Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Basic Inspection and Maintenance Program Certification State Implementation Plan for the Baltimore Nonattainment Area Under the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 33006-33008 [2019-14691]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
33006
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
b. Under ‘‘Reg 7—Standards of
Performance for New Affected
Facilities’’ by revising the entry for
‘‘7.36’’ to read as follows:
Subpart (S)—Kentucky
■
2. Section 52.920(c), Table 2, is
amended:
■ a. Under ‘‘Reg 6—Standards of
Performance for Existing Affected
Facilities’’ by revising the entry for
‘‘6.26’’; and
§ 52.920
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 2—EPA-APPROVED JEFFERSON COUNTY REGULATIONS FOR KENTUCKY
Reg
EPA approval
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
District
effective
date
Federal Register notice
*
*
Explanation
*
Reg 6—Standards of Performance for Existing Affected Facilities
*
*
*
6.26 ........ Standards of Performance for Existing Volatile Organic Compound Water Separators.
*
*
*
*
7/11/2019
*
*
[Insert citation of publication].
*
*
*
1/17/18
*
*
Reg 7—Standards of Performance for New Affected Facilities
*
*
*
7.36 ........ Standards of Performance for New Volatile Organic
Compound Water Separators.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–14631 Filed 7–10–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2018–0397; FRL–9996–28–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Basic Inspection and
Maintenance Program Certification
State Implementation Plan for the
Baltimore Nonattainment Area Under
the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland.
This SIP revision satisfies a Clean Air
Act (CAA) requirement for enactment of
a vehicle emissions inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program in the
Baltimore area—where ambient air
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Jul 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
*
7/11/2019
*
*
[Insert citation of publication].
*
quality has been classified by EPA as
‘‘Moderate’’ or higher nonattainment of
federal ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) established
in 2008 (hereafter referred to as the 2008
ozone NAAQS). The CAA requires
states to demonstrate that any moderate
ozone nonattainment area has adopted a
basic I/M program (as defined by the
CAA). In the event an I/M program was
previously enacted to meet a prior
NAAQS or other CAA requirement, the
state must show that the enacted I/M
program continues to meet applicable
federal requirements for a basic I/M
program. Maryland’s SIP revision that is
the subject of this action pertains to
CAA requirements for a basic I/M
program in the Baltimore area for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA is approving
Maryland’s I/M program certification, in
accordance with the requirements of the
CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 12, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2018–0397. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
1/17/18
*
*
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Rehn, Planning & Implementation
Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The
telephone number is (215) 814–2176.
Mr. Rehn can also be reached via
electronic mail at rehn.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Purpose
On March 19, 2019 (84 FR 9993), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of
Maryland. In the NPRM, EPA proposed
approval of Maryland’s SIP revision
certifying that the existing vehicle
emission inspection program
implemented in the Baltimore ozone
nonattainment area satisfies the CAA
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
requirement under section 182(b)(4) to
adopt a vehicle inspection program in
areas newly classified as moderate
nonattainment under the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. The rationale for EPA’s
proposed action on the State’s I/M
certification SIP was explained in the
NPRM and will not be restated here. No
adverse public comments were received
on the NPRM; three supportive
comments were received on the NPRM.
The formal SIP revision [SIP #18–01]
was submitted by Maryland on March
15, 2018.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the submitted motor
vehicle I/M certification as a revision to
the Maryland SIP for the Baltimore
ozone nonattainment area.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Jul 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33007
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 9, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action to
approve Maryland’s certification that
the existing Baltimore vehicle emissions
inspection program meets CAA
requirements for a basic I/M program for
the Baltimore ozone nonattainment area
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 25, 2019.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry
‘‘Basic vehicle emission inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program requirement
certification for the 2008 ozone national
ambient air quality standard’’ at the end
of the table to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1070
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
*
*
33008
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
Applicable
geographic area
*
*
Basic vehicle emission inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program requirement certification for the 2008 ozone
national ambient air quality standard.
*
Baltimore ................
[FR Doc. 2019–14691 Filed 7–10–19; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0368; EPA–R05–
OAR–2018–0556; FRL–9988–38–Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Indiana;
Revised Designation of Illinois and
Indiana 2012 PM2.5 Unclassifiable
Areas
Correction
In rule document 2018–27903,
appearing on pages 66631–66635, in the
issue of Thursday, December 27, 2018,
make the following correction:
§ 81.315
Indiana. [Corrected]
On page 66634, in the table titled
‘‘Indiana—2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
[Primary]’’, in the second column titled
‘‘Date 2’’, the dates that read ‘‘1/28/
2018’’, should read 01/28/2019’’.
■
[FR Doc. C1–2018–27903 Filed 7–10–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 180117042–8884–02]
RIN 0648–XT007
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason
General category retention limit
adjustment.
jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
NMFS is adjusting the
Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) General
category daily retention limit from three
large medium or giant BFT per vessel
per day/trip to one large medium or
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Jul 10, 2019
Jkt 247001
State
submittal
date
*
3/15/2018
EPA approval date
Additional explanation
*
7/11/2019, [Insert
Federal Register
citation].
*
*
Certification that Maryland’s previously
approved regulation at COMAR
11.14.08 meets the requirement for a
basic I/M program in the Baltimore
Area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
giant BFT per vessel per day/trip for the
remainder of the June through August
2019 subquota period. This action is
based on consideration of the regulatory
determination criteria regarding
inseason adjustments and applies to
Atlantic Tunas General category
(commercial) permitted vessels and
Highly Migratory Species (HMS)
Charter/Headboat category permitted
vessels with a commercial sale
endorsement when fishing
commercially for BFT.
