Regulations and Procedures Under the Plant Variety Protection Act, 33176-33182 [2019-14799]
Download as PDF
33176
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 97
[Document Number AMS–ST–19–0004]
RIN 0581–AD86
Regulations and Procedures Under the
Plant Variety Protection Act
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Comments are invited on
proposed revisions to the regulations,
fees for services, and procedures
established under the Plant Variety
Protection Act. The proposed revisions
are needed to conform with recent
amendments to the Plant Variety
Protection Act, which added authority
for the Plant Variety Protection Office to
issue certificates of protection for
varieties of plants that are reproduced
asexually. The proposed rule would add
references to the term ‘‘asexual
reproduction’’ to the regulations
established under the Act. The proposed
rule would also modernize the
regulations by simplifying the fee
schedule for PVPO services and
updating the regulations relating to
administrative procedures to reflect
current business practices.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by September 10,
2019.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. All
comments must be submitted through
the Federal e-rulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov and should
reference the document number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register. All comments
submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffery Haynes, Deputy Commissioner,
Plant Variety Protection Office, AMS
Science and Technology Program,
USDA; 1400 Independence Avenue SW,
Room 4512–S, Stop 0274, Washington,
DC 20250–0002; telephone: (202) 260–
8983; email: Jeffery.Haynes@
ams.usda.gov.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
Section
10108 of the Agriculture Improvement
Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–334) (2018
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Jul 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
Farm Bill) amended the Plant Variety
Protection Act of 1970, as amended (7
U.S.C. 2321–2582) (Act), by adding a
definition for the term ‘‘asexually
reproduced’’ as it pertains to plant
propagation and adding authority to
offer intellectual property protection to
breeders of new varieties of plants
developed through asexual
reproduction. This rule proposes
corresponding changes to the plant
variety protection regulations
established under the Act. The Plant
Variety Protection regulations at 7 CFR
part 97 (regulations) are administered by
the Plant Variety Protection Office
(PVPO), under the Agricultural
Marketing Service’s (AMS) Science and
Technology Program.
Background Information
The Act authorizes the PVPO to
provide intellectual property protection
to breeders of new plant varieties to
facilitate the marketing of those new
varieties. Currently, breeders can apply
for and receive certificates that protect
new varieties of seed and tuber
propagated plants for 20 years, or 25
years for seed propagated vines and
trees. A Certificate of Protection is
awarded to an owner of a variety after
examination by PVPO indicates that it is
new, distinct from other varieties,
genetically uniform, and stable through
successive generations. PVPO-issued
certificates are recognized worldwide
and facilitate filing for plant variety
protection in other countries. Certificate
owners have the right to exclude others
from marketing and selling protected
varieties, manage the use of their
varieties by other breeders, and enjoy
legal protection of their work.
Asexually reproduced varieties are
those derived using vegetative material,
other than seed, from a single parent
including cuttings, grafting, tissue
culture, and propagation by root
division. These varieties are a
significant and growing portion of the
industry. Developers of asexually
reproduced varieties desire intellectual
property rights recognized
internationally that can only be
obtained through PVPO-issued
certificates.
Proposed Provisions
AMS proposes to revise the Plant
Variety Protection regulations by adding
references to asexual plant reproduction
as appropriate to the current regulations
that apply to the protection of seed and
tubers. This proposed rule would revise
§ 97.1 to extend the protection breeders
can obtain from PVPO to plants
propagated through asexual means. As
with other plants covered by the Act,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
plant breeders would receive certificates
that would protect asexually reproduced
plant varieties for 20 years, or 25 years
for trees and vines. Proposed revisions
to the definition of the term sale for
other than seed purposes in § 97.2
would add ‘‘propagating material’’ to
that term as used in the regulations.
Proposed revisions to § 97.6 would
require that with an application for
plant variety protection of an asexually
propagated variety, a deposit of
propagating material must be made to a
public depository approved by the
Commissioner and maintained for the
duration of the certificate.
A proposed revision to § 97.7(d)
would specify that original deposits of
materials for tuber- or asexually
reproduced plants must be made within
three months of the notice of certificate
issuance. Tuber-reproduced plants are
currently eligible for plant variety
protection under the Act and
regulations. Addition of the reference to
tuber-reproduced plants in § 97.7(d) is
proposed at this time to correct
inadvertent omission of that reference in
previous revisions to the regulations.
Revised § 97.7(d) would also address
situations—as suggested by stakeholder
feedback—in which it is technically
infeasible to deposit or store
propagating materials for certain
asexually reproduced plants. In such
situations, applicants would be allowed
to request delay waivers, and would
need to agree to provide a specimen,
when one is needed, within three
months of PVPO’s request. PVPO would
consider a certificate abandoned if the
applicant failed to provide the requested
specimen within the three-month
timeframe.
A proposed revision to § 97.19(c)
would replace the reference to ‘‘name of
the kind of seed,’’ which appears on
PVPO posts about pending applications,
with the more generic reference to
‘‘name of the crop,’’ to accommodate all
types of plant material that could be
protected, including asexual
reproduction material. The proposed
rule would replace references to seed
deposits in § 97.104 with references to
seed and propagating material deposits
made in the application and
certification processes. Currently,
§ 97.141 of the regulations allows
owners of plant varieties for which
certificates have been issued to prohibit
unauthorized multiplication of the seed
of those varieties. Proposed revisions to
§ 97.141 would extend that protection to
prohibit the unauthorized
multiplication of propagating material
of those varieties. Similarly, proposed
revisions to § 97.142 would allow
owners of protected plant varieties to
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules
prohibit unauthorized increases of all
propagating material released for testing
or increase. Currently, § 97.142 only
specifies such prohibition for seed and
reproducible plant material released for
testing or increase.
The proposed rule would also
modernize the regulations to reflect
current industry and government
practices. The current regulations were
most recently revised in 2005 and
contain obsolete or incomplete
references to processes that have
changed over the years. For instance,
when color is a distinguishing
characteristic of a plant variety, the
color can be described according to any
recognized color charts used in the
industry for that purpose. Section 97.9
currently provides one example of a
named color chart—the Nickerson Color
Fan, which has long been in use. The
proposed rule would expand the list of
examples in § 97.9 to identify two
additional color charts that could be
referenced, the Munsell Book of Color
and the Royal Horticultural Society
Colour Chart, as well as any other
commonly recognized color charts.
Many of the proposed changes pertain
to PVPO’s application process,
including the timing of different steps in
the process. PVPO expects the proposed
changes to simplify the requirements for
applicants and to expedite the issuance
of variety protection certificates, which
would be a benefit to their customers.
Currently, applicants pay fees
associated with certain steps of the
application process as they go through
the process, but a proposed revision to
§ 97.6(c) would require the portions of
the application fee for filing an
application, for application examination
by PVPO, and for certificate issuance to
all be paid at the time of application.
Corresponding revisions are proposed to
§§ 97.103(a) and 97.104(a) and (c). A
proposed revision to § 97.20(a) would
specify that, subject to certain
exceptions, filing and examination fees
would not be refundable after an
application is deemed by PVPO to be
abandoned. A proposed revision to
§ 97.23(c) would require payment of
new filing and examination fees for
reconsideration of an original
application that had been withdrawn by
the applicant. Currently, § 97.101—
Notice of Allowance specifies that an
applicant must pay the certificate fee
within one month of the notice of
allowance. The proposed rule would
revise § 97.101 by requiring the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Jul 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
applicant to verify the names of the
plant variety and the owner and would
give the applicant an opportunity to
withdraw the application before the
certificate is issued. After 30 days, a fee
for delayed response would be charged
to the applicant. Proposed revisions to
§ 97.178 would remove references to
searches and search fees and would
specify that the examination fee could
be refunded if an application is either
voluntarily withdrawn or abandoned
before the examination has begun.
Section 97.178 would be further revised
to provide that the certificate issuance
fee would be refunded if an application
is voluntarily withdrawn or abandoned
after an examination, but before a
certificate is issued.
This proposed rule would reorganize
and simplify the schedule of fees and
charges for PVPO services in § 97.175.
