Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Idaho; Regional Haze Progress Report, 33697-33699 [2019-14988]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
adding in its place the words ‘‘activities
of daily living and instrumental
activities of daily living’’; and
■ b. Removing the statutory authority
citation at the end of the section.
■ 3. Revise § 17.62 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
§ 17.62
Definitions.
For the purpose of §§ 17.61 through
17.72:
Activities of daily living means basic
daily tasks an individual performs as
part of self-care which may be used as
a measurement of the functional status
of a person including: Walking; bathing,
shaving, brushing teeth, combing hair;
dressing; eating; getting in or getting out
of bed; and toileting.
Approving official means the Director
or, if designated by the Director, the
Associate Director or Chief of Staff of a
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical
Center or Outpatient Clinic which has
jurisdiction to approve a community
residential care facility.
Community residential care means
the monitoring, supervision, and
assistance, in accordance with a
statement of needed care, of the
activities of daily living activities and
instrumental activities of daily living, of
referred veterans in an approved home
in the community by the facility’s
provider.
Hearing official means the Director or,
if designated by the Director, the
Associate Director or Chief of Staff of a
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical
Center or Outpatient Clinic which has
jurisdiction to approve a community
residential care facility.
Instrumental activities of daily living
are tasks that are not necessary for
fundamental functioning, but allow an
individual to live independently in a
community. Instrumental activities of
daily living include: Housekeeping and
cleaning room; meal preparation; taking
medications; laundry; assistance with
transportation; shopping—for groceries,
clothing or other items; ability to use the
telephone; ability to manage finances;
writing letters; and obtaining
appointments.
Oral hearing means the in person
testimony of representatives of a
community residential care facility and
of VA before the hearing official and the
review of the written evidence of record
by that official.
Paper hearing means a review of the
written evidence of record by the
hearing official.
■ 4. Amend § 17.63 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (b);
■ b. Revising paragraph (k); and
■ c. Removing the statutory authority
citation at the end of the section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:41 Jul 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
The addition and revision read as
follows:
§ 17.63 Approval of community residential
care facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Level of care. The community
residential care facility must provide the
resident, at a minimum, a base level of
care to include room and board;
nutrition consisting of three meals per
day and two snacks, or as required to
meet special dietary needs; laundry
services; transportation (either provided
or arranged) to VA and healthcare
appointments; and accompanying the
resident to appointments if needed; 24hour supervision, if indicated; and care,
supervision, and assistance with
activities of daily living and
instrumental activities of daily living. In
those cases where the resident requires
more than a base level of care, the
medically appropriate level of care must
be provided.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Cost of community residential
care. (1) Payment for the charges of
community residential care is not the
responsibility of the United States
Government or VA.
(2) The cost of community residential
care should reflect the cost of providing
the base level of care as defined in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(3) The resident or an authorized
personal representative and a
representative of the community
residential care facility must agree upon
the charge and payment procedures for
community residential care. Any
agreement between the resident or an
authorized personal representative and
the community residential care facility
must be approved by the approving
official. The charge for care in a
community residential care facility must
be reviewed annually by the facility and
VA, or as required due to changes in
care needs.
(4) The charges for community
residential care must be reasonable and
comparable to the current average rate
for residential care in the State or
Region for the same level of care
provided to the resident.
Notwithstanding, any year to year
increase in the charge for care in a
community residential care facility for
the same level of care may not exceed
the annual percentage increase in the
National Consumer Price Index (CPI) for
that year. In establishing an individual
residential rate, consideration should be
given to the level of care required and
the individual needs of the resident.
The approving official may approve a
rate:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33697
(i) Lower than the current average rate
for residential care in the State or
Region for the same level of care if the
community residential care facility and
the resident or authorized personal
representative agreed to such rate,
provided such lower rate does not result
in a lower level of care than the resident
requires;
(ii) higher than the current average
rate for residential care in the State or
Region for the same level of care if the
community residential care facility and
the resident or authorized personal
representative agreed to such rate, and
the higher rate is related to the
individual needs of the resident which
exceed the base level of care as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
Examples of services which exceed the
base level of care include, but are not
limited to, handling disbursement of
funds solely at the request of the
resident; fulfilling special dietary
requests by the resident or family
member; accompanying the resident to
an activity center; assisting in or
providing scheduled socialization
activities; supervision of an unsafe
smoker; bowel and bladder care;
intervention related to behavioral
issues; and transportation other than for
VA and healthcare appointments.