DATES: Effective July 11, 2019, through
August 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah McLaughlin, 978–281–9260 or
Larry Redd, 301–427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations implemented under the
authority of the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA; 16 U.S.C. 971 et
seq.) and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.) governing the harvest of BFT by
persons and vessels subject to U.S.
jurisdiction are found at 50 CFR part
635. Section 635.27 subdivides the U.S.
BFT quota recommended by the
International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
among the various domestic fishing
categories, per the allocations
established in Amendment 7 to the 2006
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Fishery Management Plan (2006
Consolidated HMS FMP) (Amendment
7) (79 FR 71510, December 2, 2014), and
in accordance with implementing
regulations. NMFS is required under
ATCA and the Magnuson-Stevens Act to
provide U.S. fishing vessels with a
reasonable opportunity to harvest the
ICCAT-recommended quota.
The baseline quota for the General
category is 555.7 mt. See § 635.27(a).
Each of the General category time
periods (January, June through August,
September, October through November,
and December) is allocated a portion of
the annual General category quota.
Although it is called the ‘‘January’’
subquota, the regulations allow the
General category fishery under this
quota to continue until the subquota is
reached or March 31, whichever comes
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
first. The baseline subquotas for each
time period are as follows: 24.7 mt for
January; 233.3 mt for June through
August; 123.7 mt for September; 60.7 mt
for October through November; and 24.3
mt for December. Any unused General
category quota rolls forward within the
fishing year, which coincides with the
calendar year, from one time period to
the next, and is available for use in
subsequent time periods. This action
would adjust the daily retention limit
for the remainder of the second time
period in 2019, June through August.
Adjustment of General Category Daily
Retention Limit
The default General category retention
limit is one large medium or giant BFT
(measuring 73 inches (185 cm) curved
fork length (CFL) or greater) per vessel
per day/trip (§ 635.23(a)(2)).
Under § 635.23(a)(4), NMFS may
increase or decrease the daily retention
limit of large medium and giant BFT
over a range of zero to a maximum of
five per vessel based on consideration of
the relevant criteria provided under
§ 635.27(a)(8). NMFS adjusted the daily
retention limit for the beginning of the
June through August 2019 subquota
period from the default level of one
large medium or giant BFT to three large
medium or giant BFT (84 FR 22734,
May 20, 2019). NMFS has considered
the relevant regulatory determination
criteria and their applicability to the
General category BFT retention limit for
the remainder of the June through
August 2019 subquota time period.
These considerations include, but are
not limited to, the following:
Regarding the usefulness of
information obtained from catches in
the particular category for biological
sampling and monitoring of the status of
the stock (§ 635.27(a)(8)(i)), biological
samples collected from BFT landed by
General category fishermen and
provided by BFT dealers continue to
provide NMFS with valuable data for
ongoing scientific studies of BFT age
and growth, migration, and reproductive
status. Prolonged opportunities to land
BFT over the longest time-period
allowable would support the collection
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 133 (Thursday, July 11, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33006-33008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14691]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0397; FRL-9996-28-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Basic Inspection and Maintenance Program Certification State
Implementation Plan for the Baltimore Nonattainment Area Under the 2008
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland.
This SIP revision satisfies a Clean Air Act (CAA) requirement for
enactment of a vehicle emissions inspection and maintenance (I/M)
program in the Baltimore area--where ambient air quality has been
classified by EPA as ``Moderate'' or higher nonattainment of federal
ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) established in
2008 (hereafter referred to as the 2008 ozone NAAQS). The CAA requires
states to demonstrate that any moderate ozone nonattainment area has
adopted a basic I/M program (as defined by the CAA). In the event an I/
M program was previously enacted to meet a prior NAAQS or other CAA
requirement, the state must show that the enacted I/M program continues
to meet applicable federal requirements for a basic I/M program.
Maryland's SIP revision that is the subject of this action pertains to
CAA requirements for a basic I/M program in the Baltimore area for the
2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA is approving Maryland's I/M program
certification, in accordance with the requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 12, 2019.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0397. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Rehn, Planning & Implementation
Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
The telephone number is (215) 814-2176. Mr. Rehn can also be reached
via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Purpose
On March 19, 2019 (84 FR 9993), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of Maryland. In the NPRM, EPA proposed
approval of Maryland's SIP revision certifying that the existing
vehicle emission inspection program implemented in the Baltimore ozone
nonattainment area satisfies the CAA
[[Page 33007]]
requirement under section 182(b)(4) to adopt a vehicle inspection
program in areas newly classified as moderate nonattainment under the
2008 ozone NAAQS. The rationale for EPA's proposed action on the
State's I/M certification SIP was explained in the NPRM and will not be
restated here. No adverse public comments were received on the NPRM;
three supportive comments were received on the NPRM. The formal SIP
revision [SIP #18-01] was submitted by Maryland on March 15, 2018.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the submitted motor vehicle I/M certification as a
revision to the Maryland SIP for the Baltimore ozone nonattainment
area.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 9, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action to approve Maryland's certification that the
existing Baltimore vehicle emissions inspection program meets CAA
requirements for a basic I/M program for the Baltimore ozone
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 25, 2019.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry ``Basic vehicle emission inspection and maintenance (I/M) program
requirement certification for the 2008 ozone national ambient air
quality standard'' at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 33008]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable submittal EPA approval date Additional explanation
revision geographic area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Basic vehicle emission Baltimore......... 3/15/2018 7/11/2019, [Insert Certification that
inspection and maintenance (I/ Federal Register Maryland's previously
M) program requirement citation]. approved regulation at
certification for the 2008 COMAR 11.14.08 meets
ozone national ambient air the requirement for a
quality standard. basic I/M program in
the Baltimore Area for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-14691 Filed 7-10-19; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