The proposed revisions would
consolidate and simplify the fee
schedule to reflect the proposed
revisions described above. Fee amounts
for filing an application, examination,
certificate issuance, application
reconsideration, revival of abandoned
applications, and filing appeals with the
Commissioner or the Secretary would
not change from the current fee
schedule. However, fees for PVPO
services like reproducing records,
authentication, and correction or
reissuance of a certificate would no
longer be specified separately in the fee
schedule in the regulations and would
be charged at rates prescribed by the
Commissioner, not to exceed $97 per
employee hour. Currently those services
are estimated to average $107 per
employee hour. Office automation and
other process improvements make the
proposed decreases feasible. One such
improvement is the ability to process fee
payments through electronic payment
methods. The proposed revision to
§ 97.177 would specify that payments
could be made through the Plant Variety
Protection system or through pay.gov,
although payments by check or money
order would still be allowed.
The proposed rule would replace
obsolete references in the regulations to
the Official Journal of the Plant Variety
Protection Office with references to the
PVPO website, which is the current
business portal used by PVPO to
provide service to its customers.
Another revision would add a reference
to the PVPO website to the section.
Such changes are proposed for
§§ 97.5(c), 97.7(c)(5), 97.14(d), 97.19,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33177
97.403(d), and 97.800. Such changes
would also be made to what are
currently paragraphs (b) and (d) of
§ 97.104, but which would be
redesignated paragraphs (a) and (c)
through other revisions to the section. A
further proposed revision to § 97.5(c)
would provide that applicants could
request forms and information at a
PVPO email address. A proposed
revision for § 97.12 would clarify that
PVPO could use mail or email to notify
applicants of the filing number and
effective filing date of applications
received by PVPO. Section 97.23(c)
would be revised to specify that refiling
a voluntarily withdrawn original
application must be accompanied by
payment of a new filing and
examination fee, while § 97.23(d) would
be removed altogether, as it contains
obsolete references to applications
pending on April 4, 1995. An additional
revision to § 97.104 (a) would remove
reference to the return of seed samples
deposited with applications since that is
no longer the practice of PVPO and
would provide that samples of seed and
propagating material associated with
abandoned applications and certificates
would be retained or destroyed by the
depository. Finally, the proposed rule
would correct the reference in § 97.500
to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, to whom applicants
may appeal if they are dissatisfied with
decisions of the Secretary related to
plant variety protection issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small business entities. The
affected industry falls under the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) as code 54171—
Research and development in the
physical, engineering, and life sciences.
This classification includes firms that
are not plant breeders/plant research;
however no detailed industry data was
available for the analysis.
Table 1 shows the most recent
descriptive data for the industry,
obtained from the County Business
Pattern 2016 survey. This data set
provides information on the number of
establishments, number of employees
and total annual payroll.
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
33178
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—NUMBER OF ESTABLISHMENTS, REVENUE AND PAYROLL BY EMPLOYEE COUNT, NAICS CODE 54171, 2016
COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS 1
All establishments ......................................................................................................
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) determines firm size for this
industry by number of employees, but
on a per firm basis, with small firms
defined as having fewer than 1,000
employees and 1,000 or more employees
per firm classified as large. Because
firms may own more than one
Number of
establishments
Number of
paid employees
Annual payroll
($1,000)
17,292
695,810
$82,865,611
establishment, and the County Business
Patterns data are compiled on an
establishment rather than a firm basis,
we must use the Economic Census data
to determine the number of small and
large firms for the industry.
Table 2 shows the most recent data
available on the breakdown between
small (<1,000 employees) and large
(1,000 or more employees) firms in this
industry, according to the SBA’s
guidance.2 The data are from the 2002
Economic Census, with monetary values
converted to 2016 dollars. More recent
Economic Census data is not available at
this level of detail for this industry.
TABLE 2—NUMBER OF FIRMS AND ESTABLISHMENTS, REVENUE AND PAYROLL BY EMPLOYEE COUNT, NAICS CODE
54171, 2002 ECONOMIC CENSUS 3
Number of
firms
Size of firm by number of employees
Number of
establishments
Number
of paid
employees
Revenue *
($1,000)
Annual
payroll *
($1,000)
Small—Firms with less than 1,000 employees .............
Large—Firms with 1,000 employees or more ...............
10,200
79
11,753
1,380
273,601
283,816
$49,702,793
30,095,258
$24,780,487
27,776,903
All firms ..........................................................................
10,279
13,133
557,417
79,798,051
52,557,389
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
* Adjusted to 2016 values.
The 2002 Economic Census reported
that fewer than one percent of firms
were considered large (79 of 10,279
firms, or 0.54 percent). The 10,279 firms
at that time owned a total of 13,133
establishments, with 1,380 (nearly 11
percent) of these facilities owned by the
79 large firms.
The tables show the extent of growth
in the industry over time. The number
of establishments has grown from
13,133 in 2002 to 17,292 in 2016 (32
percent, or 2.3 percent per year). Total
employment increased from 557,417
workers to 695,810 (25 percent, or 1.8
percent per year), and total annual
payroll from $52,557,389 to $82,865,611
(58 percent, or 4 percent per year).
These figures indicate that the industry
has seen small to moderate growth, with
a more highly paid work force over
time. There do not appear significant
changes in the structure of the industry
between 2002 and 2016.
In reviewing PVPO’s list of customers,
AMS found evidence that the size
distribution of the firms affected by this
rule was consistent with data reported
in the 2002 Economic Census. AMS
estimates that most PVPO customers
would be considered small business
entities under the criteria established by
SBA (13 CFR 121.201), while fewer than
5% of the plant breeders and plant
research and development firms using
PVPO services would be considered
large businesses with 1,000 or more
employees.
The PVP Office administers the PVP
Act of 1970, as amended (7 U.S.C. 2321
et seq.), and issues Certificates of
Protection that provide intellectual
property rights to developers of new
varieties of plants. A Certificate of
Protection is awarded to an owner of a
variety after examination indicates that
it is new, distinct from other varieties,
genetically uniform, and stable through
successive generations. PVP is a
voluntary service.
This proposed rule would amend the
regulations to add application and
certification procedures for asexually
reproduced plants that mirror
procedures currently in use for sexually
reproduced and tuber propagated
varieties. The proposed rule is intended
to give breeders of new plant varieties
additional tools for protecting new and
emerging crops that were not previously
available. This benefit would accrue to
breeders of all sizes. As well, the
proposed rule would simplify the fee
schedule for services provided by the
PVPO and would reduce fees for some
services from $107.00 per hour to
$97.00 per hour. The new fee schedule
and rates would streamline the
certification process and reduce the cost
of maintaining a PVP Certificate of
Protection and would apply to
applicants of all sizes. Finally, proposed
modernization of business processes
under the regulations is intended to
improve service delivery to PVPO
customers of all sizes.
There are currently more than 800
users of the plant variety protection
service, of whom about 95 file
applications in a given year. Some of
these users are small business entities
under the criteria established by SBA
(13 CFR 121.201). With this action, the
number of users is expected to increase
by roughly 40 firms. The new applicants
are expected to submit an additional 50
new applications on a yearly basis.
PVP applicants are subject to an
application fee of $5,150 per certificate.
This proposed rule would allow firms
that withdraw their applications to be
reimbursed $768. Additional services
are available from the PVPO at the
1 Geography Area Series: County Business
Patterns by Employment Size Class, 2016 Business
Patterns, https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/
tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=BP_
2016_00A3&prodType=table.
2 ‘‘Table of Small Business Size Standards
Matched to North American Industry Classification
System Codes’’, Small Business Administration,
effective January 1, 2017, https://www.sba.gov/sites/
default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf.
3 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services:
Subject Series—Establishment and Firm Size:
Employment Size of Firms for the United States:
2002 Economic Census of the United States, https://
factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/
productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2002_US_
54SSSZ5&prodType=table.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Jul 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules
request of the applicant. Applicants
using these services are subject to fees
as listed in the rule schedule (7 CFR
97.175), with the inclusion of the
reduction in fees for specified services.