(5) The approving official may
approve a deviation from the
requirements of paragraph (k)(4) of this
section if the resident chooses to pay
more for care at a facility which exceeds
the base level of care as defined in
paragraph (b) of this section
notwithstanding the resident’s needs.
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 17.64 through 17.74
[Amended]
5. Amend §§ 17.64 through 17.74 by
removing the statutory authority citation
at the end of each section.
■
[FR Doc. 2019–14918 Filed 7–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2017–0571; FRL–9996–57–
Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; Idaho; Regional
Haze Progress Report
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
33698
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
the Idaho Regional Haze State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State on June 28, 2016. Idaho
submitted its Regional Haze Progress
Report (‘‘progress report’’ or ‘‘report’’)
and a negative declaration stating that
further revision of the existing regional
haze SIP is not needed at this time.
Idaho submitted both the progress
report and the negative declaration in
the form of implementation plan
revisions as required by Federal
regulations. The progress report
addresses the Federal Regional Haze
Rule requirements under the Clean Air
Act to submit a report describing
progress in achieving reasonable
progress goals established for regional
haze and a determination of the
adequacy of the State’s existing plan
addressing regional haze.
DATES: This action is effective on
August 14, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2017–0571. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Chi (206) 553–1185, chi.john@epa.gov,
EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 155, Seattle, Washington 98101.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
I. Background Information
On April 5, 2019, the EPA proposed
to approve Idaho’s Regional Haze
Progress Report (84 FR 13582). An
explanation of the Clean Air Act
requirements, a detailed analysis of the
submittal, and the EPA’s reasons for
proposing approval were provided in
the notice of proposed rulemaking, and
will not be restated here. The public
comment period for the proposal ended
May 6, 2019. We received no comments
on our proposed rulemaking. We note
that, in the preamble of our proposed
rulemaking, we made two typographical
errors. In our summary of Idaho’s
submittal, we labeled ‘‘Selway-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:41 Jul 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
Bitterroot Wilderness’’ as ‘‘Hells Canyon
Wilderness’’ by mistake in two places
(84 FR 13582, at page 13582, column 3;
and page 13583, column 1). These errors
in our description of Idaho’s submittal
are minor and do not impact the
approvability of Idaho’s Regional Haze
Progress Report. We also provided
Idaho’s full submittal in the docket for
the action. Therefore, we are finalizing
our action as proposed.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the Idaho
Regional Haze Progress Report,
submitted on June 28, 2016, as meeting
the applicable requirements of the Clean
Air Act and the Federal Regional Haze
Rule, as set forth in 40 CFR 51.308(g).
The EPA has determined that the
existing regional haze SIP is adequate to
meet the State’s visibility goals and
requires no substantive revision at this
time, as set forth in 40 CFR 51.308(h).
We have also determined that Idaho
fulfilled the requirements in 40 CFR
51.308(i) regarding State coordination
with Federal Land Managers.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s
role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 13,
2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
33699
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Visibility,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N—Idaho
Dated: June 27, 2019.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry at the
end of the table for ‘‘Regional Haze 5Year Progress Report’’ to read as
follows:
■
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
§ 52.670
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Name of SIP provision
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
State
submittal date
*
*
Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report ........
*
State-wide ......
*
6/28/2016
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
DATES:
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
ADDRESSES:
This final rule is effective on July
15, 2019.
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0035; FRL–9996–18–
Region 5]
Revision of Sheboygan County,
Wisconsin Nonattainment Designation
for the 1997 and 2008 Ozone Standards
and Clean Data Determination for the
2008 Ozone Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a request
from Wisconsin to revise the
designation for the Sheboygan
nonattainment area for the 1997 primary
and secondary ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the
2008 primary and secondary ozone
NAAQS, by splitting the existing area
into two distinct nonattainment areas
that together cover the identical
geographic area of the existing
nonattainment area. This revised
designation is supported by air quality
data, emissions and emissions-related
data, meteorology, geography/
topography, and jurisdictional
boundaries. Both areas will retain their
nonattainment designation and
Moderate classification. In this action,
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:41 Jul 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
*
*
7/15/2019, [Insert Federal Register citation].
