Mile Marker
(MM) 355.8 to MM 356.8. The duration
of the regulation is intended to ensure
the safety of life on these navigable
waters before, during, and after the
scheduled regatta. No person would be
permitted to enter the area without
obtaining approval from the COTP or a
designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on size, location, and duration
of the safety zone. The safety zone will
be enforced on a small area of the Ohio
River from 10 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on
September 1, 2019. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small
entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01 and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jul 15, 2019
Jkt 247001
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone lasting 0.5 hours
that would prohibit entry from Ohio
River MM 355.8 to MM 356.8. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L60(a) in Table 3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures 5090.1. A preliminary
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
33881
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security Measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0552 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0552 Safety Zone; Ohio River,
Portsmouth, OH
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Ohio River from Mile Marker (MM)
355.8 to MM 356.8 near Portsmouth,
OH.
(b) Period of enforcement. This
section will be enforced from 10 p.m.
through 10:30 p.m. on September 1,
2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP)
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter the
temporary zone, contact the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
The COTP or designated representative
may be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or
16 or at 1–800–253–7565. Those in the
safety zone must comply with all lawful
orders or directions given to them by the
COTP or the COTP’s designated
representative.
Dated: July 10, 2019.
A. M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2019–15102 Filed 7–15–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33880-33881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15102]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0552]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River, Portsmouth, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone for certain waters of the Ohio River from Mile Marker (MM) 355.8
to MM 356.8. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life
on these navigable waters near Portsmouth, OH, during a firework
display on September 1, 2019. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless otherwise
authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or designated
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0552 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email MST3 Wesley Cornelius, Waterways
Management, MSU Huntington, U.S Coast Guard; telephone 304-733-0198,
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On May 8, 2019, Hamburg Fireworks notified the Coast Guard that it
would be conducting a firework display from the Kentucky Shoreline to
commemorate the Labor Day from 10 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on September 1,
2019. Hazards from the fireworks display include accidental discharge
of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers and other
debris. The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be
used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within the
Safety Zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of persons
on these navigable waters within half of a nautical mile up-river and
down-river of the launch site before, during, and after the scheduled
event. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under the authority
in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a temporary safety zone from 10
p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on September 1, 2019. The safety zone would cover
all navigable waters from Ohio River Mile Marker (MM) 355.8 to MM
356.8. The duration of the regulation is intended to ensure the safety
of life on these navigable waters before, during, and after the
scheduled regatta. No person would be permitted to enter the area
without obtaining approval from the COTP or a designated
representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end
of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on size, location,
and duration of the safety zone. The safety zone will be enforced on a
small area of the Ohio River from 10 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on September 1,
2019. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions
[[Page 33881]]
concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting 0.5 hours that would prohibit entry from Ohio River MM
355.8 to MM 356.8. Normally such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L60(a) in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast
Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0552 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0552 Safety Zone; Ohio River, Portsmouth, OH
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Ohio River from Mile Marker (MM) 355.8 to MM 356.8 near
Portsmouth, OH.
(b) Period of enforcement. This section will be enforced from 10
p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on September 1, 2019.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or the COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter the temporary zone, contact the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative. The COTP or designated
representative may be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16 or at 1-800-
253-7565. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
Dated: July 10, 2019.
A. M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2019-15102 Filed 7-15-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P