It is expected that new applicants will
also participate in the Germ Plasm
Deposit, at a cost of $3,000 per
applicant.
The burden on the new entrants is
calculated by multiplying the cost of
application, $5,150, by the number of
expected new applicants (50), for an
additional cost of $5,150 * 50 =
$257,500. The cost to new applicants for
the Germ Plasm Deposit is $3,000 * 50
= $150,000. In total this represents an
additional cost to industry for this
proposed rule of $407,500. The estimate
is an upper boundary made without
including the cost savings that result
from the reduced hourly fee for
additional services or the
reimbursement for withdrawn
applications, as these cost reductions
are expected to be needed infrequently.
Due to the limited cost of the
proposed rule expanding a voluntary
program, AMS has determined that this
action would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of these small business entities.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the information collection
requirements for this program will be
submitted as a new collection to OMB
for approval and will be reported in the
final rule.
This proposed rule would revise the
list of plant varieties eligible for PVPO
certification and protection to include
asexually reproduced plants. This
proposed rule would also simplify the
fee schedule for applicants and would
lower the fees for some services. Finally,
this rule would modernize the PVPO
regulations to reflect current industry
and government business operations.
Reports and forms used in PVPO
operations are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
E-Gov
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies, to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771
This proposed rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Jul 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
action contained in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and is not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Additionally, because this proposed
rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not
trigger the requirements contained in
Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 13175—
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments. Executive
Order 13175 requires Federal agencies
to consult and coordinate with tribes on
a government-to-government basis on:
(1) Policies that have tribal implication,
including regulation, legislative
comments, or proposed legislation; and
(2) other policy statements or actions
that have substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
AMS has assessed the impact of this
proposed rule on Indian tribes and
determined that this rule would not
have tribal implications that require
consultation under Executive Order
13175. AMS hosts a quarterly
teleconference with tribal leaders where
matters of mutual interest regarding the
marketing of agricultural products are
discussed. Information about the
proposed changes to the regulations will
be shared during an upcoming quarterly
call, and tribal leaders will be informed
about the proposed revisions to the
regulation and the opportunity to
submit comments. AMS will work with
the USDA Office of Tribal Relations to
ensure meaningful consultation is
provided as needed with regards to the
PVPO regulations.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform. This proposed action is not
intended to have retroactive effect, nor
would it preempt any state or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless
they present an irreconcilable conflict
with the proposed rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 63 of the Act, when an
application for plant variety protection
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33179
has been refused by the PVPO, the
applicant may appeal to the Secretary.
The Secretary must seek the advice of
the Plant Variety Protection Board on all
appeals before deciding an appeal. The
Act provides that an applicant can
appeal the Secretary’s decision in the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, or institute a civil action in the
U.S. District Court, provided that such
action is taken within 60 days of the
Secretary’s decision, or such further
time as the Secretary allows.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 97
Plants, Seeds.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, USDA proposes to amend 7
CFR part 97 as follows:
PART 97—PLANT VARIETY AND
PROTECTION
1. The authority citation for part 97
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Plant Variety Protection Act, as
amended, 7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.
■
2. Revise § 97.1 to read as follows:
§ 97.1
General.
Certificates of protection are issued by
the Plant Variety Protection office for
new, distinct, uniform, and stable
varieties of sexually reproduced, tuber
propagated, or asexually reproduced
plants. Each certificate of plant variety
protection certifies that the breeder has
the right, during the term of the
protection, to prevent others from
selling the variety, offering it for sale,
reproducing it, importing or exporting
it, conditioning it, stocking it, or using
it in producing a hybrid or different
variety from it, as provided by the Act.
■ 3. Amend § 97.2 by removing the
definition for Official Journal and
revising the definition for Sale for other
than seed purposes to read as follows:
§ 97.2
Meaning of words.
*
*
*
*
*
Sale for other than seed or
propagating purposes. The transfer of
title to and possession of the seed or
propagating material by the owner to a
grower or other person, for reproduction
for the owner, for testing, or for
experimental use, and not for
commercial sale of the seed, reproduced
seed, propagating material, or
reproduced propagating material for
planting purposes.
■ 4. Amend § 97.5 by revising paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
§ 97.5
General requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Application and exhibit forms
shall be issued by the Commissioner.
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
33180
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(Copies of the forms may be obtained
from the Plant Variety Protection Office
by sending an email request to
PVPOmail@ams.usda.gov or
downloading forms from the PVPO
website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/
PVPO).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 97.6 by revising
paragraphs (c) and (d)(3) and adding
paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows:
§ 97.6
Application for certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The fees for filing an application,
examination, and certificate issuance
shall be submitted with the application
in accordance with §§ 97.175 through
97.178.
(d) * * *
(3) With the application for a hybrid
from self-incompatible parents, a
declaration that a plot of vegetative
material for each parent will be
established in a public depository
approved by the Commissioner and will
be maintained for the duration of the
certificate, or
(4) With the application for an
asexually propagated variety, a
declaration that a deposit of propagating
material in a public depository
approved by the Commissioner will be
made and maintained for the duration of
the certificate.
■ 6. Amend § 97.7 by revising
paragraphs (c)(5) and (d) to read as
follows:
§ 97.7
Deposit of Voucher Specimen.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) Once a depository is recognized to
be suitable by the Commissioner or has
defaulted or discontinued its
performance under this section, notice
thereof will be published on the Plant
Variety Protection Office website
(https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO).
(d) Time of making an original
deposit. An original deposit of materials
for seed-reproduced plants shall be
made within three months of the filing
date of the application or prior to
issuance of the certificate, whichever
occurs first. An original deposit of
materials for tuber-propagated plants or
asexually reproduced plants shall be
made within three months from the
notice of certificate issuance date. A
waiver from these time requirements
may be granted for good cause, such as
delays in obtaining a phytosanitary
certificate for the importation of
voucher sample materials. A delay
waiver may also be granted to address
the technical infeasibility of depositing
propagating materials for certain
asexually reproduced plants.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Jul 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
(1) When the original deposit is made,
the applicant must promptly submit a
statement from a person in a position to
corroborate the fact, stating that the
voucher specimen material which is
deposited is the variety specifically
identified in the application as filed.
Such statement must be filed in the
application and must contain the
identifying information listed in
paragraph (b) of this section and:
(i) The name and address of the
depository;
(ii) The date of deposit;
(iii) The accession number given by
the depository; and
(iv) A statement that the deposit is
capable of reproduction.
(2) When a delay waiver is granted
due to technical difficulties with
depositing propagating materials for
asexually reproduced plants, the
applicant is required to make a
declaration that a voucher specimen
will be provided within three months of
a request by the Plant Variety Protection
Office. Failure to provide a specimen as
requested shall result in the certificate
being regarded as abandoned.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 97.9 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 97.9
Drawings and photographs.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Drawings or photographs shall be
in color when color is a distinguishing
characteristic of the variety, and the
color shall be described by use of
Nickerson’s color fan, the Munsell Book
of Color, the Royal Horticultural Society
Colour Chart, or other recognized color
chart.
(c) Drawings shall be sent flat, or may
be sent in a suitable mailing tube, in
accordance with instructions furnished
by the Commissioner.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 97.12 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 97.12 Number and filing date of an
application.
(a) Applications shall be numbered
and dated in sequence in the order
received by the Office. Applicants will
be informed in writing, by mail or
email, as soon as practicable of the
number and effective filing date of the
application.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 97.14 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 97.14
*
*
*
*
(d) If a joint owner refuses to join in
an application or cannot be found after
diligent effort, the remaining owner may
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 97.19 Publication of pending
applications.
Information relating to pending
applications shall be published
periodically as determined by the
Commissioner to be necessary in the
public interest. With respect to each
application, the Plant Variety Protection
Office website (https://
www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO) shall show:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The name of the crop; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Amend § 97. 20 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 97.20 Abandonment for failure to
respond within the time limit.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in
§ 97.104, if an applicant fails to advance
actively his or her application within 30
days after the date when the last request
for action was mailed to the applicant
by the Office, or within such longer time
as may be fixed by the Commissioner,
the application shall be deemed
abandoned. The filing and examination
fees in such cases will not be refunded.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Amend § 97.23 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows, and by
removing paragraph (d).