EPA is also making a clean data
determination for one of the two
separate areas for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2019–14988 Filed 7–12–19; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
EPA approval date
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0035. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either through
www.regulations.gov or at the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Eric
Svingen, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–4489 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
Eric
Svingen, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
*
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–4489,
svingen.eric@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this final rule?
II. What comments did EPA receive?
III. What actions is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this final
rule?
On July 18, 1997, EPA revised the
former 1-hour ozone primary and
secondary standards and replaced them
with 8-hour standards at a level of 0.08
parts per million (ppm) (40 CFR 50.10).
On March 27, 2008, EPA further revised
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by lowering
the level of the primary and secondary
standards from 0.08 ppm to 0.075 ppm
(40 CFR 50.15).
On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858), and
May 21, 2012 (77 FR 30088), EPA
designated the entirety of Sheboygan
County in Wisconsin as nonattainment
for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and 2008
ozone NAAQS, respectively.
On March 1, 2011, EPA determined
that the Sheboygan nonattainment area
had attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS (76
FR 11080). Since that determination, the
area has continued to attain the 1997
ozone NAAQS, and the area retains its
Moderate classification. On December
19, 2016, EPA reclassified the
Sheboygan nonattainment area for the
2008 ozone NAAQS as Moderate with
an attainment date of July 20, 2018 (81
E:\FR\FM\15JYR1.SGM
15JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 135 (Monday, July 15, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33697-33699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14988]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2017-0571; FRL-9996-57-Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Idaho;
Regional Haze Progress Report
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
revision to
[[Page 33698]]
the Idaho Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State on June 28, 2016. Idaho submitted its Regional Haze Progress
Report (``progress report'' or ``report'') and a negative declaration
stating that further revision of the existing regional haze SIP is not
needed at this time. Idaho submitted both the progress report and the
negative declaration in the form of implementation plan revisions as
required by Federal regulations. The progress report addresses the
Federal Regional Haze Rule requirements under the Clean Air Act to
submit a report describing progress in achieving reasonable progress
goals established for regional haze and a determination of the adequacy
of the State's existing plan addressing regional haze.
DATES: This action is effective on August 14, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2017-0571. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Chi (206) 553-1185,
[email protected], EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle,
Washington 98101.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
I. Background Information
On April 5, 2019, the EPA proposed to approve Idaho's Regional Haze
Progress Report (84 FR 13582). An explanation of the Clean Air Act
requirements, a detailed analysis of the submittal, and the EPA's
reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of proposed
rulemaking, and will not be restated here. The public comment period
for the proposal ended May 6, 2019. We received no comments on our
proposed rulemaking. We note that, in the preamble of our proposed
rulemaking, we made two typographical errors. In our summary of Idaho's
submittal, we labeled ``Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness'' as ``Hells
Canyon Wilderness'' by mistake in two places (84 FR 13582, at page
13582, column 3; and page 13583, column 1). These errors in our
description of Idaho's submittal are minor and do not impact the
approvability of Idaho's Regional Haze Progress Report. We also
provided Idaho's full submittal in the docket for the action.
Therefore, we are finalizing our action as proposed.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the Idaho Regional Haze Progress Report,
submitted on June 28, 2016, as meeting the applicable requirements of
the Clean Air Act and the Federal Regional Haze Rule, as set forth in
40 CFR 51.308(g). The EPA has determined that the existing regional
haze SIP is adequate to meet the State's visibility goals and requires
no substantive revision at this time, as set forth in 40 CFR 51.308(h).
We have also determined that Idaho fulfilled the requirements in 40 CFR
51.308(i) regarding State coordination with Federal Land Managers.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 13, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time
[[Page 33699]]
within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Visibility, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 27, 2019.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry at the end of the table for ``Regional Haze 5-Year Progress
Report'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic State
Name of SIP provision or nonattainment area submittal date EPA approval date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Regional Haze 5-Year Progress State-wide........... 6/28/2016 7/15/2019, [Insert
Report. Federal Register
citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-14988 Filed 7-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