§ 97.23 Voluntary withdrawal and
abandonment of an application.
*
Joint applicants.
*
file an application on behalf of him or
herself and the missing owner. Such
application shall be accompanied by a
written explanation and shall state the
last known address of the missing
owner. Notice of the filing of the
application shall be forwarded by the
Office to the missing owner at the last
known address. If such notice is
returned to the Office undelivered, or if
the address of the missing owner is
unknown, notice of the filing of the
application shall be published once on
the Plant Variety Protection Office
website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/
PVPO). Prior to the issuance of the
certificate, a missing owner may join in
an application by filing a written
explanation. A certificate obtained by
fewer than all of the joint owners under
this paragraph conveys the same rights
and privileges to said owners as though
all of the original owners had joined in
an application.
■ 10. Amend § 97.19 by revising the
introductory text and paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) An original application which has
been voluntarily withdrawn shall be
returned to the applicant and may be
reconsidered only by refiling and
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules
payment of new filing and examination
fees.
■ 13. Revise § 97. 101 to read as follows:
§ 97.101
Notice of allowance.
If, on examination, PVPO determines
that the applicant is entitled to a
certificate, a notice of allowance shall be
sent to the applicant or his or her
attorney or agent of record, if any,
requesting verification of the variety
name and of the name of the owner. The
notice will also provide an opportunity
for withdrawal of the application before
certificate issuance. The applicant must
respond within 30 days from the date of
the notice of allowance. Thereafter, a fee
for delayed response shall be charged as
specified in § 97.175(f).
■ 14. Amend § 97.103 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 97.103
Issuance of a certificate.
(a) After the notice of allowance has
been issued and the applicant has
clearly specified whether or not the
variety shall be sold by variety name
only as a class of certified seed, the
certificate shall be promptly issued.
Once an election is made and a
certificate issued specifying that seed of
the variety shall be sold by variety name
only as a class of certified seed, no
waiver of such rights shall be permitted
by amendment of the certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Amend § 97.104 by removing
paragraph (a), redesignating paragraphs
(b) through (d) as paragraphs (a) through
(c), and revising redesignated
paragraphs (a) through (c) to read as
follows:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 97.104 Application or certificate
abandoned.
16:41 Jul 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
§ 97.141
After issuance.
Upon issuance of a certificate, the
owner of the variety, or his or her
designee, may label the variety,
propagating material of the variety, or
containers of the seed of the variety or
plants produced from such seed or
propagating material substantially as
follows: ‘‘Unauthorized Propagation
Prohibited—(Unauthorized Seed or
Propagating Material Multiplication
Prohibited)—U.S. Protected Variety.’’
Where applicable, ‘‘PVPA 1994’’ or
‘‘PVPA 1994—Unauthorized Sales for
Reproductive Purposes Prohibited’’ may
be added to the notice.
■ 17. Revise § 97.142 to read as follows:
§ 97.142
(a) Upon request by the Office, the
owner shall replenish the seed or
propagating material of the variety and
shall pay the handling fee for
replenishment. Samples of seed or
propagating material related to
abandoned applications or certificates
will be retained or destroyed by the
depository. Failure to replenish seed or
propagating material within 3 months
from the date of request shall result in
the certificate being regarded as
abandoned. No sooner than 1 year after
the date of such request, notices of
abandoned certificates shall be
published on the Plant Variety
Protection Office website (https://
www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO), indicating
that the variety has become open for use
by the public and, if previously
specified to be sold by variety name as
‘‘certified seed only,’’ that such
restriction no longer applies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(b) If the seed or propagating material
is submitted within 9 months of the
final due date, it may be accepted by the
Commissioner as though no
abandonment had occurred. For good
cause, the Commissioner may extend for
a reasonable time the period for
submitting seed or propagating material
before declaring the certificate
abandoned.
(c) A certificate may be voluntarily
abandoned by the applicant or his or her
attorney or agent of record or the
assignee of record by notifying the
Commissioner in writing. Upon receipt
of such notice, the Commissioner shall
publish a notice on the Plant Variety
Protection Office website (https://
www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO) that the
variety has become open for use by the
public, and if previously specified to be
sold by variety name as ‘‘certified seed
only,’’ that such restriction no longer
applies.
■ 16. Revise § 97.141 to read as follows:
For testing or increase.
An owner who contemplates filing an
application and releases for testing or
increase seed of the variety or
propagating material or reproducible
plant material of the variety may label
such plant material or containers of the
seed or plant material substantially as
follows: ‘‘Unauthorized Propagation
Prohibited—For Testing (or Increase)
Only.’’
■ 18. Revise § 97.175 to read as follows:
§ 97.175
Fees and charges.
The following fees and charges apply
to the services and actions specified
below:
(a) Application
(1) Initial fee for filing, examination,
and certificate issuance—$5,150
(2) Submission of new application
data prior to issuance of certificate—
$432
(3) Granting extensions for responding
to data requests—$89
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33181
(4) Refunds pursuant to § 97.178 may
be issued for portions of the initial
application fee as follows:
Examination—$3,864, and certificate
issuance—$768.
(b) Reconsideration of application—
$589
(c) Revival of an abandoned
application—$518
(d) Appeals
(1) Filing a petition for protest to
Commissioner—$4,118
(2) Appeal to Secretary (refundable if
appeal overturns protest to
Commissioner)—$4,942
(e) Field inspections or other services
requiring travel by a representative of
the Plant Variety Protection Office,
made at the request of the applicant,
shall be reimbursable in full (including
travel, per diem or subsistence, salary,
and administrative costs), in accordance
with standardized government travel
regulations.
(f) Any other service not covered in
this section, including, but not limited
to, reproduction of records,
authentication, correction, or reissuance
of a certificate, recordation or revision
of assignment, and late fees will be
charged for at rates prescribed by the
Commissioner, but in no event shall
they exceed $97 per employee hour.
Charges will also be made for materials,
space, and administrative costs.
■ 19. Revise § 97. 177 to read as follows:
§ 97.177
Method of payment.
Payments can be submitted through
the electronic Plant Variety Protection
system or pay.gov. Checks or money
orders shall be made payable to the
Treasurer of the United States.
Remittances from foreign countries must
be payable and immediately negotiable
in the United States for the full amount
of the prescribed fee. Money sent by
mail to the Office shall be sent at the
sender’s risk.
■ 20. Revise § 97.178 to read as follows:
§ 97.178
Refunds.
Money paid by mistake or excess
payments shall be refunded, but a mere
change of plans after the payment of
money, as when a party decides to
withdraw an application or to withdraw
an appeal, shall not entitle a party to a
refund. However, the examination fee
shall be refunded if an application is
voluntarily withdrawn or abandoned
pursuant to § 97.23(a) before the
examination has begun. The certificate
issuance fee shall be refunded if an
application is voluntarily withdrawn or
abandoned after an examination has
been completed and before a certificate
has been issued. Amounts of $1 or less
shall not be refunded unless specifically
demanded.
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
33182
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules
21. Amend § 97.403 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 97.403
Manner of service.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Whenever it shall be found by the
Commissioner or Secretary that none of
the above modes of serving the paper is
practicable, service may be by notice,
published once on the Plant Variety
Protection Office website (https://
www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO).
■ 22. Revise § 97.500 to read as follows:
§ 97.500
Appeal to U.S. Courts.
Any applicant dissatisfied with the
decision of the Secretary on appeal may
appeal to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit, or institute a civil
action in the U.S. District Court as set
forth in the Act. In such cases, the
appellant or plaintiff shall give notice to
the Secretary, state the reasons for
appeal or civil action, and obtain a
certified copy of the record. The
certified copy of the record shall be
forwarded to the Court by the Plant
Variety Protection Office on order of,
and at the expense of the appellant or
plaintiff.
■ 23. Revise § 97.800 to read as follows:
§ 97.800 Publication of public variety
descriptions.
Voluntary submissions of varietal
descriptions of ‘‘public varieties’’ on
forms obtainable from the Office will be
accepted for publication on the Plant
Variety Protection Office website
(https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO).
Such publication shall not constitute
recognition that the variety is, in fact,
distinct, uniform, and stable.
Dated: July 8, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–14799 Filed 7–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–18–0099; SC18–981–1
PR]
Almonds Grown in California;
Revisions to the Accepted User
Program Requirements and New
Information Collection
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement a recommendation from the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Jul 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
Almond Board of California (Board) to
revise the almond accepted user
program requirements currently
prescribed under the Marketing Order
for Almonds Grown in California
(Order). In addition, this action would
prohibit the transfer of inedible material
between accepted users. This proposal
also announces the Agricultural
Marketing Service’s (AMS) intention to
request approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) of a
new information collection and to make
a conforming change to an existing
form.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 12, 2019. Comments on the
forms and information collection must
be received by September 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist, or
Terry Vawter, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Peter.Sommers@usda.gov or
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California. Part 981 (referred to
as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Board locally administers the Order and
is comprised of growers and handlers
operating within California.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that OMB exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this proposed rule does not
meet the definition of a significant
regulatory action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule invites comments
on revisions to the almond accepted
user program requirements currently
prescribed under the Order. This
proposal would require accepted users
to dispose of inedible material within
six months of receipt, submit public
weighmaster weight certificates within
10 business days of receipt of inedible
material, and submit an accepted user
plan annually. In addition, this action
would prohibit the transfer of inedible
material between accepted users,
establish a new information collection,
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33176-33182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14799]
[[Page 33176]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 97
[Document Number AMS-ST-19-0004]
RIN 0581-AD86
Regulations and Procedures Under the Plant Variety Protection Act
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Comments are invited on proposed revisions to the regulations,
fees for services, and procedures established under the Plant Variety
Protection Act. The proposed revisions are needed to conform with
recent amendments to the Plant Variety Protection Act, which added
authority for the Plant Variety Protection Office to issue certificates
of protection for varieties of plants that are reproduced asexually.
The proposed rule would add references to the term ``asexual
reproduction'' to the regulations established under the Act. The
proposed rule would also modernize the regulations by simplifying the
fee schedule for PVPO services and updating the regulations relating to
administrative procedures to reflect current business practices.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by September 10,
2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. All comments must be submitted through
the Federal e-rulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov and
should reference the document number and the date and page number of
this issue of the Federal Register. All comments submitted in response
to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made
available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffery Haynes, Deputy Commissioner,
Plant Variety Protection Office, AMS Science and Technology Program,
USDA; 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 4512-S, Stop 0274, Washington,
DC 20250-0002; telephone: (202) 260-8983; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 10108 of the Agriculture Improvement
Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-334) (2018 Farm Bill) amended the Plant
Variety Protection Act of 1970, as amended (7 U.S.C. 2321-2582) (Act),
by adding a definition for the term ``asexually reproduced'' as it
pertains to plant propagation and adding authority to offer
intellectual property protection to breeders of new varieties of plants
developed through asexual reproduction. This rule proposes
corresponding changes to the plant variety protection regulations
established under the Act. The Plant Variety Protection regulations at
7 CFR part 97 (regulations) are administered by the Plant Variety
Protection Office (PVPO), under the Agricultural Marketing Service's
(AMS) Science and Technology Program.
Background Information
The Act authorizes the PVPO to provide intellectual property
protection to breeders of new plant varieties to facilitate the
marketing of those new varieties. Currently, breeders can apply for and
receive certificates that protect new varieties of seed and tuber
propagated plants for 20 years, or 25 years for seed propagated vines
and trees. A Certificate of Protection is awarded to an owner of a
variety after examination by PVPO indicates that it is new, distinct
from other varieties, genetically uniform, and stable through
successive generations. PVPO-issued certificates are recognized
worldwide and facilitate filing for plant variety protection in other
countries. Certificate owners have the right to exclude others from
marketing and selling protected varieties, manage the use of their
varieties by other breeders, and enjoy legal protection of their work.
Asexually reproduced varieties are those derived using vegetative
material, other than seed, from a single parent including cuttings,
grafting, tissue culture, and propagation by root division. These
varieties are a significant and growing portion of the industry.
Developers of asexually reproduced varieties desire intellectual
property rights recognized internationally that can only be obtained
through PVPO-issued certificates.
Proposed Provisions
AMS proposes to revise the Plant Variety Protection regulations by
adding references to asexual plant reproduction as appropriate to the
current regulations that apply to the protection of seed and tubers.
This proposed rule would revise Sec. 97.1 to extend the protection
breeders can obtain from PVPO to plants propagated through asexual
means. As with other plants covered by the Act, plant breeders would
receive certificates that would protect asexually reproduced plant
varieties for 20 years, or 25 years for trees and vines. Proposed
revisions to the definition of the term sale for other than seed
purposes in Sec. 97.2 would add ``propagating material'' to that term
as used in the regulations. Proposed revisions to Sec. 97.6 would
require that with an application for plant variety protection of an
asexually propagated variety, a deposit of propagating material must be
made to a public depository approved by the Commissioner and maintained
for the duration of the certificate.
A proposed revision to Sec. 97.7(d) would specify that original
deposits of materials for tuber- or asexually reproduced plants must be
made within three months of the notice of certificate issuance. Tuber-
reproduced plants are currently eligible for plant variety protection
under the Act and regulations. Addition of the reference to tuber-
reproduced plants in Sec. 97.7(d) is proposed at this time to correct
inadvertent omission of that reference in previous revisions to the
regulations. Revised Sec. 97.7(d) would also address situations--as
suggested by stakeholder feedback--in which it is technically
infeasible to deposit or store propagating materials for certain
asexually reproduced plants. In such situations, applicants would be
allowed to request delay waivers, and would need to agree to provide a
specimen, when one is needed, within three months of PVPO's request.
PVPO would consider a certificate abandoned if the applicant failed to
provide the requested specimen within the three-month timeframe.
A proposed revision to Sec. 97.19(c) would replace the reference
to ``name of the kind of seed,'' which appears on PVPO posts about
pending applications, with the more generic reference to ``name of the
crop,'' to accommodate all types of plant material that could be
protected, including asexual reproduction material. The proposed rule
would replace references to seed deposits in Sec. 97.104 with
references to seed and propagating material deposits made in the
application and certification processes. Currently, Sec. 97.141 of the
regulations allows owners of plant varieties for which certificates
have been issued to prohibit unauthorized multiplication of the seed of
those varieties. Proposed revisions to Sec. 97.141 would extend that
protection to prohibit the unauthorized multiplication of propagating
material of those varieties. Similarly, proposed revisions to Sec.
97.142 would allow owners of protected plant varieties to
[[Page 33177]]
prohibit unauthorized increases of all propagating material released
for testing or increase. Currently, Sec. 97.142 only specifies such
prohibition for seed and reproducible plant material released for
testing or increase.
The proposed rule would also modernize the regulations to reflect
current industry and government practices. The current regulations were
most recently revised in 2005 and contain obsolete or incomplete
references to processes that have changed over the years. For instance,
when color is a distinguishing characteristic of a plant variety, the
color can be described according to any recognized color charts used in
the industry for that purpose. Section 97.9 currently provides one
example of a named color chart--the Nickerson Color Fan, which has long
been in use. The proposed rule would expand the list of examples in
Sec. 97.9 to identify two additional color charts that could be
referenced, the Munsell Book of Color and the Royal Horticultural
Society Colour Chart, as well as any other commonly recognized color
charts.
Many of the proposed changes pertain to PVPO's application process,
including the timing of different steps in the process. PVPO expects
the proposed changes to simplify the requirements for applicants and to
expedite the issuance of variety protection certificates, which would
be a benefit to their customers. Currently, applicants pay fees
associated with certain steps of the application process as they go
through the process, but a proposed revision to Sec. 97.6(c) would
require the portions of the application fee for filing an application,
for application examination by PVPO, and for certificate issuance to
all be paid at the time of application. Corresponding revisions are
proposed to Sec. Sec. 97.103(a) and 97.104(a) and (c). A proposed
revision to Sec. 97.20(a) would specify that, subject to certain
exceptions, filing and examination fees would not be refundable after
an application is deemed by PVPO to be abandoned. A proposed revision
to Sec. 97.23(c) would require payment of new filing and examination
fees for reconsideration of an original application that had been
withdrawn by the applicant. Currently, Sec. 97.101--Notice of
Allowance specifies that an applicant must pay the certificate fee
within one month of the notice of allowance. The proposed rule would
revise Sec. 97.101 by requiring the applicant to verify the names of
the plant variety and the owner and would give the applicant an
opportunity to withdraw the application before the certificate is
issued. After 30 days, a fee for delayed response would be charged to
the applicant. Proposed revisions to Sec. 97.178 would remove
references to searches and search fees and would specify that the
examination fee could be refunded if an application is either
voluntarily withdrawn or abandoned before the examination has begun.
Section 97.178 would be further revised to provide that the certificate
issuance fee would be refunded if an application is voluntarily
withdrawn or abandoned after an examination, but before a certificate
is issued.
This proposed rule would reorganize and simplify the schedule of
fees and charges for PVPO services in Sec. 97.175. The proposed
revisions would consolidate and simplify the fee schedule to reflect
the proposed revisions described above. Fee amounts for filing an
application, examination, certificate issuance, application
reconsideration, revival of abandoned applications, and filing appeals
with the Commissioner or the Secretary would not change from the
current fee schedule. However, fees for PVPO services like reproducing
records, authentication, and correction or reissuance of a certificate
would no longer be specified separately in the fee schedule in the
regulations and would be charged at rates prescribed by the
Commissioner, not to exceed $97 per employee hour. Currently those
services are estimated to average $107 per employee hour. Office
automation and other process improvements make the proposed decreases
feasible. One such improvement is the ability to process fee payments
through electronic payment methods. The proposed revision to Sec.
97.177 would specify that payments could be made through the Plant
Variety Protection system or through pay.gov, although payments by
check or money order would still be allowed.
The proposed rule would replace obsolete references in the
regulations to the Official Journal of the Plant Variety Protection
Office with references to the PVPO website, which is the current
business portal used by PVPO to provide service to its customers.
Another revision would add a reference to the PVPO website to the
section. Such changes are proposed for Sec. Sec. 97.5(c), 97.7(c)(5),
97.14(d), 97.19, 97.403(d), and 97.800. Such changes would also be made
to what are currently paragraphs (b) and (d) of Sec. 97.104, but which
would be redesignated paragraphs (a) and (c) through other revisions to
the section. A further proposed revision to Sec. 97.5(c) would provide
that applicants could request forms and information at a PVPO email
address. A proposed revision for Sec. 97.12 would clarify that PVPO
could use mail or email to notify applicants of the filing number and
effective filing date of applications received by PVPO. Section
97.23(c) would be revised to specify that refiling a voluntarily
withdrawn original application must be accompanied by payment of a new
filing and examination fee, while Sec. 97.23(d) would be removed
altogether, as it contains obsolete references to applications pending
on April 4, 1995. An additional revision to Sec. 97.104 (a) would
remove reference to the return of seed samples deposited with
applications since that is no longer the practice of PVPO and would
provide that samples of seed and propagating material associated with
abandoned applications and certificates would be retained or destroyed
by the depository. Finally, the proposed rule would correct the
reference in Sec. 97.500 to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, to whom applicants may appeal if they are dissatisfied with
decisions of the Secretary related to plant variety protection issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small
business entities. The affected industry falls under the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) as code 54171--Research and
development in the physical, engineering, and life sciences. This
classification includes firms that are not plant breeders/plant
research; however no detailed industry data was available for the
analysis.
Table 1 shows the most recent descriptive data for the industry,
obtained from the County Business Pattern 2016 survey. This data set
provides information on the number of establishments, number of
employees and total annual payroll.
[[Page 33178]]
Table 1--Number of Establishments, Revenue and Payroll by Employee Count, NAICS Code 54171, 2016 County Business
Patterns \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of paid Annual payroll
establishments employees ($1,000)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All establishments.................................. 17,292 695,810 $82,865,611
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Small Business Administration (SBA) determines firm size for
this industry by number of employees, but on a per firm basis, with
small firms defined as having fewer than 1,000 employees and 1,000 or
more employees per firm classified as large. Because firms may own more
than one establishment, and the County Business Patterns data are
compiled on an establishment rather than a firm basis, we must use the
Economic Census data to determine the number of small and large firms
for the industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Geography Area Series: County Business Patterns by
Employment Size Class, 2016 Business Patterns, https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=BP_2016_00A3&prodType=table.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2 shows the most recent data available on the breakdown
between small (<1,000 employees) and large (1,000 or more employees)
firms in this industry, according to the SBA's guidance.\2\ The data
are from the 2002 Economic Census, with monetary values converted to
2016 dollars. More recent Economic Census data is not available at this
level of detail for this industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ``Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North
American Industry Classification System Codes'', Small Business
Administration, effective January 1, 2017, https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf.
\3\ Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services: Subject
Series--Establishment and Firm Size: Employment Size of Firms for
the United States: 2002 Economic Census of the United States,
https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2002_US_54SSSZ5&prodType=table.
Table 2--Number of Firms and Establishments, Revenue and Payroll by Employee Count, NAICS Code 54171, 2002
Economic Census \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size of firm by number of Number of Number of Number of paid Revenue * Annual payroll
employees firms establishments employees ($1,000) * ($1,000)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small--Firms with less than 10,200 11,753 273,601 $49,702,793 $24,780,487
1,000 employees.............
Large--Firms with 1,000 79 1,380 283,816 30,095,258 27,776,903
employees or more...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All firms.................... 10,279 13,133 557,417 79,798,051 52,557,389
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Adjusted to 2016 values.
The 2002 Economic Census reported that fewer than one percent of
firms were considered large (79 of 10,279 firms, or 0.54 percent). The
10,279 firms at that time owned a total of 13,133 establishments, with
1,380 (nearly 11 percent) of these facilities owned by the 79 large
firms.
The tables show the extent of growth in the industry over time. The
number of establishments has grown from 13,133 in 2002 to 17,292 in
2016 (32 percent, or 2.3 percent per year). Total employment increased
from 557,417 workers to 695,810 (25 percent, or 1.8 percent per year),
and total annual payroll from $52,557,389 to $82,865,611 (58 percent,
or 4 percent per year). These figures indicate that the industry has
seen small to moderate growth, with a more highly paid work force over
time. There do not appear significant changes in the structure of the
industry between 2002 and 2016.
In reviewing PVPO's list of customers, AMS found evidence that the
size distribution of the firms affected by this rule was consistent
with data reported in the 2002 Economic Census. AMS estimates that most
PVPO customers would be considered small business entities under the
criteria established by SBA (13 CFR 121.201), while fewer than 5% of
the plant breeders and plant research and development firms using PVPO
services would be considered large businesses with 1,000 or more
employees.
The PVP Office administers the PVP Act of 1970, as amended (7
U.S.C. 2321 et seq.), and issues Certificates of Protection that
provide intellectual property rights to developers of new varieties of
plants. A Certificate of Protection is awarded to an owner of a variety
after examination indicates that it is new, distinct from other
varieties, genetically uniform, and stable through successive
generations. PVP is a voluntary service.
This proposed rule would amend the regulations to add application
and certification procedures for asexually reproduced plants that
mirror procedures currently in use for sexually reproduced and tuber
propagated varieties. The proposed rule is intended to give breeders of
new plant varieties additional tools for protecting new and emerging
crops that were not previously available. This benefit would accrue to
breeders of all sizes. As well, the proposed rule would simplify the
fee schedule for services provided by the PVPO and would reduce fees
for some services from $107.00 per hour to $97.00 per hour. The new fee
schedule and rates would streamline the certification process and
reduce the cost of maintaining a PVP Certificate of Protection and
would apply to applicants of all sizes. Finally, proposed modernization
of business processes under the regulations is intended to improve
service delivery to PVPO customers of all sizes.
There are currently more than 800 users of the plant variety
protection service, of whom about 95 file applications in a given year.
Some of these users are small business entities under the criteria
established by SBA (13 CFR 121.201). With this action, the number of
users is expected to increase by roughly 40 firms. The new applicants
are expected to submit an additional 50 new applications on a yearly
basis.
PVP applicants are subject to an application fee of $5,150 per
certificate. This proposed rule would allow firms that withdraw their
applications to be reimbursed $768. Additional services are available
from the PVPO at the
[[Page 33179]]
request of the applicant. Applicants using these services are subject
to fees as listed in the rule schedule (7 CFR 97.175), with the
inclusion of the reduction in fees for specified services. It is
expected that new applicants will also participate in the Germ Plasm
Deposit, at a cost of $3,000 per applicant.
The burden on the new entrants is calculated by multiplying the
cost of application, $5,150, by the number of expected new applicants
(50), for an additional cost of $5,150 * 50 = $257,500. The cost to new
applicants for the Germ Plasm Deposit is $3,000 * 50 = $150,000. In
total this represents an additional cost to industry for this proposed
rule of $407,500. The estimate is an upper boundary made without
including the cost savings that result from the reduced hourly fee for
additional services or the reimbursement for withdrawn applications, as
these cost reductions are expected to be needed infrequently.
Due to the limited cost of the proposed rule expanding a voluntary
program, AMS has determined that this action would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of these small
business entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the information collection requirements for this program
will be submitted as a new collection to OMB for approval and will be
reported in the final rule.
This proposed rule would revise the list of plant varieties
eligible for PVPO certification and protection to include asexually
reproduced plants. This proposed rule would also simplify the fee
schedule for applicants and would lower the fees for some services.
Finally, this rule would modernize the PVPO regulations to reflect
current industry and government business operations. Reports and forms
used in PVPO operations are periodically reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
E-Gov
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies, to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771
This proposed rule does not meet the definition of a significant
regulatory action contained in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
and is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Costs'
'' (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments. Executive
Order 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult and coordinate with
tribes on a government-to-government basis on: (1) Policies that have
tribal implication, including regulation, legislative comments, or
proposed legislation; and (2) other policy statements or actions that
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
AMS has assessed the impact of this proposed rule on Indian tribes
and determined that this rule would not have tribal implications that
require consultation under Executive Order 13175. AMS hosts a quarterly
teleconference with tribal leaders where matters of mutual interest
regarding the marketing of agricultural products are discussed.
Information about the proposed changes to the regulations will be
shared during an upcoming quarterly call, and tribal leaders will be
informed about the proposed revisions to the regulation and the
opportunity to submit comments. AMS will work with the USDA Office of
Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful consultation is provided as
needed with regards to the PVPO regulations.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988--Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed action is not intended to have
retroactive effect, nor would it preempt any state or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with the proposed rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 63 of the Act,
when an application for plant variety protection has been refused by
the PVPO, the applicant may appeal to the Secretary. The Secretary must
seek the advice of the Plant Variety Protection Board on all appeals
before deciding an appeal. The Act provides that an applicant can
appeal the Secretary's decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, or institute a civil action in the U.S. District
Court, provided that such action is taken within 60 days of the
Secretary's decision, or such further time as the Secretary allows.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 97
Plants, Seeds.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, USDA proposes to amend 7
CFR part 97 as follows:
PART 97--PLANT VARIETY AND PROTECTION
0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Plant Variety Protection Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C.
2321 et seq.
0
2. Revise Sec. 97.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.1 General.
Certificates of protection are issued by the Plant Variety
Protection office for new, distinct, uniform, and stable varieties of
sexually reproduced, tuber propagated, or asexually reproduced plants.
Each certificate of plant variety protection certifies that the breeder
has the right, during the term of the protection, to prevent others
from selling the variety, offering it for sale, reproducing it,
importing or exporting it, conditioning it, stocking it, or using it in
producing a hybrid or different variety from it, as provided by the
Act.
0
3. Amend Sec. 97.2 by removing the definition for Official Journal
and revising the definition for Sale for other than seed purposes to
read as follows:
Sec. 97.2 Meaning of words.
* * * * *
Sale for other than seed or propagating purposes. The transfer of
title to and possession of the seed or propagating material by the
owner to a grower or other person, for reproduction for the owner, for
testing, or for experimental use, and not for commercial sale of the
seed, reproduced seed, propagating material, or reproduced propagating
material for planting purposes.
0
4. Amend Sec. 97.5 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.5 General requirements.
* * * * *
(c) Application and exhibit forms shall be issued by the
Commissioner.
[[Page 33180]]
(Copies of the forms may be obtained from the Plant Variety Protection
Office by sending an email request to [email protected] or
downloading forms from the PVPO website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO).
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 97.6 by revising paragraphs (c) and (d)(3) and adding
paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.6 Application for certificate.
* * * * *
(c) The fees for filing an application, examination, and
certificate issuance shall be submitted with the application in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 97.175 through 97.178.
(d) * * *
(3) With the application for a hybrid from self-incompatible
parents, a declaration that a plot of vegetative material for each
parent will be established in a public depository approved by the
Commissioner and will be maintained for the duration of the
certificate, or
(4) With the application for an asexually propagated variety, a
declaration that a deposit of propagating material in a public
depository approved by the Commissioner will be made and maintained for
the duration of the certificate.
0
6. Amend Sec. 97.7 by revising paragraphs (c)(5) and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 97.7 Deposit of Voucher Specimen.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) Once a depository is recognized to be suitable by the
Commissioner or has defaulted or discontinued its performance under
this section, notice thereof will be published on the Plant Variety
Protection Office website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO).
(d) Time of making an original deposit. An original deposit of
materials for seed-reproduced plants shall be made within three months
of the filing date of the application or prior to issuance of the
certificate, whichever occurs first. An original deposit of materials
for tuber-propagated plants or asexually reproduced plants shall be
made within three months from the notice of certificate issuance date.
A waiver from these time requirements may be granted for good cause,
such as delays in obtaining a phytosanitary certificate for the
importation of voucher sample materials. A delay waiver may also be
granted to address the technical infeasibility of depositing
propagating materials for certain asexually reproduced plants.
(1) When the original deposit is made, the applicant must promptly
submit a statement from a person in a position to corroborate the fact,
stating that the voucher specimen material which is deposited is the
variety specifically identified in the application as filed. Such
statement must be filed in the application and must contain the
identifying information listed in paragraph (b) of this section and:
(i) The name and address of the depository;
(ii) The date of deposit;
(iii) The accession number given by the depository; and
(iv) A statement that the deposit is capable of reproduction.
(2) When a delay waiver is granted due to technical difficulties
with depositing propagating materials for asexually reproduced plants,
the applicant is required to make a declaration that a voucher specimen
will be provided within three months of a request by the Plant Variety
Protection Office. Failure to provide a specimen as requested shall
result in the certificate being regarded as abandoned.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 97.9 by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 97.9 Drawings and photographs.
* * * * *
(b) Drawings or photographs shall be in color when color is a
distinguishing characteristic of the variety, and the color shall be
described by use of Nickerson's color fan, the Munsell Book of Color,
the Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, or other recognized color
chart.
(c) Drawings shall be sent flat, or may be sent in a suitable
mailing tube, in accordance with instructions furnished by the
Commissioner.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 97.12 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.12 Number and filing date of an application.
(a) Applications shall be numbered and dated in sequence in the
order received by the Office. Applicants will be informed in writing,
by mail or email, as soon as practicable of the number and effective
filing date of the application.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 97.14 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.14 Joint applicants.
* * * * *
(d) If a joint owner refuses to join in an application or cannot be
found after diligent effort, the remaining owner may file an
application on behalf of him or herself and the missing owner. Such
application shall be accompanied by a written explanation and shall
state the last known address of the missing owner. Notice of the filing
of the application shall be forwarded by the Office to the missing
owner at the last known address. If such notice is returned to the
Office undelivered, or if the address of the missing owner is unknown,
notice of the filing of the application shall be published once on the
Plant Variety Protection Office website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO). Prior to the issuance of the certificate, a missing owner may
join in an application by filing a written explanation. A certificate
obtained by fewer than all of the joint owners under this paragraph
conveys the same rights and privileges to said owners as though all of
the original owners had joined in an application.
0
10. Amend Sec. 97.19 by revising the introductory text and paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.19 Publication of pending applications.
Information relating to pending applications shall be published
periodically as determined by the Commissioner to be necessary in the
public interest. With respect to each application, the Plant Variety
Protection Office website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO) shall show:
* * * * *
(c) The name of the crop; and
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec. 97. 20 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.20 Abandonment for failure to respond within the time limit.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in Sec. 97.104, if an applicant
fails to advance actively his or her application within 30 days after
the date when the last request for action was mailed to the applicant
by the Office, or within such longer time as may be fixed by the
Commissioner, the application shall be deemed abandoned. The filing and
examination fees in such cases will not be refunded.
* * * * *
0
12. Amend Sec. 97.23 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows, and
by removing paragraph (d).
Sec. 97.23 Voluntary withdrawal and abandonment of an application.
* * * * *
(c) An original application which has been voluntarily withdrawn
shall be returned to the applicant and may be reconsidered only by
refiling and
[[Page 33181]]
payment of new filing and examination fees.
0
13. Revise Sec. 97. 101 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.101 Notice of allowance.
If, on examination, PVPO determines that the applicant is entitled
to a certificate, a notice of allowance shall be sent to the applicant
or his or her attorney or agent of record, if any, requesting
verification of the variety name and of the name of the owner. The
notice will also provide an opportunity for withdrawal of the
application before certificate issuance. The applicant must respond
within 30 days from the date of the notice of allowance. Thereafter, a
fee for delayed response shall be charged as specified in Sec.
97.175(f).
0
14. Amend Sec. 97.103 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.103 Issuance of a certificate.
(a) After the notice of allowance has been issued and the applicant
has clearly specified whether or not the variety shall be sold by
variety name only as a class of certified seed, the certificate shall
be promptly issued. Once an election is made and a certificate issued
specifying that seed of the variety shall be sold by variety name only
as a class of certified seed, no waiver of such rights shall be
permitted by amendment of the certificate.
* * * * *
0
15. Amend Sec. 97.104 by removing paragraph (a), redesignating
paragraphs (b) through (d) as paragraphs (a) through (c), and revising
redesignated paragraphs (a) through (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.104 Application or certificate abandoned.
(a) Upon request by the Office, the owner shall replenish the seed
or propagating material of the variety and shall pay the handling fee
for replenishment. Samples of seed or propagating material related to
abandoned applications or certificates will be retained or destroyed by
the depository. Failure to replenish seed or propagating material
within 3 months from the date of request shall result in the
certificate being regarded as abandoned. No sooner than 1 year after
the date of such request, notices of abandoned certificates shall be
published on the Plant Variety Protection Office website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO), indicating that the variety has become open for
use by the public and, if previously specified to be sold by variety
name as ``certified seed only,'' that such restriction no longer
applies.
(b) If the seed or propagating material is submitted within 9
months of the final due date, it may be accepted by the Commissioner as
though no abandonment had occurred. For good cause, the Commissioner
may extend for a reasonable time the period for submitting seed or
propagating material before declaring the certificate abandoned.
(c) A certificate may be voluntarily abandoned by the applicant or
his or her attorney or agent of record or the assignee of record by
notifying the Commissioner in writing. Upon receipt of such notice, the
Commissioner shall publish a notice on the Plant Variety Protection
Office website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO) that the variety has
become open for use by the public, and if previously specified to be
sold by variety name as ``certified seed only,'' that such restriction
no longer applies.
0
16. Revise Sec. 97.141 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.141 After issuance.
Upon issuance of a certificate, the owner of the variety, or his or
her designee, may label the variety, propagating material of the
variety, or containers of the seed of the variety or plants produced
from such seed or propagating material substantially as follows:
``Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited--(Unauthorized Seed or
Propagating Material Multiplication Prohibited)--U.S. Protected
Variety.'' Where applicable, ``PVPA 1994'' or ``PVPA 1994--Unauthorized
Sales for Reproductive Purposes Prohibited'' may be added to the
notice.
0
17. Revise Sec. 97.142 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.142 For testing or increase.
An owner who contemplates filing an application and releases for
testing or increase seed of the variety or propagating material or
reproducible plant material of the variety may label such plant
material or containers of the seed or plant material substantially as
follows: ``Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited--For Testing (or
Increase) Only.''
0
18. Revise Sec. 97.175 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.175 Fees and charges.
The following fees and charges apply to the services and actions
specified below:
(a) Application
(1) Initial fee for filing, examination, and certificate issuance--
$5,150
(2) Submission of new application data prior to issuance of
certificate--$432
(3) Granting extensions for responding to data requests--$89
(4) Refunds pursuant to Sec. 97.178 may be issued for portions of
the initial application fee as follows: Examination--$3,864, and
certificate issuance--$768.
(b) Reconsideration of application--$589
(c) Revival of an abandoned application--$518
(d) Appeals
(1) Filing a petition for protest to Commissioner--$4,118
(2) Appeal to Secretary (refundable if appeal overturns protest to
Commissioner)--$4,942
(e) Field inspections or other services requiring travel by a
representative of the Plant Variety Protection Office, made at the
request of the applicant, shall be reimbursable in full (including
travel, per diem or subsistence, salary, and administrative costs), in
accordance with standardized government travel regulations.
(f) Any other service not covered in this section, including, but
not limited to, reproduction of records, authentication, correction, or
reissuance of a certificate, recordation or revision of assignment, and
late fees will be charged for at rates prescribed by the Commissioner,
but in no event shall they exceed $97 per employee hour. Charges will
also be made for materials, space, and administrative costs.
0
19. Revise Sec. 97. 177 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.177 Method of payment.
Payments can be submitted through the electronic Plant Variety
Protection system or pay.gov. Checks or money orders shall be made
payable to the Treasurer of the United States. Remittances from foreign
countries must be payable and immediately negotiable in the United
States for the full amount of the prescribed fee. Money sent by mail to
the Office shall be sent at the sender's risk.
0
20. Revise Sec. 97.178 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.178 Refunds.
Money paid by mistake or excess payments shall be refunded, but a
mere change of plans after the payment of money, as when a party
decides to withdraw an application or to withdraw an appeal, shall not
entitle a party to a refund. However, the examination fee shall be
refunded if an application is voluntarily withdrawn or abandoned
pursuant to Sec. 97.23(a) before the examination has begun. The
certificate issuance fee shall be refunded if an application is
voluntarily withdrawn or abandoned after an examination has been
completed and before a certificate has been issued. Amounts of $1 or
less shall not be refunded unless specifically demanded.
[[Page 33182]]
0
21. Amend Sec. 97.403 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 97.403 Manner of service.
* * * * *
(d) Whenever it shall be found by the Commissioner or Secretary
that none of the above modes of serving the paper is practicable,
service may be by notice, published once on the Plant Variety
Protection Office website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO).
0
22. Revise Sec. 97.500 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.500 Appeal to U.S. Courts.
Any applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Secretary on
appeal may appeal to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, or institute a civil action in the U.S. District Court as set
forth in the Act. In such cases, the appellant or plaintiff shall give
notice to the Secretary, state the reasons for appeal or civil action,
and obtain a certified copy of the record. The certified copy of the
record shall be forwarded to the Court by the Plant Variety Protection
Office on order of, and at the expense of the appellant or plaintiff.
0
23. Revise Sec. 97.800 to read as follows:
Sec. 97.800 Publication of public variety descriptions.
Voluntary submissions of varietal descriptions of ``public
varieties'' on forms obtainable from the Office will be accepted for
publication on the Plant Variety Protection Office website (https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO). Such publication shall not constitute
recognition that the variety is, in fact, distinct, uniform, and
stable.
Dated: July 8, 2019.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-14799 Filed 7-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P